Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
Quote:

I think it's obvious... But then,, if you don't,, that's ok with me.. as for others thinking it's not obvious,, is it that you expected me to just accept that as any kinda proof?




I'm not using it to prove to you that I am right, but that it is not obvious, because many people see it otherwise.

Obvious means that it is very clear, without much room for interpretation. His statements were not "obvious" at all.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
It read like a very backhanded compliment to me... kind of like telling a woman she looks good.... for her age.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
I totally agree. saying "even the gays" sounds like they're assumed to be some deviants. I was letting it go, but it reads nasty.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I say enough of the in your face
'Gay pride' BS.




I agree. I have never understood it and I really hope I never go off the deep end and do.




It's as if we are suppose to think of them special citizens or something




Nah, we don't want you to think of us as "special citizens", thanks.


#gmstrong #gmlapdance
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Quote:

It read like a very backhanded compliment to me... kind of like telling a woman she looks good.... for her age.




Yes, but he has since explained what he meant.. so that's whats obvious..

Geesh,,,,


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
Quote:

Quote:

It read like a very backhanded compliment to me... kind of like telling a woman she looks good.... for her age.




Yes, but he has since explained what he meant.. so that's whats obvious..

Geesh,,,,




He didn't explain anything. He said his "horses of a different color" comment explained it, yet it made no sense at all to what he was talking about.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
I hope you are right about what FLDawg feels. If not you are going to look really silly defending what he meant so vigorously. I do speak from experience.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Quote:

I hope you are right about what FLDawg feels. If not you are going to look really silly defending what he meant so vigorously. I do speak from experience.




I"m pretty much on record having no problems with anybody for color, religion or sexual preference.. I'm not worried one bit about looking silly to anyone at anytime over something like this.

I don't believe he meant anything derogatory with his comment. I'm sticking by that. If indeed it is later proven that he did, then shame on him.. But I'll not feel the least bit silly.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:

Quote:

It read like a very backhanded compliment to me... kind of like telling a woman she looks good.... for her age.




Yes, but he has since explained what he meant.. so that's whats obvious..

Geesh,,,,



I don't really care what he meant.. I just asked the question if he knew how it sounded...


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Let's say, for example, that there was a thread here about someone doing something extremely stupid.

Now let's say that in the context of this thread, I would say 'even Damanshot wouldn't do something that dumb'.

What is that to be interpreted as?

Damanshot is dumb.

FL's comments, whether he intended them to be or not, indicated homosexuals as deviants.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
page 1.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 798
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 798
Quote:

And this is why we will continue to fight with these people, because we don't understand them.




If "understanding" is tiptoeing around any issue that a conservative religious political group in Pakistan considers a problem, then I guess I'm not understanding.

Quote:

And because pretending to care about gay Pakistani's plays well in American politics whether we are ticking off much of the rest of the Muslim world or not... We won't let our own soldiers wear a cross or display a Bible because it could offend a Muslim in this part of the world and then we do this?




Is this really true? I'm pretty sure you are allowed to have both a cross and a Bible. You are not allowed to try and push your religion on the populace as a member of the Army (which you shouldn't be allowed to do; the US Army is not a missionary service), but you can practice as you like I thought. Maybe someone who knows better than me could weigh in?

Quote:

It's not a show of support for a persecuted group, it's a calculated political ploy to get some mileage with the gay voting bloc in the United States.. our embassy could care less if the gay people leaving the event were tracked, followed and imprisoned.. they already got their political mileage from the event.




Does this feel like a US political event to you? Very low profile, the only reports I have seen started in small blogs for the Washington Times and something called albawaba.com. First, don't you think this would have been highly publicized in the major US news outlets if it were solely to score political points? Second, doesn't supporting gay rights in the US go further with the US gay community than supporting gay rights in Pakistan? If it is a US political ploy, then it was very poorly executed.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:

You are not allowed to try and push your religion on the populace as a member of the Army (which you shouldn't be allowed to do; the US Army is not a missionary service),



But it's the state departments job to try to advance a western social agenda in a predominantly Muslim nation with whom we already have a very strained relationship by holding an event that we KNEW would tick off a considerable percentage of the population?

