Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#800394 07/21/13 06:06 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
B
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
web page


CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Browns CEO Joe Banner was hired by Jimmy Haslam on October 16, 2012, to be in charge of the daily operations of the franchise, both football and business. He started with the Philadelphia Eagles in 1994, and his expertise was business and the salary cap. He was promoted to vice president in 1997, and then to team president in 2001.

Banner left the Eagles in 2012, and soon was helping Haslam purchase the Browns from Randy Lerner. In the last week before camp opens, Banner spoke for more than an hour on the state of the franchise. He inherits a team that has a 23-57 record over the last five years, with one playoff appearance since returning in 1999.

On taking over ...

Q: Why did you want to run the Browns?

A: After leaving (the Eagles), I was looking for a real challenging situation. I met Jimmy [Haslam] in June [2012]. He was interested in owning an NFL team. We knew the Browns could be available. If we were going to do something together near-term, this is where we'd do it.

Q: Does all the losing worry you?

A: No. Nor does it scare me. That's because everything not right is fixable, and everything out of your control is very good.

Q: Please explain.

A: The things you can't control are so positive. The fan base is passionate. The market wants you to succeed so much. The media can create a lot of excitement if you are going well. If you do things right, you can attract coaches and players here. These things are not present in every NFL city.

Q: So why all the losing?

A: Look at what can be controlled: The quality of the team, from the front office to the coaches to the players. You have to pick the right people.

Q: How did you see the Browns when you were running the Philadelphia Eagles?

A: We viewed Cleveland as a totally untapped, phenomenal football market. The opportunity to do something special is here, but it seems no one has been able to seize it.

Q: Can you understand why fans would doubt that it will be any different now?

A: If I were a football fan here, that's what I'd be saying. I get it. Not only have these fans lost a lot of games, they lost their team for a while. They have been through so much.

Q: Why can that change?

A: If you look at teams that have made significant turnover in their front office and coaching staff, you know fairly quickly if they are on the right track. It's not too long that some of the wins start to come ... that's different than thinking you're on the right track, but the wins aren't starting to follow.

Q: So what will the record be this year?

A: I'm not going to get into that, but it shouldn't take very long for fans to see that things look different.

On making changes ...

horton-coach-def-brns-2013-jg.jpg
View full size
Joe Banner interviewed Ray Horton for the head coaching position before making him the defensive coordinator. He says Horton's attacking style reflects what the Browns want to be on both sides of the ball.
Joshua Gunter, The Plain Dealer

Q: Why did you replace virtually all the key people in the front office and coaching staff, except special teams coordinator Chris Tabor?

A: We didn't come into this expecting to make this many changes. But yes, we turned over the organization.

Q: But why?

A: We needed a determination, a relentless mindset that is more than just winning a game or two next season. We don't want to settle for just getting better, maybe making the playoffs.

Q: So what is the goal?

A: Some people are intimidated about setting the bar really high. We want to build a Super Bowl team. For some people, that's too much pressure. And some people may say, "You won five games, what are you talking about the Super Bowl for?"

On role models ...

Q: Why are you talking about the Super Bowl when you have not won more than five games in a season since 2007?

A: Because that is our ultimate goal. We've studied teams that made the Super Bowl. We need to play the style of game that they do.

Q: Like who?

A: You take the Packers, 49ers, Ravens and Pittsburgh. They have recently been to Super Bowls. Baltimore and Pittsburgh are in our division. They are consistent winners.

Q: Is that why you switched from a 4-3 to a 3-4 defense?

A: Most good teams play an attacking 3-4 defense. Every offensive coach we talked to in the off-season said the attacking 3-4 defense was the hardest to face, so that's what we need to play.

Q: And on offense?

A: You have to throw the ball downfield -- attack. Not all the time, but you have to be able to do it. That's how Chud (head coach Rob Chudzinski) and Norv (Turner, offensive coordinator) play the game.

Q: How will the changes show this season?

A: We will deliver a team that plays the style that winning teams play -- aggressive, attacking and smart.

Q: How many players do you think will be around when the team reaches what you call: "really good"?

