Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
I wasn't 100% sure where to put this., hope this is ok

Quote:

A man in charge: Mike Holmgren's presence at NFL owners meetings affirms the extent of his control of the Browns
By Tony Grossi, The Plain Dealer
March 22, 2010, 11:41PM

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the Browns headquarters, people still refer to Mike Holmgren as coach. But at his first NFL annual league meetings, Holmgren is acting as club owner.

Indeed, the gamut of Holmgren's responsibilities as team president stretches farther and wider than any club executive in the NFL.

One day Holmgren is working out Florida quarterback Tim Tebow. The next he is conducting budget meetings within the Browns organization. A day later, he is listening in on the NFL's top secret strategies on labor and future growth of the sport.

"He's the reincarnation of Paul Brown and George Halas, only doing it in the 21st century," said noted sports consultant Marc Ganis. "He's doing everything those guys did."

Owner Randy Lerner is not even here. He has entrusted Holmgren with representing the views of the Browns on all league matters. If there were a vote on locking out players for the 2011 season -- there won't be one here -- Holmgren would cast it.


When the meeting agenda calls for an "executive session," meaning one person per club, to discuss the most sensitive of topics, Holmgren occupies the chair reserved for the Browns.

"Let me tell you, that stuff is interesting ... very interesting," Holmgren said Monday after sitting in on his first session.

When Lerner set out to hire a "serious, credible leader" for the organization in November, he cited the model established by Bill Parcells with the Miami Dolphins. Parcells, a Super Bowl-winning coach, brought instant credibility to a franchise that had descended into a 1-15 disaster. But the fact is Holmgren's duties go well beyond those of Parcells in Miami.

Parcells doesn't attend the league meetings (he loathes them), doesn't concern himself with the business operation of the Dolphins. Parcells immersed himself in changing the culture inside the Dolphins on the football end only. He hired the general manager, the coach, the coordinators, and wrote the manual on the kind of players he wants to bring in.

"I can tell you this, there's been a couple nights where I thought Parcells had it right," Holmgren said with a chuckle.

In Cleveland, Holmgren hired Bryan Wiedmeier, formerly of the Dolphins, coincidentally, to revamp the Browns' business operations from top to bottom. He hired General Manager Tom Heckert to do the same to football operations. And, of course, he'll be very active in choosing the next young quarterback to develop. He's also mentoring coach Eric Mangini.

"I'm kind of doing it in stages," Holmgren said of his juggling act. "We had budget meetings all [last] week. I never had that before as a coach. Being fiscally responsible -- coaches don't care about that -- but now that's part of my job. So I have to try and make decisions along those lines, too. Where are we overspending? Where are we heavy?

"It's kind of interesting to me. It's new. But I am running. I'm going a million miles an hour, but I think after the owners meeting then I can dive into football a little bit in the pre-draft [weeks]. I'm kind of compartmentalizing those things."

Holmgren prepped for the league meetings with a one-day visit with Wiedmeier at NFL headquarters in New York City. He also attended a special league meeting in south Florida last month, and that served to break the ice with other club owners.

Holmgren also brought a lot of equity from his years as an active member of the league competition committee while head coach with the Packers and Seahawks.

"Mike has always been very involved in the organization, with the Packers, the Seahawks, and now the Cleveland Browns," Commissioner Roger Goodell said Monday. "Mike is very engaged and obviously understands the game and the business. So I think Mike's going to be terrific."

Holmgren's sour experience in Seattle as coach, general manager and executive vice president left even some of his friends questioning his decision to take the Browns' job as president. A layer of management above him terminated his GM title and power after four seasons.

"I had a couple guys I respect tell me, 'Just coach. What do you want to do that other stuff for, anyway?'" Holmgren said. "I thought, I can do this. If I set my mind to something typically in my life, I can usually do that. Maybe not be the greatest in the world, but I can do it."

Ted Thompson, a Holmgren disciple and presently general manager of the Packers, explained why he thinks Holmgren can fill the bill.

"He is extraordinarily smart," Thompson said. "He is special in terms of being able to evaluate other people, understand their strengths, understand their weaknesses, and put them in position to do their jobs.

