|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
Dawg Talker
|
OP
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044 |
Quote:
Quote:
haha but think of the debates if we had russell, he sat for a year, and DA had the year he did in 2007.
Dude, I fully doubt that you could have a conversation on the feasibility of windshield wipers on a goat's ass without bringing up DA into the conversation.
it was a joke. you got a problem, you know how to reach me.
don't take your frustrations on your boy getting his ass handed to him out on me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
"don't take your frustrations on your boy getting his ass handed to him out on me."
haven't made a comment on the last two QB DEADBATE threads cause its useless.
"ON YOUR BOY" so much for the objective opinion posters try to present themselves with.
Got news for you - DA, BQ whoever is playing is "OUR BOY"
And quite frankly I have seen two losses...none of which have been primarily on the head of BQ's play. Those who wish to see disaster will. I know my football and its not of the catastrophic level that some here present.
BQ hasn't been able to Pick up the team by the Scruff and lead them to victory. This part of the game has been disappointing - this was that "IT" factor he was to possess. And I got to laugh at anyone supporting DA...as in he has established himself as MR. ANTI-IT over the last 3 seasons. The key word being established.
All BQ has shown me this season...is when he sucks...he don't suck NO WHERE near as bad as DA.
But there is a lot of football left. There is a lot of gel on the offense to be made, we are not even at the tip of the iceberg. Disappointing? heck yeah. But it ain't the QB. It ain't the OC and his play calling. Its the execution - overall execution, that has the Offense miss firing on enough pistons to make it look Unstable.
And I love the General Assumption of a QB sucking as bad as some here say..."getting his ass handed out to him" With just pointing to the score as proof.
How bout breaking down his game - The way Diam does it and put your OPINION if you want to it - but to show us how correct you are in your ASSumption of analysis of something as complex as QB play. Show me the bad footwork...btw 90% of you all don't have a clue what "HAPPY FEET" is... 
You know once upon a time...You actually had to present "PURE FOOTBALL" into your arguments. Now if I do...I will be told that I'm condescending and all that crap. Yeah lets all talk out of our Butt holes. That's the ticket 
So many experts...lol 
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024 |
Quote:
All BQ has shown me this season...is when he sucks...he don't suck NO WHERE near as bad as DA.
I believe it's statements like these where the term "splittng hairs" was born.
LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
yeah...I know - I make one post regarding the deadbate on 15 pages of posting.
you're right...I shouldn't bother posting.
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024 |
That's a pretty broad jump you took there.
LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
I'm still married - I don't jump any broads... 
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,395
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,395 |
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
Dawg Talker
|
OP
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044 |
well we disagree but don't worry, you're not as condescending/rough as you used to be.
what i wrote was late at night at a petty one-liner. not a biggie.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
Quote:
My bad, then toad... I misunderstood your stance on Quinn.
*sniffle* It's so hard being the lil' ol' me......poor, poor misunderstood Toad.
No worries, Purp. As critical as I am, it's easy to think I'm throwing Quinn under the bus. While I believe Anderson has more tools in terms of passing, Quinn adds more dimensions to our offense.
My one biggest complaint is his inability to get the ball downfield. If he can figure that out, he can be a solid QB.
Quote:
Now, to go back to RealityLand: only a sick mind would have looked at Russell and thought he was an NFL QB.
Savage liked him *shudder* which probably explains part of the reason we're in this mess.
Having said what I said about Quinn and Russell, know that I'm in complete agreement with you. I look at Russell and see a physical presence that has never played the QB position in the history of the NFL, but that doesn't make him a good prospect. As much as I've questioned Quinn's accuracy, Russell has no earthly clue where the ball is going when it comes out of his hand.
Al Davis screwed the pooch on that one, and along that same process, I'm damn glad Savage is gone.
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,859
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,859 |
Quote:
Scary that Savage only selected Thomas as a compromise for a split war-room.
Can you elaborate on this. I seem to have missed this or forgotten about it. With whom was the war-room split? Russell was already drafted so not an option (though I am sure he was our #1 preference). We told BQ before the draft we were not going to take him at #4.
