Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 8 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
Is it just me?

Or is RG III's self-promotion becoming an issue?

Seems like I keep hearing him talking about himself...not something I like.

I think this guy is going to bust.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
From everything I've heard his arm is not a problem.

Quote:

His ability to be successful as a QB?




...in the NFL. You can ask that question about any player though. Griffin has been a successful QB at the college level.

How did I end up being the one defending a guy I don't want to draft?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
Quote:

From everything I've heard his arm is not a problem.

Quote:

His ability to be successful as a QB?




...in the NFL. You can ask that question about any player though. Griffin has been a successful QB at the college level.

How did I end up being the one defending a guy I don't want to draft?




Just debate...it's all good...I'm not seeing you as defending anyone.

I was talking about Newton regarding arm and ability to be successful.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Everyone is self-promoter at this point in the off-season. He's trying to overtake Luck as the #1 pick.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
Quote:

Everyone is self-promoter at this point in the off-season. He's trying to overtake Luck as the #1 pick.




I agree. However...

I'm not hearing anything from Luck...or anyone else for that matter.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,408
Likes: 440
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,408
Likes: 440
Quote:

From everything I've heard his arm is not a problem.

Quote:

His ability to be successful as a QB?




...in the NFL. You can ask that question about any player though. Griffin has been a successful QB at the college level.

How did I end up being the one defending a guy I don't want to draft?




I wouldn't mind getting him. (HEY, all you people that think I'm a Colt guy through and through - did you GET THAT? ) I just don't want to trade too much to get him.

I read - golly, several months ago - don't know when - but an article in Sports Illustrated about Griffin. After reading it, I thought "Now here's a very athletic guy, having success, very smart/intelligent, from a good background (meaning I thought he was well grounded).........I wonder if he'll have success in the nfl?

I still think all of that about him.

Using #4 on him would be a good pick imo.

Unless he becomes like an Owens, or ochocinco, in self promotion - that doesn't bother me.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Quote:

Using #4 on him would be a good pick imo.




As others have said. If you think he is worth the #4 pick, then he is worth trading up for because he is a QB.

If you don't have a QB you have to get one. And trading the 4 and 22 for a franchise QB is not that much to pay for a franchise QB.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
Quote:

Quote:

Using #4 on him would be a good pick imo.




As others have said. If you think he is worth the #4 pick, then he is worth trading up for because he is a QB.

If you don't have a QB you have to get one. And trading the 4 and 22 for a franchise QB is not that much to pay for a franchise QB.




Does anyone believe that he is a shoe-in to be a franchise QB?

I don't think even YTown believes that (Not saying that YOU think so...just sayin')

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
I don't think anyone thinks he is a shoe-in to become a franchise QB. Even Luck isn't a shoe-in, he just has more of a chance than a normal QB prospect would. If RGIII was a shoe-in he would be the #1 pick and Luck would be ours.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Quote:

FORT WORTH, TEXAS: Robert Griffin III is looking forward to sitting down and talking with NFL executives and coaches during the NFL combine.

While they know about Griffin being the first Heisman Trophy winner from Baylor, and all the records and big numbers he put up, the quarterback realizes many still have questions about him and the Bears’ potent spread-formation offense.

“I’m excited to wow them in the interviews with the type of offense that we run, just so they can understand it’s not as simple as some people make our spread out to be. It’s a different kind of spread,” Griffin said. “Although I don’t agree with it, but people say I just burst on the scene this year, so no one knows much about me, whether NFL GMs or analysts, so I get a chance to put my best foot forward.”

Griffin was in Fort Worth on Monday night to accept the Davey O’Brien Award that recognizes the nation’s top quarterback.

When the NFL draft takes place in two months, Griffin wants to be the first quarterback selected even though most projections have Stanford’s Andrew Luck going first overall to the Indianapolis Colts.