"I think he's good at that. He's comfortable delegating."

One of the small circle of football executives that Holmgren consulted with before accepting Lerner's offer was Bill Polian, president of the Colts. Like Parcells, Polian's responsibilities lie mostly on the football end.

"Without question [Holmgren can handle it]," Polian said. "He's been a high-level executive for a long period of time. Those of us fortunate to sit with him on the competition committee saw that. He understands the game. He's ready for this. Mike's got all the necessary skill sets. He'll be fine."

Notebook: Goodell endorsed the new overtime format being proposed, calling it "better" but not perfect. The new format would prohibit a team from winning a game on its first possession with a field goal. The second team would get a possession and sudden death would prevail after that. Overtime could be won with a touchdown on the first possession, however.

Owners vote on the change -- for postseason only -- on Wednesday. ... The 2010 league schedule will be released before the draft in mid-April, Goodell said.

© 2010 cleveland.com. All rights reserved.





#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 605
R
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 605
Interesting, thanks


"He who buys what he does not need steals from himself."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,086
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,086
What we have here is a true football mind with solid judgment attached. MH is the King of Berea for awhile. I feel better about this year's draft than last year's. Great post! Thankee!


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,201
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,201
Quote:

What we have here is a true football mind with solid judgment attached. MH is the King of Berea for awhile. I feel better about this year's draft than last year's. Great post! Thankee!





It certainly appears that way, but I'm going to wait for some results before I attend the coronation


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Quote:

It certainly appears that way, but I'm going to wait for some results before I attend the coronation




x2

I hope he doesn't burn himself out. He's doing A LOT of stuff.


Crowded elevators smell different to short people...
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
2 concerns:

1.I hope MH hasn't bit off a little more than he can chew
2. I wish RL was just a little bit more involved with his team,....just a little.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Quote:

2 concerns:

1.I hope MH hasn't bit off a little more than he can chew
2. I wish RL was just a little bit more involved with his team,....just a little.







Most very smart people (and I think MH qualifies) find a way to delegate the details of particular responsibilities.. MH seems to have done that with the two primary areas of the organization, Adminstration (wiediman (sp) ) and Football (heckert). Guys like holmgren seem to find a way to rise to the challenge... we'll see,,

As for Lerner being involved,, frankly, he's a money man.. he's a fan. I think he did exactly the right thing by finding and hiring a top level guy and turning over the reins to him..

I'm sure however that he and MH review things on a regular basis..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32
N
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32
Not sure if this has been posted yet but…

One-on-One With Mike Holmgren: Rebuilding the Browns

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Mike Holmgren emerged from his first presidential morning at the NFL's annual league meetings unscathed. No scars were visible, and Holmgren did not seem ruffled by the fact he was not in the annual photo of the league's coaches.

"I'm getting there," Holmgren said of his adjustment to his front-office role with the Cleveland Browns.

Holmgren is a rarity in the NFL: Ask a question and he'll answer. If he can't, he'll simply admit it. Monday, the new Browns president addressed many issues, among them his and the Browns' thinking about quarterbacks Jimmy Clausen (thumbs neither up nor down) and Sam Bradford (thumbs up) as the draft approaches.

He also discussed his thought process in keeping Eric Mangini as coach after a 5-11 season, his thinking in trading Brady Quinn and his approach to changing 11 years of losing in Cleveland. He even related a story about being challenged by a fan who was not thrilled the Browns had traded Quinn, and conceded season-ticket and suite sales are not what the team would want.

In an exclusive Q&A with FanHouse, Holmgren first specified his most important job: "Put a good product on the field. That and to do it with a certain degree of fiscal responsibility."

FanHouse: How do you go about changing a culture of losing that has been ingrained with the Browns for 10 years?

Mike Holmgren:. You have to present a plan, a philosophy. And you have to make sure people listen. And you ask them to buy in. Not everyone is going to buy in. It's, 'Show me, I've been through this. Show me.' Then what you have to do is you have to have a little success. A little victory here, a little victory here. You take those steps and it happens.

FH: When you say 'they' have to buy in, who do you mean?

