Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Quote:

Quarterback

1. Andrew Luck, Stanford
2. Robert Griffin III, Baylor
3. Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M

It's far too early in the process to apply rankings after the top three quarterbacks, but there are plenty of other signal-callers to keep an eye on. Some will be easier to evaluate than others:

Trust the process:

Brandon Weeden, Oklahoma State
Nick Foles, Arizona
Brock Osweiler, Arizona State
Kirk Cousins, Michigan State
Ryan Lindley, San Diego State

Figure them out:

Russell Wilson, Wisconsin
Kellen Moore, Boise State
Running Back

1. Trent Richardson, Alabama
2. David Wilson, Virginia Tech
3. Lamar Miller, Miami (FL)
4. Doug Martin, Boise State
5. LaMichael James, Oregon
Wide Receiver

1. Justin Blackmon, Oklahoma State
2. Michael Floyd, Notre Dame
3. Kendall Wright, Baylor
4. Alshon Jeffery, South Carolina
5. Chris Givens, Wake Forest
Tight End

1. Dwayne Allen, Clemson
2. Coby Fleener, Stanford
3. Orson Charles, Georgia
4. Ladarius Green, Louisiana-Lafayette
5. Michael Egnew, Missouri
Linemen make early impression
On Senior Bowl week, Pat Kirwan takes a look at some offensive and defensive linemen and finds several who could be ready to produce early in their NFL careers. More ...
Tackle

1. Riley Reiff, Iowa
2. Matt Kalil, USC
3. Jonathan Martin, Stanford
4. Mike Adams, Ohio State
T-5. James Brown, Troy
T-5. Zebrie Sanders, Florida State
Interior Offensive Lineman

1. David DeCastro, Stanford
2. Peter Konz, Wisconsin
3. Kevin Zeitler, Wisconsin
4. Cordy Glenn, Georgia
5. Kelechi Osemele, Iowa State
Defensive End

1. Quinton Coples, North Carolina
2. Melvin Ingram, South Carolina
3. Whitney Mercilus, Illinois
4. Nick Perry, USC
T-5. Chandler Jones, Syracuse
T-5. Andre Branch, Clemson

Defensive Tackle

1. Devon Still, Penn State
2. Jerel Worthy, Michigan State
3. Michael Brockers, LSU
4. Brandon Thompson, Clemson
T-5. Fletcher Cox, Mississippi State
T-5. Dontari Poe, Memphis
Linebacker

1. Courtney Upshaw, Alabama
2. Luke Kuechly, Boston College
3. Dont'a Hightower, Alabama
4. Zach Brown, North Carolina
5. Vontaze Burfict, Arizona State
Cornerback

1. Morris Claiborne, LSU
2. Janoris Jenkins, North Alabama
3. Alfonzo Dennard, Nebraska
4. Leonard Johnson, Iowa State
5. Dre Kirkpatrick, Alabama
Safety

1. Mark Barron, Alabama
2. Harrison Smith, Notre Dame
3. George Iloka, Boise State
4. Markelle Martin, Oklahoma State
T-5. Janzen Jackson, McNeese State
T-5. Antonio Allen, South Carolina




NFL.com

A few notes:

I can't believe that Russell Wilson is shorter than Kellen Moore.

I haven't seen the Virginia Tech running back ranked this high.

This is the only place where I've seen Reiff ranked ahead Kalil.

Surprised to see Coples ranked so high everywhere. Most people on this board don't like him.

I think Upshaw could be a pretty good defensive end.

Dre Kirkpatrick ranked fifth suprises me as he is ranked second in most places. I think Janoris Jenkins could be a good value pick if teams stay away from him.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

Surprised to see Coples ranked so high everywhere. Most people on this board don't like him.




I don't think that it's that most people on this board don't like him. I think that most prefer to go offense with the early picks. They think that the offense needs an instant infusion of talent on that side of the ball. Coples would be simply a casualty of those desires.

Quote:

I think Upshaw could be a pretty good defensive end.




We'll have to see. I won't make any claims to someone that could be a hybrid LB/DE.

