|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Sounds right to me. There's no award for getting the "best" player at a position. We need a good number 2 corner to complement Haden. Milliner isn't the only good one. Having Trufant/Rhodes and an extra second to pick up a really good player (could be Okafor, Elam, Kelce, Brown, Woods) would offer more value to the team than just Milliner.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
Quote:
Sounds right to me. There's no award for getting the "best" player at a position. We need a good number 2 corner to complement Haden. Milliner isn't the only good one. Having Trufant/Rhodes and an extra second to pick up a really good player (could be Okafor, Elam, Kelce, Brown, Woods) would offer more value to the team than just Milliner.
Ok, I understand where your coming from and I would not have a heart attack if we do what you suggest, but with Milliner and Haden we could have arguably best set of CB'sin the NFL ... 
Last edited by PastorMarc; 04/11/13 02:23 PM.
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
We could also have one of the best CB tandems if we draft Rhodes. And we would also pick up more picks.
Another reason we should trade down if Milliner is on the board is because we could demand more from our trade partner because we don't have to trade the pick. If Milliner is gone we lose a little leverage.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 989
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 989 |
I disagree, If Milliner is gone, that means that one of the OT's is available or Geno Smith. I think we sit in a good spot to pick up a couple of picks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Quote:
Sounds right to me. There's no award for getting the "best" player at a position. We need a good number 2 corner to complement Haden. Milliner isn't the only good one. Having Trufant/Rhodes and an extra second to pick up a really good player (could be Okafor, Elam, Kelce, Brown, Woods) would offer more value to the team than just Milliner.
I'll say this again..Trufant may be the better coverage guy out there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
There is a chance that all three of those guys are available when we pick.
1. Joeckel/Fisher 2. Jordan 3. Floyd 4. Joeckel/Fisher 5. Ansah
That isn't that far fetched.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205 |
Alabama's Dee Milliner says he and Cleveland Brown Joe Haden would be great combination
By Mary Kay Cabot, The Plain Dealer April 11, 2013
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Alabama's Dee Milliner is confident he and Joe Haden will form the best cornerback tandem in the NFL if the Browns tab him with the No. 6 overall pick in the draft.
"I really think we can," Milliner said in a phone interview today. "Not to be cocky or anything, but I think we'd be two really dynamic players who could go out and do great things for this defense."
Can he think of another pair that'd top them?
"No, not right now, I don't think so," he said. "Oh man, that would be awesome. I think we'd make a great combo and we'd accomplish some great things together."
Milliner, the undisputed premier cornerback in this draft, had the thrill of meeting former first-rounder Haden on Monday when he paid a pre-draft visit to the Browns. The two sat down and chatted, and Milliner watched one of his film heroes come to life.
"I study the top cornerbacks in the league to see what techniques I can put into my arsenal," Milliner. "I've watched film of guys like Champ Bailey, Darrelle Revis, Patrick Peterson and Joe. Joe has great fundamentals and he's definitely going to be one of the great DBs in the game. I really enjoyed meeting him. I've played against him, but have never really gotten a chance to talk to him."
What would it mean to have the two roaming the defensive backfield together?
"I definitely think we'd be a playoff contender," Milliner said.
Haden isn't the only Browns star Milliner connected with during his visit and would love to play with. A selection by the Browns would mean a reunion with former Alabama teammate Trent Richardson, with whom Milliner won one of his two national championships.
"I spent a lot of time with Trent when I was in Cleveland," said Milliner. "He told me how great it is here and how much I'd love it. We talked about we talked about how great it would be to play on the same team again and lead another team to a championship."
Milliner (6-0, 201) laughed when told of Richardson's in-season remark that defensive backs often avoid tackling him because they "don't want any trouble."
"That's true," Milliner said. "He's like tackling a Mack truck. But going against Trent in practice is the main reason I became a more physical tackler. He's so big and strong, he prepared me really well for what I'll face in the NFL."
The Browns weren't able to conduct a private workout with Milliner because he underwent surgery March 12 to repair a torn labrum. But he's confident he'll be full-strength by training camp "or sometime in August at the latest. I'm working really hard to get back as fast as I can."
But Milliner, one of at least a half-dozen players the Browns are considering with their top pick, played so well last season and ran so fast at the NFL Combine that he's a sure top 10 pick -- and maybe top five -- even without the workouts. He blazed a 4.37 in the 40 -- second fastest among cornerbacks.