MH: Everybody. We work in the building, but the Cleveland Browns are Cleveland's team. It's a storied franchise. Everybody ... players, coaches, people who work there, fans, media. It's everybody. Because everyone has a vested interest. All those people somehow have a vested interest in how the Browns do. I don't care what they say. When you can build something up, everybody feels good about their contribution ... I've seen it work. It can happen. I don't care how many years people felt it's not been good or people have been frustrated. It can happen.

FH: There has also been constant change with the Browns. Can any team succeed with that taking place?

MH: That's difficult. I was looking at a chart of all the first-round draft choices in the last 10 years. None of them are here, except for Joe Thomas and Alex Mack. That can't happen. So why does it happen? I suppose you can make mistakes, but all 10? No, what happens is the new guys come in and typically it's the coach or GM and right away every player that's not his he thinks can't play. That's one, and two, he wants to set his own mark. 'These are my guys. We won with my guys.' Well that's a very, very short-sighted way to look at things. It really is.

FH: Did this not just happen?

MH: It happened with the quarterback position.

FH: What about the trade of Kamerion Wimbley?

MH: Why we did that will clear up.

FH: Are you going to trade up to get a quarterback?

MH: Hang on. That one I have to slow play. The only real dramatic thing we did was the quarterback stuff. Derek Anderson, his salary didn't match with what he was doing. And we had the roster bonus so we had a decision to make. One of those guys was not going to be with us. We traded for [Seneca] Wallace. Brady, I think no one's quite sure yet about Brady. Some people are absolutely sure. I'm not ready to say that. When Jake became available, we signed him. I'm not saying it's necessarily a bridge. But he's not going to be here forever. At that point we did the other thing [and traded Quinn].

FH: Did you ever debate keeping Delhomme and Quinn on the roster together?

MH: No. My thing was if I could go out and sign a veteran quarterback who I thought could help us be better immediately, then I was going to do it. In which case Brady was going to be the odd man out. If that couldn't happen, I was prepared to keep Brady. The thing is that your head coach and your starting quarterback ... they have to like each other. That has to work. Otherwise it doesn't matter what I do. So what I'm trying to do is give Eric every chance to be successful with the people he deems [he needs]. So we did it.

FH: Did you fail to give Quinn the same patience you gave the coach?

MH: I think if you get the right coach he can coach for you for 25 years. Not for me, because I'm old. But he can be there for a long time. With players, it's different. You don't look at it the same way.

FH: Have you ruled out drafting a quarterback in the first or second round?

MH: I wouldn't say that.

FH: Would it be difficult to take one that high because you have so many other needs?

MH: I would say that's real, particularly if the one or two guys that I think are worthy of that choice aren't there. Then there's no question We're going to probably go another way. but I think the bigger question is do we package something to get up in there. Which is still a possibility. We haven't had that final strategy meeting yet.

FH: Are there a couple quarterbacks worth that effort?

MH: I think so. One for sure.

FH: He [Sam Bradford] might go No. 1 though?

MH: Yeah, he might. But who knows?

FH: The other guy?

MH: There's a difference of opinion as to the value of this young man.

FH: Is that [Texas' Colt] McCoy?

MH: No, I like McCoy.

FH: [Notre Dame's Jimmy] Clausen?

MH: I don't want to get too specific. But that's the debate. Clausen is a big debate in the room.

FH: You would have to have unanimity to take a quarterback that high, though, right?

MH: That's a good point. And you've seen it happen [in Cleveland] and it can't happen anymore. I will not allow it to happen in Cleveland anymore. When you get down the road and you go into a meeting and one guy says, 'I told you we shouldn't.' No, no. Here's our guy. Speak now or forever hold your peace. If we pick this guy or we sign a guy in free agency ... we collectively talked about it, argued about it. Once we pick him he's ours.

FH: What about [Florida's Tim] Tebow?

MH: I like him. A lot. We were all at his workout. I think he showed the ability to change his motion. The question still remains when you get playing hard and stuff, what does he do? But you really love the kid. He's a winner, clearly. He'll be one of the guys we'll discuss.

FH: Are there mid-round quarterbacks in this year's draft?

