Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,851
Likes: 159
Legend
OP Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,851
Likes: 159
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2010/07/cleveland_browns_quarterback_o.html

Quote:

CLEVELAND, Ohio — The biggest questions heading into Browns training camp today are what went so horribly wrong with quarterback Jake Delhomme in Carolina last season, and what makes anyone think this year will be any different?

The two people closest to Delhomme during his horrible 2009 -- former Browns and current Panthers quarterbacks coach Rip Scherer, and Josh McCown, Delhomme's backup and close friend -- know exactly how it all unraveled, but also are convinced that Delhomme can return to his Pro Bowl and Super Bowl form in Cleveland.

In fact, Scherer blames himself in large part for Delhomme's meltdown last season.

"We took Jake away from being the guy that he had become, which had gotten him the success he had," said Scherer. "It was like trying to stick a square peg in a round hole. I kind of kick myself, because I hate that Jake went through that under my watch."

Delhomme, 35, endured the worst season of his career -- one in which he threw 18 interceptions and only eight touchdowns en route to a dismal 4-7 record. It was so bad that his beloved Panthers fans turned on him -- despite a 12-4 record in 2008 -- and the team let him go despite still owing him $12.5 million guaranteed.

"Jake would never do anything but blame himself entirely for that season," said Scherer. "But there's more to the story, and I accept responsibility for it."


When Scherer took over as Panthers quarterbacks coach in 2009, he and offensive coordinator Jeff Davidson, a former Browns assistant, decided to implement a more structured approach to the passing game, with specific rules for where to throw the ball against certain coverages. It was a mix of the New England system and the things former Browns offensive coordinator Rob Chudzinski brought to Cleveland.

"Jake had evolved into more of a 'feel way' than a systematic way," said Scherer. "We just felt it would be best for Jake and for our quarterback position in general."

Delhomme had become so close to previous quarterbacks coach Mike McCoy -- who left to become Denver's offensive coordinator -- that the two had their own special language, one that even a veteran quarterback such as McCown struggled to understand at first.

"When I got traded there just before the 2008 season, I was sometimes going, 'What's the rule? Where are we going with the ball in this instance and that instance?' " recalled McCown. "Mike knew where Jake was going with the ball, but it might catch Jeff and everyone else off guard."

But who could argue? The system helped Delhomme reach two NFC Championship Games, a Super Bowl in the 2003 season, a Pro Bowl and a 12-4 record in 2008. The only time it really failed him was in the 2008 divisional playoffs against the Cardinals, when Delhomme threw five interceptions and lost a fumble in a crushing end to their Cinderella season. Then McCoy left for Denver.

"With the change at quarterback coach, there was an opportunity for Jeff to approach things the way he wanted to," said Scherer. "It was a mutual decision."

Scherer immediately flew to Delhomme's hometown of Breaux Bridge, La., a tiny town west of New Orleans, to lay out the plan. "We spent a day together and had dinner and talked about it, and Jake really wanted to become more fundamental and technique-oriented," said Scherer. "He felt like he had gotten away from that, so he really embraced it. If he had expressed any reluctance, I would've met him somewhere in the middle."

But with the playoff debacle hanging over him like the thick Louisiana air, Delhomme was open to anything. Besides, he had just received a huge contract extension -- including $20 million guaranteed -- and was determined to pay dividends. The Carolina fans were counting on him.

But not long into camp, it became evident Delhomme wasn't right. Playing by the new set of rules was harder on him than anyone guessed it would be.

"It was like teaching an old dog new tricks," said McCown. "Jake was behind the eight-ball because he had so much to de-program."

Delhomme forged ahead, not letting on to Scherer that he was struggling.

"Jake's such a good team guy and a coachable guy," said Scherer. "He never fought it one day. And it's not like he wasn't capable. He's one of the smartest quarterbacks in the game."

Delhomme often confided in McCown.

"There were times early on where he'd say, 'I just want to do it my way,' " said McCown. "Then Jake would come back on his own and say: 'I'm going to stick with it. I want to do what Rip's coaching me to do.' "

In the days leading up to the 2009 opener against the Eagles, Delhomme's wife Keri -- who had begun dating him when they were freshmen in high school -- called him out.

