Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#714822 08/19/12 11:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
There's been a couple of threads around this issue...but we havent had one in here.

What do you think our final 53 will be? and why? and who are gonna be some of the "tough" cuts?

QB: Weeden, McCoy, Lewis (as good as Wallace is, he carries the highest price tag)
RB: TRich, Hardesty, BJax (it's tough for Ogbonnaya because he has such competition and the guy is a pretty decent running back that with some time on the field could really develop...it's too bad we couldnt move him, Adonis Thomas hopefully we can stash on the PS)
FB: Smelley, Marecic (I think its Marecic that will be why we dont keep a guy like OGB)
TE: Watson, Smith, Cameron, Gronkowski (My first surprise cut is Moore. You cant make the team from the tub and he just hasnt been healthy enough and i think Gronkowski will be a good player to have and he's flashed so far in the preseason and i think he will more in the next 2 games)
WR: Gordon, Little, Benjamin, Norwood, Cribbs, Rod Windsor (or Owen Spencer)...Another surprise cut, MoMass...you cant make the club from the tub like Moore, and we just cant rely on him in my opinion, and I think its time to move on from him, also hopefully we can stash Cooper on the PS, but with Benjamin, Little, and Norwood all capable of being a slot guy, theres no room for him
OL: Thomas, Pinkston, Mack, Lauvao, Schwartz, Miller, John Greco, Stanley Daniels (buh bye Oniel)
DL: Rucker, *Taylor*, Hughes, Rubin, Sheard, Winn, Parker, Stephens, Benard...Cameron to the PS...Tough cuts to be made here. Auston English hopefully can go back to the PS, but he is a guy that I like and rarely see mistakes from when hes out there. He's usually named for positive in preseason games. Paxson and Schaefering are tough cuts as well
LB: JMJ, DQ, Maiava, *Fujita*, Fort, Robertson, Acho (Ben Jacobs to the PS)
CB: Haden, Brown, Patterson, Skrine, Wade, Dockery
S: Ward, Hagg, Young, Sims
Special Teams: Dawson, Yount, Hodges


Lots of tough cuts here.

there is some very tough competition on the DL, and i think we have a lot of young guys that are earning spots. Guys like Robertson and Fort and Gronkowski...We have some good youth, and it will give us good depth, and active depth.

I think we'll actually be cutting guys that have talent enough to play on other teams.

Whatre your thoughts, who is your 53, what would change from mine. The two most obvious changes i think would be keeping moore and momass, i just dont think that we should...I think we have healthier, more potentially valuable guys on the roster.


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 605
R
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 605
Quote:

Cameron to the PS




I don't think that he last's ten seconds on our practice squad, and he already flashed in the GreenBay game with pressure, something this team sorely lacks. He makes the final 53, end of story. IMO

I think one of the over achiever LB's makes it possibley ove Acho and he goes to practice squad. Acho seams to be invisible so far.

Love the Sims keep, he is making it hard to not keep him. can he play both corner and safety?


"He who buys what he does not need steals from himself."
RocDawg #714824 08/19/12 12:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Quote:

Quote:

Cameron to the PS




I don't think that he last's ten seconds on our practice squad, and he already flashed in the GreenBay game with pressure, something this team sorely lacks. He makes the final 53, end of story. IMO

I think one of the over achiever LB's makes it possibley ove Acho and he goes to practice squad. Acho seams to be invisible so far.

Love the Sims keep, he is making it hard to not keep him. can he play both corner and safety?




Acho is kind of a head scratcher to me. I really thought he'd make some noise,, so far, he's as quiet as a church mouse. is he injured or something?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
RocDawg #714825 08/19/12 12:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
Thats true...

I went through the whole roster, and when I finished, i had 54. I wouldnt know who to cut and where to find that room for him. He was my last cut...

I wouldnt know where to go. I think we have a ton of good players on the DL...well rather enough roster-worthy players on our DL. I could get completely behind Cameron making the roster and think he should...who would we cut then? he is a DT...Winn, Rubin, Hughes have to stay. Is Cameron our fourth?


