DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns Division Record Since 1990

no Oakland?

Alright so I broke down and did the math myself. Overall from 1990-2012, the browns are 40 and 94 with a win percentage of 29.85%.


Year Wins Loss
2012 2 4
2011 0 6
2010 1 5
2009 1 5
2008 1 5
2007 3 3
2006 0 6
2005 1 5
2004 2 4
2003 2 4
2002 3 3
2001 5 5
2000 2 8
1999 1 9
1998 - -
1997 - -
1996 - -
1995 3 5
1994 4 2
1993 3 3
1992 3 3
1991 2 4
1990 1 5
Total 40 94

If you look at it from 1999-2012, we are 24 W and 72 L, with a win percentage of 25%.

From 1990-1995, we are 16 and 22 with 16 W and 22 L for a win percentage of 42.11%.

We have been over .500 once within the division since 1990, that being in 1994.

So the point of this topic is to what? Show that the Browns have not been successful since 1990 because they haven't compete in our division?

Well thanks, I'm so glad that is cleared up. I would have never figured that out with out this topic.

I don't understand why everyone is so butt hurt by facts. The thread was made to show statistically how terrible we have been. It was also meant to facilitate that we've clearly been doing something wrong. It is inexcusable to be this bad for this long. I think a lot of people realize we've been bad, but not as bad as it's actually been.

Because we already know this. It's pretty common knowledge that we have been bad and the reasons why. We don't need a thread to tell us this. So either you are a troll and are on here just to talk about how bad the Browns are to throw it in our face or you are a person that feels the need to break down and talk about why 1 + 1 = 2.

you have posted 4 times on this board. all in this thread. all about how terribly terrible the Browns have been (and decided to go back even further than the standard 1999 reboot).

everyone knows how terrible we have been. we have discussed ad nauseum about how poor division records reflect the uphill climb we will have to make. we have had threads that demonstrate the poor division record coach-by-coach. but, we all also post about other things as well.

wait a minute...

You mean we have been bad since 1999?

Damn I thought we had been a play off team every year.

Time to crawl out from underneath that rock... thanks Kirby it's an epiphany

Quote:

---

So either you are a troll...

---

He posts like a visiting benglas fan. I've seen a lot of them over the years here. He fits the M.O.

Hey.......where is Dj, mac, and Pit on this thread?

You know, the guys who are crying their eyes out about how worried and concerned they are because we have changed regimes.

Yeah, it could get a lot, lot worse. Instead of winning 4 and 5 games like we did under The Big Show and Reach Heckert, we might win 3 or 4 games.

The horror!

Here is my take: Thank God those guys are gone!!! At least we now have some hope. I don't know if the new regime is any good or not, but goodness, they can't be any worse than the trash we just threw out!

Maybe Kendall learned how to type?

Yeah Pit, it's me who is worried about people agreeing w/my views.

You guys can't handle an opposing opinion. I've already been warned not to challenge Dj. Y'all can make up things and misrepresent the truth, but it's okay, because most people agree w/that line of thinking.

Don't dare mess w/the majority opinion.

Just for the record: again Vers "talking football", go figure. Posters here aren't as dumb, they're going to figure out who keeps starting the fire.

"Majority opinion"...that's a first for me. Anyway, whatever the % of people agreement has to do with the strength of an argument is beyond me, but the fun part in all of this is that the actual "majority" is deep into Banner and forgot everything they've said about Banner&Lombardi when it was rumored they could be our "talent evaluators". I don't remember anyone wanting that and now they're magically all like "ok" with it. Doesn't get more "homer" and "majority" thinking than that, no? And pretty spineless on top of that, but that's just aesthetics I guess. According to your own made up rule of not messing with majority opinion, I shouldn't even be responding to you as YOU actually represent the majority here, lol

Maybe you were warned to challenge me because you have to come up with good arguments once your bully rah-rah has been dismissed....now go cry "contempt" an "blasphemy" off of your soapbox

Speaking strictly for myself, I was neutral on Banner, and hated the Lombardi hiring ....... however, at this point he is the GM, and there is nothing we can do about it. I merely hope that he turns out to be the right guy.

I also happen to like many of the moves that we have made so far this off-season. We cannot sign everyone. I love the Bryant signing. I like the Kruger signing. I almost love the groves signing, because he can be an important backup/situational guy, is experienced in Horton's defense, and he was inexpensive.

I am not crazy about the fact that we didn't make more of a move to shore up the 2nd starting spot in the defensive backfield, but that just tells me that we will probably address it in the draft.

I don't love every move they have made, and I don't love that they passed on some players I would have pursued, (like Huff) however, I haven't agreed with any front office 100% yet, and I don't expect that I will do so anything soon. What I do know is that we have won 4 or 5 games in each of the last 4 seasons ...... and that's unacceptable to me. Hopefully Banner and Lombardi manage to get it right, and we succeed, I want them to build a winner. If not, then they will be gone, and we'll have to start over again ....... which would suck.

You can communicate with many friends, maybe you can find the best answer


__________________
The good life on their own to create

buy wow gold