MH: There always are. Every year. You dig around in there ... you can find one that has the potential to maybe play. But if you pick them like we did [Matt] Hasselbeck in the sixth round or [Mark] Brunell in the fifth round, they're not expected to come in and be a savior. You have time to groom them, watch them. Then you say, 'no,' and you pick another one the next year. I always like to do that. And you find them. Sometimes by great scouting, sometimes by accident.

FH: You've talked about a system you believe in in bringing along a young quarterback. What are the tenets in your system?

MH: The guys that I had were fortunate to be with me a long time, so they played with one coordinator, one system. So they get to be very good at that. That's a huge thing. Then if they're talented, if they can throw the ball a little bit, if they're tough, smart, you've got a real chance. It's a very quarterback friendly thing. The problem with quarterbacks is often times a guy will have four coordinators in six years. Stuff like that. He's played there six years but he's never been the player you thought he could be because he's learning new systems. Look at Hasselbeck last year. They bring in a new system ... even for the veteran guy it's hard. The Eagles with Donovan McNabb ... if they were to trade him, he's been in a system for how may years? Look at [Brett] Favre. A good example. He goes with Eric [Mangini] (pictured) to New York. There's no way he knows the system, so he writes 15 plays that he likes. What plays are you going to call in a game? I don't care if you have the finest player, if you're going to change systems it's hard, particularly on a quarterback.

FH: But that's been one of the problems in Cleveland, and for Quinn. There have been different coordinators and systems. How do you show that your tenure will be different from the other ones before you? How do you get stability?

MH: Hopefully you make the decision on the right coach. Then you make a conscious effort to live through the bumps with the coach. Unless all of a sudden you go, 'Wow. I didn't know this guy.' You make that commitment. Then you make the same commitment [to the quarterback]. Say you draft a quarterback high. You make that commitment. You teach him, you stay with him, he believes in you. It's a confidence thing. And you kind of move on together. That's how it works. You look at the real successful teams over the years, the Patriots, Eagles, they have stability at that position and usually they have stability with the coach too.

FH: Then let me ask this directly, how do you answer the perception that remains that you want to coach the Browns and that Eric is on a one-year trial?

MH: (Hearty laugh). I'd just say no, that's not how I'm looking at it. Honestly. Nope. What I want to do right now is make him the best coach he can be. Help him be here a long time. Probably be here a long time after I'm gone. That's the idea.

FH: Whose offensive system is it?

MH: That's a better question. What we're trying to evaluate right now is last year's Browns offense. It wasn't very good. Why? Was it players, was it what they were doing? Once you have those answers, then you go about fixing those answers. If it is scheme, I'm not coaching the team but I absolutely can and feel the freedom to talk to [offensive coordinator] Brian [Daboll], talk to Eric. And [longtime Holmgren assistant] Gil Haskell is in the building. He's talking to Brian all the time. To try some of the stuff that worked for me forever and ever and ever. It just works. But unless I'm coaching the team, ultimately I'm not going to call the play. It's not my call. But I think I can help without stepping on anyone's toes, or to put it better without breaking my promises to those guys.

FH: Does that mean it's a combination system?

MH: I don't know. I see some similarities in what they do and what I've done. Plays are plays and you'll see a lot of different teams running the same plays. There might be a little subtle difference here. Maybe a better way to make a better mousetrap, if you will. But then it gets down to how you like to play offense. It's really three things. What do you like to do? What's your philosophy? Do you have the players to do that? If you don't have the players to do it, don't do it. If you keep trying to do it but you can't do it, try something else. It's not my system right or wrong, it's how you score points, how you move the ball. That's the second thing. The third thing -- it certainly was in Green Bay -- but our weather and all those things in Cleveland factor in to what will help you be successful in your system. You get feeling good about those three things then you have a chance.

FH: You have made it clear you are not the coach. But is it hard to sit next to the coach at a news conference and answer questions? Is that a tough balance?

MH: I don't think so. We talked about how we want to do that. I might be more talkative than he is, but if there's a question I think I can probably answer better I would answer it. If it's something referring to a player he coached and he understands it better, then he can answer it. As long as he and I understand that and nobody gets their feathers ruffled, it should be fine.