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
I too wonder about Acho. I think he would be more destined to the PS then the final 53. I think MoMass makes the final 53 and if cut would def be a shocker.
I like English as well but I dont see him on the final 53.
The 3rd QB is still a toss up but I would imagine barring trade Wallace is in over Lewis. I dont think Smelly would make the PS and we probably will have to carry him on the 53 but that may be just me looking at the team through my Browns glasses.
Shaf would be a very tough call to me he makes the team but as you noted we have some good young talent there.
I hope Wade makes the team along with Sims but one never knows.


If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Quote:

Thats true...

I went through the whole roster, and when I finished, i had 54. I wouldnt know who to cut and where to find that room for him. He was my last cut...

I wouldnt know where to go. I think we have a ton of good players on the DL...well rather enough roster-worthy players on our DL. I could get completely behind Cameron making the roster and think he should...who would we cut then? he is a DT...Winn, Rubin, Hughes have to stay. Is Cameron our fourth?




Im not sure but dont they get 1 extra roster spot for the 3rd Qb? He cant play unless the other 2 are injured and then if he does play he has to finish the game? So that may be the roster spot you are looking for or Im just confused on how that works.


If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
3rd QB counts to the 53, but not the game day active 45.


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
Taylor will start the year on the PUP list and Fujita will be a roster exemption...that should free up two spots for now?

I think Moore stays over Smith at TE...

I don't see how Benard makes the team...he's too small and not special-enough as a pass rusher...we have better choices...

I don't think Mo Mass gets cut...but won't be surprised if he does...

I think I'd eat my hat if Windsor or Spencer make the team...

It's getting hard to see Cribbs on the 53...

With the Cameron pickup, I could see Winn getting some serious looks at DE

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Benard is 6'2" and 256#. Sheard is 6'2" and 255#. Parker is 6'2" and 250#. Stephens is 6'3" and 255#. English is 6'3" and 250#. I'm not certain why anyone would think that he's too small. In fact, last year when he put on weight/size, the team was mad because he was too big at 270-275. Last year was not the year to judge him by, as he had changed his whole body to what he thought the team would want from him as a DE. He has a great burst as a pass rusher. I think that he could very well push one of our free agent signees, Parker, off the team.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
yea I had the *s near them because they wont be a part of the roster when the season starts.

I think that Benard could end up a casualty especially with Rucker and Sheard as starters, and Parker and Stephens as backups...

Then Winn, Hughes, Rubin and either Schaefering or Cameron as DTs...that gives us 2 starters and 2 backups...if Marecic gets cut. it could open room for both of them, but having Smelley as the only FB when he is more of a FB/H-Back/TE hybrid just wont work.


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
Juqua Parker can get the QB though...he's had single seasons with more sacks than Benard has in his entire career.


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Parker is also 34 years old.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Benard hasn't played bad but he hasnt really stood out either although after a year on IR, that is to be expected. He needs a strong showing in these next two games.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Quote:

3rd QB counts to the 53, but not the game day active 45.




Thanks I knew there was something I was forgetting.


If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Quote:

Benard hasn't played bad but he hasnt really stood out either although after a year on IR, that is to be expected. He needs a strong showing in these next two games.




Odd but we carried him through last season so if we cut this year I guess we could say that would be a FO mistake. Cutting your losses isnt a bad thing but it would kinda strike me as strange.
Personally I think he makes the final cut.


If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
I'm trying to watch for both Parker and Benard in this game, and how each did.



With 4:37 left in the 1st quarter, we have a Benard signting at RDE. He makes the play on the RB, tripping him up even though he looked like he might have been taken out of the play at first.

The next play had both Parker at LDE, and Benard at RDE. Both players were effectively blocked on the pass rush.

Next play again had Benard at RDE and Parker at LDE. Parker jumped off sides. Rodgers ran past Parker's side, since Parker ran himself well beyond the QB. Penalty was declined, as Rodgers had a huge run.

Next play, same alignment. Benard and Maiava combine on the tackle of the RB.

Next play, same alignment. Bit of a stunt. The Packers pocket holds up.

