Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,865
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,865
Quote:

Holmgren says Cleveland Browns will definitely draft a QB, but probably not in the first couple of rounds
By Tony Grossi, The Plain Dealer
March 21, 2010, 5:37PM

ORLANDO, Fla. -- With 12 picks in the April 22-24 NFL draft -- their most since 2000 -- the Browns can go in a number of directions in the first year of the Mike Holmgren-Tom Heckert era.

There is no mystery about one thing. They will draft a quarterback. The president of the team is not shy about saying so.

"It's just something we have to do," Holmgren said as he embarked on his first NFL owners meetings as president of the Browns. "Why wait? I'm 61. I don't want to wait for anyone. We're going to have to do this."

Holmgren has stated several times his belief that the NFL is, more than ever, a quarterback-driven league and that the quarterback is the most important player in the organization. He already has overhauled the team's quarterback roster by bringing in Jake Delhomme and Seneca Wallace and parting ways with Brady Quinn and Derek Anderson.

But he knows the Browns aren't going anywhere, aren't turning the corner, until they find a young franchise quarterback.

"I think Jake will make us better right away. But we have to find the next guy. That's what we have to do," he said.

Holmgren likes Sam Bradford of Oklahoma, but believes St. Louis will make him the No. 1 pick of the draft. Although he said he would consider trading up for Bradford, he knows it's not realistic.

As for the second-ranked quarterback in the draft, Jimmy Clausen of Notre Dame, Holmgren was characteristically honest.

"I wish I liked him more," he said. "You know how you have a type of player that you like? It's not scientific. People like him a lot. He'll go high. But it would be hard for me [to take him]."

Holmgren does like Tim Tebow of Florida, despite reservations about his throwing mechanics, and has invited him to a future private visit. He intends to do that with "four or five" quarterbacks before the draft.

"But, here's the dilemma," he said. "There are areas of the football team that we really have to help -- the secondary, offensive line -- to get the team better. This year it would be pretty hard to use the second [round] pick to get a quarterback. It would be pretty hard for me.

"Next year might be easier. We've got [three picks in the third round and four in the fifth round] going for us. But I'd have to have another second-round pick [to take a quarterback in the second round]."

So more than likely, Holmgren will scour the passers in the next rung after Bradford and Clausen and choose one anytime after the Browns' first two picks. A trade-up into the mid- to low-second round is possible.

Considering his reputation as a quarterback guru, it might surprise some to know that in 17 seasons as a head coach in Green Bay and Seattle, Holmgren never drafted a quarterback in the first or second round.

In Green Bay, Holmgren had the benefit of coaching the sport's all-time QB iron man, Brett Favre. In seven years, Favre never missed a game and took the Packers to two Super Bowls and a regular-season record of 84-42. But Holmgren was always on the lookout for young quarterbacks. He and General Manager Ron Wolf drafted a quarterback six times in Holmgren's seven seasons.

"We were [always] drafting later," Holmgren said. "Usually if it's a franchise quarterback, you're going to have to make that decision in the first 10 picks, probably, to get the guy you really covet. Once you're not drafting up in there, unless you're willing to trade to get up in there, you have to kind of look at it differently.

"What we did was say, 'OK, we're going to draft later. Let's do our homework and if we see a guy we like and we think we can develop, take him.' And it worked pretty well."

Three of the six quarterbacks Wolf and Holmgren drafted went on to be long-time starters with other teams -- Ty Detmer (ninth round), Mark Brunell (fifth) and Matt Hasselbeck (sixth).

When Holmgren left Green Bay to be Seattle's coach and general manager, he later traded for Hasselbeck.

Holmgren's record choosing quarterbacks in Seattle was not as good. He drafted one in four of his first five seasons in Seattle. None became a starter and the only one still playing is Wallace, now with the Browns.

He is a former coach who believes taking a flier on a quarterback in the sixth round is more prudent than drafting a player destined for a career on special teams.

"Why not?" Holmgren said. "I haven't talked to Heckert about it specifically. But I think it's a good idea. Certainly this year. We've got 12 picks. Goodness gracious, if we don't pop early, why not? So let's do our research.

"If we don't get the guy we decide we really want, now we go to Plan B and try to get the next guy we try to develop. If you believe that [a player has potential], we take him. If he doesn't get there, we do the same thing next year. The same thing in two years. But we keep doing it."

Unless something unexpected happens, the Browns probably won't find their franchise quarterback in this draft. But it won't be from lack of trying.

© 2010 cleveland.com. All rights reserved.





New article, but not much new info

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2010/03/holmgren_says_cleveland_browns.html


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

As for the second-ranked quarterback in the draft, Jimmy Clausen of Notre Dame, Holmgren was characteristically honest.

"I wish I liked him more," he said. "You know how you have a type of player that you like? It's not scientific. People like him a lot. He'll go high. But it would be hard for me [to take him]."




