Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
Switch back to BQ? Sure, why not. Might as well spread the misery of having absolutely NO weapons to work with around. Neither QB is going to show much in the environment Mangini has created for them to work in.

As long as we're going to be force-fed this offensive manure, we might as well get as much variety as possible. I'm bored with the "DA Turnover." I think I'd like another portion of "BQ Dink and Dunk" for a couple of games now.


[color:"white"]"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."

-- Mark Twain [/color]
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 183
B
1st String
Offline
1st String
B
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 183
Watch the game. Many of those drops were bad throws from DA (either too hard, behind, or low). When all of your throws are off target it becomes very difficult not to drop some of them. The difference between our receivers and other teams isn't that they drop a higher percentage of accurate throws, it's that they see more bad throws than any other receiver in the league.

Let's also remember that DA wasn't really that good in 2007. He had the best protection in the league that year and had everything he threw caught, yet still was only 17th in rating and 28th in completion percentage (plus had a 1300 yard rusher).

Finally, to all those who are worried about the 70% caveat on BQ (which I am as well since he isn't worth the cash), remember that between DA's playing time plus running the wildcat 10-12 snaps a game, Quinn won't get there anyways even if he starts Sunday.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Quote:

Watch the game. Many of those drops were bad throws from DA (either too hard, behind, or low). When all of your throws are off target it becomes very difficult not to drop some of them. The difference between our receivers and other teams isn't that they drop a higher percentage of accurate throws, it's that they see more bad throws than any other receiver in the league.

Let's also remember that DA wasn't really that good in 2007. He had the best protection in the league that year and had everything he threw caught, yet still was only 17th in rating and 28th in completion percentage (plus had a 1300 yard rusher).

Finally, to all those who are worried about the 70% caveat on BQ (which I am as well since he isn't worth the cash), remember that between DA's playing time plus running the wildcat 10-12 snaps a game, Quinn won't get there anyways even if he starts Sunday.




He needed to play 11 games to hit that escalator. He's played in 2.5 so far, there are 10 games left. That would give him 12.5, there is no way you're going to see BQ before the bye week and I'd bet they aren't going to toss him out there against Baltimore but wait until the next week when we play Detroit.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Interesting logic..and kinda one I touched on..since he wasn't lighting thing up they aren't paying those escalators for poor performance..but when they can play him without those factors..they will..

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quick thoughts to anybody that cares to answer since almost everybody seems to be in the "fill all of the holes before drafting a QB" mode...

Of the teams that are 4-2 or better, the QBs of those teams are (in no particular order)... Tom Brady, Carson Palmer, Ben Roethlisberger, Peyton Manning, Kyle Orton, Eli Manning, Brett Favre, Drew Brees, and Matt Ryan...

Of the other teams that are .500 or better you have... Sanchez, Flacco, Garrard, Schaub, Rivers (for now), Romo, McNabb, Cutler, Rodgers, Hill, and Warner..

Of the teams that are under .500 you have... Pennington/Henne, Edwards, Anderson/Quinn, Collins, Russell, Cassel, Campbell, Stafford/Culpepper, Delhomme, Johnson, Wallace/Hasselbeck, and Bulger

It seems pretty straight line to me with only a few exceptions.. so is it a coincidence that elite QBs seem to have more talent around them or do elite QBs just make their teams that much better?

Orton is the only guy in the top group that isn't considered an elite QB but more of a "game manager"..

Hill is the only guy in the middle group that people would question as being a "good QB"....

Delhomme and Bulger are the only guys in the bottom group that have had any real success.. I exclude Hasselbeck because Seattle is 2-1 in the 3 games he has started and finished and 0-3 in the games he either didn't finish or didn't play so it's hard to know where they might be if he was on the field...

I don't know, I'm struggling to get my mind around this... simple logic would dictate that at least one or two "great" QBs would find themselves on a "talentless" team and fall to the bottom... or that a couple talentless QBs would find themselves on a loaded team and rise to the top... for the most part it doesn't seem to work that way though... So how much more talent would we really NEED to be in the .500 or better group if we had an elite QB on this team? Not the undefeated group mind you... just the .500 or better group.

Just thinking out loud...


yebat' Putin
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Draft to help our QB... whoever it may be..

but it is obvious our problems are other spots than QB..

DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!!

BLOCKING!! BLOCKING!! BLOCKING!!