Next play, same alignment. Benard comes around the tackle, and forces Rodgers back up the middle where he runs, but cannot get the first down.

Next play, 4th and 2. Parker at LDE, Stephens at RDE. Parker pretty well negated. We blitzed and did pressure Rodgers some, but he still got the pass away, and Wade broke it up.

I'm going to stop there, because Parker had no stats in the game, and from what I saw, little positive impact for the Browns. Benard was much, much more disruptive.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Quote:

Juqua Parker can get the QB though...he's had single seasons with more sacks than Benard has in his entire career.




OK, I can't let this slide. It's just not true.

Parker's high was 8 sacks in 2009. He has 36.5 sacks in 11 seasons.

Benard had 7.5 sacks in 2010. He has a total of 11.5 sacks in 3 seasons.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Quote:

I'm trying to watch for both Parker and Benard in this game, and how each did.



With 4:37 left in the 1st quarter, we have a Benard signting at RDE. He makes the play on the RB, tripping him up even though he looked like he might have been taken out of the play at first.

The next play had both Parker at LDE, and Benard at RDE. Both players were effectively blocked on the pass rush.

Next play again had Benard at RDE and Parker at LDE. Parker jumped off sides. Rodgers ran past Parker's side, since Parker ran himself well beyond the QB. Penalty was declined, as Rodgers had a huge run.

Next play, same alignment. Benard and Maiava combine on the tackle of the RB.

Next play, same alignment. Bit of a stunt. The Packers pocket holds up.

Next play, same alignment. Benard comes around the tackle, and forces Rodgers back up the middle where he runs, but cannot get the first down.

Next play, 4th and 2. Parker at LDE, Stephens at RDE. Parker pretty well negated. We blitzed and did pressure Rodgers some, but he still got the pass away, and Wade broke it up.

I'm going to stop there, because Parker had no stats in the game, and from what I saw, little positive impact for the Browns. Benard was much, much more disruptive.




Thanks YTB for the grading. I didnt watch Parker TBH but it does support my feelings B makes the team.


If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Ventrone will make the final 53 because of his play on special teams.


#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
I stand corrected.

I thought he had a 12 sack season. I mustve been mistaken, and thinking of someone else


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
was thinkin I guess of either Babin or Trent Cole. Thought Parker had a 12 sack season.

If that is the case then, it wouldnt be out of the question for him to be cut over Benard, but Parker was in Philly with Shurmur and our whole staff and Benard was not.


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Pdawg #714843 08/19/12 05:10 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Quote:

Ventrone will make the final 53 because of his play on special teams.



Interesting while he did look good last game to an extent Im not sure his pos on the team is solid yet.


If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
Who goes if Ventrone stays?


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
QB: (3)
Brandon Weeden
Colt McCoy
Thaddeus Lewis

RB: (3)
Trent Richardson
Montario Hardesty
Brandon Jackson

FB: (2)
Owen Marecic
Brad Smelley

TE: (3)
Ben Watson
Jordan Cameron
Alex Smith \ Alex Moore

WR: (6)
Greg Little
Josh Gordon
Mohamed Massaquoi
Travis Benjamin
Jordan Norwood
Joshua Cribbs (RS)

OL: (9)
Joe Thomas
Jason Pinkston
Alex Mack
Shawn Lauvao
Mitchell Schwartz
John Greco
Ryan Miller
Jarrod Shaw
Oniel Cousins

LS: Christian Yount
PK: Phil Dawson

^ (28)

DL: (8)
Jabaal Sheard
Ahtyba Ruben
Frostee Rucker
John Hughes
Billy Winn
Juqua Parker
Emmanuel Stephens
Marcus Benard \ Ronnie Cameron


LB: (7)
James-Michael Johnson
D'Qwell Jackson
Kaluka Maiava
Scott Fujita
L.J Fort
Craig Robinson
Benjamin Jacobs

DB : (9)
Joe Haden
TJ. Ward
Eric Hagg
Sheldon Brown
Dimitri Patterson
Buster Skrine
Trevin Wade
Usama Young \ David Simms
Ray Ventrone

P: Reggie Hodges

(PUP): Phil Taylor


\ = undecided


[Linked Image]

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
I can go at this two ways, what do I think the actual front office will do, or what would I do if I were in their position.

