Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,445
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,445
Quote:

I think Mangini believes in what he says and is proud of what the team has done. I also believe he is a persuasive speaker in that real...keep him or not, I think Holmgren is going to be impressed and at least feel a little bit like he gave the guy a short stick if he lets him go.




Holmgren's professionalism dictates he at least meet with him...

He gave him a list...

He's bringing in a GM he KNOWS will not work with Mangini...

This is gonna be a 1 and Done meeting...

By tomorrow he's GONE...

Reason???...Philosophical differences...

Last edited by Dawg in Dayton; 01/05/10 06:51 PM.

Go Browns!!!
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
1
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
1
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
One of the most exciting things I think is that Holmgren SHOULD produce a true lineage here and that should keep the organization on the same track for quite a few years!

Whoever he brings in as GM or whatever position may be able to step in and continue on. Now if this thing is a succes we may very well loose some people but I'd imagine someone will glean enough info from the man to continue in Cleveland for some time!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
In my best Sherlock Holmes fashion I have deducted a lot from Holmgren's presser.

1. He viewed a lot of local press as Small time Nobody's...yes you...what's your name - "Mary Kay Cabot" in a humbled voice...lol I got a kick out of that.

2. Holmgren without a doubt was Impressed with the way this team had played and as he said not on the 4 game streak alone...but he then went on in a different question to state there are diffrent indications - especially a young team...especially a new team. He stated how it reminded him of his 3rd year when all of a sudden Hassleback "GOT IT" and Sean Alexander came on...and all though their record was not good - they felt good how they grew and got better and ended the season...To go onto the next year and make a Playoff/SB run!

3. Holmgren is impressed and will now meet with Mangini...TOMORROW, hmmm coincidence that Randy got weathered in and canceled till tomorrow. Looks like the sit down will be with Randy and Mangini to talk about the Browns....this is good for Mangini!

4. The only questions on Mangini is how well he plays with the other kids...and that seems to be the key area...not philosophy of Offenses or Defenses - if Mangini in his convo comes across as a Bully in the making as somebody with ego issues and cannot play well with others...HE WILL BE KICKED OUT OF SCHOOL.

So only if Mangini is the Leach of the NFL and so into himself and not flexible at all...it seems like he stays!

5. Holmgren talked about the organization and putting it all together...this all came about the KOKINIS thing and I think again it was Mangini just over running Kokinis maybe not as a power thing just Mangini so focused on what he was doing he didn't realize he Ran Kokinis over with the Truck he was driving. That seemed to be the main concern...Cohesiveness of the organization.

6. One last thing sort of ties in with 1...The press treated Mangini the last power guy we got as if he was a Ball Boy returning here...They treated Holmgren like he was the President of the U.S.A. not only the Browns.

JMHO


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,342
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,342
Quote:


We seem to have a board full of Miss Cleo's around here acting like they know what's going to happen when in fact none of us know SQUAT.




I knew this would happen, too.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Quote:

1. He viewed a lot of local press as Small time Nobody's...yes you...what's your name - "Mary Kay Cabot" in a humbled voice...lol I got a kick out of that.




I noticed the same thing. He would point directly at them and say you. It was pretty funny.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:

He's bringing in a GM he KNOWS will not work with Mangini...




d in d...if Heckert is the guy Holmgren wants as his GM, it is not likely that Mangini stays, IMO.

I don't know if there are personal differences between Heckert and Mangini, but Heckert did suddenly withdraw from consideration for the Browns GM position last year, once Mangini was named HC.

Philosophical differences...yep, for sure...


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Let's see...............A leads to B leads to C leads to D............

A) Heckert didn't care for having Mangini as the head coach of the Browns so he turned down the chance at the job

B) Holmgren's first choice for GM appears to be his old WCO buddy Heckert, so

C) Since Holmgren is now running the show and is doing things the way Heckert wants them done, verified by the fact Heckert is here, says that

D) Mangini better hope like Hell that Heckert doesn't get the gig


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Am I correct in assuming Heckert can't get the job until the Eagles are eliminated?

If so, I expect Heckert will meet with Holmgren after Mangini does. That way Holmgren can discuss how his meeting with Mangini went with Heckert and he can give his opinion.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
I'm going to guess that Holmgren sits down with Gini' first, and then brings in the GM for interview.

Seeing the history between the GM at hand, and Gini, is not a good thing for Gini. He will probably go, OR if Holmgreen decides to wait it out on the decision about Gini, he will ask Heckert who he thinks would be a good candidate and then compare Gini's resume to whose ever name is brought to the table.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

Am I correct in assuming Heckert can't get the job until the Eagles are eliminated?

