Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
j/c

many of us were counting on the vikings as a potential trade partner given the system and potential fit for DA. doesn't look like that's happening now.

Quote:

Last year, the Minnesota Vikings nearly swung a deal for Texans backup quarterback Sage Rosenfels.

As rumors/reports had it, the Texans wanted a second-round pick, and the Vikes were willing to part only with a third-rounder.

This time around, the deal reportedly is close to happening, for a fourth-round selection.

The move would likely take the Vikings out of the running for a veteran quarterback in free agency, and it definitely would slam the door on speculation linking Matt Cassel to the men in purple.

Rosenfels is signed through 2009, at a base salary of $1.35 million.

Any deal could not be finalized until the start of the new league year, on Friday, February 27.






http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/02/23/rosenfels-to-vikes-coming-to-fruition/

and pft links to the houston chronicle for the story.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,313
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,313
I still think it may be the Jets...Little Shott. likes a more vertical game that would fit DA. better...

nordawg


The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,826
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,826
Quote:

Last year, the Minnesota Vikings nearly swung a deal for Texans backup quarterback Sage Rosenfels.

As rumors/reports had it, the Texans wanted a second-round pick, and the Vikes were willing to part only with a third-rounder.

This time around, the deal reportedly is close to happening, for a fourth-round selection.




I wonder how that negotiation went:

Minn: We'll give you a 3rd for Rosenfels.

Houston: No, we want a second.

Minn: Well let's just split the difference and we'll give you our 4th.

Houston: Deal!!!


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
I'm not surprised this surfaced again. I mentioned it as a possibility a while back. For some reason Chilli really likes this guy- and he comes cheap as well. And it saves face if TJack can figure things out. For a fourth rounder, Rosenfels is a bargain.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
As much as we need picks badly, I'm really hoping that we hang onto DA...we don't have a proven QB...and like DA, I don't think Quinn's going to pan out unless everything is clicking around him....at the moment I don't see that happening.

Trade down.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

For a fourth rounder, Rosenfels is a bargain.




While it is difficult to disagree with that assertion...I would not want Sage as the backup to the Browns.

The reason he went from being denied for a 3rd rounder to accepting a 4th for him? He completely melted down when he was thrust into the starting role last year.

The Colts game being the best example (he literally gave that game away by taking silly chances when all he had to do was fall on the ball to get a Texans win).

The Ravens game being another where he looked completely lost. The other Indy game he kept throwing covered 3 yard checkdown passes on 3rd and long. I didn't see the JAX game he started.

He had okay games against the Vikings and us...but, as I mentioned before the Cleveland game, it was only due to no pressure getting to him. If he feels even a hint of a rush, he panics.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,448
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,448
Byron Leftwhich ! ... Love this Kid...

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
If the Sage to Minni stuff is true ... and thats a BIG IF ..... were in trouble as far as trading DA goes ... we'd now be looking at a 3rd rounder as the best we could do ....

I believe he ends up here cause he has more value to us as a back up then what we could trade him for .... the posters on here think hes got alot more value than he actually has .... and that will be played out as the off season moves on ...

I firmly believe that Opie would have traded him last year if he could have gotten a 1st for him ... just 1 first .... so IMO if we could not get that after 07 .... what the hells he worth after 08 ...

Oh well ... on the bright side, were gonna have one hell of a back up ....




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
"If the Sage to Minni stuff is true ... and thats a BIG IF ..... were in trouble as far as trading DA goes"

Well I'll give my Half filled glass version.

Actually it sets a good tone. Although it knocks out a possible suitor for DA - quite frankly I didn't think Childress would ever go for DA in his system so that was a pipe dream by the Bozo media.

Rosenfels is an eight year veteran with 10 starts 30 tds in those 8 seasons (5 each the last 2 seasons) has an arm weaker than Holcomb and is a BACK-UP by trade and brings a 4th rounder. Then what does that make a 25 year old who has had 27 starts 29 tds in One season not 8 and a visit to the Pro Bowl as a 24 year old. I don't care what assessment we have of DA as our possible FRANCHISE QB...he still is WAAAAYYY more attractive to teams than Rosenfels - who set the bar as a 4th round value??? I think GLASS HALF FILLED

after all its what I do


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Bingo. If someone is giving up a 4th for Sage Rosenfels then we should get at least a 4th.

