DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Chud - What's Happened?

""I love the fact that [Lewis] wants to run the ball every play," said Chudzinski. "If we had a running back that didn't want to run the ball every play, I'd be a little bit concerned.
"By the same token, we have a bunch of other guys that want us throwing the ball every play."

Its when Chud makes statements like these that I wonder if he's really any good at what he does and does he have a feel for the game or is he just about X's n O's. When he says stuff like that or also that Up until the 3 rd quarter we had a 18 to 18 "RATIO" Run vs Pass as if that vindicates his play calling.

Does he watch the film...does he understand that its not done on paper...as in "What are you talking about I did my quota of running" - Is he totally unaware of the fact we owned the Texans in the running game. And also what is his excuse for not running play action off of the successful runs.

Him opening his mouth doesn't really do anything for me. I think he could be a "PAPER" genius but doesn't have a clue about the "GAME" the flow the feel and screw the RATIO!!! When you own a team in a certain area ESPECIALLY in the run game which would define control of the LOS - you have to exploit this. Is Chud blind to this fact and is he taking a "I'M A GENIUS" and I have to deal with these Morons who dare question me???

The Raven game thing was just a number and we were down and needed to catch up and our Run game was not producing. But this was a total different animal. This had a 30 carry day for Jamal written all over it and a 20+ offensive effort and mega Time of Possession advantage for the Defense to utilize.

The fact the Chud
a. Doesn't see it.
b. Thinks he was still correct.

just disturbs me. I think this guy thinks he's re-inventing the game of football.
I hope he gets better.

JMHO

By the same token he's had to call plays without ever once having the full slate of "weapons" in there at the same time at full strength. Here is where I am concerned.....we were beset by the injuries early and by seeing DA be "bad DA" more often than not. THAT is when it is time to re-adjust and go with what is working as opposed to continually trying what isn't working. We have, but a little too much a little too late........

I believe Chud must be about 3 or 4 people. No continuity to play calling. We do not seem to set up deep tries; we do not know more than 2 running plays; the side to side passing game is horrid and does not produce; we insist on no misdirection (maybe a reverse) in spite of being blitzed to oblivion. Either A) Chud is an inept OC or B) somebody who lacks offensive sense has and is poaching the calls and second-guessing or requiring what is going to the field, say RAC especially who has lost MY credibility or another offensive guy on sidelines. Maybe he is overriding Chud; hope so, because these are not his games. I think the Giants game was.
I am not sure of this, but no TDs in 12 or 13 quarters? RAC must be busy screwing around with stuff rather than calling out and fixing what he should. Whoever is calling this offense should REALLY WANT to give it back to Chud. Quinn mentioned he ran the plays he was given to run. IF their are multiple voices ttrumping him in his helmet, no wonder there has been stupid looking calls. Over 40 passes for Dorsey? Went with our power there! Can't even call that a gameplan. That would be football.

Terrible QB play in nearly every game
No go-to receiver since Joe is gone
Our second go-to has been injured half the season (Winslow)
Our rejuvenated RB looks old again
And our Pro Bowl WR forgot how to catch a ball

Even the most brilliant offensive mind would look inept in this offense.

I think RAC has no balls to make a decision that will hurt somebodies feelings as far as position play so everyone else is acting just like their HC. The tone of any team is set by the HC and ours has no nads.