|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
Quote:
does that make Sergeant Schultz a genius?
I'd have voted for him. 
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456 |
Quote:
Quote:
does that make Sergeant Schultz a genius?
I'd have voted for him.

If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,698 Likes: 1675
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,698 Likes: 1675 |
I just see it as Lurie slowly turned things over to everyone else. Since they have been friends since childhood from what I have read, it just doesn't seem like the kind of thing someone would do without having what they believe to be very just cause.
So at this stage, I am very cautious in watching the moves he makes and the talent we bring in.
He does say all of the right things but he hasn't been here very long. So I'm more interested in the evidence as things go along with him. And a lot of people know how to "say the right things". That doesn't really pertain to the way one conducts business.
In all matters concerning the Browns, if I feel a sense of negativity about someone, I certainly hope I'm wrong. But he does command a HUGE amount of control on a lot of matters.
So I certainly am not just going along for the ride with him and feel that being honest about my concerns is the right way to approach it.
For all of our sakes I certainly hope that Banner shows the opposite of what my feelings are on this matter.
Just like the hiring of Chud. I like the hire and expressed it in the coaching thread. So I will gladly give this FO credit where I feel it deserves to be given.
I do feel it's rather funny how so many seemed to take me to task on matters I did't like, yet nobody seemed to take any notice when I broke down the hiring of Chud and that I liked him being hired as our HC.
But that's how I will conduct things. When I feel they did well, I'll be more than happy to say so. But I won't just give them card blanche' and try to rationalise moves that I don't feel deserve to be defended.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370 |
Quote:
Quote:
There are only a handful of teams that would even give Weeden a shot at starting for them, and fewer still that he could actually earn the job in an open competition. Sadly, the Browns are probably the ONLY team that would consider giving him the starting job without him earning it.
Really? Are you talking about this regime, or the past regime? Because this new regime hasn't done anything to even remotely give anyone a clue as to what their plans are moving forward and as far as I know, you would have nothing to base this claim on.
I said teams, not regimes. Tell us all which team that would name Brandon Weeden their starting QB? I'm interested to know?
Quote:
Secondly, if you plan to run a vertical offense, who did the Browns have other than Weeden that had the tools to even attempt that with in training camp last year? They had already given McCoy a year and knew he wasn't the answer at the position.
It could be argued that McCoy did better than Weeden, given the stats (yeah, I know, eye test and all that). Even on the eye test, I don't know that I would give Weeden the edge, but I'm looking at it subjectively. We could do a statistical comparison between Weeden and other 'cannon' arms in the NFL ranks. Blah, blah, blah.
Quote:
So the fact of the matter is the Browns didn't have anyone to "compete" with Weeden last year. But let's not dwell on that.
I don't agree. Colt McCoy was there and so was Thaddeus Lewis. Just because there was no 'competition' and the job was handed to Weeden without his having to earn it, doesn't mean that there wasn't anyone to compete with Weeden.
Personally, I think that was one of the determining factors to Holmgren's and Shurmur's departures. Drafting Weeden, I suggest to you, was also one of the reasons that Heckert was fired. But that's another subject altogether.
Quote:
Quote:
Is it any wonder why the Browns suck so bad, year after year after year?
The Chud O took DA to a 10 win season and the playoffs. But to try to invent some story that there was actually someone in training camp that would have been true competition for Weeden last year is just silly.
We didn't make the playoffs with Derek Anderson as our QB. And you talk about me inventing some story? 
Quote:
Even in pre-season last year, Thad was exciting to watch, but his mental mistakes were many. After maturing a bit more over the course of the season, he looked much better by this seasons end.
He looked like a QB under a Shurmur led offense. As a QB coming off the bench but one that took all the first team snaps before the final game. He should have looked as good as he did.
Quote:
At 29, they had to give Weeden the reigns. There wasn't time for him to be schooled. You make it sound as if McCoy or Thad were actually people who could compete for the job at thetime. When everyone observing training camp agreed that Weeden was head and shoulders above the competition.
And that's the problem. They never should have drafted Weeden (hence one of the primary reasons that they got fired - and 5 wins didn't help any) in the first place. He is too old to teach. He should already know what to do and it's obvious that he doesn't. And they were able to compete for the job but weren't even given the shot because the FO couldn't admit that they burned a first round pick on a 29-y.o. rookie QB. They HAD painted themselves into the corner and had to start him due to his age combined with where they drafted him. They did it to themselves AND to the Cleveland Browns.
It won't surprise me if Weeden is given an opportunity to win the QB competition, but he'll have QB competition (yes, from McCoy and probably a draft pick or UDFA pick-up). It's possible that he's not even on the team next season. They probably wouldn't cut him outright (although I wouldn't be upset if they did) and seek to trade him for whatever the best value they received in return. It wouldn't even matter if it was to an AFC North team.
Quote:
When you really have no legit QB on your roster and you draft a QB in the first round, you play him. They did.
It's your view that there wasn't a legit QB on the roster. And you don't just play a QB in the first round and play him. Green Bay didn't with Aaron Rodgers. He sat for 3 years before moving into the starting job. What you don't do is draft a 29-y.o. player (at QB or anywhere else) in the first round. It had NEVER happened before until the Browns did it last year. Chris Weinke wasn't drafted in the first round and he even won the Heisman Trophy,
Quote:
To remotely suggest the same will happen this year is based on pure speculation with no basis. A far more logical conclusion this year would be that McCoy in no way fits the style of O that Chud wishes to run. So McCoy being gone and another QB being picked up to compete and that fits Chud's system will be brought in is a far more logical train of thought.
You speak of speculation without any basis and then go on and speculate about McCoy not being on the team. And there is basis for thinking that McCoy would be here next year. It was reported that Banner told him that McCoy would "play a role" in the next coaches plans. Maybe the next coach plans on trading him, but that would only be speculation.
Also, you make unfounded assumptions that Weeden fits into Chud's system. What proof do you have of that?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,803 Likes: 280
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,803 Likes: 280 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Then why exactly did Haslam state we learned alot as we went through the process of talking to people?