“We both want to be the best, we both want to be No. 1. Whether I get drafted first or not, it’s not going to change the way I play,” Griffin said. “All I can say, it’s about motivation. You never want to feel like everybody thinks you’re a sure thing in life because it can rob you of your motivation to go out and get better.”

Griffin insisted he has no hints of what might happen on draft day, but said when he went to Indianapolis during Super Bowl week that fans there were telling him they wanted him to come there. RG3 added that he hopes Peyton Manning stays in Indianapolis, because “he’s a legend and deserves that.”

Along with the interviews later this week at the NFL combine, Griffin plans to run the 40-yard dash and do other drills.

But Griffin said he likely won’t throw in Indianapolis. He will instead save that for his pro day March 21, which has been moved up a day to avoid going at the same time as the pro day for Luck, the Heisman runner-up.

Griffin has been working extensively with quarterback consultant Terry Shea preparing for the NFL combine and his pro day. They have done a lot of work on the dual-threat quarterback’s foot work.

“Just getting used to the type of routes you have to throw at the next level,” Griffin said. “Basically just trying to find the best way to allow my skills to shine, whether that’s my quick release or just my ability to drive the football down the field.

“It’s like a performance when it comes to your pro day and when you’re throwing. It’s exactly like a performance, you’ve just got to memorize the script and go out and execute to the best of your ability,” he said. “Once you get drafted, you can go to your team and learn the grand scheme of things.”

Griffin set or tied 54 school records in 41 games at Baylor, which last season tied a school record with 10 wins — the other 10-win season was in 1980 during Mike Singletary’s senior year. The Bears won their last six games in 2011, and the record-setting 67-56 victory over Washington in the Alamo Bowl was their first bowl victory since 1992.

Griffin is the school’s career passing leader, completing 800 of 1,192 passes (67 percent) for 10,366 yards and 78 touchdowns with 17 interceptions. His 2,254 yards and 33 TDs rushing are records for a Bears quarterback.

Sure, those numbers were made possible by Baylor’s offensive scheme. But Griffin said it was based on plenty of pro-style principles.

“At first glance, they see four or five wide receivers, a lot of motion, a lot of different sets of formations,” Griffin said. “If you take it from that aspect, it’s exactly the same things that the pros do, go two-tight, four wide and two tight ends, and tight end at running back like the Patriots do.”




Akron Beacon Journal

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,976
Likes: 356
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,976
Likes: 356
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Using #4 on him would be a good pick imo.




As others have said. If you think he is worth the #4 pick, then he is worth trading up for because he is a QB.

If you don't have a QB you have to get one. And trading the 4 and 22 for a franchise QB is not that much to pay for a franchise QB.




Does anyone believe that he is a shoe-in to be a franchise QB?

I don't think even YTown believes that (Not saying that YOU think so...just sayin')




I don't think that any player is a shoe-in, ever.

Any player is an injury away from busting. Any player could have some issue that causes then to struggle. A player could have a family issue that causes him problems. He could be in the completely wrong scheme for what he does well. He could be immature, and simply not committed enough to succeed in the NFL. He could just plain not be smart enough to be able to run an offense, or adjust on the fly from positions that require a read/adjust like WR. There could be any number of reasons a player busts.

Even RG3, as I have repeatedly acknowledged, has some bust potential. I happen to think that it is low given his experience, ability to make every throw, and intelligence .... but it is there nonetheless. I also think that he has, quite possibly, the biggest superstar upside of anyone in this draft. I'd take a small chance of busting vs a moderate chance of being a superstar any day.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,408
Likes: 440
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,408
Likes: 440
Quote:


As others have said. If you think he is worth the #4 pick, then he is worth trading up for because he is a QB.




I disagree. I think he's worth a #4. I do NOT think he's worth a #4, a #22, plus. Fairly simple concept really. Is Blackmon worth a 4? Some think so - so, you would say he's worth a #4 and a #22 as well?

I don't care if he's a qb or not. That has no bearing on my opinion.
Quote:



If you don't have a QB you have to get one. And trading the 4 and 22 for a franchise QB is not that much to pay for a franchise QB.




