|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223 |
Well, after re-watching the game tonight, I have come to the conclusion that Marecic is definitely not Vickers.
Granted it was only the first game, but I saw no intensity in him like you saw with Vickers. The guy didn't hit his blocks hard, didn't look to go full go, and didn't go out hunting to put someone on their rump like you seen Vickers do. Hopefully he turns out to be a better blocker than what I saw. Not sure if anyone has watched him in camp or got a chance to see him do anything else.
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510 |
He's definitely not Vickers.
Then again, Vickers wasn't Vickers right off the bat either.
Further, they didn't bring Marecic in to be Vickers.
They brought him in to be a more all around FB, as opposed to being just a blocker.
For what it's worth, I disliked the move .... but I understand why they did it.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,289
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,289 |
And then we can have another discussion. If we cut...say...Dockery and keep J Brown, the debate will go from being about A Smith to being about Dockery...or a backup DL...or another WR...or another OL or ? And so on...
In the end, I think guys like J Brown are a dime a dozen. Give me another DB or developmental lineman in a season where we are not going to win the Division anyway.
I liken it to Larry Asante vs. Ventrone/Sorensen/Castanzo
What is wildly different now is that I have a great deal of confidence in Holmgren & Heckert and their workings with Shurmur...if they keep J Brown, I understand that. If they cut J Brown, I understand that too.
Personally I would value another developmental player over a guy like J Brown.
(And...yes...I know H & H were here last year too.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,432
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,432 |
So was Vickers actually released or is he still on the roster? I am totally against canning a player just because he does not fit 100% into a certain scheme you are trying to build(except a defensive player with the 34 and 43 defenses). Providing he doesn't have any glaring inefficiencies, who's to say a player can't learn the scheme like everyone else? With offensive players, unless you're super slow, is it truly that hard to play a certain way or catch more passes out of the backfield like the WC offense dictates? Maybe I just don't know enough about the WC offense or the role of the fullback position to know if Vickers would not have been a good fit...
Find what you love and let it kill you.
-Charles Bukowski
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510 |
Vickers was never tendered. He is a Texan today.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,521 |
Had a nice 22-yard reception last night too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
Quote:
We aren't winning the Division this year...if 2 QBs get hurt in one game, we still aren't winning the Division this year.
If this team can stay healthy, They Can win 10 games this year, and They Might win the division this year.
I just don't understand the fans conceding so many losses, even a losing season, this time of year. (not necessarily this person but the others I've read who are saying it will be a 2 or 3 or 4 win season )
I don't beleive that.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620 |
Quote:
Well, after re-watching the game tonight, I have come to the conclusion that Marecic is definitely not Vickers.
I agree. I was also a little surprised that he had to be told by the guys on the sideline that he needed to pick up that missed lateral.
Similar thing - A guy here at work is a big Jets fan and was going off about how good McElroy looked. I mentioned about the last play of the game, where with no time left on the clock and down by 4 from about the 20. He takes off running, gets to the 10 and then fires a pass into the end zone. I've seen QBs fire off a pass as they pass the line of scrimmage, or maybe a step past it, but never 10 yards past. He was next to the first down marker when he chucked it. Running on that play showed he had no idea of the situation, but then throwing that pass at the end of the run was just stupid.
Anyway, the guy here goes on about how McElroy is a rookie. I agree he is, but I'm sure he's faced the whole "no foward pass past the line of scrimmage" rule just about every level of football he has participated in. Some things rookies should know, too.
Same with Marecic. The NFL is not the first level where laterals are introduced. Get your heads out and start thinking.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850 |
Quote:
And then we can have another discussion. If we cut...say...Dockery and keep J Brown, the debate will go from being about A Smith to being about Dockery...or a backup DL...or another WR...or another OL or ? And so on...
In the end, I think guys like J Brown are a dime a dozen. Give me another DB or developmental lineman in a season where we are not going to win the Division anyway.
I liken it to Larry Asante vs. Ventrone/Sorensen/Castanzo
What is wildly different now is that I have a great deal of confidence in Holmgren & Heckert and their workings with Shurmur...if they keep J Brown, I understand that. If they cut J Brown, I understand that too.
Personally I would value another developmental player over a guy like J Brown.
so glad ur not in the front office.. In our situation developing a guy like Brown is a LOT easier to do b/c Wallace needs no coaching. He already knows the system. You say it would be best to just cut the 3rd string guy, and if we ever need one, just pick up a vet off the street. :smh: So u have 2 options..
