|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,440
Dawg Talker
|
OP
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,440 |
Child directs airplanes over radio transmissions at JFK airport
Updated: Wednesday, 03 Mar 2010, 9:25 AM EST Published : Tuesday, 02 Mar 2010, 10:17 PM EST
* Ted Daniel
Ted Daniel Reporter
(FOX 25, myfoxboston.com) - The voice is unmistakably a child's giving the all-clear to a pilot from the air-traffic control tower at one of the nation's busiest airports.
Harmless? Or a problem? I think this is one of those stories where people can form their own opinion.
The FAA is certainly taking the matter seriously.
They have confirmed for FOX 25 that the recording we have with a child directing airplanes is an authentic recording from the JFK tower and an investigation is now underway.
The child makes five transmissions and the pilots respond enthusiastically to him.
JFK TOWER: Jet Blue 171 contact departure
PILOT: Over to departure jet blue 171, awesome job.
The child appears to be supervised as a controller explains the reason for the young voice.
JFK TOWER: That's what you get guys when the kids are out of school. (laugh)
As stressful as it can be for an air traffic controller a little bit of levity can go along way.
But Jim Baker,a retired chief pilot at Delta airlines with forty years of experience, says lives hang on every transmission and this raises safety concerns.
“I have never ever heard a small kid in the tower giving instructions for an airplane to take off or cross a runway or any kind of instructions” says Baker.
JFK is the 6th busiest airport in the country with thousands of planes taking off and landing every day.
The control tower is a highly secure area and the FAA says only licensed controllers are supposed to communicate with planes.
“I am sure the controller is a tremendous controller not a wise move, not a wise move...not in this day and age.”
In a statement released to FOX 25 the FAA says:
" Pending the outcome of our investigation, the employees involved in this incident are not controlling air traffic. This behavior is not acceptable and does not demonstrate the kind of professionalism expected from all FAA employees."
The union that represents air traffic controllers released this statement to us this evening.
" We do not condone this type of behavior in any way, and it is not indicative of the highest professional standards that controllers set for themselves and exceed each and every day in the advancement of aviation safety”.
No word on how long the FAA investigation is expected to take.
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK BELOW. Was this harmless or a problem?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
Reprimand them and move on.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
Oh for goodness sake, let them have a little fun. I used to let my son drive the tower crane when he was little. 
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,681
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,681 |
Quote:
Reprimand them and move on.
I agree....more like a verbal reprimand.
We need to quit acting like everything is the Strategic Air Command.
Just some interested kid wanting to do something cool.
It didn't sound like the pilot of the flight in question had a problem....he compliments the kid....sounds like he thought it was pretty cool as well.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,440
Dawg Talker
|
OP
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,440 |
When I read the story I didn't really see the big deal. I put it here to see what others thought.
People have been taking their kids to work for years. I'm sure the kid was being told exactly what to say and they were still performing the duties they were supposed to be doing.
This really seems like a non story to me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
But LIVES are at stake on that plane Peen... there are children on those planes, there are children in the houses around the airport, there are children without healthcare at the YMCA... we can't allow this kind of shenanigans or children could get hurt...  we have to think of the children... don't you get it Peen, scooter helmets, car booster seats, bed rails, air traffic controllers, no taking peanut butter to school, removing diving boards from the community pool, its to protect the children... and shouldn't we all be willing to suffer if it keeps just one innocent child from getting hurt? 
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850 |
Quote:
no taking peanut butter to school
wait a second there. i thought we shipped off all the kids with peanut allergies to Alaska? 
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 683
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 683 |
NRTU,
I agree with those saying leave the guy alone, it's not that big a deal. Sure, maybe not the best idea, but at least the guy is taking an interest in his kids (presumably his kid), there are a lot of parents who would do well to do something like that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,224
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,224 |
Wow, he was supervised by someone and told what to say. I agree with the verbal reprimand idea.
There are no sacred cows.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,246
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,246 |
Quote:
I'm sure the kid was being told exactly what to say and they were still performing the duties they were supposed to be doing.