"She said: 'You just need to have fun. You're not yourself. You're not even close to being the Jake that I know,' " recalled Delhomme. "She could sense it in my body language."

But he was too deep into the new way to turn back. Picking up where he left off against the Cardinals, Delhomme threw four interceptions and lost a fumble in a 38-10 drubbing. All told, it was 11 turnovers for Delhomme in two games -- nine picks and two lost fumbles. He earned a 14.7 passer rating and was booed off the field as McCown trotted on.

"It was heartbreaking," said McCown, who was placed on injured reserve after that game with knee and ankle injuries. "He put so much pressure on himself to come back from that playoff loss, and then he was starting all over mentally. It was tough. As a quarterback, you're fighting that feeling of, 'No matter what I do, something bad's going to happen.' "

Delhomme remained the starter but threw two touchdown passes and seven interceptions in the first three games for an 0-3 start.

McCown said Delhomme was "thinking too much at the line of scrimmage. All of a sudden, you're moving slower, and you don't throw the ball with as much authority. You're throwing it too late, it gets tipped, it gets picked."

Periodically, Scherer would ask Delhomme if the new approach was to blame.

"He always said he was fine," said Scherer. "He didn't want to be the guy that said, 'I can't do that or I don't want to do it that way.' "


Finally, after consulting with McCown and others, Scherer told Delhomme about midway through the season to go back to his comfort zone.

"In the quarterback room, I said, 'We're going to back up here with Jake, but you young guys, keep doing what we've been doing,' and then Jake reinforced it," said Scherer. "He said, 'It's the right way for you, it's just not working for me right now.' "

But reversing field, without McCoy's voice in the headset and the new way creeping in, didn't work. In Week 12, he threw four interceptions against the Jets for a total of 18 in 11 games -- and 23 in his previous 12. A broken finger late in the fourth quarter settled the issue. Delhomme was placed on injured reserve for the final five games.

While he was out, third-year quarterback Matt Moore revived the offense, winning four of five.

"I was able to sit back and watch someone pure, someone with no scars," said Delhomme. "I watched Matt go in and fling it around. It was extremely beneficial to me, because I saw someone play loose, the way I wasn't playing for the first time in my career."

Delhomme acknowledged losing his longtime quarterbacks coach McCoy was a blow, "but then again I'd be blaming somebody else for me not playing well, and that's not it at all. I'm still really good friends with Rip. I love Rip. We did things a little bit different, might've read things a little bit different. After that first game, I started playing not to make a mistake, and you can't do that."

On his free-agent visit to Cleveland, Delhomme explained to Browns President Mike Holmgren why things went so bad for him in Carolina, and Holmgren understood -- even drawing a parallel between Delhomme's season and that of Seattle's Matt Hasselbeck, who was also adjusting to a new quarterbacks coach and went 5-9. Satisfied that it was an aberration, Holmgren signed Delhomme to a two-year deal and installed him as the probable starter.

"I think other than the fact that he's won a lot, I think what made Jake attractive to those guys is that he knows the offense," said McCown. "There should be a lot of carryover, which hopefully will help him be more successful. I don't think he'll experience the growing pains he had last year. I know he'll do great."

Browns offensive coordinator Brian Daboll, who spent six seasons with Davidson in New England, acknowledged there is plenty of carryover, not just from Carolina's offense, but with some of the West Coast scheme the Browns are incorporating this season. Delhomme learned that offense from Packers coach Mike McCarthy when the two were in New Orleans together.

"Jake and I are speaking the same language," said Daboll. "I've been fortunate to be around some great quarterbacks like Tom Brady and Brett Favre, and Jake fits right in there with them. He's a very savvy quarterback and a smart, smart guy."

Daboll hasn't sensed any of the issues that plagued Delhomme last season.

"He's been playing loose and confident," said Daboll. "His leadership has been tremendous, and nothing fazes him because he's seen it all before. He's had a lot of success, and I plan on him having a lot of success here."

Delhomme's wife has noticed the change.

"She says I'm back to myself," he said. "I'm having a blast. It's fun again. Fresh and exciting."

Scherer isn't surprised.

