Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
M
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
M
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
Quote:

BTW, it's your OPINION that Anderson not being traded was a mistake. It's other's opinion that it's more important to find our QB than it is to pretend each player is a comodity on the stock martket.




I agree. After watching the QB ranks throughout the NFL get decimated with injuries last year, I was pretty comfortable keeping two guys we believe can at least be serviceable and at best be Pro Bowlers. What if he had traded DA for say, the legendary first and third, then we lose Brady to a season ending knee injury (like the other Brady). You could bet that the boards would be howling for Savages head. Hindsight is always 20/20.


Brown's fan since 2004...the tradition continues.
[Linked Image from i21.photobucket.com]
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Shaffer Trade in the Works?

April 29, 2007

UPDATE FROM TGI'S KEN PALMER: While the Browns did, indeed, contact the Giants regarding left tackle Kevin Shaffer, it's highly unlikely that a trade will be made. The Browns' asking price - of either a fourth-round pick during the recently-concluded draft or a third rounder next year - was too steep for the Giants' taste. As a result, New York didn't even make a counter-offer.

Cleveland, a club that has had little to no offensive line depth in recent seasons, isn't going to just give Shaffer away unless they get the right price. The Browns, of course, just drafted Joe Thomas to play left tackle with Shaffer, the previous LT, expected to compete with Ryan Tucker for the right tackle job.


ORIGINAL STORY


The Cleveland Browns and New York Giants have reportedly been in contact about a potential trade of LT Kevin Shaffer to the Giants, according to Ken Palmer of TheGiantsInsider at Scout.com. The Giants have confirmed that there have been discussions, according to Palmer.


While common thinking in the wake of the Browns decision to draft Wisconsin LT Joe Thomas has been that Shaffer would switch to right tackle, it's worth noting that the tackle hasn't spent time at the position in the NFL. It's often suggested that Shaffer was in a right tackle role with the Falcons because he didn't protect the left-handed Michael Vick's blind side, but Shaffer's ability to make the position switch is still an unknown.

Trading Shaffer would mean that there are still open questions about the Browns right tackle position, since Ryan Tucker's season-long available would still have to considered questionable. Reserve tackle Kelly Butler is generally not considered to be an NFL-caliber starting right tackle. At this point, there have been no reports recieved by the OBR regarding players or compensation the Browns might request in exchange.


Trading Shaffer would also cause over $7.5 million to accelerate to the Browns 2007 salary cap. Shaffer signed a seven-year contract with the Browns in 2006 with an estimated $9 million in bonuses. If those reports are accurate, six years of the pro-rated bonus would have to be absorbed this year.

The Browns have not been reached for comment at this hour.

___________________________________________________________

So the plan was to overpay for a RT, put him at LT for one year, then find his replacement, then try and trade him to the Giants for a 4th rounder and then if that doesn't work out. Guy is our RT!

Do you know how corny that sounds? And I promise to tone down the "smack" talk. But what happened and "plan from Day 1" is just FALSE.

Refute it if you can with a published story please.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Shaff was not in a vacuum ... we weren't his only suitors .. and he wanted LT type money ... so we had to pay it ... WE HAD NO ONE TO PLAY LT ... NO ONE ... so we OVERPAID FOR HIM .. imagine that ... someone being over paid in FA .. WOW .. theres a shocker .. *L* ...

Toad .. to bad U can't use the dumb ass defense like I can ... *L* ...




Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 104
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 104
Guess this turned into a Shaffer thread ???

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Quote:

If Savage has done such a great job, why are we about to have our 3rd losing season out of 4 years?




1. Never said Opie did even a good job much less a great job ...

2. How long did U think it would take to start winning .. did u think this was a one year thing and we'd be on our way??

3. the first year was spent TEARING DOWN and that affected the cap year 1 and year 2 ... so we really did NO RE-BUILDING in year 1 and year 2 was limited ... to bad your impatience does not allow u to understand that ...

Quote:

If its a coaching issue, why did he let Crennel stay this long...




1, who said it ws coaching??? .. I know it wasn't me ... *L* ..