"I've run faster, and think I could've done better, but overall, I was happy with my time," he said.
According to STATS, Inc, opposing quarterbacks completed just 40.6 percent of their attempts against Milliner, and he yielded only two TDs in 69 targets. He's had only five interceptions the past two seasons, but tied for first in the country with 22 pass breakups in 2012.
"I think there will be plenty of opportunities for interceptions in the NFL," he said. "Especially if Joe and I are on the field together."
ESPN Sports Science also studied Milliner and rated him off the charts athletically. He ranked in the 92nd percentile of athletes they've studied, which put him between Pro Bowlers Patrick Peterson and Antonio Cromartie. His acceleration topped that of Adrian Peterson his change of direction matched Cromartie's. His 41-inch vertical leap and his ability to cover the out-route ranked among the best ever.
"I was really happy with how all of that came out," he said. "Whether or not it helped my draft status, you never know."
Not only does Milliner consider himself the best defensive back in the draft, he also feels worthy of the No. 1 overall pick. Of the last 10 drafts, only two cornerbacks have gone in the top five: Peterson in 2011 and Terence Newman 2003.
"I think I could be (worth the No. 1 overall)," he said. "I bring a lot to the table, the way I go about preparing and making plays, the physical style I play. A team wouldn't be sorry."
NFL Network's Mike Mayock has become more impressed with Milliner throughout the pre-draft process.
"What I see on tape is a tough instinctive guy who tackles, which I love," Mayock said. "I love a corner that will tackle. When you come out of Nick Saban's Alabama program, especially when you're a defensive back which Nick takes a big interest in as a former defensive back coach, you are well-coached. He understands zone concepts, he plays man-to-man, he presses, he tackles."
Saban also has a good relationship with Browns GM Mike Lombardi, and will give him a thorough appraisal. Question is, will the Browns Roll 'Tide again come April 25th?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620 |
Quote:
Alabama's Dee Milliner says he and Cleveland Brown Joe Haden would be great combination
This is a lie. No top talent would ever come to Cleveland.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620 |
Quote:
Sounds right to me. There's no award for getting the "best" player at a position.
Well said.
That thinking is what scares me into thinking we might end up with Geno. The whole "the biggest mistake a new regime can make is not getting their own QB" rationale.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960 |
Quote:
Quote:
That is not true. If he is there we still have to consider trading down.
If Milliner is NOT a no brainer if avalable @ #6 then are you suggesting we bybass the drafts top CB to pick up a 2nd Rd. pick and then take who? Rhodes? Just wondering ...
I've read a little on both guys,, not a guru but it appears the biggest difference is that Rhodes is a bit slower than Milliner but has better overall skills on coverage.
So I don't know but it seems to be that it isn't a major drop.
So yeah,, based on the little I know, that sounds like a plan.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,229
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,229 |
this is good for other Free Agents to see:
"I spent a lot of time with Trent when I was in Cleveland," said Milliner. "He told me how great it is here and how much I'd love it. We talked about we talked about how great it would be to play on the same team again and lead another team to a championship."
the funny part is I still can't figure out if the "we talked about" was supposed to be in there twice or if it was not
Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960 |
Quote:
this is good for other Free Agents to see:
"I spent a lot of time with Trent when I was in Cleveland," said Milliner. "He told me how great it is here and how much I'd love it. We talked about we talked about how great it would be to play on the same team again and lead another team to a championship."
the funny part is I still can't figure out if the "we talked about" was supposed to be in there twice or if it was not
Not really sure it matters, but did you ever start to say something, stop, then repeat it and then complete the thought? I have.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205 |
I think the move towards online publishing has resulted in less (or worse) copy editing ... I notice lots more errors in internet news reporting than in the days of print news.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
Nice interview...I'm curious what is written after other visits he has with other teams. Is it the same excitement - is he just a good diplomat?
I am pretty sure we are targeting 2 players at #6. Millner n Ansah. Hope we get one of our guys!
JMHO
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563 |
If that's the case, and it certainly seems to be, then you go with Millner. Millner is faster, the same build, and has more room to grow.
