Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#67917 03/14/07 04:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
N
Rookie
OP Offline
Rookie
N
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21


[Linked Image from i92.photobucket.com]
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
N
Rookie
OP Offline
Rookie
N
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
I said I would have the link and even said please do not delete. I'm not the kind of person to make up rumors.


[Linked Image from i92.photobucket.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Wow, not really surprising I guess. Never understood why he never did much here.
He was one of the best in the business when he got here.


Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,427
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,427
Hurts to lose a guy like that, he always had so much energy and pop to him. The one thing I remember is that he always wanted to hit guys. But know it is Vicker's turn to step up into the spotlight and take the load, so I think he's ready to do his job. But it's sad to see Smith go.

Good luck Terelle, hope you shine wher ever you go man.


Find what you love and let it kill you.

-Charles Bukowski
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 890
W
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 890
I did my roster earlier this year for 2007 and I had Vickers starting at FB... This isn't a surprise for me, the coaches supposibly love Vickers (hopefully not as much as Carthon)


[Linked Image from i4.photobucket.com]

PRO-BOWLER!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
I like Smith but I can't say I disagree with the move. Somebody said in another thread about letting Russell go to free up a roster spot... well if we need roster spots, why in the world are we carrying TWO fullbacks who seldom touch the ball... and we have a bigger power back... didn't make sense to me.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307
Well, lets see what Vickers has, not much of a choice.. He didn't do bad anyways, atleast something to build from..


P.S. Looks alittle like Ice Cube in that pic.,lol, YEEHHHYEAAAAAA


[Linked Image from i37.photobucket.com]
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832
M
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832
I will repeat it here...

T. Smith is a great lead blocker. But, that is it. He is one-dimensional. The regime wants versatile players.

I called it 6 months ago. Vickers was drafted for a reason. The Browns didn't draft Vickers for depth at the FB position. He was drafted to be 'the guy'.

Vickers can block, carry and... throw the ball.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,525
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,525
Quote:

I said I would have the link and even said please do not delete. I'm not the kind of person to make up rumors.





Do NOT start a thread without a link. No rumors, period. This is the second time you have started a rumor thread today. Don't do it again.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
HE was one diminsional..strickly a blocker and even when we needed that he was used much..of course one of our other RB's never learned to run behind a FB..cough..thats Green , where ever he is..
This will mean the use of Vickers as BALL CARRIER and a blocker/pass catcher..

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
N
Rookie
OP Offline
Rookie
N
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
Sorry I didn't have the link right then I was posting it with the info in hand but because of the" RULES" I had to wait until it became public.

Last edited by NCBigDawg; 03/14/07 04:51 PM.

[Linked Image from i92.photobucket.com]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,525
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,525
Quote:

Sorry I didn't have the link right then I was posting it with the info in hand but because of the RULES I had to wait until it became public.






You did post it before you had a link. In the future, do not start a thread without the link. If you have any further questions, please PM me.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,333
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,333
Damn i remember his quote frm couple from couple of years back...

"I just want to hit people" or somethin like that.... does anyone have it? good stuff.....thanks for the awesome memories T SMITH.... the hit he put on Ray Lewis...good stuff among many other good blocks...


[Linked Image from fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net]
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
N
Rookie
OP Offline
Rookie
N
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
link to the story on official website.
http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/article.php?id=6572

Last edited by NCBigDawg; 03/14/07 05:10 PM.

[Linked Image from i92.photobucket.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

Wow, not really surprising I guess.





Smith is a one dimensional blocker who doesn't have a place on a team that needs to be multi-dimensional. I'm glad he's gone, as he wasn't the force this past season that he was advertised to be in the past. In his defense, he often had to choose between multiple guys to block because the line couldn't figure it out, but he can't catch, can't run, and really wasn't that effective out in space.

He's a good guy for an offense that only needs a fullback to run-block. That isn't us, and I'm thankful for that. Now the interesting question is this: Are we really going to reflect the Chargers offense? We just cut a fullback that's essentially the same as Lorenzo Neal............


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
V
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
V
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
Good. I'm glad he is moving on.

I liked the way the guy talked. I liked him his first year here. After that, I don't think he was what he was advertised. I don't think he is nearly as good as a lead blocker as Neal. Not even close. In fact, the last two years, I think his blocking was substandard.