A: When [coach] Andy Reid was hired in Philadelphia, we asked how many of our 22 starters would be good enough to play for us when we compete for a championship? The answer was 11. I think that's comparable here, but I'm not going to name them.

On GM Michael Lombardi ...


Cleveland Browns CEO Joe Banner chats with Terry Pluto - Part 1
One week before training camp begins for the Cleveland Browns, CEO Joe Banner sits down with Plain Dealer columnist Terry Pluto for an interview at their practice facility in Berea. This is the first of two videos from the interview. Part 2 will be posted Saturday evening with Pluto's story.
Q: Why hire Lombardi when you know he would not be a popular choice?

A: I have a 16-year relationship with him. I believe of the people available that I knew or people that may have become available, he gives us the best chance to win.

Q: But didn't you only work one year with him?

A: I ran a draft with him in Philly in 1998. We believe it's still one of the best drafts. (The Eagles picked four players who made Pro Bowls and traded for Hugh Douglas, another Pro Bowler.)

Q: When Reid was hired as coach (in 1999), why didn't Lombardi stay with the Eagles as player personnel director?

A: I was not the sole decision-maker at the time of who was going to hold that job. (Banner was vice president in 1999, not promoted to president until 2001.)

Q: So you stayed in touch with Lombardi?

A: Yes, I've talked with him about players and drafts. Absolutely, I knew he would not be a popular choice, and it would make me less popular.

Q: That didn't matter?

A: To a fault, I'm guilty of doing what I think is best to win ... and staying strong about it as to opposed to worrying about what is popular. You have to be prepared to make tough decisions, having the guts to stand up and make the decision.

On how the draft works ...

banner-lombardi.JPG
View full size
Joe Banner cited his comfort level with Mike Lombardi as one of the reasons the former Browns aide is now the team's general manager.
Scott Shaw, The Plain Dealer

Q: Who is drafting and picking the players?

A: Everyone successful in sports is good at collaborating, putting together a team of people who work together.

Q: Who is in the draft room?

A: It's Mike [Lombardi], [Player Personnel Director] Ray Farmer, Chud, Jimmy [Haslam] and myself. Jimmy is not grading players, but he wants to know about their character. He asks challenging questions. But it's the four of us [Lombardi, Farmer, Chudzinski and Banner] who make the decision.

Q: But someone has the final word, right?

A: Unambiguously, the answer is me. No matter if I'm making the decision or those we employ are making it, I'm accountable. I'm perfectly willing to take the blame. Hopefully, it goes well, and (everyone) gets some credit.

On draft day trades ...

Q: Were you expecting criticism for trading your fourth round and fifth round picks this season for picks next season?

A: I knew it needed to be explained, but I didn't think it would be viewed so negatively.

Q: OK, explain it.

A: We were in a weak draft in the fourth and fifth rounds. We had a chance to turn them into third- and fourth-round picks next season in a strong draft. ... That's a no-brainer.

Q: You really know the draft in those rounds will be stronger next year?

A: You don't know [positively], but you've done enough work to have an opinion. But even if it's a weak draft again, I'd rather have a third and fourth rounders in a weak draft than a fourth and fifth-rounder.

Q: But you traded a pick to the Steelers ...

A: And we're used to being out-smarted by the Steelers. I can understand why fans think that. But hopefully, that's not the case.

On making trades ...

Q: Why do you say that you must get an advantage in a trade?

A: If you don't think you're getting the better of it, then don't trade. If you make that the criteria -- getting the better of it -- then if you trade in or out of the division, it doesn't matter. It's still an extra plus.

Q: But if you're wrong ...

A: We're not pretending we get it 100 percent right, but I think we've already shown we've made some good trades.

Q: Like what?

A: We got draft picks for Colt McCoy (Browns traded McCoy and a sixth-round pick to the 49ers for a fifth- and seventh-round pick) when the league thought he'd get cut. That's the kind of move that good teams make.

Q: What else?

A: We picked up [veteran Miami receiver] Davone Bess without giving up anything that would hurt us [a fifth-rounder]. We signed him to an extension so he'll be with us when we get stronger. Picking up [running back] Dion Lewis [from Eagles] is a good move.

