|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
Once again we're hearing about the possibility of teams signing Steinbach as a LT.
Where the heck is this talk coming from? Any opinions out there on moving him over?
I know he's played LT, G, and C in spells - but the guy is listed at 6' 6" and 290 lbs? Was a TE in the past, so he's athletic - right?
This talk means two things to me.
1 - IF ANY team wants him to play LT, we won't be able to afford him as an OG 2 - IF we pick him up, look for savage to justify his salary based on the new cap and to insist we plan to use him at guard whether we really do or not to keep leverage in the draft
I don't think we'll go after him anyway - but being able to play OG, C, and OT is pretty rare and there's a price tag on that type of flexibility.
Especially in our current OL situation.
Depending on how the draft goes, along with Fraley and Tucker - this guy could go about anywhere.
Opinions?
Can't say I've watched him much as a pro.
Is he a great interior lineman who'd be an average at best LT or could he truly play the LT position?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,678
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,678 |
I don't really know the guy having never really paid much attention......but at this point....I would say darn near anything is possible.
If we signed him, I would just as soon keep him at guard where he has been playing, but that is just my opinion.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 |
There is a reason he plays guard. Remember that.
We have an average LT eeer RT in schaeffer. So unless he signs as a guard, forget it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
Steinbach sucked at LT thats why they made the move to the rookie LT from LSU.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
Quote:
Steinbach sucked at LT thats why they made the move to the rookie LT from LSU.
Didn't he play LT against us this year when their regular was down?
Maybe I'm remembering a different game....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
Quote:
If we signed him, I would just as soon keep him at guard where he has been playing, but that is just my opinion.
Yeah - he's an all pro center and guard, right?. Sounds similar to Bentley. Would sure provide us with some flexibility while we do the OL shuffle..... 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
I am pretty sure he did. Palmer was taking a pretty good beating that game but still managed to torch us lol
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
Quote:
There is a reason he plays guard. Remember that.
We have an average LT eeer RT in schaeffer. So unless he signs as a guard, forget it.
I'm coming more from the angle that we don't have control over who's available for us in the draft. We'd over pay for him, to be sure, but assuming he's better than any LT, OG, C or even possibly RT on the team - he'd give us a lot of options depending on how the rest of the off-season worked out.
Sure - maybe ideally he'd be a guard, but our OL is far from ideal as it is 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
Quote:
I am pretty sure he did. Palmer was taking a pretty good beating that game but still managed to torch us lol
Hmmm...
Can't find game stats on hurries or QB hits. Wimbley got him once and McGinest got to him twice. Just the fact that they put him there at all kinda peaks my interest.
I'm not talking about a replacement for Thomas, but as an alternative if Thomas doesn't fall to us.
I'm not as high on Thomas as many on here are, but he sure seems to be the safest pick if he's available.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 |
No argument we should sign him, and pay him well to get him here, but play LT., No thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Once again we're hearing about the possibility of teams signing Steinbach as a LT. Where the heck is this talk coming from? Any opinions out there on moving him over? No I wouldn't move him there..he's better in space than on a island..and when he played there against the Browns , it showed as he was too slow to slide outside to contain the pass rush. He doesn't always bend enough and he loses leverage because of his narrow hips and lack of a big base..thats what you need at LT to be able to handle the bullrushers over therel. .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
I'm not as high on Thomas as many on here are, but he sure seems to be the safest pick if he's available.
a tackle that doesnt run block well, is one year removed from a blown out knee and has short arms. That isnt exactly a safe pick lol
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 |
Quote:
a tackle that doesnt run block well, is one year removed from a blown out knee and has short arms. That isnt exactly a safe pick lol
I will agree with this logic, and I will trust Phil savage's decision making for his first round pick. I do think that it is time to make a statement that we are committed to fixing our main problem via the draft this year. I have no problem with NOT taking thomas if we get the BPA, but if we then turn around and go BPA for every other pick.
