Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#552786 12/20/10 12:36 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Man does this division suck, or what?

The 49'ers, at 5-9, are still in the playoff picture. The division winner, should they win out, will be 8-8.

The top teams are:

St Louis: 6-8 Remaining Games are San Francisco at home and @ Seattle

Seattle: 6-8 Remaining Games are @ Tampa Bay and St Louis at home

San Francisco: 5-9 Remaining games are @ St Louis and Arizona at home.

I wonder who wins if there is a 3 way tie at 7-9?


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,210
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,210
SF would win based on head to head win %, they would be 3-1. STL and Sea would both be 2-2.


LIbertatem Defendimus!!

2010 Dawgtalkers NCAA Bracket Challenge Champ!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
I'd love to see a 7-9 team make the playoffs and win the Super Bowl.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,186
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,186
they need to have a rule, if you're under .500 you can't qualify for the playoffs even if you win your division. why should a 7-9 team get a playoff berth, and a home game over a 10-6 squad. makes 0 sense.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
However ...... why have divisions if they don't mean anything?

I DO think that the payoffs should be seeded by record regardless of whether you are a wildcard or a division winner though.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
In my opinion, divisions are important for scheduling, though some are set up without regard to geography - and that's not an overriding factor by any means. (Were I a traveling fan, I would much rather have Detroit, Buffalo, or Indy in the Browns division, than Baltimore.)

Let alone be only 7-9, I don't believe ANY division winner should be seeded over any team with a better record, UNLESS that winner won a head-to-head contest.

Divisions can still be made to be important. I would tie some kind of monetary reward to them, for example.

You could also realign divisions every year based on standings. Next year, I might have Carolina, Cincy, Denver and Detroit in the same division.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 5
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 5
Quote:

they need to have a rule, if you're under .500 you can't qualify for the playoffs even if you win your division. why should a 7-9 team get a playoff berth, and a home game over a 10-6 squad. makes 0 sense.




I get what you're saying, but then why even have divisions? I remember quite a few years ago when an upstart 8-8 team with two 1,000 rushers and a young QB won the AFC Central and had a 21-3 halftime lead on the Miami Dolphins in the first round of the playoffs. While the Dolphins won that game, those 8-8 Browns - who were ridiculed for "backing in" to the playoffs, proved they belonged.

If you want to base it on record, then you might as well give the Lombardi Trophy to the team with the best regular season record and skip the rest.


There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do.
-Derek Jeter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 8
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 8
I don't have a problem with any Division Champ making the playoffs, but hosting a playoff game is ridiculous.

Let's just say that in a bizarro world someday the Browns won the North with a 7-9 record... there's no way they should be able to host a 10-6 NE, a 9-7 SD or NYJ or Indy. That rule needs changed.


"If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college"
GO ROCKETS
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:


Divisions can still be made to be important. I would tie some kind of monetary reward to them, for example.

You could also realign divisions every year based on standings. Next year, I might have Carolina, Cincy, Denver and Detroit in the same division.




no rivalries anymore? no way.

i do agree with your assertion that there should be a .500 minimum for making the playoffs and that winning your division doesn't guarantee a home playoff game (perhaps make it the 1st tiebreaker).


#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
I think the playoffs absolutely should be seeded by record regardless of whether or not you win your division. Finishing without a losing record should not be rewarded with hosting a playoff game at home. It would also give incentive for teams that have clinched playoff berths early to continue playing meaningfully so that they can attain the highest seed possible.

Adam_P #552796 12/26/10 09:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
The Division only got worse today,...now next week's Seattle - St Louis game will produce either an 8-8 or 7-9 division winner with 2 other NFC teams at 10-6 and staying home.

They need to take a hard look at this, assuming the thought is not lending itself more to "parity." (I wouldn't care if every team in the League finished 8-8 -- you'd just have to have some more detailed tiebreakers.)

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 162
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 162
Unless they do away with divisions that's just the way it is some years... you want in the playoffs? win your division... if you do that then you don't have to worry about what your record is or tie breaker or any of that stuff....


<><

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
If everyone was 8-8, you certainly would have to worry about tiebreakers,...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 162
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 162
That's what I'm saying... if you don't want to worry about the tie-breakers just win the division...


<><

#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 126
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 126
Quote:

Unless they do away with divisions that's just the way it is some years... you want in the playoffs? win your division... if you do that then you don't have to worry about what your record is or tie breaker or any of that stuff....




If they do away with divisions, might as well do away with conferences. Next someone will complain about a 10-6 team in the NFC staying home and a 9-7 AFC team getting in.