The last fortune cookie I opened said the man that knows everything knows nothing...
Lol mine said The man that tries to lead others doesnt follow himself.
Mine said: Beware of cookies bearing fortunes
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,803 Likes: 280
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,803 Likes: 280 |
Quote:
biased hyperbolic rhetoric.
That was fun to read 
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370 |
Quote:
Don't worry the draft is coming up. People will turn their complaining energy to that soon enough.
Who's the oldest player in the draft? Has that person been identified? Where are Holmgren and Heckert and Shurmur landing? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456 |
Quote:
Quote:
Don't worry the draft is coming up. People will turn their complaining energy to that soon enough.
Who's the oldest player in the draft? Has that person been identified? Where are Holmgren and Heckert and Shurmur landing?
The correct question is who is Banner targeting. Sorry but Heckert and his drafting creating one of the youngest teams in the league days are gone. Let me know when we get an actual GM and then we can talk about if that said GM is even close to Heckert. We wont know if the Gm is good for 3 years.
Glad your so happy about it. 
.
If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 601
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 601 |
Thank you for the kind words DJ.. I was ghosting the past few years, just didn't have much of anything to say of substance during that time... You know.. Kinda like Daman..  But on a serious note, just was hard to have the kind of passion for our team when you knew the management was making idiotic decisions such as the Shurmer hire.. I knew it was coming after Mangini got shown the door and was hoping that Holmgren would have atleast given us an Upgrade at the position but water under the bridge.. For what it's worth I did follow the draft threads that you and a few of the others put together but been so busy since coming back stateside that I find less leasure time these past few.. Can't relay the amount of excitement I have over the Chud hire though.. I JUST know that THIS time it WILL finally be better.. Not because it can't get worse but because he is surrounding himself with proven winners and we were lucky that Heckert didn't leave us with an empty cupboard... You still over in Deuchland?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,692
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,692 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Don't worry the draft is coming up. People will turn their complaining energy to that soon enough.
Who's the oldest player in the draft? Has that person been identified? Where are Holmgren and Heckert and Shurmur landing?
The correct question is who is Banner targeting. Sorry but Heckert and his drafting creating one of the youngest teams in the league days are gone. Let me know when we get an actual GM and then we can talk about if that said GM is even close to Heckert. We wont know if the Gm is good for 3 years.
Glad your so happy about it. 
.
I have a feeling with all the love Heckert had here (myself included), the next guy will be reading a lot of hate mail for the next couple of years.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331 |
Quote:
I have a feeling with all the love Heckert had here (myself included), the next guy will be reading a lot of hate mail for the next couple of years.
I agree.
Losing Holmgren, no one cares.
Losing Shurmur, most people are happy.
But losing Heckert, and everyone is upset.
I bet if we kept Heckert and hired Chud, everyone would be on the Chud train, lol
UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456 |
Quote:
Quote:
I have a feeling with all the love Heckert had here (myself included), the next guy will be reading a lot of hate mail for the next couple of years.
I agree.
Losing Holmgren, no one cares.
Losing Shurmur, most people are happy.
But losing Heckert, and everyone is upset.
I bet if we kept Heckert and hired Chud, everyone would be on the Chud train, lol
Im already on the Chud train the difference is I would be more forgiving of banner.
If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,511 Likes: 166
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,511 Likes: 166 |
Quote:
Banner had a lot of smart things to say in that interview.
People should get past all the talk that he doesn't know football, only business. He's sounding smarter and smarter every day...
That actually was my favorite interview that I've heard him do... really nice interview... if anything it sounds like the FO and Chud are completly on the same page...
<><
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456 |
while I can agree there are problably better people then Heckert out there we have not had one before in our whole time sence the re-start. It will take alot for a new GM to at least build confidence from the fans for sure.
If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,850 Likes: 159
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,850 Likes: 159 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Must admit we would have been better off the past few years if it were you and Mourg doing our drafts rather than the clowns that were .. !
wie konntest du mich vergessen?
Welcome back DS 
Hope you post regularly again, as this place needs more good posters
Well do I count as a good poster? Cuze I can't post here while at work..the firewall thinks this site and Draft Express is a game site..
Dude, you need to find a new job 
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,411 Likes: 463
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,411 Likes: 463 |
Quote:
Quote:
Banner had a lot of smart things to say in that interview.
People should get past all the talk that he doesn't know football, only business. He's sounding smarter and smarter every day...
That actually was my favorite interview that I've heard him do... really nice interview... if anything it sounds like the FO and Chud are completly on the same page...
I have to agree with that. I never really thought the guy was some arch villain ....... but he looked a lot better in that interview than in most.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693 |
Quote:
Quote:
biased hyperbolic rhetoric.
That was fun to read
Three words that fairly summarize modern day journalism.

![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/hfMNC7T.jpg) "I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski "Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield #gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,698 Likes: 1675
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,698 Likes: 1675 |
Quote:
I said teams, not regimes. Tell us all which team that would name Brandon Weeden their starting QB? I'm interested to know?
Once again, do you mean at the beginning of this past season, or going into this season? Considering it appears that they felt Colt wasn't the answer at the QB position and they invested a first round draft pick in weeden, I feel they felt the need to start him last year.
If you mean this upcoming season, I haven't seen anything to indicate they plan not to bring in competition for the starting QB position. Do you?
Quote:
I don't agree. Colt McCoy was there and so was Thaddeus Lewis. Just because there was no 'competition' and the job was handed to Weeden without his having to earn it, doesn't mean that there wasn't anyone to compete with Weeden.
Colt had one start this year and played in three games for a grand total of 79 yards with 4.65 yards per completion. The proof is in the pudding. Like I said, they saw a year of Colt and simply did not feel he had the skill set to run the type of O they wished to run. If that's the conclusion you have came to, it's time to move on at that point.
Quote:
Personally, I think that was one of the determining factors to Holmgren's and Shurmur's departures. Drafting Weeden, I suggest to you, was also one of the reasons that Heckert was fired. But that's another subject altogether.
I do feel that having been here for three seasons and not being set at the QB position did play some role in their departure.