1) Play a guy who is young, and give him the opportunity to see what he has.
2) Play a guy who will only get hired to manage a game because he doesn't know the offense, so the game plan will be sugar coated, and then at best will only keep the game close, and then probably lose at the end. If you can pick this guy off the street ANY time, then he probably isn't that good to begin with, which is the reason he is not on a team.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510 |
A guy like Wallace has some value ..... and if we can develop a guy like brown, we might be able to move Wallace at ome point for value.
That's the best argument for 3 QBs. If you can showcase your backup, and have that 3rd guy who has promise, then you have options down the road.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246 |
Quote:
Then again, Vickers wasn't Vickers right off the bat either.
^This.
I have a feeling Marecic's head is still swimming like no other.
JMHO
I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,437
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,437 |
Quote:
Quote:
Then again, Vickers wasn't Vickers right off the bat either.
^This.
I have a feeling Marecic's head is still swimming like no other.
JMHO
I agree. It was his first game in a Cleveland Browns uniform and he is constantly in the shadow of Vickers by the fans.
As Ytown stated, Marecic isn't here just to be the brusing FB Vickers was. We want the all around game from him. In this offense a big brusing FB isn't as important as having a multi dimensional FB that can do a variety of things (block, catch, run) Plus Marecic brings value to Special Teams which is a huge plus and allows us to utilize that roster spot on someone else.
I liked Vickers as much as the next guy and loved the attitude he brought to the team, but I don't think he is going to be missed as much as you guys think once the season is underway.
“It doesn't make sense to hire smart people and tell them what to do; we hire smart people so they can tell us what to do.” -Steve Jobs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246 |
The debate will also contain the "could Hillis have done so well last year without Vickers" portion. I know I don't know enough about football to really answer it.
But, I think our offense is going to be different than last year. Hopefully we're not going to rely so heavily on the running game. And, getting Hillis out in open space on dump offs or screens is pretty exciting, too.
I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850 |
Quote:
"could Hillis have done so well last year without Vickers" portion. I know I don't know enough about football to really answer it.
it's funny but there's a similar debate going on in Houston about "could Arian have done so well last yer without Vonta Leach" and "how much are his stats going to go down with Vickers"
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510 |
The more I think about this whole thing with Favre ...... I wonder if McCoy got a note slipped under his door one night ....... "I know you're a big Brett Favre fan. He knows your new offense as well as anyone, and is willing to spend a few days tutoring you. Here is his number. Give him a call." Signed: No one even remotely associated with the Browns or their organization" 
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246 |
Quote:
The more I think about this whole thing with Favre ...... I wonder if McCoy got a note slipped under his door one night .......
"I know you're a big Brett Favre fan. He knows your new offense as well as anyone, and is willing to spend a few days tutoring you. Here is his number. Give him a call."
Signed: No one even remotely associated with the Browns or their organization"
lol
Or "Signed: M. Holmgren. No, wait. Mike H."
I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660 |
Quote:
The more I think about this whole thing with Favre ...... I wonder if McCoy got a note slipped under his door one night .......
"I know you're a big Brett Favre fan. He knows your new offense as well as anyone, and is willing to spend a few days tutoring you. Here is his number. Give him a call."
Signed: No one even remotely associated with the Browns or their organization"

With all of the talk...."It's no big deal, because the rest of the teams are doing the same".
Now we find out that GB and Rogers never meet as a group as with the "Camp Colts".
With that said they where not installing a new offense, but just the same it makes me feel even more confident in 'our Guy'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660 |
by Marty Gitlin - Steinbach leaves with trainer LG Eric Steinbach walked off with a trainer and has been replaced by rookie Jason Pinkston. Steinbach missed the first week of camp with a knee injury, but was not limping when he left practice. Update to come. Browns RapidReports
Replaced by Pinkston and not Murray who had been running with the 1's when Stinny was out earlier in camp.
I think that Pinkston is the future there at LG and he and Lauvao will be our OG tandem of the future.