If so, I expect Heckert will meet with Holmgren after Mangini does. That way Holmgren can discuss how his meeting with Mangini went with Heckert and he can give his opinion.




While he can't get the job, he can certainly have a wink wink deal.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Quote:

Let's see...............A leads to B leads to C leads to D............

A) Heckert didn't care for having Mangini as the head coach of the Browns so he turned down the chance at the job

B) Holmgren's first choice for GM appears to be his old WCO buddy Heckert, so

C) Since Holmgren is now running the show and is doing things the way Heckert wants them done, verified by the fact Heckert is here, says that

D) Mangini better hope like Hell that Heckert doesn't get the gig





C is most interesting in the way your phrased it. Why would you think or feel that Holmgren, now running things, is going to run them the way Heckert wants them run as opposed to the way Holmgren wants them run? Is that phrasing just to support your position? Hmm?

It could just as easily be that Heckert wants to work with Holmgren and is willing to tolerate Mangini to get the opportunity to work with Holmgren again.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
J
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
J
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
Quote:

A) Heckert didn't care for having Mangini as the head coach of the Browns so he turned down the chance at the job

B) Holmgren's first choice for GM appears to be his old WCO buddy Heckert, so





just kinda throwing this out there, but maybe Heckert declining the job before didn't mean he didn't want to work with Mangini. Maybe he knew what the structure was going to be like (meaning he wouldn't have total say on personnel) and didn't want that. I don't recall ever reading anything he or Mangini said negative about each other.

Maybe he still won't like it, who knows he hasn't even interviewed yet. I am sure he won't be the only one interviewed as I seem to remember from Holmgren's interview in Seattle that he really liked the dude from GB (McKenzie? maybe).

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
here's what i don't get. heckert is the gm for the eagles now, right? so in order for him to leave, wouldn't he need a promotion? since he's interviewing for same position, that means he needs to have final say in order to be able to leave philadelphia (assuming philly doesn't just let him go which appears is the case). if that's the case, and holmgren already said he has final say, how can we get heckert? well...i guess i answered my own question. i guess only if philly lets him leave.

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
transcript is up

Quote:

(Browns General Counsel Fred Nance introduction)- “Good afternoon. It is indeed quite an honor as one of my first official acts as a part of the Cleveland Browns organization to have the opportunity to present to you our new President, Mike Holmgren. I’ve had the opportunity during the course of finalizing his contract to get to know Mike a bit and I have to tell you that all those reports are true. He is a man of vision, determination and most of all, integrity. His accomplishments speak for themselves. He really doesn’t need any introduction. That’s why it is such a thrill for me to say on behalf of the people of the City of Cleveland, Mike, on behalf of all of us who kept the faith and knew that a better day was coming for the Cleveland Browns, on behalf of Cleveland Browns fans all over this nation, indeed, all over the world, welcome Mike Holmgren.”

(Opening statement)- “I want you to know for the last 562 press conferences I’ve given, I didn’t wear a neck tie, so this is a new deal. Jim [Brown], good to see you. I look forward to getting to know all of you over the course of our time here. I know a few of you from my days as a coach. When I made the decision this year to evaluate how I would feel being away from the game after coaching for a long time, I realized I missed it a lot. Then, I had to make a decision, or we had to make a decision, whether I would stay on the field or attempt a new challenge. After much consideration, I thought that I would like to approach the NFL and a team in a different way, a new challenge if you will. Once that was done Randy Lerner approached us. We had some wonderful discussions and meetings and the rest as they say, is history. I’m very, very excited to be here. I’m excited about the possibilities of what we could do, understanding that any organization that has changed like this can expect some change. I’ve had the privilege and the pleasure of meeting a number of folks in the organization. Today is my first day. I still have a whole lot of folks to meet. We’re going to be making some decisions by the end of the week hopefully. Something that I thought could be done rather quickly, sometimes, there are a lot of rules in the NFL, as you know, as far as hiring people and we’re going to abide by those rules, teams are in playoffs, those types of considerations. It’s probably going to take a little bit longer then I had hoped, but [I am] looking forward to the challenge of, not necessarily rebuilding the Browns, because the Browns have a wonderful, wonderful history, but being a part of getting the team back to where they should be, and I’m talking about the playoffs and potentially the Super Bowl. That’s the goal of every organization in this business. My first head coaching job was in Green Bay and my second one was in Seattle and in both instances I think we did a good job of going in there and fixing things a little bit and eventually playing in the Super Bowl, which is the hope of every player and certainly of every person in the organization.