"Jake has all the tools, the whole skill set he needs to win," he said. "He's got something to prove, and I think this will be a positive catalyst for him. I hope he's successful -- for 15 games next season, except the one against us."

© 2010 cleveland.com. All rights reserved.





Well, I guess it makes sense. if that's truly the case, then maybe all this talk of Delhomme being done, isn't very accurate..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
Jake had evolved into more of a 'feel way' than a systematic way

But don't we run a systematic offense as well??? We are not a true WCO but there are still components of it. This article is supposed to give warm fuzzy feelings, but it kind of makes me get nervous about Jake.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,547
Likes: 987
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,547
Likes: 987
Quote:

Jake had evolved into more of a 'feel way' than a systematic way

But don't we run a systematic offense as well??? We are not a true WCO but there are still components of it. This article is supposed to give warm fuzzy feelings, but it kind of makes me get nervous about Jake.






I am not really that worried and the article makes me feel better.

The guy is 35. QBs can play at a high level in to their 40's, so I have to rule out he has just hit the physical wall. Physically he still has 3-5 years....maybe even 6-7 years.

He is a proven, good QB....so something had to play a role in his poor play last year.

A fresh start is exactly what he needed. I look forward to good things out of the guy.

I will be interested to see fan reports from camp. I hope they look at Jake and report on how he looks...not so much how he is playing but rather does he look fit....does he look fresh and excited....does he have the fire so to speak.


If he has hit the physical wall, I guess it will show, but as I said, I find it hard to believe he has hit the physical/mental wall at this age.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,851
Likes: 159
Legend
OP Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,851
Likes: 159
It's funny how different people look at the same article and have different takes.

Bigfoot thought it made him uneasy.. Peen took it as a good sign. To me, it's that a guy like Holmgren must have believed it., otherwise, I doubt Delhomme would be here. Holmgren being one of the most qualified guys in the league on QB's,,,, you almost have to take his word for it..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Damanshot #515973 07/31/10 12:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 142
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 142
Im on the Delhomme bandwagon!! Anyone going to join me? I think he will be solid and back to old form. Notice my sig


Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,550
Likes: 11
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,550
Likes: 11
I dont think camp will show much of anything, either way. It is what happens once he gets hit. Anytime he got hit last year he seemed to push the panic button turning his back to the defense and just slinging it down field.

It is hard to get that mental edge back once a QB becomes gunshy in the pocket but it can be done. Kurt Warner in NY is the best example. His career is over then he makes the move to the Cards and amazingly recovers his confidence and his career. I dont think it will happen for Jake but it easily could especially with a Joe Thomas blindside protection.

BADdog #515975 07/31/10 12:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 587
M
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
M
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 587
Quote:

Im on the Delhomme bandwagon!! Anyone going to join me? I think he will be solid and back to old form. Notice my sig




I was happy with it from the beginning while 90% of this board pissed and moaned.


[Linked Image from netanimations.net]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,851
Likes: 159
Legend
OP Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,851
Likes: 159
One of the comments in the article indicated that the reason he was a little Gunshy (not the word they used, but you did) is because he wasn't comfortable in the system that Rip and Jeff installed.

Again, I'm going with Holmgren didn't see it as a problem and if there is anyone that should know,, he's that guy.. I think if he believed what you believed, he'd not have signed delhomme at all..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 814
A
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
A
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 814
While I appreciate an article that helps add more information to the Jake meltdown I am a little distressed that the style of offense that Jake had to adjust to( structured approach) is probably closer to what the Browns run than go by his feelings approach that Jake excelled in. My guess is the go by the seat of your pants style will not sit well with Mr. Control: Mangini and still have to fear this is NOT a good fit for Jake or the Browns. For me all that article did was underline that a structured approach to the passing game was a change that was ill suited to Jake and probably closer to waht the Browns run. I am not confident that a jumpy coach like Mangini , who is a control freak will do well when his QB does not respond well to the tight fisted coaching style.

If Jake flops so will the Browns and Mangini as well.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,851
Likes: 159
Legend
OP Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,851
Likes: 159
Quote:

is probably closer to what the Browns run




You mean closer to what they ran LAST YEAR! You don't have any idea what the O will look like this season.

