Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#368348 03/23/09 01:47 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,558
dawg66 Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,558
Just curious why the Edwards trade discussion threads were deleted?


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
dawg66 #368349 03/23/09 01:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
I'm guessing because it was already talked about here.


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,558
dawg66 Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,558
OK, somebody should change the title then cause i never would have thought to look there for it, although i never posted the trade anyways.


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
dawg66 #368351 03/23/09 03:02 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,526
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,526
They are being deleted because the information coming out is based completely on rumor.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,558
dawg66 Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,558
Quote:

They are being deleted because the information coming out is based completely on rumor.




Help me out here, aren't these stories coming from a reporter and if so how are they rumors? and if that is considered a rumor how come the Stallworth to be charged stories aren't considered rumors especially since the Police say the results haven't been released.


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
dawg66 #368353 03/23/09 05:06 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Good point.. overall I think the refs do a bang up job of keeping crap rumors off the board... but what really is the difference between rumor, which gets deleted or John Clayton's speculation, which does not? Is it purely based on the source?


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,558
dawg66 Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,558
I think the refs do a good job on here too, but i'm just confused over why they thought that the Browns/Giants talks about Edwards were a rumor when it was being reported by a NY reporter that these talks had actually taken place.


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
dawg66 #368355 03/23/09 05:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Apparently, I'm the last person on the planet that should answer this question... at least today anyway...

One thing does kinda, in a very small way, annoys me however. I've not been reprimanded by a ref in well over a year for anything... and today, Ref 3 (I think) chose to do so publically and to me, a little embarrassingly.

My first error was posting an article from the Plain Dealer about Edwards and the Giants. I got a PM that it was moved. No problem..

Then I post something I guess was posted before on a thread that was/is 7 pages long...

And this is why I was borishly reprimanded for it..

Again, it's a little annoying to say the least.

Overall, the refs to a fantastic job,,,, but this one was a little odd to me.

No need to respond to me on it.. I'm good either way


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Fan Feedback Forum Edwards threads

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5