Stop with this "franchise" crap. Please, for the love of GOD - stop with the "franchise" crap!

You have NO idea what he'll be like in the nfl - him, or any other pick.

Quinn was a "franchise" pick. Where's he? In denver, sitting 3rd string and selling out his team.

Smith was a "franchise" pick (alex smith), took him 7 years to do anything?

Ryan Leaf was a "franchise" pick.

Etc etc etc.

We have needs all over. We have picks. If Griffin is there at 4, take him. If not, don't.

Newton was a "franchise" pick. What did he do? Lead his team to 6 wins.

Barkley was a "franchise" pick - till he decided to stay in school.

Harrington, Akili Smith.............the list goes on and on.

There is NO "franchise" pick. Ever.

If the Browns were only a qb away from being a top notch team, I would change my opinion on trading away a bunch of picks. We aren't.

If you lived in a shack and rode a bicycle to work, yet you somehow came into $100,000 - would you blow all that on a car to get to work, while you still lived in a shack?

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Quote:

Is it just me?

Or is RG III's self-promotion becoming an issue?

Seems like I keep hearing him talking about himself...not something I like.

I think this guy is going to bust.




So when people ask him questions about himself, should he talk about Tannehill instead?

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

Quote:

Is it just me?

Or is RG III's self-promotion becoming an issue?

Seems like I keep hearing him talking about himself...not something I like.

I think this guy is going to bust.




So when people ask him questions about himself, should he talk about Tannehill instead?




hmmm, might not be a bad option.

asks him about his touch on the deep ball. so, he brings up tape on the 2nd half in the Aggie game vs. Oklahoma and asks what they think about the touch on Tannehill's deep ball.

asks him about his pocket presense, so he brings up the Aggies game vs. the Longhorns and asks how well they think Tannehill does under pressure.

he might lose some points for disparaging his opponents though


#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Quote:

I don't care if he's a qb or not. That has no bearing on my opinion.




And that's why you lose the argument. No matter what you think, quarterback is more valuable than any other position. There is no, "I agree to disagree" bull crap. It is pretty cut and dry. QB > every other position.

Quote:

Stop with this "franchise" crap. Please, for the love of GOD - stop with the "franchise" crap!

You have NO idea what he'll be like in the nfl - him, or any other pick.




When you draft a player you project what he will be in the future. Some may project RGIII to be a franchise QB. Yes, that happens.

Quote:

If you lived in a shack and rode a bicycle to work, yet you somehow came into $100,000 - would you blow all that on a car to get to work, while you still lived in a shack?




So if we traded #4 and #22 for the #2 that would be blowing everything? Wouldn't we still have the rest of the draft to improve our team? If I'm not mistaken, normally we only have one first round pick so I would just be like any other draft.

Bottom line. Your priorities are messed up. You think QB's aren't more valuable than the other positions. They are. You are wrong.

Jeez man. All this for a player I don't even want to take.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,118
Likes: 134
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,118
Likes: 134
I see your argument on the other issues,, but on the value of a trade up,, we are going to disagree.

If a guy falls to you at 4 and you like him, take him.

if you gotta move up to get him at 2, you will have to give up more than JUST the 4th pick.., You are talking about the 4, 22 and beyond (how far beyond I don't know but some experts are saying it will take the browns first 4 picks of this draft or the first three of this draft and the 1st from next year to move up to get the second pick)

So, what you are giving up to get the second pick is anywhere from 2 to 3 additional high drafts picks this year and potentially next.

And yeah, that will hurt the team in the short run.. and if the guy you get busts,, oh brother.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
Quote:

Is it just me?

Or is RG III's self-promotion becoming an issue?

Seems like I keep hearing him talking about himself...not something I like.

I think this guy is going to bust.