While we still have Daboll, we are missing the QB's from last year that appear to have had limited ability to perform,, otherwise one or both would still be here.

So, because of a lack of a good QB, do we really know what Daboll's offense really can do., Add in Gil Haskell and maybe a little touch of Holmgren and some new running backs, and the whole thing could be completely different than what we saw last year.

Since the premise for your post relies on the thought that we will run the same offense this year that we ran last year, I'd say the rest of your post has little to no value..

just sayin


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Doesn't anybody find it ironic that Rip, the guy who coached those great QBs like Frye and Anderson, here in Cleveland screwed up a good QB?

When he was here, I remember reading what a good QB coach he was. Yet, our QBs were bad. Davidson was not a good OC either, though it was in a limited time here. And to add in Chud to the mix, I mean IMO that might be what happened to Jake.

The guy was successful until these "coaches" tried to change him. To me Scherer even seems to admit it. Good coaches try to use a players skills to their advantage, it seems like these guys try to make QBs change to fit their "system".

I always questioned how good a QB coach Scherer was. He never seemed to help our QBs. I think he coached Bernie at one point, but Kosar is a different animal.

I have some optimism as far as Jake is concerned. The two QBs we had last year, and the way Mangini couldn't commit to either showed me that they didn't possess the talent to be franchise QBs. Delhomme has already been one, and the above story makes me believe he will be again, if even only for a short time.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Quote:


The guy is 35. QBs can play at a high level in to their 40's, so I have to rule out he has just hit the physical wall. Physically he still has 3-5 years....maybe even 6-7 years.




This is the exception and not the norm, of course.

MyDawgsBite #515981 08/01/10 09:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
K
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
I am just hoping Jake can be a mid-80's to low 90 rated QB for a year or two

that way it keeps McCoy on the bench and gives him some time to develop...i really don't want Mccoy playing this year, and I hope Holmgren keeps to his word and allows McCoy to redshirt this year...

McCoy reminds me of a young Hasselbeck...he just needs time to develop like Matt Did (Matt sat in Green Bay for awhile before leaving to go to Seattle with Holmgren)

I think McCoy could be our QB....next year in the draft we need to focus on LB, DL, and WR

McCoy was my fav pick in this draft....he just needs time to develop...hopefully Jake can play well enough for that to happen, thats all i am asking for.

Knight_Of_Brown #515982 08/01/10 09:55 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Holmgren was in Seattle before Hasselbeck was drafted by Green Bay......

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Why on earth did you change the "re" to baddog????

Knight_Of_Brown #515984 08/01/10 10:08 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 348
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 348
Quote:

I am just hoping Jake can be a mid-80's to low 90 rated QB for a year or two

that way it keeps McCoy on the bench and gives him some time to develop...




That kind of rating would be a welcome change from what we are used to. We'd be fine with that as I expect us to be able to run the ball.
If Jake can throw more TDs than picks that would be nice, too. We know he can be a solid QB who can get the ball where it needs to go.... most of the time.

As for McCoy, I am very cautiously optimistic. I don't expect much from him, and maybe that low expectation will lead us to being surprisingly happy. For a change.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

shepdawg #515985 08/01/10 10:15 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
K
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
Quote:

Holmgren was in Seattle before Hasselbeck was drafted by Green Bay......




Holmgren Drafted Hasselbeck in the 1998 NFL Draft (his last season in Green Bay)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_Green_Bay_Packers_season

He traded for Hasselback after leaving to go to Seattle

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
Quote:

Doesn't anybody find it ironic that Rip, the guy who coached those great QBs like Frye and Anderson, here in Cleveland screwed up a good QB?

When he was here, I remember reading what a good QB coach he was. Yet, our QBs were bad. Davidson was not a good OC either, though it was in a limited time here. And to add in Chud to the mix, I mean IMO that might be what happened to Jake.

The guy was successful until these "coaches" tried to change him. To me Scherer even seems to admit it. Good coaches try to use a players skills to their advantage, it seems like these guys try to make QBs change to fit their "system".

I always questioned how good a QB coach Scherer was. He never seemed to help our QBs. I think he coached Bernie at one point, but Kosar is a different animal.

