Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#541012 11/03/10 08:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
I have not been following politics lately as I have been busy enjoying life during this beautiful autumn, so when voting yesterday, I must admit to not being the most informed voter as to what was going to be on the ballot.

While voting, I noticed that "tea party" candidates were listed separately from Republicans. I was under the impression that tea partiers "were" Republicans.

It is going to be interesting to watch these "tea party" representatives morph into Republicans and walk in lockstep as they adopt the GOP/George W. Bush agenda of...tax cuts for the rich..outsourcing jobs...and more wars.



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
What candidates were listed under the Tea Party? Where I live in Ohio there nobody on the ballot listed as a Tea Party Party.


#gmstrong
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
i am not a republican or a tea partier but i am very put off by your immaturity and your sentiment. if you haven't been following politics, then why try to assume you know what they are about? that's not a sign of an intelligent, mature person.

and in the words of ytownbrownsfan, i say

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,133
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,133
Quote:

I have not been following politics lately as I have been busy enjoying life during this beautiful autumn, so when voting yesterday, I must admit to not being the most informed voter as to what was going to be on the ballot.

While voting, I noticed that "tea party" candidates were listed separately from Republicans. I was under the impression that tea partiers "were" Republicans.

It is going to be interesting to watch these "tea party" representatives morph into Republicans and walk in lockstep as they adopt the GOP/George W. Bush agenda of...tax cuts for the rich..outsourcing jobs...and more wars.





LOL at the sour grapes. If what you say happens, me thinks they will be held accountable. Their position is not one of strength just yet. The republicans will be under the watchful eyes of those that voted for them, and there are a bunch of ticked off liberal media types just waiting for them to do something hypocritical to their campaign platforms. They were elected because the dems screwed the pooch. If the newly elected resort to the same ignorant spending policies, they will be voted out as quickly as the dems were. I know that's what you're hoping for, as your party let you down in a huge way.....though you don't have the cajones to admit it.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,230
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,230
Quote:

I have not been following politics lately as I have been busy enjoying life during this beautiful autumn, so when voting yesterday, I must admit to not being the most informed voter as to what was going to be on the ballot.

While voting, I noticed that "tea party" candidates were listed separately from Republicans. I was under the impression that tea partiers "were" Republicans.

It is going to be interesting to watch these "tea party" representatives morph into Republicans and walk in lockstep as they adopt the GOP/George W. Bush agenda of...tax cuts for the rich..outsourcing jobs...and more wars.






Don't you know that is all right-winger ever do?

Taxcuts for the rich, lowering minimum wage, outsourcing jobs, and destroying anything they touch.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Quote:

What candidates were listed under the Tea Party? Where I live in Ohio there nobody on the ballot listed as a Tea Party Party.




There were none that I know of. There were none in Youngstown.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Charlie - The Republican Party favors a right-wing stance, limited central government, and tough, interventionist foreign policy - to be exact.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,133
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,133
Quote:

Don't you know that is all right-winger ever do?

Taxcuts for the rich, lowering minimum wage, outsourcing jobs, and destroying anything they touch.




Says the guy that chooses not to work and wants healthcare and a college education paid for by others.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Quote:

Quote:

What candidates were listed under the Tea Party? Where I live in Ohio there nobody on the ballot listed as a Tea Party Party.




There were none that I know of. There were none in Youngstown.




none in Warren

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Quote:

Quote:

Don't you know that is all right-winger ever do?

Taxcuts for the rich, lowering minimum wage, outsourcing jobs, and destroying anything they touch.




Says the guy that chooses not to work and wants healthcare and a college education paid for by others.




Great deal if you're the guy who pays for none of it ......

Of course, Charlie is slaving away working that tough 4-6 days per month schedule ......


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
Didn't see any candidates listed as "Tea Party" candidates on my ballot either. Poor mac...


[color:"white"]"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."

-- Mark Twain [/color]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,642
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,642
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

What candidates were listed under the Tea Party? Where I live in Ohio there nobody on the ballot listed as a Tea Party Party.




There were none that I know of. There were none in Youngstown.




none in Warren




None in Akron either.


[Linked Image from i75.photobucket.com]

#gmstrong
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
maybe the Tea Partiers were masquerading as Democrats ... ala the original Tea Partiers (Sons of Liberty) when they dressed as Indians ... and they were just trying to trick MAC into voting for them

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
There were no state or national candidates that won an election. There were Tea Party backed candidates but that would not be on any ballot. His statement leads me to wonder if he voted.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
I didn't see any Tea Party candidates on my ballot.