“One quick story, when we won the Super Bowl in Green Bay, it had been a long time, since Coach (Vince) Lombardi, that they had participated in the Super Bowl, much less win it. I remember it being in the Superdome in Louisiana. i was sitting in the coach’s room there, some of you know where that is, and there were a lot of happy folks in there. I asked them to leave for just a second so I could be by myself. I remember thinking, you could hear the players, the coaches, but there are so many more people that were enjoying that win. There are so many more people that make up an organization and deserve the credit for building something up and eventually playing in that game. We’re going to try very, very hard to get everybody pulling in the same direction and hopefully it’ll have a happy ending. Once again, I am very, very excited. Before I go any further, I would like to introduce my wife, Kathy. We had gotten rid of all our snow equipment when we left Green Bay, but you know what, it’s beautiful outside. It’s beautiful and we are very, very happy to be here, so thank you.”

(On if he can confirm that he met with Eric Mangini today and where he stands in terms of his decision on him)- “That’s an important question for the organization. I met with Eric briefly, but not ‘the’ meeting. He was busy. They’re getting their yearend evaluations completed. I saw a number of the coaches. We have a meeting scheduled for tomorrow. What I asked him to do is I asked him to think about a few things this evening. I didn’t want to really get any sort of answer or any feeling from him today, but I did give him a list of things to think about for our meeting tomorrow in fairness to Eric, instead of getting blindsided with a bunch of pop questions from me. I was a coach for a long time and it’s important that he understands where I’m coming from. It’s important that I understand where he’s coming from. The only way you win in this league is if the coach and the person in my position and or a general manager are absolutely on the same wave length. That’s the only way you have a chance. You’ve all seen organizations that you kind of scratch your head and [think], ‘Why doesn’t it work for them? They should be better or their record should be better or whatever.’ It boils down to, you can pinpoint it is that egos get in the way. Everyone establishes their little power base and it destroys the team. At least it doesn’t let them accomplish what they should accomplish. My goal is to have that feeling in this building, is to have everyone thinking in a like manner, going in the same direction. Let’s put all the egos aside for a second and let’s get around the job of winning. That meeting I’m going to have with him tomorrow.”

(On if Tom Heckert will be interviewed for the General Manager position)- “Tom is coming in tomorrow, yes.”

(On if he has other candidates lined up to interview for the General Manager position)- “Yes we do.”

(On if he can say who the other candidates for General Manager are)- “No I can’t. Thanks for asking though (joking).”

(On if Eric Mangini has a legitimate chance to win him over in their meeting tomorrow)- “Absolutely, otherwise I wouldn’t have set the meeting up. When you get to know me a little bit, and some of you in the room know me a little bit, I don’t dance too much and I appreciate people that will shoot straight, so I wouldn’t do that to him. We’re going to have a meeting and maybe a couple of meetings this week, but I hope to have that resolved by the end of the week.”

(On if he is working on a new contract for Joshua Cribbs and how soon it could be accomplished)- “Well that’s the question. We’ve been in contact with his representatives even when I was in Arizona. I believe players should be rewarded for what they do. I have no problems with that at all. What happens though on occasion is our view of how much that should be and the agent’s view of how much that should be differs. We have made an effort. We will continue to make an effort to handle Josh’s situation. I want Josh here. Now, he has three years left on his existing contract, so it’s a little unprecedented to start doing things this early in a contract like that. Having said that, a player should get what he deserves in my opinion and he’s been a fine player. It’s just that business part of it that we’re going through now. We’re trying and I hope how we do that is good enough.”

(On what he is inheriting here)- “They’ve one four games in a row. That’s pretty good. Now, Tom (Withers), you have to give me some time to take off my coaching hat. Now I’m a big shot executive (joking). What I have to do is I have to probably rearrange how I think about the team. Eric’s going to view it a certain way because he’s the coach. I’ve gone into situations and said probably words very close to that. You go in and take a program that’s been down a little bit, an organization, and you want to build it up. Sometimes frustration sets in. It doesn’t happen fast enough, guys get hurt, you were counting on this player and something happens and a coach’s frustration comes out. The team finished strong, they did. Again, there’s a lot more to how this is going to play out than the last four games.”

(On if his duties go beyond the football aspect of the organization)- “Everything, I sell suites, hotdogs, parking, the whole deal, yes, I get to do it (joking). Yes, I was a business major in college, the Harvard of the west. I went to USC, you know that. My responsibility is for the organization, so I’ll take an active role in everything. Now, one of the keys to that is, clearly, I’m not going to micromanage. I’m going to hire people, or we have good people in place and I’m going to oversee that, but yes, I’m going to take an active role in everything.”

(On what positions he wants to hire in the personnel department besides a general manager)- “That’s in the process of being decided right now and I would have a much better answer for you at the beginning of next week. I know that doesn’t help you much, but we have a number of things we’re looking at. We talked about change and some of that is just restructuring, in my opinion. Sometimes you know you have five people changing the light bulb. We’re going to look at everything and try and streamline things, get good people to do it and work hard and time it from there, but I will have a much better feel for that next week.”