2. Exactly when should he have been fired ... at the Bye week last or this past off season ... let me know when u think the right time should have been ...

U know what dude .. don't bother ... your to cagey for me .. I give up .. U win .. can um all ... and while were at it .. lets get rid of Lerner also as this is all really his fault ... hopefully the team moves again and in 7 years or so we can get a GOOD OWNER IN and all will be well ...




Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
looks that way ... its better than a can RAC or a DA/BQ sucks .. nor hes great thread ... *L* ...

No worries mate .. I;m bowing out of this ... hmmmm ... can't even think of the right word to call this nonsense ...




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Man you are going overboard..dude was the better option for the Browns and was paid to come here..it was never stated he was cemented at that spot.
They had to do it and see how he played ..they needed a LT desperately.
He was young and viable and at the time the best option in Phils mind.

When 06 ended Phil and the coaching staff knew they needed a upgrade and the only place to get it was the draft.
Really not sure your point...but it's done.

Last edited by Attack Dawg; 11/10/08 03:22 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

I know you can read. Show me where it was laid out on day 1 by the browns. You can't.



If I could, you'd have all the proof you need to show Savage is an idiot, since only an idiot would have come right out and said "Shaffer is a stopgap left tackle. We plan on bumping him over to the right when our old-ass, oft-injured right tackle breaks down." However, since Savage isn't an idiot.........
Quote:

And that 35M would have made him....if not the highest paid RT in NFL history...then it's awfully close.





That's where you weren't playing attention.

When it happened, I, along with others, pointed to his contractual numbers, which showed he wasn't really a left-tackle in terms of money, but a right tackle. So, since I'm feeling charitable today, I'll help you out:

Quote:

Kevin Shaffer 3/11/2006: Signed a seven-year, $36 million contract. The deal includes $12.5 in guarantees. 2008: $2.9 million, 2009: $2.65 million, 2010: $2.9 million, 2011-2012: $3.4 million, 2013: Free Agent





That $12.5 million in guarantees is paltry for an NFL left tackle. Let me 'splain further by using Steinbach's contract:

Quote:

3/2/2007: Signed a seven-year, $49.5 million contract. The deal includes $17 million guaranteed. 2008: $1.5 million, 2009: $3.6 million, 2010: $5.75 million, 2011: $6.25 million, 2012: $6 million, 2013: $6.25 million, 2014: Free Agent





Is it settin' in now?

I don't know exactly how those $12mil in guarantees were laid out, but let's just assume they are signing bonuses to be spread out over the course of the seven-year deal. That's not even $2 million per year BUT, let's OVER-estimate it, and say it IS $2 million per year.

In the last year of the deal, a year when these players make HUGE numbers, his cap number would be $5.4 million That's it. In fact, that number is essentially the same one it'll be throughout every year of his deal, as each year is virtually identical.

So you believe he became the highest paid right tackle in the league once that move happened. Ok. Let me lay out some solid right tackles and their numbers for this season:

Jon Jansen (who was relegated to backup status): $5.98 million (he was also paid a $5million roster bonus that ISN'T included in that number.

Willie Anderson with the Bengals in '06: $5 million +

Ryan Diem Colts: $5.5 million +

Tony Pashos Jags: $2.7 mil this year, $6.335 million in '09

Damien Woody Jets: around $6.7 million in '09

David Stewart Titans: Around $5 million (details are sketchy)

Marc Colombo Cowboys: $5 million '08

Mark Tauscher Packers: $6.271 cap hit '08

Jonas Jennings Niners: $5.85 million cap hit '08

Gettin' it now?

Some of these guys are nobodies, some are retreads. What's more, as Shaffer's contract gets into 2010 and beyond, he becomes an absolute bargain.

No left tackle gets a shorty-contract like that.

Any other questions? *L*


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,085
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,085
I think this is more about the scheme and play on the field, the lack of heart in a few (arguably) skilled positions. I am OK with savage; it was much worse before his arrival. And we have plugged and patched extensively, way too extensively. He can't be blamed for hype and excessive expectations. Many fans are still starved for real NFL caliber football as they have seen it played. We have not, without opening a can of worms as to the reason for that, and getting into blame-fixing for the lack thereof. But we are not using people for what we drfted them to do, and we are losing too often because of refusal to do what beats us. PRessuring QB's comes to mind as only one example. Some of this is individuals' abilities and talents. But we can be more ambitious and more aggressive in the game called on both sides of the ball. Good picks won't address weakness in that department IMO. For what it probably is worth.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

Dawgbone,
Guess this turned into a Shaffer thread ???