Last edited by FL_Dawg; 08/17/11 10:16 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660 |
Training Camp Notebook - 8/16 By Matt Florjancic, ClevelandBrowns.com Staff Writer Posted 15 hours ago The Browns have been developing consistency along the offensive line during the 2011 training camp. Over the last two seasons, the Browns have found a way to mix youth with experience along the offensive line and look to do the same in 2011. The left side of the line is anchored by four-time Pro Bowl tackle Joe Thomas (fifth season) and guard Eric Steinbach (ninth year). Right tackle Tony Pashos has nine years of service in the NFL, while center Alex Mack, fresh off his first Pro Bowl appearance, is in his third year. Right guard Shawn Lauvao began his second professional season when the team opened camp July 30th. “We’ve got guys on all sides of their career,” Browns coach Pat Shurmur said Tuesday morning. “We’ve got older veterans; we’ve got some younger guys fitting in and I think the key to the offensive line is that they get to play together, which, fortunately, we’ve done for a few weeks now. I feel like I see progress there. There are a lot of very talented guys that seem to be working well together.” Despite injuries to Pashos and Lauvao, the Browns’ offensive line blocked for a 1,000-yard running back in Peyton Hillis last season. This training camp, the team is working with rookie Jason Pinkston , who was the second of the Browns’ two fifth-round picks in April’s draft. Pinkston has been working his way into the rotation as a guard. “It’s been understated and really not talked about, but he’s a guy that’s got a chance to be a good player,” said Shurmur, a former offensive lineman during his collegiate career at Michigan State. “He’s working through training camp. He’s done some things that you need to see in an offensive lineman as far as coming off the ball, finishing blocks. He’s a real heavy body, lower body guy, he’s got an anchor. He knows how to play the game. We’re pleased with his progress. We’d like to see it keep going.” Second-year Browns offensive lineman and Youngstown native, Branndon Braxton has also been competing for a spot on the team this summer. Braxton has been working mainly at tackle and is listed as Joe Thomas’ back-up. “The advantage he has in some regard, he can play tackle; he’s primarily a tackle,” Shurmur said. “He’s done a good job. Again, these next three preseason games, we’ll talk about it tomorrow, but the ones kind of play a half. The twos and threes go in there during the second half. He’s still going to get a bunch of reps, which are going to be important.” TALKING WITH YATES The Browns lost one offensive lineman on Monday when veteran Billy Yates talked with the front office about retiring. Monday evening, he was placed on the reserve/retired list. “I will have some follow-up here as we go; I think it’s important,” Shurmur said. “As I mentioned yesterday, I like Billy. I think he’s a fine man. He was a good, good player for a long time. He was a guy who was undrafted and he fought it out in this league for eight-plus years. That’s a lot to be said for a guy.” ADJUSTING THE WORKLOAD For the second straight day, second-year Browns running back Montario Hardesty was able to practice with the team in full pads. Though his carries were down from Monday, it was not due to an injury or setback. “We had some two-versus-one and one-versus-two,” Shurmur said. “We had a pretty steady rotation in there. It looked like, to me, that he was in there pretty steady throughout the practice. He responded well I thought. There was a little bit of banging and knocking around and I think he handled it pretty well.” web page
Last edited by FL_Dawg; 08/17/11 10:28 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850 |
I hope we are just being cautious with our vet (Steinbach) and allowing our rookie (Pinkston) to get more playing time with the starters.
I want to see our best OL we can put forth against the Bengals. Pinkston is hopefully our future at LG, but I want that to remain in the future (for now).
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246 |
Seems to me that this new regime is being very cautious with injuries. Read quite a few things about a guy walking off with the trainer, and then either coming back soon afterwards with no problems or coming back the next day with no problems.
Some might see it as coddling, though some will see it as being smart. Take your pick.
I also think the absolute flood of easy info contributes to it. I have a feeling small injuries and stuff like that have always happened, but we just never knew about it.
Now, whenever a guy gets his hammy wrapped, it's front page news.
I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850 |
very true. and the social media demands something be put out there every 15 minutes or so, which helps contribute to it.
even Peter King was railing against it in this weeks MMQB
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660 |
So true. I think it's just a reflection of our real time tech based society today.
Hopefully it's nothing serious and Pinkston is allowed time to develop and hone his skills.
Not much has been talked about with our 2nd 5th round pick, but I think we hit on both.
Insuring a strong OL for the future as well as today. I had Pinkston as a possible selection with our then 3rd round pick #70. I think if he had been an offensive guard in College we would have heard his name called much sooner in the Draft.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
I watched the Packers game last night again (missed most of 2nd half due to storms first time around) and I was blown away with the battle between Pinkston and the DE for the Packers. Incredible trench warfare.
Pinkston, Mack and Lauvao in the middle with Joe Thomas and Pashos on the outside would be one of the biggest and definitely the strongest lines in the league. Only question will be is Pinkston ready to take over for Steiny.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660 |
Quote:
I watched the Packers game last night again (missed most of 2nd half due to storms first time around) and I was blown away with the battle between Pinkston and the DE for the Packers. Incredible trench warfare.