I will whine and cry and tell you all "I told you so" when Thomas is a pro bowler. jk
Seriously we need players everywhere, but the O-line needs a fixing more than any other area.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
Quote:
I'm not as high on Thomas as many on here are, but he sure seems to be the safest pick if he's available.
a tackle that doesnt run block well, is one year removed from a blown out knee and has short arms. That isnt exactly a safe pick lol
There are at least some questions around every player in the top 5 except Calvin. Him being available at #3 or #4 would be a shock.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/scoutingreports/ot/joethomas.html Joe Thomas Height: 6-8 | Weight: 313 | 40-Time: 5.00
Official Bio
Strengths: An excellent athlete for the position...Has outstanding feet...Great size with long arms...Very mobile and agile...Displays great balance and gets set quickly...Able to pull, slide and block in space...Still has the frame to bulk up and add some more weight...Technically sound, instinctive and very smart with top intangibles...Rare prospect who can legitimately play the crucial left tackle position at the pr Where's the short arm thing come from? And like any knee injury it's generally the second year removed that the player shows whether he's back or not..07 would be the second year..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
I would also try and make a trade with the Eagles to acquire Max Jean Gilles. They are deep in OL and and have a need at linebacker. Chaun Thompson  lol
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456 |
Quote:
I'm not as high on Thomas as many on here are, but he sure seems to be the safest pick if he's available.
a tackle that doesnt run block well, is one year removed from a blown out knee and has short arms. That isnt exactly a safe pick lol
Its has been stated posted and reposted that Thomas does not have short arms. Im almost positive you have been a part of those threads. Someone posted I think it was 3 major scouting reports that said he had long arms. Im only posting this in case Im wrong and you didnt see or know this and slso for anyone who may not have seen those threads.
If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
I am not impressed with his arm length and I question draftcountdown on a lot of their scouting reports. His combine measurements will decide this but i will put money on him being very very close to Gallery in this area.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
Yeah - if the questions are well justified - the player's stock should drop as time passes. Thomas has the knee and questions about his athleticism (yes OL freaks - he's athletic, but top 5 athletic is the debate for what its worth so don't go there  ) Peterson injuries, running style at NFL level (too upright) Quinn - take your pick Russell - where to I start? Calvin's pretty clean from what I've heard Wanna take a guess on how many of these guys actually go top 5 when all is said and done  Its a LONG way to draft weekend...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832 |
A couple of quick things to consider: 1) RAC is on the hot seat - if he doesn't win next season, he will almost assuredly be gone. B) Potential FA's know RAC is on the hot seat. 3) Most FA's will want to go to a stable situation with a chance of winning. D) The weather in Cleveland stinks 5) The only way quality FA will come to Cleveland is if Savage completely over pays (see also: 2002 Browns playoff team) 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
http://www.nflfans.com/x/2007/showplayer.php?key=Joe%20Thomas Pros: Great size and wing span with the rare athleticism displayed by franchise left tackles. With the outside speed pass rushers becoming so dominant in the NFL his elite pass protection is a must for any team lacking a franchise tackle. Team leader who can change the attitude of an entire offensive line...
Cons: Can be better as a run blocker and isn’t as mean and nasty as you would like an offensive linemen to be. Injuries are a concern but he finished his senior season out healthy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
Quote:
1) RAC is on the hot seat - if he doesn't win next season, he will almost assuredly be gone.
Not that this isn't a factor, but Savage makes the final decision on personnel. He might weigh this into his decision, but I wouldn't expect it to be a major factor. JMO
Quote:
3) Most FA's will want to go to a stable situation with a chance of winning.
I think money is the higher objective to most in FA - but all else being equal I agree. Depends on where they are in their career also.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Wanna take a guess on how many of these guys actually go top 5 when all is said and done No because teams who want something specific will scrutinize over them all..now just because anyone of them drops out of the top five doesn't mean it's due to a percieved weakness..needs/wants of teams are often factors also.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 |
Also other teams "leak" information on purpose to discredit players that they want. IMO
and IMO I think that the Titans or someone else around that pick were the ones airing out Vince Youngs wonderlic results perematurely.
JMO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832 |
Quote:
I think money is the higher objective to most in FA - but all else being equal I agree. Depends on where they are in their career also.
That was my final point - the only way quality FA come to Cleveland is if we are willing to overpay.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,341 |
I'm not saying anything other posters haven't said, but if Thomas is there, we HAVE to take him.
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960 |
Man Danglet, I can't even begin to tell you how many times I've heard him refered to as a possible LT and to tell you the truth, I have no idea where it's coming from.
When he was drafted, he was thought to be a Guard who could maybe play center as well...