That's if we trade Anderson.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
"If someone is giving up a 4th for Sage Rosenfels then we should get at least a 4th."


Doh!!! 4th...heck the glass half empty pundant had us getting a 3rd rounder lol

I'm hoping for a 2nd - rumor has it Tampa has a 3rd on the table already.

JMHSpeculation


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Quote:

...rumor has it Tampa has a 3rd on the table already.




Done. Where do I sign?


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 102
2
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
2
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 102
I'd rather keep Anderson. And I really hope that the Browns do keep him. We have no back-up at the moment. If BQ goes down, then so does our season.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
actually tabber half empty man has him staying here and us not trading him .. and I'd be willing to bet the most we get for him now is a 3rd and 5th ... wanna make a small wager .....

Da was actually a good fit for the O that Childress is running now .. they actually run a vertical game and not any type of WCO ... I watched alof of them this year ... and Childress has adopted his O to his personel ... there a downfield passing attack .. contrary to popular belief ....

and bro .. theres not that many suitors for DA ... there really isn't ... so losing not only a suitor .. but the BEST SUITOR when U take everything into consideration ... is a HUGE LOSS for us ..

who knows how much truth there is to this story ... the only reason I see this as a possibility is because Childress is a MORON as a coach ... Sage is only an upgrade to Jackson cause Jackson stinks so much ...

and part of the reason Minni is a good suitor for us is because Childress is such a moron ... *L* ...

sorry bro .... is it half empty man vs half full man ... or is it .... reality man vs wishful thinking man in this case .... I think U know what my opinion is ...




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
I'm hoping for a 2nd - rumor has it Tampa has a 3rd on the table already
That is the rumor..and I would certainly look at it..see if they can add another low pick with it.

We lack picks..we need picks..

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 509
U
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
U
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 509
I'd ask for a 2nd, but take a 3rd and a 5th. But that's just me, and there's a reason the only trades I make are on Madden. Lol.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
I would take a 3rd and 5th also..then Iook for what I could get for KW..

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 509
U
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
U
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 509
I'm still torn on whether I want to trade Winslow or not. I go back and forth, but I am not opposed to trading him if a good offer comes along. I just wish I was more confident in Rucker being able to contribute, it would make me a lot more comfortable with Heiden and Rucker.

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
well not to mention that heiden is coming off a torn ACL. i don't see how we can afford to trade winslow now.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
I think Rucker can be a solid TE if they give the guy reps.
KW is going to deteriorate more and more every season..the fact he can't practice hurts because on game day as he's always lining up wrong and getting stupid penalties..one day that knee is going to give out..

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 509
U
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
U
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 509
What do you think the Browns could get for Winslow?

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 509
U
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
U
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 509
Quote:

Terry Pluto blog: Talkin' to myself about the Cleveland Browns quarterbacks ...

Question: Did you hear what Eric Mangini said the other day about possibly keeping both Derek Anderson and Brady Quinn?
Answer: He said he may keep them both. He said that he and his coaching staff have not decided on a starter. He said you can never have enough good quarterbacks, and he said he could even have a quarterback competition in training camp.

Q: Why did he say all that?

A: Because it is possible it could happen, but don't bet on it. Nor would it be a good idea. But if you're General Manager George Kokinis and if you are even considering the trade of Anderson, the last thing you want is your coach declaring Quinn the starter right now.

Q: Why?

A: Because you want to make Anderson sound like Otto Graham. You want other teams to believe with just the right coaching and the proper play-calling, this guy can be a franchise quarterback. You want to talk about the Derek Anderson who threw 29 touchdown passes in 2007 and made the Pro Bowl, not the Anderson who was waived by Baltimore early in his career, or the Anderson who struggled last season.

Q: Are you blaming Anderson for the 4-12 record and ...

