|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521 |
Quote:
Quote:
Brady does not want to play for this team
Link?
There have been plenty of links already posted on this forum regarding Quinn's "disappointment in Mangini" with being benched and saying that he can still be a good QB in the NFL; an article from PFT citing a league source saying that Quinn is being "a bitch" in being backhanded about getting out of Cleveland; reports that he and Mangini have been at odds verbally; his decision to "pay tribute" to Braylon by wearing his shoes. Most of them are in the "Is Quinn being dangled..." thread. I'm sure you've read it, so you can find the links there for yourself. He knows that the best way to get a ticket out of Cleveland is to make it apparent that you don't want to be there.
Turk, BigWillie...is there some problem you have with me?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849 |
We do NOT have to get a new QB... that is the common misconception here in Cleveland, and the reason why we continue to be non contenders year to year...
Because we are always focusing on the QB spot.. ALWAYS!! Yes we do need a legit QB.. and we may have one.. but we would be doing our QB more of a favor by focusing on defense and the running game. That would open up things for both DA and Quinn.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 183
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 183 |
You don't think he should be pissed? He was given all of 2.5 games to suck, while Anderson is given 2.5 years to suck. I want a guy on my team that wants to play and thinks he is better than the guy in front of him, if he doesn't have that ego he wouldn't be in the league. The bitch here is Mangini, not Quinn.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,316
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,316 |
both suck....deadbate is right...personally, I'd like to give Quinn a few more starts to make sure he really does suck that bad
I'm coming home, I'm coming home, tell the world I'm coming home
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well, he can't be any worse than what we've witnessed the last 2 weeks.
I take it you forget the first two weeks of the season.
I think people are clinging to the hope that the QB of the future is on this team.
Are you seriously saying DA has looked better the last 2 weeks? Seriously? I'm not saying Brady was better, but he was not worse than this.
You're not saying Brady was better, but he wasn't worse? So what was he?
The only thing I know is that DA scores touchdowns and Brady doesn't. In reality, the two QB's are both so bad, that is the only thing that matters.
But if you want to give Brady the rest of the season, go ahead, just so the fan base can see what Brady really is, then we can go sign a QB.
you had a good run Hank.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521 |
He should be pissed at himself for squandering his opportunity. He was handed the reigns to the team carte blanche and played so poorly that his coach had to go back on his word to start him all season regardless of performance. You have to play really freaking badly for that to happen. He had no semblance of competency in his three starts this season. Absolutely none whatsoever. It took his team being down three touchdowns with three minutes left in the fourth for him to even look mediocre.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 183
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 183 |
Well, Anderson has played worse since then. That is a by the numbers fact. Without the Cribbs returns in the Cinci game it wouldn't have even been close. I don't like Quinn (I hate anything ND), but Anderson is simply one of the 3 worst starting QB's in the league and can single handedly lose winnable games with his poor throws/decisions/ball handling.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521 |
You can say he's played worse by the numbers, but we were never out of any of the games DA started, with the exception of when it got late in the fourth today. That's why you can't just look at the numbers. You can point to Quinn's 400 yards passing and say he's playing well without considering that half of those yards came when he had no hope of coming back down several scores.
Against Minny and Denver, when we were down by 10 or more and BQ was still throwing the ball three yards past the LOS, you knew there was no way we were coming back.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 183
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 183 |
The ONLY reason we weren't out of the games DA played in was Josh Cribbs. That's it. It sure wasn't DA. And again, I don't like Quinn either, but DA is already done in the NFL and we might as well make 100% sure on BQ before we ditch him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825 |
Quote:
Quinn is averaging 8.88 yards a pass....45 completions 400 yards......so while he may be dinking and dunking...
400 yards on 45 completions is not 8.88 per pass.........to get a per pass number, you need to include all his passes - ya know, the incomplete ones as well.
Now, to say he's averaging 8,88 yds per reception would be correct. If your yards and receptions numbers are right.
What's that mean? Not much. But your wording was wrong, for what it's worth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521 |
So you really think that if you inserted BQ into any of those games that he would've been as successful if not moreso? The only reason we were in the Vikings game at halftime was because of Cribbs, and we all saw how BQ did in the second half of that one.
I understand why you think we should play Quinn. I just think its a poor reason that makes little sense.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quinn is averaging 8.88 yards a pass....45 completions 400 yards......so while he may be dinking and dunking...
400 yards on 45 completions is not 8.88 per pass.........to get a per pass number, you need to include all his passes - ya know, the incomplete ones as well.