Last but not least.. draft Legarette Blount on Day 2.. He is worth the chance.. especially as a 5th/6th round pick... We already lost a 6th rounder to the Jags.. what would be the difference of drafting Blount and if he doesn't work out.. cut him.. (ie Maurice Claurett). Low risk.. but could be a HUGE reward.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
DC, while I've been in that mode of thinking fix all the areas before getting a QB..here's the thing..if the Browns could get a FA QB that is a better upgrade over the two QBs on this team..then that would be the route to go for a year..
However after watching a few more games Saturday..I may back off of that if Clausen comes out..if he continues to show improvement and he is very accurate...if he comes out..draft him..hey draft him and still get a FA QB.

The reality is with a load of picks the Browns(if KoMan is smart) can get a QB and still address a lot of the needs..not to mention FA..they should be able to plug some holes..a trade here or there should bring in another pick..

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Quote:

Quote:

If he really means it and sticks to it, what that does that say about Quinn?



It says one of two things.. one being quite simply that BQ really does suck that bad.. or two being that they still see some promise in BQ but don't want to throw him into this mess to just look really really bad again... and honestly, I could believe either of those are true at this point.




I still am of the opinion that Quinn was pulled because he was having trouble because of some kind of mental block. I think the fact that he wouldn't look downfield is the reason for him being pulled, not because he sucked.

With all the talk about the Browns players preferring DA does give me some pause. I would hope the reason that we are staying with DA has more to do with protecting Quinn and not because DA is clearly better.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,656
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,656
Quote:

The reality is with a load of picks the Browns(if KoMan is smart) can get a QB and still address a lot of the needs..not to mention FA..they should be able to plug some holes..a trade here or there should bring in another pick..




This is the direction I'd like to see the Browns go. They have money to spend in FA, and they have a ton of draft picks. I don't think it has to be, build the team first and then find the QB later in this case. They can do both now, even if they plan to let the QB sit for a year. I watched Clausen this weekend and liked a lot of what I saw. Unlike some dolts, I wouldn't be leary of him just because he's another ND QB.


There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do.
-Derek Jeter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
I think its a little from column A and a little from column B. I'd argue that Kurt Warner and Donovan McNabb are much better QBs than Sanchez, Ryan, and Orton, but their teams aren't doing as well. On the flipside, Matt Cassell went 10-5 as the starting QB of a very talented New England team last year but is 1-5 so far on a bad Kansas City team this year. Was Cassell successful in NE because he's an excellent QB, or because he was an average QB playing on a great team? I think its a safe bet that a good team will perform better with an average quarterback than a bad team will with a great quarterback.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,556
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,556
It isn't that I would be against drafting a qb, I just don't think any projected in this draft are worth higher than maybe pick 25.

Just because each draft has it's best qb, it doesn't mean they are any good.

If there was a Peyton Manning in this draft, by all means, draft him.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
It's a nice chicken or the egg question. Does a great QB make an average team great or can a great team make an average QB great?

Without doing a lot of research as to answer this properly would take, I look at Steve Young, a bust in Tampa but when poised to take over a great team in San Francisco turned out to be a great QB. Obviously you would always want a good combination of both but where do you start? On first blush I'd build the team as play makers will always make plays, plug in the QB to be great later.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:

Does a great QB make an average team great or can a great team make an average QB great?



I would say both of those are possible but to be "great" you seem to need a great QB... it doesn't have to be a guy who is great every year, like Manning, you can have a guy that has his one year and is then done.. could that be Orton? Don't know, still a lot of football to go this year.... problem is that we are below average at both... which is a bad combination.

What I don't believe is that we need 6 new offensive studs before it's worth drafting a QB... my two biggest needs on this offense right now (aside from QB) are RT and TE... I'd certainly take upgrades at a couple other positions and I'd love to have a veteran WR that runs great routes and catches the ball and blocks... but you give me a solid RT and a good well-rounded TE that can catch and I think this offense is decent.... I'm not talking great, I'm talking decent if you take those players and add the right QB...


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
I think it's best to look at the issue as a grey matter rather than black or white, but if forced to take a side I'd have to say it's the team.

Peyton never lifted a ragtag Colts team to glory...he got thrown into a nasty fire, and survived the burns while they built the team around him competently (it's worth noting he's had one offensive coordinator in his career).

Brady, Flacco and Ben all walked into great situations...had we taken Brady over Spergon Wynn, I imagine he'd be selling insurance right now.

I highly doubt it, but perhaps if Philly took Couch he'd still be in the league.