It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Quote:

Quote:

Unless they do away with divisions that's just the way it is some years... you want in the playoffs? win your division... if you do that then you don't have to worry about what your record is or tie breaker or any of that stuff....




If they do away with divisions, might as well do away with conferences. Next someone will complain about a 10-6 team in the NFC staying home and a 9-7 AFC team getting in.




I think that's obviously a stretch there...not quite the same dichotomy as being a division winner with a losing record. I think that's the concern there.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 504
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 504
I'm curious to see how people would feel about this scenario even though it would be very unlikely.

Who would be more deserving to either be in the playoffs all together.

A 10 - 6 team that lost all 6 division games or a 7 - 9 team that went 3 - 3 in its division.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Quote:

That's what I'm saying... if you don't want to worry about the tie-breakers just win the division...




(I 'd just like to win more than 5 games sometime,..)

And I'm saying you just can't do that when everyone is 8-8. Just pointing out that the current system would probably have to be tweaked to accomodate this kind of an anamoly,...as in, "don't leave me home because of some coin flip."

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
A 10-6 team. They won more games. That's what pro football is about...winning games.

Adam_P #552805 12/29/10 04:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Likes: 11
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Likes: 11
j/c

Being a Seahawks season ticket holder - I kind of wish I was going to this game. Sunday night (and Monday night) games have an extra energy to them.

That being said, I don't think they win, and driving the 3+ hours each way for that doesn't sound like fun. It sounds like less fun if they win, as playoff tickets were $154 for the 2 seats and N'Awlins (likely) will destroy them...

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Treat it like a first-round playoff, and go.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Likes: 11
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Likes: 11
There are 3 of us that split the 2 seats and one of the other guys has this game. if they win, I'll probably go to the playoff game just because I already bought the tickets...

I'll be watching it though - will be a great football day for me watching the Browns on TV (rarity out here), then the Seahawks later.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Well, I'm pullling for 'ya until they have to play the Bears.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Likes: 390
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Likes: 390
Quote:

I'll be watching it though - will be a great football day for me watching the Browns on TV (rarity out here), , then the Seahawks later.




Hey, I watch the Browns on TV "out here" everyweek. You should just come to the Blitz Ladd and watch the game with a bunch of other local Dawgs.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Likes: 11
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Likes: 11
Yeah, I should - Sunday is normally the only day I have to get things done around here, so I try to stay home with the game audio on my phone and do "chores".

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
J/c,...I want to bump this and remind everyone this is basically a head-to-head playoff game, and ought to be worth watching tonite, even while we hang our heads otherwise,....

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Yeah...I already adopted the Rams, which probably means they'll lose

I like how Spags has them playing...a fun team to watch....their fans have every right to talk about "process"


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Because they play in a crappy division and have 2 more wins than us?


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Quote:

Because they play in a crappy division and have 2 more wins than us?




No, because they have less talent than us and are put in a good position to win constantly despite haveing bottom dweller talent....just look at their D formations and presnap movement on O....Spags isn't 100%, no HC is...but he's doing a pretty good job...the Rams have 43 sacks (just 1 behind league 1st) and have pretty much the worst starting OLB tandem in the entire league (Vobora, Chamberlain, Grant), a very crappy SS (Dahl), an overrated at best AVG FS (Atogwe) and a very young CB group with mixed talent (Fletcher dude is ok, the rest? meh)...their DL has some talent but he got the most out of pretty much every player there...Robbins and Hall were declining year after year...and now they have career years at 33/34yo? Long finally broke out? That's no coincidence, that's good coaching...Spags is a D-mastermind and he has an overall pretty crappy D playing way above their heads

Their O needs some work, but they are very creative to use what little they have....this team is really challenging us for the worst WR group, believe it or not...and they have no rec-TE like us, they have a worse OL, Jackson had a 3.7yd/carry year...they have a top 10 rookie QB, we had a 3rd round QB, that's their only position they're better equipped....and they still produce over 20yds/game more than us

It's coaching...trust me...just once, you won't regret it


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Likes: 11
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Likes: 11
Please change your adoption Django. I really don't want to go see Nawlins destroy Seattle next week, and doubt I'll be able to get rid of the tickets.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Quote:

Quote:

Because they play in a crappy division and have 2 more wins than us?