Q: So these moves reveal what?

A: People should start to see that other teams have made moves like these, but not the Browns. But that's changing.

On signing free agents ...

kruger-sacks-luck-2012-ravens-ap.jpg
View full size
Paul Kruger was the Browns' biggest free-agent signing, and Joe Banner he'll be a major part in an improved defense. But Banner also said free agency can't be the main course of improving a franchise.
AP file

Q: Why didn't you make a bigger impact in free agency?

A: We spent nearly $90 million on free agents, and more than half of that is guaranteed. That's a big change for this organization. We targeted [Paul] Kruger and [Desmond] Bryant. How many times has this organization gone 2-for-2 in free agency when at least six other teams wanted those players?

Q: Doesn't it just come down to money?

A: At this level, the offers are comparable. We were able to sell them on the coaches, the city and schemes we plan to run. This feels different to me [when it comes to the Browns].

Q: Kruger and Bryant are good defensive players, but are they game changers?

A: You rarely get a guy who fixes your team in free agency. You can get guys who can really help you, and we did that. We view free agency and the draft together, and because we got the guys we wanted in free agency, we could trade some of the draft picks for future picks.

Q: How do you see free agency?

A: Winning teams are built through the draft, and by retaining their best players. Some winning teams use free agency to an extent, others hardly use it. But you don't build a winner mostly through free agency.

On the coaching staff ...

Q: Why did you hire Rob Chudzinski, a rookie head coach?

A: Winning teams have aggressive head coaches. We didn't focus on a young coach, old coach, experienced coach or college coach. I wanted a strong leader who is passionate and intense and can put together a quality staff.

Q: Did you know that by hiring Chudzinski, you'd also add Norv Turner [offensive coordinator] and Ray Horton [defensive coordinator]?

A: We knew Chud could bring Norv along. We thought we could get Ray Horton. That staff with Chud replicates what winning teams do -- they have good coordinators on both sides of the ball.

Q: Did you interview Horton for head coach?

A: Yes, and he's very impressive. I'm more impressed with him now than when I first interviewed him. He is solid, even-keeled and determined. He relates to players ... it's outstanding!

Q: You first tried to hire Chip Kelly, but he went to Philadelphia -- your old team -- instead. Does that bother you?

A: I don't want to get into any of that. ... I choose to look forward and I really like our coaching staff.

On Haslam's legal problems ...

Cleveland Browns: Jimmy Haslam watches the activity at Browns minicamp Friday
View full size
Jimmy Haslam's legal issues are not a factor in how the Browns are being run, says Joe Banner, who added that the team is not for sale.
Thomas Ondrey, The Plain Dealer

Q: Do you understand why some fans are nervous about the FBI investigation in Haslam's Pilot Flying J?

A: I know why people would be unsettled by it. But at the same time, fans can trust what we said about it. Jimmy would tell you that he's disappointed by what happened. I think he has apologized to Tennessee [the company's home state] and to Cleveland.

Q: How does this impact the Browns?

A: As it relates to the day-to-day operation of running the Browns, it will be unaffected by it.

Q: Even though Haslam will have to pay millions in lawsuits and legal fees?

A: Nothing is going to happen that will alter that vision or affect our ability to run the franchise.

Q: Is the team for sale?

A: The team is not for sale. That's a totally legitimate question. It's why Jimmy answered it earlier [in a press conference] and why I'm doing the same now. Unambiguously, it's not for sale.

Q: Do you realize that a few months before Haslam bought the Browns, there were rumors that the team was for sale and the team put out a statement saying it was not for sale?

A: I just know that it's important for the public to be able to trust us, so that when moments [Haslam's legal issues] like this come up, we have a track record of being truthful.

On possible stadium renovations ...

Q: Are you really going to put $100 million into revamping the stadium?

A: We have hired a construction company and an architectural company. It's too early to know what we will do, or even what is possible to do. We don't know all the elements involved or what the cost will be.

Q: So it's research at this point?

A: We are waiting to find out what is possible, and that could take four to 12 weeks.