Pinkston, Mack and Lauvao in the middle with Joe Thomas and Pashos on the outside would be one of the biggest and definitely the strongest lines in the league. Only question will be is Pinkston ready to take over for Steiny.
I don't think that that's a position you want to throw a guy into the fire at, but if the situation dictates that he is, then that's what it has to be.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850 |
Quote:
Quote:
I watched the Packers game last night again (missed most of 2nd half due to storms first time around) and I was blown away with the battle between Pinkston and the DE for the Packers. Incredible trench warfare.
Pinkston, Mack and Lauvao in the middle with Joe Thomas and Pashos on the outside would be one of the biggest and definitely the strongest lines in the league. Only question will be is Pinkston ready to take over for Steiny.
I don't think that that's a position you want to throw a guy into the fire at, but if the situation dictates that he is, then that's what it has to be.
I'd rather it be Guard than Tackle and Center.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I watched the Packers game last night again (missed most of 2nd half due to storms first time around) and I was blown away with the battle between Pinkston and the DE for the Packers. Incredible trench warfare.
Pinkston, Mack and Lauvao in the middle with Joe Thomas and Pashos on the outside would be one of the biggest and definitely the strongest lines in the league. Only question will be is Pinkston ready to take over for Steiny.
I don't think that that's a position you want to throw a guy into the fire at, but if the situation dictates that he is, then that's what it has to be.
I'd rather it be Guard than Tackle and Center.
Experience is not something so easily replaced and what you might gain in a physical aspect you give up some in a mental one.
I would rather he had time to develop behind Stieny.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850 |
Quote:
I would rather he had time to develop behind Stieny.
Everyone would "rather" those same sentiments.. but it doesn't always happen that way.. but again.. better it happen at the guard position than center and especially tackle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660 |
by Marty Gitlin - Reading between lines, Steinbach won't play vs. Lions One gets the impression from coach Pat Shurmur's comments about rookie LG Jason Pinkston that starter Eric Steinbach (back) won't play on Friday. Shurmur said Pinkston is in line for increased reps against the Lions. Browns RapidReports
Looks Like we get to see him go up against Suh.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
By Tony Grossi, The Plain Dealer BEREA -- Observations from Browns morning practice ... * Even with reduced practice time and a lighter regimen, this is the period of training camp when injuries are unavoidable. Three Browns didn't make it through the 2 1/2-hour practice in shorts and light pads. First left guard Eric Steinbach walked off the field with a trainer when his back acted up. Then it was strong safety T.J. Ward leaving with a tight hamstring. After the practice, Ward said he didn't know the extent and was going to find out. Near the end, running back Peyton Hillis had a hamstring looked at. Rookie Jason Pinkston spent most of the day filling in for Steinbach with the No. 1 offensive line. When Ward got hurt, Mike Adams moved to strong safety and undrafted rookie cornerback James Dockery was the surprise fill-in at free safety. Remember, Usama Young already is out with his own hamstring injury. It's very possible that Pinkston and Dockery will be forced into the starting lineup Friday night against Detroit. * Hillis' injury may result in the first playing time of the summer for Montario Hardesty. Coach Pat Shurmur was noncommital after practice. The Browns have proceeded cautiously with Hardesty, but he has had a full workload for three days in a row. Hardesty wore a wrap over his left calf on Tuesday, but not today. * Shurmur was pleased to have gotten in 50 snaps in the red zone in either 7 on 7 or team drills on Wednesday. Those are the money plays, of course, and the Browns' offense historically has been putrid in those situations. Without charting every play, I would say it sure seemed that about one-half of the plays practiced Wednesday involved tight ends. Evan Moore, Alex Smith and rookie Jordan Cameron took turns hauling in TDs with Benjamin Watson still sidelined with a hamstring injury. * Shurmur spent 10 years with Philadelphia and the last two with St. Louis prior to joining the Browns, but he rarely invokes the names of former players he's coached. He did on Wednesday in a discussion about slot receiver Jordan Norwood. Shurmur compared him favorably to Danny Amendola, who had a career-high 83 catches last season for the Rams. * Shurmur said his starters will play "close to one half" against Detroit on Friday. He said he's most interested in seeing his No. 1 lines get in at least 20 plays. They were on the field for about 16 last week against Green Bay. web page
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660 |
Quote:
(On James Dockery playing safety)- “I think in this game you may see him playing a little bit of safety. He’s shown up well at corner, that’s where he plays. Much like any back-up role player, you’ve got to get it done on special teams and then you have to be somewhat flexible. For a guy that’s caught our eye in some ways, to be able to line up at safety, I think is a good thing.”