(On if he can go through what he has done since he arrived last night and if Randy Lerner is here)- “The owner was going to be here, but he got trapped. He could not travel because of the weather, so I didn’t have a chance to meet with Randy. We were going to meet today. We will meet tomorrow. I don’t have an office yet so I just ran into the first one that was empty. They set me up pretty good and that’s what I’ve been doing. I’ve been talking to people, putting lists together of potential candidates for any number of things. [I am] trying to evaluate the organization now and how things are set up and learning, really, how things have been done here. If change is necessary, change will take place. If it’s not, it won’t. The other thing, as you would know, I have a stack of messages up there this high. Every guy I’ve ever coached with, played with, went to school with wants a job. I understand that so I am just trying to be fair with those types of things. That’s the kind of day it’s been so far.”

(On if he has contacted any head coaching candidates and if he has a list of candidates)- “That’s a little premature. Like I said, I am meeting with Eric tomorrow. Any list? If I spent a lot of time on a list, it might have been a lot of time wasted. Let’s see how this thing goes during the week. What I’ve always done in my position as a head coach in the league, I’ve always kept lists every year of position coaches, head coaches. I guess an honest answer to your question, I have lists. I have a lot of names. Now, will I ever have to go to that list, we’ll see.”

(On if he generally believes your record is what you are)- “If I understand what you are saying, I think so on one hand. On the other hand, I think over the course of a season, a young team can improve. You can see growth. You can see development. My third year in Seattle, we were 4-9 and having a bad year, I mean not playing very well. Then our quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got hot and he was just starting to feel it, starting to become a quarterback for us. Then, we won our last three games against playoff caliber teams, San Diego, Atlanta, one other team. We finished the season 7-9 and that was the spring board for what happened in the future and we eventually got to the Super Bowl. We were having a lousy season. The team was way better at the end of the year then it was at the beginning of the year and guys started coming. Shaun Alexander started learning what it was to be in the NFL, all of those things. Your record, that’s what it is. No question about it. Can you improve and can you kind of build on a tough record for the next year because of what happened at the end of the season? I think absolutely you can.”

(On what Mangini needs to present to him in order to stay with the Browns)- “Now Marty (Gitlin), you don’t really expect me to answer that question? I understand the question, but in fairness to everybody, let’s just let this play out. Like I said, hopefully by the end of the week I can make the call.”

(On if having the same coaching philosophies is important to being on the same page with a head coach)- “I think it’s a little bit of the same page. All I care about is for the organization to win and set it up properly. That’s what I want. If you play a 3-4 defense and I am a four man line guy or if you run the spread offense and I am a West Coast guy, I don’t care. I really don’t care. I always thought it was a little bit funny. I learned my trade, if you will, under Bill Walsh who got credit for the West Coast offense, but actually if you asked Bill about it, it was Paul Brown. It’s a term I always thought, with all due respect, I always thought it was a little bit of a lazy term that you guys use sometimes, with all due respect. I took what I learned, I go to wherever I go and I am doing my thing and adding this, adding that, adding that and while philosophically, you might make an argument for West Coast, it was different. Jon Gruden worked for me. Andy Reid worked for me. (Steve) Mariucci worked for. All of these guys, Mike Sherman. They all learned what we did, but then they go to their places and it changes. I think if you look at football, unless if you are running the Wildcat or one of those things that they are doing now, you see a lot of similarities in offense. I wouldn’t get too bogged down in that. I believe I can contribute a little to the offensive thinking. I’m not going to coach the team. I am not going to coach the team, but in the offseason and meetings, if someone wants to come in and talk football with me, I’d love that. I still enjoy that. I hope they do that, but I have a different gig now. I am not going to coach the football team. We will hire coaches to coach the football team.”

(On who will handle drafting and free agency)- “That also remains to be seen. Right now, I have a lot of titles. I could do it all if I wanted to. I don’t want to. I am going to hire a general manager. I know you guys know this, very few teams, none that I’ve been associated with, with high powered personnel people or presidents or whatever you want to call them, does the guy come in, pound the desk and say, ‘We are taking this guy and I don’t care what anybody thinks.’ There’s one team I can think of that does that, but no one else. If we have a general manager, and I will be involved, absolutely involved, but as to actually who says, ‘We are going to pick this guy on draft day,’? Right now, I couldn’t tell you.”

