|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960 |
Quote:
We don't need any more 1st time head coaches or coordinators. We need people who know what they are doing. Take the talent given to them and shape it
From a previous post you made, it's pretty clear you woudn't want Billick... and I agree 
Who does that leave that was a successful HC in the NFL that is available..
I see a several
Bill Cowher Marty Shottenheimer Dennis Green Steve Mariucci Brian Billick Jim Fassell
The list would be longer if you included guys that weren't successful before.. but then, why would you want them?
So out of that list (or any others you can add), which ones would you want?
I'd take Cowher, Shottenheimer or Fassel.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,391
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,391 |
it is a short list, isn't it?
I think when you look at that list and try to think who would be the best to finally bring this organization back to it's old school Browns football winning ways, the choice is obvious.
------------------------------ *In Baker we trust* -------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
You say we need a coach with experience as a head coach and then point to two teams (Miami and Atlanta) that turned it around quickly.....with first time head coaches. Hmmmmmm.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960 |
Quote:
I think when you look at that list and try to think who would be the best to finally bring this organization back to it's old school Browns football winning ways, the choice is obvious.
I really don't think it's all that obvious.. Cowher would be a natural fit,, but so would Marty and Fassel is a good coach.
Marty and Fassel would take what Phil gives him and make it the best it could be.. Cowher, it's said he wants total control. If we keep Savage, that's instant conflict. If Savage goes,, it might fit, but do you really want a HD/GM configuration? I sure don't.
So, no it's not all that obvious to me.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,086
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,086 |
For me the top 2 would be Cowher and Marty.
Cowher may take a lot of convincing. I'm sure Lerner will offer the dough, but not sure he'll want to.
Marty might entertain a comeback to C-Town, so I'd at least talk to him if I was Lerner.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563 |
Quote:
You say we need a coach with experience as a head coach and then point to two teams (Miami and Atlanta) that turned it around quickly.....with first time head coaches. Hmmmmmm.
Exactly, talent coaches will make it no matter what.
you had a good run Hank.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,391
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,391 |
Quote:
You say we need a coach with experience as a head coach and then point to two teams (Miami and Atlanta) that turned it around quickly.....with first time head coaches. Hmmmmmm.
I didn't say all first time head coaches are bad All good coaches must have had a start somewhere, right?
I just don't buy into the idea that we need to completely overhaul the roster again. Some quality coaching is what the team really needs. And we haven't had very good luck trying to find the diamond-in-the-rough first time coach. Gee whiz...let's try something different and go after someone with experience!!!!!
------------------------------ *In Baker we trust* -------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833 |
Quote:
Quote:
Whether you bring Cowher in here or not, we're an expansion team bro. - It's gonna take another 3 years at a minimum. - That's if we're lucky.
I'll see your BS and raise you a BS.
the expansion angle IS part of the problem.
How long did it take for expansion teams like the Falcons, Yuccaneers, etc. to start to win?
The Texans have been in the league longer and IMO we have done better.
In addition someone mentioned that one game the defense plays well, while the offense stinks and the next game is the exact opposite. Perplexing...
This year alot of injuries happened and IMO the most costly was Ryan Tucker.
Just a few more players and another 1/2 coaching staff away from good things.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum I pose the question again: Why do
we continually struggle?