|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 869
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 869 |
Just a wee bit more to add. If you get a gadget or gimmick to work with him a few times, then you want it on tape. You show some wrinkles to force other D's to prepare for it. Complicate their calls a bit more. We have heard it said that some opponents didn't need to do much to prepare for us under Ski. I think you get him into a number of looks. Just putting him on the field should command attention and adjustments. t I agree unless you use him as we used Schwartz where it was obvious what the next play was going to be. If we just stick him in to run a reverse or QB option and teams know that, there isn't an element of surprise. Trick plays don't work if the opponent isn't tricked. I still say it would be a good idea to tell Green report over to coach Jones with the receivers and have him work out there for a day. See if he can catch, which I suspect he can. Maybe just the last 15 minutes of a practice and any voluntary time after practice just to take a look. I think the guy could become a star as a receiver. Note I did say "could", and obviously it wouldn't be overnight. I think his chances at QB are very limited. If Shedufus balls out, he will become our QB of the future. If not, we will draft a QB in the next draft, and he will get all of the attention the next 3-4 years. I don't see much of a window at the position for Green at QB. Taylen Green is a QB. He's always been a QB. They could put 25 plays for red zone opportunites and have him master those 25 plays instead of opening the entire playbook. The problem with this lies in the fact he would not be a viable option for a backup QB, so he would be taking another spot up on the game day roster other than emergency backup QB. So, a lineman, DB, receiver, RB, someone that might contribute due to injuries would be left out of the options. My argument is, too many players are standing on the sidelines waiting for an injury. Taylen Green would be on the roster to maximize red zone production. HE would be more valuable than these extra bodies normally reserved for sideline cheer section. If they determine he can successfully run 25 plays, he's in. If he can't then what are we doing anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,291
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,291 |
Just a note on what I said originally. Complicate opponent preparation a bit by showing them something different. A second QB, one who cab throw/catch/run during a play, especially red zone, can complicate defensive calls. Some potential offense to process and influence and hopefully complicate reactions. Limiting players on the roster isn't savvy IMO. Give the opponent more to consider, more to practice for, steal some prep time. The "surprise" offensive wrinkle is something to pursue a bit. But first the offense has to hurt the opponent in the game. But the rest of the schedule may prepare for it. Scripting Green gadgets or other players' surprises offer some dividend if they take up practice time and give the D more to process. An offense's job is to force the D to perform, to react, to adjust. Not all players are suitable for this, but this kid is.
"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,470
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,470 |
Just a wee bit more to add. If you get a gadget or gimmick to work with him a few times, then you want it on tape. You show some wrinkles to force other D's to prepare for it. Complicate their calls a bit more. We have heard it said that some opponents didn't need to do much to prepare for us under Ski. I think you get him into a number of looks. Just putting him on the field should command attention and adjustments. t I agree unless you use him as we used Schwartz where it was obvious what the next play was going to be. If we just stick him in to run a reverse or QB option and teams know that, there isn't an element of surprise. Trick plays don't work if the opponent isn't tricked. I still say it would be a good idea to tell Green report over to coach Jones with the receivers and have him work out there for a day. See if he can catch, which I suspect he can. Maybe just the last 15 minutes of a practice and any voluntary time after practice just to take a look. I think the guy could become a star as a receiver. Note I did say "could", and obviously it wouldn't be overnight. I think his chances at QB are very limited. If Shedufus balls out, he will become our QB of the future. If not, we will draft a QB in the next draft, and he will get all of the attention the next 3-4 years. I don't see much of a window at the position for Green at QB. Taylen Green is a QB. He's always been a QB. They could put 25 plays for red zone opportunites and have him master those 25 plays instead of opening the entire playbook. The problem with this lies in the fact he would not be a viable option for a backup QB, so he would be taking another spot up on the game day roster other than emergency backup QB. So, a lineman, DB, receiver, RB, someone that might contribute due to injuries would be left out of the options. My argument is, too many players are standing on the sidelines waiting for an injury. Taylen Green would be on the roster to maximize red zone production. HE would be more valuable than these extra bodies normally reserved for sideline cheer section. If they determine he can successfully run 25 plays, he's in. If he can't then what are we doing anyway? Who cares if he has always been a QB? I agree, it's about getting the most out of a player. The guy is a dynamic playmaker with his legs, not his arm. If he was a statue QB, his arm wouldn't have carried him very far. I just don't see a window of opportunity for the guy to become the next great QB for the Browns for the reasons I mentioned before. If Shedufus doesn't play to the level that makes us decide we don't need to draft a QB early in the draft we aren't going to all of a sudden think Green is the guy and give him the next 4 years to be our great QB. We will draft someone who will be given that opportunity. We will still be able to use Green for some of the situations you mention for this season, but we don't need to be grooming him to be a back-up QB. Either Sanders grabs the role this season or we will draft someone to take that role. I agree, Green won't be a solid back-up this season. I do think Gabriel can. I think many have written him off a bit too soon. If Green is a take a roster position, I would rather see him take a roster sport from Tillman or Corley or whoever. Heck, Cribbs was a QB his whole career before he got to the NFL. He didn't get QB snaps unless it was in a situation much as you described. Heinz Ward was a QB until a team not far away decided he needed to be on the field as a WR. That worked out pretty good.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,597
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,597 |
He said he would only play QB and the Browns also said they drafted him to be a QB. If I were him and a team drafted me while telling me a lie I doubt I would be willing to go along with it.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,876
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,876 |
I would stick to trying to develop him as a QB. As we all know he has off the chart physical skills. It may take a while but it could be worth it. He can be our #3 for a few years.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 869
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 869 |
The thing is, you keep saying over and over you don't think he has an opportunity to be a QB...but you want him to be a wide receiver. A position he admitted he has zero experience in and zero ambition to learn. What open opportunity do you see him sliding into there?
The browns starting WRs are "probably"
Jerry Jeudy KC Concepcion Denzel Boston
Those in the know are saying that Isaiah Bond is very impressive this offseason. He will be #4 with a lot of playing time. I'll be surprised if Cedric Tillman isn't the 5th Tylan Wallace is most likely the 6th guy for punt return duties
We could also go with 5 WRs on the roster, if KC is doing returns.
I could see a development WR role if he went to the practice squad, but there is no guarantee he will make it to the practice squad.
If he is going to make the actual roster this season, I only see that path through package QB plays or a lot of injuries.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,597
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,597 |
I would stick to trying to develop him as a QB. As we all know he has off the chart physical skills. It may take a while but it could be worth it. He can be our #3 for a few years. I don't know about that. 6th round QB's don't usually get three years to develop. Potential and athletic ability are not nearly enough to be an NFL QB. It takes much more than that. Actually the QB position is more about what's behind the ears than athletic ability. It's certainly an attribute in the package however. I have no idea if he has the ability to mentally process and evolve into an actual NFL QB but if that were strong possibility I don't think he would have been sitting there in round 6. But who knows? As of now he would certainly be of value to come in on QB packages. The RPO would be right up his alley and keep opposing D's off guard. He most certainly could develop into more but I don't think you take three years to try and develop him into an actual QB. Could he develop into more? Most certainly. But I don't believe you invest three years waiting to find out.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk NFL Draft 2026 Pick #182 Arkansas QB Taylen Green
|
|