(On how much input a coach should have in drafting)- “A lot, I coached for 25 years. Absolutely it’s a mistake if whoever has that responsibility on draft day, does not listen to the assistant coaches and [head] coaches. The best example I can give you was, again, when we went to Green Bay and Ron Wolf was my boss. He ran the Packers. He hires me, a first-time head coach. He told me, ‘I will never give you a player you don’t want.’ I realized, he set up the board, but he involved me in everything. I think that’s the best way to do it. These little power groups or little kingdoms in any organization are not healthy. They are not healthy. Part of my job is to make sure that everyone feels that they can contribute and be listened to.”

(On how much he will miss coaching and if he could possibly coach again)- “I think I said I wasn’t going to coach this year. (joking) You know, I don’t know Scott (Petrak). I think maybe afterwards you can ask my wife what she’d rather have me do. I did it. It was so much fun. I enjoyed it. I miss it, and I know I’m going to miss it. I’ve never been one to look back that way. My challenge is to take my new role, help whoever the coach is be as successful as he can be, help him and understand that. I’m in a different place now. If I can feel good about how I’ve helped somebody that way, that’ll be enough for me.”

(On his feelings on his first day on the job)- “It’s invigorating. It’s fun. We had a blast our year off. I got to ride my motorcycle a little bit. We read a lot of books. We were with the grandkids. I mean it was a great year, something I needed. I teased my friends, (Bill) Parcells, (Dick) Vermeil, (John) Madden, all those guys, [after] about 10 years they took a break. They took a break and came back. I never did that. It was 17 years of [work] and I needed to take a break. I didn’t know what I was going to do when I came back. I didn’t know if I was going to get back into football when I left. Like I said, I realized I missed it. There’s something inside of me, the challenge of rebuilding things, it’s just what I like to do. I was a coach first and now I have a different role. I am invigorated. After talking to Randy Lerner, he was unbelievable with me, unbelievable. He so wants this team to be a great football team for the people of this city, the Browns fans all over the world and he challenged me. When you get that type of support from your owner, he kind of sealed the deal. I’m excited, we’re excited. Someone told me when I came it didn’t snow in Cleveland. In Green Bay, like I said, we’ve experienced a little snow and a little cold at one time or another. It’s going to be fun and exciting. We just roll up our sleeves in the next few weeks and months and do the best job we can of analyzing what we have, where we have to go. I pray all the time for wisdom and discernment, so we’ll see how it goes.”





theobr.com

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Quote:

This is not directed at you bro.

We seem to have a board full of Miss Cleo's around here acting like they know what's going to happen when in fact none of us know SQUAT.




I am 100% certain that there is a 70% chance that the odds of Mangini staying are 50-50


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Just poor wording on my part (or actually, it's just poor humor on yours ) but Heckert didn't want to come here because he didn't want to have a coach forced upon him, which was Mangini. Now that Holmgren is here and doing this his way, and since Heckert is now here, indicating he approves of the way Holmgren is doing things, then I'll say Mangini better not be looking at houses to buy.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

here's what i don't get. heckert is the gm for the eagles now, right? so in order for him to leave, wouldn't he need a promotion? since he's interviewing for same position, that means he needs to have final say in order to be able to leave philadelphia (assuming philly doesn't just let him go which appears is the case). if that's the case, and holmgren already said he has final say, how can we get heckert? well...i guess i answered my own question. i guess only if philly lets him leave.


The same way Kokinis had "final say" over the roster.

It's all grey-colored language in the contracts. If Heckert really wants to come to work with his buddy Holmgren, he'll agree to a "promotion" while checking with Mike before any deals are made.

There's the letter of the law, then there's practical application of the law.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Quote:

Just poor wording on my part (or actually, it's just poor humor on yours ) but Heckert didn't want to come here because he didn't want to have a coach forced upon him, which was Mangini. Now that Holmgren is here and doing this his way, and since Heckert is now here, indicating he approves of the way Holmgren is doing things, then I'll say Mangini better not be looking at houses to buy.




Hey, I'm damn funny, just ask me!

Somehow I don't think Holmgren is going to say in the presser that Mangini absolutely has a shot at the job if he's already sold on Heckert who's already not sold on gini. Holmgren doesn't come across to me as a guy who's going to string a guy along.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Nor is he going to appear to be knee-jerk or make a hasty decision.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
I dunno..........In today's NFL, not only do you have to win over the owner, but the fans and media as well.

If Holmgren came out and said "I don't really care if Mangini won the final four games or not, I'm relieving him of his duties" that would draw criticism from the fans and media, but if he makes it appear he's giving Mangini a truly fair shake, that would make him appear to be the benevolent leader.

It's possible Holmgren is going to give Mangini a fair crack, but if Holmgren isn't solidly already leaning one way or another, then we're screwed. The vast majority of people in his position would know what they are going to do.