Q: Who will pay for the renovation?

A: Until we get the [reports] and know what is possible -- and what it costs -- I can't answer that question.

On Trent Richardson ...

Q: Can he be an impact player?

A: He has tremendous talent. He wants to be great. He is now in a system to do it. He's worked hard in the off-season and indications are encouraging.

Q: But he had injuries last season, and again in the mini-camps this year, right?

A: You don't like to see collective injuries. But they don't seem to be injuries that will necessarily repeat. We've put him on a new program of training, nutrition and even to help him sleep. But you are right, he has to get on the field -- so we'll wait and see.

On Brandon Weeden ...

weeden-prac-points-finger-2013-jg.jpg
View full size
Joe Banner praised Brandon Weeden's off-season work and reinforced the team's belief that the revamped offense should play more to his talents.
Joshua Gunter, The Plain Dealer

Q: What is your impression of your quarterback?

A: Everyone has been encouraged by how hard he has worked. He has made progress. We believe this system -- throwing from the shotgun and throwing more downfield -- is more likely to fit him.

Q: Do you think he can be a long-term answer at quarterback?

A: The first thing you ask is how he throws the ball? He throws it very well. We have to see how he does with the intangible aspects. If they all come together, there are a lot of possibilities. But we have to wait and see.

Q: If quarterback the most important position on the field, so why didn't you bring in someone else to start?

A: I'm going to give a broad answer, starting with our defense. We knew we had to change our defense. We had to get faster and get more pressure on the quarterback. We went out and got players to do that. We were ready to charge ahead on defense.

Q: But the quarterback ...

A: On offense, we want to see what develops before making big changes, other than the scheme. And the change on offense is just as big as from the 4-3 to the 3-4 on defense.

Q: Why didn't you change many of the players on offense?

A: It's hard to know their potential because so many of them -- not just Brandon -- are so young. Also, the coaches looked at Brandon and some of the others and saw enough there to want to see more. [The coaches'] input is very important on this.

On Josh Gordon ...

Q: What was your reaction when Gordon flunked the NFL drug test and was suspended for two games?

A: It's a concern. We're going to create an environment here where people are going to be held accountable and the expectations are going to be high.

Q: How does that apply to Gordon?

A: We want to give everyone a chance to succeed. We want to support him. He's a player with a chance to become a valuable part of this team.

Q: So what's the approach?

A: First, [the failed drug test] is a concern and disappointment. At the same time, we're doubling down and we've got to find a way to support and help him be what he can be as a player -- and help us be a better football team.

Q: Does he know this is a problem?

A: Yes, he gets it. Chud has said [Gordon] has done everything we've asked him to do. That's true. But it's early. He can't remove himself from this moment. He can't forget what happened.

On the Browns' future ...

Q: What is your biggest challenge?

A: Time. Our goal is to build a Super Bowl team. You know that going into 2013, you don't have everything you need to win a Super Bowl.

Q: So what drives you?

A: Every day, I hear from fans on how it would feel if the team got really good. I'm anxious to deliver that. Jimmy, Mike, Chud ... all of us want to make it happen. There is a great sense of urgency. We need to get there reasonably fast -- being really good -- but that will hard.

Q: Why can you make it happen?

A: I was involved in a turnaround situation in Philadelphia. You can look at many of our people, they have been with teams that had been losing and turned it around.

Q: What is your hope for the Browns?

A: I want a team where if it wins 10 games [but doesn't do well in the playoffs], fans are upset. I want to raise and re-align expectations so that people can talk about how our team can get really good and stay really good. I want to see what that would be like for the fans and this city, I want to feel that passion and intensity for the Browns when we really start to win. That will be something.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
For some reason, the video on Cleveland.com isn't working..

Thought it was interesting what he had to say about Horton. Banner didn't come off as the "evildoer" that some say he is. Actually seems sincere, not over committing but telling exactly what the goal is.

Not sure why he wouldn't say much on the whole Chip Kelly thing. But I guess it's yesterdays news anyway.

Says the teams not for sale. I understand those that believe otherwise, but honestly, I don't think it is. Hope I'm right.