The PC way of saying he's not a franchise QB. Very much happy to hear Holmgren say that.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
J
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
J
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
Interesting read, not much different then what most on here thought but at least he isn't shy about it.

Thx Daman.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Insert Zac Robinson.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

Insert Dan LeFevour or Mike Kafka





Thankfully, I fixed that for you.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Good read.

I'm going to mention someone that almost no one is talking about. I think that Jarrett Brown of West Virginia is someone Holmgren might take a look at. I need to watch a lot more of him, but I think he has a lot of potential, especially in a WCO.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
J
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
J
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
I am not a scouting person, but I do get to watch a lot of WVU games. He is pretty raw, but he does have a canon for an arm. I am with you on thinking he has potential to be good in the WCO, just might take a few years.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
i was looking at him too, but don't know much about him other than reading aobut him in different draft magazines


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,136
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,136
Quote:

"Why wait? I'm 61. I don't want to wait for anyone. We're going to have to do this."





I don't know why, but laughed my arse off when I read that.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Good read, Nice to see something that doesn't involve Ham.


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Sounds like his strategy will be to work on the dbs and OL and take a flyer on a developmental QB every year until he strikes pay dirt.

yesss

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
we are drafting 2 S's and atleast one corner


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,865
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,865
Quote:

The PC way of saying he's not a franchise QB. Very much happy to hear Holmgren say that.





The moment I finished reading what Holmgren thought of Clausen, I thought,,,, SMOKESCREEN...

don't have a clue if I'm right or wrong, but that was my first thought..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Insert that quarterback from the Cincinnati Bearcats, If he falls far enough.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
J
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
J
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
oh wow I hope not, but you could be right. For what ever reason I don't get that kinda feeling with MH tho. *shrug*

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

Quote:

The PC way of saying he's not a franchise QB. Very much happy to hear Holmgren say that.





The moment I finished reading what Holmgren thought of Clausen, I thought,,,, SMOKESCREEN...

don't have a clue if I'm right or wrong, but that was my first thought..




I doubt it.

A smokescreen would indicate interest, not denying interest. At least an effective one would.

Why would we smokescreen that the Browns don't like Clausen? To prevent a trade up for him...because I'm pretty sure that isn't going to happen.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
While I thought Pike had a good career at Cinci, to me he is a stick figure. He had injuries in college and I doubt he could take an NFL beating.

That being said, I have to remind myself that Holmgren has set us up to draft someone to develop into a starter. If Pike can get bigger and improve as a third QB, I would like the move.

Say what you want about Delhomme and Wallace, but with them here we have the luxury of developing a young guy, and not forcing him in too early. If they draft a QB in the later rounds every year, which seems to be his MO, we could eventually end up with a guy to lead us for years. Wow, imagine what that would be like.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
My buddy is a huge Bearcats fan and he said that Pike is nothing more than a product of the system.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
You just might be right. The back up Collaros is from my home town, and led the team just as effectively. I actually think he got screwed when Pike came back. They let him drive the team down the field, then let Pike come in to throw the TD.


I would take LeFevour over PIke in a minute. Robinson and the WVU QB are also decent project guys.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
M
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
M
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
It'll be interesting to see how much of this is true and how much is bull. Frankness could be frankness or it could be a diversion.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"One man's Bum is another man's Hobo" - Waterdawg
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Is anyone else really happy to hear we won't be drafting Jimmy Clausen? Because I am.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,136
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,136
Do you mean like just about everybody that posts here? YES!


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
I'm just happy we aren't investing another 1st round pick on a QB..

I've gotten to the point now, that Cleveland should only sign Free agent QB's.

Holcomb did decent.
Garcis did decent.
Delhomme should do decent.

All the rookies brought in here sucked it up.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Maybe Holmgren can work some magic like he did with Hasselbeck and Brunell and get us a decent late round guy.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Quote:

Is anyone else really happy to hear we won't be drafting Jimmy Clausen? Because I am.




Ditto.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Quote:

Quote:

Is anyone else really happy to hear we won't be drafting Jimmy Clausen? Because I am.




Ditto.




I'm not sure...

Wouldn't that give us a pickle to go with our ham sandwich?


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
No... that would change the whole basis of the sandwich... from ham to turkey.


[color:"white"]"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."

-- Mark Twain [/color]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
Quote:

I
Holcomb did decent.





No.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Quote:

Quote:

As for the second-ranked quarterback in the draft, Jimmy Clausen of Notre Dame, Holmgren was characteristically honest.

"I wish I liked him more," he said. "You know how you have a type of player that you like? It's not scientific. People like him a lot. He'll go high. But it would be hard for me [to take him]."




The PC way of saying he's not a franchise QB. Very much happy to hear Holmgren say that.




I second that.

This article just made me feel a whole bunch better for next month's draft.