So what do I think? I think this isn't Holmgren's first rodeo.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
If he makes it appear he's giving gini a fair shot and doesn't is going to make him a snake in the grass. My hopes for a Holmgren run organization just won't let me go there, not now at least.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015

A snake-in-the-grass? Why? Because he's smarter than Mangini who had no idea how to play the media, and thus got crucified for it?

That doesn't make Holmgren a creep. It makes him smart.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
I think we can all agree he's smarter than Mangini, especially when it comes to dealing with the media but if he's going to put out there Mangini has a shot, he has to actually give him a fair shot.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,044
i agree but the main thing was it was publicly stated by holmgren that he will have final say. i thought that'd throw a wrench but i guess it's not like anyone is looking to enforce it, especially if the eagles don't care.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

Quote:

A) Heckert didn't care for having Mangini as the head coach of the Browns so he turned down the chance at the job

B) Holmgren's first choice for GM appears to be his old WCO buddy Heckert, so





just kinda throwing this out there, but maybe Heckert declining the job before didn't mean he didn't want to work with Mangini. Maybe he knew what the structure was going to be like (meaning he wouldn't have total say on personnel) and didn't want that. I don't recall ever reading anything he or Mangini said negative about each other.






Heckert didn't like that a HC was hired before him,...and like you said,...too many rules were probably already in place.

E.O was right in stating that it appears that Holmgren wants to make sure that EM is willing to work within the confines of his overall authority.Play nice or don't play at all. The fact that MH is pretty much giving EM the answers to his test bodes well for Mangini. As far as Heckett goes,..he's going to fall under the same scrutiny as Mangini,...all 3 of these guys are probably going to sit down together before any final decisions are announced.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,711
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,711
Quote:

Let's see...............A leads to B leads to C leads to D............

A) Heckert didn't care for having Mangini as the head coach of the Browns so he turned down the chance at the job

B) Holmgren's first choice for GM appears to be his old WCO buddy Heckert, so

C) Since Holmgren is now running the show and is doing things the way Heckert wants them done, verified by the fact Heckert is here, says that

D) Mangini better hope like Hell that Heckert doesn't get the gig






i get what your saying, but it could be something else entirely...

heckert had no intention of being a dead beat gm....lets face it lerner did it wrong last year....lerner did it right this time....

president.....check....
gm....next on list...picked by MH
coach....picked by MH and GM

its very possible that heckert would be ok with mangini the coach...but not mangini the coach with power over the roster.

basically he withdrew his name because it was all done wrong.....dysfunctional so to speak...

MH isn't gonna make the same mistake....


Attitude is everything....FEAR THE ELF!!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Suuuuuuuuuure.......Go ahead, Elf..................play fair

Ok, now being absolutely unbiased here, while I believe it doesn't make sense to keep 'Gini if I'm Holmgren (which would be a different opinion if Holmgren wasn't here) it's very possible that Heckert just didn't want to have Mangini forced upon him, even though he may have nothing against 'Gini.

Now if I were a GM, I wouldn't even come into a situation where a guy like Mangini was still involved. I think the fact he even agreed to show up and interview says the odds of Mangini staying are remote.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Maybe this is already in one of these threads and maybe not. Frankly, it doesn't matter as the talk is, predictably, all over the board in multiple-places anyway............

This is from Ridenour.........

Quote:

BEREA, Ohio _ After months of springing pop quizzes on his players, the table was turned on Browns coach Eric Mangini on Tuesday.

New president Mike Holmgren gave Mangini homework for the discussion that will decide Mangini's future in Cleveland by the end of this week.

In his first day on the job, Holmgren said he spoke to Mangini briefly, but it wasn't "THE meeting."

That will come on Wednesday, when Holmgren said he will also interview Philadelphia Eagles General Manager Tom Heckert for the position vacant since George Kokinis was ousted on Nov. 2.

The Browns received permission from the Eagles to talk to Heckert during an open window for interviews of those with playoff teams, but he cannot be hired until the Eagles are eliminated from the postseason. The Eagles visit the Dallas Cowboys on Saturday.

The Browns must also interview a minority candidate to fulfill the league's Rooney Rule.

Heckert's father, Tom Sr., is a Youngstown native who received his master's from Kent State and was a scout for the Browns from 1982-86. The younger Heckert, 42, does not have total control of the 53-man roster, with Eagles coach Andy Reid serving as president of football operations. Heckert was a candidate in Cleveland last year, but took himself out of the running when Mangini was hired on Jan. 8.

Holmgren said he had other GM candidates in mind, but would not divulge them.

Holmgren gave Mangini his agenda for Wednesday's talk because he said he didn't want to blindside him with questions. In his first season, Mangini guided the Browns to a 5-11 record, finishing with four consecutive victories, accomplished by a 1-11 team for only the second time in league history since it went to a 16-game schedule in 1978.

