DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Trump Fires Kristi Noem

TRUMP REPLACES NOEM: President Donald Trump announced in a post on Truth Social that he is replacing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem with Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla. Trump's frustrations with Noem mounted following her testimony to Senate and House members this week, lawmakers and people familiar with the discussions told NBC News.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tr...llroom-elections-live-updates-rcna261251

I hope she now sees what it looks like when you pledge your loyalty to man who has no concept of what it means to give loyalty in return.

There is no such thing as loyalty in the real world if you want to be successful. Results are all that matter. You can like someone personally but if that person is not getting the results, you expect then they get replaced with someone who hopefully does.

Then why was she suddenly fired?

As if Spending hundreds of Millions of dollars on an Ad Campaign extolling the virtues of ICE raids wasn't enough of a mistake, she goes on to say Trump himself approved the ad campaign. What is it she was thinking.

With Trump, Loyalty is a one way street. Always has been, always will be.

She gave herself a movie to star in. And gave huge contracts to her friends. She said She didnt know the specifics of the contracts. She lied to congress.

That question makes no sense. She was fired. So, Trump proved in his world results Trump loyalty. Which in business should be the case. The bottom line is results. That is not personal it is just reality. If you don't produce the expected results, then next man up.

What didn't she produce? People get fired for cause. What was the cause? What results didn't she produce? Yes, the question makes sense. Just because you refuse to address it doesn't make it a bad question.

Was it the 220-250 million dollar ad campaign which she made herself the star of? Was it telling her telling the House Judiciary Committee that trump approved of the money she spent on those ads? Was it her purchase of a 70 million dollar luxury jet for her travels with the DHS?

Which brings up some interesting questions.........

Does that jet stay with the DHS or will it now go with Noem to the "The Shield of the Americas – Western Hemisphere"? The new "special envoy" job created just for her?

And if it stays with the DHS, did her and Corey Lewandowski stain up the furniture and bedding in the new luxury jet? And if they did will trump decide to appoint a "special envoy of sanitation" to remove the stains from the new luxury jet?

Inquiring minds need to know.

He knows his first response made no sense either, that's why he wants to argue about different things now. ^Look^, now you have eighteen other questions to answer; if you don't, he figures he won the argument.

He's like the one kid in the sandbox that constantly cries and throws sand. Unfortunately, this one never packs up his toys and goes home.

As per usual you have nothing to add to the topic and only attack the messenger. Has arch been giving you lessons? Try to focus on the issue at hand for a change instead of me. I know how difficult that will be for you.

What's to add? He fired her because she sucks at her job. This topic didn't need its own thread, you created it. Then you and your sidekick wanted to make it about Trump and how he spits on "loyalty". I must say, taking her side is a bold strategy, especially when you've had her on blast since she was hired; but here we are.

You're a walking dichotomy when your TDS kicks in, you literally listed all the things she did wrong but still said: "I hope she now sees what it looks like when you pledge your loyalty to man who has no concept of what it means to give loyalty in return."

So tell me honestly, how many people have you witnessed trump kick to the curb who had shown him nothing but total loyalty? Nobody "made that up".

Your reply is rather odd. She did that ad campaign quite some time ago. She bought not only that luxury jet but also jest to deport immigrants some time ago. The only thing she did over the past week was telling the House Judiciary Committee that trump approved of the money she spent on those ads. Hmmmmm......

You children and your TDS. You all sound like you're 12. On the playground your kind used to say "You have cooties!". You just changed the word cooties for TDS. No wonder trump loves the uneducated.

You just hate it when people post about the stupidity and blunders going on in this administration. And instead of addressing them you attack the messenger with some childish retort.

From staring wars to the dysfunction going on, if we waited on your kind to post about it it would never be posted on the board. You are the "hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil" crowd when it come to trump. But that's okay, I'll pick up your slack.

And now for the new DHS Secretary U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin.

U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma graduated from Stilwell High School and later earned an Associate of Applied Science (A.A.S.) in Construction Technology from the Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology in 2010. He also attended Missouri Valley College on a wrestling scholarship in 1996 and received an honorary doctorate from Bacone College in 2018.

U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) previously owned and operated his family’s plumbing business, Mullin Plumbing, before entering Congress. To comply with House ethics rules regarding outside employment and potential conflicts of interest, he moved the companies into a trust, sold, or transferred ownership, though he faced scrutiny and a lengthy investigation into continued payments.

Based on analyses of the 118th Congress, Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma is recognized as the only sitting U.S. senator without at least a bachelor's degree. He holds an associate degree in construction technology from Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology rather than a four-year degree.

The least educated member of the Senate. He should fit in well. The only credentials he lacks to be the perfect candidate is that he isn't a former FOX News employee.

Without getting into the whole "college = intelligence" argument, I see no problem deviating from the criteria that got us to our current congressional roster.

So you are suggesting that four year college degrees is the cause of the mess we're in? Or maybe the fact that it's unusual that former plumbers aren't members of the senate then elevated to a cabinet position? Or maybe that former media talking heads aren't appointed to high government positions?

For his second term, President Donald Trump selected at least 19 former Fox News hosts, journalists, and contributors for senior administration positions, including several cabinet-level or top-tier roles.

Surely that's not what you're suggesting is it?