Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
That would be unbelievable if we could full that off!!!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
I've searched the internet all over, I can't find a single thing about it. My guess is that it is more of a wish then a rumor turned into a rumor by a radio host.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
More than likely, you know ESPN would be all over it if it were true.


Cleveland Browns, Space Browns
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
clwb419 Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Quote:

I've searched the internet all over, I can't find a single thing about it. My guess is that it is more of a wish then a rumor turned into a rumor by a radio host.




Ditto. Nothing to be found anywhere. Seems too good of a trade to be true, so likely it isn't...

Besides, the trade engines (not that they are perfect) do not allow either one .

Last edited by Referee2; 06/28/08 07:23 AM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Yeah, you guys are right ...


let's shoot the messenger.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,065
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,065
Post deleted by Referee2

Nas320 #282101 06/27/08 09:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
clwb419 Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Good question, and I'm not sure about the exception.

And I was just working with what was on the rumor. Of course either team could add a lower salary player and make it work out.

Per Davis, I agree. The other thing is that I've heard him referred to as Baron Avis because he has no "D". On this team, that is a no-no.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,996
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,996
Post deleted by Referee2


[Linked Image from media.scout.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:

Are people really expecting us to find a big-name college superstar in the 2nd round of the draft?




Not me. Maybe a position of need would have been nice. SG Weems is a high flyer that could have gotten some minutes. Dude cant create off the dribble though to take some pressure off of Lebron in a half court offense. Dribbles too high and cant dribble with his left hand.

As of now, the Cavs have one shooting Guard..Sasha. Brown was the starter late in the season and he is an unrestricted FA. Lebron and Wally can play guard but they are natural SFs.

I would have had no problem with the 2 Kansas big man, if they didnt draft one in the first round. One of the cavs needs was a young front court player....but not 3. I was pimping a couple in the first round if Courtney Lee wasnt available. That gives them a tatal of 8 front court players(pretrade). Z, Joe Smith, Andy, Wallace, Dwayne Jones (who wont make the roster), Hickson, and the two Kansas big men. If they would have drafted Courtney Lee,I would have had no problem with the two Kansas big men. Now a trade of Andy, Wallace, or Smith is a must, and whose to say that they will find fair value for a position of need?

Nas320 #282104 06/27/08 09:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,281
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,281





Let's not worry about the "perfect" fit. Like you said, he is a talent. Talent is talent, especially in basketball, and playing with LBJ, I have the feeling he would fit in just fine..

You mention he likes to run, keep in mind LBJ WANTS to run MORE, and has been saying it for years.

Last edited by Referee2; 06/28/08 07:29 AM.

I heart winning
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,065
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,065
Post deleted by Referee2

Nas320 #282106 06/27/08 09:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
S
Legend
Offline
Legend
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
i think baron davis would be fine...

he would probably drive mike brown nuts, with the constant pushing of the ball, and the shots early in the shot clock, but to be honest, i think you really need both of those at times... you have the best open court player in the league, possibly in the existence of the nba, why not take advantage of that...

baron davis is not a defender, and if we did acquire him, you would almost be forced to start sasha aside him in the backcourt, because otherwise, you'll be cut and shred by the better backcourts in the nba, and probably some of the not-so-better backcourts in the nba, and take a look at the backcourts in our own division, billups/hamilton, redd/williams, and now derrick rose/whoever the bulls throw out there

not to mention tj ford, who's pretty solid when healthy...

but to be honest, i know baron davis doesn't sound like a mike brown guy, but tony parker doesn't exactly lock down on his guy either, and they run the same system we do, as long as we have sasha (who defended great in the boston series, that's about all he did) as well as lebron, who can guard a 2-man, we would be alright...

i heard this rumor too, from a friend, who probably heard it on knr like all you guys...

it just seems lopsided, i could see this deal being pulled in january, but in june?

but i would take it in a heartbeat, harrington or not...

i think our offense could use a bit of a ballhog, and a guy that likes to run...

people don't take notice to it, but san antonio does quite a bit of running... they do it when they need to, and they do it almost as well as any of the teams that feature that style...

Nas320 #282107 06/28/08 02:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,186
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,186
If I was golden state I would want gibson, varejo, and wally. But if detroit offered billiups and sheed, I wouldn't think twice about making that trade. if you get those 2, the warriors are title contenders. you can't say the same if they traded with us for the aforementioned players. their starting 5 would be
billiups
ellis
jackson
wallace
biedris.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,186
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,186
I also clicked on the link on sportsline, and it looked liked some fan was making trade scenarios for the heck of it. I didn't see any credible sources confirming the rumor.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,445
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,445
Constant pushing is because it's GS...