I did see socialists and libertarians as well as the green party.

But, in the end, I just want what's best for this country AS A WHOLE. I want all people, black, white, male, female, gay, straight to be able to achieve the best and most they can.

I don't believe that the GOP can do that. But, then again, I'm not real sure that my Democratic party can, either. Frankly, I'm not sure either of them WANT that. It's much easier to just placate people with words and money, but not really better their lives.

JMHO


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
When has minimum wage EVER been lowered?????

You know what???? Here is the thing that irks me about minimum wage....

Democrats support minimum wage increases.....all of the time...they are ALWAYS trying to increase it. And I am in favor of having a set minimum wage. You need to limit some predatory practices of businesses that would not act in ethical ways.

However....One of the reasons the Democrats are continually trying to increase minimum wage is that it does not provide a sustainable income to live off of. So minimum wage is increased...yay!!!.....And then what do the Democrats do???? They support inflationary policies that make that minimum wage even more unsustainable.....It is a vicious cycle and it DOES NOT WORK.

Should minimum wage be lower???? Not at these current inflated levels for the cost of living...but if we can regain control of inflation and the cost of living...then yes...maybe it should come down and help businesses hire more people.


I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...

What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

What candidates were listed under the Tea Party? Where I live in Ohio there nobody on the ballot listed as a Tea Party Party.




There were none that I know of. There were none in Youngstown.




none in Warren




None in Akron either.




None here either. Maybe we all got bad ballots?

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
the minimum wage is a joke anyway. there should be no such thing as a minimum wage. you should be paid what you are worth. once the minimum wage goes up, other job wages go down so a company can deal with the increased wages of its janitors, part timers, and general labor. it's not a good system

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
I think people are having trouble understanding this ... so I translated for the rest of the board ...

Quote:

I have not been following politics lately as I have been busy enjoying life during this beautiful autumn,



My internet has been having problems this weekend so I haven't been able to read the huffingtonpost and dailykos lately to tell me what I need to say.

Quote:

so when voting yesterday, I must admit to not being the most informed voter as to what was going to be on the ballot.



I'm your typical Liberal.

Quote:

While voting, I noticed that "tea party" candidates were listed separately from Republicans. I was under the impression that tea partiers "were" Republicans.



On my union supplied ballot, tea party candidates were marked seperately and further away from the regular options, so one wouldn't accidently poke a hole in he wrong spot.

Quote:

It is going to be interesting to watch these "tea party" representatives morph into Republicans and walk in lockstep as they adopt the GOP/George W. Bush agenda of...tax cuts for the rich..outsourcing jobs...and more wars.




It's going to be interesting finding new ways to tie tea party representatives back to George W. Bush, because that's the only person I know how to blame things on. It's also difficult being a puppet for unions and the DNC because instead of hanging you from strings, they like to shove their hand up your backside.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887


[Linked Image from mypsn.eu.playstation.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
I 'll double that


I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...

What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
I didn't notice "TP or Tea Party" next to any names,, did I miss it..

I saw R or D or I..., I think I saw a couple of L's..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
that post made this thread bareable. hilarious.


#gmstrong
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 989
P
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
P
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 989
The News coverage was the ones who were labeling tea party. Not the Ballots. There is no tea party. It's part of the Republican party, they just gave them a name so we know who the nut jobs in the GOP are now. I like it ... makes it easier for me. I wish they would separate and have their own party so I can go back to liking the GOP.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 658
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 658
This is interesting, as I believe that the Tea Party is a political movement, rather than a political party. It is not unusual to see someone on the Democrat line and the Liberal line, or on the Republican line and the Conservative line. But both Liberal and Conservative are political parties, unlike the Tea Party.

Can you name one person that ran on the Tea Party line, or is this just a lie? If you can't recall anyone, please let me know your congressional district and I will find a sample ballot.

Thanks.


Thomas - The Tank Engine
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Quote:

i am not a republican or a tea partier but i am very put off by your immaturity and your sentiment. if you haven't been following politics, then why try to assume you know what they are about? that's not a sign of an intelligent, mature person.

and in the words of ytownbrownsfan, i say


'

Wow. I try to stay out of political threads, but I would have to use profanity to describe how you responsed to mac. I'm not so sure you should be calling anyone out on their maturity or intelligence.