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
Yeah, elaborate on that woodja.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704 |
If I'm not mistaken, it was between Thomas and AP.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449 |
Quote:
With whom was the war-room split?
Thomas and Adrian Peterson.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
Quote:
Quote:
With whom was the war-room split?
Thomas and Adrian Peterson.
AND Russell...........
Remember there was an article several weeks back from a former personnel guy in the Browns that said Savage actually preferred Russell, but because there was a split on which guy the Browns should take, Savage selected the safest player of the bunch, which was Thomas.
It was said that some preferred Peterson, but that Savage wanted Russell. The compromise was Thomas.
I believe it to be factual, as Savage showed a ton of interest, and really liked, Russell.
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449 |
Overtaod,
Yeah, now that you mention it, your right. I do remember that article, but forgot the Russell part. I also remember Russell and Savage having a history back to pre-college days for Jamarcus.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,089
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,089 |
Peterson has proven to be a winner,, but then again, so has Thomas..
I think in the end, Thomas will play longer at a higher level. Just a guess...
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,859
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,859 |
Russell was PS's fav but he was drafted before our pick so was never an option.
Looks like he couldn't have gone wrong choosing between Thomas and Peterson. I wouldn't call either a compromise.
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,547
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,547 |
Quote:
Got news for you - DA, BQ whoever is playing is "OUR BOY"
Quote:
And I got to laugh at anyone supporting DA...
Quote:
All BQ has shown me this season...is when he sucks...he don't suck NO WHERE near as bad as DA.
There's some irony in there ........
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964 |
"All BQ has shown me this season...is when he sucks...he don't suck NO WHERE near as bad as DA."
And when he lights it up, like DA has done multiple times he... Oh wait, he hasn't.
That to me is the difference between the two. BQ's "superiority" over DA has so far been purely imaginary, at least on the field.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195 |
I just hope whomever the freakin' QB is during our games gets the job done and we move the football. I don't care at all who's calling the plays if we move forward. If they can't move the offense forward, replace them with someone who can.
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151 |
eo...Quinn is not as bad as DA when he's bad?
When DA is bad...we've still been in games. Only 2 games that hes ever started have we lost by more than one possession. So...bad DA isnt horrible.
in 2 games this season...Quinn (being bad) hasnt been closer than 14. Bad Quinn means we dont score points (and turn the ball over, 4 so far), and when DA is bad...we just turn the ball over. No where near as bad? seriously?
"It has to start somewhere It has to start somehow What better place than here? What better time than now?"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728 |
Quote:
When DA is bad...we've still been in games. Only 2 games that hes ever started have we lost by more than one possession. So...bad DA isnt horrible.
You might want to go and recheck your math. You're off by a lot.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,210
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,210 |
Yeah, but who wants accuracy to get in the way of a little spin??? 
LIbertatem Defendimus!!
2010 Dawgtalkers NCAA Bracket Challenge Champ!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189
Practice Squad
|
Practice Squad
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189 |
Quote:
"All BQ has shown me this season...is
He is being coached by Carl Smith (I think he is getting TimCouchitis) 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,482
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,482 |
I've stayed out of these debates forever but enough is enough.
DA : 31 games , 27 starts Quinn : 6 games , 5 starts
Record in games started: Advantage DA DA = 13-14 .481 Quinn = 1-4 .200
Completion pct : Advantage DA DA = 506-927 54.6% Quinn = 87-163 53.4%
Yards per attempt : Advantage DA DA = 6.68 Quinn = 5.70
Yards per game : Advantage DA DA = 199.8 Quinn = 154.8
Touchdown pct : Advantage DA DA = 4.64% Quinn = 1.84%
Interception pct : Advantage Quinn DA = 3.78% Quinn = 2.45%
Sack Rate(sacks per pass attempt) : Advantage DA DA = 3.88% (36 sacks in 927 attempts) Quinn = 6.13% (10 sacks in 163 attempts)
Career QB Rating : Advantage DA DA = 75.1 Quinn = 66.2
All that being said, is it time to bench Quinn RIGHT NOW? No. Has Quinn had enough games to PROVE himself better/worse than DA? No. Has Quinn played bad enough for us to be VERY worried? Abso-frickin-lutely. Has DA statistically outplayed Quinn in virtually every possible category? Yes sir.
