Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 10 11
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
I really do not want a QB this year, especially when I think the best pro prospect cannot even declare in Jacory Harris.

Gimme an impact defensive player.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,074
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,074
Quote:

Hmmm 5 out of your 9 picks are SEC guys.




I picked that many from other conferences?? I might have to re-think my strategy.


When in doubt...draft the SEC guy.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
I thought it was when in doubt ask yourself "What would Tim Tebow do?"

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
LOL

I am not above anyone on this board. There are several people on here who I think know quite a bit more football than me. Diam, Toad, and Attack are all apart of that club. That's why I love talking about the draft and football with them. Candyman also knows a lot about the draft. I will say that you know more about it than most.

And of course my opinion will change. Like I already said, the more you see, the more you know. By draft time, I will have a set opinion. And I will be wrong. I will be wrong about how high or low players will go, and how good they will be.

Scott Wright, THE NFL Draft expert, changes his opinion even more than I do. Anyone who consistently watches a player is going to have changes in their opinion. Someone may look great one week and terrible the next. You have to take the balance of what is seen.

I have now watched Jimmy Clausen five times this year. I've formed a pretty solid opinion on him. I've watched Tim Tebow MANY times. I've developed a very solid opinion on him.

You can attack me all you want: I don't care. I have the respect of posters who I respect

Davy - Mocking Dan is a former colleague (sort of) of mine. I don't read the site though. I don't intent do put down your opinion. All I'm saying is that you could very well be right, and I have seen him make some good throws, but I've seen too many times where his arm was below average. I'm not saying his arm is Charlie Frye like, but it isn't very good.

I will add that I am a fan of dawg66's mock.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
I agree with everything you just said deep.

I'd rather have someone disagree with me then agree all the time. The only reason why I know a lot about the draft is because I quite litterally try to watch every single college football game. If it wasn't for yours or attacks input there would have been a lot of great college players I would have never had the chance to see. Even though the odds of the browns selecting these players is slim I LOVE watching college football and watching young men develop their careers and actually make it. I gurantee you guys know more about the NFL then I do but that's because I am very passionate about college football.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
1. Eric Berry - S - Tennesse
2. Anthony Davis - RT - Rutgers
3a. Brandon Graham - OLB - Michigan
3b. Charles Scott - RB - LSU
4. Dennis Pitta - TE - BYU
5a. Brandon Carter - RG - Texas Tech
5b. Alterraun Verner - CB - UCLA
6. Jay Ross - DE - ECU
7. Kelton Tindal - WR - Newberry

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Don't mean to condescend, but Davis is a top 15 pick, and Graham will likely go in the 1st.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,593
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,593
Yeah but how will you feel about those guys next week?


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
I'm stating the general consensus there. I'm not sure if I like Davis that much yet, but some people think he's a top 5 pick. I haven't seen enough to be honest. With Graham, my opinion has a 90% chance of not changing.

But I reserve the right to exercise that 10% chance.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
Quote:

Don't mean to condescend, but Davis is a top 15 pick, and Graham will likely go in the 1st.




Davis may be, but there are a lot of good tackles in this draft, and he is a RT. There are 3 or 4 guys that could go ahead of him and he very well may drop.

Graham has the talent to go Round 1 and he may, but his production has dropped this year a little, mostly from being double and tripled teamed. His stock will probably drop him some. Players drop more than anticipated all the time.

Obviously this is a bit unrealistic, but what mock in October isn't? Come combine and draft time this and most mocks will look like a joke.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
I can't argue with your points.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
Quote:

I can't argue with your points.




I understand and mostly agree with you. Davis isn't very athletic for a LT but could be dominant at RT.

Graham will probably go late Round 1 or Round 2, but maybe we get lucky for once.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Davis is a less talented version of Andre Smith IMO. Could be a good to average LT but a stud RT.

I'd love charles scott in the 3rd round!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,744
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,744
Quote:

LOL
I will say that you know more about it than most.




Well I guess that's a compliment so thank you. One thing I don't mind what you say, I mind the way you say it. You are constantly on the attack and ultra-critical. You can disagree with me that's fine but there's no need to be on the offensive every time there is a discussion.

Quote:


And of course my opinion will change. Like I already said, the more you see, the more you know. By draft time, I will have a set opinion. And I will be wrong. I will be wrong about how high or low players will go, and how good they will be.




