Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#447221 12/21/09 07:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
J
2nd String
OP Offline
2nd String
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
Hey guys (new to the boards here as a poster but I've been a long-time lurker).

I think it's safe to say that with Jamal retiring at year's end, along with Jerome Harris' contract expiring in '10, we are going to need a decision (and stability) in the back-field if we're going to progress.

We have some positives: 11 draft picks, and a QB that a few teams might still hold interest in, being Anderson.

Normally, I wouldn't have mentioned Anderson as part of the trade; his value has gone down quite a bit but Carolina is in need of a younger QB, and possibly a stop-gap until they find the man. Matt Moore may be that man (he was impressive against Minnesota), but also, he may not be. Jake Delhomme is on a severe decline and he's not getting any younger. Him and Anderson have similar playing styles: both have big arms.

DeAngelo Williams' Carolina contract ends in 2011, and from observation, it appears the Carolina fans much prefer Williams to Stewart as the work-horse. Jonathan Stewart is a powerful back, and has excellent vision for his size (he's also only 22-years old); he's the perfect back for the division we play in with the likes of Mendenhall, Benson and Rice. All three are power backs. All three of them are still rather young, and entering their primes.

What do you think of us acquiring Jonathan Stewart from the Panthers for draft picks + Anderson? Stewart MIGHT be expensive but again, with observation, many of the Panthers' fans don't believe they will get equal compensation for where they drafted him (#13 overall). We can re-sign Harrison and the two can compliment one another with their different styles.

Back-by-committee systems don't last long, especially when both backs are feature backs. Williams and Stewart can't co-exist forever. It's happening in Tennessee (LenDale has been phased out), it happened in New York (Ward is gone), it happened in Pittsburgh (Mendenhall is the #1, Parker has also been phased out).

With Holmgren coming in, we can restore what the organization has been known for; running the ball. Stewart is the mold to accomplish that.

Thoughts?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Not for me thanks. We have too many needs to go piling picks onto one position.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Carolina would demand a 1st round pick for Stewart, so no thanks...he is cheap and they are at no or little risk of losing him anytime soon.

with the way RBs get injured in today's NFL....you need at least 2 and they have 2 very good ones.

I like his style....and it's a good thought, but likely a pipe-dream.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
I have been thinking about a way to get him all year. My dream scenario would have been if Braylon would have reached the receptionn mark and we could have landed the Jets second round pick, then package Corey Williams and a second round pick to Carolina since they're defensive line is hurting so bad.

With the emergence of Rubin it might not be a bad idea to land a defensive lineman in the draft and try and package a deal with Rogers and a pick.

I don't think Carolina is going to be too interested in Derek Anderson.

But if there was a back in the league I would be willing to trade for it would be Jonathan Stewart. My second choice would be Michael Bush. All depending on what Harrison shows these last few games getting the bulk of the carries.

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 626
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 626
Jonathan Stewart is a Jerome Harrison clone. We already have one on the roster that we drafted. Maybe keeping our own players who perform would be good for once.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Why would any team take on Anderson's $7 million roster bonus plus salary for next season? AKA - if anyone wants him, he'll be a free agent in a couple months.

As per RB, I'm perfectly content with seeing what we have with Davis, Jennings, and Harrison next season. Afterall, we've been a decent running team since Jamal was put on IR.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
remember that Carolina's DL is hurting so much because of injuries. they have some good DTs on IR. So they may not want Corey Williams so badly as depth as to make them weak somewhere else.


#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Jonathan Stewart is the polar opposite of Harrison. Stewart is a bruising back who pounds it out.

I'd love to get him, but I don't consider it likely. They'd be stupid to get rid of a player as young and talented as he.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
J
2nd String
OP Offline
2nd String
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
Quote:

Jonathan Stewart is a Jerome Harrison clone. We already have one on the roster that we drafted. Maybe keeping our own players who perform would be good for once.