If they ask him about himself, he'll talk about himself. I've heard enough of his interviews that I think it's much more self confidence/swagger than anything else and that's absolutely something I want in a QB. I love that he's taking on Luck as the #1 instead of just sitting back and letting it happen. The key is, when he's talking about his TEAM, he rarely busts into the me me me crap. It's almost always "we" with RGIII. Even when he was talking about his Heisman, he made it sound like it was Baylor's/his teammates' award as much as his own.

I think the more people hear from him, the more they're going to love. He's simply a class act.


We're... we're good?
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
Just a general Question for anyone. If Griffin comes in at 6' even or under 6'1 would it have any bearing on what you think? Right now he is listed as 6'3 and some places I see 6'2. He does have some hair up there.


"Going from 4-12 to 6-10 isn't good enough. I believe we are going to be better than that. We're going to be a lot better than that." - Mike Holmgren (3/15/12)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 59
L
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 59
Quote:

Just a general Question for anyone. If Griffin comes in at 6' even or under 6'1 would it have any bearing on what you think? Right now he is listed as 6'3 and some places I see 6'2. He does have some hair up there.




I've been projecting Griffin at 6'1" flat for awhile - and I think that could hurt him quite a bit for three reasons:

1.) An existing concern is his ability to move under center - lack of height is a much bigger problem there than in the shotgun.

2.) His release point is already quite low.

3.) He does historically have quite a few balls batted down at the line (2-3 per game) - this will only get worse in the NFL.

There's a huge hype machine behind Griffin right now - but I could still envision a Rodgers like fall to the tens or 20s.


~Lyuokdea
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,408
Likes: 440
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,408
Likes: 440
Quote:

Just a general Question for anyone. If Griffin comes in at 6' even or under 6'1 would it have any bearing on what you think? Right now he is listed as 6'3 and some places I see 6'2. He does have some hair up there.




I myself am not sold on the traditional "prototypical" stereo type.

Height can help, but lack of it is not a purely defining "measurable" in my opinion.

I highly doubt he is 6'3". I question 6'2". Even at 6'1" I wouldn't rule someone out.

I don't buy into the whole "you have to be tall to see the receivers" stuff. Granted, you can't be 5'8", that would be a hindrance.

Honestly - the whole "oh, your linemen are 6'5" and you need to be able to see over them " thing - I don't buy into that. Ever seen a lineman stand up straight when he's blocking?

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

Ever seen a lineman stand up straight when he's blocking?




yeah, basically every RT that has started for us not named Ryan Tucker.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,528
Likes: 6
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,528
Likes: 6
I dont think he will fall to far simply because the Redskins love the kid. Shannahan likes that rolling pocket to extend plays and give the receivers time to get open.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,408
Likes: 440
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,408
Likes: 440
Quote:

Quote:

Ever seen a lineman stand up straight when he's blocking?




yeah, basically every RT that has started for us not named Ryan Tucker.




Well............I should've said "ever see a good O lineman standing straight up when blocking." My bad.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
Quote:

Just a general Question for anyone. If Griffin comes in at 6' even or under 6'1 would it have any bearing on what you think? Right now he is listed as 6'3 and some places I see 6'2. He does have some hair up there.




I'm expecting him to come in at 6'1 1/2 which I'd be totally cool with and I'm cautiously optimistic he'll be taller. Anything taller than that is a plus. I think anything under 6'1" would give people a bit of pause and anything at or under 6'0" would be a hit to him although Vick is 6'0" so who knows.

He was listed coming out of HS as 6'3" and in college as 6'2", I can't imagine they inflated his height 2-3 inches on two different occasions.


We're... we're good?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
Quote:

Quote:

Is it just me?

Or is RG III's self-promotion becoming an issue?

Seems like I keep hearing him talking about himself...not something I like.

I think this guy is going to bust.




So when people ask him questions about himself, should he talk about Tannehill instead?




Is there anyone else in this draft besides RG III? One might think not.

Sorry...I still see too much self-promotion for my liking.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
I was just reading one guy saying they are fearful he will come in at 6' or closer to it. Then I just heard Fox just ask a scout if he comes in at 6' and 200 pounds if that will hurt him. I didn't get to hear the answer. Anytime I read that questioned about him they go on to talk about his athletic ability.


