Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,458
T
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,458
I have been trying to narrow down the roster over the last couple days and figure out who is staying and who is getting the boot...as well as who is going to find themselves manning the practice squad.

I think that it will end up something like this....

OL: Lauvao, Thomas, Steiny, Pashos, Womack, Mack, St. Clair, Yates

DL: Coleman, Rubin, Smith, Rogers, Mosley, Shaefering, Geathers.

TE: Moore, Watson, Royal

WR: Cribbs, Massa, Robiskie, Stuckey, Mitchell

RB: Davis, Hardesty, Harrison, Hillis, Vickers

QB: McCoy, Delhomme, Wallace

DB: Adams, Brown, Elam, Haden, Wright, Ward, Assante, Mcdonald, Ventrone

LB: Benard, Bowens, Costanzo, Fujita, Gocong, DQ, Roth, Trusnick, Maiava, Veikune

LS: Pontbriand

K: Dawson

P: Zastudil

I think depending on injury, and how the coaches decide on the bottom of the roster, there are a few guys who aren't PS eligible who may find their way on the final 53.

Punter Reggie Hodges certainly has a shot if Zastudil can't get healthy.

Sorenson's value at safety may overshadow Ventrones value on ST.

OL Kooistra and Fanaika have the chance to overtake either St. Claire or Yates on the depth chart.

And finally, Syndric Steptoe could make his way onto the roster if they decide to add another receiver to the mix instead of carrying so many db's and lb's.


Then as for the practice squad---where I think you can hold 8 players?

1. PS Haggerty, Johnathan WR
2. PS Reinders, Joel OL
3. PS Danso, Kwaku DL
4. PS Francies, Coye DB
5. *PS Miller, Swanson DT / Brown, Titus LB
6. *PS Gamble, Joel TE
7. *PS Chancellor, Chris DB / Smith, DeAngelo DB

* These guys aren't guaranteed to be placed on the PS, the powers that be might just cut them outright to make room for other prospects to sign to the PS.

This would leave the following players cut:

Bowie, John DB
Engram, Bobby WR
Jennings, Chris RB
Murray, Pat OL
Lawson, Gerard DB
Ratliff, Brett QB
Robinson, Derreck DL
Sanford, Brian DL
Smith, Alex TE

What do you guys think? Especially these guys on the bubble---who stays, who goes?


I wish to wash my Irish wristwatch......
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 238
C
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 238
I did essentially the same thing tonight. I have 3 differences:

1. Cut Yates, Keep Fanaika.
2. Cut Maiava, Keep Allen.
3. Cut Royal, Keep Smith.

I see DB and LB as the spots with the most "interesting" cuts. Sorensen is a probably my last cut. Ventrone's ST contributions got him kept, but could see that being flipped because Sorensen isn't a bad ST player himself.

Yates, Fanaika. Fanaika, Yates. Does it really matter? If either plays, we're pretty much screwed anyway, but you got to have at least 8 Oline.

I think we keep the extra WR, because it's odd to go into the year with only 5 WR. Wouldn't surprise me, but it seems a low number, especially when 1 is Cribbs who is so important in other roles. So someone had to go and Maiava was the odd man out IMO.

Lastly, Royal v. Smith. If Smith proves he can block decently, he has a shot. Haven't seen much of him, but I know Royal's Dlineman's hands don't help his case. Maybe this is wishful thinking on my part. If Watson and Moore were better blockers, probably would have only kept 2 TEs because of Peyton Hillis playing an H-Back type role.

Getting the roster to 64, IMO is pretty easy. Those last 11 cuts get dicey. And we'll probably have some injuries that clear this up a bit more. Hopefully it's those guys on the margin not at the top.


Original Dawg Talkers Pick'ems Champion
2008
2010


Dawg Talk Member Since: 08/24/01
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,841
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,841
Eric Barton would not make the team either.

I would not be surprised if St Clair did not make the team, in favor of a younger player with better upside.


Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!…. That did not age well.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,458
T
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,458
Yea, I had him listed as one of the cuts...must've forgot to list him there.

I think he will end up either retiring, being cut, or taking some kind of injury settlement.

I just don't see him coming back.


I wish to wash my Irish wristwatch......
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Why didn't you just ask for players who are likely not to make the team or are likely to make the team that ould be a suprise to those who will read this.

I could see Brian Robiskie wr, and James Davis rb, both getting cut and that would be a surprise. I could see them both making the team also.

I could see a reason to cut Eric Steinbach og, and Robert Royal te, and that would be a surprise to alot of people.

I think it would be a surprise if Haggerty, Mitchell, and Steptoe, all made the team, but I could see it happening.

I could see a case where 1 of the 3 db's drafted this year doesn't do enough to make the team, even though they were such draft picks that it would be a surprise.

I'm pretty confident this team is better with St Clair than without him even if he doesn't start behind Pashos and Thomas, because he is the only other reliable tackle on the outside and he, St Clair, can play outside of the others for a 6 man line.
The team is better with St Clair but that hasn't stopped them from cutting someone before.

I think Engram defintly makes this team, He is the 3rd best receiver behind Mo Mass and Stuckey.

I think they will use more of "not receivers" as receivers this year, for instance

Evan Moore, not a receiver
Josh Cribbs, not a receiver
Jerome Harrison, not a receiver

These will line up as receivers, they are going to have to just to get the best players on the field.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
Quote:

I could see Brian Robiskie wr ... ... getting cut and that would be a surprise.


Based on the reports comingo ut of camp...that wouldn't be a surprise...that would be an A-Bomb going off in the city of Cleveland....


I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...

What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,489
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,489
Glad to see he thinks so little of our WR corps that he could see our #1/#2 WR being cut and our "starting" WRs being a TE a RB and a KR.

Of course it all makes sense after reading his vitriol spilled toward the FO for having the gall to actually draft defense with our first 2 picks I mean, he's so upset at the amount of money we paid to Haden (the man plays DEFENSE!) that I'm surprised he doesn't think the FO is going to cut half the team and replace them with circus chimps.


[Linked Image]

Fear us, for we are the BROWNS, led by the mighty BM! Only in Cleveland.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Quote:

2. Cut Maiava, Keep Allen.






It would make no sense to cut Maiava. He is one our better special teamers and can play all the linebacker positions.Especially to keep a WR who is probably 7th or 8th on the depth chart (Massaquoi, Robiske, Stuckey, Cribbs, Steptoe, Mitchell, Haggerty).

No way Maiava gets cut.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 605
R
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 605
dont forget Engram


"He who buys what he does not need steals from himself."
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
camp cuts could be a factor, but I doubt it will be as great a factor as in years past. We * appear* to have better quality at the bottom of the roster.

I think we carry 9 OL on the roster.Pardon me if this is a re-hash of older posts,and some of this is just a no-brainer.Prediction......

LT - Thomas
LG - Steinbach
C - Mack
RG - Womack (plays RT tackle at times)
RT- Pashos

back-ups:

RT/LT - St.Clair
C/G - Lauvao
G: Kooistra
G/T: Fanaika

cut:
Yates, gets picked by another team
Murray

PS
Reinders
Bender

Since Reinders is in a boot there is a chance he is "stashed" on IR for the rest of the season.

Bubble>
Kooistra, Fanaika and Yates are really the players on the bubble. Three players fighting for two positions. Yates and Kooistra are not PS eligible.
If a camp cut is added it's here. DUH.........
Realistically it will be hard to find a camp cut that is an improvement on any of our current back-up OL.

I'm not a big Steinbach fan, but some of the DTers are starting to win me over.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
I think we are on the same page here.