FH: You're the two that matter?

MH: I think so. In fact, at some point I'll send [general manager Tom] Heckert. Let those two answer. That's my ultimate goal.

FH: People want to hear from you though.

MH: I get that, and that's why I'm trying to be upfront. I want everyone in the media room to feel a little better about the whole thing. I've always said if the team plays lousy, write it. But don't write the team is playing lousy before they play the game. I know things build up, but we're going to try to be open and honest. You've got to know who you are, but it doesn't have to be in my opinion an adversarial situation. You have your job to do, [Mangini] has his job to do, I have my job to do. Some things we can't talk about. Most things we can. What's the big deal?

FH: But is it still challenging not to do too much in terms of the returning to your coaching roots?

MH: So far it hasn't been. I always try to tell [Mangini] where I'm coming from. So there are no curveballs thrown at him. I've been a coach for so long, I think I know how coaches think. How I would react.

FH: Did you watch a lot of tape before you made the decision to keep Mangini? Did you talk to players?

MH: I watched tape. I didn't talk to any players.

FH:. Because?

MH: If you were to talk to my old players, I thought they all loved me. They didn't all love me. You're going to get a couple who would say he was unfair, didn't do this. I hope not many, but you would get a couple. Players are players. I did talk to administrators who helped him. I did talk to people that I talk to about a lot of my football decisions. Two or three guys that I trust who are smart football guys who have no agenda.

FH: It almost seemed like your personality would not think it fair for a coach to have only one year.

MH: That wasn't the overriding thing, but it was part of it. Before we had discussions, that was already on the list. One year, not long enough. Little note. Had I come in even with that and didn't get the feeling that he and I could work together, it wouldn't have mattered.

FH: What are you hearing from fans about the team?

MH: It's very, very positive. Guys are moving me into my house, the movers. At the market. Everyone has an opinion and everyone will say it. It's an interesting thing.

I'm going to church last Sunday and I come out and get in my car and the guy across the street comes running out in his shorts and his T-shirt. It's Sunday morning.

He said, 'What are you doing Mike?'

I had met him before. nice fellow.

'What are you doing?'

I said, 'I'm going to church.'

He said, 'No. About Brady Quinn.'

I said, 'Calm down.'

He said, 'I'm a Brady Quinn fan and he didn't have enough time.'

I said, 'First of all whatever I do I'm going to think of the team first. Second, this is why I did it.' Went through two or three things.

He kind of said OK, then he said, 'What do I tell my friends?'

I said, 'Just tell them to trust me a little bit. Watch what happens.'

He said OK and ran back into his house.

FH: What do you expect from the fans?

MH: To go from where the team was last year or were the last couple years, to go to 11-5 from 5-11, that usually doesn't happen. But, I do expect improvement. And the fans do too.

I would ask them to watch how we play. See the effort. See if we're better. Look at what we've done. They're knowledgeable fans. Not unlike the fans in Green Bay.

My hope is that when the fans see us play next year they'll see a team they can feel good about. Ease some of the frustration.

FH: Are season tickets and suite sales good?

MH: No, no. We can do better there. But I'm hopeful that people get back on board if they've decided not to. I understand the economy. That's a real thing. It's quite an investment. But we want to create a situation at the stadium where it's really the place to be on Sunday. We were able to do that in Seattle through a lot of hard work over a couple years. It became the happening place. It was fun. That's what I'm hoping for right now.

FH: Do you want fans to be patient or is that not realistic?

MH: They've been pretty patient for a long time. I'm just saying to look for improvement. How that equates to wins and losses, we'll have to see. My hope is that you'll see a change, a dramatic change. Now its a little far-reaching, I think, to think you can flip it tremendously. Miami did it, but then they fell back a little bit this year. It doesn't usually happen that way.


[Linked Image from members.core.com][Linked Image from 3dflags.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,341
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,341
Great read, thanks.

I knew I'd like Holmgren, but not this much. No Botch doublespeak, no RAC say-nothings.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Good read.

I didn't know that Pat Mac had left the Beacon Journal.

What stuck out to me .....

Quote:

FH: What about the trade of Kamerion Wimbley?