"Going from 4-12 to 6-10 isn't good enough. I believe we are going to be better than that. We're going to be a lot better than that." - Mike Holmgren (3/15/12)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Quote:

Just a general Question for anyone. If Griffin comes in at 6' even or under 6'1 would it have any bearing on what you think? Right now he is listed as 6'3 and some places I see 6'2.




No. My opinion of him is from watching him play 6 full games this year and parts of others. Not from a half inch here or there.

Quote:

He does have some hair up there.






Sorry, I don't judge QBs on how much hair they have "up there."

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
Quote:

Quote:

Just a general Question for anyone. If Griffin comes in at 6' even or under 6'1 would it have any bearing on what you think? Right now he is listed as 6'3 and some places I see 6'2.




No. My opinion of him is from watching him play 6 full games this year and parts of others. Not from a half inch here or there.

Quote:

He does have some hair up there.






Sorry, I don't judge QBs on how much hair they have "up there."


Yeah..maybe you judge on how much he has "down there" ..No one asked if you judge a QB on how much hair he has Up there..not sure where your mind is?


"Going from 4-12 to 6-10 isn't good enough. I believe we are going to be better than that. We're going to be a lot better than that." - Mike Holmgren (3/15/12)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,590
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,590
You know I have been thinking about this and I truly think Washington will hold the keys to how the draft shakes out.

My assumption is based on the fact that (regardless of what the Browns WILL do) we can do 1 of three things.

Scenario 1. We can trade UP to try and land Griffin
Scenario 2. We can sit where we are and take him at 4 if he falls (or just go another player)
Scenario 3. We can let him fall to 4 and then trade down so another team can secure him.


IF Washington is out of the picture by signing Manning or Flynn then I say we are really in a great position to not need to move up. St. Louis would need to make a deal with Miami OR Seattle as the only real partners and by then the Elite talent is gone (could happen ... but imagine what St. Louis would want to drop into the 10 or so range instead of taking the second best player).

But, if Washington signs no-one then they are probably going to want Griffin. Do you really think Shannahan wants to go into the season with sexy-rexy as his guy?

To me we will know what we have to do simply by where Manning signs (assuming we know where he goes) and Flynn signs.

There is also the possibility that WE sign Flynn ... but that would also forecast what our plans are pertaining to Griffin.

So as much as we might like or dislike him ... depending on where the QB's sign in Free Agency we will know what will happen. My hope? Manning and Flynn sign with Washington and Miami and then we can either take Griffin at 4

OR we could even trade down to Seattle's pick (11th or 12th subject to coin toss).

Using the almighty see-all-end-all draft chart we can tell that the #4 is 1800 points. If Seattle has the 11th (1250 points) then they also have the 44th (460 points) which puts them at 1710 or about 90 points short. If it's the 12th pick (1200 points) then it's the 45th overall as well (450 points). This puts them at 1650 or about 150 points short. If you factor in the value for QB's then it wouldn't be unreasonable to trade the #4 for the #11 / 12, the #44 / 45, and then demand a first or a second in next years draft as well.

We could still wind up with a pick at 11 or 12 (maybe enough to get Richardson? He MIGHT just fall) and then have an extra pick in the top 45 still as well as adding one next year. OR maybe we use that #11 or 12 on any number of needs. Tannehill (as some on here have fallen in love with him)? How about Reiff / Coples / Mercilus / Martin / Keuchly / or any other one of those "good" players who wouldn't merit the #4 overall selection but could still be great talent while still adding another 2nd and a pick next year?


"Believe deep down in your heart that you're destined to do great things."

@pstu24
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Quote:

Yeah..maybe you judge on how much he has "down there" ..No one asked if you judge a QB on how much hair he has Up there..not sure where your mind is?




I was quoting your post.