Very similar to my preliminary roster, with exception to Koostra over Yates, but I am leaning to the side of Yates, for no other reason then the lack of a back-up Center.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,960
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,960
i hear josh cribbs is on the bubble

no, I cant let it go


President - Fort Collins Browns Backers
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,955
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,955
Here is the semi official and partially authenticated YTown roster prediction:

QB: Delhomme, Wallace, McCoy (3)
RB: Hardesty, Harrison, Hillis, Davis (4)
FB: Vickers (1)
TE: Watson, Moore, Royals (3)
WR: Massaquoi, Robiske, Stuckey, Cribbs, Someone not currently on the roster (I just don't see any of our other current WRs making the regular season roster) (5)
OL: Thomas, Steinbach, Mack, Lauvoa, Womack, Yates, St. Clair, Kooistra (Pashos could take St Clair's spot except that he hasn't been healthy yet) (8)


DL: R.Smith, Rogers, Rubin, Moseley, Schaefering, Robinson, Geathers (7)
LB: Roth, Fujita, Gocong, Benard, Costanzo, Maiva, Trusnic, and 1 other. That other could be Bowens, Barton, Veikune, or Brown ..... no idea what way they go. Forced to guess, I pick Bowens. (8)
S: Elam, Ward, Assante, Adams, Ventrone (5)
CB: Brown, Wright, Haden, McDonald, Either Francies or a late roster cut. (5)

ST: Dawson, Pontbriand, Hodges

That leaves 2 spots. Maybe an extra DL sneaks in here to help cover suspensions. Maybe Ratliffe makes it for a few weeks into the season as the 4th QB. (not out of the question if there are still major concerns about McCoy) Maybe another DB makes it. Could be that we carry an extra OL until all of the injury issues are sorted out. Hard to tell at this point.




Practice Squad?

Probably LB Titus Brown if he is eligible. (and I'm not going to bother checking at this point)
2 DL Probably Swanson Miller and Brian Sanford
Maybe a CB like Chancellor
WR Mitchell ... man he needs a LOT of work
OL Reinders, Bender, or Malecki

Probably 1 more DB.


That's the way my crystal ball sees it.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,391
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,391
Did you purposely leave out DQ or was that an oversight? I agree with Bowens being one of your (8).

Shoot, I agree with every one of your choices except I would add Coleman as a DL. (8) is more than enough DL...but with pending/possible suspensions and injuries to Mosely and Rogers...???

I think Pashos makes the team along with the guys you mentioned - including St Clair. Too many injuries along the line to start the year with only (8) guys on OL. So...there goes the (2) remaining spots. (To Pashos & Coleman)

I think Davis played his way on to the team over Veikune. (I know they play different positions...it's all about special teams.)

I previously thought Mitchell was in...until I actually saw him play a little. Raw is an understatement. I agree that our 5th WR is not presently on our roster.

That leaves out guys like:

Alex Smith
Sorenson
T Brown
Engram
Veikune
Barton
DQ
Jennings
Lawson
S Miller
B Sanford
Ratliff

So...if we are trying to make room for one or two of the above cuts...where does the spot(s) come from?

I think the bubble guys on your/my roster are the last guys in line at OL, DL, RB (simply due to numbers), and S. So...here are the last guys at their positions thereby putting them on the bubble:

OL - Pashos. He hasn't played and hardly practiced. With Womack out until the reg season, St Clair dinged, & Lauvao in Hawaii...I would conclude that IF an extra spot MUST come from our list of OL...that cut would be Pashos. I think this is the least likely cut.

DL - Geathers. Robinson has been too good to cut. Geathers is raw but a guy I like. If Mosely stays on PUP, we gain a little temporary roster relief...but unfortunately at a position with many question marks. I can really see Mosely start the year on PUP. If the suspensions are non-game suspensions, I thnk Geathers gets cut and we try and stash him on the PS. I think this/these are the most likely options IF we are looking to keep one of the listed cut guys.

RB - I think Davis is last on the RB list. (Unless Hardesty goes to IR...hope not.) Unfortunately, it is a numbers game for Davis. I think it boils down to a 9th LB or 5th RB. As I said above, I think he makes the team. I think cutting Davis is the least likely option.