Bingo.
And it is not as if he was calling planes in for landing. Directing a plane to a runway has to be as mundane as directing someone to the bathroom.
And kids are more tech savvy than adults. Give him a day or two there and he'll run the show!
If it was a 911 call center that would be completely different.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248 |
This is a complete non-story. The kid was supervised and was doing trivial tasks. If any sort of major issue came to pass, The regular employee would of taken back over. Good gawd, are we THIS uptight as a society? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405 |
Its one of those were you say, but what if something DID happen? Chances may have been small, but they weren't zero. Would we all not be saying what a bunch of morons if something went a muck? Given a choice of a kid or a real ATC giving the instructions to the plane I was on, I'd take the trained ATC. Agree on the verbal reprimand, but you know someone in congress is going to chime in on this and form a commission. It'll end up with a solution tied to a stimulus bill and Al Gore might even blame it on global warming. 
"My signature line goes here."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,224
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,224 |
Quote:
Good gawd, are we THIS uptight as a society?
I think it's more of a media sensationalist, fear-inducing, aspect than anything. They're trying to make a non-story into something worse than it actually is. They lead you on to believe, through the headline, that this kid had either A.) hijacked a radio frequency and was guiding planes in to land, or B.) was guiding in planes with the consent of an adult. Either way it's a total hyperbole of what actually happened.
There are no sacred cows.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248 |
Quote:
Its one of those were you say, but what if something DID happen?
Then the kid would of been pushed aside and the regular employee would of taken over. This is the equivlent of inviting your kid over to the firehouse to washdown the fire engines and ambulances (part of the mundane work of being a fireworker) ... yet the media freaking out as if the kid was driving the ambulance himself during an emergency call. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,374
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,374 |
Quote:
Quote:
Good gawd, are we THIS uptight as a society?
I think it's more of a media sensationalist, fear-inducing, aspect than anything. They're trying to make a non-story into something worse than it actually is. They lead you on to believe, through the headline, that this kid had either A.) hijacked a radio frequency and was guiding planes in to land, or B.) was guiding in planes with the consent of an adult. Either way it's a total hyperbole of what actually happened.
I agree, But I still think someone's ass will be hung out to dry on this one!!!!
LET'S GO BROWNS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/OldSixty-Two/new0400001.jpg) [b]WOOF WOOF[b]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 |
I agree with Peen here. A verbal reprimand is appropriate and move on.
KeysDawg
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. - Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405 |
When the union head says, " We do not condone this type of behavior in any way, and it is not indicative of the highest professional standards that controllers set for themselves and exceed each and every day in the advancement of aviation safety”, it adds a little more to it than media sensationalism.
Would you agree it was bad judgment on the ATC's part?
"My signature line goes here."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
Let me answer your questions in reverse order... Quote:
Would you agree it was bad judgment on the ATC's part?
From the standpoint that everything in the world in 2010 is taped and he should have foreseen this getting out... yea, it was bad judgment... from the standpoint that somebody was actually going to get hurt... no, it wasn't bad judgment.
Quote:
When the union head says, " We do not condone this type of behavior in any way, and it is not indicative of the highest professional standards that controllers set for themselves and exceed each and every day in the advancement of aviation safety”, it adds a little more to it than media sensationalism.
That's what he has to say, just like Tiger has to say he's sorry and A-rod has to say he's sorry and people in politics have to act with righteous indignation every time one of them gets caught... would this blow over or blow up if he came on and said the truth, "The guy was just having fun with his kid, nobody was in any danger, y'all need to find some real news to report on." which is what he SHOULD have said, but then he'd get fired too and there would definitely be an investigation.... oddly enough, the only people that are never investigated simply for doing stupid stuff and being idiots... are congress. 
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831 |
Non-story IMO. The kid was probably sitting right next to his dad being told exactly what to say. If something happened where there was an emergency, the adult would've taken over. It's not like the kid was guiding a plane down for an emergency landing or something.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960 |
I didn't read this article but I did see the report on the Today show this morning.
