DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus DOJ launches criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll: Sources

Bill Clinton and many powerful elites.

So all those chummy pictures of donny and Epstein were fake right?

You know weddings etc. So, with his history on tape at beauty pageants grabs. Stormy Daniels.

His conviction of assault. His convictions of fraud and falsification of records on real estate records.

You know continue your worship of scum

And you continue to worship the party of human trafficking, drug trafficking, illegal aliens, crime, baby murder, trannies, etc...

The Clintons (and Democrats in general) don't seem to be the ones suppressing the release of the investigation, though.

They ahd the documents the entire Biden Administration and released 0 pages. Why is that?

Sorry but we don't have Biden Bibles, wear Biden shirts, Biden hats, and have Biden flags. That's what worshiping someone looks like. We also didn't elect a man convicted on 34 felony counts and who a jury found committed sexual assault. Or a man who had to pay off a porn star. A man who is trying to get a slush fund to pay off his thugs who assaulted police officers. And then in turn blame everyone else for his actions.

Nobody supports human trafficking, drug tafficking or crime. If you wish to claim someone supports drug trafficking try addressing how trump pardoned former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández on December 1, 2025. Hernández had been serving a 45-year prison sentence in the U.S. after being convicted of conspiring to import roughly 400 tons of cocaine into the United States.

You have officially boarded the crazy train.

Open borders sir!!! Brings all of that in our Country! So, you are welcoming me! To be a socialist you are already on the crazy train.

So you got nothing then. You can't address anything I posted. You must think FDR was Satan returned to earth.

All of you judgemental, hateful "Christians". You are the type of people that are killing religion. Jesus was our savior who taught kindness and love. Only for people like you to bastardize his message.

"I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me."

If I remember correctly, the investigation was formally closed in 2025 after appeals and other stuff was finally closed out.

You have such a warped point of view it is not worth my time.

Your generalizations and comments clearly point to someone who is fed misinformation and only seeks reinforcement of that agenda.

Continue your path of blindly being led.

don't want no short people round here they got no reason

Keep taking that quote out of context. That refers to the individual and not a country. Countries are sovereign. Christianity is not taken from some and give to others. It is for a person to graciously give from their increase to take care of someone of need. Not for a Government to take from who they feel does not deserve it and give it to someone they feel deserves it. That is wrong entirely. Yes, FDR was a horrible person.

That's not what Jesus said. That's what you "feel and believe Jesus meant". What he meant was clear. Those with less should be taken care of. He never said anything about anyone "deciding or judging who deserves it". The stranger should be welcomed. The only one adding context here is you.

Yes FDR wanted working people to make a living wage. He wanted the south and the west to have an electric grid. He no longer wanted the elderly who worked when they were younger to starve when they got old.

Yet another democrat, President Lyndon B. Johnson started Medicare and Medicaid. He signed the Social Security Amendments into law on July 30, 1965. Providing that the poor and elderly could get medical care. He and JFK helped get the Civil Rights act passed so that people of all colors could at least begin to get equal rights.

Men whose objectives closer resembled Jesus than you do were horrible people according to your ilk. That's why people can see through your kind.

According to you. What about murder of children. What does the Bible say about that. Trust me it is not on your side. In the Old Testament God delivered entire nations into Israels hand for sacrificing babies. How about changing his law in reference to marriage that he invented being between 1 man and 1 woman. I know your twisted view of the Word of God twists what it says to fit your reality, but the Word of God cannot be changed. It is the same from Genisis to Revelation. Try reading it straight thru sometime you may have a different understanding than taking 1 line and twisting that lines meaning.

I do not support abortion and therefore have never paid for an abortion or advised anyone to get an abortion. Unlike you I don't care who marries who. That's none of my business. We all have to answer for our own life. I have my own beliefs but unlike you I fully understand I have no right to inflict my religious beliefs on the whole of society. You keep using Old Testament scripture to make a point. Do you eat pork or seafood? Do you keep the Sabbath on Saturday as is commanded? If you're going to break out the Old Testament to claim some kind of right to inflict your religious beliefs on society, use all of it and not just the parts to support your agenda.

And we both now I'm not "taking 1 line and twisting that lines meaning." Jesus said all that accept him will be saved. He did not say to force religion down anyone's throat.

