Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
FATE #2142115 08/30/26 04:34 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,745
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,745
I think it makes perfect sense - and it definitely has a big impact. Although - with that said I still think the coaching is also playing a roll. I don't know for sure but I would suspect that in similar situations/games in previous years with KS, there were more penalties. That's just my gut and it could be influenced by my belief Stefanski didn't do much to hold players accountable.

But it's one game and it's preseason - small sample size, it may all go to hell Week 1 proper when we're facing pressure and can't open holes or stop the pass rush etc .... and players have to start to compensate for being out performed by their counter part or being overwhelmed etc.

I guess as far as the Gabriel and the Preseason game, the safest thing I can say is that while it doesn't mean much at all, it left a better taste in my mouth than some of the stuff I've seen preseason.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
mgh888 #2142116 08/30/26 08:58 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,625
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,625
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by bugs
What did I see? I saw a well-executed game plan. The second-, third-, and fourth-string players knew their assignments and performed with few penalties. When was the last time we ever saw that in regular or preseason? Kudos to the coaching staff.

I think this sums it up. I'm not sure how much more you can take away from this preseason game ... I didn't want to slam Watson for his poor air yards stat that someone plucked, I wouldn't want to give too much credence to Gabriel playing well against a bunch of back ups. I liked and enjoyed watching that - but I take more out of it based on the discipline and penalties.

The two things you want to see out of back-ups on back-ups is to identify the guys who look clear and above the others. If they do that they have proven to be at minimum better players than other back-ups which makes you think the player could become a good starter. Gabe was clearly better than anyone else on the field when he played.

The next, out of QBs is how they managed the O. He looked like a seasoned Vet out there, in total command. It couldn't have been any better, or at least much if total perfection is what we are looking for. We have to remember, Gabriel has less NFL experience than Shedufus. To this point Sanders hasn't looked anywhere near as comfortable.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #2142118 08/30/26 09:27 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,745
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,745
Good points.

I guess I like Gabriel - better than Watson (duh!) and Sanders. I'd like to see him given every opportunity and think he's got a better future as a long term Browns backup than Sanders ... but I don't want to use one preseason game to assert that it means more than it did. Your points are spot on.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
mgh888 #2142166 08/30/26 03:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,625
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,625
Originally Posted by mgh888
Good points.

I guess I like Gabriel - better than Watson (duh!) and Sanders. I'd like to see him given every opportunity and think he's got a better future as a long term Browns backup than Sanders ... but I don't want to use one preseason game to assert that it means more than it did. Your points are spot on.

No doubt 1 games doesn't mean much, but it is a stepping stone. We'll see where it goes from here.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Preseason Gameday vs New England What I Saw...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5