Since Shaffer's contract is being used as a reason Savage FAILED, it's well-worth the time to express why it WASN'T a failure, especially under erroneous pretences.

Attack,
Quote:

Man you are going overboard..dude was the better option for the Browns and was paid to come here..it was never stated he was cemented at that spot.
They had to do it and see how he played ..they needed a LT desperately.
He was young and viable and at the time the best option in Phils mind.





Furthermore, if the Giants were interested in over-paying for Shaffer, say a 1st round pick, we'd have been dumb NOT to take that deal.

Shaffer wanted to stay at left tackle: CHECK
We were going to move him: CHECK
Moving means he won't get LT money in the future: CHECK
He'd be an idiot if he didn't want to explore that possibility: CHECK
In the end, the Giants didn't want to overpay to get him: CHECK
He gets moved to right tackle where he was a better fit: CHECK

It all points towards Savage's intent with Shaffer.

Blaming Savage for Shaffer is a miss. HOWEVER, making the leap of faith that he was never supposed to be a right tackle, he's earning his money as a right tackle, which makes it a good move.

*dusts hands* I'm done here.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,678
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,678
Quote:

Needs this off season

1 RB
1WR
1 O-lineman
2 D-lineman
3 LB'ers
2 DB's

Thats 10 holes, and we will not be able to fill them all in one off season.




I don't think it is that dire.

I disagree about DB's other than you always need those.

I think the DL is good once R Smith is back.

RB.....yep...though we can probably stretch one more year without a real stud drafted....backs don't need a lot of time to make it...no matter what romeo thinks...rookie backs can make a impact day 1 if given a chance.

O-line...yep...there are a couple of good centers out there...maybe a guard...a RT prospect would be welcomed...and this is a pretty deep draft in quality O-linemen...may be some steals in round 2.

Backer....yep....need one of the big boys in the draft..and we will have to spend some money on a FA...a good one...forget Shantee Orr types.

With a trade of Anderson...we can get a 2nd or 3rd in my estimation..we might be able to get more done than you think.

Add in a coach who will do more to get more out of who we have...a turn around isn't out of the question.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,678
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,678
Quote:

I'm curious to see if any of my fellow Dawgs remember me explaining this the day he was signed. 'Peen and Eotab were central to some of those discussions.




I know man.....Schaffer was the best option available at the time and pretty much viewed as a quick fix at LT.

He was given a shot, but I don't think anybody was holding their breath he was going to be the answer at the position.

I give him more credit that some...he didn't suck at the position...but he isn't what we want or needed...as a LT he is probably fair and could start for 3-4 teams in such a role. As a RT...he is better and starts to push being able to start for maybe a little more than half the teams in the league.

I would like to see a upgrade at the position, but if it doesn't happen for a few years, it or he isn't going to kill us.

Just talking O-line...we need a center...Fraley is good for now, but his body is the type that will go down quickly when it starts to happen....guts and desire are his game...so we have to get a good player in here so he has a year or two to get ready for the demands of the position.

I also think we need a guard....Sowells isn't going to answer anything..we have to get better there..and maybe soon since Tuck is getting older and looking like he is starting to break down. He is just so big, that 80% of him is still pretty good...but that can't last much longer.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 104
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 104
Well,, Savage is failing. Didn't he say when he first got here, that we would build through the draft ?
I haven't seen it. only just a little. seems it's more through FA than the draft.
And we have a coach that can't coach. every post game comment is ,, "I think". he should know by now, instead of ,,, I think.
Just look at the "W" & "L" .. ratbirds rookie qb. falcons rookie qb. how long we kept bq on the bench? we played easy schd last year. We should've just got the Oz and turned it over to him. jmho
But hey,, who knows ? maybe we'll implode again and we can start all over, AGAIN.
When u hire people with no proven track record,, u get what u get.
I know I'm tired of waiting too, but I'll still keep waiting. Hell , I've been waiting since "64",, and I'll continue to wait.. What another 44 yrs... ???