Quote:

Dre Kirkpatrick ranked fifth suprises me as he is ranked second in most places. I think Janoris Jenkins could be a good value pick if teams stay away from him.




He's got legal issues (marijuana) that has caused his stock to take a hit.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Quote:

He's got legal issues (marijuana) that has caused his stock to take a hit. v




I know, but he is very talented and teams might pass on him because of his off the field problems (i.e. Eric Wright). I don't think he will be there for our 2nd rounder, but I wouldn't be mad if we took him.

Quote:

We'll have to see. I won't make any claims to someone that could be a hybrid LB/DE.




He played a lot with his hand in he ground at Alabama and he is bigger than Jabaal Sheard.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Quote:

Surprised to see Coples ranked so high everywhere. Most people on this board don't like him.




If you put a Giants jersey on him he would fit right in and look the part. They guy is big, tall, long armed, lean and looks like Julius Peppers.

You gotta want it though and too many times it looks like he just doesn't want it.

I stay far far away from those type of players in the first round. I wouldn't take him with #22.

He should have been absolutely dominant this year. Instead I saw a guy who let himself get blocked. Absolute dud.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

I know, but he is very talented and teams might pass on him because of his off the field problems (i.e. Eric Wright). I don't think he will be there for our 2nd rounder, but I wouldn't be mad if we took him.




I'd stay away from him altogether for the marijuana charge.

Quote:

He played a lot with his hand in he ground at Alabama and he is bigger than Jabaal Sheard.




I'm just telling you that I'm not sure which position they would take him for.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Quote:

You gotta want it though and too many times it looks like he just doesn't want it.

I stay far far away from those type of players in the first round. I wouldn't take him with #22.




I disagree, I would take him at 22. Just a matter of sheer potential.

But I agree, the game I watched him play, he just didn't show the passion I wanted in a player. UNC really needed him in that bowl game, and he was nowhere to be found


But if he did look like a Julius Peppers, we'd be all over him at 4. So I disagree with the assessment that we want offense in 4 so we're not looking at him. Browns definitely need a DE more than CB, yet plenty of people talk about Claiborne. So, that's a foolish assessment to me
-------------------------------------------------------
As for the ratings, I like Mayock a lot. He usually does a good job explaining why he feels the way he does about a player (sometimes gets a little weird with it though, especially with the measurables......), but I definitely like him more than Kiper and McShay. So i'll take a better look at these ratings than others


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,590
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,590
We could always be evaluating a guy like him (not that we wouldn't eval. all of them anyways) for a trade down? Move down to 6 - 10 or so. Pick up another 2nd and a first next year.

Come back with a guy like Coples at around 6 to 10. Come right back with the top WR who has speed at 22. use the two 2nds and the third on a combination of RB, RT, and CB.

We would still have the questions at QB but DL would be set for the better part of a decade. we would still need a free safety and a LB but we could pick those up in the fourth. Defense is complete.

We would also have added another piece to the Oline and gotten weapons in a WR and RB.

Plus ... we still have another 5 picks or so in rounds 5-7 plus compensatory ... and we would also have another first heading into 2013....

As much as I wouldn't want to "pass up" on a guy like blackmon or claiborne ...

when you include value in the trade I would rather have Coples + 2nd + 2013 1st if a team wanted Griffin or whoever then JUST get claiborne or blackmon.


"Believe deep down in your heart that you're destined to do great things."

@pstu24
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Mayock can justify his opinions, and I respect him for that, but I think he is bat-ass crazy half the time.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,557
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,557
coples has a slow first step but he can beat the slower footed college tackles on occasion. He doesnt have good burst off the edge. He is big and strong and he looks the part and I am sure he will be an absolute beast in the CFL in 3 years. I just do not believe he has the motor.