Now, to say he's averaging 8,88 yds per reception would be correct. If your yards and receptions numbers are right.
What's that mean? Not much. But your wording was wrong, for what it's worth.
Yes...my wording was wrong...I was referring to completions...and felt it was implied...but it probably was not.....I think the point still stands though...even if my wording does not.
HACK
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064 |
Now I see why "The Decision" took so long. Neither is worth this. Instead of film, tackle. Just tackle. All week, throw; all week, cover; all week, blitz. Shed blockers, fly to the ball, and for Gawd's sake, get better. The same crap, week after week, and we do nothing to help ourselves. It is either refusal or arrogance, ignorance or complacency that makes us sitting ducks for this freaking ineptness that is allowed to go on. Shame on the sidelines. Bench the OC. 
"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
Quote:
Quote:
Well, he can't be any worse than what we've witnessed the last 2 weeks.
I take it you forget the first two weeks of the season.
I think people are clinging to the hope that the QB of the future is on this team.
No, sadly I remember them.. and no, he still couldn't be much worse than the last 2 weeks. How could he be worse? Could he make LESS than 2 completions in a game? Could he turn the ball over MORE than 3 times by himself? Could he score LESS than 13 offensive points in 2 complete games?
If, in fact, BQ was put in to drive his final nails in the coffin and he did it.. then DA must have gone out and bought himself a nail gun... 
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521 |
j/c...
I think I just might have to change my stance on the the QB. Put BQ in and let him dig his own grave. Then all the people who just have to see what he can do will finally be done with it, and he'll become the next Timmay around here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223 |
Pretty much like DA has done. DA has just done it for longer.
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044 |
Quinn needs to stay on the bench the rest of the year
This team has no one who can catch, and a terrible right side of the OL...Quinn will get murdered out there
Leave Anderson in there, Maybe Quinn gets a shot next year with better players around him
you can't judge EITHER of these Qb with the garbage that is around them
of course I figure Da will want out after this year, and I cna't blame him....
Quinn will wish we never traded with The Cowboys for him.....
it would be insane to switch Qb now....we have no line and no skill positions....atleast Quinn had Edwards for a few games(Edwards is a bum, but still better then what we currently have)
putting Quinn in now would be setting the kid up for failure....
I say the best route for this team is
1. Trade Quinn at years end. 2. Da becomes a backup 3. Bring in a veternan QB...no drafting a QB...bring a veteran...say what you want, but I'd like to get Mike Vick
I know what vick did to the animals, but maybe he really is sorry, and besides...the guy has a set of wheels on him and makes some big time plays....
we can get 4 good years out of Vick while we groom a QB behind him
and draft all other positions in the NFL draft
putting Quinn out there now would be setting the kid up to fail..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,133
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,133 |
Quote:
I know what vick did to the animals, but maybe he really is sorry,

And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul. - John Muir
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 172
2nd String
|
2nd String
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 172 |
Quote:
j/c...
I think I just might have to change my stance on the the QB. Put BQ in and let him dig his own grave. Then all the people who just have to see what he can do will finally be done with it, and he'll become the next Timmay around here.
That's pretty much all I've been saying. I'm not saying that it's a given he will miraculously become good if he's put back in. If he does come back in and dig his own grave, then so be it. I wouldn't be mad at that. At least I would know for sure that he sucks. I would be mad if we gave up on him after 2.5 games, and he goes to another team and turns out good. That would ... me off to know end. Even more so if we were still floundering around with DA, or any other scrub.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521 |
But I want it for purely selfish reasons.
As for him going to another team and being successful, I couldn't really care less about that because it wasn't going to happen here.
I mean, really, if he went to a team like the Patriots or the Colts or the Giants and found himself starting by some stroke of luck, would you really be all that surprised if he started lighting it up? If he went to another bottom-feeder like KC or Oakland or something, it would tell me either A) that team's issue rested pretty much solely within the QB position; B) our problems go way beyond the QB position; or, more likely, a combination of both. But no two teams or situations are the same, so I really can't get too upset if we trade away a busted prospect who flourishes elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716 |
Quote:
Quote:
I know what vick did to the animals, but maybe he really is sorry,
No way can you have Vick playing weekly in front of the DAWG POUND.....there would be no end to the ridicule.....no matter how well Vick did or did not play.