I'm sorry, next time I'll include how much hair is "down there" in my scouting report. It's a very important metric.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
Quote:

Quote:

Yeah..maybe you judge on how much he has "down there" ..No one asked if you judge a QB on how much hair he has Up there..not sure where your mind is?




I was quoting your post.

I'm sorry, next time I'll include how much hair is "down there" in my scouting report. It's a very important metric.


You quoted my post and then went on to say you don't judge a QB on how much hair he has up there. That wasn't the question. You answered the question with your first quote. Yeah, you should do that next time..


"Going from 4-12 to 6-10 isn't good enough. I believe we are going to be better than that. We're going to be a lot better than that." - Mike Holmgren (3/15/12)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 87
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 87
Quote:

Quote:

Ever seen a lineman stand up straight when he's blocking?




yeah, basically every RT that has started for us not named Ryan Tucker.




Yeah and there usually left sitting on their keysters


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,976
Likes: 356
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,976
Likes: 356
I posted a picture from the Heismans, and RG3 looked almost exactly the same height as Luck ........ maybe 1/2" shorter, if that .....

I think that Griffin tends to slouch a bit, and that makes him look shorter. I think that he'll come in within 1/2 inch of 6'2". I have also heard a couple of interviews with his former teammates, and they have all said that he is a legit 6'2". I think that Taylor might be one of them.

Also, last year we used Jordan Norwood's father (an assistant coach at Baylor) as a source of information on Taylor before we drafted him. I could see us doing the same with RG3 this year.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 87
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 87
I don't under stand all the hub bub about his height ... The kids at least a smig taller then any QB on our current roster.

I think it's a moot point. Maybe not to every team, but there certainly isn't that bias here in Cleveland.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
This was a good read and I started writing about this earlier. I see a lot of articles and analyst say they will have to adjust some things around Griffin and change things up a bit. I just don't see them changing anything to fit a player in. Anyway..I am interested in finding that Carucci article he referred to.

Brown's face tough decision at QB
I was in Cleveland the day LeBron announced he would be taking his talents to South Beach. I’ve performed music in Cleveland more times than I can count. One of the things I enjoy about touring is getting to meet sports fans of all different teams, and walks of life. In that one day I gained more respect for Cleveland as a fan base than I have for any other in my life.

The sense of absolute misery that overtook everyone – from gas station attendants to elite music promoters and executives – was overwhelming. Even dogs walked around aimlessly, looking like they had been recently kicked. Cleveland is a city that lives vicariously through their professional sports franchises. Win or lose (and there’s been a lot more “lose” both recently and historically) the fans there take it personally. I love that about them.
Now, the Cleveland Browns are at a crossroads. Coming off a disappointing 4-12 season in 2011, the organization is faced with a monumental decision: What to do at quarterback, the league’s most vital position. My friends, my loyal readers, my fellow students of NFL sickness; it is here you will learn that whatever road Cleveland takes from their present situation into the wild blue yonder will come through Central Texas.

Browns QB Colt McCoy needs little introduction around these parts. While at the University of Texas, he broke nearly every Longhorn single-season and career QB record and took home 13 of 15 major QB awards his senior season as a Heisman and national championship finalist. McCoy is tough, gritty, smart, elusive, and accurate which makes up for his “so-so” arm strength. After being drafted in the third round and getting to start in spot duty in 2010, Colt came into the 2011 season as the Browns’ starting QB in a West Coast system that many close to the team thought he was beginning to get a good grasp of. The Browns’ season went on to be hampered by brutal injuries along the offensive line, a constant merry-go-round freak show at the running back position, and a complete lack of playmaking ability at WR. McCoy was lost for the season to a concussion suffered in Pittsburgh during week 13 via an illegal James Harrison hit. When the dust settled on the Browns’ 2011 season, only three numbers really mattered, though: 4, 12, and 0. Four wins, 12 Losses, and zero career wins for Colt McCoy against AFC North division opponents.