A: It's not about blaming. It's about the Browns figuring out which quarterback will be best for them in 2009, and then using the other to bring the most in trade. Odds are they prefer Quinn. New offensive coordinator Brian Daboll was a wide receiver coach in New England when Charlie Weis called the plays. Weis had Quinn at Notre Dame and insists Quinn can be star in the NFL. It seems Daboll and his offense would lean toward Quinn, given the New England offense and the influence of Weis.

Q: So why not say that?

A: Because they want other teams to believe they really like Anderson, that they might indeed keep him. It's a way of telling the NFL that the Browns won't give him away.

Q: Anderson makes all that money, who will take him?

A: He will be a bargain for another team. Anderson is due a $5 million roster bonus on March 13, and his salary for 2009 is $1.5 million. The Browns should pay the bonus, then trade Anderson because he will cost the new team only the $1.5 million in salary and on the cap. That increases his trade value.

Q: Don't the Browns take a huge salary cap hit?

A: It happens either way. If they keep Anderson, he counts $8.8 million on the cap. If they trade him, it's $8.2 million on the cap. Going through another season with these two young quarterbacks seems to be another way of having no starting quarterback -- and the Browns need draft picks and talent.

Q: It's still hard to see why any team would give up much for Anderson?

A: That's because most fans just watch the Browns. They don't understand the desperation of some teams desperate for a quarterback. Minnesota just traded a fourth-rounder to Houston for career backup Sage Rosenfels. Before the 2007 draft, Atlanta received two potentially high second-round picks from Houston for another backup, Matt Schaub.

Q: What can the Browns get for Anderson?

A: At least a couple of second-rounders, maybe a low first or a chance to flop other picks. A veteran could be involved in a deal. Detroit and Tampa Bay would love to have Anderson. The Jets, Chiefs and 49ers also could be in the market. The Browns are taking their time, playing it smart to build interest in Anderson, so don't pay much attention to what they say publicly about their quarterbacks.




Link

I'm not nearly as optimistic about DA's value as Pluto, but I would love to be wrong!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Thinking back to when all that mess happened during the bye week I think..Philly was discussing him..I forgot what the offer was..a fifth I think..
Thats what you'll get for him..GM's will look at that knee and know he's got a short time left..
Philly might again be a team to start with since McNabby wants some recievers..

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,826
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,826
I would think we could get a 3rd this year and a conditional pick next based on number of starts.


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
If Pluto is right, Anderson would be worth more than I thought... I really didn't think we'd get much, but he makes a compelling argument for getting more.

Hope he's right.

Another thing I didn't know... Keep Anderson, the cap hit is only 600k more than trading Anderson....

Is the only way to get relief from the cap hit to cut him? is that what that means?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
"Done. Where do I sign?"

At the Rumored Negotiation Table


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
"not the Anderson who was waived by Baltimore early in his career"

This was the only thing that made me cringe...He was a 6th round pick and they Waived him among hundreds of others so that he would clear and be put on their Practice Squad...We stole him instead It wasn't like the Ravens were giving up on him...might as well add the rumor that we signed him to what we did cause it was rumored the Cowboys were going to make an offer and then trade him to the Ravens! The same team that Waived him.

Just a bit miss leading as a negative. Of course Diam will call it Reality...lol

JMHPicky une - it just irked me a bit thats all.


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Quote:

Just a bit miss leading as a negative. Of course Diam will call it Reality...lol




*L* .... touche bro ... I am actually right with U on that one ... I cringed when I read that to .. its mis leading ... therefore it is REALISTIC but only tells half the story making it an UNTRUTH in my world ... and the sad part is that Pluto knows this ... yet he INTENTIONALY MIS LEADS people by only telling half the story ...

this entire story is half baked bro .. U can tell its the dead time ... the Browns can say what they want ... NO ONE IS FOOLED ... everyone not named Da Man Is Hot knows who are starter is ...

the Browns trying to say differently is about as believable as OJ telling us he didn't kill Ron and Nicole ... U can spin it al u want .. but EVERYONE KNOWS ...

hopefully your wishful thinking wins out over my reality as I would LOVE to get a 2nd rounder for DA ... that would be some sweet tasting crow to chow down ...




Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
If not given a 2nd round pick, I think Anderson is worth a 3rd and 4th round pick.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 786
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 786
We would be LUCKY to get a 3rd rounder......and then we would would rip off their arm shaking his hand making the deal.


You dont have to win every game just the next one!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Quote:

Byron Leftwhich ! ... Love this Kid...




If Leftwich comes here, I want him starting day one.


#gmstrong
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
Quote:

We’re hearing that the new power structure in Cleveland — the combination of coach Eric Mangini and G.M. George Kokinis to which folks around the league refer as “ManKok” — isn’t sold on Brady Quinn as the starting quarterback.

One source with knowledge of the dynamics in Cleveland says that the new power structure there is “lukewarm” on Quinn.

As a result, don’t be surprised if the Browns opt to keep Derek Anderson, pay his $5 million roster bonus, and let Anderson and Quinn battle it out for the starting job.

Indeed, the two men never have competed openly for the position. In 2007, Quinn signed his rookie deal too late to make a meaningful run at being in position to replace Charlie Frye when he received the hook in Week One. In 2008, Anderson was the unquestioned starter throughout the offseason, training camp, and the preseason.

So maybe from the fires of competition a better starter will emerge. And maybe the guy who doesn’t get the job will be better off, too.

Here’s the key — neither Mangini nor Kokinis need to justify the decision to draft Quinn or to sign Anderson. The new coach and G.M. can focus on what’s best for the team, regardless of whether the answer is Quinn or Anderson, or neither.




http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/02/24/new-browns-regime-lukewarm-on-quinn/

it's very simple. new regime means no justification for previous picks but this could be a ploy to drive up DA's value. who knows.

Last edited by dong; 02/25/09 12:54 AM.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 553
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 553
Quote:

“ManKok”




sounds like something jim rome would come up with.


A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.

John Barrymore
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
ManKok...if it wasn´t my Browns I would be

Good to know we´re at least good enough for a joke around the league

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
Anybody care to speculate on exactly how that is pronounced?

After reading the Rogers story, I really needed the laugh.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
It wasn't like the Ravens were giving up on him...might as well add the rumor that we signed him to what we did cause it was rumored the Cowboys were going to make an offer and then trade him to the Ravens! The same team that Waived him.



The other part of that rumor was that the Cowboys would then have taken the Rats picks in that deal and try to move up in the draft to get McFadden..

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
The new coach and G.M. can focus on what’s best for the team, regardless of whether the answer is Quinn or Anderson, or neither.

There is truth to this statement. Mangini and Kok can do what they want with the QB- they did not draft Quinn or sign Anderson.
Any chance its a QB at #5?? Wouldn't that be crazy.

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
wouldn't surprise me. another blurb:

Quote:

Things are extremely quiet on the Derek Anderson front and we're being told that the Cleveland Browns weren't even actively shopping him at the NFL combine last week. The Browns would be open to trade possibilities if the right deal came along. But as of right now, teams in need of quarterbacks are not interested until the Browns pay the guaranteed $5 million bonus due March 13. Once that bonus is paid, the phones should ring more often and it will be up to the Browns whether to keep or trade Anderson after already paying that huge bounty.




http://myespn.go.com/blogs/afcnorth

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
^ Yup, no team in their right mind would bother talking to the Browns until the 14th of March. And I think that's fine. I'd be glad to pay that $5 million and then trade him. Once that's paid, his trade value shoots way up.

I wouldn't accept anything lower than a 4th for him*.


The GM in me wants to say "3rd rounder" but a high 4th would be ok. I think his presence will only be a distraction to the Quinn-era. The team needs to move on.


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

The GM in me wants to say "3rd rounder" but a high 4th would be ok.




Sage Rosenfels just went for a 4th rounder. DA is a better player, younger and will be cheaper (after the bonus is paid).

It's tough to see being so close to the situation, but he certainly should be worth 'at least' a 3rd rounder and probably a bit more (either 3rd&5th or 2nd...or a 3rd this year and conditional for next year).


#gmstrong
Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns analysis: As draft approaches, Anderson's value may rise for suitors

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5