HACK
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520 |
Just listened to Mangini post game presser.. When asked about possible QB changes he said " I'm NOT looking to make a change"
So DA fans.. enjoy. The rest of us will hope good DA shows up someday.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024 |
Quote:
Just listened to Mangini post game presser.. When asked about possible QB changes he said " I'm NOT looking to make a change"
So DA fans.. enjoy. The rest of us will hope good DA shows up someday.
If he really means it and sticks to it, what that does that say about Quinn?
LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 172
2nd String
|
2nd String
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 172 |
Quote:
But I want it for purely selfish reasons.
As for him going to another team and being successful, I couldn't really care less about that because it wasn't going to happen here.
I mean, really, if he went to a team like the Patriots or the Colts or the Giants and found himself starting by some stroke of luck, would you really be all that surprised if he started lighting it up? If he went to another bottom-feeder like KC or Oakland or something, it would tell me either A) that team's issue rested pretty much solely within the QB position; B) our problems go way beyond the QB position; or, more likely, a combination of both. But no two teams or situations are the same, so I really can't get too upset if we trade away a busted prospect who flourishes elsewhere.
Of course you do. Because you want to go around saying, "I told you so." I get that. And of course I wouldn't be too surprised if he went to the Pats, Colts, or Giants, and played well. Look at those teams. I still don't understand how you can call Quinn a busted prospect after 2.5 games.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521 |
Because when he played last preseason, he sucked. When he played last regular season, he sucked. When he played this preseason, he sucked. And once he got named the starter he sucked more than he ever has. His hallmark game is a loss to Denver last year.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,532
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,532 |
The self rightous will never allow that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 974
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 974 |
Quote:
Just listened to Mangini post game presser.. When asked about possible QB changes he said " I'm NOT looking to make a change"
So DA fans.. enjoy. The rest of us will hope good DA shows up someday.
Interesting, I heard that also.
I don't think either are all that great, it's sort of funny to see all the debate about it.
We're trying to throw the ball downfield and he checked the ball down to Trent Richardson and the Indians on the choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465 |
Quote:
Quote:
Might as well start it, & yes I am knee-jerking, but maybe for good reason. Should we start thinking about Brady again? I personally don't think we will next week, not yet.... but let's face it the offense still blows... and a fair bit of it is on DA, not all but man... Will BQ get another shot? If DA fails to move the ball next week vs. Packers, or commits more turnovers, IMO we might start BQ in the second half.
Another reason to go go back to Quinn would be be to give him one final chance, after his "decompression" as Toad put it.
I think it would be a good idea to go back to Quinn next week, at home, vs Green Bay. Here's why, IMO.
Hopefully he'll have the home crowd behind him.
We didn't use the wildcat as much with Quinn as we are now. That could open it up for him.
Our OC has to figure out a way to put Quinn in a better position to succeed. Get the WR's moving across the field so he can hit them on the run. I don't see enough quick slants in our offense either. You don't have to wait until you get inside the 10 to use a slant. Quick slants open up the outside. It seems like the only routes our WR's run are comeback routes.
We have Green Bay, @ Chicago, then the bye week. That gives Quinn a couple games to get his feet wet again. Then you use the bye week to work on the mistakes. If Quinn still doesn't get it by the SD game. I don't know what.
I agree. We already saw what DA could do. The Browns went up against dome of the best defenses in the league so far this year. DA actually had 2 of the easiest starts against Buffaloes and Cincys defense. Ive always had to problems with DA when Im rooting for hin as the starter. The first problem was that DA stares down his targets. He has improved on that. His second problem is the velocity of his passes. the Browns are getting a lot of drops but part of it is the way the ball is coming at them. We all already know and have heard that if a NFL WR that gets paid millions of dollars should catch the ball if it hits their hands. They get paid to catch the ball. I do realize that the WR and TE position needs improved greatly. But if DA is the leader of this team and has the knowledge of a QB, then he should realize by now that if his targets cant catch bullets on the run (while reaching back on a full sprint or timing the ball over their head). He needs to put more touch/loft/finese on the ball. Yeah DA can throw a perfect spiral dart but when Im watching his passes they are line drive, sinking, darts. He throws that way to the RBs too. RBs are built differant and most have shorter arms, especially Lewis. DA dont need to throw a bullet, like he is pitching in the World Series to a RB 5 yards away. Its like DA thinks that if he gets the ball to the target then he is doing his job and and its on the target to do the rest. Which is right for the most part but not at that velocity. I saw a pass to harrison where he was running 5 yards deep across the field. DA threw a bullet low and behind him. He got his hands on the pass but on a full sprint he had to reach back and bend down to catch. Harrison had a step on the LB covering him with a wide open field between him and the sideline. If DA just lobbed the ball and lead Harrison to the open field, he had a step on the LB and he would have been the first person to the ball. Harrison also would be able to use his strength (speed), to seperate from almost any LB, while the ball is in the air.