I've softened on Banner as a result of these interviews. Still don't understand the Lombardi hire. But beyond that, I'll just wait and see.

Kinda senseless to nitpick every little thing the man does...

Last edited by Damanshot; 07/21/13 07:49 AM.

#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Q: What is your hope for the Browns?

A: I want a team where if it wins 10 games [but doesn't do well in the playoffs], fans are upset. I want to raise and re-align expectations so that people can talk about how our team can get really good and stay really good. I want to see what that would be like for the fans and this city, I want to feel that passion and intensity for the Browns when we really start to win. That will be something.


... the entire staff will be crowned by the fans if they start winning consistently. Crowned, worshiped and respected lol! It's an atomic bomb that's timer has been waiting and the explosion will be on an epic scale. Get it done Joe, we deserve it!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Out of all the bozos I like Pluto the best. Still he holds true the term Bozo:
Quote:

Q: Why did you replace virtually all the key people in the front office and coaching staff, except special teams coordinator Chris Tabor?




In Bozo fashion he forgot about OL Coach Warhop...unless he was fired n I did not see it???


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #800398 07/21/13 07:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Nope, George is still on the team!

eotab #800399 07/21/13 07:51 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Quote:

Out of all the bozos I like Pluto the best. Still he holds true the term Bozo:
Quote:

Q: Why did you replace virtually all the key people in the front office and coaching staff, except special teams coordinator Chris Tabor?




In Bozo fashion he forgot about OL Coach Warhop...unless he was fired n I did not see it???




Just cause I want to know, were there any mispellings? LOL seriously. Isn't that a little nitpicky Eo?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Quote:

LOL seriously. Isn't that a little nitpicky Eo?




Not at all...look Pluto and others have a job...in my eyes won of the best jobs around. He is not a blogger...he is a paid professional. It not like he is a national media guy. He should know our Browns inside n out just like each one of us. He did not make a general statement.

He was stating a "FACT"
Why did you replace virtually all the key people in the front office and coaching staff, except special teams coordinator Chris Tabor?

If I or anyone on here in pure football stated that as a FACT...within minutes there would be 10 knowledgeable fans correcting that statement...and we are not professionals.

picky...nah Would your boss be picky correcting you on your job. Pluto is one of my favorites but he still reminds me of why these guys are bozos...how do you not read that n know the Browns inside n out n say...ooops that ain't right. I didn't study it hard it slapped me in the face immediately. That tells me he didn't review n do his job correctly.

Remember this was a schedule interview...he had his questions prepared - well how does a Brown Expert miss that. lol What bothers me a bit is that Banner didn't correct him


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #800401 07/21/13 08:12 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Love ya man, but it's nitpicky.. no way around it.. those that are pros at their jobs still make a mistake from time to time.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
It's no secret that I thought H, H, and S were incompetent and were never going to lead us to the promised land. Admittingly, I was more happy than the average fan when Banner cleaned house. With that said, what's not to like about this guy?

He comes across as very smart. He is forthright w/his answers and if he doesn't want to talk about something, he comes right out and tells you that. I like that. Makes me think he is more truthful about the things he is saying. I also think that he is going to work his tail off to make sure we succeed, which is a far cry from The Big Show.

There are so many good things in that article, but this one seems to be the most important:

Quote:

I'm guilty of doing what I think is best to win ... and staying strong about it as to opposed to worrying about what is popular. You have to be prepared to make tough decisions, having the guts to stand up and make the decision.



It's not the first time he has alluded to that type of thinking. I think that having that philosophy is huge. I've said for years that we needed to find a sound philosophy and then have the fortitude to stick w/it through thick and thin and not be pressured by outside forces to abandon our philosophy. I think we finally have our man.

There were a lot of good things in that article. I don't think critiquing Pluto should be the topic of conversation. There are a plethora of quotes that warrant discussion. I think the quotes on Richardson, Weeden, and Gordon were very interesting----both in what was said and what was implied by obvious omissions.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:

Q: How do you see free agency?

A: Winning teams are built through the draft, and by retaining their best players.




jc...

Banner's stemming pile of BS answer to this question cannot go unchallenged....Phil Dawson?

