Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Quote:


Since we're not looking like a playoff team, I'm curious why you feel that bringing in Green would then not be a good choice, but would rather go with Carr?

Neither guy is going to cost a 1st day selection.




Well...so much for that theory.....

The Chiefs are reportedly close to agreeing on a trade that will send Trent Green to Miami, with only a restructured contract standing in the way.
The Dolphins want Green to take a "major pay cut" and aren't willing to pay him much more than the veteran's minimum, according to the Palm Beach Post. Miami would reportedly send the second-round pick acquired for Wes Welker to Kansas City once a new contract is finalized.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/dolphins/co...=7&cxcat=46


It think the Texans got hosed on the Schaub deal cause I think he is overrated....you simply can´t tell either way....and for that 2 2nd rounders and a high 4th rounder (value of the 1st round swap) is simply too much

Oh well...I´m just happy we didn´t trade for him...

Overall I think it´s not good for our Thomas chances at 3 because now more QBs will be on the move and the Lions may find no takers and if the Raiders get Carr they might take Thomas too?...

Talking bout QBs on the move....what do you guys think about Culpepper? I´d give our 4th or 5th rounder for him


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,836
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,836
After some thought, it is entirely possible other GM's don't want to do buisness with Millen if they can help it....I get the feeling he isn't a part of the club and has a attitude the others don't cotton to.

I don't think they like or trust the guy and don't really want to do anything that helps him.

JMO.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,744
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,744
Culpepper is the luckiest QB ever. He got stuck with Randy Moss and Chris Carter.....He is horrible....He is washed up. I wouldn't even pick him up off waivers....


Go Browns!!

[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
A 2nd rounder for Green.............That's steep, but on a team looking to win the Super Bowl NOW, they'll have to go there unless they want to throw the dice on Culpepper.

If I was Trent Green, I'd tell the Fish to go PHish themselves.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,524
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,524
League minimum? If I was going to be the started I'd make sure I'd make sure I made more than that


<><

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Quote:

A 2nd rounder for Green.............That's steep, but on a team looking to win the Super Bowl NOW, they'll have to go there unless they want to throw the dice on Culpepper.

If I was Trent Green, I'd tell the Fish to go PHish themselves.





I think he´ll get a fat SBonus and everybody´s happy....a late 2nd rounder would be very expensive....oh and I don´t know about SB-run...new Coach, new QB and no LT (questionable overall OL) = forget it

I like Green but he is absolutely the second coming of Bledsoe with no LT....I´ve senn him in many games doing pretty good...and then I´ve seen him in some games without LT Roaf (not only this season...someone remember that MNG w/out Roaf?)....Green is very OL/LT dependent...that said the Fins have no LT and may have to reach a bit for Levi Brown and hope he has a decent rookie year....short term I see no other fix for them


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Imagine us. It'd cost us an early 2nd rounder to beat the Fish. IF that rumor is real, we're SOL (not that Savage appears the least bit interested anyway). Green isn't Bledsoe as he's got some mobility in the pocket, but yeah, his success is directly tied to the Oline. As noted, we've got an improved line. Tucker over Butler, Fraley's 2nd year in the system, McKinney over Coleman and Stein over Druzzi. That's significant.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
So do you think we are standing pat with Anderson and Frye ? Most of the Vets are gone. What the HECK is Phil's plan. Maybe we just go with Charlie and see how it plays out for another year... I don't have a real problem with that if we make enough improvements in other area's we should still be a lot better. (Ok, maybe just somewhat).

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
I thought a 2nd rounder was painfully high for Green. That appears to be correct:

Quote:

PFT
FINS STILL SNIFFING AROUND GREEN

Gred Bedard of he Palm Beach Post reports that the Dolphins and the Chiefs are still working toward a trade that would send quarterback Trent Green to Miami. The only sticking point? Green's pay in 2007.

He's due to receive $7.2 million, $7.7 million, and $9.2 million in base salaries over the next three seasons. The Fins want to pay him far less than that. Per Bedard, the two sides are "in the same ballpark."

Under the deal, the Fins would send to Kansas City the seventh-round pick that Miami received from the Patriots as part of the Wes Welker trade. [Editor's note: A prior version of this story incorrectly said that the Fins would send a second-round pick to the Chiefs. We regret the error.]