"I gave him a list of things to think about before our meeting tomorrow," Holmgren said. "It's important that he understands where I'm coming from. It's important I understand where he's coming from. The only way you win in this league is if the coach and the person in my position or general manager are on the same wavelength.

"You've all seen organizations that you kind of scratch your head and say why doesn't it work for them? Their record should be better. What it boils down to is that egos get in the way. Everyone establishes their little power base and it destroys the team. Or at least it doesn't let them accomplish what they should accomplish. My goal is to have that feeling in this building. To have everyone thinking in a like manner, going in the same direction. Let's put all the egos aside and let's get around to the job of winning. That's the meeting I'm going to have with (Mangini) tomorrow."

Holmgren said he will give Mangini a chance to win him over, otherwise he wouldn't have set up the meeting.

"When you get to know me a little bit, I don't dance too much," Holmgren said. "And I appreciate people that will shoot straight and I wouldn't do that to him. We're going to have a meeting and maybe a couple of meetings this week. But I hope to have that resolved by the end of the week."

Holmgren has not contacted any other coaching candidates, saying that would be premature and perhaps a waste of time. But he confessed he's a compulsive list-keeper.

"I've always kept lists, every year, of position coaches, head coaches," he said. "So I have a lot of names. Will I ever have to go to that list? We'll see."

Although he appreciated the Browns' strong finish, Holmgren said, "There's a lot more to how this is going to play out than the last four games."

Holmgren downplayed the notion that Mangini must agree to run the West Coast offense and a 4-3 defense, which Holmgren used during his 17 years as coach of the Green Bay Packers and Seattle Seahawks.

"All I care about is for the organization to win and (to) set it up properly," Holmgren said. "If you play a 3-4 defense and I'm a four-man line guy, or if you run a spread offense and I'm a West Coast guy, I don't care.

"Jon Gruden worked for me. Steve Mariucci worked for me. Andy Reid worked for me. They all learned what we did and went to their places and made changes. So I wouldn't get too bogged down in that. I believe I can contribute a little to the offensive thinking. But I have a different gig now. I am not going to coach the football team. We'll hire coaches to coach the football team."






***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Some insight and coaching potentials from NFL Network's La Canfora and Wyche

http://www.nfl.com/videos/cleveland-browns/09000d5d81588bdf/Latest-from-Cleveland


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Quote:

In my best Sherlock Holmes fashion I have deducted a lot from Holmgren's presser.




That's the difference between your post and many of the others. Your giving your opinion, while many others are spouting off their opinions as facts.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Quote:

It could just as easily be that Heckert wants to work with Holmgren and is willing to tolerate Mangini to get the opportunity to work with Holmgren again.




OR it's possible that Heck's not wanting the job before had ZERO to do with Eric, and everybody is grasping at straws.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Quote:

Quote:

It could just as easily be that Heckert wants to work with Holmgren and is willing to tolerate Mangini to get the opportunity to work with Holmgren again.




OR it's possible that Heck's not wanting the job before had ZERO to do with Eric, and everybody is grasping at straws.




OR it was Mrs. Peacock in the sitting room with a knitting needle.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Correct, so what I mean about none of us knowing SQUAT


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
Quote:

That’s why it is such a thrill for me to say on behalf of the people of the City of Cleveland, Mike, on behalf of all of us who kept the faith and knew that a better day was coming for the Cleveland Browns, on behalf of Cleveland Browns fans all over this nation, indeed, all over the world, welcome Mike Holmgren.”





What an interview, We wanted integrity, honesty, direct answer guy , well we got one, I was thrown away after listening to Mike, very impressed, I'm hopeing in the future I can be just as impressed with his work, I'm not gonna worry myself who's the coach, I think Mike will hire someone to do a excellent job, no more blind leading the blind, we now have a guy with eye's wide open a guy with vision....

Being a little old timer, that statement about the City of Cleveland & the Browns, shakes my emotions, Growning up seeing & getting to come to Cleveland seeing a wonderful beautiful city was aways a thrill, I've loved the city of Cleveland since I was a boy, still do, she holds a special place, and the Browns...Well everybody knows there are three things ya dont make fun of, God, Family & the Browns, not always in that order...

Yes it will take time, but I'm gonna sit back and watch it all come together

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,961
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,961
Quote:

We seem to have a board full of Miss Cleo's around here acting like they know what's going to happen when in fact none of us know SQUAT.