Press conference transcript 8/17
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,289
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,289 |
Quote:
so glad ur not in the front office.
Why do feel the need to say that? Can you not have a discussion without trying to insult the other opinion?
Quote:
In our situation developing a guy like Brown is a LOT easier to do b/c Wallace needs no coaching. He already knows the system. You say it would be best to just cut the 3rd string guy, and if we ever need one, just pick up a vet off the street. :smh: So u have 2 options..
Not cut "THE third string guy". Cut THIS 3rd string guy. Big difference. I gave you the perfect example of when I think we should "save" a roster spot for the 3rd guy. If you disagree, then disagree. Your comment makes it seem as if you did not read - or understand - the point I am making about THIS 3rd string guy and the many other UDFAs currently trying out.
Quote:
1) Play a guy who is young, and give him the opportunity to see what he has.
2) Play a guy who will only get hired to manage a game because he doesn't know the offense, so the game plan will be sugar coated, and then at best will only keep the game close, and then probably lose at the end. If you can pick this guy off the street ANY time, then he probably isn't that good to begin with, which is the reason he is not on a team.
To point #1: J Brown is an undrafted and exceptionally raw QB. Play him in pre-season and TC to see what he's got. If he actually IS right now what he appears to be, there is almost no risk in putting him on the PS. That is where he gets his opportunity to show what he's got.
To point #2: We aren't going to win the division this year. It is my opinion that J Brown will not "sniff the field" as you said. If Colt breaks his leg tomorrow...Wallace goes to #1...Otto Graham/Bernie Kosar/Frank Ryan goes to #2...and J Brown remains at #3. So why bother "saving" a roster spot when there is little to no risk of someone stealing him ala L Asante or Don Carey?
Colt was a promising 3rd QB...he was likely to get a chance to compete because he has the pedigree, the tools, the game, and the experience to become a starter in the league. J Brown is not THAT guy...not even close.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850 |
Quote:
Why do feel the need to say that? Can you not have a discussion without trying to insult the other opinion?
Sorry. Didn't mean to offend u. 
Quote:
Not cut "THE third string guy". Cut THIS 3rd string guy. Big difference. I gave you the perfect example of when I think we should "save" a roster spot for the 3rd guy. If you disagree, then disagree. Your comment makes it seem as if you did not read - or understand - the point I am making about THIS 3rd string guy and the many other UDFAs currently trying out.
What is it that you don't like about Brown to make you want to cut him?
Quote:
To point #1: J Brown is an undrafted and exceptionally raw QB. Play him in pre-season and TC to see what he's got. If he actually IS right now what he appears to be, there is almost no risk in putting him on the PS. That is where he gets his opportunity to show what he's got.
Why do u say he's an exceptionally raw QB? like he just started playing QB? And from the reports in training camp, the coaches like Brown, and like what he brings as a QB.
Quote:
To point #2: We aren't going to win the division this year. It is my opinion that J Brown will not "sniff the field" as you said. If Colt breaks his leg tomorrow...Wallace goes to #1...Otto Graham/Bernie Kosar/Frank Ryan goes to #2...and J Brown remains at #3. So why bother "saving" a roster spot when there is little to no risk of someone stealing him ala L Asante or Don Carey?
What does winning the division have to do with anything? and a lot of 3rd QB's dont sniff the field, but still doesn't mean an injury can't happen to where they are not needed. Bringing in a guy off the street and playing him over Brown IMO doesn't mean that Brown isn't being coached up. Some guys take a lil bit longer time to show their true worth. And u mention saving people that were DRAFTED.. big difference from trying to save someone who wasnt like an Armond Smith.
Quote:
Colt was a promising 3rd QB...he was likely to get a chance to compete because he has the pedigree, the tools, the game, and the experience to become a starter in the league. J Brown is not THAT guy...not even close.