Well its not your opinion changes...its that it changes weekly. I bet if Clausin goes out has a 24-30 360 yard 5 TD day against USC he will be right back up where he was.

Quote:


Scott Wright, THE NFL Draft expert, changes his opinion even more than I do. Anyone who consistently watches a player is going to have changes in their opinion. Someone may look great one week and terrible the next. You have to take the balance of what is seen.




HAHAHA Scott wright...THE NFL draft expert...hahah...Just because some blowhard as a website doesn't mean anything. I visit his site but he is wrong more than he is right. Case in point he graded Quinn as a franchise QB who would undoubtedly become the next great QB. I think he hit the first 3 picks in the draft right. Shoot I did that too. Scott Wright is not..not..THE NFL expert.


Also my dream draft to this point is:
Get Jake Locher in the first or a combination of Tony Pike and Eric Berry.


Go Browns!!

[Linked Image]
Loki #423696 10/14/09 09:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Could you imagine this guy and Rogers on the same d-line? I doubt it would happen because the d-line isnt the problem and the Browns have bigger needs. I think a Saftey, RT, or QB will be the first pick. But we still have FA to fill holes before we have any clue what the top needs are. I doubt the QB position will be filled in FA and there are a lot of safties to be had in this upcoming draft.

Has anyone seen the SS from Toledo? He isnt bad and would be a replacement over Sorenson in the 3-5 rounds.

Who is Suh? Only the nation's best defensive player
Oct. 13, 2009
By Dennis Dodd
CBSSports.com Senior Writer
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/12357902



It's hard to quantify. Imagine having a dog that can talk or a car that goes underwater. That's Ndamukong Suh. His game is as different as his name. Things he does aren't supposed to be done.

"I can't imagine," Missouri coach Gary Pinkel said, "a better defensive lineman in the country."

Nebraska's defensive tackle is approaching the point where he becomes the defensive equivalent of Tim Tebow -- able to control the game by himself. At 6-4, 300 pounds, he is Gumby -- able to stretch his body into places where it doesn't belong, able to achieve what no defensive tackle has done before him.


During the win at Missouri, Suh tallied six tackles, a sack, forced fumble and an interception. (US Presswire)
That's why his game is so hard to quantify. Suh, whose name is pronounced En-dom-ah-ken Soo, is coming off what might be the best game ever by a collegiate defensive tackle. On a rain-soaked Faurot Field at Missouri on Thursday, he was seemingly the only once with balance, so much so that he put together one of the more staggering lines for a tackle -- six tackles, a sack, a forced fumble, two pass breakups and an interception that led to the winning touchdown.

That's a good month for some defensive tackles. Before being drafted in the first round, LSU's Glenn Dorsey had an All-American season in 2007 making all of 69 tackles. Suh had 76 last season as a junior. That made him the first lineman to lead Nebraska in that statistic since 1973, plus the 76 tackles were the most by a Husker lineman since 1992.

Suh is tied for sixth nationally in passes defended, a category usually reserved for defensive backs. He is one of only three defensive linemen listed in the NCAA's top 100 in that category. At a position that is usually reserved for fat, stubby guys, Suh dominates. The Football Writers Association of America named him the national defensive player of the week.

How many defensive tackles do you know who can jump out of the gym? That's part of the reason why Suh has five career interceptions. Those are "outside numbers" at a "position inside" as Pinkel puts it.

"When I see him play, I think to myself that this is as good as I've seen around here," Charlie McBride, Nebraska's venerable former defensive coordinator, told the Associated Press before the season.

Former Huskers great Jason Peter wants to see a mean streak. The 1997 Outland Trophy finalist took Suh aside before the 2008 season and told him it's a matter of attitude. You see a guy's taking up the armrest next to you at the movies, knock it off. Walking down the street and dudes coming the other way? Make them move.

"You got to act like a bad [man]," Peter told Suh.

Other Links
Heisman Hopefuls

SB Nation: Suh measures up

Bleacher Report: Defensive hopefuls
Blogs
Rang's Review
The Heisman is supposed to honor the best player in country. If that player is not Suh, I have not yet seen him. More

Community
Message Boards: College football | Nebraska

No, he's not going to win the Heisman, but in college football circles they are whispering that Suh has just about locked up the Outland, the defensive equivalent of the stiff-arm.