Look, it was probably not the brightest of ideas given the sensitve nature of airports, flying, terrorism etc etc.. that sits heavy in the air today..
But in the Grand Scheme of things,, what's the big deal?
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
Media makes it a bigger story Quote:
WASHINGTON — For the third time in seven months, the judgment of those who operate the nation's air traffic control system has been called into question and raised concerns that the system may not be as safe as officials claim.
While major air crashes have declined sharply over the last decade, thanks largely to improved technology, aviation safety experts say they are seeing signs that complacency may be causing controllers and their supervisors to bend rules and relax their vigilance.
The latest incident was reported this week: A controller twice brought a child to work at the control tower at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, one of the nation's busiest airports, and allowed the child to radio instructions to pilots. The Federal Aviation Administration said Wednesday the controller and his supervisor have been suspended pending an investigation of the incident last month.
The problem extends to airline pilots as well. In several recent accidents — the crash of a regional airliner in upstate New York a year ago that killed 50 people is one example — pilots broke a cardinal safety rule prohibiting nonessential conversation during landing approaches.
"The hair is beginning to stand up on the back of our necks a little bit," said Jack Casey, an aviation safety consultant and former airline pilot. "When you get complacency, you run a higher risk of having an accident."
Other recent incidents:
_In October, several controllers handed off responsibility for a Northwest Airlines jet without alerting the next controller that they had been unable to make radio contact with the plane. Supervisors also failed to follow procedures for alerting a national security communications network to the problem. As a result, the Airbus A320 carrying 144 passengers was out of radio contact for 69 minutes before the security network was alerted. Rules put in place after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks are supposed to trigger an alert when a plane can't be raised by radio for 10 minutes.
_Last August, an air traffic controller at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey who handed off a private plane to controllers at a neighboring airport failed to correct the plane's pilot when he read back the wrong radio frequency. Controllers at both airports later tried unsuccessfully to reach the pilot. The plane collided moments later with a tour helicopter over the Hudson River. Three people in the plane and six in the helicopter were killed. The Teterboro controller was chitchatting on the phone with a female friend until seconds before the collision. The controller's supervisor had left the airport to run a personal errand.
The incidents suggest a casualness about rules that undermines safety, said Carol Carmody, a former National Transportation Safety Board member and former FAA official.
"If they don't follow fairly rigid procedures, they're going to make mistakes," Carmody said. "If you are in the safety business, you make a big deal out of anything like this because random events cause accidents."
Even more serious is that the controllers in the Teterboro and Kennedy incidents appear to have felt free to break rules, which suggests supervisors tolerated such lapses, said Michael Barr, who teaches aviation safety at the University of Southern California.
FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown said the incidents were "isolated occurrences" and not indicative of a broader safety problem.
"The unfortunate behavior of a few individuals doesn't reflect the true caliber of our work force," she said.
The FAA is implementing a new program that encourages air traffic controllers to report safety problems, including their own mistakes, so that the agency can spot trends and act to prevent future problems, Brown said. To encourage reporting, controllers aren't punished for errors they identify.
The agency has had a similar program for pilots for nearly a decade.
FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt, in speeches and congressional testimony, has called on pilots and air traffic controllers to create a professional atmosphere in cockpits and radar facilities and not to tolerate rule-breaking by colleagues.
The NTSB is concerned enough about the situation that it has scheduled a forum this spring on pilot and air traffic controller professionalism.
In a statement responding to the Kennedy incident, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association — the union that represents controllers — said it doesn't "condone this type of behavior in any way."
But Mary Schiavo, a former Transportation Department inspector general who has filed a lawsuit against the FAA on behalf of the families of five Italian tourists killed in the Hudson River collision, said there needs to be a strong message sent from the top. She suggested Babbitt and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood call "an all-hands-on-deck meeting and make sure air traffic controllers know it's every rule every time." http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20100304/US.Air.Traffic.Controllers/
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149 |
Quote:
Quote:
no taking peanut butter to school
wait a second there. i thought we shipped off all the kids with peanut allergies to Alaska?