I heard during the game that DAs WRs did a drill while they were 10 yards away and DA would throw at them as hard as he could. I dont think the coaches are setting the team up for success right. If you dont have the targets that can catch sinking dart passes, then the QB/offensive leader needs to make the adjustments to the targets. Obviosly just keep throwing sinking dart laser passes isnt working and some adjustments need to be made. Considering the OC is still in the training on site process, I dont think he realizes that hes the coach and he needs to have DA make these adjustments. Nobody on this board can tell me that its easier to be running from one sideline to the other sideline, even with nobody covering you, to run in a full sprint 5 yards deep and catch a sinking bullet while reaching down and behind you ON A FULL SPRINT, then it is to be a QB a lead your target 5 yards deep, having a step on the defender, and lob the pass in front of your target with nothing but open field in front of him.
I think if Mangini would make the switch now then the downfield targets would appreciate how the ball is being thrown to them and easier for them to make the catch. You can say the targets are paid to make the catch all you want, the fact of the matter is that these targets arent good enought to make those kind of catches so DA NEEDS TO ADJUST to what his targets can do. Good QB to WR tandems spend time with each other learning tendencies and figuring out where the target likes the ball. As a team, you have to do what it takes to make it easier for each other. DA is not being the teammate he needs to be by putting his target in a position for him to make the play. He must think that if he throws the bullet in the targets area, its all on him to do the rest. He should know by now that he can do that when he had Edwards (who caught more downfield and over his head), Winslow, and Joe Jurevicious, that those guys were good enough to make those catches. His backfield and Royal are not. Just like DA wasnt being a good teammate to Quinn and helping Quinn on the sidelines after the offense came off the field. DA was alwasy laughing and mucking it up with the 3rd stringer that he didnt have to compete with. Now that Quinn is on the sideline, he goes over to the QB and OC to listen and learn to what the OC is trying to do. Daboll didnt do that with Quinn like he is doing with Anderson. Some say that its because Daboll is trying to play catchup with Anderson because Quinn was the opening day starter. I dont believe that is true because they both had the same oppurtunities in camp. Its almost like Daboll is treating DA like his prized pupil and Quinn is the step child. Daboll has even admitted that both QBs have differant games and that he has to use differant gameplans for both QBs. I cant go back and scroll thru threads to find the exact article/qoute I read that from but Im sure someone else remembers posting it or reading it. Also, by watching the playcalling, I see a differant gameplan. If the defense is putting 8 in the box to stop Quinn, its up to the OC to create plays to beat that or allow the QB to make adjustments.
I dont think its coincidence that people that were rooting against Quinn, while most just thought DA was the better QB and better chance to succeed, that are not here now backing up DAs performance. You can say that the drops are all on the targets but I still think that DA needs to make adjustment to how the target can catch the ball or make the play. Another point on how he puts too much velocity on the ball is that the passes that aint dropped fly over the targets head. This is something I dont think DA can learn to do a better job at and make the proper adjustments. He knows what his targets can and cannot do (at least he better know he the leader on offense) and he needs to put them in the proper situation. DA is a decent QB that has his faults but he is a QB that needs great catchers. He is not a QB that can make his teammates better. I dont think he is a leader that tried to make his teammates better and tell his targets to brush it off in the huddle. He does more of a hissy fit and shakes his head, kinda like the mangini bobble head shake. I do realize hes frusterated because hes trying to show the coaches that its the targets and not him so dont bench him. Im starting to think more and more that since Mangini has admitted this is a rebuilding year after week 3, that if hes going to lose he might as well lose and save the $11 million Quinn could reach playing 70% of the offensive snaps. You can call that a conspiracy theory all you want but Ive heard of it happening before in a few pro sports to save money. Its almost like Mangini dont want either QB but since he is losing, save the money, and have a 20 week training camp for the rest of the team.