Jonathan Stewart
Height: 5-10 Weight: 235 Age: 22

Jerome Harrison
Height: 5-9 Weight: 205 Age: 26



And no one (not me, anyhow) is suggesting to trade players that already produce.

Quote:

Why would any team take on Anderson's $7 million roster bonus plus salary for next season? AKA - if anyone wants him, he'll be a free agent in a couple months.




He's not a free agent in 2010 unless we cut him. His contract is up after next year.

Anderson doesn't have a $7 million dollar roster bonus in 2010. It's $2 million; his base salary is $7.45 million according to rotoworld.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,186
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,186
Yes. Him and Williams compliment each other quite well.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Quote:


Quote:

Why would any team take on Anderson's $7 million roster bonus plus salary for next season? AKA - if anyone wants him, he'll be a free agent in a couple months.




He's not a free agent in 2010 unless we cut him. His contract is up after next year.

Anderson doesn't have a $7 million dollar roster bonus in 2010. It's $2 million; his base salary is $7.45 million according to rotoworld.




I know when his contract expires. Read between the lines, Anderson will not be on the Browns next year with those numbers (sorry, I was just going off of what some talking head on the tv said last week - or I got the salary and bonus mixed up). AKA - if anyone wants him, he'll be a free agent in a couple months.

Last edited by clwb419; 12/21/09 08:48 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
We certainly aren't going to pay him 7.5 million to ride the pine.


#GMSTRONG
Tulsa #447233 12/21/09 08:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
exactly!

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
J
2nd String
OP Offline
2nd String
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
Quote:

exactly!




And if he agrees to re-negotiate his deal?

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
We can just get Legarrette Blount.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,530
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,530
I like Stewart a lot as a RB for us. However, I think we would have to too high of a draft pick to acquire him, i.e. 1st or 2nd and 3rd (just speculating) making it not really practical and in all likelihood improbable. We can't afford to give up that high of picks with more pressing needs on our end, IMO. I don't think floating Anderson out there would swing the trade in our favor either.

It would be nice to see him in our backfield though.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Teams don't trade talented and productive first round picks in their second year. Ever.

Haus #447238 12/21/09 11:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
They do when they can get some value out of him and have one franchise back in Williams and another very capable back in Sutton.

If they got the right offer he would be gone, guaranteed.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Quote:

Quote:

exactly!




And if he agrees to re-negotiate his deal?




if he renegotiates his deal - well..
+ first he wouldn't do it without cash up front
+ second, for his own personal security, he'd ask for more than just a 1 year contract
+ third, I don't see why the Browns would re-negotiate just to trade him away and take a cap hit (the cash up front would escalate to the first year)

then there's the whole trade thing...
+ first, why would Carolina do this? Why tear apart the 3rd ranked rushing attack in the league?
+ second, what would Carolina see in Anderson that would make them want him?
+ third, why would Carolina take a cap hit of about 6.5 million (off of his base contract - 3 years of the 10.795M guarantee) or more (not sure if he's hit incentives)?
+ fourth, what would we trade along with Anderson to get him? He was #13 overall and while splitting time with Williams the last 2 years, he's going to end up with roughly 1800 yards and 20 TDs rushing over that time. He's proven himself in his short time and Carolina would expect an offer they couldn't refuse. That pretty much means our first round pick, plus Anderson, and likely one of our RBs. Would they even consider that, considering the exorbitant cost of a top 5 pick (and don't forget the 6.5 million cap hit they already took for trading him)? The only other alternative I could think of would be Anderson, a back, our 2nd rounder this year and a top 10 protected first rounder next year - but trades like that don't happen in the nfl often (if ever?)
+ fifth, why would Holmgren do this? Since Jamal went on IR, our running game has back to back 100+ yard rushers, and have moved up to the #11 rushing attack in the NFL (sure that's inflated by this past weekend, but the facts are that we're #11).
+ sixth, watching Carolina beat Minnesota (a top 10 defense) with Matt Moore (ironically also a former Beaver player), they might already have their QB of the future. what does Anderson show that would make Carolina move away from Moore?