Colt was drafted in the 3rd round, and was specifically picked by Holmgren (reportedly). The intentions were for him to not play his first year, so he was placed behind TWO veterans. Most QB's that get drafted in Day 1 or 2 are normally automatically put as the 2nd QB. Colt was a special case in that we had both Delhomme and Wallace. You put a young guy at the 3rd spot to groom them. Maybe he becomes something, maybe not.. but if they see a little talent, it could set some things up in the future. Wallace isn't getting any younger, and u never know.. He could turn into something and be used in a trade for draft picks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,289
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,289 |
Quote:
What is it that you don't like about Brown to make you want to cut him?
I think we could easily get him to our practice squad and save a roster spot. That is it. The rest of the evaluation comes back to that opinion.
Quote:
Why do u say he's an exceptionally raw QB? like he just started playing QB? And from the reports in training camp, the coaches like Brown, and like what he brings as a QB.
He played at West Virginia, wasn't at all special, and was undrafted...most guys who are undrafted are undrafted for a reason...especially QBs. There are exceptions of course - and I do not think he is one of them.
All reports on him talk about his arm strength...and that's about it. He looked very raw in the first pre-season game.
He is not likley on anyone's radar but ours.
Quote:
And u mention saving people that were DRAFTED.. big difference from trying to save someone who wasnt like an Armond Smith.
I did not say "save someone who was drafted". I said J Brown was undrafted and not currently a special QB talent. See above comment about undrafted players...especially QBs.
A Smith - who was also undrafted and likely for a reason - has a special talent that is somewhat rare and in an area of needed upgrade for us. Can't say that about J Brown.
Look...I am less 'down' on J Brown than I am 'up' on saving a roster spot for yet another developmental player who just might be called on to contribute this year and/or save a spot where we are shaky to start the year.
We may be shaky at RB due to Hardesty...shaky at CB due to S Brown simply because of his age (NOT because he got beat for a TD the other day)...shaky at OL because Yates retired...may need a roster spot while Mo Mass and C Mitchell get better...may need a roster spot while U Young gets better.
Those guys - coupled with my comments above - make the 3rd QB spot on THIS team and with THAT guy a roster spot that I would use elsewhere before cutting say...C Mitchell because his finger isn't ready and Mo Mass just started practicing, we don't want to IR Mitchell, and we don't think we can go without that last WR to start the year. Add to that my opinion that J Brown sails unnoticed to our practice squad and there you have it.
"Shaky" becomes "hole" very quickly. If we weren't shaky in so many spots, we could go with one less RB, OL, DB etc and afford to keep a guy like J Brown on the 53. If we weren't shaky at so many spots, I would think we would have a shot at winning the division.
Again...it's less about J Brown and more about the other question marks we have + the fact that J Brown isn't anywhere near a Colt McCoy-type prospect. If we keep J Brown, I hope it's because we think he could make Wallace trade-able next year or the following year...but I don't see that happening.
To that end, I think Wallace becomes our Charlie Batch. A guy who is not quite good enough to be a starter but could be a #2 QB for a very long time...and a good one at that. If that happens, we will go through a bunch of #3 guys until we hit on one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850 |
Quote:
I did not say "save someone who was drafted". I said J Brown was undrafted and not currently a special QB talent. See above comment about undrafted players...especially QBs.
u mentioned Asante and Carey.. those were drafted players who we tried to get on the practice squad...
but not about to go back and forth with you. teams keep 3 QB's for a reason.. we'll just have to wait and see if Shurmur does the same, which I'm sure he will.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,289
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,289 |
Quote:
u mentioned Asante and Carey.. those were drafted players who we tried to get on the practice squad...
They were drafted players. But I mentioned them because they were players who were well-known, had certain talent, played a position where we needed help, and got cut over other players who brought lesser value -Ventrone, Sorensen.
Had we cut Sorensen, he'd still be there at the bye week if we needed to pick him up because no other team but Mangini's was going to roster that guy. Had we cut Ventrone, he would have whistled to the practice squad completey unnoticed and been there later if we needed him.
I did not mention them because they were "drafted". But I can see how one could infer that.
Quote:
but not about to go back and forth with you. teams keep 3 QB's for a reason.. we'll just have to wait and see if Shurmur does the same, which I'm sure he will.