The trophy is sponsored by the Greater Omaha Sports Committee, which would love to have one of its own in town to accept the hardware in January. Already, Suh is the nation's best defensive player, a title that he isn't likely to lose considering he is a slam-dunk top five pick in next year's draft. Pro comparisons range from Warren Sapp to Reggie White.

Nebraska would settle for him to be the next Peter. That would be a sign of progress for a program trying to re-establish itself. Peter was the last Husker All-American defensive lineman way back in 1997. That was the year of Nebraska's last national championship and only time a defensive player (Michigan's Charles Woodson) won the Heisman.

"I don't think he has a chance to win the Heisman," said Chris Huston, who operates HeismanPundit.com, which regularly polls voters across the country. "But he actually got a couple of first-place votes this week. The benefit of a guy [like Suh] going for the Heisman is that it will create that consolation effect of locking up the Outland."

Nebraska isn't doing much for Suh in the way of publicity other than to let him play. That Thursday night helped a lot, because Suh and fellow tackle Jared Crick were collapsing Missouri's line seemingly on every play. His advantage, Suh says, is lining up head up on the player in front of him. That makes it more difficult for defenses to double-team him.

"You never know where I'm going to go," Suh said. "I can go to the A gap, the B gap. We're always moving so there's really no way to just sit there and key on me. It's still tough to know where I'm going."

The Missouri game could be just an appetizer. This week the Huskers play Texas Tech and its pass-happy offense. Imagine Suh roaming free against the one-dimensional Red Raiders. Suh was neutralized in last year's meeting with Missouri, a 52-17 loss in Lincoln, but shortly after that he started to blossom. By the end of 2008, he was Nebraska's first All-Big 12 interior defensive lineman in nine years.

"There's more out there for him to get," Nebraska coach Bo Pelini said. "I don't think he's reached his potential yet."

That raises a couple of questions. Why did Suh come to Nebraska in the first place, becoming the Huskers' first scholarship player from Oregon, and why is he still around? Suh, a redshirt senior, could easily have left after last season -- the NFL projected him as a late first-, early second-round pick.

Give the reviled Bill Callahan some credit for getting the kid to Lincoln in 2005. Suh came to Nebraska because he wanted to be in an established program, even though Nebraska at the time was underachieving under the former coach. Suh stayed for a fifth year because he likes Pelini, a defensive zealot, who made a point to visit the player and his family in Portland following the season.

"I definitely thought about coming out," Suh said. "But when Coach Bo came out and spoke to my family before the bowl game, it was sort of a no-brainer for me to come back.

"It wasn't anything to persuade me to come back. It was an opportunity. I could move myself up. Then he said if I did come back he would work with me. At this point it's worth it for me to be a top 10 pick.

"I wanted to prove I wasn't a one-year wonder."

In this world of rogues and miscreants even at the college level, Suh speaks thoughtfully and articulately. His parents are divorced but he remains the proud product of his mother, an elementary teacher from Jamaica and a father who is a native of Cameroon. His name means "House of Spears" in the native tongue of the Ngema tribe.

After the career-altering Missouri game, Suh said his cell phone blew up with 27 messages, most of them from friends and family back in Oregon. Like all of us, they had seen that talking dog, that submarining car.

"The biggest thing for me was doing it on national television," Suh said. "Usually a lot of people back home don't get to see me play."

At his present pace, that's about to change. With the right cable hook-up, the NFL can be seen everywhere.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,744
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,744
Suh will be a good-great DT in the NFL. With that said one of the team strengths right now is the defensive line. We don't have enough talent across the board to pull a Vikings and have our 3 best defensive players on the defensive line. Our D would look completely different with some pass rushing OLB or a dominate Safety (Eric Berry or Mays). Then again there's the golden rule. If you don't have a franchise QB (we don't) and there is one available you draft them PERIOD. (Clausin/Locher)

Man I wish Diam would have been right.


Go Browns!!

[Linked Image]
Loki #423698 10/14/09 09:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
I agree about Suh not being a need. I want Eric Berry and would rather wait until at least the 2nd round to select a QB. Especially if Pike could fall a round or to.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
If Berry is not available we MUST draft this guy. He could be our Richard Seymour type DE. Him + Rogers on our D-line good lord....

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
At this point, so early in the scouting process, my opinions are going to be changing very often.

IF Clausen does that he may change some of my opinions. It won't change my thoughts on his arm, but maybe his decision making. Don't count on it though. Bradford and McCoy have had some huge games, but I'm not high on them.