To this point (again not ENOUGH time...but still to this point) the stats match the eyeball test when comparing these two QBs. Derek completes more passes, throws for more yards, throws for more TDs(scores more pts) and wins more games...but you have to live with him throwing more INTs. Unless Quinn makes huge strides in the next few games (I'll give him until the bye week) he looks like the inferior QB in just about every way shape and form.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/GraffZ06/browns_factory_sig.jpg) Fear us, for we are the BROWNS, led by the mighty BM! Only in Cleveland.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936 |
If you're going to play the stats game, you can't begin to compare them until you have an equal sample size. You don't have to be a statistician to know that.  "Waiting" until our bye week won't get you there, so your analysis will STILL be completely invalid (statistically speaking -- which is how you are attempting to build your case). If you're really interested in comparing stats, come back after BQ has 25+ starts under his belt. Only then will your comparison be worth reading.
[color:"white"]"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."
-- Mark Twain [/color]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802 |
Okay, stat time.... Tell me who "Unnamed QB Savior" was and who he played for when the Browns last beat the Steelers... Quinn can't even truly and decisively WIN this battle Unnamed QB Savior Career 62 75.1 1025 1714 59.8 11131 179.5 6.5 64 67 124 556 9.0 4.5 2 166 1119 35 14 Brady Quin Career numbers... Career 6 66.2 87 163 53.4 929 154.8 5.7 3 4 10 46 7.7 4.6 0 10 50 2 2 Pick One Option A.) Unnamed QB Savior Or Option B.) Brady Quinn Just if you were going by the numbers tell me who you pick. Then  your fatt butt off... Promising, huh?  Wherever you are TC... Wherever you are... (Jacksonville  )
Politicians are puppets, y'all. Let's get Geppetto!
Formerly 4yikes2yoshi0
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,089
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,089 |
Quote:
Russell was PS's fav but he was drafted before our pick so was never an option.
Technically, that's correct. But there were many stories (true or untrue we will never know) that savage was working the phones with the hope of pulling off a deal that would have netted them the first pick in the draft.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767 |
Quote:
Quote:
Russell was PS's fav but he was drafted before our pick so was never an option.
Technically, that's correct. But there were many stories (true or untrue we will never know) that savage was working the phones with the hope of pulling off a deal that would have netted them the first pick in the draft.
I suppose one would have to wonder what, if any, difference we'd see today.
Most likely DA would be the starter is all... without much controversy.
PS: DA would be getting blindsided from the left side. Thought that should be added.
Last edited by 1oldMutt; 09/27/09 09:24 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
and there's a good chance 2007 would not have been the 2007 we know today.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,547
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,547 |
Quote:
If you're going to play the stats game, you can't begin to compare them until you have an equal sample size. You don't have to be a statistician to know that. "Waiting" until our bye week won't get you there, so your analysis will STILL be completely invalid (statistically speaking -- which is how you are attempting to build your case).
If you're really interested in comparing stats, come back after BQ has 25+ starts under his belt. Only then will your comparison be worth reading.
What you can look at, however, it the almost exact same path that each guy has taken to the starting tole.
Quinn and Anderson each sat during their rookie year. They sat the 1st half of their 2nd year and then were pressed into service. (Quinn by being named starter, and Anderson due to an injury to Ftye)
Each QB's 2nd season looked like this:
Anderson entered the game in week 12 when Frye was injured. He played that game, as well as starting the next 3 before being unable to go due to injury.
Anderson completed 66-117 for 793 yards, 5 TDs and 8 INTs. (4 against Tampa Bay in his final game of the year)
Quinn ascended to the starting job in week 9 of his 2nd season.
Quinn completed 45-89 passes for 2 TDs and 2 INTs. He started 3 games, but was unable to finish the 3rd due to injury.
Eerily similar circumstances to this point.
The following season for each involved a QB competition. Quinn "won" his much as Frye had against Anderson in Quinn's rookie year.
Anderson then entered the game against the Steelers when Frye was maming the entire team look incompetent. Just as a reminder ......
Frye went 4-10 for 34 yards with an INT and 5 sacks in that game.