MH: Why we did that will clear up.




Sounds like either something is in the works ... or something was going on with Whimbley.

Quote:

FH: But that's been one of the problems in Cleveland, and for Quinn. There have been different coordinators and systems. How do you show that your tenure will be different from the other ones before you? How do you get stability?

MH: Hopefully you make the decision on the right coach. Then you make a conscious effort to live through the bumps with the coach. Unless all of a sudden you go, 'Wow. I didn't know this guy.' You make that commitment. Then you make the same commitment [to the quarterback]. Say you draft a quarterback high. You make that commitment. You teach him, you stay with him, he believes in you. It's a confidence thing. And you kind of move on together. That's how it works. You look at the real successful teams over the years, the Patriots, Eagles, they have stability at that position and usually they have stability with the coach too.




He makes a good point about coaches and QBs almost having a symbiotic relationship.

Quote:

FH: Did you watch a lot of tape before you made the decision to keep Mangini? Did you talk to players?

MH: I watched tape. I didn't talk to any players.

FH:. Because?

MH: If you were to talk to my old players, I thought they all loved me. They didn't all love me. You're going to get a couple who would say he was unfair, didn't do this. I hope not many, but you would get a couple. Players are players. I did talk to administrators who helped him. I did talk to people that I talk to about a lot of my football decisions. Two or three guys that I trust who are smart football guys who have no agenda.




I thought that this was an interesting insight behind the coaching decision, nd the shape it took.

Besides .... which players should he have asked? The only 2 really safe players IMHO were Cribbs and Joe Thomas. Anyone else, including both QBs, last year's starting RB ... etc., could (and were) be headed out of town ......


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32
N
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32
Quote:

Sounds like either something is in the works ... or something was going on with Whimbley.




Yeah… That’s a bit of a bombshell really…

KW was traded for a third round pick and multiple teams were reportedly interested in him so it’s hard to believe that there was anything wrong physically…

I wouldn’t think that there would be any kind of issue’s with attitude… That kind of thing likely would never reach the public at this point or “clear up”…

Also, it’s hard to believe his position and production will be immediately addressed and replaced in the draft short of using our first pick…


[Linked Image from members.core.com][Linked Image from 3dflags.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,341
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,341
I think Wimbley is just not that good. Good guy it seems, but average in everything a LB is supposed to do (average at best). I've got zero issue with that trade.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
This guy gives us more substance in 10 minutes than EM did all last year I like it. Might be a little too loosey goosy and honest when it comes to draft info though ? I guess it really doesn't matter though..other teams know what we need as well as we do by now. As to KW and BQ, I think he just felt they had seen what they were getting and it was time to try and upgrade.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Thanks, very good read.

Mike is making really kind of difficult to not set my expectations too high for this year.

Quote:

FH: What about the trade of Kamerion Wimbley?

MH: Why we did that will clear up.




Ok, my interest is piqued.


Crowded elevators smell different to short people...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Quote:

Might be a little too loosey goosy and honest when it comes to draft info though ? I guess it really doesn't matter though..other teams know what we need as well as we do by now.




I'd be really like to hear a former GM's take on how often teams really get surprised by another teams actions on draft day due to "smokescreens", or if it's more an attempt to keep the media at bay.


Crowded elevators smell different to short people...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,465
Quote:

2 concerns:

1.I hope MH hasn't bit off a little more than he can chew
2. I wish RL was just a little bit more involved with his team,....just a little.




I want Lerner as far away from any football decision making as possible. Just let him pay the bills and collect profits. Especially with his buddies in his ear telling him what to do.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Hey Net,, first let me say thank you for posting this.. Good read... some initial thoughts I had as I read it:

Quote:

FH: Did you ever debate keeping Delhomme and Quinn on the roster together?

MH: No. My thing was if I could go out and sign a veteran quarterback who I thought could help us be better immediately, then I was going to do it. In which case Brady was going to be the odd man out. If that couldn't happen, I was prepared to keep Brady.




NO,,, it was never an option to have Delhomme and Quinn on the roster.. Yeah, he made his decision early on,, I believe that now.