S - Ventrone is last...you want him or Sorenson?

Thoughts:

I think the heartburn is over how to keep T Brown.

I won't be surprised if we try and keep A Smith...yes 4 TEs.

The ST coach will want Sorenson.

EM will want Veikune.

I wonder if some people now see my point in why DQ is a probale cut/trade? (Who do you cut to keep him? Especially not knowing when/if he will return this year.)

I think the small dilema in who to keep....means we are finally getting a better roster with which to compete.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
It's too bad for some guys, but this is "The Truth" --

Quote:

I think the small dilema in who to keep....means we are finally getting a better roster with which to compete.





Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,955
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,955
Actually, I forgot about DQ ..... and I think it's entirely possible that he could be traded.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
1.1:

QB -- (3)
Jake Delhomme
Seneca Wallace
Colt McCoy

RB/FB -- (5)
Jerome Harrison
Lawrence Vickers
Payton Hillis
Montario Hardesty
James Davis

TE -- (4)
Ben Watson
Even Moore (#5WR)
Robert Royal
Alex Smith

WR -- (4)
Mohamed Massaquoi
Brian Robiskie
Chansi Stuckey
Joshua Cribbs

OL -- (9)
Joe Thomas
Eric Steinbach
Alex Mac
Shawn Lauvao
Floyd Womack
Tony Pashos
John St. Clair
Billy Yates
Scott Kooistra

Kicker -- (1)
Phil Dawson

LS -- (1)
Ryan Pontbaind

DL -- (7)
Shaun Rogers
Robaire Smith
Ahtyba Rubin
Brian Schaefering
Kenyon Coleman
CJ Mosley
Derreck Robinson

LB -- (9)
Matt Roth
Marcus Benard
Chris Gocong
Scott Fujita
D'Qwell Jackson
Jason Trusnik
David Bowens
Blake Costanzo
Kaluka Maiava

DB -- (9)
Joe Haden
Eric Wright
Sheldon Brown
TJ Ward
Mike Adams
Larry Asante
Abram Elam
Brandon McDonald
Ray Ventrone

Punter -- (1)
Reggie Hodges


[Linked Image]

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Some tough calls,...

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:

Some tough calls,...




Yes there are,..... I am thinking that we will have to retain an extra OL (Kooistra) until we know for sure Womack will be ready to go and this will impact another position, most likely DB (Sorensen).

I see no reason to keep Veikune and Mitchell around on the 53 man roster or Geathers for that matter.
They are PS material at this point.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Hate to give up on Veikune and endure the subsequent "draft pick backlash," but he doesn't appear to have the wherewithal of Trusnik and Maiava. And I don't - despite the idle chatter - see the Browns trading D'Qwell to make the hole either.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
I do not foresee a problem getting them on our PS, because none of the above mentioned players are NFL ready. There is always a chance of some other team claiming them, but at this point they are merely prospects.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Do you have to clear waivers to get placed on the PS ? If so, I would say, that's not a very fair labor practice,...but I'm no attorney.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:

Do you have to clear waivers to get placed on the PS ? If so, I would say, that's not a very fair labor practice,...but I'm no attorney.




Well I am no mouth peace either, but I be leave that is the process.
If you cut a player, then I would think that the cutting team would then lose all rights to that player.

By waiving a player and if they are not claimed by another team and clear waivers then the team keeps the rights to that player and then the player is given a new (reduced) contract in most cases.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,955
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,955
Quote:

Do you have to clear waivers to get placed on the PS ? If so, I would say, that's not a very fair labor practice,...but I'm no attorney.




Yes. Players are waived, and those who clear waivers can be re-signed to the practice squad.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,391
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,391
I like that roster...but with T Brown replacing DQ.

I think we keep a 4th TE over a raw or old WR at this point.

If Mosely starts the year on PUP, choose between DQ & Veikune.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:

I like that roster...but with T Brown replacing DQ.