I just don't see this trade being done unless we mortgage our future for him (ala Ricky Williams trade or Cutler trade). If Holmgren does that will all the holes we have on this team, Lerner should fire him and then just sell the team.

Last edited by clwb419; 12/22/09 02:35 AM.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
V
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
V
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
I thought the same thing while watching the game.Namely what it might take to acquire Williams or Stewart. Although I definately wouldn't complain if we got Stewart, I don't think he would come cheap. I do agree with the idea of drafting Blount. If I remember correctly Scout rankings have him projected somewhere around round 5.I think that would be the better option at this point.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,013
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,013
i think it would be cheaper to make a reasonable offer to Dallas for Choice. I would take either Choice or Jones, but with Barber as their solid #1, Jones offers more of the homerun threat, whereas Choice has been a more balanced #2...

i think that Harrison, Choice, and Jennings could be a legitimate committee at RB until we are in a position to find a stud. now, maybe Dallas would want too much, i don't know...but they're clearly letting some value sit on the pine with all 3 talented backs. and IF we were to switch back to a 4-3, there may be a DL or two we'd be willing to part with along with the Jets pick, e.g.


Browns fans are born with it...
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 798
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 798
I like Stewart, but I also don't want to give up picks for him. To me, LenDale White is intriguing b/c he could be an unrestricted free agent this year (provided a new CBA gets done) and we wouldn't have to give up picks. He also will not want to sit on the bench while Chris Johnson gets all the carries. I haven't seen a lot of him, but from what I have seen I like his power running style.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:

Jonathan Stewart is a Jerome Harrison clone. We already have one on the roster that we drafted. Maybe keeping our own players who perform would be good for once.




I love this statement. But who says Harrison wants to stay? The past 2 regimes rarely gave him oppurtunities.

Instead of saying,"This will never work" id rather discuss the possibilities with the poster instead of shooting him down.

Caraoline will have a new coach. Most likely Cowher. I think he keeps both RBs. I dont think he would want to keep Delhomme. Delhomme wont lead a team to a playoff win the rest of his career, so get rid of him. Unless the QB takes a reduction in his salary. A big one. With Steve Smith and a running game, DA could fit in nicley. At least for a year or 2 while the new coach grooms his successor. DA doesnt like to spend time helping out his competition though.

If Cowher is their new coach, he will most likely switch to the 3-4 and want some vets familiar with the 3-4. Mangini might switch to the 4-3. If Lebeau retires, Tomlin may go back to the 4-3 he ran in Minnesota. Those treams might be interested in each others defensive players, I would love Peppers. Ive seen the DE take over games by himself. Especially against the Browns pre- Joe Thomas. Its possible one of the RBs isnt what the new coach wants and very possible the new regime gets rid of him. New regimes always trade away bigger names.


"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it."- Thomas Jefferson on Freedom of Speech
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Quote:

They do when they can get some value out of him and have one franchise back in Williams and another very capable back in Sutton.

If they got the right offer he would be gone, guaranteed.



No team ever trades their first round pick in their second year when they are working out so well. Yes, Williams is an absolute stud, but the Panthers knew that when they took Stewart 13th overall. Sutton was an undrafted free agent this year with 12 carries.. I don't think he factors into it much.

The only conceivable way (besides grossly overpaying) something might go down is if/when Fox gets fired, maybe the new coach won't subscribe to the two-back approach. I still doubt it would happen.

Haus #447245 12/23/09 11:56 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
And no they actually DIDN'T know he was a stud when they drafted Stewart. Williams was there for two years before he really broke out and that was Stewart's rookie year. The Panthers used him sparingly and he was made to share carries because it was believed that he wasn't big enough to handle a full load between the tackles and they didn't want to risk getting him hurt.


Speaking of John Fox, I would love to have him here if for some reason Holmgren decides to let Mangini go and Carolina fires Fox.