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
Quote:

Just talking O-line...we need a center...Fraley is good for now, but his body is the type that will go down quickly when it starts to happen....guts and desire are his game...so we have to get a good player in here so he has a year or two to get ready for the demands of the position.






Always love to talk O-line.....I do believe we should always draft a O-linemen on day one of the draft, but as for Fraley, I'm for drafting or signing a FA center and moving Fraley to guard. Tucker I dont believe we can count on him anymore.

I would like us to aquire a couple more 2nd round picks for DA & Winslow and usign them to do this.

1. LB or Secondary Depends whos there when we draft, best A.Availble
2. Secondary or LB Same best A. at one of those two positions.
2. O-Linemen ( center / guard )
2. Best availble at LB CB or RB.

Keep in mind if we Trade DA we will be looking to address the back-up QB position and Dorsey isnt the answer, so we draft a QB in later rounds or sign a veteran QB. Remember this QB will not be our 3rd but 2nd. I do think Dorsey might be able to handle a game or two but if something happens where Quinn goes down for any length of time our season might be well like Dallas. There's many roads to take on this but something to think about.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,165
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,165
I get your whole point on Shafer but in fairness to the other poster- the only reason that Shafer isn't our starting LT is that we were in a position to sign JT.

If JT had never been signed it's likely that KS would be the starting LT. I don't recall any big names in FA to fill the void -not that I've been focused on LT with JT in the lineup.

Anyway, the point is that you could sign a B+ guy like Shafer to play LT long term or until someone better comes along. Losing your starting job to JT is hardly a knock on your ability. Probably 25+ LT's in the NFL could lose there job to him.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Quote:

RB.....yep...though we can probably stretch one more year without a real stud drafted....backs don't need a lot of time to make it...no matter what romeo thinks...rookie backs can make a impact day 1 if given a chance.




I'm all for waiting for us to draft LeSean McCoy from Pitt.


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Ok there....slooooooowwwww down.

The Browns OFFERED Shaffer to the Giants for a FOURTH rounder. The Giants DECLINED.

The Browns wanted him and his contract gone the very next year after they OVERPAID.


And I'll go back and look at those contracts....we shall see. And we both know that the G structure changed drastically with the Seattle - Minnesota Hutchenson situation. Before that there were no Gs making anywhere near that money.

Simply explain why we offered Shaffer to the Giants for a fourth rounder.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Free Agency mistakes:
Brian Russell (letting a leader go when we needed him...)
I agree with you here, but I also see why Phil let him go. We thought Pool was ready to step in and start there.

Derek Anderson (extension & not trading in off season)
Completely disagree. In this league having two starting caliber QB's is key. And DA played well last year; we needed to see if he could do it and be our franchise quarterback.

Trent Dilfer Dilfer was awful and there was a rift between him and the coaching staff. He needed to go.

Donte Stallworth He's better than what our other options are/were. No one could have predicted he'd be hurt this much.

Shaffer (having this guy start at LT for a year was a horrible choice) He was the best option available. We signed him with the full intention of later moving him to the right side. No one else available was as good as Shaffer.


Blown Draft Picks and I mean in terms of where we took them. Braylon isn't a blown pick, but worth a #3 overall? No way...A couple of these guys have some value but not what we spent for them...


Charlie Frye 3rd rounder. We needed a quarterback.

Braylon EdwardsWas a Pro-Bowler last year and has the Browns' record for most TD's in a single season. Was BPA.

Kamerion Wimbley Had 11 sacks as rookie. I actually agree that he isn't as good as he should be.

Babatunde Oshinowo 6th rounder.

Demario Minter 5th or 6th rounder.

Isaac Sowells 4th rounder who is active every week.

Antonio Perkins 4th rounder.

David McMillan 5th rounder.

Andrew Hoffman 6th rounder?

Jonathon Dunn 7th rounder.