[Linked Image from pic18.picturetrail.com]
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Thanks D-shot! After reading that article, I actually have CONFIDENCE for the first time that I will like our draft!

Give them a try:
Kafka
L. Brown
LeFevour

No Thanks:
Zac Robinson
Colt McCoy

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,199
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,199
j/c

see my sig He is the kid MH has been talking about


Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
Everyone seems to be happy about MH's proposed way of going about this. I see it as we are never going to have that franchise QB. Continuously drafting projects in the later rounds until you hit on one? Huh? Sounds dumb to me. Who's going to develop the guy?

The pickle is we aren't high enough in the draft to get THE guy. But I wouldn't wait until Round 3 or later. If that's their plan, we are going to see JT's career go down the drain. Get our HOF LT a HOF QB before it's too late.

I'm surprised at the giddiness of everyone here. This article really made me pause.


LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Quote:

Thanks D-shot! After reading that article, I actually have CONFIDENCE for the first time that I will like our draft!


No Thanks:
Zac Robinson
Colt McCoy




What's people's issue with Zac Robinson, he has been a successful QB and while he had a down year this year, was very good last year. Robinson throws a nice ball and in the performance drills at the probowl he was the best of the group IMO. As for senior bowl, he had a good showing there. He's not short either.

I have only seen the guy play a couple times, but since watching OkState play Texas two years ago, I really liked him. Robinson is only of the few later round QBs that I'd like to pick up.

So what's the reason not to draft Zac Robinson folks? I've asked this numerous times and gotten no answer. Robinson is the only later round guy I paticularly care for, I think it's just funny that you want us to shy away from him


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

I'm surprised at the giddiness of everyone here. This article really made me pause.




Because this year's class of QB's is awful outside of Sam Bradford. He's the only guy that I would classify as franchise QB and Holmgren made it quite clear he won't trade up for Bradford because the Rams will take him.

I have no problems in letting Jake play and maybe drafting one next year. Next year's class is going to be loaded with Locker, Mallet and maybe Andrew Luck. I have no problems in passing some of these guys, taking a flier on a late guy and going for one of them.

I for one am thrilled that we will probably not take Clausen with the 7th pick.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
He got my attention when Ok St. beat Georgia with his two passing TD's and one QB sneak.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
When I watched him his accuracy was awful, he didn't see open guys and totally fouled up 2 red-zone possesions. It was only one game, but he sure didn't look like an NFL qb to me. I may be wrong, but I'll pass on him and not lose a wink's sleep.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 21
T
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
T
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 21
I say draft Pike in the 3rd if he is there and develop him for two years. The thing I like about him is that he has a strong arm but has the ability to put touch on his passes. He can throw more accurately when he's not throwing rockets. DA had the arm but couldn't throw a catchable ball for the life of him... they were all rockets. Quinn didn't have the arm but still shotputted the ball through our players without any touch.

He also reminds me a little of Tom Brady when he was coming out... Didn't wow anyone with bullet passes but got the job done. Pike even looks like Brady with how frail he looked coming out and the durability questions. I'm not saying Pike will be Brady because there is a chance he could be a bust... I'm just saying there are a lot of similarities in his game and Brady's coming out, since Pike is being overlooked and Brady was overlooked and fell to the 6th.

Here are some of his high/lowlights and an interview.... He says some good things and handles the questions well

http://www.youtube.com/v/EmRyz-n5ZZc

http://www.youtube.com/v/Sv7qqIFAh5Y

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Quote:

Quote:

I'm surprised at the giddiness of everyone here. This article really made me pause.




Because this year's class of QB's is awful outside of Sam Bradford. He's the only guy that I would classify as franchise QB and Holmgren made it quite clear he won't trade up for Bradford because the Rams will take him.

I have no problems in letting Jake play and maybe drafting one next year. Next year's class is going to be loaded with Locker, Mallet and maybe Andrew Luck. I have no problems in passing some of these guys, taking a flier on a late guy and going for one of them.

I for one am thrilled that we will probably not take Clausen with the 7th pick.




Exactly. He doesn't think Clausen has it, so he's not going to pick him just to make it look like he's doing something about the QB position.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
I like his openness, weather what he says pans out, we will wait N see, many thing out of MH control can & will change that, but atleast he's open & talks about it.

If Tebows / McCoy is availbe late 2nd MH will nab one of them.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,865
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,865
Quote:

The pickle is we aren't high enough in the draft to get THE guy. But I wouldn't wait until Round 3 or later.




Now wait a minute Rish,, if you can't find a way to get THE guy, then are you suggesting we take whats left in the first round? I mean, if THE guy is Bradford and the only guy left is Clausen (and it looks like he's not a guy that MH likes), then what are you suggesting they do?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2013 NFL Season NFL Draft (2013) New Article on Drafting a QB

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5