As noted, he was one-dimensional and he hurt the offense more than he helped it. I am looking forward to seeing Vickers play the position. And as much as I bad-mouthed RD, I think he could have played there some and also some at RB. I still disagree w/trading him for Tim Carter.


"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 66
L
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
L
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 66
Quote:

Quote:

Wow, not really surprising I guess.





Smith is a one dimensional blocker who doesn't have a place on a team that needs to be multi-dimensional. I'm glad he's gone, as he wasn't the force this past season that he was advertised to be in the past. In his defense, he often had to choose between multiple guys to block because the line couldn't figure it out, but he can't catch, can't run, and really wasn't that effective out in space.

He's a good guy for an offense that only needs a fullback to run-block. That isn't us, and I'm thankful for that. Now the interesting question is this: Are we really going to reflect the Chargers offense? We just cut a fullback that's essentially the same as Lorenzo Neal............






I still think we are going to be more like the Redskins offense(that made me throw up in my mouth). Maybe Chud can utilize Vickers like Chris Cooley is utilized.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Quote:

Quote:

Sorry I didn't have the link right then I was posting it with the info in hand but because of the RULES I had to wait until it became public.






You did post it before you had a link. In the future, do not start a thread without the link. If you have any further questions, please PM me.




If I read the rules correctly, the rule is to: "cite a source" not post a link. There is a difference.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 95
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 95
NRTU

I hope Vickers can step up his blocking. In his limited play last year, I did not see anything outstanding from him (blocking, that is).

Also... Living in Crackmore, I've seen a lot of Jamal. He is a much more effective runner with a fullback in front of him. It gives him time to square his shoulders and go. Without one, he tends to stutter-step and never get squared to the line.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 145
A
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
A
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 145
This is a bit of a downer as I thought he was one of the best FB in league. Never thought we used him correcttly though esp under Davis. I always thought the Browns lacked a big back that on the goalline could punch it in and when we signed him I thought he was going to fill that role.


"I only had a couple of weeks to train, but I'm glad it happened because it gave me a chance to be a Browns player," Bell said.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
well Toad, you are glad he;s gone,, so is Vers,, I agree, if they weren't going to use him to do what he's good at , then yeah, he's just a roster spot being wasted..

But I don't 'think there is anything particularly wrong with Smith,, just a bad fit going forward..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
I don't think he blocked as well as advertized. The writing was on the wall last year.


[Linked Image from s2.excoboard.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,550
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,550
The most overhyped bum that has dawned a uniform in recent memory. I swear he had one decent game against the Ravens and that was it. I am glad he is off of the Browns welfare system.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
There isn't anything "wrong" with Smith. In an offense where his one single job is to pop his assignment and open a crack for his running back, he's as good as there is in the league. Problem is, outside of that, he has no uses.

He did well for Droughns when the line was decent, but when the blockers create more than one guy for him to hit and the offense calls for him to catch passes, he's a dud.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
It is about time. The guy was a waste of money and a roster spot.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
this is directed at U and Vers .... on the surface i could really care less about the move .. but what bothers me is were now sending out mixed messages .. AGAIN ... we sign Lewis who NEEDS a FB .. then we cut his FB .. *LOL* .. i gotta *L or i'd cry ... it makes no sense ...

I like vickers but he is not now nor will ever be near the blocker that Smith is .. not even close .. so why bring in Lewis if u know were gonna cut his FB ..

i guess this just reinforces that Lewis is one and done ... thats all i can garner with this move ... but i'm not sure why u wouldn't keep Smith around for another year just to help Lewis out ...

*shrugs shoulders* ...




Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
he was a square peg in a round hole here ... just like Garcia ...i just thought the signing of Lewis meant we'd move more toward being a square peg this year ... since he NEEDS A FB ...




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

he was a square peg in a round hole here ... just like Garcia ...i just thought the signing of Lewis meant we'd move more toward being a square peg this year ... since he NEEDS A FB ...




Why does he need a fb? Besides, T. Smith plugged more holes than D-linemen did. He was horrible.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 385
N
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 385
I'm a bit sad that Smith got released due to the fact that he's a hard-working, blue-collar guy who loved to play smash mouth football. We need more of that toughness on our team.