I think DA has faltered just as much, if not more than Quinn in his previouse starts to show he isnt the man. Even if he startes the rest of the year, he has shown that he isnt the long term awnser. But I think putting Quinn in now gives the team the best chance of winning. We know what DA can do and its time to let Quinn learn and get more playing time. If anything, these past 3 weeks would give him the time to reflect on what he was doing wrong and he can see what DA is doing to make the coaches give him playing time. But Im afraid even if Mangini wasnt that bullheaded to make another switch, Daboll would just call a differant gameplan again. Even the announcers (I know thats not a good referance with some of the idiots on CBS) were qustioning Daboll for not going back to the wildcat when it marched the offense and kept them on the field. Even if they give it to Lewis every 4 downs for a 2 yard game up the middle. Im guessing they are trying to keep the defense honest, and give Cribbs the oppurtunity to make 8 yards on 2 plays.
Im stealing this idea from a buddy of mine that said this during todays game. He said if they are going to keeping giving lewis the ball and send him up the middle, the whole defense is right there and collapsing the holes. it dont matter who the o-line is on that call. he said hand if off to Lewis out of the wildcat and when the defense collapses on him like that, he should turn around and flip it back to Cribbs like a flea flicker and give him the oppurtunity to pass the ball or run with it almost like a punt return. If he keeps the ball all he would have to do is cut the corner and he has an open field to beat the DBs. If Daboll would do this and put the teams playmakers in open space to make a play, then maybe people would question his lack of creativity. Its almost like Daboll dont have the balls to call a play and see it not work. Even if it didnt work, how would it be any worse then what they are doing now? It would also keep the defense on its toes and make them back off the line giving Lewis a little more momentum next time they run him up the middle.
I going to take a breath now. 
Im rooting for whoever is in but Id rather see Quinn get another shot after what I saw from DA the past 3 weeks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465 |
Quote:
both suck....deadbate is right...personally, I'd like to give Quinn a few more starts to make sure he really does suck that bad
Thats a shorter way of saying what I want if you dont have time to read my last post. i just had a lot to say about the topic and we talked about it for hours at the bar earlier.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
Quote:
I mean, really, if he went to a team like the Patriots or the Colts or the Giants and found himself starting by some stroke of luck, would you really be all that surprised if he started lighting it up?
Yeah.
Ride DA out this year. Ship Quinn for a fifth while he still has minimal value. Sign a a vet to take the lumps for a year or two. Send DA to the bench, or out of town for another fifth rounder. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292 |
I hate DA's screen passes, but I like his willingness to go deep. I hate DA's head-scratching INT's, but I like his willingness to go deep. I hate DA's lack of touch, but I like his willingness to go deep.
Not that I ever had both feet firmly entrenched on the bandwagon, but I am off the DA bandwagon again. I have no idea about our future quarterback situation.
You watch guys like Ben, T. Brady, Brees, the Mannings and others, and think "why can't we ever get a good QB? Why is our QB situation always in disarray, & with so much uncertainty?"
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
Quote:
DA has completed 11 the last two weeks
According to either Grossi or PLuto, there were 7 drops today by Browns receivers. I don't recall the exact number, but I believe they listed something like 8 drops last week against Buffalo.
Assuming those numbers are accurate, that's 15 drops in 2 games.
So no matter who's back there at QB, they aren't going to look good when the receivers are leading the entire NFL by a wide margin in drops.
Anderson isn't a great QB. That isn't news. Anderson isn't nearly the reason this offense is sputtering. That shouldn't be news, but too many people want to lay the blame on him.
To answer the actual question of the "debate" Anderson didn't look at all lost out there in the 1st half to me. I had to leave for work and didn't see the 2nd half, but what I did see of Anderson was a guy who wasn't perfect with his throws, but had very good throws dropped over and over again. I also saw a Steelers defense that was in our backfield far too quickly for any QB to make perfect throws, though many fans now expect that.
I'm becoming very firm in my previous stances regarding both Quinn and Anderson. Quinn lacks accuracy on anything that isn't dinked, and Anderson's upside is only so high. In fact, Anderson won't be the kind of QB who can make the team better. He's going to play as well as the rest of the parts because he's not very bright, and not very athletic. That big arm works when he can step into every throw, but that isn't going to happen for him like it did in 07. That was a magic year and probably the very best Anderson will ever be, and while that's ok for a transitional guy, that's not good enough to make a real push for the playoffs.
So back to Quinn.............He absolutely had to be more ready to take over this year, but wasn't. That's a direct indictment to his abilities. When given the chance to face adversity, he wilted and was benched. To be benched that quick means the organization didn't believe in him that firmly to begin with, which is an indirect indictment against his work in preseason.
