DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Quarterback defined Part 2

Posted by Bull;

"Or you admit you don't know, while finding a client sending "💜😏🌹" to an allegedly "professional" massage therapist suspicious."

That's one out of 26 accusers. 26 women is a copious amount of evidence to try and dispute for anyone other than those who try to blow this off as all of these women being some form of prostitutes. Which is ridiculous and demeaning to women in general.

It's as if we're back in the 1960's when if when a woman was raped some men would blame it on the victim for they way they were dressed claiming she was asking for it because she was wearing a mini skirt. There's nothing new about your kind.

Is this a sexual sins blog or a football blog. Cast the first stone if you are without sin.

Your personal refrain at the end is OLD.....did Watson pick Monken.....I've never read a thing about that, please inform us.

When it comes to Watson, it's all relative.

The law did not find enough evidence to even take it to trial. It was brought in front of 2 grand juries and neither found enough evidence to take it to trial. The man got creepy happy ending massages from shady unlicensed massage therapists who then found a way to get paid.

26 women is evidence of something. Evidence of what is the question. Sadly, Prostitution is an all too common occurrence, which can't be summarily discounted as impossible despite your finding it demeaning on behalf of all women.

It's more like we're back further than the '60s and some want to lynch the black man without a trial.

Yes, skeptics like me are nothing new. Liars, as some must be with conflicting testimony, aren't some unknown kind, either. Those that jump to conclusions and insist they know what must have happened without actually seeing all the evidence have been around, too.

Keep telling yourself that and sleep well my friend. I understand there wasn't enough evidence to take it to criminal court. The criminal system has enough to do without utilizing the system for some crimes that will be difficult to try.

However, the details of the cases that did come out are bad enough that anyone with any morals would shun his actions, not defend them. ONE of those where he purposely readjusted him self so that his penis rubbed the young woman's arm.. disgusting! It gets more disgusting when you have (3) daughters around those same ages and think about them being in the workplace.

AGAIN, you are victim blaming/shaming, calling them "shady". Isn't it enough for your argument that they should "expect" this behavior because they are unlicensed? In order to get a job at a state licensed facility or own any place that offers or advertises massage, you in turn need a license. There are no laws against having a private practice to be a traveling practitioner of therapy without a license. It doesn't make them shady, just entrepreneurs. Does this preclude them from being scrutinized by the state, thus having the ability to do shady things behind closed doors for more money? That's pretty obvious and also why Watson chose them. But, to destroy their private lives for the sake of hopefully getting a pay day is not my idea of someone that is normally "practicing shady moral acts". As soon as their names come out, it also opens the door for any man or woman that doesn't have a family and also wants to get paid by someone like TMZ to tear down that person. Believe me, if YOU think it is easy for someone to come out publicly and admit something like this happened to them, there are just as many out there willing to sell information for personal gain.

Now, that takes care of the unlicensed victims... what is your argument for the 9 LICENSED practitioners that filed against him?

Now taking all of this information into account... It is documented that he had 66 different therapists over this time period. Only 27 came forward with complaints. So, your argument holds water for SOME of the other 39 women who did not come forward. Some of which the defense attorney refused to represent because of known "shady" practices. But it still doesn't mean that the other women just didn't want to deal with the public scrutiny from people just like you, for just doing their job.

They wanted $$$ and got paid. Move on!!!

Just because criminal courts aren't allowed to just use common sense, doesn't mean you can't.

9 of those women were licensed therapists. Both grand juries only heard from one victim. That makes it a circumstantial case based on a single witness. They had no idea of the total amount of victims involved. Stop making excuses for sexual assault by blaming the victim.

You dismiss the word of 26 women to excuse watson of committing sexual assault. According to you 26 women lied and only watson is the beacon of truth. I hate to even think how naive one would have to be in order to buy into this and what someone actually thinks of women to claim this.

It's 26 to 1. To claim 26 are lying and the only one telling the truth is watson goes beyond being a skeptic. It's calling 26 women liars. Only a total lack of common sense could lead anyone to that conclusion.

This is a topic that is a continuation from a topic of the same name that was locked due to length. Nobody is forcing you to read it. That's your choice. And nobody is forcing you to whine about it either.

Monkin works for the Browns. If Monkin doesn't know the history here he hasn't done his homework. And pray tell where did I mention Monkin? Here's a clue. I didn't.

I've never sexually assaulted a woman. Consider the first stone cast.

But you are living in the past with a holier than though attitude!!!

Heaven forbid we call out a sexual predator! I mean when someone defends victims of sexual assault it must mean they're being holier than thou.

Do you even read your own posts most of the time? You have judged everyone who doesn't think exactly like you do. But remember that you accused someone else of being "holier than thou" moving forward. That one is going to bite you in the azz.

You are judging a man by hear say from 5 years ago that did not result in a crime. You are trying a man in the court of public opinion. No facts just what someone says happened in their attempt to get $$$ out of the man.