You may not like Wright, but he is considered by nearly everyone to be the best.

On to Suh. He is a stud. Haloti Ngata minus 30 or 40 pounds. And faster.

Loki #423701 10/15/09 08:10 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Dude, it's Clausen... Not Clausin... You're driving me crazy lol.



TopDawg16 #423702 10/15/09 10:06 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,851
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,851
ok guys.. who do you take in the first?

Richard Semour?
(Suh)
or

Ed Reed?
(Eric Berry)

I think I go Berry... However.. a great push by your front 7 gives your "average" safeties more opportunities to make play...

hmmmmm....


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Neither. Jimmy Clausen.

But if you want to go defense, Taylor Mays.



Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Berry.

I don't see anything wrong with our line.

It's our OLB's that need attention. If we are gonna be drafting as high as I think we are then we will probably be able to snag a good tweener in the second and then a descent line player in the third. All depending on how the draft falls.

Might even be able to land a descent defensive lineman in FA. Seymour will be a free agent and I highly doubt he will wanna stay with the Raiders.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:

ok guys.. who do you take in the first?

Richard Semour?
(Suh)
or

Ed Reed?
(Eric Berry)

I think I go Berry... However.. a great push by your front 7 gives your "average" safeties more opportunities to make play...

hmmmmm....




Id go Berry. I hope people dont think Im pushing for Suh just because i posted the article so people know more about him. I wouldnt be upset with the pick but I stated it would be a nice addition but I think the team has bigger needs.

Berry though has already been coached by NFL caliber coaches in DC Kiffen. I think hes 5'11 198 lbs. But he has the speed to but put in as a CB and the strength to play LB in college. Elam is a FS, and Pool is a FS playing SS. Im hoping Berry can play SS right away. Pool is an UFA and I dont see him being re-signed. Saftey is not a hard transition from college to the NFL for players to make an impact. Id also like the SS from Toledo in rounds 3-5. He is a ballhawk for Toledo. He would also be an upgarde over Sorenson and play SS when he is ready and could move Berry to FS. That would be a decent young Safty tandem. Sorenson plays specail teams but how many specail teams players do we need that arent ready to see the field as backups when their name is called? We already have Constanza and the new guy from the Jets.

I also would mind a mauling RT. I wouldnt doubt if Mangini trades for more picks and takes a RT later in the draft or maybe the safty from Georgia to save cap room. ManKok seems to love saving cap room.

D-line isnt that old and dont have any FAs leaving after this season. Rogers, Williams, Smith, Rubin, Coleman, Mosley are all decent enough to have back next year as a unit. Drafting Suh and having him or Rogers playing DE would be nice to see though. Baltimore puts Ngata on Thomas and Steinbachs side when they play Cleveland.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
how often do we see the QB sitting back there ready to pick apart our secondary?

I go Suh....everytime. I think he will be a great DE.

Plus, I think Mangini can find a S in the 2nd or 3rd round...sure, not a Berry or Mays....but who was more important to the Pats success? Seymore or Harrison? I think Seymore but maybe some of you disagree.


#gmstrong
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 553
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 553
KC is supposedly shopping Glenn Dorsey and Derrick Johnson.

ranty article quoting NFL network


A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.

John Barrymore
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Even though the Browns d-line is not the weakness, there are no FAs leaving at the end of the year, I would not be upset about the pick. He would upgrade the team. Lets not forget the possibility of an injury but even if it were to happen, I still think they go in a differant direction.

Your right about adding a safety later in the draft. This draft seams to be heavy in safeties.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
Quote:

how often do we see the QB sitting back there ready to pick apart our secondary?

I go Suh....everytime. I think he will be a great DE.

Plus, I think Mangini can find a S in the 2nd or 3rd round...sure, not a Berry or Mays....but who was more important to the Pats success? Seymore or Harrison? I think Seymore but maybe some of you disagree.




Berry has Ed Reed potential, not Rodney Harrison potential. Harrison was good, but he wasn't Ed Reed.

I wouldn't be upset with the Suh pick and think he can be great, I'd just prefer Berry at this point.

hooter #423710 10/15/09 04:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
The reason they are being dangled is because they don't fit the 3-4. And some people told me I was crazy when I suggested this might happen when it was announced they were switching to the 3-4.

hooter #423711 10/15/09 04:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:

KC is supposedly shopping Glenn Dorsey and Derrick Johnson.

ranty article quoting NFL network




That article criticized Pioli and Haley for trading Gonzalez? Didnt he say he wanted to be traded to a playoff contendor because he didnt want to go thru a rebuilding process? Like the Browns trading Edwards and Winslow (I still miss him), it needed to be done. High priced players that wouldnt contribute down the road so you might as well get some picks. Im sure if Pioli thought the team would be contenders, he would have kept the TE and made life a little easier for his prized QB.