Anderson went 13-28 for 184 with 1 TD and 1 INT. He was sacked exactly 1 time despite playing the majority of the game.
Posters then went on to talk of how our line was the best in the history of the NFL .... and how the team could be really good if only Anderson wasn't holding them back. Some even maintained that Frye was the better QB .. and how Holmgren taking him was a sign that he would be great ..... and the heir apparant in Seattle.
Anyway .... fast forward to that 3rd season for Anderson, and we can all recall his ups, ups, ups, and downs. Fast forward to this, Quinn's 3rd season ... and it's been all downs, all the time so far. (mostly a lot of 4th downs)
Now, I'm not prepared to claim that Quinn is a bust ...... but man he sure is on the path. The lights don't appear to have come on for this kid. Considering that he ran a similar offense in college ..... there should be, at the very least, a dim candle burning. More frightening is that his accuracy and downfield throws seem to be a horrific experience for all involved. So far Quinn has gone 1-7 in passes longer than 20 yards. He looks like he's trying to direct the ball rather than passing it. This happens to a lot of QBs entering the league ... and they typically exit the league in short order as well.
People want to use the term "game manager" to refer to a guy who takes care of the ball ..... has a high completion percentage ... and the like .....
Kosar is often a guy people use as an example.
Kosar didn't hit 60% of his passes until his 3rd season. He only did so 4 times out of his 9 years as a starer. His average per attempt was 6.9 .... but that really nosedived as the Browns fortunes did the same.
Bernie did, however, attack down the field. He hit receivers where they could make plays. He didn't dink and dunk .... he took that route often as a 3rd option rather as the first.
It's rather ironic that the play that got Kosar his 1 way ticket out of Cleveland .... and earned Bill Belichick eternal scorn .... this play wasn't a screen ..... it wasn't a dump off .... it was a deep ball for a TD.
Anyway .... my point is that Quinn, thus far, looks less capable that Anderson did with similar time/games under their resective belts. That's frightening, considering Quinn pedigree and pre-draft hype.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338 |
All I hope is if Quinn looks like the same incompetent QB he has the last two weeks, they pull him and insert DA. If he can't get first downs, can't keep the Defense off the field and most importantly..score these things called TD's which you need to win games...he needs to take a seat. Even the bad DA was never as bad as the good Quinn, and that is saying alot since Quinn throws 3 yard outs. Why noone talks about his horrible accuracy also baffles me...I remember several on here stating you can't win with a QB who's accuracy (completion percentage) is below 60%..guess what.. The excuses are old and the justification is laughable. Why so many people excuse this guy for looking like the second coming of Rick Mirer..  i don't know why. If he holds the ball like he has the past two weeks..we can expect to see DA by the second Quarter.
"Going from 4-12 to 6-10 isn't good enough. I believe we are going to be better than that. We're going to be a lot better than that." - Mike Holmgren (3/15/12)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802 |
Just so you know.... "Unnamed QB Savior" who's numbers are bad but still better than Quinn is no one else but Tim Couch, the last QB we had that beat the Steelers.
Politicians are puppets, y'all. Let's get Geppetto!
Formerly 4yikes2yoshi0
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,482
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,482 |
Quote:
If you're going to play the stats game, you can't begin to compare them until you have an equal sample size. You don't have to be a statistician to know that. "Waiting" until our bye week won't get you there, so your analysis will STILL be completely invalid (statistically speaking -- which is how you are attempting to build your case).
If you're really interested in comparing stats, come back after BQ has 25+ starts under his belt. Only then will your comparison be worth reading.
That's complete unequivocal B.S. You need a large enough sample size to remove random statistical variation. Quinn has not met that requirement yet (thus why I said it's still not enough time). HOWEVER, there is absolutely zero reason to have the SAME sample size. Please take a statistics class and find where it claims you have to have the same sample size before you can compare/contrast any two measurements. Quinn doesn't need 25 starts for us to know whether he's better/worse than DA, he just needs ENOUGH. Our bye week this year is after week 8 (if I recall correctly) which gives him 6 more starts and 11 for his career. If he's trending upwards and/or getting better...I'd give him a few more starts. If he's playing just as bad then as he is now, that's PLENTY time to statistically evaluate him against DA and go from there.