The acquisition of Green could mean the end of the road for quarterback Daunte Culpepper in Miami, who was acquired from Minnesota last year for the Dolphins' second-round pick in the 2006 draft.





C'mon Savage. You're not willing to give a 2nd day pick........perhaps only a 5th or 6th rounder.........to the Chiefs? For a QB who's better than anything we've had for more than a decade?

Use your head. Anderson isn't a viable option. You know it now. Frye is teetering on the edge of spending the rest of his career as "the gutsy backup" and you can't afford to BUST your #1 pick on a QB.

Think about it.............


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
Quote:

I thought a 2nd rounder was painfully high for Green. That appears to be correct:

Quote:

PFT
FINS STILL SNIFFING AROUND GREEN

Gred Bedard of he Palm Beach Post reports that the Dolphins and the Chiefs are still working toward a trade that would send quarterback Trent Green to Miami. The only sticking point? Green's pay in 2007.

He's due to receive $7.2 million, $7.7 million, and $9.2 million in base salaries over the next three seasons. The Fins want to pay him far less than that. Per Bedard, the two sides are "in the same ballpark."

Under the deal, the Fins would send to Kansas City the seventh-round pick that Miami received from the Patriots as part of the Wes Welker trade. [Editor's note: A prior version of this story incorrectly said that the Fins would send a second-round pick to the Chiefs. We regret the error.]

The acquisition of Green could mean the end of the road for quarterback Daunte Culpepper in Miami, who was acquired from Minnesota last year for the Dolphins' second-round pick in the 2006 draft.





C'mon Savage. You're not willing to give a 2nd day pick........perhaps only a 5th or 6th rounder.........to the Chiefs? For a QB who's better than anything we've had for more than a decade?

Use your head. Anderson isn't a viable option. You know it now. Frye is teetering on the edge of spending the rest of his career as "the gutsy backup" and you can't afford to BUST your #1 pick on a QB.

Think about it.............





Agreed.

But I'm leaning towards QB in the draft now if Thomas is off the board, and there's several reasons.

1) Anderson and Frye, don't like either of them. I think Anderson has more upside but I know you think differently.

2) If we're going nowhere this year (like Vers says), I'd rather go nowhere this year with a rookie and go somewhere next year with a 2nd year QB, over going nowhere this year AND going nowhere next year because we'll be waiting on a rookie to develop. (sounds confusing, but if you read it slowly it makes sense)

3) Drafting a QB instantly lowers whatever inflated expectations there are on this season. Perhaps it saves Romeo (and possibly Phil's) job(s)?

4) Runningbacks don't deserve $50 million contracts when the best runningbacks don't even get half that in FA.

5) WR's are the easiest position to take out of a game and are too dependent on the variables around them.

6) No one on defense is really deserving of #3 overall.

To me it leaves us two options: LT or QB.

Ammo #71882 03/22/07 12:53 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
Quote:

3) Drafting a QB instantly lowers whatever inflated expectations there are on this season. Perhaps it saves Romeo (and possibly Phil's) job(s)?






I said something like this before, and I think it would enable them to stay another year...I do like Frye, and Carr, and really anyone in the top 10 look good to me.


Go Browns !!!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
And what if we never get a QB? How long does RAC get? 10 years?

Doesn't work that way, hehe.

This is RAC's last shot. If he doesn't keep the team at least pushing .500 at midseason he's toast, and rightfully so.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
Quote:

And what if we never get a QB? How long does RAC get? 10 years?

Doesn't work that way, hehe.

This is RAC's last shot. If he doesn't keep the team at least pushing .500 at midseason he's toast, and rightfully so.





I would think RAC does only have this year to prove himself as a true head coach, and I would think the Browns will look for his replacement if he does not make an improvement. I had said (Ammo as well) that if they bring in a new QB rookie, and still are not able to win many games, BUT the new QB is able to prove he is the real deal Franchise QB just he looks like a rookie and makes rookie mistakes, the media and fan base might give RAC a pass this year. Giving Phil a chance to hold onto him without that much explanation needed, other then "The Kids a rookie, but boy did he come on strong at the end"

Yes this is unlikely and has a very small chance of working, and if some games look like last year as if they were lost out there, then Yes RAC will be gone. {Am I wrong, but most of games when we always looked lost out there was when MO was still around? jmho.}

So honestly Toad, what do you think of RAC's ability as head coach?
I still think he could be very good, just from the things he says about players and team work, but I know nothing about game planning. So I could be talking out my backside...