I am going to go at it with the second option in mind, mainly because it is impossible to predict what anyone will do without the knowledge of what they have done in private practice sessions and in the film room. Also, the other teams in the NFL will be making cuts and I'm sure we will be looking at many of those players for our practice squad.

QB: The obvious one is Weeden (1). I would take McCoy (2) over Wallace because of his youth, positive attitude, and price. Lewis (3) would be the third QB, but I would keep an eye on the waiver wire for a young guy with more potential that could be developed. I would hope we could get a late round pick for Wallace from a team like the Eagles or Packers.

RB: Knowing this teams' luck Richardson (4) will be on IR before the season starts. Hardesty (5) worries me as the primary backup because of his injury history. That's where Brandon Jackson (6) comes in. He can't carry the load, but he can take 5-10 carries a game. Ogbonnaya (7) proved last year that he could at least play average in the NFL and I think we need the fourth back on the team because of Richardson's situation and Hardesty's injury history. Once Richardson has proved he is fully healthy I expect Ogbonnaya to be cut. I also expect that we carry an extra back (like Adonis Thomas) on the practice squad.

FB: Marecic (8) can play special teams and can block, the two most important things you need out of your fullback. We have also been told that he has good hands. I think/hope he stays. I hope Smelley (9) also makes the team. Players who can play multiple positions are valuable. He is also younger and cheaper than some other options (see below). In a perfect world I would stash him on the practice squad, but I feel many other teams would line up for a chance to get him on their squad.

TE: Watson (10) and Cameron (11) are locks. I would have to say Alex Smith is cut due to Smelley's presence on the team. Evan Moore (12) is iffy for me because he can't block or stay healthy. But when on the field, he is a threat. While Gronkowski has impressed, he would be cut.

OL: Thomas (13), Pinkston (14), Mack (15), Lauvao (16), Schwartz (17), and Miller (18) are all locks for me. I would cut Oniel Cousins. Right now. He was terrible last year and has been terrible in the preseason. And he got called for multiple dumb penalties. And he has missed practice due to injury. If he is not cut I would be very surprised. I would say that Greco (19) is safe because of his versatility and experience with this coaching staff. I don't know much about the other linemen, so I will just say we will probably carry two more (20, 21).

DL: Taylor (22), Sheard (23), Rubin (24), Rucker (25), Paxson (26), Winn (27), and Hughes (28) are all locks. I would say Bernard (29) and Parker (30) will both make the team because of their perceived pass rushing ability. I would like to see Schaefering make the team because he seems like he works hard, but I don't think he has enough talent to hang. Emmanuel Stephens (31) seems like he has more upside.

LB: Jackson (32), Fujita (33), Maiava (34), JMJ (35) are all locks. It seems like the coaching staff has confidence in L.J. Fort (36). If he can be our new Blake Costanzo that would be great. I haven't really heard or seen much about Acho (37) but when in doubt go with the draft pick over the undrafted guy. Benjamin Jacobs (38) also flashed on the screen when I watched games.

I just realized I skipped the wide receivers and I don't want to go back and change all my handy numbers...

WR: Little (39), Gordon (40), and Benjamin (41) are the only three I see as locks. Massaquoi (42) has the concussion concern, but I think he is the most talented of the guys left. I hope Cribbs (43) is on the team, but I really wish he would stick to special teams. I would love to see Norwood (44) make the team as the slot guy. That means goodbye for everyone's favorite guy, Carlton Mitchell. We would probably take one of Bert Reed or Josh Cooper on the practice squad.

DB: Ward (45), Haden (46), Brown (47), Patterson (48), Skrine (49), and Hagg (50). That's only six DB's. Which means I would have to go back and cut back at a different position. In today's game it's necessary to have many DB's because of the crazy amount of passing in the league. I would go back and cut Jacobs and Stephens and replace them with Wade (31) and Ventrone (38).