The Cavs have no half court offense...It consists of waisting 10 seconds and givin' it up to Bron at the 3 line...And we all know what happens then...More times than not a BAD shot...

Look...We need to make a move for a BACKCOURT player...And we're gonna have to give a lil' defense for some offense...So be it...Pavlovick ain't gonna cut it...We need 20 a game from someone back there...It's what we've needed for years...

There's 2 guys apparently available...Davis gives us the option of letting West go...There's 20+ a night AND 7 and 8 Assists...A bonafide ball handler who can finally get Bron OFF the ball and posted up...This offense would take off with Davis here...We get that distributor who can score and penetrate and dish...

Redd...If we go with him we MUST keep West...

Only question to me is do we try and do it NOW or wait till the deadline...

We land 1 of those 2 backcourt guys and we immediately jump into contention...And Bron's happy...

The beauty of it is...We can give up a future 1st rounder and Andy and Zerb's...And still make another move at the deadline with some of these other expirings...If it's the right deal at that time we might just have to sweeten the pot and bite the bullet by adding Gibson to the trade package...He's a solid 6th but by no means is Gibson irreplaceable...

With Bron and Davis or Redd we can do without Gibson IF we can replace that shooting off the bench and get another POTENTIAL ALL STAR in the Gibson deal...If we can do that then we MUST include Gibson in a deadline deal...It will put us over the top...

We're set up to be able to make the moves...Only question is what moves are we gonna end up making...


Go Browns!!!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,996
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,996
If that link from cbssportsline is where WKNR got their info from, then they are a little slow. That link was posted in May and the last response to it also looks like May.


[Linked Image from media.scout.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 731
R
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 731
RUMORS If you cannot cite a source when posting information to the board, please do not post it at all. Saying that you saw something on television or heard it on the radio is not sufficient as a valid source. Rumors do not lend to valid discussion and will be removed when seen by a moderator.


Some of you need to remember this to avoid a vacation from the board.


I see and hear everything. Now where did I put my white cane, and my hearing aid?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:


Some of you need to remember this to avoid a vacation from the board.




There is a vacation ideas thread on this board

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,281
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,281
DinDayton,

I agree 100%. People keep mentioning Brand and other PFs, but I am with you on this.

we need this scoring from the backcourt. I even remember telling someone on the board that sometimes you need to give up a little D to get the O put you over the top. Also, remember that any guy we obtain will also become a better defender in our system. It just works that way in the NBA, especially when a guy knows he can come to a team and contend for a ring....

One of the main reasons I want the backcourt guy, is that he can take care of the ball and game when LB has to sit. When we need to sit LB I want to be able and be more comfortable with someone else being able to put the ball in the bucket for the 8 or so minutes LB spends on the bench during the game. I also think the backcourt player is the best fit, since we have traditionally had scoring drought problems. Elton Brand and other bigs are great, but it's harder for them to put their stamp on the game in quick spurts since they don't have the ball in their hands as much.


I heart winning
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Which is why I really wanted Courtney Lee. Plus, that dude does play good defense.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
S
Legend
Offline
Legend
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Quote:

DinDayton,

I agree 100%. People keep mentioning Brand and other PFs, but I am with you on this.

we need this scoring from the backcourt. I even remember telling someone on the board that sometimes you need to give up a little D to get the O put you over the top. Also, remember that any guy we obtain will also become a better defender in our system. It just works that way in the NBA, especially when a guy knows he can come to a team and contend for a ring....

One of the main reasons I want the backcourt guy, is that he can take care of the ball and game when LB has to sit. When we need to sit LB I want to be able and be more comfortable with someone else being able to put the ball in the bucket for the 8 or so minutes LB spends on the bench during the game. I also think the backcourt player is the best fit, since we have traditionally had scoring drought problems. Elton Brand and other bigs are great, but it's harder for them to put their stamp on the game in quick spurts since they don't have the ball in their hands as much.




i agree about what you said with players coming to cleveland and being better defenders...

wally sczberbiak is no bruce bowen, and the constant thing we heard was that he'd be a liability, mike brown was able to use him effectively enough where he actually played very well at times, and was never horrible on defense...