So we should not push "our" religion but we should feel free to trample on theirs... got it.

Look, I don't agree with their position either but this sort of strikes me as overtly political.. maybe you are right, maybe it is just poorly conceived and executed but these nations treat women as bad or worse than they treat gay people and have for centuries and we decided THIS was the issue we should take a stand on? Doesn't that seem odd to you?


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
J
Legend
Offline
Legend
J
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
Quote:

I don't believe that even people from Aurora would be too dumb to know what he meant.






Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 798
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 798
Quote:

Look, I don't agree with their position either but this sort of strikes me as overtly political.. maybe you are right, maybe it is just poorly conceived and executed but these nations treat women as bad or worse than they treat gay people and have for centuries and we decided THIS was the issue we should take a stand on? Doesn't that seem odd to you?




I absolutely agree that many women are treated as secondary citizens there, and it is absolutely unacceptable. The US embassy does a number of positive things to support women in Pakistan.

http://pdwali.wordpress.com/

(Since it was a site that I wasn't familiar with, I googled a few of the points on the list, and they checked out through more traditional news outlets).

The gay rights reception was just the one that made a blog on the Washington Times, and its also just the most recent thing that happened. Taking a stand on one issue doesn't mean its the only thing going on there.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 798
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 798
Quote:

But it's the state departments job to try to advance a western social agenda in a predominantly Muslim nation with whom we already have a very strained relationship by holding an event that we KNEW would tick off a considerable percentage of the population?




Just my perspective, but this isn't pushing a Western social agenda. It is promoting tolerance. Pushing an agenda would be to say that "the only way to live is gay. Everyone should be gay." This was more, "we think that gay people should have rights, and we don't agree with the way they are treated in this country."

Quote:

So we should not push "our" religion but we should feel free to trample on theirs... got it.




That is exactly how I feel. When a country perverts and distorts religion to use it as a pretext for suppression and persecution of a minority that they don't like, then I don't care if it gets trampled and it does not deserve respect. These countries living under Sharia law who pervert the Quran to foster fear are the perfect example of why the separation of church and state is still the best way to go IMO.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Quote:

Let's say, for example, that there was a thread here about someone doing something extremely stupid.

Now let's say that in the context of this thread, I would say 'even Damanshot wouldn't do something that dumb'.

What is that to be interpreted as?

Damanshot is dumb.

FL's comments, whether he intended them to be or not, indicated homosexuals as deviants.




Believe it or not, that very thing has happened..,

I took his comments with a grain of salt..

What we have here is you and others thinking he meant something that I don't think he meant..

I certainly didn't take it as him calling anyone deviant,

But you are entitled to your own opinion...


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 284
1st String
Offline
1st String
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 284
J/C

Thought I'd point this out, as it's been mentioned a few times in the thread. It is a popular misconception that embassies are considered the foreign soil of the country they represent. This is false.

The U.S. government considers its embassies to be U.S. soil in a legal sense, meaning American laws apply there (i.e. even if assault is legal in country X, it's still illegal in the U.S. embassy there). However, they are still under the sovereign power of the country in which they are located, and thus are subject to its laws. In other words, if a Pakistani citizen murdered another Pakistani citizen in the Pakistani embassy, he would still be arrested by D.C. police and charged with homicide under the federal code.


[Linked Image from i26.tinypic.com]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
this seems to be a more effective way of telling Pakistan that we are mad at them:

Quote:


http://news.yahoo.com/pakistans-ex-president-criticizes-loss-us-aid-011124876.html

.HOUSTON (AP) — Former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf said Monday that the Obama administration's suspension of $800 million in U.S. aid to the Pakistani military is not in the interest of either nation and could hamper anti-terrorism efforts.

"We are weakening the country and the army," Musharraf said during an address at Rice University's Baker Institute of Public Policy. "It will have a negative effect certainly on the Pakistan army, on its capability to fight terrorism."