I love Millner, and I love his attitude on everything. He and Joe Haden would be the perfect fit in the defensive back field and we could match up fairly easily with other teams.
you had a good run Hank.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Quote:
"I spent a lot of time with Trent when I was in Cleveland," said Milliner. "He told me how great it is here and how much I'd love it. "
Just don't invite anyone from Maple Heights over.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060 |
Eagles cancel visit with Dee Milliner The Eagles have the fourth overall pick and they have visited with plenty of the players expected to go early in the first round of the draft, but they won’t be meeting with the man considered to be the best cornerback in this year’s class. Alabama cornerback Dee Milliner told Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Eagles cancelled a scheduled visit this week. The Eagles have signed Cary Williams and Bradley Fletcher to help replace the departed Nnamdi Asomugha and Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, but they are expected to make some further additions to the unit via the draft. Canceling Milliner’s visit could be seen as a sign that he won’t be one of those additions, especially with the Eagles spending lots of time talking to offensive and defensive linemen recently. Of course, one can only take so much at face value in the silly season that leads up to the draft so the cancellation could also be regarded as a smokescreen designed to keep others from learning of any Philly interest in Milliner’s services. Milliner has met with plenty of other teams picking in the top 10 and he’s expected to be off the board early in the first day whether or not the Eagles are the team picking him. (link)
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111 |
So they're taking him then... 
Crowded elevators smell different to short people...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
So is Chip Kelly going to go for two after his first draft pick?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234 |
PFT Report: League personnel think Milliner reports part of “smear campaign” to lower draft stock Posted by Curtis Crabtree April 23, 2013, 12:17 AM EDT ‘Tis the season for misinformation with the NFL draft just three days away and Alabama cornerback Dee Milliner could be the latest prospect to find himself in the crosshairs. A report came out Monday saying that Milliner may not be ready for the start of training camp as he continues to recover from a surgery to his labrum following the NFL combine. If true, it’s increasingly more likely that Milliner, considered the top defensive back in the draft, could slip during the first round on Thursday night. However, the validity of that information may be tough to determine this close to the draft. In fact, those around the NFL are already questioning it. “Teams have known about these surgeries all along,” a source told Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer. “They haven’t been a secret and this is not a big issue.” Per Cabot, those she has talked to believe the negative reports are part of a smear campaign against Milliner in hopes of dropping his draft stock. A team hopeful to snag Milliner later in the draft could be pushing the narrative of his recovery not going to plan in hopes teams would shy away at the last-minute. However, with all the medical checks prospects undergo during the lead up to the draft – Milliner was evaluated again by league personnel at the combine re-check just three weeks ago – teams should feel very comfortable about their evaluation of his medicals. It would be a surprise to see his stock slide considerably at this stage in the process.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
I had Rhodes ahead of Millner anyway but that is a lot of injuries for a guy playing in Bama's secondary. I can understand if it was Vandy's corner having to make all the tackles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
The 49ers appearing to want to move up to take Milliner..interesting..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556 |
49ers and Browns trade rumors have been brewing since the owners meetings. not sure what kind of relationship is there between the 2 regimes but they did just finish the Colt trade and we all know teams often start big trades by completing minor ones first.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 742
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 742 |
49ers have like 13 picks and only a few holes. Even with prac squad, they'll have a hard time keeping all of their draft picks. If they don't trade up to get a guy like Milliner, watch for them to trade out for future picks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
I know Harbaugh and Lombardi are buddies.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060 |
Quote:
I know Harbaugh and Lombardi are buddies.
Yeah, I've read this somewhere too. Also, Lombardi interviewed there a couple seasons back for the GM job. Maybe he knew people currently in the FO/ownership world as well.
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060 |
Quote:
49ers have like 13 picks and only a few holes. Even with prac squad, they'll have a hard time keeping all of their draft picks. If they don't trade up to get a guy like Milliner, watch for them to trade out for future picks.
I don't think there is any way the 49ers make 13 draft selections. It's like the Cavaliers having 5 draft picks in two rounds with a 12 person roster. It just won't happen. The fact the 49ers have little holes to fill (like you mentioned, Don) makes you think they'll try and target a guy they like. I think it may be a WR in the mid-teens if they want to move up. Patterson maybe? Just a guess.
Not sure SF Fran will make a move all the way up to 6. I'd think that would include a future 1st rounder among their first two picks this year (31 & 34).... Maybe that's excessive but moving from 31 ALL THE WAY to 6 pays a steep price. Precedence in the 2011 CLE-ATL trade is there as a baseline for negotiations. But the jump San Fran would make is larger.
Last edited by MemphisBrownie; 04/23/13 02:10 PM.