i would take 5 average defenders all committed to playing defense for 48 minutes, then to have 1 nasty defender (bowen, garnett, etc), team defense will always prevail, just like it did in the boston series, as great as kg was, the whole team was commited, you could just tell by their body langauge, they were getting it done on that end of the floor first and foremost...

i have to disagree about elton brand, his type are few and far between... he would make a huge difference with the cavs... having z and brand on the floor creates huge problems (not to mention lebron) that would be the best frontcourt in the league, and i think we could get by on the backcourt we have, it may not be strong, but when you have lebron, who we all know what he is capable of, elton brand, who can play with his back to the basket, and get the ugly points, and z, who has a good inside/outside game and is a great offensive rebounder, we could dominate in the frontcourt, and the backcourt wouldn't look so bad

our frontcourt play against boston was bad, lebron struggled, all of z's points came outside of the paint, and ben wallace obviously can't score the basketball, joe smith was really the only guy getting anything done... and his was in limited time...

like i said, you can argue whether we need a 2 guard or a power forward, but you cannot go wrong with either

i just disagree with you that brand would in fact make a huge difference, and would put this team over the top, no doubt.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 468
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 468
IMHO , unfortunately the Cavs will probably Not be able to acquire a bonefide Stud to pair with Lebron....However, over the course of the next 2 seasons other NBA teams who already have that bonefide Stud will put themselves in a position to make an offer to Lebron....$ isn't Jame's main focus , winning a NBA Title and becoming part of a dynasty is....History has shown that when opportunity presents itself , the Cavs have Not been known as a franchise who steps up and takes advantage....That said I would be (Happily) surprised IF in the end Lebron remains and eventually wins an NBA Title with the Cavs ....


The Mammal
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
S
Legend
Offline
Legend
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Quote:

IMHO , unfortunately the Cavs will probably Not be able to acquire a bonefide Stud to pair with Lebron....




what makes you say that?

we have 30+ million in expiring contracts for this year and/or 32 million in cap space for a year from now

either way, we'll have a chance at getting the best players on the market...

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,281
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,281
I do not doubt that Brand would come in and make a Big difference, but I do not feel that we would be "put over the top" if we got him. When I say "put over the top" I mean a REAL threat to win it all.

Look, we didn't lose to Boston because of our frontcourt. We lost the series cause we couldnt score enough points. Wally and Sasha were TERRIBLE in game 7. I remember in game 1 we pulled LB out when we were up by like 8 with 10 minutes to go in the second quarter. The game was tied in about a minute and a half. WE CAN"T SCORE WHEN HE IS OUT OF THE GAME AGAINST THE CONTENDERS. Elton Brand is not going to help that out as much as a proven backcourt scorer. These guys we talk about (Redd and Baron) SCORE points and can go for 40 ANY night they step on the floor. They also have taken and made game winners throughout their careers.

I love Brands game, but I just have a hard time believing that he will weather the storm and score the points like these backcourt guys will when we NEED it most...

JMO


I heart winning
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
S
Legend
Offline
Legend
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
there's not doubt in my mind he'd put us over the top, his kind are rare in the nba...

and how can you say our horrible frontcourt play didn't cost us a shot at boston?

lebron was held in check in games 1,2, and 5, and really only went off in game 7...

z was not able to do anything in the paint...

our frontcourt play was just as bad as our backcourt play...

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,281
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,281
I am leaving LB out when talking about the Boston series. I am talking about the other 4 players around him....

I also am not talking in theories or any of that crap...

I am talking about what my eyes see when I watch the games. Our defense is our key, like we have said a million times, it will almost always keep us in playoff games. When I watch the Celtics series, my eyes tell me that Garnett may have matched up well with Elton Brand. Plug in Redd and I cant say that Ray Allen could have contained him with Pierce having to stay true on LB.

The NBA is all about matchups, and its MUCH easier to expose a backcourt matchup than a frontcourt matchup. Keep in mind your bigs get points just off the fact that your backcourt guys can get to the rim. There is a reason the backcourt players are the guys that go for 40+ more often. In your thinking, RASHEED should absolutely ABUSE us everytime he laces it up against the Cavs..


Another example, look at last years finals. We didnt lose the series due to Tim Duncan. We lost the series cause we couldnt contain Tony Parker at all. He was going to the rim, shooting, whatever. We were lost trying to stop him, and couldn't. The guy was hitting jumpers, so making us come out on him, then he would blow by....


I heart winning
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Cavs & NBA Draft

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5