Its like everyone blowing up Zach Brown. He is fast but what has he done? Where is the productiion? He has zero instincts. Dude is freaking Chaun Thompson made over.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
UNC has like 5 or 6 draftable defense prospects in this draft...2 of them are projected in the top 50 or even 1st round..and still, their defense was total crap for most of the season and for sure in their Bowl game, so something's fishy

I probably like Coples the most on here, simply because of potential, but I've paddled back on him since he isn't a good RDE fit and is a boom or bust we can't afford (I accept boom or bust only at QB in the top 10)

On topic: never been a big Mayock fan, especially his rankings...he has a decent TV delivery though, I'll give him that...he can sell...not so sure he knows what he's looking at though


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
wasn't the Mario Williams NC State team the same way? yes, just looked it up here:
http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/fulldra...amp;type=school

Mario #1
Manny Lawson #22 - SF OLB
John McCargo #26 - Bills DT
Stephen Tulloch #116 (4th) - Titans LB
Marcus Hudson #192 (6th) - SF DB


So, Mario, Manny and Tulloch hit well. McCargo has been a bust (though still with TB apparently) and Hudson hung around for 5 years as a backup DB from his 6th round selection (didn't play this season).

Not too shabby for a defense that was average that year.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
S
Legend
Offline
Legend
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
wow Reiff above Kalil? This is a first I have seen. Most of these mocks have Kalil going in the top 5, even a bunch top 3.

I have to admit I haven't seen a ton of Reiff, just because I didn't watch much Iowa football, but I have seen plenty of USC this year, and I think Kalil has a chance to be pretty damn good.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:

wow Reiff above Kalil? This is a first I have seen. Most of these mocks have Kalil going in the top 5, even a bunch top 3.

I have to admit I haven't seen a ton of Reiff, just because I didn't watch much Iowa football, but I have seen plenty of USC this year, and I think Kalil has a chance to be pretty damn good.




Everyone has their personal own preference, but both I think are consensus top 10 prospects in this years pool.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,839
1
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
1
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,839
If hes there draft Kalil, pay him left tackle money, play him right side and we are set on the line. #22 best available WR or DE.

It'd do more good than RG3 who will run himself into injuries in no time flat.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
I can't disagree with your idea if you're saying that Kalil is the BPA in that spot (Luck, RG3 gone via trade-up and then Blackmon/Claiborne are next). Shoring up the RT spot would be awesome, heck...shoring up any position with the #4 pick would be awesome too. I guess the only argument is if Kalil is truly the BPA in that situation....assuming Blackmon or Claiborne are there too.

I've always felt skill positions (QB, RB, WR, TE, CB, LB) are the meat and flashy condiments of the burger.....but you can't eat them without a proper bun. And the bun represents the offensive and defensive lines. Without them, the lines/bun, the team/sandwich aren't worth a damn.

The one thing I really like about the Giants and the Bears team that went to the Super Bowl a few years back, their defensive front-4 is able to get pressure by sending 4 guys. That's crazy. And it caused chaos and panic for every them they played.

And then you look at teams with a strong offensive lines (current Pats and the Cowboys dynasty of the late 90's). They gave the RB and QB time to make plays. As good as Aikman and E.Smith was, nobody gives them much credit for carrying that team. They all talk about the O-line paving the way. And look at Tom Brady....he has 6-7 seconds on every play to find an open receiver (it doesn't hurt to have all those nice weapons - but for the most part of his career, he's had role players catching his passes).

What I'm saying, obviously, build the lines on both side and give the skill guys time to make plays. Pressure the QB/clog running lanes on D and then open running lanes/give the QB time to find open WRs. Done.

I need to change my sig back to "Build the lines and the wins will come."


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Quote:

If hes there draft Kalil, pay him left tackle money, play him right side and we are set on the line.





So you wanna draft (our #4 no less) and convert a LT to a RT? How many times has this came up on this board? How risky it was to draft a DE & convert him to LB to suit our 3-4? And that's in the middle 1st to even 2nd round. Now you want to use a top #5 pick to take a chance on that?

Wow


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
S
Legend
Offline
Legend
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Honestly, if we were going to draft an OL in the first round, I'd rather have that nice fellow from Stanford, as an interior guard, God knows we could use a few of those.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Quote:

We could always be evaluating a guy like him (not that we wouldn't eval. all of them anyways) for a trade down? Move down to 6 - 10 or so. Pick up another 2nd and a first next year.


when you include value in the trade I would rather have Coples + 2nd + 2013 1st if a team wanted Griffin or whoever then JUST get claiborne or blackmon.