I think we keep a 4th TE over a raw or old WR at this point.

If Mosley starts the year on PUP, choose between DQ & Veikune.




There are still some big if's.

Certainly if Mosley is to start the season on the PUP will free up a roster spot while still retaining him for later in the season.
Womack is a big question and could force the team to have to use a roster spot until he is ready to go. We hope that will be prior to the final cuts.

I do like what T Brown has shown albeit in garbage time.
I think he and Veikune are on the bubble.
Both I think are eligible for the PS too. Yes it is a risky call, but sometimes you need a little luck.

I can't speculate on weather DQ will be traded. He has lead this team in tackles before with lesser talent around him.
I have to think we are still a stronger team with,..... than without DQ on our roster right now.

Still every year there is someone who gets cut and you kinda scratch your head in disbelief.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Quote:

Still every year there is someone who gets cut and you kinda scratch your head in disbelief.




Politics,...it's THERE.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
QB: Delhomme, Wallace, McCoy (3)

RB: Harrison, Hardesty, Davis (3)

FB: Vickers, Hillis (2)

TE: Watson, Moore, Royal (3)

WR: Massoqua, Robiskie, Stuckey, Mitchell (4)

OL: Thomas, Steiny, Mack, Womack, Pashos, Lauvao, St. Clair, Yates (8)

DL: Rogers, Rubin, Smith, Mosley, Coleman, Geathers, Shaefering (7)

LB: Roth, Bowens, Fujita, Gocong, Jackson, Benard, Veikune, (7)

CB: Brown, Wright, Haden, McDonald, Sorensen (5)

S: Ward, Adams, Elam, Assante (4)

ST: Cribbs, Dawson, Hodges, Pontbriand, Costanzo, Trusnick, Ventrone (7)

I REALLY wanna get rid of Elam, but that will never happen... Heck we probably won't even get rid of Barton... Stupid Vets...


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Jason Trusnik, I think is more than just a ST guy.
I consider him one of our top 6 LB's. Veikune is eligible for the PS, Maiava is not and is a better a ST player so this is why I put him ahead of Veikune.

I don't automatically give a late round draft pick a free pass over players we may need early in the season.....ie; pending suspensions with 2 of our starting DL.
Okay, now all of a sudden your #7 is your #5 DL and will have to figure in the rotation.
I don't know if the Coach's feel that Geathers will be ready for saw mill so soon.
If Mosley is not ready to come off the PUP this could be a moot point and a Rookie will have to be put to the saw mill.

It's still premature, but Heckert has some tough choices a head of him.

Btw, why did you put Sorensen @ CB?


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,061
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,061
Quote:

I like that roster...but with T Brown replacing DQ.

I think we keep a 4th TE over a raw or old WR at this point.

If Mosely starts the year on PUP, choose between DQ & Veikune.




What do you do with DQ?


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,391
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,391
Quote:

Quote:

I like that roster...but with T Brown replacing DQ.

I think we keep a 4th TE over a raw or old WR at this point.

If Mosely starts the year on PUP, choose between DQ & Veikune.




What do you do with DQ?




IR/Trade/Cut

In my mind, it has always broken down to keeping DQ - who is unhappy, unhealthy, undersized and who was completely NOT missed last year - versus keeping a younger guy with the right size and/or versatility to play in our scheme. (T Brown, Veikune)

Then DQ was injured again...time to move on.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,557
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,557
QB Delhomme, Wallace, McCoy =3
FB Vickers =1
RB Harrison, Hillis, Hardesty, Davis =4
WR Mo, Robo, Stuck, Cribbs, Mitchel l=5
TE Watson, Royal, Moore, Smith=4
OL Thomas, Steiny, Mack, Lauvao, St. Claire plus 3 to be added =8

ST Dawson, Pontibriand, plus punter yet to be added and yet to be earned spot =4

DL Rogers, Rubin, Robaire, Schaeffering, Geathers, Coleman =6
LB Benard, Fujita, Gocong, Roth, Maiava, Trusnik, Costanza, Bowens, Veikune, Brown, plus one to be added =11
S Elam, Asante, Ward, Adams =4
CB Wright, Haden, Brown, McDonald =4

DQ pup maybe IR
Barton cut
Porkchop likely IR
Pashos can see an injury settlement coming
Hodges replaced by waiver wire

I think we will see trades happening soon as teams deep at one position try to cash in before they have to cut. This is a good week for it.