As far as Johnson. Id take him over Barton. Him and Jackson would be 2 MLBs that could go sideline to sideline while the other takes on a blocker.

Dorsey playing next to Rogers would create havoc. Im assuming Dorsey is playing NT. He would be great as a DE but Im sure he is that teams best option to stick in the middle.

I doubt this new regime wants to give up all these picks they been collecting and plus, even though it needs upgraded, the defense isnt the problem. They traded away Thigpen and I dont think they would want Quinn.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Dorsey is playing end for them and he sucks. He isn't a 3-4 player. He focuses too much on penetrating and he chooses gaps.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Isn't the main knock on Dorsey right now that he isn't built to play in the 3-4 scheme? If he does have the ability to be successful in this scheme, then why would the Chiefs trade him in the first place? He also has a monster contract.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
Quote:

Why not play....here goes:


Round3a DeMardo Murray, RB, Oklahoma (wanted RT, but none I love there)
Round3b Tony Pike, QB, Cincy (going off others opinions that he should be higher as I haven't seen much of him)




Dream on with either being available there.


"The medium for the bad news was ESPN, which figured. The network represents much of what is loud, obnoxious and empty in sports today."
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
No where near the dream you seem to think it is. Especially if Murray, if he's stupid enough to declare.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:

Dorsey is playing end for them and he sucks. He isn't a 3-4 player. He focuses too much on penetrating and he chooses gaps.




I wouldnt know because I havnt watched him play so I'll take your word for it. Just because he doesnt fit one 3-4 team doesnt mean he couldnt play for another. I do see him being more of a dominant DT like Sapp in a 4-3. Im sure he would rather have a couple guys around him to eat up o-lineman so he could make plays.

I wouldnt trade for him. Maybe DJ to play in the middle but Mangini has his boy Barton, 2 picks to play MLB in Veikune and Maiva, plus they just got Trusnik.

Dequell Jackson is a UFA at the end of the year but Im sure they find a way to keep him. Maybe not a franchise tag. He is undervalued because he gets no recognition on this defense. Plus, name one play were he turned the game around in his whole career. So I dont see him getting paid the average of the top 5 LBs. I see that tag being used on Vickers. It wouldnt cost the team much to franchise Vickers. Maybe a Transition tag so a team would have to give the browns a 1st and a 3rd like the tag on DA or a pick where they player was selected like a 2nd rounder. The Transition tag would also give the Browns the right to match any offer would would still be cheaper than a Franchise tag.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
Pike is considered by many to be top 3 qb in this draft, no way he makes til the bottom end of the 3rd. Not happening.

Where I am having trouble with this draft class is evaluating/getting a feeling for ILBers. Anyone know of a stud or some players to keep an eye on saturdays outside of Brandon Spikes?

Last edited by AndraDavis4MVP; 10/15/09 05:16 PM.

"The medium for the bad news was ESPN, which figured. The network represents much of what is loud, obnoxious and empty in sports today."
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Never say never... Duke Robinson dropped to the 5th last year.

Rolando McClain of Alabama is a stud ILB. Much better than Spikes IMO.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:

Quote:





Round3b Tony Pike, QB, Cincy (going off others opinions that he should be higher as I haven't seen much of him)









If you havnt seen much of him, tonights your chance to see Pike to make your own opinion. Plus hes going up against Selvie, I name Ive seen on this board as a 3-4 pass rushing OLB, a few times.

It should be a good game. Watching 2 ranked undefeated conferance rivals playing against one another and a couple prospects that could fit onto the Browns in the 2010 draft in rounds 2-3.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,649
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,649
J/C

Round 1: Russell Okung, Offensive Tackle, Oklahoma State

Round 2: Tim Tebow - Total Mangini type player. - Tebow can play multiple positions and has all the intangibles that Mangini looks for.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
As much as I like Okung, I don't see him being a productive right tackle. Too small and weak run blocking.

Page 3 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 10 11
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum PRE- MIDseason Mock Drafts.. Post Here:

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5