It's all wild speculation...but I think a QB is only as good as his cast. He can certainly help or hurt them from there...but there's only so much one guy can do.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

Switch back to BQ? Sure, why not. Might as well spread the misery of having absolutely NO weapons to work with around. Neither QB is going to show much in the environment Mangini has created for them to work in.




That's a good jumping-off point to note a bullseye set of comments from Pluto regarding the game:

Quote:

1. When a team has played six games and has yet to record a touchdown from its tailback or a wide receiver, that screams about the need for an impact player on offense. The Browns' only rushing touchdown of the season is from Derek Anderson. Catching touchdown passes are tight ends Robert Royal and Steve Heiden, along with fullback Lawrence Vickers. You only need one hand to count that the Browns' offense has scored four touchdowns.

2. Some of this is on the quarterback, but it's mainly a team issue. Imagine you are an opposing defensive coordinator. What Browns worry you? We're not talking special teams with Joshua Cribbs. OK, Cribbs in the long-snapping, non-traditional Wildcat formation is a concern. Or perhaps Cribbs on a reverse. But that's it. Anderson can throw long, but there is no big-play receiver. Nor is there a veteran in the slot who can consistently pick up a first down, much as Joe Jurevicius did in 2007.

8. Anderson had up to seven passes dropped, but his touch on short passes has been poor. One thing the Browns stressed to Anderson was don't turn the ball over, but he lost two fumbles. He made a very poor throw on an interception. Nonetheless, I am not ready to start the drumbeat for Brady Quinn. Let Anderson at least play through the bye week. Coach Eric Mangini gave no indication of a quarterback change coming.




There's much more, but that's the pertinent info.

Throwing Quinn back in there won't do anything for the team, the receivers, or the quarterback himself. Not at this point. It'd be best to try and let these green receivers get used to the NFL before throwing Quinn back in there.

I'm fully comfortable with what I believe Anderson to be. While I'm not optimistic about Quinn, he's more of an unanswered question, but now isn't the time to throw him back into the fire.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
j/c

through this, i haven't heard derek anderson saying that the run game needs to get going which would make it easier to throw.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
Quote:

I'm fully comfortable with what I believe Anderson to be. While I'm not optimistic about Quinn, he's more of an unanswered question, but now isn't the time to throw him back into the fire.




How can you be comfortable with Anderson after what he's done? If it were Quinn putting up the same terrible performances, he'd be benched in a heartbeat right now, as well he should be. If we were any other team in the league with even remotely adequate standards, we'd be rioting in the streets to give the guy who we've seen for a whopping 2.5 games this year another shot.

I cannot fathom being comfortable with a guy throwing 11-41 with 1 TD, 2 picks and 2 fumbles in 2 games. I don't care who is dropping what, I don't care how bad this or that is, there is literally no excuse for being an NFL QB and putting up those kinds of numbers.

I don't know that Quinn is better but I know that I still have some semblance of standards left and DA is falling woefully short of them. The fact that so many are just happy to coast along as an embarassment is quite frankly starting to drive me mad.


We're... we're good?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:

How can you be comfortable with Anderson after what he's done?



Allow me to interpret... He's comfortable that he knows how good Anderson is and/or can be... he's not saying he's "comfortable" with him in the game... hope that helps.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Quote:

What I don't believe is that we need 6 new offensive studs before it's worth drafting a QB... my two biggest needs on this offense right now (aside from QB) are RT and TE... I'd certainly take upgrades at a couple other positions and I'd love to have a veteran WR that runs great routes and catches the ball and blocks... but you give me a solid RT and a good well-rounded TE that can catch and I think this offense is decent.... I'm not talking great, I'm talking decent if you take those players and add the right QB...




I don't believe we need 6 new studs on the offense either. I'd rather we bring in as mentioned a RT, TE and instead of the QB maybe an RB. Then focus on the defensive side of the ball. If we don't get into shoot outs we don't have a QB that's pressured to perform at the top of his game every play.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Yes.

Please cement the fact that Quinn sucks. I know that DA does. I need to be sure that Quinn does before I'd support a top draft pick for another college kid.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
L
Legend
OP Online
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
That's what I'm thinking.
It would be foolish to not give him another chance: one final, last opportunity to seize the job. Surely to hell he isn't as bad as he showed the first three weeks. No frigging way.
I am so down on DA right now... this pop-gun offense is not all his doing, but his faults drive me insane.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,651
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,651
I will wait until after the greenbay game to make a decision. There is a bye, and with the extra time we can decide.

I have not see anything from anderson that suggests he should be the QB after the bye. But, 3 games is 3 games.


Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 172
C
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 172
Quote:

I will wait until after the greenbay game to make a decision. There is a bye, and with the extra time we can decide.

I have not see anything from anderson that suggests he should be the QB after the bye. But, 3 games is 3 games.




I have a feeling that Quinn will be back in there after the bye.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449
Quote:

Why would we want to hand him 11 million more dollars by GIVING him his 70% of the snaps when we aren't sure he is worth what he is making now??

I think, if my first though is unfounded, we may see Quinn back in later in the season for another look once it becomes impossible for him to meet the 70% of snaps mark.

Some may call it dirty pool. I call it managing the cap.





I have no problem with it at all...we are already over paying one QB....

#426198 10/20/09 08:49 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2009/10/eric_mangini_reaffirms_support.html

Quote:

Eric Mangini reaffirms support for Browns QB Derek Anderson, regardless of statistics
By Mary Kay Cabot
October 19, 2009, 9:07PM
Thomas Ondrey/The Plain DealerEric Mangini made it clear on Monday that he's fully supporting Derek Anderson as the Browns starter, regardless of Anderson's current statistics.
Livingston: Roster doesn't help Browns' QBs
Kosar: Quinn could use a fresh start
Insider: Nothing imminent on trade front
Mangini press conference | Browns forumBEREA, Ohio -- Brady Quinn might still be on the roster when the trading deadline passes at 4 p.m. Tuesday, but it doesn't mean he'll be playing anytime soon, regardless of how bad the offense is.

Whenever the subject of Quinn replacing Derek Anderson is even broached, coach Eric Mangini crushes it like a grape.

Following Sunday's 27-14 loss to the Steelers, Mangini said, "I'm not looking to make a move, no."

So not only will Quinn be stuck in Cleveland despite the fact he'd most likely welcome a trade, he'll be on the bench for the foreseeable future.

Hey, if you can't get playing time behind a starter who's tumbled to last in the NFL with a 41.7 rating -- even behind the struggling JaMarcus Russell (51.0) -- then you might want to rent instead of buy your next dwelling in town.

Mangini's commitment to Anderson, coupled with some strong statements by Sports Illustrated's Peter King over the weekend, all point to the probable end of Quinn in Cleveland in the off-season if not by Tuesday.

During halftime of the Notre Dame-USC game on Saturday, King stated in no uncertain terms that Quinn will not be back with the Browns next season.

"Whether he goes or not [by Tuesday's trading deadline], he will not be on the Browns in 2010," said King, who interviewed Mangini and General Manager George Kokinis last week. "I believe they've had enough of Brady Quinn."

It's not known if Quinn's agent, Tom Condon, has asked for a trade, but it wouldn't be surprising if the subject came up during the Oct. 7 trade of Condon client Braylon Edwards to the Jets. Still, the Browns have no incentive for doing so unless a team makes an offer they can't refuse. If they wait until after the bye week to play him, they would avoid triggering $11 million in escalators -- and why do so if they don't know if he's their quarterback of the future?

Besides, Mangini is convinced that Anderson is the better choice right now, despite the horrible statistics.

"There have been times where we've moved the ball really effectively, and I think the drive that we had at the beginning of the second half [in Pittsburgh] is indicative of things that we can do," he said. "We have to do a much better job of not stopping ourselves whether it be with the dropped balls or some throws that are a little bit off or it could be tightening up the protection or tightening up the routes -- all those things -- I think we can get better at that.

"There were some positive things that I've seen throughout the course of Derek working at quarterback that I think will get better."

Thanks to performances by both quarterbacks, the Browns have scored only four offensive touchdowns in 72 possessions. They are:

• 31st in total offense (239.8 avg.);

• 31st in passing yards (136.2);

• 30th in first downs (13.6);

• 29th in 3rd down efficiency (27.9 percent), and

• 30th in points per game (11.5).

In addition to his dead-last rating, Anderson is last in the NFL in third-down passing at 31.7 percent. He's completed only 26.8 percent (11 of 41) of his attempts over the last two games.

But Mangini attributes that to up to 16 drops over the past two games. What's more, Anderson took the Bengals to overtime in his first start of the season, beat the Bills (albeit 6-3), and had the Browns within three points of the Steelers in the third quarter of Sunday's game.

Going 4-for-4 for 61 yards on the opening drive of the second half, Anderson threw a 1-yard TD pass to Lawrence Vickers that pulled the Browns to within 17-14. Included was a beautiful 43-yard strike to Mohamed Massaquoi. If not for a questionable call on Pittsburgh's attempt at a fourth and 1 sneak at the end of the first half, the game would've been tied at that point.