I am well aware of that fact and likely outcome. It won't bother me too much because those guys know a lot more than I do. However, if they cut a guy like Mitchell so we can keep J Brown, I will be back to voice my displeasure. Surely Holmgren, Heckert, & Shurmur will not care or know what I think.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
Transcript: Browns head coach Pat Shurmur, 8/17 FS Ohio Staff Reports August 17, 2011 (Opening statement)- “We had a good practice this morning. We did a lot of red zone, tried to keep the same format as we did a week ago. I took the pads off the guys this morning. We just worked in helmets and protective spider pads. I feel like we got a lot of work done. Today’s practice, (Eric) Steinbach’s back tightened up on him a little bit so we took him in side, just precautionary. T.J. Ward felt his hamstring a little bit, again, precautionary there. Peyton Hillis, at the end of practice, felt his hamstring just a little bit. This is the time of year when you start to get some soft tissue injuries. I wouldn’t call those injuries yet, there was a lot of work that got done so it was just precautionary with T.J. and Peyton. Otherwise, it was good work. We got 50 snaps in the red zone today, which is good, between 7-on-7 and team. That’s a very important part of the game, being successful there whether you’re scoring touchdowns or preventing the scores. I felt like that competition was good.” (On preparing for the season and preparing for roster cuts at the same time)- “As far as preparing the team, we try to get better each day at something. Today was red zone. We did some base as well. You teach the schemes and as you’re teaching the schemes and running the plays you see how your players fit so that’s part of it. As far as evaluating who the team is, at the end here, their competition and how they perform really direct us to what’s going to happen there. As fans, you could pick out a few guys who are definitely going to make it, but at the bottom part of the roster there’s some good competition right now.” (On the next step he wants to take in the upcoming preseason game)- “You want to build on the last game. We’re looking generally for efficiency, guys to perform well, eliminate the mistakes and then move forward in terms of the details of the plays that we’re running. That’s what you’re looking for. You’re looking for some consistency and efficiency, and you want to see the guys perform well. When the situations dictate it, you’d like to see guys step up and make plays.” (On if there’s a position group that will sort itself out own its own through preseason games)- “I think in all the position groups there is something that we take away each preseason game. We’re in a situation right now where we have a couple linebackers that are dealing with some minor injuries. Those guys that step up and play, naturally, we’ll get to see them more than we would if they weren’t. That’s one position. You’re’ always looking at the skill positions. Then what you want to do is see how your draft picks are developing, the younger players. It’s a long winded answer to your question, but I think that’s what you’re looking for.” (On if he has seen any affects from the lockout)- “I don’t know. I think we’re kind of into this thing, close to three weeks in. We’re all kind of feeling the same things. Their legs are tired, but there’s a certain amount of work that we need to get in. I would say they’re fighting through it pretty well. The overwhelmingly majority of the guys are doing a good job of taking care of their bodies between practices. From that standpoint, it’s probably hard for me to compare because I wasn’t with this crew a year ago. That’s where I’d have a better feel maybe next year.” (On Owen Marecic and the fullback catching passes out of the backfield)- “I think the fullback needs to be able to catch the football. That’s a position that promotes and lends toughness to your offense because they have to lead block. They’re asked to do a lot of things from the backfield that you require from linemen and guys on the line of scrimmage. But, then you add the added piece of being able to catch the football and then we’ll hand it to him as well. That’s a multi-dimensional position when it comes to playing offense.” (On how Marecic has performed thus far)- “I think he’s done a good job. Owen’s one of those steady as you go guys. If you’re not looking real hard, he doesn’t say much. His demeanor’s very quiet, but he takes it in and when you watch him, he makes very few mistakes. He gives great effort and I think he’s progressing well.” (On Jason Pinkston stepping in for Steinbach)- “He’s in there and he’s ready to go. Depending on this weekend, he’ll get more work than he might of had Steinbach not developed this back-whatever, we’ll see.” (On how much the starters will play and if the game plan will be similar)- “The starters, without saying it definitively, I think the starters will play close to a half. The starting lines played about 16 plays last week and I’d like to see them play up into the 20’s. That would be good. As far as game planning, we always game plan where we do what we do well and there’s always things in the game plan that attack the defense we face. I think that it’s going to be no different than any other game.” (On if they are looking for anything specific to work on)- “We’re looking to work on things, but you’re not going to see 10 flea-flickers and halfback passes, maybe one. But, there are certain things we’re looking to get. We want to see the guys execute the fundamentals of the offense. That doesn’t understate the fact that we spent time in the offseason and the last couple days preparing for this game.” (On Jordan Norwood’s skills in the pass game and return game and if he has caught his eye)- “He has. Last year, I was with a guy named Danny Amendola. Let’s