Thats just going to be hard for me to beleive that could happen. A trade from 4 to, 6-10, or even 13 area, is just a drop of a few spots . here

down 4-10. even value, a high 2nd round 40ish, plus a 4th this year. plus their 10th overall

a high 2nd and a 2nd next year, is a little bit better, good value, the bad is you have to wait till next year for the 2nd pick

Noway anyone gives up 2 firsts to move up 5 spots for #4, not even the Browns are stupid enough to do that. It would have to be #1, maybe 2 overall.

to move up 5 spots, most wouldn't give u their 1st, 2nd, and 3rd this year.
So maybe ask for their 1st, 2nd next year, and 3rd this year. best possible value.
If you want another 2nd and a 1st next year, you're going to have to move almost out of the 1st entirely, even later than the 22.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Quote:

So you wanna draft (our #4 no less) and convert a LT to a RT? How many times has this came up on this board? How risky it was to draft a DE & convert him to LB to suit our 3-4? And that's in the middle 1st to even 2nd round. Now you want to use a top #5 pick to take a chance on that?

Wow




LT's are converted to RT's all the time in the NFL............ Who's that LT on the Panthers, Jordan Gross. He started as a RT. Bryan Buluaga, LT moved to RT.

Very normal, nothing like a transition you're talking about. RT is usually easier because the speed edge rushers usually don't line up on that side, and when they do the QB can see them unlike a blindside rusher

So you're the one who doesn't know what they're talking about


EDIT: In college Sheard played on the other side of the D-Line than he did this year. He seemed to do just fine didn't he?

Last edited by PeteyDangerous; 01/27/12 11:43 AM.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:

Quote:

So you wanna draft (our #4 no less) and convert a LT to a RT? How many times has this came up on this board? How risky it was to draft a DE & convert him to LB to suit our 3-4? And that's in the middle 1st to even 2nd round. Now you want to use a top #5 pick to take a chance on that?

Wow




LT's are converted to RT's all the time in the NFL............ Who's that LT on the Panthers, Jordan Gross. He started as a RT. Bryan Buluaga, LT moved to RT.

Very normal, nothing like a transition you're talking about. RT is usually easier because the speed edge rushers usually don't line up on that side, and when they do the QB can see them unlike a blindside rusher

So you're the one who doesn't know what they're talking about


EDIT: In college Sheard played on the other side of the D-Line than he did this year. He seemed to do just fine didn't he?




Only after Greg Romeus went down with injury. Sheard also played some DT his senior year IIRC.

Yes many College LT's have become a RT in the League ... And some RT's have made the switch to LT.
Hairston from Clemson, started the whole season as the Bills rookie LT.

I thought he would make a good RT and maybe he will move back their at some point, but for a mid round former RT to start his rookie year off at LT was pretty miraculous (and also pretty rare) imo.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
I think it is all a moot point as Kalil will not be around when we pick.

Reiff seems more suited to play right tackle to me (if I wrong let me know).

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802
Therein lies the caveat to drafting a Kalil or other top LT prospect and moving him to the right. Yeah, it's supposed to be easier to pass protect on the right side because the speedier rusher typically isn't there, but at the same time you need a guy with just a little more bulk on the right side if you want push in the running game or to not be bullrushed by the bigger strongside DEs. The worst part of a decision to draft (just as an example) Kalil at #4 is that once his rookie contract is up, he's not going to be content to just chill for RT money. He'd probably be bolting for free agency seeking top dollar to protect the QBs blindside. It's just not the right value or long-term stable choice to make there, especially considering how devoid we are of play-makers right now.


Politicians are puppets, y'all. Let's get Geppetto!

Formerly 4yikes2yoshi0
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,429
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,429
Thank you...

I'm sure Kalil is going to be an excellent football player, but the guy is an elite LT prospect and we already have Thomas. There are plenty of guys that will convert from LT to RT, but not this one. He will be drafted too high for that to happen.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Quote:


Only after Greg Romeus went down with injury. Sheard also played some DT his senior year IIRC.