ST: Dawson (51), Yount (52), Hodges (53)

cfrs15 #714847 08/20/12 05:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
QB: Rodgers, Brady, Weeden
RB: Foster, McCoy, Richardson
WR: Johnson, Johnson, Fitzgerald, Jones, Little, Benjamin
TE: Gronkowski, Graham, Cameron
OLine: Thomas, Nicks, Mack, Grubbs, Scwartz, Long, Mangold, Pinkston

DE: Williams, Freeny, Allen, Sheard
DT: Suh, Taylor, Rubin, Hughes, Winn
LB: Willis, Ware, Jackson, Miller, Dumerville, Johnson
CB: Haden, Bailey, Peterson, Rodgers-Cromartie, Cromartie, Revis
S: Berry, Ward, Reed, Polamalu

K: Dawson
P: Hodges
LS: Yount

Oh, I made some trades...


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
ThatGuy #714848 08/20/12 05:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Quote:

QB: Rodgers, Brady, Weeden
RB: Foster, McCoy, Richardson
WR: Johnson, Johnson, Fitzgerald, Jones, Little, Benjamin
TE: Gronkowski, Graham, Cameron
OLine: Thomas, Nicks, Mack, Grubbs, Scwartz, Long, Mangold, Pinkston

DE: Williams, Freeny, Allen, Sheard
DT: Suh, Taylor, Rubin, Hughes, Winn
LB: Willis, Ware, Jackson, Miller, Dumerville, Johnson
CB: Haden, Bailey, Peterson, Rodgers-Cromartie, Cromartie, Revis
S: Berry, Ward, Reed, Polamalu

K: Dawson
P: Hodges
LS: Yount

Oh, I made some trades...




Im not sure if Revis makes the team lol good post I liked it


If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
Quote:

Benard is 6'2" and 256#. Sheard is 6'2" and 255#. Parker is 6'2" and 250#. Stephens is 6'3" and 255#. English is 6'3" and 250#. I'm not certain why anyone would think that he's too small. In fact, last year when he put on weight/size, the team was mad because he was too big at 270-275. Last year was not the year to judge him by, as he had changed his whole body to what he thought the team would want from him as a DE. He has a great burst as a pass rusher. I think that he could very well push one of our free agent signees, Parker, off the team.




YTown,

Thanks for listing the stats. Unfortunately, it only bolsters my point.

Benard plays "small" even though his measurables are similar to others. That's why someone may conclude that he is too small.

He himself decided he should bulk up to play DE...because he himself knew he was too small...or played too small.

He is not a run-stuffer. He flashed for a very short time as a pass rusher a very long time ago.

Do we keep a guy like that? Or carry another WR to keep Cribbs? Or leave a spot for Ventrone? Or carry an extra DT where we have accumulated some talent?

Benard is at the bottom of the 53...he is not a special teams animal...he's quite ordinary as a non-special, situational pass rusher.

In the numbers game, he could easily be the odd man out.

cfrs15 #714850 08/20/12 09:29 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:


I also expect that we carry an extra back (like Adonis Thomas) on the practice squad.




There is something about that youngster I like ... I hope we can keep him in the fold on our PS.

Quote:


We would probably take one of Bert Reed or Josh Cooper on the practice squad.




Maybe both (I have both listed as + prospects) + = PS.

Both have shown an ability to get open and catch the ball.

I think Jarrad Shaw has looked pretty good and we used him at Center in last weeks contest vs GB, late in the game, so I think he can offer some versatility as a backup OG/OC.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
I watched the first half again last night and thought Benard did a very good job in playing the run. The pass rush is there but the run stuffing has been nonexistent. If he can become consistent against the run, he will jump Rucker who can't stay healthy.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Quote:

I watched the first half again last night and thought Benard did a very good job in playing the run. The pass rush is there but the run stuffing has been nonexistent. If he can become consistent against the run, he will jump Rucker who can't stay healthy.




I agree and on the other hand Parker has really shown very little in limited PT.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Benard was hurt last year, after he came into camp at 275 or so. He only played 4 games last year.