Some have speculated that he's played a little LT, but I haven't actually seen that anywhere... (could be true, but I just haven't seen it)
Call me crazy, but he's been a pretty darn good Guard,,, I'd rather he stay right there.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 99
Practice Squad
|
Practice Squad
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 99 |
Why would any really good FA want to come here? 1) A terrible HC, with little or no chance to succeed. 2) One of the most unorganized teams in the NFL. 3) A tough division, with little or no positive outlook for this team in the near future. 4) Not one really good OC will even interview for the job, because of Rac's imcompetence. 5) a QB coach with NO previous experience at that position in the NFL, who may end up as the OC, it's a joke.  The Bengals will probably make it almost impossible to take away a main cog in their OL. They may franchise or designate him or just pay him more money.  This will be the situation for any really good OC or FA, unless they are WAY overpaid or on their way out of the league like Washington.  Lerner should pay three outsiderers to evaluate Rac, football people like Madden, Wolf and Walsh. If they say he is a can't miss HC keep him if not, get rid of him and put out the $$$$ to get one of the best. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 403 |
I'm willing to bet that 1. You're not related to RAC in any way 2. You don't work in the Browns PR department 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,201
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,201 |
Quote:
Quote:
I think money is the higher objective to most in FA - but all else being equal I agree. Depends on where they are in their career also.
That was my final point - the only way quality FA come to Cleveland is if we are willing to overpay.
1. It's Free Agency... it's a money driven market.... EVERYONE overpays for the premium talent. Even moreso when you get into a bidding war... it's no different than any other commodities market in existence, except that these commodities can actually choose where they go. With rare exception though, they go where the money is.
2. The salary cap is higher than ever before by a large margin and more teams than ever have the mega-money to resign their own guys..... so the guys that do move to another team are either unwanted scrubs or they are doing so because of Item 1.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
When he came out he was projected as a possible LT.
When Levi Jones went down it was the first option the Bengals went to. Didn't watch him some said terrible...but I can't go by that???
6'6" ...quick, fast and athletic. Has good technique.
Actually I thought the reason the Bengals would have no chance to sign him cause he would not pass up on the opportunity to get LT money in FA.
Sorry but if Shaffer could command his contract...can ya blame Steinbach - who I got a feeling will be a better LT than Shaffer.
Its also why I don't think we get a shot at signing him. Somebody might throw stupid LT money at him...although we aren't in that market this year so I don't know who will??? Miami?
JMHO
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
Attack to be fair there is one reason that I really really like Thomas. His ability to recognize and adapt to the blitz. He has pace and Ogden beat in that area. His technique is great but his recognition skills is phenominal. You dont see him stand there like Gallery and let a corner or safety just come free while he blocks noone.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089 |
Robert Gallery arm length- 32.5 inches
Joe Thomas arm length- 33.5 inches
Some other comparisons D-Brickashaw Ferguson- 35.5 inches Marcus McNeil- 35 3/8 inches Marco Colombo- 34 inches Winston Justice- 34 7/8 inches Flozell Adams- 33 inches
Now its difficult to find arm length measurements from older draft picks, so I can't compare against people like Pace or Ogden.
However, it does seem that Joe Thomas arms are shorter than average for a tackle.
Just info for y'all...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Interesting..I do know what I've seen of the guy and his blocking has been excellent..he knows how to ward off the DE and drive him away from the QB ..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 |
j/c sorry to get off topic but... 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089 |
I agree with you completely... everything I've seen of Thomas has been excellent.
Then again, everything we saw of Gallery was outstanding as well....
For every potential Pace, there's a potential Gallery....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456 |
I was looking for information on the arm length stuff and ran across this. Its old dated 2002 but it is an interesting read non-the less. Quote:
The hit parade at left tackle - NFL Insider - football draft; includes other notes Sporting News, The, March 11, 2002 by Dan Pompei Teams in search of a left tackle need not dispatch scouts to Saskatchewan, Barcelona and Grand Rapids. They need not set up a visit with every street free agent who fills up a doorway. They need not butter up agents of undrafted players with fruit baskets and sweet-whispered promises.
All anyone in need of a left tackle has to do is select one in the first round of the draft. As cows come from farms, left tackles come from first rounds. Last season, 20 of the league's 31 starting left tackles--64.5 percent--were first-round picks.
Left tackles aren't like quarterbacks, receivers, defensive backs or interior offensive linemen--all of which can be found in many of the same places as loose change. The elite skill of the left tackle is so clearly definable that left tackles rarely slip through the cracks. Only two of the starting left tackles in the league last year were undrafted coming out of college--Barry Sims of the Raiders and Derrick Deese of the 49ers.
There are fewer left tackle prospects than prospects at most other positions. Phil Savage, Baltimore's director of college scouting, says the Ravens start out with 25 prospects on their board who can play tackle, compared with 50 who can play on the interior. And less than half of those 25 have quick enough feet to play the left side, where players must be both strong enough to stop a power rusher and quick enough to head off a speed rusher coming around the corner on the quarterback's blind side.