Travis Wilson 3rd rounder, and yes, bad pick.

Now let's name some of Savage's good picks:

JT: I don't care that it was the #3 pick. It was a great pick and many wanted us to take AP or Quinn.

Quinn: Many wanted us to take him #3, but instead we got him at 22.

BE: You are wrong here. Braylon has many faults, such as a huge ego and extremely inconsistent hands, but he is still a very productive WR.

Vickers: Was picked in the 5th or 6th round and is one of the best Fullbacks in the NFL.

DQ: Is our best linebacker.

Alex Hall: A 7th round rookie who is already contributing.

Pool: Is starting to play pretty darn well.

McDonald: A 5th rounder I believe. He had a bad game last week, but he is still pretty dang good.

Eric Wright: A pretty darn good corner.

Jerome Harrison: A 5th rounder who gets very positive yardage and plays special teams.

Now here are the good trades and FA moves he's made:

DA: Despite how you feel about him, he was a great pick up.

Jamal: I don't think I need to explain.

Joe J.: A pretty good veteran WR who helps this team more than we will ever know.

Steinbach: A very good guard who is key to our offense.

Hank: The glue that holds our line together. He gets downfield and makes great line calls.

McKinney: Did a good job for us last year starting.

Hadnot: Has played pretty well.

Lenny Freidman: Great special teamer and pretty good backup.


Now to others' posts in here and other threads:

I don't get the talk of switching to a 4-3. I think we are 2-3 linebackers and one corner from having a good to great defense.

Aside from those positions I think we need what GM mentioned earlier.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
good post.. and you didn't even list Rogers or Williams in your trades/FA's.. section, nor did you include LeCharles Bentley who would have been a stud but is likely done for reasons completely out of Phils hands..

Phil hasn't been perfect, the problem is that we had so little when he got here, that every less than stellar pick, even a 5th rounder that didn't pan out, was magnified... If you could compare Phil to other GMs around the league and what they have brought to their team in the last few years, I bet Phil is better than the vast majority of them... what he needs this year is to hit a couple home runs.. we need a defensive impact player or two, one that doesn't rely on blitzes and stunts to get to the QB, one that can just beat his man... and we need a LB to stop the run.. we have other lesser needs, but I still view those as our 2 biggest.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
Heck, thats even better than what I thought.......

Fire Phil...... .....We need to sign him up into a longer term deal.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Quote:

Is it settin' in now?

So you believe he became the highest paid right tackle in the league once that move happened. Ok. Let me lay out some solid right tackles and their numbers for this season:

Jon Jansen (who was relegated to backup status): $5.98 million (he was also paid a $5million roster bonus that ISN'T included in that number.

Willie Anderson with the Bengals in '06: $5 million +

Ryan Diem Colts: $5.5 million +

Tony Pashos Jags: $2.7 mil this year, $6.335 million in '09

Damien Woody Jets: around $6.7 million in '09

David Stewart Titans: Around $5 million (details are sketchy)

Marc Colombo Cowboys: $5 million '08

Mark Tauscher Packers: $6.271 cap hit '08

Jonas Jennings Niners: $5.85 million cap hit '08

Gettin' it now?

Any other questions? *L*





If you're going to pull numbers out and try to impress the masses at least try to get them close to right. Some of the numbers....are so far off it's scary. You may be able to pull one over on the newbies but don't try that with me.

Ok .... you asked for this.

Kevin Shaffer - Signed a 6 year deal in 2006 for $36M - At the time was as much or more overall money than any RT in football. Two comparables at $36M but fewer years! I compared it to the ones you named....here you go sport!


Jon Jansen - Signed a 5 year deal in 2007 for $23M
Willie Anderson - Signed a 5 year deal in 2006 for $32M, 3 year deal in 2008 for $11M
Ryan Diem - Signed a 7 year deal in 2005 for $36M
Tony Pashos - Signed a 5 year deal in 2007 for $24M
Damien Woody - Signed a 5 year deal in 2008 for $25M
David Stewart - Signed a 6 year deal in 2008 for $38M
Marc Colombo - Signed a 2 year deal in 2007 for $7M
Mark Tauscher - Signed a 2 year deal in 2007 for $9M
Jonas Jennings - Signed a 7 year deal in 2005 for $36M

So he's now the second highest paid RT in the NFL, 2M less overall money than David Stewart.

