|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,458
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,458 |
Quote:
Colorado voters pass pot legalization Amendment 64 6:53 PM, Nov 6, 2012 |
Written by Raquel Villanueva 9NEWS
DENVER - Voters passed Amendment 64, allowing for the legal, recreational use of marijuana, according to 9NEWS Political Analyst Floyd Ciruli.
Amendment 64 will allow adults over 21 to possess up to an ounce of marijuana. It also would allow people to grow as many as six marijuana plants in private, secure areas.
More than 300 Colorado doctors offered their names in support of Amendment 64. However, the state's chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics urged a "no" vote. Supporters say alcohol does far worse things than marijuana.
"We know that many Coloradans are ready to end the failed policy of marijuana prohibition," Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol spokesperson Betty Aldworth told 9NEWS in September. "We can create a system where marijuana is controlled. We will have an easier time keeping it out of the hands of children."
She cited a recent study by the Centers for Disease Control which suggests marijuana use among high-school students in Colorado dropped between 2009 and 2011 as evidence that medical-marijuana regulation is having an impact.
"In an unregulated, underground market there are no controls," Aldworth said.
Voters rejected Amendment 44 in 2006. That amendment would have legalized the possession of a small amount of marijuana, but did not include the regulatory framework that Amendment 64 possessed.
(KUSA-TV © 2012 Multimedia Holdings Corporation)
web page
And another article
Quote:
Amendment 64 Passes: Colorado Legalizes Marijuana For Recreational Use
Posted: 11/06/2012 11:24 pm EST Updated: 11/07/2012 12:46 am EST
The Rocky Mountain High just got a whole lot higher. On Tuesday night, Amendment 64 -- the measure seeking the legalization of marijuana for recreational use by adults -- was passed by Colorado voters, making Colorado the first state to end marijuana prohibition in the United States.
With about 36 percent of precincts reporting at the time of publishing, 9News and Fox31 report that Amendment 64 has passed.
Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a vocal opponent to the measure, reacted to the passage of A64 in a statement late Tuesday night:
The voters have spoken and we have to respect their will. This will be a complicated process, but we intend to follow through. That said, federal law still says marijuana is an illegal drug so don’t break out the Cheetos or gold fish too quickly.
The passage of the state measure is without historical precedent and the consequences will likely be closely-watched around the world. In an interview with The Huffington Post, the authors/researchers behind the book "Marijuana Legalization: What Everyone Needs To Know" pointed out that the measure in Colorado is truly groundbreaking, comparing it to the legalization that Amsterdam enjoys:
A common error is to believe that the Netherlands has already legalized cannabis (the preferred term for marijuana in Europe). What has been de facto legalized is only the retail sale of 5 grams (about a sixth of an ounce) or less. Production and wholesale distribution is still illegal, and that prohibition is enforced, which is largely why the price of sinsemilla in the “coffee shops” isn’t much different than the price in American dispensaries.
Although Colorado "legalized it," it will be several months, perhaps as long as a year, before Colorado adults 21-and-over can enjoy the legal sale of marijuana. However, the parts of the amendment related to individual behavior will go into effect as soon as Governor Hickenlooper certifies the results of the vote, a proclamation he is obligated to do within 30 days of the election, The Colorado Independent reported.
It's a huge victory for the Campaign To Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol, the pro-pot group behind Amendment 64. "Over the past eight years in Colorado, we have argued that it is irrational to punish adults for choosing to use a product that is far less harmful than alcohol," Mason Tvert, co-director of the campaign, said in a statement. "Today, the voters agreed. Colorado will no longer have laws that steer people toward using alcohol, and adults will be free to use marijuana instead if that is what they prefer. And we will be better off as a society because of it."
This is the second time Colorado voted on legal weed, in 2006 Coloradans voted the measure down, but not in 2012. Tvert told The Huffington Post in an August interview why he thought this year might be different:
The 2006 initiative would have simply removed the penalties for the possession of marijuana legal for individuals 21 years of age or older. The current initiative proposes a fully regulated system of cultivation and sales, which will eliminate the underground marijuana market and generate tens of millions of dollars per year in new revenue and criminal justice savings. It also directs the legislature to regulate the cultivation of industrial hemp, a versatile, popular, and environmentally friendly agricultural crop.
More importantly, voters are more informed about marijuana than ever before. They have also experienced the emergence of a state-regulated medical marijuana system that has not produced any serious problems, but has provided a number of benefits. We now know that marijuana cultivation and sales can be regulated, and that medical marijuana businesses do not contribute to increased crime. We have also seen marijuana use among high school students decrease since the state began implementing regulations, whereas it has increased nationwide where there are no regulations. And, of course, localities and the state have seen how much revenue can be generated through the legal sale of marijuana that would have otherwise gone into the underground market. Voters in Colorado no longer need to imagine what a legal and regulated system of marijuana sales would look like; they have seen it.
It's also worth noting that 2012 is a presidential election year, so we will benefit from increased voter turnout compared to an off-year election like 2006. Historically, the more people who vote, the more support marijuana reform initiatives receive.
On the same night that Colorado passed Amendment 64, Washington state passed Initiative 502 which regulates and taxes sales of small amounts of marijuana for adults, The Associated Press reports. Oregon also had a marijuana measure on the ballot, but as of publishing and with 47 percent of precincts reporting, it looked as if it would not pass.
Under Amendment 64, marijuana is taxed and regulated similar to alcohol and tobacco. It gives state and local governments the ability to control and tax the sale of small amounts of marijuana to adults age 21 and older. According to the Associated Press, analysts project that that tax revenue could generate somewhere between $5 million and $22 million a year in the state. An economist whose study was funded by a pro-pot group projects as much as a $60 million boost by 2017.
