So you think who the very term you used was used by and tried to introduce it as a diagnosis into law is "unrelated to the topic"?
I understand. You seem to think you can just create made up scenarios with no basis in facts in topics to create some false sense of doubt that as of now doesn't even exist but something that actually involves a term you used in this discussion isn't. Brilliant!

But when I post a factual account concerning the very term you yourself used it's not related and contemptible.
I don't care what you and the trumpians on this board think because I know exactly who and what you are. Since you're the one who brought up being a contemptible hypocrite.
Your meltdown has officially left the launching pad. I hope it doesn't explode like a Space X Rocket the same way it has done in the past.
And you call things I write word salad.
If using a term means you are tied to everything said or committed by anyone else who ever used the term, you can essentially connect anything to any topic. Trying to tie the sexual predation to me was a contemptible act.
When I mentioned "Trump Derangement Syndrome," I explicitly stated that I find the term annoying. Yet, your actions tend to fit a semblance of that idea.
Unfortunately, you do seem to care because otherwise you wouldn't feel the need to lie so much. Your Dunning-Kruger also seems to be flaring up again because you don't actually "know exactly who and what you [we] are."
Projecting your meltdown doesn't really bother me. People have eyes, though most of them don't bother reading your words, so they're not going to see them anyways. I probably should stop quoting you so others don't have to be subjected to them when they've got you on ignore. I suppose that's rather inconsiderate of me.
Enjoy your imagined petty fiefdom. I'm gonna take a break from the boards for awhile. I don't think continuing to interact with you is worth my time, and I find too many of the posts here are yours.