No, because they have less talent than us and are put in a good position to win constantly despite haveing bottom dweller talent....just look at their D formations and presnap movement on O....Spags isn't 100%, no HC is...but he's doing a pretty good job...the Rams have 43 sacks (just 1 behind league 1st) and have pretty much the worst starting OLB tandem in the entire league (Vobora, Chamberlain, Grant), a very crappy SS (Dahl), an overrated at best AVG FS (Atogwe) and a very young CB group with mixed talent (Fletcher dude is ok, the rest? meh)...their DL has some talent but he got the most out of pretty much every player there...Robbins and Hall were declining year after year...and now they have career years at 33/34yo? Long finally broke out? That's no coincidence, that's good coaching...Spags is a D-mastermind and he has an overall pretty crappy D playing way above their heads

Their O needs some work, but they are very creative to use what little they have....this team is really challenging us for the worst WR group, believe it or not...and they have no rec-TE like us, they have a worse OL, Jackson had a 3.7yd/carry year...they have a top 10 rookie QB, we had a 3rd round QB, that's their only position they're better equipped....and they still produce over 20yds/game more than us

It's coaching...trust me...just once, you won't regret it




The Rams play in a crap division.

They have scored 12 poiints more than us, and have given up 20 fewer points (going into tonight's game) while playing the Seahawks, 49ers and Cardinals while we were playing the Steelers, Bengaks, and Ravens.

Pardon me if I'm unimpressed.

3 of their 7 wins have come against crappy teams in their own division.

Do you really think that the Rams could beat the Steelers or Ravens even once out of 4 games?


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Which part of "they have less talent than us" didn't you get btw? ...I even gave you an Offense and Defense breakdown...we DO, in fact, have better talent as much as you like to repeat that we are nothing and should be thankful to Mangini for the 5 wins we got and just follow his "process"....let me guess, you're a devout catcholic, right?


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
The Rams have less talent? That's debatable. They definitely have more pass rushers than we do. (by far) What's not debatable is that they won 3 games inside of their division, and the best team in that division has less talent than the Bengals do in the AFC North. The Bengals would have run away with that division, probably going undefeated in the division.

Look at St Louis' schedule. I know you don't seem to think that it matters who a team plays .... but humor me:

Arizona 5-11
@ Oakland 8-8
Washington 6-10
Seattle 6-9 (not counting tonight)
@ Detroit 6-10
San Diego 9-7
@ Tampa Bay 10-6
Carolina 2-14
@ San Francisco 6-10
Atlanta 13-3
@ Denver 4-12
@ Arizona 5-11
@ New Orleans 11-5
Kansas City 10-6
San Francisco 6-10
Seattle 6-9 (awaiting tonight's final)

Our common opponents were
Tampa Bay
Carolina
Atlanta
New Orleans
Kansas City

They went 1-4 and we went 2-3 against common opponents.

Outside of common opponents, they had 1 game against a team with a winning record. (San Diego)

We had 7, having played Baltimore twice, Pittsburgh twice, New England, NY Jets, and Jacksonville.

That might make a slight difference, don't you think?


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 529
Likes: 13
S
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
S
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 529
Likes: 13
Quote:






Nah, that's WIN!

..here's to hoping Seattle shocks the Saints giving fans another reason to complain.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
I hope the Seahags win the damn Super Bowl.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
J/K

I don't understand why so many are upset about the Seahawks record. If the NFL put a priority on having the best six teams in the playoffs from each conference, they wouldn't have set up divisions. There's always a possibility of this happening.

In 2008, the 11-5 Pats didn't go to the playoffs but the 8-8 Chargers went. I'm sure people were upset then, but not as much now. And that 8-8 Chargers team went on to beat the 12-4 Colts in the first round. While that doesn't prove the system works, but it shows that even a .500 team can advance once they get in. IMO, Seattle has a punchers chance against the Saints too (unlikely, but their defense played well last night).

Plus, it's only happened twice since the 4-divisional lineup started in 2002. Twice in nine years doesn't really get me that upset.

If we all wanted it "fair".....then do away with the divisions and conferences. The best 12 teams in the league advance, period. That's drastic, but it's the only way to ensure this doesn't happen again. I don't think we need to go that route.

I wouldn't even bother with changing the rules so that a .500 or below division winner can't host a playoff game. If they truly stink, the wild card team should be able to beat them regardless where it's played. And it the division winner wins, it proves they belong.


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Likes: 147
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Likes: 147
I agree... And people wouldn't be complaining if it was Cleveland with 7-9 winning the AFCN to move into the playoffs.


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,003
Likes: 370
Like I said ...... I hope they win the Super Bowl.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,517
Quote:

I agree... And people wouldn't be complaining if it was Cleveland with 7-9 winning the AFCN to move into the playoffs.




owned

Page 1 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum The NFC West....

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5