Go Browns !!!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Talking out your backside? We all do that to some extent far more often than we'd care to admit

My opinion of RAC is not favorable and I'd liked to have seen a replacement, but I've said enough about that over the past six months.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
Quote:

Talking out your backside? We all do that to some extent far more often than we'd care to admit


Are you talking about GM again Toad????


I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...

What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
PETE314 #71887 03/22/07 05:25 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,424
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,424
Thats why he said I had bad breath the last time he kissed me


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Pdawg #71888 03/22/07 05:44 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 344
W
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 344
Quote:

Now I don't have to worry about us giving up a high draft choice for him


Wow! I was thinking that this was the type of deal that we would have to make on draft day. Maybe Phil wants Carr more than Shaub and will wait for his release. This kills any deals with Houston for Brady or Peterson (they have no more picks lol); However, maybe we can get a Real Sweet Deal with Atlanta for Calvin Johnson to get ahead of Tampa Bay!!! JMHO Go Brownies!!!


Who Let Da Dawgs Out? Woof, Woof, Woof!!!!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,092
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,092
Peen and Ammo,,, Did either of you read my question or does your dislike for Charlies skills run so deep that your totally blinded..

I asked WHY it can't be that the FRONT OFFICE feels as if Charlie is the guy? You two and a few others may not believe in Charlie (I myself aren't 100% convinced either) but the front office must or I think we would have seen some kinda movement on trade for either Schaub or Carr or someone else.. (not that it means much at this point, because none of the choices out there are all that appealing)

Some say that the FO isn't talking about Charlie so it must mean they aren't happy with him.. I ask this, who the hell ARE they talking aboiut? NOBODY! They aren't saying anything about anyone.. That's not a valid argument.

It could be that the Browns have a thought of grabbing Russell or Quinn in the draft,, if so,, ok,, fine! BUT THAT'S NOT TODAY!

SO for today, Why can't the Browns FO be thinking that he's the GUY?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,165
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,165
Quote:

SO for today, Why can't the Browns FO be thinking that he's the GUY?




The obvious answer is that the FO "could" be thinking he's the guy, in fact they keep saying it over and over.

We'll find out on Draft Day just how much they mean it.

I think most the skeptics on Charlie have just noticed some significant gaps in his game. First and foremost IMO is his arm. He lacks the ability to put zip on his throws when on the move. In this league you have to be Very special to be a good QB without a strong arm. All the best QB's have it:

Manning
Brady
Cutler
Rivers
Romo
Manning
McNabb
Vick
Brees
Bulgur
Leftwich
McNair
Hasselbeck

Sure, Joe Montana didn't have a gun, but he was magic in every other way. Frye has yet to show the magic.

Can you really say that Frye has from time to time taken over a game? That he's frustrated a defense? (other than ours )

Few of us are out to "tear Charlie down" but we recognize that it's a position that is goin to need an upgrade in the very near future if this team is going to be a better than .500 club.

But the FO may totally disagree as you've pointed out. After all Savage has a long history of liking the wrong QB (Dilfer, Redmond, Boller, Frye, Andersen, etc).

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
The Texans could still say they believe in Carr and they brought Shaub in to compete for the starting job or be a backup. I doubt it will fly, but they have to say something.
---I think Carr is damaged goods. Not as bad as Timid, but close. He has lost his nerve and his mechanics have regressed. I think it would be foolish for the Browns to trade for him. Under any circumstances.


In agree..although I don't know how damaged he is..he has regressed in his progress, but how much is a mental thing about what he has to work with on a horrible offense, plus being hammered every game?
I would prefer we get a vet who at least is competent..

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
Quote:

First and foremost IMO is his arm. He lacks the ability to put zip on his throws




Charlie dosent posses a Brett Farve gun arm, but remember to get zip on the ball, one has to be able to step up into their throw to get zip, when your always throwing off your back foot or as your going down, dosent give you the chance to get zip on any throws,

I do honestly believe Phil realizes two things,
1. Charlie deserves a chance to prove his worth behind this 2007 O-line.
2. We have other just as important needs that need addressed in this years draft other than QB. just as some are saying next year is the year of the RB, Draft Joe Thomas this year and our RB next,. Well next Years draft will once again bring two - three cant miss franchise QB's, the newest, latest & greatest 2008 modles of overhypeness ( Is that a word) the media can sell.

we wont draft a QB Phil will select A.Peterson, Joe Thomas, or trade out of the # 3 pick, either way nothing will happen until were on the clock and Phil sqeezes every inch of value from that # 3 pick.