Carolina has been one of my favorite teams since they were an expansion team and the Browns were gone. John Fox is a damn good coach.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,627
1
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
1
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,627
Show me 1 example of a well liked, productive 1st rounder in his second year, regardless of who else is on the team or at his position, that gets traded for anything ever. They'd rightfully ask for the sun and moon.




"Team Chemistry No Match for Team Biology" (Onion Sports Headline)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Like I said if they got the right offer he would be gone. Not saying that what they would be asking for wouldn't be higher than what I would be willing to give.

All i'm saying is that I would like to have the guy, I wouldn't over pay for him but he would be nice to have.

Teams will be sniffing him out next season and it wouldn't shock me to see a team able to land him.

And technically he would be going into his third year not his second.....

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 11
D
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
D
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 11
lol. Panthers have no reason to deal him. Stewart-Williams is what that team is made up. They have really no QB of the future, Steve Smith is a solid WR, but nothing outside of him is worth mentioning.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
The best LT/RT combo in the league is worth mentioning with Jordan Gross and Jeff Otah. Too bad they're both on IR or Carolina would be having a much better year(they're my NFC team because of all the time I spent in North Carolina). Shows you the importance of a good o-line.


[Linked Image from i190.photobucket.com]
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
J
2nd String
OP Offline
2nd String
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
Quote:

Show me 1 example of a well liked, productive 1st rounder in his second year, regardless of who else is on the team or at his position, that gets traded for anything ever. They'd rightfully ask for the sun and moon.




There's no doubt the asking price would be high, but the question is, is Stewart worth that price? Are we willing to give what they are asking if possible?

And I know the general consensus would be no; because we don't have any business trading picks that could potentially rebuild our team for one player. If the price were right, however..

It reminds me of the LT/Turner situation in San Diego a few years ago. Eventually, both are going to want the big money. That may benefit those interested in one of the two backs.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Quote:

There's no doubt the asking price would be high, but the question is, is Stewart worth that price? Are we willing to give what they are asking if possible?

And I know the general consensus would be no; because we don't have any business trading picks that could potentially rebuild our team for one player. If the price were right, however..

It reminds me of the LT/Turner situation in San Diego a few years ago. Eventually, both are going to want the big money. That may benefit those interested in one of the two backs.




It's a silly premise as the price is never going to be right.

Running back is not a position of glaring need on this team and we have plenty of positions that are glaring needs, LB, Corner, OL and so on. Wasting our resources on an FA RB would be fatally stupid for this team.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
What do you think the "right" price is?

It would require at least two 1st round picks probably more.

Stewart is a 22 year old running back that might go over 1000 yards while not even being the featured back. He's gotten 18 TDs over the last two years. He's 23rd in the league in carries and 5th in rushing TDs so it's not like he's just sitting on the bench going to waste. There is absolutely no chance of us getting Stewart.


[Linked Image from i190.photobucket.com]
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
J
2nd String
OP Offline
2nd String
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
Quote:

What do you think the "right" price is?




Probably the same as Tulsa's:

Quote:

It's a silly premise as the price is never going to be right.




But if this is a I don't want him at all type of proposal, maybe not. The idea that it would take at least two first-round picks is questionable, though. Most of the Carolina fans I've discussed this with don't even think they would get the original return on the pick they used to draft him, which was #13 overall (and I know that fans don't view their team the same way as the front-office, but it gives an internal generalization towards Stewart's worth).

I really would not mind giving up a future first-round pick to get Stewart, but not our 2010 first-rounder. If Lewis retires, we are left with Jennings, Harrison (whose contract is up after this season), and James Davis. We have to address this situation sooner or later if none of the three can produce consistently.

A consistent running game is crucial towards the development of any young QB. If we don't have a consistent running game, and we bring in a rookie, or an inexperienced QB later-- well.. it wouldn't hurt to inquire during the off-season.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
J
2nd String
OP Offline
2nd String
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
I think the cat is out of the bag.. that boy is getting more expensive by the minute..

28 rushes for 206, and 1 TD today against NY.

DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Jonathan Stewart

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5