And if you're wondering...which I know you are....

Willie Anderson 2006 Pro Bowler for the FIFTH time, made Pro Bowl again in 2007

How many of those teams would straight up trade their RT for ours??? How about ZERO *L*

You Gettin it now? Is it settin in.......???

Your, this season numbers, are off by millions in many cases.

Don't make things up again. It tarneshes your reputation and it makes me spend 20 minutes looking things up. I only did it because you called me out. Well....you get what you ask for.

Now promise me you will stop making things up. And you're nowhere near as dumb as Diam so you don't have that excuse!

Ok I'm done thank you for playing.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
I had them both there. I must have accidentally erased them.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
You're serious!!!

Here. Let me help you:

No.......wait.........this is much more fun if I don't

Dude, I can't BELIEVE you're going by the so-called total value of the contract as well as years.

I'm going to work. There's still time for you to delete that pile of bovine excrement you call facts..........


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
All "facts" aside, is the guy overpaid or not?


yebat' Putin
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
I can't believe you dont......when you said......what a great contract it was on the backend!!!! Then you do value it!!!!

When you look at those inflated $80M contracts that everyone knows the player will never see the end of.....those are inflated!!!

This is the opposite and further proves my point.

You're sounding foolish now. Take some time and think about it and get back to me.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Just for everyone's knowledge...because Overtoad has put his little foot down.

The actual 2008 payments to these players....which include signing and option bonuses....you can figure out the rest of the years on your own....

Jon Jansen Salary: $5,870,000
Willie Anderson Salary: $6,452,040
Ryan Diem Salary: $3,504,800
Tony Pashos Salary: $6,610,000
Damien Woody Salary: $2,253,960
David Stewart Salary: $440,520
Marc Colombo Salary: $5,006,240
Mark Tauscher Salary: $4,728,240
Jonas Jennings Salary: $3,650,000

and our boy...who can't hold the jock of most of the aformentioned players...

Kevin Shaffer Salary: $4,250,000

For those interested in salaries click here: http://msn.foxsports.com/search?sp_q=marc+colombo


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Quote:

For those interested in salaries click here: http://msn.foxsports.com/search?sp_q=marc+colombo




If I was going to research players salaries, signing bonuses etc.. why on earth would I go to a Fox search on Marc Columbo?

What I would do is go to the USA Today NFL Salary Database which shows a total of: (Kevin Shaffer for 2008)


Base Salary Sign Bonus Other Bonus Total Salary Cap Value
$ 2,900,000 $ 1,259,375 $ 450,000 $ 3,350,000 $ 5,016,041

http://content.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/salaries/playersbyposition.aspx?pos=135


SaintDawg™

Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
It has the 2008 salary information for every player. Just linked to Colombo's page...you can type a name and get the salary info.

Your site is very good. I'll use it from now on. Thanks!


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,363
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,363
Quote:

Were not as far away as people think ... getting even remotely close to healthy and an OLman a DLman and 2 LBers would go a long ass way in getting us where we need to be ...




If we were healthy I would agree, but you know as well as I do that in the NFL it is very rare that a team stays healthy. IF Stallworth were and JJ were healthy we would still need one WR IMO. Next year Lewis and Tucker will be a year older, and we don't know if JJ will be back. Willie is ready to hang em up, and Cousins (toast) won't be any better, nor will Davis. I could go on but like I said before we still have ten holes to fill next season. Not all of them need to be starters and studs, but they need to be upgrades to what we have now.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Hindsight is always 20/20 ......

but wouldn't a DL that had both Shaun Rogers and Ngata on it be a wonderfully dangerous thing of beauty?

I wanted Ngata when the pick rolled around ..... but we made the trade instead .... and "fleeced" the Ravens out of a pick that turned into nothing .... and drafted a player who hasn't been all that yet either.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 66
L
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
L
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 66
Quote:

Hindsight is always 20/20 ......

but wouldn't a DL that had both Shaun Rogers and Ngata on it be a wonderfully dangerous thing of beauty?