President Barack Obama's chief of staff, William Daley, confirmed over the weekend the withholding of the cash intended for the Pakistani military. He said while the strained relationship between the United States and Pakistan must be made "to work over time," until it does, "we'll hold back some of the money that the American taxpayers are committed to give" to the country's powerful military forces.

Musharraf said he was saddened by the "present environment of confrontation almost between Pakistan and the United States, between the two armies, the two intelligence services."

"It saddens me because I remember when there was trust," he said, pointing to what he said were his strong relationships with President George W. Bush and then-Secretary of State Colin Powell.

"I could pick up the phone," he said. "The line was always open. I wonder now if that degree of communication exists."

He said there was a "trust deficit" and a "confidence deficit" between the countries and the restoration of better relations depended on leadership and straight talk, beginning with Pakistani assurances to Washington that there was no complicity with providing haven for Osama bin Laden.

The former military ruler's tenure as president included the years Osama bin Laden apparently moved to the compound in Abbottabad, home of Pakistan's military academy, where he was killed May 2 by U.S. commandos during a covert raid.

As he has in the past, Musharraf on Monday denied he or Pakistan's domestic spy services knew of bin Laden's location, at least during his time in power.

"For two years, I can for sure, with 100 percent guarantee, whether you believe it or not, I didn't know," he said.

As for the possibility of the army or the Pakistani intelligence service hiding that knowledge from him, he said: "No. Absolutely zero. They are my people. I commanded them. How could they hide from me?"

He said a step in easing the rift between the nations would start with the U.S. taking into concern "our sensitivities, our own honor and dignity as a sovereign nation."

While Americans were angered at the possibility Pakistan was providing bin Laden cover, Pakistanis were enraged over what they saw as American violation of their sovereignty in the raid on bin Laden.

On Sunday, Daley acknowledged much the same, saying the decision to suspend military aid resulted from the increasing estrangement between the U.S. and its sometimes unreliable partner in the fight against terrorism.

"Obviously there's still a lot of pain that the political system in Pakistan is feeling by virtue of the raid that we did to get Osama bin Laden," Daley said.

The U.S. long has been unhappy with Pakistan's evident lack of enthusiasm for carrying the fight against terrorists to its tribal areas, as well as its covert support for the Taliban and anti-Indian extremist groups. A senior U.S. official has confirmed the aid suspension came in response to the Pakistani army's decision to significantly reduce the number of visas for U.S. military trainers.

Musharraf said the start of any trust would begin "at the top level."

"At the people's level, I think gradually it will take time and be restored," he said.

Musharraf took power in Pakistan in a 1999 coup and held it until stepping down in 2008 after months of protests and election losses among his supporters. He also drew criticism for his ouster of a supreme court judge, an action he defended Monday as constitutional.

Since his departure from Pakistan, he has been living in Dubai and London and has been making speaking appearances at colleges and universities.

He has said he'll return to his homeland no later than next March to resume his political ambitions and is considering a presidential run in 2013, which he called "the mother of all elections."

"I am very conscious of this," he said. "I am trying to contribute my bit to bring change about. We need to have determination and if it's in Pakistan's destiny to rise as a moderate progressive Islamic state."

He said a return to Pakistan would be for the nation's sake, not his.

"I'm very happy on the lecture circuit," he said. "They give me good money. I can live anywhere. As far as I'm concerned I'm comfortable."

Musharraf also has been dogged by allegations he was part of a conspiracy to assassinate ex-Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in late 2007. He did not address that Monday in Houston but in the past has denied any involvement.
.





#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
I heard about this a couple days ago and kudos to the administration.. because right now giving out huge sums of money is hampering OUR ability to fight terrorism because it is weakening our financial stability and if we are going to fight anybody or protect ourselves the first thing we must be is financially viable.... we are still providing them the humanitarian financial assistance which I also disagree with but this is at least a start.


yebat' Putin
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum US Holds Gay Pride Event in Pakistan

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5