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Using the old value chart, #6 (1,600) for #31 (600), #34 (560), #61 (292) and #93 (128) is about right (1580 vs 1600).
Not sure any corner is worth giving up 4 top-100 picks for, though.
There's no question I'd take that deal if I'm the Browns. I'd also accept taking their 2014 2nd in lieu of #61.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Well, they've already got Asamonga on the team.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620 |
Quote:
Quote:
49ers have like 13 picks and only a few holes. Even with prac squad, they'll have a hard time keeping all of their draft picks. If they don't trade up to get a guy like Milliner, watch for them to trade out for future picks.
I don't think there is any way the 49ers make 13 draft selections. It's like the Cavaliers having 5 draft picks in two rounds with a 12 person roster. It just won't happen. The fact the 49ers have little holes to fill (like you mentioned, Don) makes you think they'll try and target a guy they like. I think it may be a WR in the mid-teens if they want to move up. Patterson maybe? Just a guess.
Not sure SF Fran will make a move all the way up to 6. I'd think that would include a future 1st rounder among their first two picks this year (31 & 34).... Maybe that's excessive but moving from 31 ALL THE WAY to 6 pays a steep price. Precedence in the 2011 CLE-ATL trade is there as a baseline for negotiations. But the jump San Fran would make is larger.
Moving up that far ... next year's 1st is not too steep of a price. From the bottom of the 1st to #6 ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060 |
Quote:
Using the old value chart, #6 (1,600) for #31 (600), #34 (560), #61 (292) and #93 (128) is about right (1580 vs 1600).
Not sure any corner is worth giving up 4 top-100 picks for, though.
There's no question I'd take that deal if I'm the Browns. I'd also accept taking their 2014 2nd in lieu of #61.
I wouldn't. There'd need to be a 2014 1st rounder in there. They can keep the #61. and #93. Again, as a baseline in 2011.
Browns got #27, #59, #123 in 2011; unknown first rounder and fourth in 2012. Falcons got #7.
Considering 49ers are coming from 4 spots further back than ATL and a pick one spot earlier than Cleveland's in 2011, there has to be at least SF first-rounder next year. Granted, the second round pick compensation would be better than that in 2011, I'd eliminate the third and fourth rounders you suggested.
#6 for #31, #34, and unknown first rounder (probably a late-rounder). Honestly, I'm not sure that is fair enough compensation. I also don't go strictly off Johnson's point value scale more so similar, most recent trade transactions. JMO.
Last edited by MemphisBrownie; 04/23/13 03:15 PM.
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Remember, this is a late 1st, an early 2nd, a late 2nd, and a late 3rd compared to the ATL deal which was a late 1st, a late 2nd, a late 4th, and the next-year picks.
A more-equivalent deal would be
31, 61, 128, 2014 1st, 2014 4th
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234 |
LINK Dee Milliner has had five surgeries Posted by Michael David Smith April 23, 2013, 2:19 PM EDT Whether there are legitimate concerns about Dee Milliner’s ability to stay healthy or whether it’s all part of a smear campaign, the health of the former Alabama cornerback is one of the major topics of conversation in the final days before the NFL draft. So with everyone buzzing about Milliner’s medical status, Adam Schefter of ESPN offers this note: Milliner has undergone a total of five surgeries: a right knee scope, a repair of a sports hernia, a procedure for a right tibia stress fracture and one surgery on each shoulder. Milliner is still rehabbing after his most recent shoulder surgery, and he might not be ready for the start of training camp. So it’s easy to see why there are medical questions about him. But it’s also important to remember this: In his three seasons at Alabama, Milliner missed exactly one game, and in that game (a blowout win over Western Kentucky), coach Nick Saban said Milliner had a minor hip injury and could have played if the team needed him. So while Milliner’s medical history may raise a few eyebrows, his football history says he can get on the field when his team needs him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370 |
Quote:
Quote:
Using the old value chart, #6 (1,600) for #31 (600), #34 (560), #61 (292) and #93 (128) is about right (1580 vs 1600).
Not sure any corner is worth giving up 4 top-100 picks for, though.
There's no question I'd take that deal if I'm the Browns. I'd also accept taking their 2014 2nd in lieu of #61.
I wouldn't. There'd need to be a 2014 1st rounder in there. They can keep the #61. and #93. Again, as a baseline in 2011.
Browns got #27, #59, #123 in 2011; unknown first rounder and fourth in 2012. Falcons got #7.