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
You have proven exactly what this election is about. Accountability. Are we not to hold people accountable for their actions? You post something unintelligent, thoughtless, and immature ... you get called out for it. You pass unfavorable healthcare reform, increase the size of government and plunge this country further into debt ... you get called out for it. Accountability. I am sorry if you feel the need to use profanity, but there are many other words in the English language that might better articulate your feelings. Why not try a couple? Oh wait, did I cross the line of calling someone out again? I am sorry ... I will try to stop holding people accountable.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Quote:

Quote:

i am not a republican or a tea partier but i am very put off by your immaturity and your sentiment. if you haven't been following politics, then why try to assume you know what they are about? that's not a sign of an intelligent, mature person.

and in the words of ytownbrownsfan, i say


'

Wow. I try to stay out of political threads, but I would have to use profanity to describe how you responsed to mac. I'm not so sure you should be calling anyone out on their maturity or intelligence.




My suggestion is to go back and read some political threads. You might understand. Mac bring everything on himself the way he talks about others


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Quote:

You have proven exactly what this election is about. Accountability. Are we not to hold people accountable for their actions? You post something unintelligent, thoughtless, and immature ... you get called out for it. You pass unfavorable healthcare reform, increase the size of government and plunge this country further into debt ... you get called out for it. Accountability. I am sorry if you feel the need to use profanity, but there are many other words in the English language that might better articulate your feelings. Why not try a couple? Oh wait, did I cross the line of calling someone out again? I am sorry ... I will try to stop holding people accountable.




Step back just a little...

What if we hadn't bailed out GM, Chrysler and Banks and investment firms and AIG? What do you suppose would have happened?

I'm pretty much with you on the healthcare reform bill.. the thought and Idea were right, the plan and the execution weren't. So on this we agree.

Irrational hatrid from both sides didn't serve the people.. It only muddied the water and no ACTUAL work was done.

I only ask this because you talk about calling people out,, isn't it important to understand the alternatives to thier actions?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
thanks Daman for giving me perspective. I was on a serious verbal jaunt against Brownoholic and dragged the Dems in with me lol. I don't know what would have happened if we had not bailed out the auto companies. Maybe new auto companies would have sprouted up and people would have went to work there instead of at the same old companies with the same old outsourced factories. i'd seriously make a run at the other problems like health care and debt, but lunch is upon me.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

i am not a republican or a tea partier but i am very put off by your immaturity and your sentiment. if you haven't been following politics, then why try to assume you know what they are about? that's not a sign of an intelligent, mature person.

and in the words of ytownbrownsfan, i say


'

Wow. I try to stay out of political threads, but I would have to use profanity to describe how you responsed to mac. I'm not so sure you should be calling anyone out on their maturity or intelligence.




My suggestion is to go back and read some political threads. You might understand. Mac bring everything on himself the way he talks about others




So you were responded w/ a lot more tolerance at one point?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
Had to break this up a little as they were 2 separate moves so please excuse what seems to be taking things out of context....

Quote:

What if we hadn't bailed out GM, Chrysler ..........? What do you suppose would have happened?


The investors would have gotten the bankrupcy money instead of the Unions...afterall it was their money in the first place.... A new GM would still have been created or we would have seen a bunch of NEW smaller auto companies emerge from the pieces. (and possibly a lot more ideas and competition pushing things forward)

Quote:

What if we hadn't bailed out ...... Banks and investment firms and AIG? What do you suppose would have happened?


They would have been bought out by those Banks that were responsible and did not take a penny of the bailout money yet were going to be taxed as if they did....Those banks would beprospering quite a bit better than they are today and some of them may not have been bought out by some of the banks that did take bailout money.


I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...

What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
yes. There are very few liberal/Democrats that post in these threads. There are only two that I am done with. Mac and Charlie.

However in this thread I didn't attack him. I asked a question on what actual Tea Party candidates were on the ballot and won. I knew the answer and that it is zero when it relates to any office larger than dog catcher.

Everyone in these threads knows that Mac never answers questions. All he does is post articles from left wing blogs. people with the same point of view no this as well and do nothing to stand behind him.


#gmstrong
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Mac tries to pin everything negative on Bush just like Django/Knight of Brown tries to pin everything negative on Mangini. Only thing with Mac is that all he ever does is copy and paste crap from known left wing opinion columns

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,758
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,758
Quote:

There were no state or national candidates that won an election. There were Tea Party backed candidates but that would not be on any ballot. His statement leads me to wonder if he voted.