ClayM57 #71893 03/22/07 08:29 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
j/c

Frye can make whatever throw he needs to make.. He has talent, otherwise he would have not been drafted in the 3rd round.. DO NOT DRAFT A QB, or add another QB to this roster PHIL...

Frye just needs a lil time and he will be fine.. once he feels comfortable behind the line, and he doesnt have to immediately look for a go to guy... He will develop into a fine Quarterback.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Frye can make whatever throw he needs to make

Sorry HBT..that is incorrect, he cannot make all the throws..he hasn't been able to make all the throws..
He is very inaccurate on timing routes as his passes are a bit behind..his long balls are often short..and those intermediate 25-30 yarders downfield are floaters..not bullets.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,836
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,836
I agree...I don't think Winslow caught a seam pass until Anderson got some time.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
Quote:

got some time.




key words there.....

ClayM57 #71897 03/22/07 09:04 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Quote:

Quote:

got some time.




key words there.....




Exactly... like some other person said before.. when Frye has the time to plant his foot.. he can throw that thAng..


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
There were many drives he had plenty of time to plant and step into a throw..and he was off or he tiped off a defender who jumped the route..
Now I'm going to tick some people off , but so what?
If Opie doesn't get Quinn..he better get a vet QB ...well he better do that regardless.
If we go into the season with Frye as the # 1 guy there better be someone in here who can take over when he bogs down..and he will bog down..

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Quote:

There were many drives he had plenty of time to plant and step into a throw..and he was off or he tiped off a defender who jumped the route..
Now I'm going to tick some people off , but so what?
If Opie doesn't get Quinn..he better get a vet QB ...well he better do that regardless.
If we go into the season with Frye as the # 1 guy there better be someone in here who can take over when he bogs down..and he will bog down..




So if we dont draft Quinn... u wanna bring back Trent Dilfer?


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,165
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,165
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

got some time.




key words there.....




Exactly... like some other person said before.. when Frye has the time to plant his foot.. he can throw that thAng..




Only a couple QB's in the entire league get "time" on a regular basis and even those few get time because the D knows that the QB can make a play even if he doesn't get time.

Brady and Manning both discourage D's from blitzing because even on a successful blitz the ball is usually gone by the time they get there. Not just thrown away, they get the ball to the hot route and get yards.

At the other end of the spectrum is Vick, who D's don't want to blitz because they don't want to get into a nationally televised game of freeze tag with him and give up the big run. They game plan to contain him and make him throw the ball.

Either way, few QB's get "time" unless they make it. If Charlie is the type that needs 6 seconds to be a good QB then we might as well face up to it and come up with another plan.

Even if Bentley was healed by Jesus tomorrow and we draft Thomas there's no way he's going to get the "time" that he needs.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Why Dillpickle?
I think Green is the better fit..now that doesn't mean there can't be another QB..he's the one I thought of.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Quote:

Why Dillpickle?
I think Green is the better fit..now that doesn't mean there can't be another QB..he's the one I thought of.




I was just being sarcastic.. lol..

TRUST IN FRYE MAN!!!


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,836
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,836
Quote:

There were many drives he had plenty of time to plant and step into a throw..




Sure there were......but some don't want to pay attention to that.

Bottom line is Anderson looked as good or better than Charlie did.....same line...everything.

So the question one needs to ask is this...Is the back-up playing up to the starters level or is the starter playing down to the back-ups level?

Seeing that neither exactly tore it up, I think it is a easy question to answer.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
so how many wins did Anderson get starting?


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
I trust myself and what I see..
And while I think Frye is a good kid, from what I saw he is incomplete..
I saw a guy bog himself down and not progress much..

If he was putting the ball on the money and the recievers were dropping everything(and I know the plays they blew bigtime) I would be defending him..
But what I saw out of him independant of the mishaps annoyed me..it let me see he isn't a # 1 guy , he will struggle.