Quote:
We didn't make the playoffs with Derek Anderson as our QB. And you talk about me inventing some story? 
Yes you busted me. It was not done in jest. I have no idea when the Browns have and have not made the playoffs and I truely believed everyone on this board would believe every word of it. What was I thinking? I know you can rent a sense of humor and I even heard it reporeted from an unnamed source that you can get a lease with an option to buy at....... www.lighten up a liitle.com

Quote:
He looked like a QB under a Shurmur led offense. As a QB coming off the bench but one that took all the first team snaps before the final game. He should have looked as good as he did.
So you're saying that in the end it really wouldn't have made any difference who the QB was and it was Shurmer who caused things to dail? If so, why are you trying to debate the QB issue?
Quote:
And that's the problem. They never should have drafted Weeden (hence one of the primary reasons that they got fired - and 5 wins didn't help any) in the first place. He is too old to teach. He should already know what to do and it's obvious that he doesn't. And they were able to compete for the job but weren't even given the shot because the FO couldn't admit that they burned a first round pick on a 29-y.o. rookie QB. They HAD painted themselves into the corner and had to start him due to his age combined with where they drafted him. They did it to themselves AND to the Cleveland Browns.
I believe you're saying pretty much the same thing I said accept with a slightly different viewpoint. Weeden was a make or break decision for them. I have also said that I didn't see a gradual and marked improvement in him over the course of the season. I won't say Weeden can't get better and be a "good" but not great QB. But things certainly didn't lay out as the prior FO intended it too which is only obvious to anyone watching the Browns over the course of this past season.
Quote:
It won't surprise me if Weeden is given an opportunity to win the QB competition, but he'll have QB competition (yes, from McCoy and probably a draft pick or UDFA pick-up).
And what is it about McCoy that makes you think he fits into the picture here? I don't really think he posesses the accuracy with the long ball that they are looking for in the big picture. What we did see of him on the field this year was putrid at best.
So since neither of us know what this new staff has in mind in terms of the B position, I won't make some bold claim that has zero evidence to substantiate in terms of McCoy. Usually any time you have an entire new regime they want to install "their guy". Neither Colt nor Weeden are "their guy" interms of them selecting him or being tied to him.
Quote:
It's possible that he's not even on the team next season. They probably wouldn't cut him outright (although I wouldn't be upset if they did) and seek to trade him for whatever the best value they received in return. It wouldn't even matter if it was to an AFC North team.
Yet another very bold prediction with nothing to substantiate it. Now if you were speaking of McCoy, I think this scenario would be far more likely. I believe Thad is much closer to what they're looking for than McCoy based on what they said they intended to run here.
So if I were to venture a guess, we would have Weeden, Thad and either a FA or draft pick in the QB position next year. Once again, I'm not going to sit here and make some bold prediction about something that is a huge unknown. But this seems more likely to me given the "vertical game" they intend to run.
Had Colt have shown great accuracy and his arm had shown it was stregthening over time, I would tend to lean more in your direction. But in the playing time he was afforded this season, if anything he looked like he had regressed, not progressed.
Quote:
It's your view that there wasn't a legit QB on the roster. And you don't just play a QB in the first round and play him. Green Bay didn't with Aaron Rodgers. He sat for 3 years before moving into the starting job.
RG3, Luck, Tannehill and Wilson. No, a team should never star their first round selection right out of the gate.
Seriously? 
Most teams draft a QB in the first round because they need one. Not because they have a Favre in his prime. You may wish to take another look at your Aaron Rodgers scenario and see that in his case, that was the acception, not the rule over the last decade in terms of first round picks.
Quote:
What you don't do is draft a 29-y.o. player (at QB or anywhere else) in the first round. It had NEVER happened before until the Browns did it last year. Chris Weinke wasn't drafted in the first round and he even won the Heisman Trophy,
I don't see that it worked out so good for this former FO, but when you don't have a QB, you go get one and repeat that process until you find one. I don't see anyone kicking and screaming that they picked the right QB here. So I'm not sure the point you're trying to make in all of this.
Quote:
You speak of speculation without any basis and then go on and speculate about McCoy not being on the team. And there is basis for thinking that McCoy would be here next year. It was reported that Banner told him that McCoy would "play a role" in the next coaches plans.
Which "next coach" was that exactly? Do you think they knew in advance that they were going to hire Chud at that time? Now if you believe there was some back room deal with Chud the entire time and that everything else they did was simply a smoke screen, that's your peerogative. But I myself find that line of thinking more than just a little far fetched The difference is I openly admit that I'm speculating. You on the other hand have been making statements as a point of fact.
Quote:
Maybe the next coach plans on trading him, but that would only be speculation.
Also, you make unfounded assumptions that Weeden fits into Chud's system. What proof do you have of that?
It's all speculation and I have made that point quite clear. The indicators I have is that Chud said he wanted a vertical attack. That woild indicate a QB who has a fairly strong arm. If they do not acquire another QB with a strong arm, I believe they would require a QB with very good accuracy and decision making like an Alex Smith.
I don't see either of those things in Colt. Is it possible that Colt will still be here next year? At this point, anything is possible. I just try to look at the comments made and look at the skill set, or lack there of as the case may be and go from there.
To me, Thad represents the skill set to go vertical much more than Colt does. And I really don't see them sending Weeden packing because he has a much stronger arm than Colt with which to go vertical.
So unlike you, I'm not going to sit here and say who will and won't be on the roster next year at the QB position, but I will look at what Chud said he wanted to implement and see who best fits that plan that we currently have on our roster.
Carry on......

Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,850 Likes: 159
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,850 Likes: 159 |
Not sure if this has been posted,, pretty fluffy but good article about Chud the Man vs Chud the Coach Quote:
Loyalty a big motivation for new Cleveland Browns coach Rob Chudzinski chud-friends-brady-photo.jpg Regardless of where his football life would take him, Rob Chudzinski (second from left) remained close to his high-school teammates in Toledo (from left) Bert Brady, P.J. Miller and John Ragan. When Miller dealt with a terminal illness, the man who became the Browns' new head coach became a source of support for a family in crisis. (Photo by Photo courtesy Bert Brady) Tom Reed, The Plain Dealer By Tom Reed, The Plain Dealer on January 12, 2013 at 10:18 PM, updated January 13, 2013 at 8:59 AM Print View/Post Comments No one is more deserving of this opportunity than Chud. I think the stars are aligned.
