DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns GM Andrew Berry: ‘No rule against extending’ Deshaun Watson’s contract; QB battle is performance-based

Green offers too much potential to add to the explosiveness to the O to sit the bench for long stretches. The problem with bringing him in for a package of plays here and there is you are telling the D what you are hoping to do. At least do it from a WR slot where the intent isn't as obvious...at least as long as it isn't as obvious as it was under Stefanski where you knew it was some sort of jet sweep or reverse 95% of the time.

Yeah, it was pretty predictable when Elijah Moore showed up it was going to be a jet sweep. A player has to have more than one calling card to be effective. That is on the coaches as well.

Yeah, it was pretty predictable when Elijah Moore showed up it was going to be a jet sweep. A player has to have more than one calling card to be effective. That is on the coaches as well.

Moore was a WR. Green is a QB who is a threat to pass or run the ball. These two situations are not similar.

Except when they are running onto the field, the other team is screaming their name and the probable play.

Once again Moore a WR. Green is an actual QB. Green opens up the option to pass or run from the pocket which does not give the play away when he comes on the field. You do understand the difference there don't you?

Exactly Pit..

You can build a short yardage/red zone scheme based on what Green can do. It won't be 1 or 2 plays, it will be a scheme with 10-15 plays built around the look the defense gives you. Now, given a defense each week, there might only be 4-5 of those plays that will be practiced against their particular defense set. THEN, you take those 5 plays inserted for that weekly game plan and it automatically turns into 10 plays by inverting the alignment.

Nothing is TOO vanilla in the NFL. Monken will be able to hide what he is doing with the limited number of plays schemed to Green.

It's why this type of scheming can work a lot better than the wildcat.

The difference to me is more the coach.

If you run the same play everytime one player is on the filed it's predictable
If you run multiple plays then it is no different than using any other substitution

The difference to me is more the coach.

If you run the same play everytime one player is on the filed it's predictable
If you run multiple plays then it is no different than using any other substitution

WR's aren't a legitimate threat to run or pass equally from the pocket. Your options are far more limited than having a QB in there who can be a legitimate threat to do both. In Monken's first year here they drafted him and gave him an option we didn't see them give Stefanski. I won't try predict or try to guess what Stefanski would have done with such a tool at his disposal but at the same time I'm not going to point the finger at him because he never had such an option. But I am quite convinced that won't prevent others from doing so.

I think in order to make something like this work, the offense first has to establish an identity, and then you can start adding chunks of plays off of a subset of looks.

Ex. Jacoby Brissett and the QB sneaks. We still had a strong Oline and he was really good at executing that play. Then KS added wrinkles to it. I think this is how we build a subset of plays for Green (slowly).

I think him having already been a starting QB that worked in an O where he has already worked well in the run/pass option would make this an easy transition for him. As a senior he rushed for 777 yards and eight touchdowns on 139 carries.

Based on his 2025 season at Arkansas and his performance at the 2026 Senior Bowl, Taylen Green is a dual-threat quarterback who frequently operates out of RPO (Run-Pass Option) and read-option sets, utilizing his 6'6" frame and elite speed.

I don't think there needs to be a big cause for alarm in thinking Monken needs to slow walk this.

I would slow walk him out to the WR position. Assuming he can catch. I don't see why he can't. He aces every other physical attribute. Find out with a machine whizzing balls at him. Find out if he can catch while running. Find out if he can track deep balls. If so, you have an all-pro receiver in a year. I seriously doubt he will ever be an all-pro QB.

There are guys that have been working at the WR position for years, that come in with the "raw" label, that never even come close to a second contract.

This guy would be starting from zero... you're talking about route-running, catching, route trees... the whole thing... starting from zero. Getting to 'almost-nfl-caliber' is probably not going to happen.

J/C
I think Taylen Green is further along at QB than Josh Allen was. His defense (and teammates propensity for fumbling) just had him playing from behind against better defenses. That's not a great recipe. He's not necessarily as (arm) talented as Josh, but was asked to do a lot more. Taylen needs to get quicker in his release and footwork. He's not the tank/magician that Allen is, but I think he's further along on the mental side than Josh was when he came out (that's not saying a ton.) Green has tools worth seeing if they can work at QB before considering a change that rarely ever works out.

That's not to say he'll definitely be a great QB, but he's much more QB than WR, and we've many more questions marks there.

That nay be true, but I remember when Stefanski ran 3rd or 4th and short using Harrison Bryant. I remember that 3 straight times when he was used. All 3 were distinctively different plays, and they were successful. It was a very creative use of one player to offer multiple play options.

Yeah as a player needs to be clutch along the way. Need to move on from Watson but cutting him seems to be easier said than done!

As a QB I would think he has some understanding of route trees. Catching, either he can or can't, and route running can be taught.