The whole point of my post though, was that at this point in time Quinn is statistically inferior to DA in just about every way shape and form...which makes it laughable when I read crap like "All BQ has shown me this season...is when he sucks...he don't suck NO WHERE near as bad as DA." It's so far off base it isn't even funny.
Not to mention, if the argument is simply that Quinn's sample size is too small, that would imply that his stats have large amounts of variance (i.e. they fluctuate wildly above AND below the norm). While his sample size is small I personally find it interesting that he still falls below DA in virtually every possible category. If his stats were inconclusive simply due to variance you'd think he'd be below DA in some and well above DA in others wouldn't you?? Maybe it's just REALLY bad luck. Time will tell.
After the bye week, we need to take a long hard look and make a decision. It's not like we have Bruce Gradkowski as Quinn's backup QB here. If we did, it wouldn't matter what Quinn did this season, we'd ride him out there anyway. As it is, however, we have a QB who has PROVEN (to this point) to be the far superior QB of the two. At some point if that trend continues you HAVE to make the switch.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/GraffZ06/browns_factory_sig.jpg) Fear us, for we are the BROWNS, led by the mighty BM! Only in Cleveland.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 327
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 327 |
funny stat shown in the game today, in Flacco's first 5 games his td/int numbers were 1/7. Unfortunatly for us Flacco has the benifit of a good line, running game and great defense.
Ruining QB's since 1999.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
That looks like you're making an excuse for Quinn.
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 327
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 327 |
take it for what you want to toad, your going too read whatever you want anyway. When DA was in thier the 2nd half i said that i understood the decision even if i did not agree with it. The fact is we aren't going to win much if we can't put a team around either QB.
One of the biggest things i will knock BQ for is that when they are rushing 7 guys, someone is OPEN!!!!!
Ruining QB's since 1999.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,482
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,482 |
Quote:
funny stat shown in the game today, in Flacco's first 5 games his td/int numbers were 1/7. Unfortunatly for us Flacco has the benifit of a good line, running game and great defense.
Which is exactly why I'd be perfectly happy letting DA (no he's not an All Pro but he's at least competent) start the rest of this year AND next year. Forget drafting a QB in the top 3. Trade Quinn for extra picks. Trade down from that top 3 spot and get extra picks. WE NEED LOTS OF HELP.
I'd hope to get an extra 2nd round pick somewhere out of those deals and with my late 1st round pick and 2 2nd round picks I'd go RT/S/LB (in no particular order). 3rd and 4th rounds I'd go WR/CB/RG. Everything beyond that is BPA. Go get a vet FA to backup DA at QB.
Build the lines. Build the defense. Build the running game. Once it's there, worry about having an "elite" QB.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/GraffZ06/browns_factory_sig.jpg) Fear us, for we are the BROWNS, led by the mighty BM! Only in Cleveland.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,458
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,458 |
Quote:
Quote:
funny stat shown in the game today, in Flacco's first 5 games his td/int numbers were 1/7. Unfortunatly for us Flacco has the benifit of a good line, running game and great defense.
Which is exactly why I'd be perfectly happy letting DA (no he's not an All Pro but he's at least competent) start the rest of this year AND next year. Forget drafting a QB in the top 3. Trade Quinn for extra picks. Trade down from that top 3 spot and get extra picks. WE NEED LOTS OF HELP.
I'd hope to get an extra 2nd round pick somewhere out of those deals and with my late 1st round pick and 2 2nd round picks I'd go RT/S/LB (in no particular order). 3rd and 4th rounds I'd go WR/CB/RG. Everything beyond that is BPA. Go get a vet FA to backup DA at QB.
Build the lines. Build the defense. Build the running game. Once it's there, worry about having an "elite" QB.
Exactly. Lets hope Mangini does this.
I wish to wash my Irish wristwatch......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,847
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,847 |
You think we'd actually get "picks", as in plural, for Quinn? I'd be tickled with getting a 5 round pick for him at this point.
He needs to look in the mirror and decide if he's an nfl qb, or a pretty boy.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum quinn talk part 3
|
|