I wanted Ngata when the pick rolled around ..... but we made the trade instead .... and "fleeced" the Ravens out of a pick that turned into nothing .... and drafted a player who hasn't been all that yet either.




If we drafted Ngata I seriously doubt we would have traded for Rogers.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Quote:

Quote:

Hindsight is always 20/20 ......

but wouldn't a DL that had both Shaun Rogers and Ngata on it be a wonderfully dangerous thing of beauty?

I wanted Ngata when the pick rolled around ..... but we made the trade instead .... and "fleeced" the Ravens out of a pick that turned into nothing .... and drafted a player who hasn't been all that yet either.




If we drafted Ngata I seriously doubt we would have traded for Rogers.




I would have taken Ngata regardless.

The guy is flat out a player ..... and would be a tremendous NT or DE in our scheme.

I also suspect that f we'd had Ngata, we might have looked at Rogers .... but probably would have passed on Williams.

Of course .... Romeo wanted the "pass rusher" ... because they are so much "harder to find" ........

and as it turned out ..... even harder to keep productive and disruptive when they have only 1 move.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 214
K
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
K
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 214
Quote:

Looks like the general feeling around here is that Savage does a lot better with his sleeper/late round picks. His top picks overall have not been quite what we expected. Is there any way that he is doing well in the later rounds because Romeo is a lot more hands off with the later rounds? Is there a chance that a new head coach would actually improve Savages top round picks by offering better input towards the teams needs? I don't want to turn this into a blaime Romeo thread, but is there a chance that an improved coach could even help our drafts?




I don't think there's been anything wrong with his top round picks. Joe Thomas was an awesome pick. Braylon was really awesome in 2007 and despite the 2008 dropsies I think he'll recover and be an elite receiver for a while. Either way Braylon was a good pick. Wimbley had 11 sacks as a rookie and disappered. Jury is out on him still but I'd say it wasn't a good pick but it looked like it for a while and it's not too late for him to be another Calvin Pace late bloomer. Brodney Pool is a solid safety, not a bad pick...Eric Wright I think is gonna be really good and that was a good pick so far. Brady Quinn, another top round pick, I think will end up being a great pick too. There's been only like 1 or 2 2nd round busts. Our 1st and 2nd round picks have between solid and really good, our 3rd round picks I'd say are the only trouble we've had with Savage, but the midrounds are a crapshoot and I think it's only coincidence.

Savage is a fine GM, if you criticize his draft picks you need to take a look around at other teams drafts since 2005, very few would be considered better drafting teams since 2005 than the Browns.


[Linked Image from i232.photobucket.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

But when Shaffer was signed it was a long term move to shore up our LT position. He had never played RT!




When Shaffer was signed he had never played LT for a right-handed QB. He was essentially doing a RT's job only on the other side. Some of us thought he might soon be moved to LG, but very few expected him to stay at LT.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
M
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
M
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
Hey, let's not forget Savage signing the UNDRAFTED Josh Cribbs. Here's a player that probably 30 other teams would want. Now that says a lot about Savage's ability as a talent scout and evaluator, management shortcomings notwithstanding.


Brown's fan since 2004...the tradition continues.
[Linked Image from i21.photobucket.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
I agree with you keylime.. what Savage hasn't been able to do yet, and what he needs to do right now, is find us that impact defensive player.. like a Palamalu or a Mario Williams a Justin Tuck or even a LaMar Woodley.. (yea I hate to put 2 Steelers on the list but lets face it these guys are good).. a rookie that burst on the scene and has a great rookie year and improves from there. I think some of his defensive draft picks have been pretty good but we still need one or two of those types of players that demand attention and make all of the other "good" players we have that much better


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Quote:

Hindsight is always 20/20 ......





Yes it is and firing a guy like Phil Savage because he didn't have benefit of hindsight is about as crazy as can be.. but that's JMO


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
K
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
J/C here thought i would chime in

I am not going to blast Savage's draft, the only pick I disagree with Savage was the Wimbely Pick..I said it on draft day we should have taken Ngata because stopping the run is the key to winning in the AFC North.