Considering 49ers are coming from 4 spots further back than ATL and a pick one spot earlier than Cleveland's in 2011, there has to be at least SF first-rounder next year. Granted, the second round pick compensation would be better than that in 2011, I'd eliminate the third and fourth rounders you suggested.
#6 for #31, #34, and unknown first rounder (probably a late-rounder). Honestly, I'm not sure that is fair enough compensation. I also don't go strictly off Johnson's point value scale more so similar, most recent trade transactions. JMO.
I think that for SF to move up to #6 from #31, it would require their #34 (from KC) their #1 next year and the #2 (acquired from KC) or their own #2 (which would be higher than KCs #3) in the event that the conditions weren't meant to move the pick that KC gave up next year from the 3rd to the 2nd round in 2014.
That's what I think SF would have to give up to move up that far. I don't think they'd be willing to move up that far for someone that would probably be there in the middle of the round. As a Browns fan, I would love it but I wouldn't expect it.
I wouldn't be upset with the Browns having two 1st and two 2nd rounders next year.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 742
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 742 |
Quote:
NFL.com says 49ers might be interested in Tavon Austin or Star Lottamonga ...
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000...up-in-nfl-draft
I was thinking Eiffert could be a target. Him and Vernon Davis could be the West Coast version of Gronk and Hernandez.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060 |
Quote:
Remember, this is a late 1st, an early 2nd, a late 2nd, and a late 3rd compared to the ATL deal which was a late 1st, a late 2nd, a late 4th, and the next-year picks.
A more-equivalent deal would be
31, 61, 128, 2014 1st, 2014 4th
Perhaps that's another consideration. For me, the barrier of entry to even enter into conversations about a move that far is a first rounder next year. From there, their 2013 first round pick and second rounders enter into the conversation. Maybe it's that late second-rounder you mentioned plus others, but the deal begins and ends with the 2014 first round pick.
It's a further move up than in 2011 for one slot higher. If San Fran fell in love with someone that high, I'd make sure they pay for it. That's essentially a top 5 draft pick.
If we played with the draft value chart on my recommendation, it's tough to gauge what the 2014 first rounder would be, but it's safe to say in would be near where they are now....So,
#6= 1600
FOR
#31, #34= 1160 + 2014 first rounder (Avg. score of 25-32) = 650
So, 1600 vs 1810. Is the difference of 210 "points" essentially the 74th pick gonna stop you for pulling the trigger on a player to take you over the proverbial hump? Because if you want to move up that far, I think that is the reason why. So is the juice worth the squeeze?
As a point of reference, the Falcons ended that trade in 2011 giving up 1855 "value points" vs one pick value at 1500. Atlanta likes Julio Jones. I'd think they'd say the juice was worth the squeeze particularly with a franchise QB.
Last edited by MemphisBrownie; 04/23/13 03:51 PM.
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 742
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 742 |
I like the draft chart and I think its a valuable tool. But like any market, supply and demand sets the tone. Last year, big demand for RG3, only one supplier (Rams).
Seems like there will only be a few teams with mild interest in trading up, and that depends on the board (Milliner and Left Tackle). Plus, it seems like 1/2 of the top 15 are willing to trade out. It appears we've got a supply of trade-down candidates and very little demand.
Banner is going to look at that chart, and probably have to choose between staying at #6 and accepting a trade with poor value.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060 |
Quote:
Banner is going to look at that chart, and probably have to choose between staying at #6 and accepting a trade with poor value.
It could possibly end up that way, but there may be very high demand at 6 if one of the really good OTs is left when we pick. Much like the Rams being the only team last year, Cleveland may be that possible supplier to some teams this year. Now the price obviously won't be as high but for a few teams looking/needing an LT- Dolphins, Chargers, and maybe others, if only one remains (projecting Lane Johnson to be there) there could be a chance to move down and gain a decent trade.
The wild card here is the Chargers. Their line was pretty bad and could stay put and still pick up a guard if necessary, like Womack, Cooper and still consider it a win. Who knows, they could like Fluker as well. If Miami gambles on that notion, there may not be much movement at all.
It will all come down to the movement of the left tackles in the early part if the Browns really want to move down a few slots. If there gone or trades happen before them, I expect them to stay put. Like the aforementioned SF trade talks, I don't expect that to take place.
JMO.
Last edited by MemphisBrownie; 04/23/13 04:16 PM.
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2013 NFL Season NFL Draft (2013) Millner
|
|