That answer continues with this:

Quote:

The thing is that your head coach and your starting quarterback ... they have to like each other. That has to work. Otherwise it doesn't matter what I do. So what I'm trying to do is give Eric every chance to be successful with the people he deems [he needs]. So we did it.





He clearly decided on Eric before he tackled the QB postion, or so it appears. Is he saying that Mangini and Quinn didn't appear to get along? Or am I reading too much into that?

Quote:

FH: Did you fail to give Quinn the same patience you gave the coach?

MH: I think if you get the right coach he can coach for you for 25 years. Not for me, because I'm old. But he can be there for a long time. With players, it's different. You don't look at it the same way.





I hadn't really given that a lot of thought.. It's a good point..

Quote:

FH: Would it be difficult to take one that high because you have so many other needs?

MH: I would say that's real, particularly if the one or two guys that I think are worthy of that choice aren't there. Then there's no question We're going to probably go another way. but I think the bigger question is do we package something to get up in there. Which is still a possibility. We haven't had that final strategy meeting yet.





Sounds to me like EVERYTHING is on the table and up for discussion.. either that or the decisions are made and he's just blowing smoke LOL

If you just take his comments about Clausen, Tebow and McCoy at face value, it sounds like Clausen isn't the answer but that Tebow or McCoy could be. And both are supposedly scheduled to come in for a visit.

I loved the exchange with the fan running out to his car to ask him what he was doing with Quinn... wow.. he apparently handled it pretty well..

I know it's early, but so far, I'm really liking having Holmgren here..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32
N
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32
Quote:

I've got zero issue with that trade.





Not saying I take issue with the trade either… Just that it’s curious… How does this move become “clear”?

KW was no top tear outside linebacker… .
But he wasn’t a “ham sandwich” either… hehehe …sorry…

I’m guessing a free agent acquisition or trade is on the horizon…


[Linked Image from members.core.com][Linked Image from 3dflags.com]
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
Really enjoyed that article, thanks for posting it. I'm glad to know he is getting questions from friends on the street, I wonder if he got any of that in Seattle. If he did, I doubt it was to the level of fan interest here in Cleveland.


"The medium for the bad news was ESPN, which figured. The network represents much of what is loud, obnoxious and empty in sports today."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,678
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,678
Quote:

Quote:

It certainly appears that way, but I'm going to wait for some results before I attend the coronation




x2

I hope he doesn't burn himself out. He's doing A LOT of stuff.






he won't. he has the people in place to pull up the slack. In these beginning stages he has to be pretty involved, but if everything goes as planned, all he will have to do is carry a oil can around and oil an occasional squeaky hinge.

He knows both Brian and Tom are more than capable of running the show with little interference or follow-up.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Quote:

Not saying I take issue with the trade either… Just that it’s curious… How does this move become “clear”?





Mangini may have let a little cat out of the bag.. you can find the article posted in the Free Agency thread in this forum.. the short story is, there is more trades in the wind and that involved moving KW to make it happen..

I don't understand it really, but that's basically what Mangini said..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32
N
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32
Thanks... I just saw that...
I wonder what possible benefit could come from both MH and EM quite purposefully leaking information of this nature...


[Linked Image from members.core.com][Linked Image from 3dflags.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Dunno,, Heck, I was surprised that Mangini was even at the meetings....LOL (not really)

There has got to be a ton of different ways that this will work out.. if I try to think of them all, my head with explode


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,007
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,007
Quote:

The thing is that your head coach and your starting quarterback ... they have to like each other. That has to work. Otherwise it doesn't matter what I do. So what I'm trying to do is give Eric every chance to be successful with the people he deems [he needs]. So we did it.




This tells me EM didnt care for BQ.


Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hmm.. While I appreciate the candor and honesty.. when he starts talking about Clausen and other available QB's and evaluating them to an interviewer I am screaming inside.. "DOES STFU MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU?"

I am of the firm belief that a GM / President says nothing to tip his hand about the draft. I wish he'd hold his tongue a little bit. We don't need to know nor do the other 31 teams.

Course.. there is always the misdirection ploy.. hmmph..