Think about it..the Steelers and Ravens all play smashmouth football...Ngata was a big Run Stopper...it don't take a genuis to figure out who to pick. It was a mistake, but mistakes happen...I cna't blame him too much after all, Edwards, Quinn and others seem to have turned out OK...ya take the good with the bad

My main reason for this reply is simple...we need to scrap the 3-4...we just can't run it. There is only 4 Head Coaches in the league that are capable of effectivly running a 3-4 and they are:

1. Bill Cowher
2. Marty Schotenheimer
3. Bill Bellichik
4. Wade Philips

Assistants
5. Dick Lebeau(is an assistant and not a HC)
6. Dom Capers(look for him to come here if we get Cowher, he ran that great Steelers Defense of the early 90's with Lloyd and Greene, Lebeau was DB backs coach under Dom Capers)

We just simply don't have the coach to run it...I personally don't like the 3-4...its harder to find personel to run it correctly, and belive it or not the 3-4 is so complicated that you can actually "out smart yourself" when trying to run it.

We need to go back to the 4-3..the Tampa 2 Over and Under Defense is a "proven" good Defense and the advatage of running it are:

1. Its easier to find DL to run it.
2. LB are more built on Speed then Strength(See Derrick Brooks)
3. LB are easier to find for it.
4. Schemes are easier to run and the system is easier to learn

This in turn allows you defense to "attack" instead of react and thing

Belive it or not, butch Davis had our Defense in the right direction. PRIOR to the Ravens game we lost on Sunday night football(thansk to Scott Frost shanking a punt 7 yards from our own endzone) the Browns had the NFL's 2nd ranked Run Defese and 9th ranked passing Defense in the league....the following week, Injuries to Courtney Brown, Andra Davis and others decimated our D and led to DAvis's demise here

We had the right scheme, and "most" of the players to run it...we just scrapped it too soon

Im sick of Coaches coming in here and tearing everything down...we need a coach who will come in here and win with what we have....for example, Dan Reeves took over a 2-14 giants team and turned them around to a 12-4 or 11-5 team the following year with the same guys...we need a coach like that

I personally don't think Warren or Brown were bad players, Heck in the 2 seasons they spent in Denver they had 1 heck of a Run Defense with our former DL coach under butch Davis running things...The LB out in Denver said it was nice to beable to "run free" without being blocked all the time.

Many people blasted Warren for his lack of production, when most of the time except the last 9 games he played here, Warren was doing his job...Warrens job was just to tie people up..thats it..and it worked until the injuries that year killed us

We need to go back to the 4-3, its is a more "flexible" Defense IMo and easier to pick up and much easier to find the personel to run it.

Williams and Rogers make Great DT, we can put a 1st rd pick on a DE, and Wimbely can be regulated to a DE/sitional Pass rusher...we have the safeties and Corners to run the 4-3 allready

Dqwell Jackson would makea fine OLB We can draft a LB or even bring a guy over in FA to be our MLB....and I think we would be set...

It seems like teams that run the 4-3 win more games...look at the Giants, the Bucs, etc...those teams been good for years

I like the 4-3 because it is a "patient" Defense...it relies on your DL to be your primary pass rush...with a LB or safety sent sometimes with a mix of a corner every now and then...

the 3-4 has holes because you must "always" blitz atlast 2 guys to get pressure because you only have 3 DL men...the 4-3 gives more flexibilitity and the 4-3 is better against the deep ball....

the only way we should stick to the 3-4 is if we get Cowher or Marty, otherwise, scrap it

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 553
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 553
nolan ran a pretty good 3-4. i expect him to be in dalls next year tho. something about the suit...


A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.

John Barrymore
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
C
Poser
Offline
Poser
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Wow....just wow. We don't have the coach to run the 3-4? You do realize that the great Belechik you are touting as one of the only ones that can run it has stated that RAC was the one in charge of the defense and made the calls, right? Funny how Belechik disagrees with you.

Yeah, let's hire Marty back. After all, he has all those Super Bowl appea.....errr, ummm, well...

Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Thought about Savage...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5