forget their size and stature for a minute. That same type of skill set, finds a way to get open. He’s very smart. We lined him up today at the flanker, the X and in the slot. He’s very smart. Typical, if he’s lined up with another receiver out there, he determines on and off. He’s doing a nice job and then you add the return piece on to it. I think he’s doing good.” (On James Dockery playing safety)- “I think in this game you may see him playing a little bit of safety. He’s shown up well at corner, that’s where he plays. Much like any back-up role player, you’ve got to get it done on special teams and then you have to be somewhat flexible. For a guy that’s caught our eye in some ways, to be able to line up at safety, I think is a good thing.” (On evaluating his defense)- “I was pleased with the way they played. There was a lot of good physical play. We played a lot of man coverage. You didn’t see guys running wide open. I thought the coverage was tight. For the most part, the receivers were challenged and we did create some pressure and disrupt the quarterback. Those were all good things. I’m pleased with where they’ve come in less than three weeks.” (On Kaluka Maiava stepping up)- “He’s one of those guys that’s benefitting from the reps. He’s probably known as a special team’s type guy that’s a backup player, but he’s stepped in and done a nice job. I feel like he can play on scrimmage downs and most likely he will.” (On Maiava’s size)- “When you step up on him, he’s not tall, but he’s got some size to him which is evident when you get real close to him.” (On if the second game is the midway point for training camp)- “I wouldn’t consider it the hump because the third preseason game is a game where we’ll play the number one units or the guys that we feel are starters even more than a half. I wouldn’t consider it the hump as a half way part of the preseason games. When you play the preseason game it’s exciting. But, once the game is over and you get them back out here, it was just a fancy practice in the midst of training camp. As you evaluate it after the fact, we play Friday and were in here on Sunday practicing then we’re right into training camp mode. I wouldn’t call it the hump, but there’s some light at the end of the tunnel in terms of getting your team ready for the first game.” (On guys at the bottom of the roster getting their last chance to play in the preseason games)- “Typically, the fourth preseason game, they play the whole game. It’s where you need to really start picking up the pace if you’re going to have a chance to make it.” (On what was said after Jarrett Brown threw an interception against Green Bay)- “There’s reasons for everything and I think he would agree you can’t throw that ball. It was a corner route and a defender was underneath it so you just pump fake it and try and run to get a couple yards. If you can’t run then you throw it away. That’s what you say. Then you say, ‘Now that’s over so let’s go onto the next one.’ That’s what you do. Unfortunately, every once in awhile a quarterback is going to have a bad play. The key is to not put two together. What I liked about what he did though was he came out after that and really managed, very well, a four-minute drive that melted a lot of clock and put us in position to kick a field goal and make it a two-score lead. From that standpoint, I thought he did a good job.” (On working on split back formations)- “I like running the ball and throwing the ball out of split backs. That could be a fullback and a halfback or it could be two halfbacks. We train them that way. We have a solid portion of our offense that’s a two back set. It just showed up today, there were certain things we were working on and our progression of putting the plays in. We were working on that a little bit more today than you’ve seen in the last couple.” (On running that formation anywhere on the football field)- “We can do it coming out all the way to going in. The situation dictates you can it anywhere.” (On if Montario Hardesty will play Friday)- “Still haven’t finally decided on that. Tonight’s the night we’re we really zero in on who’s available and who’s going to play and how much.” (On if Ndamukong Suh commands a lot of attention even in a preseason game)- “Doesn’t matter, when there are good players out there, they’ll get your attention. Obviously, if you’re going to have success against Detroit, you have to block that front. He’s an outstanding player one of the finest in the league, but he’s only one of a bunch of very talented guys on that defense.” web page
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850 |
Quote:
I am well aware of that fact and likely outcome. It won't bother me too much because those guys know a lot more than I do. However, if they cut a guy like Mitchell so we can keep J Brown, I will be back to voice my displeasure. Surely Holmgren, Heckert, & Shurmur will not care or know what I think.
yea.. if they cut Mitchell.. I'm going to be pissed right along w/ u.. lol. but can't say i'd be mad at Brown making the team.. I'd probably look at some guys in the trenches..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,510 |
Just a general reply:
We will keep 3 QB. The rules make it senseless not to. It's not going to be "at the expense" of anyone or any other position ....... it's because we will keep 3 QBs. If we don't keep this QB, then we'll get a different one to take his place.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024 |
Quote:
Just a general reply:
We will keep 3 QB. The rules make it senseless not to. It's not going to be "at the expense" of anyone or any other position ....... it's because we will keep 3 QBs. If we don't keep this QB, then we'll get a different one to take his place.
That answers my question the best.
Thanks.
LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Camp Discussions
|
|