"The level of excellence at guard and center is so low compared to left tackle," Savage says. "A sixth- or seventh-round guy can play on the interior, but probably not at left tackle."
The April draft will add to the list of first-round left tackles because as many as five tackles could be taken that early. Miami's Bryant McKinnie and Texas' Mike Williams are expected to be top 10 selections. Arizona State's Levi Jones vaulted into the first round with a solid showing at the Senior Bowl. Florida junior Mike Pearson might sneak into the round after a solid combine. Auburn's Kendall Simmons, who is considered a tackle by some teams, a guard by others, also could go in the first round.
If history is a guide, left tackles chosen in the first round won't be busts. Picking a tackle in the first round is like picking a hamburger from an intimidating menu--it's the safest thing to do.
In the past 10 drafts, 81 percent of the 43 tackles chosen in the first round have played like first-round picks--or in the case of some younger players, at least have shown the promise to play at a first-round level. That is a phenomenal "hit" rate compared with other positions. Only eight tackles drafted in the first round since 1992 have performed clearly below expectations--Arizona's Ernest Dye, Philadelphia's Bernard Williams, Miami's Billy Milner, Kansas City's Trezelle Jenkins, Green Bay's John Michels, Pittsburgh's Jamain Stephens, Washington's Andre Johnson and Oakland's Matt Stinchcomb.
If McKinnie and Williams are picked in the top 10 and don't succeed, they will be true aberrations. In the past 10 years, every tackle chosen in the top 10 has been a success. Eight of the 12 top-10 picks chosen as offensive tackles since 1992 have been to the Pro Bowl--and a handful, like Tony Boselli, Jonathan Ogden, Willie Roaf and Orlando Pace, could be Hall of Fame-bound.
The low bust factor can be attributed to the fact that it's easy to evaluate left tackles. Lions executive director of player personnel Bill Tobin, who has taken part in drafting seven first-round tackles (Dennis Lick, Ted Albrecht, Keith Van Horne, Jim Covert, Stan Thomas, Tarik Glenn and Jeff Backus), points out that tackles, unlike players at many positions, are gradable on every play.
As a result, there are fewer surprises. Scouts can see how quick their feet are and gauge their ability to recover when caught out of position. They can see if the players can bend their knees. It's evident if they play with power. Height and arm length are indisputable pieces of information.
After watching only a handful of plays, Savage says he realized Ogden could excel at everything required of a left tackle. Rams offensive line coach Jim Hanifan recalls the nearly effortless process of studying Pace before the Rams selected him with the first overall pick in 1997. "If you looked at more than one tape of his, the only reason was to make sure you weren't seeing double," Hanifan says.
Indeed, the Mushroom Club, the brotherhood of offensive line coaches, must be doing a good job of identifying players and selling their needs to team executives and head coaches.
"Most teams rather would not expend a first-round choice on an offensive lineman," Hanifan says. "They'd rather use it on a playmaker, a skill-position athlete or a pass rusher. But if you don't have a left tackle, you'll have to put the tight end over there or chip with the back to eliminate the right defensive end. That takes away from the offense and lets the defense dictate."
The importance of the left tackle can't be overstated. Savage says it is perceived almost as another skill position because what the left tackle does is almost as important as handling the ball. A great one like Ogden makes other players on the line better.
Another reason for choosing a left tackle early is those players tend to be cornerstones who endure. "There is no guarantee when you take one high he's going to be a player," Tobin says. "But if you get a good one, and you usually can, they come in, play early and play long."
And that's what a first-round pick is supposed to do.
CLICKY
Again its old but does speak to the fact that if a team picks a LT at the LT position in the T10 of a draft your chances of having a good one are excellent he will be better then good. Now its just a matter of if Thomas is actually a Top 5 pick which is Savages and the other GM's jobs to figure out. If he goes that high chances are hes going to be a good one and have success.
If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950 |
Tired of experince, He's a guard, lets keep him at guard....if we sign him...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
Fantastic article Nick, thanks.
That article not only supports the arguement that taking Thomas is the ONLY right thing to do, but it also hints that the signing of Shaffer wasn't just a move to solve the left tackle problem for now, but was designed to shift him over to another position the entire time.
So, if we go on the presumption that Shaffer was going to be moved, it stands to reason that taking a bonifide left tackle if he's there at 3 or 4 is the most likely plan.
Case closed
(.....and Steinbach is a guard) *L*
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 |
:::applauds Toad::: I couldn't have said it better myself! 
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Steinbach at LT
|
|