I have some optimism as far as Jake is concerned. The two QBs we had last year, and the way Mangini couldn't commit to either showed me that they didn't possess the talent to be franchise QBs. Delhomme has already been one, and the above story makes me believe he will be again, if even only for a short time.




I was thinking the exact same thing, actually.

BADdog #515987 08/01/10 10:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 301
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 301
I'm not on anybody's bandwagon but Joe Thomas and Josh Cribbs. Everyone else has to produce wins. I don't care if we signed Peyton Manning, he would have to prove himself with wins for me to jump on his bandwagon.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 142
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 142
Quote:

Why on earth did you change the "re" to baddog????




Sorry about that. For some reason my computer always changes the re to my name. I have to cut and paste the original re every time I post. I forgot.


Joe Thomas #73
Knight_Of_Brown #515989 08/01/10 11:12 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Quote:

Quote:

Holmgren was in Seattle before Hasselbeck was drafted by Green Bay......




Holmgren Drafted Hasselbeck in the 1998 NFL Draft (his last season in Green Bay)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_Green_Bay_Packers_season

He traded for Hasselback after leaving to go to Seattle




Damned memory again. Thanks for correcting my correction.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Quote:

Quote:

Why on earth did you change the "re" to baddog????




Sorry about that. For some reason my computer always changes the re to my name. I have to cut and paste the original re every time I post. I forgot.




Wow. That's odd!

BADdog #515991 08/01/10 02:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 249
E
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
E
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 249
I'm on the bandwagon. I believe in Jake Delhomme and I'm just as ready to eat my words should he falter this season. I fully believe that Jake is an improvement over both of the QB's we played last season. I think he's more talented, and I believe that his experience will benefit our young team in more ways than just improved offensive output.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,412
Likes: 463
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,412
Likes: 463
Quote:

Quote:

Why on earth did you change the "re" to baddog????




Sorry about that. For some reason my computer always changes the re to my name. I have to cut and paste the original re every time I post. I forgot.




Sounds like an autofill program gone awry.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,163
Likes: 845
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,163
Likes: 845
Aye, I've seen/heard of it happening with a few people. My guess is the same... that it is the browser's auto-complete personal data settings.... but that can be addressed some place other than Pure Football.


I'm on the bandwagon as well. I initially poo-poo'd the signing, thinking that he was the veteran backup with us looking more at Wallace or someone else as the starter.
I've since come around on the idea and I think that he's going to - at least - do Ok for us. He doesn't need to be All-World, or "Elite"... he just needs to be Average. Good Enough.

If he does that, and I think we'll have a line and running game to give him lots of support in doing that, then I think we're gonna have an offense capable of getting us to .500 ball.
From there, it all rests on our secondary.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 144
T
1st String
Offline
1st String
T
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 144
This article ran in our paper this morning, too. I gotta admit, I wasn't too happy when I heard that we had signed Jake, given his age and how he played the last season and a half. Having read the article, his recent play makes sense. I'm thinking that if Robiske and Massoquoi step it up another notch or 2, maybe we will not be too bad.


[color:"green"] Education is when you read the fine print; experience is what you get when you don't.[/color]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 658
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 658
I am hopeful. But somewhere in the back of my mind the name Mark Rypien echoes.


Thomas - The Tank Engine
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Scootch over, I'm officially on the wagon too. Hated both signings of Wallace & Jake, but I'm happy with everything I've heard so far, the pressers, camp reports, etc. We just need a leader who can get the ball to the receivers over the next year or two. Hopefully Jake brings that and Wallace makes a suitable back-up.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Likes: 12
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,849
Likes: 12
I'll say I'm on the bandwagon after a Game 1 win...


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,412
Likes: 463
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,412
Likes: 463
And we have some people who will still take a wait and see attitude if he goes 19-0 and wins the Super Bowl.

I can hear it now ....... "Well, that's all well and good, but let's see how he does next year ...."

I do think that Delhomme gives us the best QB we've had since we came back. I'm not sure whether that is a ringing endorsement of his abilities, or a damning of everyone else who has taken snaps for us.