I see you have chosen to ignore my entire post for the most part because it doesn't serve your purposes. I expected as much.

In this nation we are founded on the principal of freedom of religion. That makes us free of any one religion or being forced into the teachings of one religion. There are nations where they use their religion to control women, to force people into following their beliefs and customs and punish people who don't. From my understanding you hate them. Oh that's right, that's because it's not "your religion". But when it comes to "your religion" you want to do the exact same thing here.

And BTW- The books of the bible are not in chronological order.

And is this what you meant by "taking 1 line and twisting that lines meaning."?

Matthew 25:31-46 King James Version

31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:

32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:

36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.

37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?

39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?

40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

42 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:

43 I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.

44 Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?

45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.

46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Nowhere does it say anyone in those situations should be judged in order to be helped. Nowhere does it say that it should be only through Christian organizations that such people be helped. Don't blame me because your bible is obviously different than mine. But then I don't own a Trump Bible.

Wrong again you do not know your history. This country was founded on Christianity and wrote the constitution around Biblical principles. The Laws our founding Fathers developed came directly from the Book of Deuteronomy. Over have the founded Fathers that signed the Constitution were ordained ministers. They were running from government controlled organized religion to religious freedom. Not freedom from religion.

Again look at your context it is written for a person to do those things as a follower of Christ. No where is it written for government to take anything from people to give to others. You are using those verses out of context to fit an agenda.

Also, as far as your comment about the Old Testament. In the New Testament there is this text below in John that shows that Jesus is the word and was there at the beginning in Genisis 1 so the entire Old Testament is as relevant today as it was yesterday. And as for your pork comment Paul spoke about that and while Jewish people still follow the old covenant the new covenant allows for pork to be eaten. The Old Testament in the Bible is relevant, and the laws show man that we are flawed and need a savior. We no longer are under the old covenant which required sacrificing animals as atonement but rather our savior's sacrifice was enough. So again, read the entire Bible and not pick and choose verses to prove an agenda. Satan can do that he did that when he took Jesus up to be tempted. I don't think you want to be like him.

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

2 The same was in the beginning with God.

3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.

7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.

8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.

9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.

11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Freedom of religion is not from the book of Deuteronomy. Religious freedom insures we all have the right to believe any religion we see fir and not have a single religion or its teachings imposed upon us.

Nowhere is it said that it is wrong when a government is following the message of Jesus in supporting the poor or you should fight against that either.

Several Founding Fathers, most notably John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, explicitly stated that the United States was not founded on Christianity. They deliberately designed the U.S. Constitution to be secular, avoiding references to God or the Bible.

Specific quotes, documents, and sentiments from the founders include:

John Adams (The Treaty of Tripoli): In 1797, under the Adams administration, the United States unanimously ratified the Treaty with Tripoli (a peace pact with Muslim rulers in North Africa). It explicitly stated: "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."

Thomas Jefferson: A champion of the separation of church and state, Jefferson wrote in a letter to the Danbury Baptists that the First Amendment built "a wall of separation between Church & State." In his personal writings, he was highly critical of orthodox Christian doctrines and stripped his own version of the Bible of all supernatural and divine elements.

James Madison: Known as the "Father of the Constitution" and author of the Bill of Rights, Madison consistently fought against state-sponsored religion. He believed mixing religion and government corrupted both, and strongly opposed requiring any religious tests for public office.

George Washington: While a theist, Washington frequently avoided religious jargon in his official duties. During his administration, American diplomat Joel Barlow negotiated the Treaty with Tripoli (including the "not in any sense founded" line), which Washington approved before it was forwarded to the Senate.

Thomas Paine: A prominent intellectual and advocate for the separation of religion and politics, Paine heavily promoted Deism. He denounced the union of church and state, arguing that mingling them inevitably leads to corruption and the loss of individual liberty.

The clearest proof of this intent is found in the supreme law of the land itself. The U.S. Constitution contains two specific clauses that cleave church and state:The First Amendment ensures Congress makes no law "respecting an establishment of religion."

Article VI explicitly states that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."

I'm sorry you have been programmed and convinced otherwise.

Your last post had nothing that pertained to this thread. Now you're just trying to get on your pulpit pretending you understand the gospel.

Go ahead and believe lies all you want.

That would make me no different than you. No thanks.

But tat's now what you call it when faced with facts and truth.