BEREA, Ohio -- Five years ago, Rob Chudzinski sat in a Cleveland Clinic waiting room discussing friendship, promises and the mortality of a man he had known since high school.
It was the summer of 2008 and Chudzinski listened to P.J. Miller calmly speak about the future of his family without him in it. The Toledo native and Strongsville resident was losing an eight-year battle with cancer.
Chudzinski's mind reeled as his fellow Toledo St. John's football co-captain laid out the sobering details and asked if he and a few close friends would keep watch over his wife, Jane, and their three children. His two boys, Jack and Matt, showed tremendous football potential and Miller wondered if the buddy everyone called "Chud" would shepherd them through their careers.
Fifteen years earlier, Chudzinski had toasted Miller as the best man in the couple's wedding. Six months later, he would eulogize him, asking a roomful of mourners to repeat "We thank you, P.J.," every time the coach recited another of Miller's good deeds.
On this day, however, Chudzinski's sole focus was honoring his friend's solemn request.
"He asked a few of us to help out," the Browns' new coach recalled this week. "It hit me square on that day I needed to live up to my responsibility."
At his introductory news conference, the lifelong Browns fan spoke Friday about wanting to deliver a winner to Cleveland. Chudzinski, 44, is a surprise choice to many, an accomplished assistant with no head coaching experience at the college or NFL level.
But 19-year-old Jack Miller believes nobody will work harder to turn around a franchise. He knows first-hand Chudzinski's loyalty and sacrifice, a man who friends say embodies the Jesuit brotherhood and the "men for others" philosophy.
"Chud is someone who lives up to his end of a bargain," Jack said by phone Saturday. "He would die before he would let down the people who are closest to him. I know I'm biased when I say this, but I think he is going to make a great coach for the Browns."
Same school to same street
Chudzinski has won national championships as a player and coach at the University of Miami. He transformed Derek Anderson into a Pro Bowler for one season in Cleveland and coordinated an offense that helped Cam Newton become an NFL Rookie of the Year in Carolina. But his oldest friends and best memories are rooted in Toledo and northwest Ohio.
The residents of Lucas and Wood counties are thrilled one of their own has become the Browns 14th full-time head coach. On Monday, St. John's students plan to wear Browns shirts to school and gather for a photo, board member and good friend Bert Brady said. They plan to send it to Chudzinski.
The son of an Ohio Air National Guard pilot, Chudzinski's passion for the Browns followed him through his formative years as the family moved from Toledo to Bowling Green to Fremont and back to Toledo. His love for the team has been well chronicled: Munching on dog biscuits, playing backyard football pretending to be tight end Ozzie Newsome, propping a television in the windows of his aunt's home to watch games in the chilly outdoors to simulate life in the Dawg Pound. chud-friends-2-brady.jpg As a football player at Toledo St. John High School in the 1980s, Rob Chudzinski (87) ran with a circle of athletic friends that included Bert Brady (86), Tom Beier (31) and close friend P.J. Miller (60). Photo courtesy Bert Brady
But it was at St. John's where the dreams of a slow-footed, yet sure-handed tight end manifested themselves. Chudzinski ran with a circle of athletic friends that included Brady, John Ragan, Mark Fabian and the gregarious, barrel-chested Miller. Each enjoyed success after graduation and many were influenced by former St. John's football coach Fred Beier, who died in 2004.
"You talk about discipline, you talk about toughness, you talk about work ethic that we need as part of a football team and the foundation of a football team," Chudzinski said. "Fred was instrumental in teaching those things and stressing those things."
Chudzinski carried those lessons to Coral Gables, Fla.
In a border town split between loyalties for Michigan and Ohio State, Chudzinski's friends became rabid Miami supporters as he won national titles in 1987 and '89. His playing days behind him, they watched as he ascended from a 27-year-old graduate assistant to a Hurricanes coach who molded the careers of future Pro Bowlers Frank Gore, Andre Johnson, Willis McGahee, Bryant McKinnie, Clinton Portis, Jeremy Shockey and Kellen Winslow.
"During football season we didn't hear much from him because he was laser focused," Brady said. "But when it was over he always came home and he was always the same guy -- humble as hell."
In 2004, former Browns coach Butch Davis hired him as the team's tight end coach and after a two-year stint in San Diego he returned to Cleveland as the club's offensive coordinator under Romeo Crennel. He settled in the Strongsville development of Waterford Crossing and lived on the same street as two of his St. John's buddies, Fabian and Miller.
Miller, who worked in sales, had relocated to Cleveland after college and started a family with his wife, Jane. Friends teased him about being the "president of the Chud Fan Club" and digging a tunnel that ran between their homes. They had all grown up Browns fans and here was one of their own calling plays for a team that finished 10-6 in 2007 and sent four offensive players to the Pro Bowl.
"It was so much fun," said Chudzinski, who's married with three children. "Our wives probably didn't always appreciate it because we acted more guys in high school than in our 40s."
It wasn't so bad for the offspring, either. The Miller boys marveled at the good fortune of living in a neighborhood that included former Browns assistant Chuck Pagano and players such as Courtney Brown and Ross Verba. Jack, who attended St. Edward High School for two years, babysat for the Chudzinskis in exchange for game tickets. He met all the players and stood in the stadium tunnel after games, once shaking hands with Baltimore Ravens linebacker Ray Lewis.
"It was a fairy tale, it was a surreal life for a kid who grew up a Browns fan," said Jack Miller, who also has a younger sister. Molly, 15. "Chud always hooked us up, he always took care of us."
Their father, P.J., who was ailing from Hodgkin's lymphoma, realized as much. As the boys showed promise on the football field, the president of the Chud Fan Club knew who he wanted to guide them after he was gone.