I expect "average" type play out of Delhomme this year. That would be far better than most of what we've seen at QB in Cleveland.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
JD could be WORSE than last year & we'd still be ahead at QB. Just on Leadership & experience alone.


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
I'm not buying into all the optimism. Rip wasn't out there throwing into double coverage. How does any of this explain all the fumbles Jake had? Jake was HORRIBLE last year, everyone but Browns fans thinks this guys arm is SHOT. I was watching some TC stuff and with no pass rush I was watching throws in the dirt, which says to me his arm is shot.

Now, while he cannot be worse than that cluster mess that was Quinn/Anderson....I certainly do not expect him to be THAT much better.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,163
Likes: 845
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,163
Likes: 845
I watched some of the TC vids on the main site, and almost without exception, the passes were all right where they should be. Balls were hitting receivers right in the bread basket, and on the run.
His throwing motion looked funny to me at first, but hey, if it works for him, so be it.... his throws were all looking MUCH better than anything we saw from Quinn/Anderson.



I certainly do not expect a Peyton Manning-esque season from Delhomme, nor do I really expect him to have anything that resembles his best years.... but if you simply average his career and give us that, that will be plenty enough to give us an enjoyable season.

He isn't here to be a savior or the answer to anything other than "now". He is here to give us one or two quality/acceptable seasons while we get a more long term solution into place.

Make no mistake - we're NOT making the playoffs this year, but it's going to be a far more enjoyable season than last one.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 142
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 142
Quote:

Make no mistake - we're NOT making the playoffs this year, but it's going to be a far more enjoyable season than last one.





I hope we make that mistake


Joe Thomas #73
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 87
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 87
Quote:

I watched some of the TC vids on the main site, and almost without exception, the passes were all right where they should be. Balls were hitting receivers right in the bread basket, and on the run.
His throwing motion looked funny to me at first, but hey, if it works for him, so be it.... his throws were all looking MUCH better than anything we saw from Quinn/Anderson.



I certainly do not expect a Peyton Manning-esque season from Delhomme, nor do I really expect him to have anything that resembles his best years.... but if you simply average his career and give us that, that will be plenty enough to give us an enjoyable season.

He isn't here to be a savior or the answer to anything other than "now". He is here to give us one or two quality/acceptable seasons while we get a more long term solution into place.

Make no mistake - we're NOT making the playoffs this year, but it's going to be a far more enjoyable season than last one.




True.....we don't need Delhomme to be a savior.
We need someone who can manage the game and keep the defense somewhat honest.

You folks no as well as I do that high school QB's execute their offense better then DA or BQ did for us last year.

We all know he is a stop gap @ QB, but inspiring a winning attitude around here is as important as finding a long term QB imo.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,412
Likes: 463
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,412
Likes: 463
I expect Delhomme to put up numbers along the lines of 18-22 TD and 10-13 INT.

This might be slightly optimistic on my part, but who knows...... if we can run the ball and play a little defense ..... we could surprise a few people here and there......


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
I expect around 7-9 TOs by Delhomme in the first 3 games. Doubt he is still our QB by the bye week.


"The medium for the bad news was ESPN, which figured. The network represents much of what is loud, obnoxious and empty in sports today."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
Quote:

We need someone who can manage the game and keep the defense somewhat honest.





Jake delhomme has never been a game manager, that's the point. He has ALWAYS been a gun slinger.....we tried to change Anderson and make him a game manager and that went about as badly as it could. What gives anyone confidence that Jake Delhomme with a potentially shot arm can go from gun slinger to game manager?

I am hopeful, but realistic. Game manager he is not.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Likes: 280
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Likes: 280
Quote:

I expect around 7-9 TOs by Delhomme in the first 3 games. Doubt he is still our QB by the bye week.



Given that our first two games are against Tampa Bay and KC, if he has that many in the first 3 games then that is a really bad sign for our running game..


yebat' Putin
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
Thats true, didn't take that into consideration. I just have zero expectations for Delhomme, I think he is done. This move screams Dilfer to me, and he was about the worst QB I have see play for us (not counting DA here).


"The medium for the bad news was ESPN, which figured. The network represents much of what is loud, obnoxious and empty in sports today."
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Jake Delhomme unlikely to have repeat of disastrous 2009 season

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5