DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus The Dems... again

*sniff sniff*

Anyone else smell dog$hit and diaper rash? Damn, that's pungent.

That's your upper lip you are smelling.

I’m betting the dems won’t dance on Mitch’s grave like MAGA did on RBG’s

That's quite the spin, but nice try.

#LipstickOnThePig

Canadian Democrats?

Looks like hubby should have put a little leash on that nose ring and led her away from stupidity.

Oh wait, never mind, he's the loon that posts on insta wishing for the deaths of President Trump and his family — including the "little kids".

Typical Trumpian branding. "Put a leash on that thar woman!"

That's pretty sad when you have to post and comment on a Canadian woman in a thread about Democrats. But not at all surprising.

Hey, at least you're focusing on a white immigrant. That's a refreshing change of pace even though this isn't a thread about immigrants.

ohhh Frank said it??? Must be true.

Dems sign pledge to uphold capitalism signifying a real fracture in the democratic base. At least all democrats aren't lunatics.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...are-capitalist-not-socialist/ar-AA24IL3j

Frank Luntz gets his information primarily from conducting qualitative focus groups and quantitative tracking polls with specific segments of the American electorate.

As a veteran political pollster and communications strategist, Luntz specialized in gathering small, curated panels of voters—such as undecided voters, independents, or "flipped" voters—to analyze their exact language, emotional drivers, and reactions to current political events.

Luntz's Methodology

✅ Dial-Testing Focus Groups: Luntz frequently utilizes "dial-testing," where focus group participants use handheld dials to rate their real-time reactions to political speeches, debates, or policy actions second-by-second.
✅ Targeted Voter Panels: To get the specific insights you quoted, Luntz routinely convenes panels explicitly made up of swing voters (e.g., people who voted for Barack Obama or Joe Biden in previous cycles but switched to Donald Trump, or vice versa).
✅ Media and Corporate Partnerships: He frequently runs these focus groups and shares his findings through major media networks like CNN, Fox News, and BBC News, as well as private research presentations for business and policy organizations.

When he states that flipped voters "love the pace of change," he is not guessing or reporting on broad national data; he is directly quoting and summarizing the qualitative feedback he observed from these live, interactive voter sessions.

#MuStBeAmAgAfAnBoY

Dr. Frank Luntz is President of Frank I. Luntz & Associates, a survey research and consulting firm, whose clients include Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, the Reform Party of Canada, the Democratic Party of Slovenia, and National Geographic. Dr. Luntz has also been active in international elections, having served as the political consultant to the Likud Party of Israel in 1988. Currently, Dr. Luntz is an Adjunct Assistant Professor at the University of Pennsylvania and also teaches for the Graduate School of Political Management at George Washington University, and regularly conducts a \Humor

Likud, officially the Likud – National Liberal Movement, is Israel's major right-wing and nationalist political party.

Seems way more qualified than a rando on DawgTalkers.

As well as the rando who posted that crap trying to pretend Frank Lutz wasn't a right winger. Don't blame me because I had to show people that isn't true. Some randos actually give legitimate news sources to support their positions. Some randos use other randos on Twitter.

The "position" is the poll, dimwit. It doesn't matter if Joe the Plummer posted it on Twitter. You guys look pretty silly when you constantly kill the messenger when a post from Twitter is filled with facts. The poll itself is factual.

So, please explain to the class how someone was "trying to pretend he's not a right winger". Or is that just something you pulled out of your ___ to change the debate?

Hopefully people realize that the way in which you ask questions in a poll directly affect the result of the poll. I know people are locked into the SM media feeds for their "news" - but polls can be and are manipulated depending on whether they are right/center(neutral)/left leaning.

The poll is factual? Is that why people such as yourself have been saying for so long that polls are meaningless, most often wrong and can't be trusted? Right up until one of yours makes a poll?

What was it you said about hypocrisy earlier?

The questions in this poll were slanted? Where are they, I didn't actually see the wording, please point me in the right direction.

You're talking about two different things (again) and then using that false narrative to call me a hypocrite.

I've never said polls should be trusted and I didn't say that about this one. I have said that at times they can be meaningless; and never said this one is meaningful.

I simply said the result of the polls are facts. So, unless you can show us where Frankie conducts polls and then misreports the results, you're barking up the wrong tree here.

Was this a fake poll? Is Frankie not qualified to conduct polls?

Your reading comprehension is slipping more and more. From not understanding that "what he says" was a reference to what Trump was going to say in a thread about Trump's imminent speech - to trying to suggest that an accurate post commenting on how Polls can be and are are manipulated and making a post claiming I said the questions in this poll were slanted.

1+1 = 3 according to you.