There’s a kid from up the road you might have heard of named Robert Griffin III. The Heisman-winning Baylor QB represents most everything a team looking for revitalization on offense could ask for. He has a big arm, he’s smart, he’s a great leader, and he exhibits excellent downfield vision and elite running ability. The best part: He does not rely on his feet to bail him out. Unlike most elite running QBs, he will always look to make the play with his arm first, sometimes taking brutal hits to remain in the pocket until his receiver comes open.

The Browns have two first-round picks in this year’s NFL draft. Pick No. 4 and pick No. 22. I will be attending the NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis next week, and was invited for inclusion in Mike Mayock’s NFL Combine media conference call, where I had a chance to address the Cleveland QB issue. His thoughts were much different from those of NFL writing legend and Senior Editor for the Browns Vic Carucci who we spoke with in Mobile, Ala., earlier this month at the Senior Bowl.

Lets start at the top: The Colts will take Andrew Luck (QB, Stanford) with pick one. Saint Louis picks second. They have too much money tied up in Sam Bradford to even consider a QB. Their reasonable options are as follows: Matt Kalil (OT, USC), Justin Blackmon (WR, Oklahoma State), Morris Claiborne (CB, LSU) or in the best case scenario, trade out of the pick to someone who wants Robert Griffin and accumulate more picks through the very valuable late first, second, and third rounds. The two teams thought to be interested in possibly trading up are the Redskins and the Browns. At pick three, the Vikings would love to have Kalil fall to them, as LT is their single biggest need. If he is not there and Griffin is still on the board, they will try to trade down to a team wanting Griffin as the Vikes reached to draft QB Christian Ponder in last year’s draft. If they cannot trade down and Kalil is gone, I expect them to take Morris Claiborne at this point. Now we come to the Browns at pick four (assuming they did not trade up.) If Griffin is there … should they take him?

I say no.

“We haven’t seen an athlete like RG3 in many drafts,” Mike Mayock, lead draft analyst for the NFL Network told me. “The chance that the Browns may be able to get him, that’s exciting. It will be a ride, that’s for sure. There are a few flaws to his game, mainly lack of anticipation and waiting on plays to develop leading to too many big hits, but the bottom line is the kid is a playmaker.”

To me, the issue is not about Griffin’s playmaking ability or even his ability to be an elite NFL QB. I see the issue as being the system. Browns GM Mike Holgren is a Bill Walsh disciple. He has been building championship variations of the West Coast offense for almost 30 years now. In coming to Cleveland, he put his managerial trust in Head Coach Pat Shurmur who runs what he likes to call a “pure” form of the West Coast offense. Vic Carrucci affirmed our suggestion that there is generally a three-year learning curve for QBs developing into this kind of system. He went on to say that many decision-makers within the organization were beginning to see vast, marked improvement in McCoy’s progression in the system that was cut off too early in 2011 (albeit by only three games).

He said that if he had to prognosticate at this early juncture, that he believes McCoy will come in as the team’s starting QB next season. Carucci told us that the Browns scouting department has done such a bang-up job on the defensive side of the ball (drafting four defensive starters in the last two drafts) that he believed 2012 would be the year that Shurmur would finally get to address some of the offensive issues that have been left largely unanswered.

So I asked Mike Mayock, "Why would an offensive-minded coach (knowing how hard it is to go through a long QB development process) want to risk the possibility of making his hot seat even hotter by throwing in a wild-card uber-athlete at QB with no surrounding weapons?"

“That’s an interesting question – but we saw it all last year. Offenses are showing more and more … Cam Newton, for example. Look at Cam. He comes to Carolina, they build around him. All these guys, Jake Locker [Titans], Christian Ponder [Vikings], if there is one thing we learned last year it is that rookie QBs can come in and contribute," Maycock replied.

"But you said he has no anticipation. I agree. Do you not think that anticipation is important in a timing-based precision West Coast offense in which you must 'throw receivers open' as opposed to 'throwing to open receivers'?" I questioned.

