|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109 |
If these were accurate, I would be thrilled. However, I highly doubt that they are. Every year there are some supposed accurate ratings that come out before the IGN ones in July and the only ones that are accurate are the IGN ones.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
I've been waiting a long time for the Browns to have a good rating on Madden. I might have to find myself a console soon. I haven't bought a Madden in 3-4 years (haven't had a console for 2).
I didn't see Holly's name on the defense. Did they already take him off?
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/Punchsmack/punch.gif) “...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109 |
P.S. Try adding a bracket after the img in your sig. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,839 Likes: 11
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,839 Likes: 11 |
These are not right...
And i'll tell u why....
Sean Jones will be higher than 87...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Raven
|
|
Raven
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691 |
Is Brett on the cover this year???
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
Yes.
Someone on this board said John Madden will also be on the cover this year...but you won't be able to see him cause he'll be so far up Brett's behind. Ha ha ha...don't remember who said that. I LOL'd.
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248 |
Me. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
Thanks. 
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,283
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,283 |
Quote:
Eagles 91
Bucs 91
Vikings 90
Browns 88
Yeah right. Not being a homer, but the Bucs 91! Please!
"My country is the world, and my religion is to do good" Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531 |
IF these are accurate, it might make playing online with the Browns worth my while this time around.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
Quote:
IF these are accurate, it might make playing online with the Browns worth my while this time around.
And you may see non-Browns fans playing with them too.
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223 |
Steelers are 94???? Come on.
They made no improvements, and didn't warrant a 94 last season.
On the other hand, if these indeed are accurate, there's some nice scores on there. BE a 95, and Winslow the highest at 97. Nice! And our OL doesn't have anything under an 88.
![[Linked Image from pic18.picturetrail.com]](http://pic18.picturetrail.com/VOL905/3216203/6567769/349897772.jpg) "The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109 |
JT was also a 97. But once again, I highly doubt these are accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,435 |
Thomas is a 97 too. That's got to be the highest for a 2nd year player ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Quote:
P.S. Try adding a bracket after the img in your sig.
Funny you mention that, because ive realized it but cant figure out where to edit it eventhough ive done it before.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Quote:
These are not right...
And i'll tell u why....
Sean Jones will be higher than 87...
They are right and yes Sean Jones should be higher. Atleast a 89.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,946 Likes: 763
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,946 Likes: 763 |
Click here: https://www.dawgtalkers.net/editbasic.php?Cat=0 and scroll down to the box that says Signature
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Thanks for the help, didnt work though it said error to big, I dont see how because im pretty sure its smaller than DeepThreats.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Quote:
Quote:
Eagles 91
Bucs 91
Vikings 90
Browns 88
Yeah right. Not being a homer, but the Bucs 91! Please!
They were in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,435 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Eagles 91
Bucs 91
Vikings 90
Browns 88
Yeah right. Not being a homer, but the Bucs 91! Please!
They were in the playoffs.
the eagles weren't
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,982 Likes: 16
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,982 Likes: 16 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Eagles 91
Bucs 91
Vikings 90
Browns 88
Yeah right. Not being a homer, but the Bucs 91! Please!
They were in the playoffs.
In the NFC,,,,,,Cleveland could have went 13-3 in the NFC.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Yeah, Philly should be about the same as Cleveland.
Cleveland is straight stacked in this game. The OLine is gonna abuse people, 97, 95, 89, 88, 93 ?!?! Cant believe they made Shaffer a 93 and also Hadnot a 88!
Something else that has really shock is I thought since Leon Hall had 5 INTs they would make him something crazy like a 88, but not only is EW rated higher but Mcdonald as well. Bout time we gotta lttle love.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109 |
Anyone else notice that Bodden is rated an 89. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 415 Likes: 3
1st String
|
|
1st String
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 415 Likes: 3 |
You must have been typing it wrong or something....anyway, I fixed it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,839 Likes: 11
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,839 Likes: 11 |
Quote:
Anyone else notice that Bodden is rated an 89.
nope.. He's not a brown anymore.. who cares!! 
Did you notice what Rogers was rated?? Ever seen a Brown defensive lineman rated that high? lol...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109 |
I did and I haven't.  I do however, think that C. Williams and DA should have been ranked higher, but you can't win them all.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Quote:
You must have been typing it wrong or something....anyway, I fixed it for you.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Quote:
Anyone else notice that Bodden is rated an 89.
Yeah, I saw that. Bodden did make some big plays last season but he got burnt sooo many times it wasnt funny. He got used by Davard Darling(blt). Anyone know what Leigh was rated last season ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Quote:
IF these are accurate, it might make playing online with the Browns worth my while this time around.
I was already big n nasty with the Browns, Vickers fullback dive can not be stopped!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 285
2nd String
|
|
2nd String
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 285 |
Quote:
Pretty good. One thing I noticed, Shaun Smith is 5 points higher than ANYONE on the Bengals defense... rofl
http://www.pastapadre.com/2645/madde...d-team-ratings
My cousin Jacob Bell of the Rams is a 94 and Orlando Pace is a 93!!! Dig It!!! Faneca only got a 95...If this is true, I'M PUMPED for him and the Browns good ratings finally...
"Awww Nawww Big Slimdog!!!"
-Eminem, "B**** Please Pt. II"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,322 Likes: 79
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,322 Likes: 79 |
Yes, usually they have most of our guys at about 82, if these are true it's great news. But starting with this Madden I will wait to see what kind of reviews it's getting before I buy the darn thing.
Find what you love and let it kill you.
-Charles Bukowski
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531 |
88 for DA should be just fine. You can play well with any QB above 85 usually.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109 |
I must need new contacts, because DA's rating looks like an 83 to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 112
Practice Squad
|
|
Practice Squad
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 112 |
Hopefully the ratings are at least close. I bought a Wii back in January and wanted to buy Madden 08. Rented it and the Browns were not rated very good at all. Decided to wait and get 09 since they should be rated higher.
I might have to go and put my deposit down on the game.
Signing Steinbach - $49.5 million
Signing Lewis - $5 million
Drafting Joe Thomas and Brady Quinn - millions more
Restoring the Browns to champions - priceless.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223 |
Tasty! Happy Birthday man!
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,839 Likes: 11
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,839 Likes: 11 |
I only trust IGN's ratings... but these are fun to look at until July though... lol
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
I can't argue with the ratings, but i think Todd Sitrin is going to get in trouble...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Rookie
|
|
OP
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25 |
Well they've graphed out QBs, RB, WRs, TEs, OLine and the only change I see is that Shaffer isn't a 93. He's now listed as a 89 and Hadnot was a 88 and is now listed as a 90. Thomas 97 Steinbach 95 Fraley 89 Hadnot 90 Shaffer 89 Still looks good to me. http://www.sportsgamer.com/content/1613/madden-09-offensive-line-ratings/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,333
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,333 |
Do you guys realize these aren't the official ratings?
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Fantasy & Gaming Madden 09 Ratings
|
|
![[Linked Image from i270.photobucket.com]](http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj107/lukensds/JonesandPool.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]](https://i.ibb.co/6WV79RV/Browns-Coach-Sig.png)
![[Linked Image from fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net]](https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/276870_6711658857_1403067853_q.jpg)