Promise kept
During Chudzinski's introductory news conference, owner Jimmy Haslam expressed confidence his new coach would earn the players' respect. Fabian witnessed it at a 2008 fund raiser for Miller. The Browns offensive coordinator encouraged his players to attend and participate in a silent auction. Anderson, Brady Quinn and Josh Cribbs, among others, donated time and money.
"I was so impressed that I went around and thanked the players," Fabian said. "All they kept telling me was, 'We're here for a good cause and we're here because of Chud. We would do anything for him.'"
P.J. Miller died on Feb. 18, 2009 at 40, surrounded by his closest friends. A few days later, Chudzinski celebrated his life with a eulogy, its message still potent enough to move men such as Fabian to tears.
"He was such a good man and a good father," Chudzinski said. "He and Jane did such a great job raising those kids. They are so mature for their age and they're really good students."
The family returned to Toledo three years ago and Jack and Matt played football for their father's alma mater. All of dad's friends assisted in his children's mentorship.
As the boys went through the college recruiting process, Chudzinski counseled them at every turn. They talked about the best fits. They talked about the best programs. Mostly, they talked about life and honoring the wishes of a father.
Matt Miller, who turns 18 on Sunday, has accepted a full ride to Wisconsin. The youngest boy still speaks to Chudzinski three times a week as he prepares for college. Jack Miller earned a scholarship to Michigan two years ago. He's expected to be the Wolverines' starting center next season as a red-shirt sophomore. He wears the No. 60 in tribute to his dad's uniform number at St. John's.
Jack Miller plays for Wolverines coach Brady Hoke, who spent eight seasons as a Michigan assistant before returning nine years later to guide the program. The 6-foot-4, 288-pound center sees similarities between Hoke and Chudzinski.
"They understand what tradition means and what it means to the fans," Jack Miller said. "No one is more deserving of this opportunity than Chud. I think the stars are aligned. ... He wants to be here and no one will expect more of himself."
Jack Miller's father had known it for years.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2013/01/loyalty_a_big_motivation_for_n.html#incart_2box
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,302 Likes: 638
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,302 Likes: 638 |
Quote:
The last fortune cookie I opened said the man that knows everything knows nothing...
So glad to see you know everything 
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,850 Likes: 159
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,850 Likes: 159 |
Quote:
Colt had one start this year and played in three games for a grand total of 79 yards with 4.65 yards per completion.
LOL,, when we've just had a season like this, I try my best to put it out of my head, but I thought that Colt came into a game for Weeden,, I didn't think he actually started a game. IN that game, he was injured, they brought in some other QB as a backup and put lewis in to finish the last game..
I thought,, But like I said I try to forget that stuff so i could be wrong
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370 |
Quote:
Once again, do you mean at the beginning of this past season, or going into this season?
Your choice. It applies in to the past 2012 season or the upcoming 2013 season. What other team in the NFL would have Weeden as their starting QB?
Quote:
Considering it appears that they felt Colt wasn't the answer at the QB position and they invested a first round draft pick in Weeden, I feel they felt the need to start him last year.
They previous Browns front office didn't feel that Weeden could be sat. It's true. Weeden couldn't be sat because of his age. It shouldn't have anything to do with his draft position and if it did, then that partially explains why they got fired.
Quote:
If you mean this upcoming season, I haven't seen anything to indicate they plan not to bring in competition for the starting QB position. Do you?
Not at all. I think there will be competition at the QB position, but I was responding to someone else stating that the job is already Weeden's. If the new front office feels that way, then it's my view that they should be fired. Weeden has not EARNED the job. Somehow, I don't think that the new front office has any allegiance to Weeden and that he shouldn't feel as if they do.
Quote:
Colt had one start this year and played in three games for a grand total of 79 yards with 4.65 yards per completion. The proof is in the pudding. Like I said, they saw a year of Colt and simply did not feel he had the skill set to run the type of O they wished to run. If that's the conclusion you have came to, it's time to move on at that point.
When you refer to 'they', you're making reference to the past. We don't know what the new front office will do. With the 'vertical attack' that we hear about and know from Chudzinski's past history, he might go with Weeden, but that's not a foregone conclusion.
Quote:
I do feel that having been here for three seasons and not being set at the QB position did play some role in their departure.
But you would think that going with Weeden in the first round would make that QB position to be 'set', wouldn't you? Or, was drafting Weeden in the first place (thus keeping the QB carousel going) part of the reason? My view is that the latter is part of the reason and Weeden's age just adds to the reasons.
Quote:
Yes you busted me. It was not done in jest. I have no idea when the Browns have and have not made the playoffs and I truly believed everyone on this board would believe every word of it. What was I thinking? I know you can rent a sense of humor and I even heard it reported from an unnamed source that you can get a lease with an option to buy at....... www.lighten up a liitle.com

Oh, I know it was just an error. Most times, a 10-6 record is enough to get your team into the playoffs. Just ask Lovie Smith about it. But you didn't mean it in jest. It's okay, we all have brain farts.
Quote:
So you're saying that in the end it really wouldn't have made any difference who the QB was and it was Shurmur who caused things to dail? If so, why are you trying to debate the QB issue?
I'm saying that Thaddeus Lewis looked like a QB under a Shurmur led offense. And as for the QB issue, I'm just telling you why I think that the Weeden selection was a bad one and led (at least in part) to the firing of the coaching staff and the front office.
Quote:
I believe you're saying pretty much the same thing I said accept with a slightly different viewpoint. Weeden was a make or break decision for them. I have also said that I didn't see a gradual and marked improvement in him over the course of the season. I won't say Weeden can't get better and be a "good" but not great QB. But things certainly didn't lay out as the prior FO intended it too which is only obvious to anyone watching the Browns over the course of this past season.
Maybe. I just don't think that Weeden will ever be even a good QB at the NFL level. I don't think there is anyone that can teach Weeden to be a good QB.
Quote:
And what is it about McCoy that makes you think he fits into the picture here? I don't really think he posesses the accuracy with the long ball that they are looking for in the big picture. What we did see of him on the field this year was putrid at best.