Yes many College LT's have become a RT in the League ... And some RT's have made the switch to LT.
Hairston from Clemson, started the whole season as the Bills rookie LT.

I thought he would make a good RT and maybe he will move back their at some point, but for a mid round former RT to start his rookie year off at LT was pretty miraculous (and also pretty rare) imo.




I don't know too much about Sheard in college, that's interesting he play DT too.

I was just trying to make the point to BleedNBrown (or whatever his name is) that the switch isn't uncommon and is not like switching from CB to Safety or DE to 3-4 OLB, or DT to ILB or whatever.

The way he replied to someone's post made it look like the guy he was replying to was crazy using these kind of icons ( ) and from the stuff he said. Yet he was stupid. If we want to draft a could player to play RT, chances are they didn't play RT in college, they played LT (because they're the best tackle on their O-Line and LT blocks the blindside). Our RG played LT in college.

I just thought it was annoying how he was acting like someone else's post was stupid when his post was actually stupid. If we want to draft Kalil or Reif/Riley to play RT, he can probably play RT


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Quote:

It's just not the right value or long-term stable choice to make there, especially considering how devoid we are of play-makers right now.




I agree with this. Just don't give me some stupid post about how the guy can't make the position change. As long as they're big enough (like you pointed out), they can make the position change from LT to RT


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:

I think it is all a moot point as Kalil will not be around when we pick.

Reiff seems more suited to play right tackle to me (if I wrong let me know).




I think both can probably play Left or Right tackle. Both will need to get stronger, but should be able to hold their own and start from day one and let's be honest ... You don't take an OL that high and not expect an instant return.

I am going to take this in a different direction here, but the tend in the League is leaning toward dual threat run and pass type of QB's.

I would like to opine a warning and state my reservations with this impeding trend, because of the risk of injury and the durability issues that comes with, to your QB and the fact that many teams will have to find a second QB with those same traits, we could see the quality of the game degraded by less then stellar play at the position.
Play that we have become accustom too seeing very high standards of and none higher then this year witch included dual threat young guns Cam Newton and Tim Tebow.

They Key is going to be keeping these guys on the field and healthy.

Defensive Coordinators around the League will also adjust to their style of offense and it's going to take Superman to execute and stay healthy in that style of offensive attack.

I love the College game, but I don't want to see the NFL resemble a Sr. League.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Also, Tebow and Newton are giant. Griffin is not.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:

Also, Tebow and Newton are giant. Griffin is not.



Tebow is a run first guy... Newton is pretty balanced.. Griffin is a pass first guy.. so while somebody may consider them all to be dual threats, the way they approach the game is pretty different.


yebat' Putin
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:

Quote:

Also, Tebow and Newton are giant. Griffin is not.



Tebow is a run first guy... Newton is pretty balanced.. Griffin is a pass first guy.. so while somebody may consider them all to be dual threats, the way they approach the game is pretty different.




I agree that they must also be able to be effective passing the ball ... I didn't mean to imply that they where all successful dual threats, that book is still not written.
Regardless my point of emphasis is about the durability issues that are associated with that style of offense at this level.

The risk is going to be high and it's going to take a special talent to be an effective dual threat and only a select few I think will fall into the category as being a successful 'dual threat'.

It took Vick how many years to achieve that status? ... That brings into this discussion another variable that has to be in this debate. How many of these types of QB's coming out of College are going to, one be successful and secondly how many will need time to develop.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:

That brings into this discussion another variable that has to be in this debate. How many of these types of QB's coming out of College are going to, one be successful



More and more as NFL coaches figure out a way to use their talent... A lot of colleges are going to spread offenses, it's only a matter of time before the NFL coaches find a way to make it (or some hybrid of it) work at the next level... they will have no choice as fewer and fewer pure drop back passers are going to be coming out of college.

Quote:

and secondly how many will need time to develop.



I would expect a similar breakdown as you have now.. some will be good right away, some will need to develop and some will never be good. I will say this, if you can run the ball, it will give you more time to develop as a thrower, which is going to be the problem.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Quote:

Its like everyone blowing up Zach Brown. He is fast but what has he done? Where is the productiion? He has zero instincts. Dude is freaking Chaun Thompson made over.