To be that close in the third quarter in Pittsburgh? Mangini will take it. The feeling is that if the drops can be minimized, the offense will improve dramatically.

"There's no excuse for it," Anderson said after the game. "We're going to continue to keep working. I've got to get better. I've got to give them better chances to catch it, be more precise on my throws. That's all we can do. There's no excuse for it, there's no reason behind it. They're good receivers, they're good players."

Mangini attributed some of rookie Mohamed Massaquoi's six drops in two weeks to "looking to run before he actually got the ball and that's something that you can't do."

Massaquoi acknowledged the young receivers have to grow up fast.

"Definitely," he said. "We definitely have to continue to grow and mature and try to do our part to make sure we can contribute and help string together some wins."

He said there's hope for the passing game because "it's clicked at certain points. That means it can click throughout the whole game and click for the rest of the season. So that part's going to come. Hopefully it comes sooner than later."






http://www.cleveland.com/ohio-sports-blog/index.ssf/2009/10/post_44.html

Quote:

Bernie Kosar says Brady Quinn could use a fresh start: Cleveland Browns morning news roundup
By Starting Blocks
October 20, 2009, 6:10AM
APBrady QuinnFormer Cleveland Browns quarterback Bernie Kosar says that Brady Quinn is probably better off he gets a new start elsewhere.

Kosar, now a consultant with the Browns, said on WKNR yesterday:

“Multiple systems and multiple coaches haven’t worked out in Cleveland. Maybe a fresh start will help him out.”

The NFL trade deadline is today.

A story in CantonRep.com speculates that several teams could use a quarterback like Quinn. Those teams include Miami, Seattle, Tennessee, Buffalo, Washington, Carolina, Oakland, Tampa Bay and St. Louis.

Kosar hesitated when asked if Quinn would be traded.

"Ummm, you know what, I think it would be tough … It’s a tough spot for him right now,” Kosar said. “I personally like seeing that he’s unhappy not playing. You don’t want a young quarterback that’s happy being a backup.

“People should cut him slack if he is frustrated and does say something that’s maybe a little negative in terms of wanting to play.

“If something’s out there …”




Progress: QB Derek Anderson has only completed 11 passes in his last two games, but coach Eric Mangini made it clear that Anderson will remain No. 1 against the Green Bay Packers on Sunday.

The Browns are 31st in the league in offense and 30th in points scored. They have scored four offensive touchdowns in 72 possessions this season, but Mangini sees progress





#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
You couldn't just tack this on the existing "Switch to BQ debate" thread?


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
A story in CantonRep.com speculates that several teams could use a quarterback like Quinn. Those teams include Miami, Seattle, Tennessee, Buffalo, Washington, Carolina, Oakland, Tampa Bay and St. Louis.



And the Browns don't need a QB??
Guess I'll start my chant for Clausen..

Damanshot #426201 10/20/09 09:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,165
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,165
Quote:

A story in CantonRep.com speculates that several teams could use a quarterback like Quinn. Those teams include Miami, Seattle, Tennessee, Buffalo, Washington, Carolina, Oakland, Tampa Bay and St. Louis.





Whoever wrote that must be pretty far out of touch with the NFL. Miami has (and loves) Henne, TN has Young, Oakland is married to Russell simply because of money, Tampa has 3 or 4 "qb's of the future" and couldn't fit BQ in if they tried.

That leaves SEA if they want someone behind Hasselbeck, Buffalo -who won't spend enough to trade, Washington since they seem to want to change everything -even though they already have a better QB in Campbell than BQ is, and the Rams if they want someone to mentor behind Bulgur. Carolina I just don't see.

BQ isn't going anywhere if those are the best candidates.

Gift Horse #426202 10/20/09 09:27 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
L
Legend
OP Online
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
So Kosar just got hired and is now suggesting BQ needs a fresh start?

Ummm.... Im love #19 but not liking his willingness to go public like that.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

lampdogg #426203 10/20/09 09:31 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,447
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,447
I got the impression that Bernie couldn't get a grip on just what Daboll was trying to do as an Offense ????

waterdawg #426204 10/20/09 12:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:

I got the impression that Bernie couldn't get a grip on just what Daboll was trying to do as an Offense ????



Does anybody have a grip on just what Daboll is trying to do as an offense?


yebat' Putin
DCDAWGFAN #426205 10/20/09 12:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,177
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,177
Too bad this organization didnt go after McDaniels, I think that Quinn and this offense would be completely different in a positive way.