Nope, they still live two doors down from me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960 |
Now we come to find that it happened again.. The same dad that brought his son in reportedly brought his daughter in the very next day..
OK, the guy is an idiot,, No question in my mind.. and maybe he should be suspended for a time..
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431 |
Would a heart surgeon bringing his kid into the operating room and letting him stitch up the heart ( all while being closely supervised of course ) be awarded the same lattitude ? Just curious .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850 |
Quote:
Would a heart surgeon bringing his kid into the operating room and letting him stitch up the heart ( all while being closely supervised of course ) be awarded the same lattitude ? Just curious .
it's not equivalent to stitching up the heart. it's equivalent to letting the kid tell the patient afterwards that everything went fine in surgery.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960 |
Quote:
Would a heart surgeon bringing his kid into the operating room and letting him stitch up the heart ( all while being closely supervised of course ) be awarded the same lattitude ? Just curious .
Aww Come On already,,,
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431 |
If that is your opinion . The guy obviously has a problem with following the rules . I'm not an air traffic controller but I would think that allowing children in the tower let alone on the air would be a big no no . Speaking just for me but when I am in the air flying around with hundreds of other planes I want the guys in the tower to do the job they are paid very well to do to get that job done with as little distractions as possible . Kids in the control tower lighten the mood ? I'd wager it did and the guys and girls working there probably got a kick out of it but wrong is wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
I've been in a control center, and I've been in a cockpit listening, and neither is as harried environment as many think. Both are in control, and both know where they are are and what's around them at all times, not like pilots are flying blind without the controllers instructions.
Like driving a car, most of the time, you don't need outside instructions, but when you reach and intersection, you follow the protocol of the traffic devices, and that's basically what the controller do, is direct the aircraft and give them their position in the order of things when they near their destination, otherwise, the pilots have basic rules they follow.
A 3 second radio message during a routine procedure isn't going to cause a catastrophe, and I would doubt the guy would have let his kid even on the radio if his board was full. He was probably nearing the end of his shift, or preparing for break, and it was the last flight on his board.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431 |
Protocol was not followed ..period . There are reasons that rules are put in place and even though some are stupid they are still in place . When I was in the Army we had so many stupid protocols to follow that it was mind numbing yet we still had to follow them . If nothing else the guy should be fired for failing to realize just what a collosal breach in that protocol he was committing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
You ALWAYS follow protocol and never make a mistake?
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431 |
Quote:
You ALWAYS follow protocol and never make a mistake?
Hardly , but I always knew that when I did that "justice" would be swift and immediate and in all likelihood out of all proportion with the crime .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,246
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,246 |
I would like to know why people equate this with a life saving procedure such as surgery or handling 911 calls as I have heard people liken it to?
In other words, Do you REALLY believe that your life is in that much jeopardy taxing on a runway? I can't remember the last time I read a story about planes colliding on the ground taxiing and it caused injury or a fatality.
If the kid was calling in planes to land, or communicating with them in the air then yes, I can see the analogy. Otherwise I don't buy it. You are more in jeopardy driving a car than taxiing on a runway.
Is Dad stupid? Yes. Is it as bad as some make it out to be? No I don't think so. Would I want to be flying with kids relaying messages to pilots? No Did he put lives in danger? I HIGHLY doubt it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,374
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,374 |
I'll refresh your memory about planes having problems with taxing down the runway ......On 3-27-77 2 747's collided on a runway in the Canary Islands, 583 dead....the worst airline disaster ever,of course technology was not the same 33 years ago, back then they relied heavily on radio transmissions, and a whole bunch of other factors played a part in that disaster. I'll digress too my earlier post....someones ass is going out to dry for that fiasco.
LET'S GO BROWNS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/OldSixty-Two/new0400001.jpg) [b]WOOF WOOF[b]
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Child directs airplanes over radio
transmissions at JFK airport
|
|