Other than it was reported that McCoy 'fits into the plans of the next coach'. But, because he's got better command of the position than Brandon Weeden does. What they saw of McCoy (and it seems to be a grudge thing with me) on the field was purely coincidental and it couldn't be avoided in all frankness. They were simply forced to play him.
Also, looking at the games and confirming it with the stats, McCoy is actually more accurate down the field than Weeden is.
Weeden (2012)
McCoy (2011)
Quote:
So since neither of us know what this new staff has in mind in terms of the QB position, I won't make some bold claim that has zero evidence to substantiate in terms of McCoy.
http://www.waitingfornextyear.com/2013/01/nfl-report-colt-mccoy-might-be-in-browns-future-plans/
We'll have to see if it's true or what those plans are. Maybe it's trade talks, but I don't think you can take it as such. And it might be that the new front office likes him and intends to keep him on the roster. Nobody really knows, but to say it's a 'unsubstantiated' claim isn't quite right.
Of course, that was when Chip Kelly was supposedly the Browns frontrunner for the HC job. Even so, I don't think that necessarily changes anything about what the front office plans to do in regards to Colt McCoy. He is younger than Brandon Weeden and actually beat good teams (NE and NO) who had their starting QBs playing. Weeden beat Cincy with Dalton but nobody else. Even the SD victory wouldn't qualify. They were 7-9 but beat Roethlisberger and nobody else.
Quote:
I didn't make such a claim. Usually any time you have an entire new regime they want to install "their guy". Neither Colt nor Weeden are "their guy" in terms of them selecting him or being tied to him.
This is true, but I think it's probably safe to say that Weeden won't be handed the job. Nobody knows, but they could bring in someone in free agency, draft another QB or have a true competition among those currently on the roster, or a combination of some or even all of them.
Quote:
Yet another very bold prediction with nothing to substantiate it. Now if you were speaking of McCoy, I think this scenario would be far more likely. I believe Thad is much closer to what they're looking for than McCoy based on what they said they intended to run here.
They intend to be a more explosive offense. They intend to score more points. It's obvious that they won't be running the WCO, but they could open it up like Seattle or even San Francisco has (did they ever do a number on GB's WCO?) and McCoy is better suited to that than Weeden is. Maybe they'll go vertical, in which case, Weeden's arm (and I saw some underthrows deep this past year) may be better suited, but he has to improve his accuracy. And in windy or otherwise bad conditions, that won't work very well at all. Can Weeden make those adjustments? You'll have to make a convincing case for that. I wouldn't want to be the one to try and make that case.
Quote:
So if I were to venture a guess, we would have Weeden, Thad and either a FA or draft pick in the QB position next year. Once again, I'm not going to sit here and make some bold prediction about something that is a huge unknown. But this seems more likely to me given the "vertical game" they intend to run.
I still think that Weeden is the odd man out. For a number of reasons. He proved nothing this past year and it could be said that he actually regressed. Then, it's easier to replace a QB with an arm than one with QB smarts. Also, looking at the accuracy problems of the 'vertical game' with Weeden, I don't see that happening. He'll have to improve his accuracy and at nearly 30 y.o., I don't think he can be taught to do so. His body won't make the necessary adjustments in the mechanics.
Quote:
Had Colt have shown great accuracy and his arm had shown it was strengthening over time, I would tend to lean more in your direction. But in the playing time he was afforded this season, if anything he looked like he had regressed, not progressed.
Okay. And we'll have to agree to disagree. Also, as I stated previously, McCoy had a grudge against him by the previous front office and coaching staff. He stated in a post-game press conference in 2011 that he wasn't allowed to audible (and you do what the coach wants so you can keep your job) and then following the concussion he received against Putzburgh, his father's comments were used against McCoy. They never recovered from that black eye to their credibility.
Quote:
RG3, Luck, Tannehill and Wilson. No, a team should never star their first round selection right out of the gate.
Seriously? 
That's not what I'm saying at all. We all knew the situation with Luck and RG3 and even Tannehill and Wilson (who EARNED their jobs). Furthermore, Wilson was a 3rd round selection, not a 1st round one.
But, now you're just reaching for straws. The previous front office knew from the time that they selected Brandon Weeden that he would be their starter. They cast their lots with a 28-y.o. rookie QB and lost. Weeden simply is too old to be a rookie QB trying to learn on the job. I don't think that Chudzinski will give Weeden the job just because the previous morons selected him in the first round.
Quote:
Most teams draft a QB in the first round because they need one. Not because they have a Favre in his prime. You may wish to take another look at your Aaron Rodgers scenario and see that in his case, that was the exception, not the rule over the last decade in terms of first round picks.
Favre wasn't in his prime when Rodgers was selected. He was on the downside of his career. And I know the situation when Rodgers was selected. He was the exception to the rule, but he was also a young QB when he was taken, not already a 28-y.o. QB. In fact, Weeden is older than Rodgers and he has just a single year of NFL experience, not 8 years like Rodgers does.
Quote:
I don't see that it worked out so good for this former FO, but when you don't have a QB, you go get one and repeat that process until you find one. I don't see anyone kicking and screaming that they picked the right QB here. So I'm not sure the point you're trying to make in all of this.
What you don't do, even if you don't have a QB, is draft a 28-y.o. rookie. That is, not if you want to remain employed in your job as a team's president, a team's general manager or a team's head coach. And you certainly don't draft him in the first round.
But you are making exactly the case that Weeden was the right choice and that the new front office will keep him on the team because the last one's selected him in the first round. I am under no such allusion. The new group aren't beholden to keep Weeden on the roster just because he was drafted with a first rounder the year before. If he is that much better than McCoy as many, including you, seem to suggest, then he should draw that much more interests from teams needing QBs and the Browns should get that much more compensation for him.
Quote:
Which "next coach" was that exactly? Do you think they knew in advance that they were going to hire Chud at that time? Now if you believe there was some back room deal with Chud the entire time and that everything else they did was simply a smoke screen, that's your peerogative. But I myself find that line of thinking more than just a little far fetched The difference is I openly admit that I'm speculating. You on the other hand have been making statements as a point of fact.