Last edited by Mourgrym; 08/23/10 10:02 AM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,732
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,732
Pashos is supposed to practice on Tuesday, at least that's what he told the media in an article I read last night.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

Quote:


What do you do with DQ?




IR/Trade/Cut

In my mind, it has always broken down to keeping DQ - who is unhappy, unhealthy, undersized and who was completely NOT missed last year - versus keeping a younger guy with the right size and/or versatility to play in our scheme. (T Brown, Veikune)

Then DQ was injured again...time to move on.




I disagree. The one thing our LB corps severely lacks right now is speed. DQ has his deficiencies, but he has speed.

Until we replace that component, I think he has an important role with this team.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,391
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,391
j/c

I have a feeling Veikune makes the team. Mangini won't be willing to give up on a second round pick so quickly despite what all of us think about him so far. It'll be an ego/stubborn thing.

That might put Maiava out.

I think it'll all depend on how much say Holmgrem has on the final roster. He has no ties to DV.


------------------------------
*In Baker we trust*
-------------------------------
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,388
I doubt Maivia is the one gone. I hope its Barton and Veikune.


"The medium for the bad news was ESPN, which figured. The network represents much of what is loud, obnoxious and empty in sports today."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,557
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,557
we will carry 11 or 12 linebackers and they like using him as a DE so he has a good shot.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Yeah, that's the "tweener" factor,...

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Quote:

Jason Trusnik, I think is more than just a ST guy.
I consider him one of our top 6 LB's. Veikune is eligible for the PS, Maiava is not and is a better a ST player so this is why I put him ahead of Veikune.

I don't automatically give a late round draft pick a free pass over players we may need early in the season.....ie; pending suspensions with 2 of our starting DL.
Okay, now all of a sudden your #7 is your #5 DL and will have to figure in the rotation.
I don't know if the Coach's feel that Geathers will be ready for saw mill so soon.
If Mosley is not ready to come off the PUP this could be a moot point and a Rookie will have to be put to the saw mill.

It's still premature, but Heckert has some tough choices a head of him.

Btw, why did you put Sorensen @ CB?




I'm pretty sure all of our LBs will play LB at some point, I wouldn't put it past Ryan and Mangini to run a 1-6-5 Defense... I think they have already actually...

Veikune is a weird situation, for somone who has done absolutley NOTHING, it seems like he'll almost NOT be cut, even though guys like Maiva have actually shown SHOMETHING, not much... but still...

Just think, If we rearanged our 2nd round picks that year, we could have possibly come away with MoMass, Robiskie, AND Malaluga... *sigh*

With guys like Cribbs and Moore, we may not NEED Mitchell, If he makes it to the PS thats great, I dunno if he does...

Is there any team out there that NEEDS D'Qell and can give us something we can use this year in return? That'd be nice...

I started listing all DBs, then changed it to seperate Corners and Safeties, Forgot to move Ventrone...

HANK POTEAT ISN'T ON OUR ROSTER THIS YEAR!!!


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,552
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,552
Quote:

j/c

I have a feeling Veikune makes the team. Mangini won't be willing to give up on a second round pick so quickly despite what all of us think about him so far. It'll be an ego/stubborn thing.

That might put Maiava out.

I think it'll all depend on how much say Holmgrem has on the final roster. He has no ties to DV.




I don't see Mangini being ego driven about who stays and who doesn't. Besides, Heckert has final control of the roster.. Mangini has input,,but Heckert calls the shots..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Who are your final 53 and PS players?

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5