That being said, there's no need to carry two fullbacks on the roster. We can use that spot on another LB. Good luck finding a better fit Terrelle.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
*L* ... actually smith hit more of our OLmans backs than he did DLman or LBers but that wasnt his fault ..

Lewis LOVES his FB and prefers to run behind them ... its no coincidence that the Rats got rid of Obaydeju (their blocking FB) like 5 mins after Lewis signed with us .. *L* ..

watch how their O changes with McGahee .. ALOT MORE one back sets ...




Merth #67947 03/14/07 06:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,364
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,364
If Vickers can't do it......maybe we should draft Brian Leonard, Rutgers FB.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

*L* ... actually smith hit more of our OLmans backs than he did DLman or LBers but that wasnt his fault ..

Lewis LOVES his FB and prefers to run behind them ... its no coincidence that the Rats got rid of Obaydeju (their blocking FB) like 5 mins after Lewis signed with us .. *L* ..

watch how their O changes with McGahee .. ALOT MORE one back sets ...




To be honest, I think with Vickers back there, we have a running threat with both backs. Vickers I think also moves a lot better than Smith. However I do agree that Smith was also running into O-linemen. I still like Vickers upside though.

And for McGahee is going to be a huge bust behind that line.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

And as much as I bad-mouthed RD, I think he could have played there some and also some at RB. I still disagree w/trading him for Tim Carter.





I kinda think RD's ticket out of here was his recent off-field issues and the fumbles. But sharing the carries he and Lewis would compete with each other on every carry. That could've gotten interesting.


As for Smith, I really like the guy. But as a player he didn't seem as daunting nor intimidating as he did early on. Being a throw-back type FB his skill set just didn't match what our offense, (whatever it is ), needs out of the position.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Good guy had some tough times while he was here. Lost his dad.

Vickers was said to be getting better and better with his blocking...the kid hits hard and fast which might be a key. Also Vickers is a good weapon himself with screens and swing passes.

And we all know he can throw a Halfback pass

Writing was definately on the wall.

Diam....also expect a lot of 2 TE sets as well...don't forget Dinkins is one heck of a blocker

Another Terrell bites the does *L*


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

we sign Lewis who NEEDS a FB .. then we cut his FB .. *LOL* .



Losing some blocking ability but gaining versatility from the position is how I view cutting Smith for Vickers. As you noted, since Lewis is a one-and-done kinda guy (more or less) I don't know that keeping Smith really did that much for us, since I think we're gaining in the versatility department.

Here's my problem with Smith (it's always been my problem): With him in the game, that's one less threat that a defense has to consider. I agree that it probably doesn't help Lewis, but if Lewis still has anything left, this downgrade in the run-blocking department shouldn't matter. Besides, do we really think Lewis is gonna get 300 carries this year? I sure don't.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Quote:

If Vickers can't do it......maybe we should draft Brian Leonard, Rutgers FB.




...and we reportedly LOVE this guy.....he is a RB/FB tweener, but I see him as a RB....we can´t "afford" him but if we somehow get another 2nd rounder I´d like to pick him up

Oh, and good luck Terrelle

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
V
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
V
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
I agree that Lewis does seem to be the type of back who needs to run behind a FB. I just thought Smith wasn't very effective the last two years. I know Vickers is smaller, but Richie Anderson was a very good FB in front of Martin for years, and he is even smaller.

Who knows?


"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,393
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,393
I think Reuben was out for a couple reasons:

1. Phil thought JL was better
2. Reuben whined about his contract when he got here.
3. Reuben's numbers were bad after his new contract.
4. Off the field issues.


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,550
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,550
Here's my problem with Smith (it's always been my problem): With him in the game, that's one less threat that a defense has to consider

Heres my problem with Smith short yardage and goaline i swear the dude never freaking hit anyone 80% of the time. He is the only player on this team that ever went into the endzone untouched and thats not a good thing for a lead blocker lol It wasnt his one dimension being an issue he had no dimension.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Quote:

we sign Lewis who NEEDS a FB .. then we cut his FB ..




forgive me, but I don't remember, who was his full back in Baltimore that opened up so many holes for Lewis? I'm just trying to remember and frankly, the name isn't coming to me.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Page 1 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum t. smith released.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5