When you need a drive maintained and your QB cannot PUT THE BALL where it needs to be in a split second , or runs into a sack , fumbles due to small hands or has problems looking off a defender , you have problems..

I am sick of the list of QB's we've had since ' 99..

I need a QB who can GET THE JOB done..I don't need the hometown discount boy.
BTW let me explain why he was drafted anyway..
We weren't taking a QB # 1 in 05..Opie went strickly by BPA , and that was Edwards..

Second round he had Poole rated higher than anyone and third round was the last round to draft one..since he scouted Frye and he was available he got value for the pick..

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
and from what I see.. ur expecting a 3rd round QB to grow from a QB from Akron to him being a Pro Bowl QB in just one full season.. NO!!

He deserves another year...


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Bottom line is Anderson looked as good or better than Charlie did.....same line...everything.

Only in certain areas..he has the physical tools..but he reminds me of Dilfer..
And his deep throws are very inaccurate..thats where he bogs down.
His decision making is weak also..thats why he reminds me of Dilfer..he gets on a roll then makes a stupid decision and gets picked..
No thanks..he's a backup .

HotYoungTurk ur expecting a 3rd round QB to grow from a QB from Akron to him being a Pro Bowl QB in just one full season.. NO!!

Good grief Chuck ole boy ..did I ever say that?
I said there are things Frye can't overcome..if he progressed in his mechanics and throws , I still wouldn't expect him to be a Pro Bowl guy..

He's a third rounder..a project..and for a QB taken that late the odds don't stack up in his favor..the QB taken right after him..Andrew Walters..is struggling himself.and not just because his support cast is as bad..

In all my posts about any player on the Browns team have you OR ANYONE ever heard me mention that I want a ALL-PRO out of any position?
All I haver ever MAINTAINED is that I want players WHO GET THE JOB DONE..
And it's no less for the QB.

Last edited by Attack Dawg; 03/22/07 09:50 AM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,424
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,424
Quote:

There were many drives he had plenty of time to plant and step into a throw




Now why did "stretch" Armstrong just pop into my head

For the life of me, I can't figure out why people think Charlie is a finished project One full year of starting behind a bad O-line, with TWO different offensive cords. and at least one starting WR who ran bad or wrong routes, and had Roberto Duran hands


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
GMdawg #71909 03/22/07 11:43 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
You fell into the same trap most do..U look at a QB and while it's fair to give a guy a chance to show what he has , you list his failures to the crap around him and not look at him as a individual.
What does Frye bring to the table..the pros and cons?
Not the -WR ran the wrong route or gatoraided a ball or the Oline sucks..
No ...what does Charlie has that makes him a competent QB?
Whats things can't he overcome?

Last edited by Attack Dawg; 03/22/07 12:06 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,424
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,424
He has the respect of his offensive teamates. He has the ability to scramble and make a play out of nothing. He has a strong enough arm (yes just like everybody else I wish it was stronger)

What he still needs to work on is timing ( he AND his recievers) you can't leave them out of it no matter how hard you try, because if you can't trust them to be where they should be, when they should be the QB is the one who is going to look bad.

He also must, and I mean MUST learn how to read defenses pre snap, and during the play. Thats something that takes time, and every QB in the NFL gets better at that the longer they play. IF he can improve in the last two area's IMO he can still be a average or better starting QB. IF he can't learn, then he will never be anything more than a backup.

Quote:

You fell into the same trap most do




No I didn't. The trap is the one I pointed out when Frye was drafted. The trap of throwing a young guy in the fire before he was ready, behind a bad O-line, then calling for his head if he didn't look great. Thats something an average fan who doesn't pay attention to the NFL game does


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
GMdawg #71911 03/22/07 12:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
Texans | Schaub signs
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:22:51 -0700 KFFL.com

John McClain, of the Houston Chronicle, reports the Houston Texans have signed restricted free-agent QB Matt Schaub to a six-year contract worth $48 million with $7 million guaranteed. Schaub will receive $20 million in the first three years. If Schaub stays with the team the last three years of the contract, the Texans will have to pay Schaub a $10 million option bonus in 2010. The Texans paid QB David Carr an $8 million option in 2006 to keep him for the last three years of his contract.


--------------------------------------------------------

CRAZY DEAL....

Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Schaub to Texans

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5