The year before, he had 7.5 sacks. He also had 28 tackles. That was while being used mainly as a pass rushing specialist. The year before that, he had 3.5 sacks and 14 tackles in only 6 games.

I watched the Green Bay game and concentrated on Benard and Parker, and Benard was much, much faster. He had much better burst off the line. He also wrapped up on tackles, even when he had to come back and make the tackle. I didn't see a guy "playing small" in any way. Can you explain what you mean, with, perhaps, an example? What I did see was a guy who played fast. On one play he was in the backfield, and tackled the runner, even when it looked like he was out of the play. I noted the play in my breakdown earlier if you want to review the game and see what I saw.

Parker was out of the picture on almost every play. I don't think that he has been impressive in any way thus far. We have 2 more games for the Browns to evaluate them, but if they are even, I think the tie goes to the younger player. 34 year old DEs worry the crap out of me.

I believe I saw someone bring up Schaefering, and as far as he is concerned ......... he's OK. He's not a pass rusher at all though. He has 2 sacks in 4 seasons. (37 games) He's a decent backup, but he's really nothing special. He really doesn't have a great impact on the opposing running game. He has below average burst, decent strength, and limited agility. He played more in the final 6 games of the season, and had 14 of his 29 tackles in those 6 games. we gave up 134 yards, 290, 147, 74, 162, and 221 yards. Ouch. In our best game during that stretch, against Arizona, he had no tackles.

I think that he is a serviceable player, but nothing really special. What do you see that causes you to have a different opinion about him?


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
D
DG Offline
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
I think Marecic was a bad draft pick and has done nothing so I would keep Ogbonnaya since he has really helped us. I would also keep Moore since he has helped us and Cameron hasn't. Massiquoi has helped us but has been injury prone...Mitchell has looked good in preseason and Little hasn't...Little has been a very good player until the game starts and then he drops passes. Schaefering has helped us and I would not like to see him go.

Last edited by DG; 08/20/12 08:48 PM.
DG #714855 08/20/12 09:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Quote:






Move along, nothing to see here.


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 745
K
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
K
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 745
Parker is 34 years old. I questioned this Heckert signing from the get go.
He did almost nothing in Philly last year.
how many 34 yr old DE's play at a high level? very very few. Parker has been average all his career. A body.
there were better options at RDE,but typical Heckert goes shopping in the discontinued bargain bin at a position where you need to have a force to neutralize a QB.
I would be surprised if the Browns would scour the waiver wire for another RDE thats a upgrade over Parker.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
He. Was. Depth.


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
ThatGuy #714859 08/20/12 10:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Quote:

Quote:






Move along, nothing to see here.




This was funny thanks because I was thinking it as I read it!


If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
Quote:

I think that he is a serviceable player, but nothing really special. What do you see that causes you to have a different opinion about him?




You already answered that question in the first sentence above. I see the same player you do in that regard.

My point is that I would keep an extra DT or LB - that I really liked - over Benard and I think we have better choices at DE.

Parker has proven that he can rush the passer as a DE in the league. Rucker has proven that he is special against the run. Stephens has shown me some very good push. Sheard is a stud. That's (4) DEs. I'd like to see Winn rush from the DE spot.

I keep those DEs over Benard and I am not willing to carry another DE (assuming 4 is the right number) who doesn't do anything special.

Especially since I think we will carry (5) DTs - Rubin, Taylor, Hughes, Winn, & Cameron

That accounts for 9 DL...and leaves out Paxson & Schaefering. If I carry a 10th DL...it's one of those guys before Benard. (I could see Paxson going on IR and Schaefering on the team at least while Taylor is on PUP.)

I could imagine Benard beating out Parker and would love it if he did...but I won't be surprised either way.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
I think it will come down to keeping 5 DT (Not counting Taylor) or 5 DE's for a total of 9 DL.

I just hope that if we keep Parker (over Benard) it's because the Coaches see something we haven't seen from him. He has not impressed me one iota. What he has done in his career in the past really means nothing if he still can't do those things today.


[Linked Image]

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum our final 53...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5