“Yea, and its another one of these deals,” Mayock said. “You have an exceptional player here and a chance you may be able to get him. Childress, Shurmur, you know; they would have to change how they do some things, sure.”

Mike Holmgren doesn’t just “change things”. His staff will not either. Thinking in such broad terms can be messy. Panthers Head Coach Ron Rivera had the luxury of “letting Cam be Cam” on offense because he was a first-year defensive head coach with his hands full trying to fix the heap of garbage Carolina runs on D week in and week out. I see the idea of RG3 to the Browns as one that could create a lot of excitement for a fan base in dire need of some sort of positive spark, but I just don’t like the fit. Holmgren has stated publicly he will be taking a QB in 2012. This is not an indictment on the position or its current standing, just an affirmation of his regime’s “bullpen” mantra in either drafting or signing a new QB each season for depth and seasoning.

I see so many more reasonable options later in the draft. An accurate, smart passer like Kirk Cousins (Michigan State) in the third round would be ideal to groom under McCoy in case his development does not positively continue given his new weapons and surrounding cast. At that point, you have an accurate passer and student of the game coming into the system without the handicaps that McCoy endured his first season as a starter due to lack of offensive personnel. The position needs to be upgraded, but that does not mean that McCoy could not bring about that upgrade with a better offensive line, an entire off-season/training camp, and at least one offensive playmaker. If Griffin falls to pick four, I believe the Browns could trade down to six and let the Redskins take Griffin. At pick six, hopefully the Browns could land a Justin Blackmon, a Trent Richardson (RB Alabama), or worst case, a Riley Reiff (OT Iowa). Then at pick 22, there will be an embarrassment of riches at offensive skill options, especially WR. Through the second and third rounds is where the greatest value for interior offensive line is found.

I do believe Robert Griffin III will be an outstanding NFL QB. I simply do not believe he will be an outstanding Cleveland Brown QB given the current state of the organization.

[Alex Dunlap is the host of RosterWatch on 104.9FM ESPN Radio Austin, founder of Rosterwatch.com, and a featured expert contributor to the FantasyPros.com network. He is also an NFL draft analyst for PlayTheDraft.com.]


"Going from 4-12 to 6-10 isn't good enough. I believe we are going to be better than that. We're going to be a lot better than that." - Mike Holmgren (3/15/12)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 59
L
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 59
Quote:

I don't under stand all the hub bub about his height ... The kids at least a smig taller then any QB on our current roster.

I think it's a moot point. Maybe not to every team, but there certainly isn't that bias here in Cleveland.




Well - we didn't draft Colt McCoy at #4 -- that's a big part of the difference.


~Lyuokdea
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
That article is an excellent read, thank you for posting it.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
The writer writes well, but in my opinion, he really doesn't say much. Out of all of that, I saw "RGIII doesn't show anticipation-based throws on tape, and Colt McCoy hasn't been given enough time to develop. Colt McCoy has accuracy that makes up for his lack of arm strength (oh really?) I think RGIII will be a very good QB in the NFL, but I don't think the Browns should draft him."

You have to take anything remotely UT-related with a grain of salt coming from anyone from Austin. The same guy will probably tell you Vince Young just never got a real shot.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

You have to take anything remotely UT-related with a grain of salt coming from anyone from Austin. The same guy will probably tell you Vince Young just never got a real shot.




i'm not as "down" on Colt as most. but, this and this again. Colt is actually as reverred as VY down here for the 4 seasons he put together. I'd chalk that article up to "playing to his audience"


#gmstrong
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 87
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 87
Quote:


If Griffin falls to pick four, I believe the Browns could trade down to six and let the Redskins take Griffin. At pick six, hopefully the Browns could land a Justin Blackmon, a Trent Richardson (RB Alabama), or worst case, a Riley Reiff (OT Iowa).




Hmmm where have I heard this before ... Plagiarism


[Linked Image]

Page 8 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2013 NFL Season NFL Draft (2013) Mayock Says Go Get RGIII...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5