I have no reason to think that they had any particular coach in mind. Of course, I expected them to do their jobs and interview candidates and make a selection. But at the time that Banner is reported to have made that statement, the previous HC and GM were still employed by the team.
You're making silly assumptions. I don't think that any particular candidate(s) were in mind when the statement was made. And you'll note that Banner has made no subsequent comment of denial about making the comment about McCoy being in the next coach's plans.
And I have made no such statements as fact. I've just been expressing my own opinions about why the former regime are no longer employed by the Browns (but I think it was a fait accompli as soon as Haslam officially owned the team) and about what I think the future of Brandon Weeden is with the Browns. I think his tenure here will be short-lived.
Quote:
It's all speculation and I have made that point quite clear. The indicators I have is that Chud said he wanted a vertical attack.
And why do you think that McCoy doesn't fit into that plan? I showed you the statistical proof that McCoy is as good (if not better) throwing the ball down the field than Weeden is. My own eyes indicate it too. If you take 'vertical attack' or 'vertical offense' to mean that passes are going to be thrown 35 or 40 yards down the field consistently, then you need to re-evaluate what you know about football.
Quote:
That would indicate a QB who has a fairly strong arm. If they do not acquire another QB with a strong arm, I believe they would require a QB with very good accuracy and decision making like an Alex Smith.
It doesn't require a fairly strong arm. And nearly every QB coming out of college and who is in the NFL today can throw the ball the required distance for a vertical offense, including Colt McCoy and Alex Smith. Now, if you're going to throw 70 yard Hail Mary passes all the time, then maybe Brandon Weeden is your guy.
Quote:
I don't see either of those things in Colt. Is it possible that Colt will still be here next year? At this point, anything is possible. I just try to look at the comments made and look at the skill set, or lack there of as the case may be and go from there.
You don't see them and I do and the statistical analysis backs up my view. Who's comments are you taking? Those of the posters on this board or elsewhere or those made by people with actual decision-making powers within the organization?
Of course, that's not to say that because people in the organization haven't made a comment one way or another that they aren't formulating decisions about certain people on the roster or in the coaching structure of the team.
Quote:
To me, Thad represents the skill set to go vertical much more than Colt does. And I really don't see them sending Weeden packing because he has a much stronger arm than Colt with which to go vertical.
I've already stated that every NFL QB on a roster can make the throws necessary in such an offensive scheme. The question becomes how efficiently they can execute that scheme. And it's obvious from your comments that your definition of the vertical offense is the Madden video game version. 
Quote:
So unlike you, I'm not going to sit here and say who will and won't be on the roster next year at the QB position, but I will look at what Chud said he wanted to implement and see who best fits that plan that we currently have on our roster.
Carry on......
I'm not saying who is going to be on the roster. I'm only expressing my views about what I think will occur. You accuse me of making unfounded statements and then make unfounded statements. Brilliant!
Educate yourself about the 'vertical offense' first and don't pay attention to the video game version.
And with that, my novel of a response comes to an close.
The End

|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Quote:
The correct question is who is Banner targeting. Sorry but Heckert and his drafting creating one of the youngest teams in the league days are gone. Let me know when we get an actual GM and then we can talk about if that said GM is even close to Heckert. We wont know if the Gm is good for 3 years.
Glad your so happy about it. 
.
It will come out quickly who they are after..and it won't take 3 years to know if the guy is any good...I have watched the draft for too long to know most of the time you see the results of good drafting very early and poor drafting soon enough..even though rookies need 3 years to show all their stuff it doesn't take me too long to see it..pretty much if I get that pit in my gut after a Browns draft..it's not good.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,543 Likes: 987
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,543 Likes: 987 |
I agree.
If it's good it may take 2-3 years before you finally know how good, but if it is bad it usually doesn't take long to tell and the chances for any real improvement out of the player are rare.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030 |
That is still a generalization Peen. A guy like Crabtree looked like an absolute bust until this year, and now he's an absolute stud.
I do agree with you overall, but some positions take longer to develop......aka WR,QB,etc. However, if a guy is not showing real signs of turning the corner by the end of his rookie year and he plays on the OL or front 7 then yeah it don't look good...lol.
As far as Chud, I'm ecstatic. I was afraid the J&J wouldn't give him a real look because of wanting a name, but they proved me wrong........could be a very good hire, and I like him more than anyone we interviewed. I would prefer we stay with the 43, but I'll wait to see what the plans are before I say anything about a 34 switch..........just want it to be attacking and not a gap filler. It will be interesting who we pair with Chud as a GM. I really hope we get a strong personnel guy as Chud has very little known experience in player evaluation. Has Gamble been hired yet??
Attack, agree with you about Moore. He's my number one target no matter which D we run.
Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456 |
Another problem is our whole scouting staff was assembled and directed by Heckert. They worked under the system he set up for evaluations etc so the new GM will be using that system his 1st year. Then he will assemble his staff and give it the direction for future years. Thats when we can start to get a real feel of how good a GM the new guy is.
Im hoping that Banner finds an A+++ GM now. I think Chud will have some say in the draft room but not like a Cowher or Gruden would have wanted. Im personally more comfortable with that style of system.
If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,543 Likes: 987
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,543 Likes: 987 |
Quote:
That is still a generalization Peen. A guy like Crabtree looked like an absolute bust until this year, and now he's an absolute stud.
I do agree with you overall, but some positions take longer to develop......aka WR,QB,etc. However, if a guy is not showing real signs of turning the corner by the end of his rookie year and he plays on the OL or front 7 then yeah it don't look good...lol.
As far as Chud, I'm ecstatic. I was afraid the J&J wouldn't give him a real look because of wanting a name, but they proved me wrong........could be a very good hire, and I like him more than anyone we interviewed. I would prefer we stay with the 43, but I'll wait to see what the plans are before I say anything about a 34 switch..........just want it to be attacking and not a gap filler. It will be interesting who we pair with Chud as a GM. I really hope we get a strong personnel guy as Chud has very little known experience in player evaluation. Has Gamble been hired yet??