"Today, the people of Colorado have rejected the failed policy of marijuana prohibition," Brian Vicente, also a co-director of the Campaign to Regulate Marijuana, said in a statement. "Thanks to their votes, we will now reap the benefits of regulation. We will create new jobs, generation million of dollars in tax revenue, and allow law enforcement to focus on serious crimes. It would certainly be a travesty if the Obama administration used its power to impose marijuana prohibition upon a state whose people have declared, through the democratic process, that they want it to end."
The big unknown still is if the federal government will allow a regulated marijuana market to take shape. Attorney General Eric Holder, who was a vocal opponent of California's legalization initiative in 2010 saying he would "vigorously enforce" federal marijuana prohibition, has continued to remain silent on the issue this year.
In September, Holder was urged by nine former heads of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to take a stand against marijuana legalization again. "To continue to remain silent conveys to the American public and the global community a tacit acceptance of these dangerous initiatives," the nine said in the letter to holder obtained by Reuters.
Earlier this month those same DEA drug warriors joined by former directors of the Office of National Drug Control Policy on a teleconference call to put additional pressure on Holder to speak out against Colorado's marijuana measure as well as similar initiatives on the ballot in Washington state and Oregon.
The drug warriors say that states that legalize marijuana for recreational use will trigger a "Constitutional showdown" with the federal government.
In a report published Sunday by NBC News, President Obama's former senior drug policy advisor said that if the marijuana initiatives pass, a war will be incited between the federal government and the states that pass them. "Once these states actually try to implement these laws, we will see an effort by the feds to shut it down," Sabet said.
But proponents of the legislation say they don't foresee federal agents interfering in states that have legalized cannabis, citing the federal government's silence on the issue this election cycle.
The DOJ has yet to formally announce its enforcement intentions, however, the clearest statement from the DOJ came from Deputy Attorney General James Cole, who said his office's stance on the issue would be "the same as it's always been." During a recent appearance on "60 Minutes" Cole elaborated, "We're going to take a look at whether or not there are dangers to the community from the sale of marijuana and we're going to go after those dangers," Reuters reported.
web page
Wowsers.......
I guress its about time someone stood up and got this legalization joint rolling....and this isn't just mediacal marijuana--this is full on recreational use for 21+.....Niiiiiiice.
Any Colorado dogs on here that feel one way or another about this passing. It'll be interesting to see what the big bad Federal Government does with regard to this development......
hmmmm...
Looking like the War on Drugs is starting to fray....
I wish to wash my Irish wristwatch......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,960
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,960 |
I'll believe it when I see it. I'm thinking this gets tied up in legislation for a while. Very interesting though and a bit surprising.
President - Fort Collins Browns Backers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
One good thing that came from tonight
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419 |
Since when does a state law trump federal law? Besides, heavy duty pain meds don't make these election results easier to take, so don't hope for much out of pot. 
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,306
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,306 |
It's about time 
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195 |
So Tyler, when are you moving?
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
Quote:
Since when does a state law trump federal law?
Besides, heavy duty pain meds don't make these election results easier to take, so don't hope for much out of pot.
It doesn't, all this does it basically tell the residents that the local and state cops won't persue you for marijuana use, but if the feds come calling your still going to go to jail.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955 |
That's awesome. I don't smoke it, but I think those that want to should be able.
#gmstrong #gmlapdance
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
Quote:
That's awesome. I don't smoke it, but I think those that want to should be able.
The way this country is heading, you might change your mind soon 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753 |
I believe both Washington and Oregon also passed similar laws.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,121
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,121 |
Quote:
That's awesome. I don't smoke it, but I think those that want to should be able.
Yep. I don't smoke it, but I did vote yes on this.
On another note, the population of Colorado tripled overnight. 
It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
Quote:
I believe both Washington and Oregon also passed similar laws.
Good for those states. They better be ready for the "Constitutional Showdown" that will be coming, and it will be, at least for the first few years. Once the Feds realize these states aren't going to repeal the new law, they'll eventually get tired and let them be.
I always wondered why the Feds wanted to spend billions on pot cops, pot arrests and pot jails.....when if they just flipped it around, they could be swimming in tax revenue. I know, it's not that simple but throw out all that worthless pot chasing and just start collecting money (and tax it, HARD).
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753 |
Quote:
I always wondered why the Feds wanted to spend billions on pot cops, pot arrests and pot jails.....when if they just flipped it around, they could be swimming in tax revenue. I know, it's not that simple but throw out all that worthless pot chasing and just start collecting money (and tax it, HARD).
This is exactly why I voted for it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850 |
Quote:
Quote:
I always wondered why the Feds wanted to spend billions on pot cops, pot arrests and pot jails.....when if they just flipped it around, they could be swimming in tax revenue. I know, it's not that simple but throw out all that worthless pot chasing and just start collecting money (and tax it, HARD).
This is exactly why I voted for it
you think state police not helping the Feds on their pot busts is going to make the Feds spend LESS on it?
not saying right or wrong here, but I fully expect a push for more spending on the Feds (if these measures even make it out of the Supreme Court)
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753 |
Well, first of all, I was wrong on Oregon - it failed.
Second, the state of Oregon spends about 60 million a year on law enforcement, corrections, and judicial costs on the enforcement of pot laws. Not all of this would go away, but the majority would As well it was expected to bring in about 140 million in taxes each year. Unless the Feds were going to spend $125 million plus per year in Oregon alone, it would have worked out as a net positive.
There were other reasons I voted for it as well, but taxation was top of the list.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Colorado is getting even more Mile
High (passes Amendment 64)
|
|