How do you know that,,, do you have a link?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,711
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,711
well i can't argue with that...everyone always wants there own guys...and for that reason alone he might be gone.

plus it establishes the power structure...everyone knows where they stand...maybe that gets muddy with mangini staying....glad i don't have to figure it out...

what kills me is the constant turnover...even cinci figured that out...

our playbooks never get thick, so to speak....i want some stablility, and continuity...now i know its only 1 year...and if MH gets it right we'll be on our way, but i have to say i like the 3-4 and think ryan is a great d coordinator...

and the discipline that mangini instilled is paying off....

i guess it comes down to 'who is eric mangini?'

is he a bullheaded ego manic?
does he stuggle with delegating tasks?
does he micro-manage because of it?

the first makes him power hungry....the 2nd and 3rd, make him unable to trust someone else to do the job...

what makes him tick, so to speak....these are the types of things MH has to figure out....and its possible that its not worth the headache....

mangini might just be the type of guy that will listen to others and then do what he wants anyway...because he thinks he's the smartest football mind in the organization. It it might have been true, until MH showed up....now it might be an opportunity to learn...

who knows..


Attitude is everything....FEAR THE ELF!!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
New president Mike Holmgren gave Mangini homework for the discussion that will decide Mangini's future in Cleveland by the end of this week.

"I gave him a list of things to think about before our meeting tomorrow," Holmgren said. "It's important that he understands where I'm coming from. It's important I understand where he's coming from. The only way you win in this league is if the coach and the person in my position or general manager are on the same wavelength.

"You've all seen organizations that you kind of scratch your head and say why doesn't it work for them? Their record should be better. What it boils down to is that egos get in the way. Everyone establishes their little power base and it destroys the team. Or at least it doesn't let them accomplish what they should accomplish





Most in here haven't thought what that homework entails..what was happening at the start..how and what happened to EM and Kokopuffs?
Who made the decisions to get certain players..why didn't the GM know anything about the Edwards trade?..Things like that will have to be answered..
Things a lot of people in here want to bypass..

No one can deny all the moves after he was hired had his handprint on everything...and I'm sure MH is going to ask him about how he got along with others in the building and who was doing what..who's ego was off the hook and who's wasn't..
What type of players does he think can make this team stronger and the like..all of that and more..


Holmgren said he will give Mangini a chance to win him over, otherwise he wouldn't have set up the meeting.


Oh but Manpolen said he didn't have to sell himself...

Last edited by Attack Dawg; 01/06/10 09:38 AM.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:

Most in here haven't thought what that homework entails..
...what was happening at the start
..how and what happened to EM and Kokopuffs?
...Who made the decisions to get certain players
..why didn't the GM know anything about the Edwards trade?
...Things like that will have to be answered..

Things a lot of people in here want to bypass..

No one can deny all the moves after he was hired had his handprint on everything...and I'm sure MH is going to ask him about how he got along with others in the building and who was doing what..who's ego was off the hook and who's wasn't..





Tacker...these are but a few of the questions Holmgren might have for Mangini. The fact that Holmgren gave him the questions ahead of time might be an indication Holmgren has done his homework and may already know the answers to his questions.

Listening to Mike and Mike this morning, one of them said one of the questions Mangini might get is, WHY WERE YOU FIRED IN NY?

One of the Mikes commented..."you think Holmgren called Brett Favre concerning what happened to Mangini in NY?"

My guess would be, if Mangini doesn't answer Holmgren's questions with complete honesty, to the degree of being critical of himself over mistakes he has made...he could be done in Cleveland.

Mangini is not going to be able to BS Holmgren.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
Just Clicking....

First to Eotab...

I didn't see him view the local press as small time nobodies.......I saw him making mental notes concerning their names. Even when they clearly stated their names and media outlet.....he made them repeat it and then immediately used their name in the response...That is classic memorization techniques....

Next to Toad....
Concerning Heckert....I won't speculate on what it means for Mangini...But as for the reasons he decided to not take the position last time and why he might be willing this time.....First...I want to say that I think you are probably right...But something just popped into my head and I thought I might just play devil's advocate here....Could it be that Heckert had a HC in mind last year and as you mention did not want a HC forced upon him....and this year that HC is not available????

I mean I am just thinking in a manner where Mangini is not even a part of the equation...that it could have been ANY person hired as HC.


I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...

What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
Quote:

Listening to Mike and Mike this morning, one of them said one of the questions Mangini might get is, WHY WERE YOU FIRED IN NY?


That is an easy answer...and frankly it has nothing to do with Mangini's qualifications whether you think he is a good coach or a bad coach....lol...The NY Jets FO and Ownership were stupid and thought they were going to lure the great and star studded Bill Cowher. But in order to do so they had to fire Mangini first to have an open position to land him to.....


I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...

What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Holmgren airs at 4 O'Clock

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5