Attack, agree with you about Moore. He's my number one target no matter which D we run.
No doubt it is a general comment. It's hard to be specific on something like that.
But in the end, you agree, and I respect your opinion on things, so.....good 
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Well well welllllll....U like Chud...and U were bummed about Duckman..errrr Kelly...good..I'm still shocked a bit..I thought Zimmer or Trestman were the favorites..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030 |
Let me clarify.........I was never bummed out about not getting Kelly as a candidate (as I've said I didn't care for him because of the lack of experience, gimmick O, etc). What I was upset about was the Browns FO seemingly dropping the ball again. I'm sick of losing bud.......I mean to the point I am getting disinterested in the team, and you know that isn't me...lol.
They rebounded well though, and came back with a guy I really like. If they will give him time I think he can win here, but a lot of it will depend on who they bring in to support him as GM. Chud has never (to my knowledge at least) been a key component in the evaluation of talent before, and is going to need a strong evaluator....or at least it appears that way. If we stick him with a goof like Lombardi then you will see me go back into hibernation.....lol.
Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024 Likes: 445
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024 Likes: 445 |
Quote:
Can't relay the amount of excitement I have over the Chud hire though.. I JUST know that THIS time it WILL finally be better.. Not because it can't get worse but because he is surrounding himself with proven winners and we were lucky that Heckert didn't leave us with an empty cupboard...
Interesting comment since Holmgren, Chilly, and Jauron were also all proven winners.
I'm not quoting you to be contrarian. I actually really like the Chud hire. But comments like the one you made make me smirk a little. Comments like that are good for message boards and fluff pieces in the paper.
The truth is only time will tell.
But no matter what happens, I want Chud to get at least 5 years. If the next year sucks, he gets year 2. Year 2 sucks, he gets 3, etc. I'm really tired of starting over again and again and again.
LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 601
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 601 |
Understand where you are coming from but as I am sure you can remember.. I was the "Debbie downer" with the ushering in of Shurmer and his staff.. Wasn't that I was a Mangini humper but I DEFINITELY was NOT in favor of him being fired only to be replaced by incompetence.. ANYWAYS.. ENOUGH of my "hindsight." Optimistic to finally anticipate better days.. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,543 Likes: 987
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,543 Likes: 987 |
Quote:
Understand where you are coming from but as I am sure you can remember.. I was the "Debbie downer" with the ushering in of Shurmer and his staff.. Wasn't that I was a Mangini humper but I DEFINITELY was NOT in favor of him being fired only to be replaced by incompetence..
ANYWAYS.. ENOUGH of my "hindsight." Optimistic to finally anticipate better days..
I agree. I do think we got it right with Chud.
Between him, the coaches he will attract, and our young, upcoming roster. I think we will win some games next year.
Maybe enough to be drafting say 18-22.
That's improvement.
I think we come in 2nd behind the Bengals, with a shot at the wildcard heading in to the last game of the season.
I know lately I have been dumping my late season games or giving them away. Next year, especially if the last game is a home game, I am holding those seats for me and whoever I choose is going to sit there. It might actually be a game of meaning.
We haven't had one of those since we beat the Falcons in whatever year that was.....Run William, Run.
Plus, I want a chance to wear some of the winter gear I bought with Cleveland in mind. It's rare I can wear it here unless I want to look like a goof. I have $200 boots I have worn maybe 5-6 times. Now I am afraid they may look old and out of date. 
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,193 Likes: 312
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,193 Likes: 312 |
Quote:
Between him, the coaches he will attract,
What coaches has he brought here so far ? Either he's waiting until after the SB to go get some or coaches still aren't attracted to Cleveland...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501 |
Norv is coming, but is on vacation with his family so they haven't announced it yet.
He is the only one we know that is for sure coming.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363 |
Quote:
Quote:
Between him, the coaches he will attract,
What coaches has he brought here so far ? Either he's waiting until after the SB to go get some or coaches still aren't attracted to Cleveland...
I think the way Banner and Haslam have handled things to this point,it is safe to say that noone actually knows what they have or have not done. I have still not seen anything official about Turner, just heresay. IMO, they are going to put the staff together and announce it all at once. I believe their next announcement will be the GM.
I know we are dying to know who the staff will be, but I doubt highly that since the playoffs are not even over yet, that the FO sees no reason to hurry up with announcing anything. It really serves no use to them, it is just for impatient fans like myself.
In due time, we'll know everything.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501 |
Quote:
The Plain Dealer first reported that the Browns have settled on Norv Turner as offensive coordinator. The team will announce the move once Turner returns from vacation. ESPN's Chris Mortensen later confirmed that Turner will be hired, via sources.
Link
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363 |
Thank you kind sir 
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,193 Likes: 312
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,193 Likes: 312 |
That"s why, I didn't know that.. I was wondering what the heck was going on with that..
The Coaches / cord thread was getting a little irritating for me, speculation talk on position coaches when there was no definite hiring or firing of the DC & OC...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,549 Likes: 11
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,549 Likes: 11 |
Keeping Warhop and the special teams coach is big news but there has been a new hire. Hope we start hearing about the D side soon. That is the side I am worried about. Chudzinski ally from Hurricane days to join Browns By Steve Doerschuk The card is beginning to fill up. We are told Brad Roll, 54, is likely to be announced as Rob Chudzinski’s strength and conditioning coach. Good luck to Kent Johnston, a long-timer in the business who worked in that post for the Browns the last three years. Roll was at USC this past season and has been an NFL strength coach in 19 seasons, mostly recently for Hue Jackson in Oakland. He was the strength coach for the Miami Hurricanes during part of Rob Chudzinski’s playing career there. web page
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,543 Likes: 987
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,543 Likes: 987 |
Quote:
Quote:
Between him, the coaches he will attract,
What coaches has he brought here so far ? Either he's waiting until after the SB to go get some or coaches still aren't attracted to Cleveland...
See....we just hired a strength coach! 
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Chud Continued
|
|