Right now, it still doesnt matter who the QB is, because nobody is open. Which is why DA is like 11 of 41 or something horrible the last two games.

After seeing the games since Quinn was benched, I definitely wanna see him again, under a real offensive coordinator and at least one or two weapons. I'm not sure we gain much from playing Quinn this year, there is no talent around him, and we have a 3 year old calling plays.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Quote:

You couldn't just tack this on the existing "Switch to BQ debate" thread?




Sorry, didn' realize it was your turn to slap my hands.., who died and put you in charge Shep?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
This article on possible trades says Quinn could be moved for 2nd rounder if someone is looking for a young QB

LINK

HACK


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,440
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,440
I don't believe Quinn will be traded. I've said it before but I think DA has been given every chance to outright have the starting job for good and has one more week to prove it's his.

After the bye week when Quinn can no longer reach those incentives I believe unless DA comes out and plays lights out against the Packers we will see Quinn for the rest of the season. It was obvious his play didn't warrant paying him that large bonus but they can't trade him without putting him in the game and finding out what they have in him. It isn't like DA has proven to be far superior to Quinn. Some drives he looks better others he looks worse. That's just who DA is.

If he had come out and played well enough to not question his ability to lead this team then yes, They might trade Quinn. The fact is we still need a QB and nobody knows for sure if Quinn can be that guy.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
Quote:

I don't believe Quinn will be traded. I've said it before but I think DA has been given every chance to outright have the starting job for good and has one more week to prove it's his.

After the bye week when Quinn can no longer reach those incentives I believe unless DA comes out and plays lights out against the Packers we will see Quinn for the rest of the season. It was obvious his play didn't warrant paying him that large bonus but they can't trade him without putting him in the game and finding out what they have in him. It isn't like DA has proven to be far superior to Quinn. Some drives he looks better others he looks worse. That's just who DA is.

If he had come out and played well enough to not question his ability to lead this team then yes, They might trade Quinn. The fact is we still need a QB and nobody knows for sure if Quinn can be that guy.




Makes a lot of sense...but Mangini and the Browns would be walking a tightrope with future contracts if players even think there is a chance they could get benched with the idea of not having to pay out incentives for playing time.

HACK


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:

This article on possible trades says Quinn could be moved for 2nd rounder if someone is looking for a young QB

LINK

HACK




That link also said the Patriots couldnt find any takers for Galloway. Would Galloway be an upgrade to this teams WRs? I dont see why he would come here outside of a paycheck but if he signed a one year deal and can catch DAs bullets, it would give him a longer career if thats what he wants for himself. Id rather give him a look and keep Cribbs as a returner and wildcat/gimmick player. I dont know who I would want to see cut though.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
Quote:

Quote:

This article on possible trades says Quinn could be moved for 2nd rounder if someone is looking for a young QB

LINK

HACK




That link also said the Patriots couldnt find any takers for Galloway. Would Galloway be an upgrade to this teams WRs? I dont see why he would come here outside of a paycheck but if he signed a one year deal and can catch DAs bullets, it would give him a longer career if thats what he wants for himself. Id rather give him a look and keep Cribbs as a returner and wildcat/gimmick player. I dont know who I would want to see cut though.




Pats cut Galloway today....I've heard the Ravens might be trying to sign him....but there were also rumors the Ravens were trying to trade for Galloway...as well as TO

HACK


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

That link also said the Patriots couldnt find any takers for Galloway. Would Galloway be an upgrade to this teams WRs?




Our season is over. There's no point in bringing in a fading veteran receiver when the most important thing is to develop the young receiver we have. So marching 37-year old GAlloway out there while sending someone like Robo or Mass to the bench is a very, very bad idea.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Galloway heading to Kansas City
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on October 20, 2009 1:24 PM ET
Joey Galloway wasn't good enough to stick in New England's receiver rotation, but there may be a spot for him in Kansas City.

Christopher Price of WEEI in Boston writes on Twitter that Galloway is on his way to Kansas City for a workout with the Chiefs.

Kansas City is thin at wide receiver, with Mark Bradley, Bobby Wade, and Bobby Engram behind Dwayne Bowe on the depth chart. Bradley has been somewhat productive (177 yards), but has suffered from a number of mental mistakes.

Galloway struggled to adapt to New England's system, but he didn't struggle getting open too badly in his first few games. He did struggle catching the ball.

web page


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum "Switch to BQ" debate

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5