.

Rand Paul won..

But as far as the Tea Party goes.. It was a good thing until they got hijacked and morphed into what they are now.. The Tea Party we see now is not the Tea Party that was suppose to be.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"Don't be burdened by regrets or make your failures an obsession or become embittered or possessed by ruined hopes"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

i am not a republican or a tea partier but i am very put off by your immaturity and your sentiment. if you haven't been following politics, then why try to assume you know what they are about? that's not a sign of an intelligent, mature person.

and in the words of ytownbrownsfan, i say


'

Wow. I try to stay out of political threads, but I would have to use profanity to describe how you responsed to mac. I'm not so sure you should be calling anyone out on their maturity or intelligence.




My suggestion is to go back and read some political threads. You might understand. Mac bring everything on himself the way he talks about others





What I find insanely ironic is mac is the one that's constantly telling people "educate yourself. ", etc. Yet here he openly admits he didn't know the views of people, but he voted anyway.

Who'd you vote for mac? And why? Anybody with "democrat" behind their name, right?

Oh, and for the record, I voted for a few dem's myself. 2 of them. As did my wife.

One other observation here - NO ONE else saw "Tea Party", or "Tea" behind anyone's name - but we all saw "Republican", "Democrat", "Independent", or "Libertarian".

So mac - how did you see "Tea party"????????

Either you lied about voting, or you lied about seeing it, or you had a tainted ballot. Which is it? Come clean. We all anxiously await your reply about lying about voting, or lying about seeing Tea party. Unless, as someone mentioned, you got a ballot from work or where ever in which they marked the tea party guy for you.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Quote:

Quote:

There were no state or national candidates that won an election. There were Tea Party backed candidates but that would not be on any ballot. His statement leads me to wonder if he voted.


.

Rand Paul won..

But as far as the Tea Party goes.. It was a good thing until they got hijacked and morphed into what they are now.. The Tea Party we see now is not the Tea Party that was suppose to be.




Yes but he was a Republican on the ballot. The guy from Wisconsin was a Tea Party guy but he was listed as a Republican.

From what I gather their were a few more first time politicians that won. Florida governor was one of them.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Quote:

please excuse what seems to be taking things out of context....






You are excused

Quote:




Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What if we hadn't bailed out GM, Chrysler ..........? What do you suppose would have happened?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The investors would have gotten the bankrupcy money instead of the Unions...afterall it was their money in the first place.... A new GM would still have been created or we would have seen a bunch of NEW smaller auto companies emerge from the pieces. (and possibly a lot more ideas and competition pushing things forward)






Maybe,, and that would have been terrific, But what if GM and Chrysler went belly up and there wasn't any money to get for investors?

What about 200,000 people at GM alone that would have been thrown out of work while a new company was formed and financed.

What about the Vendors of GM alone that would have been thrown out of business through no fault of thier own other then they were owed money by GM?

What about all the GM Dealers that wouldn't have any product to sell,, how many employees is that.

What about.... oh you get my drift

I'd say a rough guess (and that's all it is) Between GM and Chrysler and all thier subsidiaries, Vendors, Dealers etc.. we'd have seen maybe as many as 2 to 3 million jobs eliminated. That's on top of what we already had lost.

The banks and AIG and other bailed out institutions would only add to that and the uncertainty on Wall Street was bad enough as it was, can you imagine how much worse it would have or could have been.

Point is, while I like your idea and think it's possible.. it could have gone the other way just as easily and put this entire country in a depression potentially much worse than 1929.

Some times, the alternatives to not helping, are worse than if you do help.

That's all I'm trying to point out...


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
Yes, there might have been some negatives.

But, companies would have learned that when they make stupid decisions, they will cease to exist without the deep pockets of the American Taxpayer to stand behind them.

As it is, they have learned that they bear no real risk, so they are free to continue to make stupid decisions, as in risky investments which pay off big to the members of the board and management, with no downside whatsoever.

This is like letting your kid kick a houseguest in the nads and then giving him an ice-cream cone.

Since we have pretty well established that Mac is apparently hallucinating, I think it may be time to put him on ignore.

For him, and Charlie, as well, the Bush Tax Cuts are no longer "tax cuts for the rich" because Obama is thinking about extending them, so now they are just plain tax cuts. Edit your scripts accordingly.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Tea Party? or Republican?

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5