Brown had 13.5 tackles for loss last year. He's a playmaker.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Quote:

Quote:

Its like everyone blowing up Zach Brown. He is fast but what has he done? Where is the productiion? He has zero instincts. Dude is freaking Chaun Thompson made over.




Brown had 13.5 tackles for loss last year. He's a playmaker.




Great, I watched him play when they needed him in that Bowl Game

He was nowhere to be found............. Right when it counted the most, nowhere


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Its like everyone blowing up Zach Brown. He is fast but what has he done? Where is the productiion? He has zero instincts. Dude is freaking Chaun Thompson made over.




Brown had 13.5 tackles for loss last year. He's a playmaker.




Great, I watched him play when they needed him in that Bowl Game

He was nowhere to be found............. Right when it counted the most, nowhere




Basing your entire evaluation on one game is always a terrible idea. Watch at least three.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Quote:

Basing your entire evaluation on one game is always a terrible idea. Watch at least three.




Too late now. I'm not gonna do torrents because I won't upload copy written material.

But, most important game of their season, he doesn't show up. Bad sign


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Quote:

Quote:

Its like everyone blowing up Zach Brown. He is fast but what has he done? Where is the productiion? He has zero instincts. Dude is freaking Chaun Thompson made over.




Brown had 13.5 tackles for loss last year. He's a playmaker.




That ranks him t59th in CFB btw...along with the almighty Tim Fugger from Vandy

He had 1.5 TFL the season before...not exactly "a playmaker"...he's still not completely off my board as I've read some positve reviews from draftniks I respect but still, he's solidly on my "torn" list..it's safe to say that his game is incredibly inconsistent and that he lacks instincts to go with his speed...along with inconsistent toughness and tackling technique and all you have left is a raw speed player


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Don't even think about criticizing Tim Fugger...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Hey, I pimped Fugger as our possible Mr Irrelevant pick weeks ago in the original draft thread...I'd love to have a Fugger at DE on the roster to bury Roethli


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
My point was why would you take a chance on using a top 5 pick just to have to change the position? Sheard is not a good example..because we needed DE's and it didn't matter, we did not draft him for one side only. We all ready have JT so if your going to draft a RT, why not draft a good one that has played the position? That's all I'm saying. I think it's called good value?


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
You guys need to chill out, and quit calling me stupid. If you read what I wrote then you would know that drafting a bigtime LT and moving him over to RT when we have so many holes to fill, and at #4 no less leaves alot to be desired. Go look in the mirror and say that you want to draft the LT and move him to RT and look at your face. Nuff said


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336

Quote:

If you read what I wrote then you would know that drafting a bigtime LT and moving him over to RT when we have so many holes to fill, and at #4 no less leaves alot to be desired.




This is what you wrote

Quote:

So you wanna draft (our #4 no less) and convert a LT to a RT? How many times has this came up on this board? How risky it was to draft a DE & convert him to LB to suit our 3-4? And that's in the middle 1st to even 2nd round. Now you want to use a top #5 pick to take a chance on that?

Wow




Here you compare a LT moving to RT like a DE converting to LB in 3-4. You call changing the position risky. My point, most tackles in the NFL probably played LT in college. Many linemen in the NFL played LT in college. That's because it's the most important position on the offensive line. Joe Thomas in college played LT. Pinkson in college played LT. Our RG in college played LT. I'm willing to but Pashos played LT in college too

It is not as risky as a DE to 3-4 OLB change. And you tried to put someone down and sound like a know it all with things like "Wow" and those stupid faces like this If you want to say, "Getting someone to be a RT for you with your 4th pick is a bad idea because it's too high to pick a RT and the guy will want LT money/to pay LT when his contract is up", that makes more sense.

But instead you're talking about the risk for the position change and you're essentially calling the other poster's post stupid with your emotion icons.


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Page 1 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2013 NFL Season NFL Draft (2013) Mike Mayock's Position Rankings

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5