So where are we? Which way to go? I think it's unfair to blame Anderson as much as is happening. The receivers are playing like a bunch of rookies (Robo, Mass, Harrison) never-wasses (Royal, Lewis) and has-beens (Furrey). Anderson is doing exactly what he's capable of doing, which is to play well when others play well, but play poorly when others play poorly. To expect Anderson to make big strides has always been unrealistic. The best I personally ever dreamed of was to see marginal improvement where Anderson could limit his turnovers and make the occasional play to win games, giving him a ratings in the mid 80's over the course of a year. This team isn't going to be good enough for him to do that, not with the way the blockers are blocking and the receivers are (not) receiving.
IMHO is it time to go back to Quinn? Nope. Why would I feel that way? Because the single biggest reason Anderson is struggling is because the primary receivers are rookies who aren't even ready to be starting in this league. So knowing what we know about Quinn and how he totally collapsed at trying to get the ball downfield, why should I expect him to keep throwing them the ball to help them develop?
The answer is there's no reason to expect that.
So if the only way our offense is going to grow is to have the receivers grow, Anderson is the guy to help them along their way.
Sadly, with what we saw from Quinn, Anderson is still the better choice to win a game today, and what's even more sad (as if that were possible) is that with Quinn in the game, the receivers won't get better because he can't get them the ball.
No, I'm sticking with Anderson right now, but because of reasons that have nothing to do with confidence in his ability to become a reliable starter.
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,758
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,758 |
I say DA gets one more half... I mean.. he has been dismal.. DA simply is not improving by any means... he has no pocket awareness.. and it seems like he has no idea where to go.. the one time I did see him actually step up into the pocket like he should to avoid the outside rush that would go past him if he did was when there was barely any pocket to step up into.. DA likes to run backwards toooo much..
If doesn't show a better performance, we are better off to throw quinn in just to make sure we are doing the right thing before we go into the next draft and and pick or not pick a new qb.
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](http://i.imgur.com/FUKyw.png) "Don't be burdened by regrets or make your failures an obsession or become embittered or possessed by ruined hopes"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195 |
The season is lost, nothing says that better than trading away your #1 receiver and starting a bunch of rookie receivers. Now simply put, there are 11 million reasons you aren't going to see Quinn again until sometime after the bye week, regardless of how much we struggle on offense.
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
Quote:
his decision to "pay tribute" to Braylon by wearing his shoes
I still don't recall anything specifically saying he WAS wearing Braylon's shoes. Do you know anyone who would wear someone elses shoes? Especially an athletic cleat? I think it was a joke.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,560
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,560 |
I think there are a couple of factors.
First, I think BQ has said or done something above and beyond the shoes that will keep him on the bench.....but that is pure speculation on my part.
I do find it odd BQ is nowhere to be seen on the sideline. What happened to the days of the back-up being right up there with the coach and other qb, trying to stay in the game??
Another factor is right now BQ has sucked. Forget Anderson at this point. Just focus on BQ.
Why would we want to hand him 11 million more dollars by GIVING him his 70% of the snaps when we aren't sure he is worth what he is making now??
I think, if my first though is unfounded, we may see Quinn back in later in the season for another look once it becomes impossible for him to meet the 70% of snaps mark.
Some may call it dirty pool. I call it managing the cap.
I haven't seen anything in Quinn to this point that tells me he is worth just handing 11 million more. He doesn't even act interested in what the team is doing.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
I saw a couple shots with him and DA on the sideline.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,560
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,560 |
Quote:
I saw a couple shots with him and DA on the sideline.
Good deal...I guess I just missed it.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
Quote:
If he really means it and sticks to it, what that does that say about Quinn?
It says one of two things.. one being quite simply that BQ really does suck that bad.. or two being that they still see some promise in BQ but don't want to throw him into this mess to just look really really bad again... and honestly, I could believe either of those are true at this point.
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Quote:
hisbutt.com........he pulls info out of there quite often...lol.
At this point I would wait until the bye week, and then sit the team downn and explain to them that there will be no more switching BQ is the guy for the rest of the year. My reasoning is that we need to make sure Quinn isn't it.........after 3 years we know that DA isn't it. I doubt (highly might I add) that Quinn is the answer, but you have to make sure that he isn't before we cut him lose, and get another one.
Before any decision is made on BQ , the Browns have to see what he is..and he is a bust so be it but he's got to get in there and play and if he's not the QB of the future perhaps if his play improved there will be a bigger market for him..thats it.. I've seen enough..more than enough of Mr.Anderson..
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum "Switch to BQ" debate
|
|