SaintDawg™

Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
I know exactly what you are saying Saint... I kinda feel the same way. I can't tell if this is misdirection or someone just shooting from the hip.. if it's the latter, bad move, if it's the former,, I guess it doesn't matter at all then.....


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
It doesn't matter if he's telling the truth or throwing a smokescreen. If it's a smokescreen, it's a smokescreen. If it's the truth, people will still assume or suspect that it is a smokescreen.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Quote:

It doesn't matter if he's telling the truth or throwing a smokescreen. If it's a smokescreen, it's a smokescreen. If it's the truth, people will still assume or suspect that it is a smokescreen.





Funny how that works isn't it


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Quote:

I'm going to wait for some results before I attend the coronation




Amen. People are getting their hopes WAY up. The media seems to have a ton fo faith in Holmgren too, no doubt fueling it even more . . .

I'll believe it when I see it.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Oh, I see. I should have waited for a know it all to show.

Hows the homework going?


SaintDawg™

Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
There was zero know it all tone there at all.

Some of you see what you want to see.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802
It's funny all the flack you catch for just being young around here, isn't it?

I see some people attacking you as if you're Ammo on the sauce sometimes. I think some just get their panties in a bunch thinking someone your age may have a different, more plausible insight and just shoot out their defense mechanisms. Don't let it keep you from typing, though. I think sound, rational logic is in style right now.

Back to the article, I just have to say I love Holmgren's presence. No BS from this guy (unless we're going to get psychoanalytical to examine what is/is not smokescreenin') and I like that. I can't help but get the feeling that we may really use those picks to move up for Bradford (I would hope for him. I just don't want to give up too much.) or just use them to move maybe back into the late first round or early second. We have just so much flexibility and the draft is taking eons to get here. I'm an impatient American. I want stuff and I want it NOW.


Politicians are puppets, y'all. Let's get Geppetto!

Formerly 4yikes2yoshi0
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663
Assuming he succeeds here...

It looks like Holmgren is lining up his resume to possible be the next commish... Just a mild observation from a person who doesn't post much. But his resume would look really good going for that vote if he succeeds here.


KeysDawg

The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. - Carl Sagan
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Quote:

Assuming he succeeds here...

It looks like Holmgren is lining up his resume to possible be the next commish... Just a mild observation from a person who doesn't post much. But his resume would look really good going for that vote if he succeeds here.






Hey Keys,, hows things in Florida these days.. hope all is well,

Being that MH is 61, and it's going to take at least 3 to 5 years to see if he's truly successful here, which would put him at as much as 66, and he's not a lawyer,, I'd say there isn't much of a chance at all that he's even thinking about the Commish job..

Just a guess however..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Goodell is my age.. 51. Thats a 10 year gap for Goodell and Holmgren. I'd have to assume that MH is retired before Goodell.


SaintDawg™

Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Quote:


Goodell is my age.. 51. Thats a 10 year gap for Goodell and Holmgren. I'd have to assume that MH is retired before Goodell.




Yup, there is that also.... I don't see him even thinking about the commish job.. But hey, I've been wrong a couple of thousand times before so maybe


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Quote:

It's funny all the flack you catch for just being young around here, isn't it?

I see some people attacking you as if you're Ammo on the sauce sometimes. I think some just get their panties in a bunch thinking someone your age may have a different, more plausible insight and just shoot out their defense mechanisms. Don't let it keep you from typing, though. I think sound, rational logic is in style right now.





I think what gets DT in trouble is when he says "This guy is *x*" or "A is better than B" and not frequently enough "I think this guy is *x* " or "I like A better than B"... then telling someone their opinion is incorrect. I think he's gotten better about it recently, but the impression is still there.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
About as accurate as it gets there Steve. Thanks.


SaintDawg™

Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
Quote:

I see some people attacking you as if you're Ammo on the sauce sometimes.


Dude....have you ever read Ammo......he doesn't need to be on the sauce in order to attack ...LOL


I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...

What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
I can see how that may rub people the wrong way, but here is how it is for me. Every day in school, I am taught not to say "I think" because it isn't as strong of an opinion. And when writing articles, how do you think it looks when a journalist says "I think"?

It's hard for me to change writing styles when switching between venues.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Holmgren in charge (article)

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5