If the Browns lose games because our retread kickers are not able to perform to standard Dawson set last season...it's going to be squarely on Haslam and Banner's shoulders.

Banner went cheap, not willing to pay for the best available kicker, not even trying to retain our best player.

I could not help but notice, Pluto didn't have the guts to challenge Banner on his decision to kick Dawson to the curb.

This subject is not going to go away just because Banner refuses to answer questions on the subject ...or because the local media doesn't have the guts to put Banner on the hot seat.

Last edited by mac; 07/21/13 11:20 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
mac #800404 07/21/13 11:22 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Quote:

Quote:

Q: How do you see free agency?

A: Winning teams are built through the draft, and by retaining their best players.




jc...

Banner's stemming pile of BS answer to this question cannot go unchallenged....Phil Dawson?

If the Browns lose games because our retread kickers are not able to perform to standard Dawson set last season...it's going to be squarely on Haslam and Banner's shoulders.

Banner went cheap, not willing to pay for the best available kicker, not even trying to retain our best player.

I could not help but notice, Pluto didn't have the guts to challenge Banner on his decision to kick Dawson to the curb.

This subject is not going to go away just because Banner refuses to answer questions on the subject ...or because the local media doesn't have the guts to put Banner on the hot seat.




I liked Dawson also,, wanted him retained. But it's not like as if he was the only issue Banner and Co. had to deal with.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
eotab #800405 07/21/13 11:30 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
I agree with you Eotab, why add the phrase, "except special teams coordinator Chris Tabor" to the sentence?

It would have stood, as is, without that addition. Read them that way.

The original question: Why did you replace virtually all the key people in the front office and coaching staff, except special teams coordinator Chris Tabor?

...and then...

the original question without the added phrase: Why did you replace virtually all the key people in the front office and coaching staff?

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

Love ya man, but it's nitpicky.. no way around it.. those that are pros at their jobs still make a mistake from time to time.




Then the proofreaders have fallen down on the job. But, still, why write it down or ask the question in such a way. I don't think it's nitpicking at all. I think it tells us where Pluto's head is.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,959
Quote:

Quote:

Love ya man, but it's nitpicky.. no way around it.. those that are pros at their jobs still make a mistake from time to time.




Then the proofreaders have fallen down on the job. But, still, why write it down or ask the question in such a way. I don't think it's nitpicking at all. I think it tells us where Pluto's head is.




I think he's human and missed it. Joe Thomas, an all pro has missed blocks, so where is his head.

we can debate this until the cows come home, but to me it's equal to correcting posters on here for misspelling or using the wrong word "your or you're" most all of us know the difference but still, the mistakes are made. I do it all the time and so do others. We know better, but dang it, it happens.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
You could be right and it's the proofreader and the editor that don't know jack about the Browns.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
If Banner is as smart as Pluto believes, then Terry must be way off in his assertion that Banner believes the West Cost Offense is antiquated.

The 49er's, Redskins, Texans, Bengals, Seahawks, and Packers made the playoffs running it. The Jets, Eagles, Chiefs, Raiders, Dolphins and Bears will all be running some form of it as well this season. That's 12 teams running various forms of the West Coast offense this coming season. Most other teams will have some WCO tenants in their offensive schemes. Bill Walsh is alive and well in the modern NFL.

Besides, our new offense is hardly a spring chicken. "Air Coryell" has been around just as long as the WCO. That's why I'm fine with Norv bringing it here. It's a PROVEN system that gets results when you have the players to run it.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
The Air Coryell system is the genesis of that was called the 'West Coast Offense'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Coast_offense

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Yes. both the Coryell and Walsh systems have been referred to as "West Coast offense" at one time, but they have no real relation to each other.
Since the early 80's when the Walsh system consistently won, it's taken over the name West Coast offense(though it was conceived in Cincinnati) . Air Coryell is being referred to as the "numbers" system, and or the Greatest Show on turf offense now.
Both systems are proven over time and still effective today in various forms. Both have won multiple Super Bowls. But they aren't the same and have completely different lineage.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
mac #800412 07/21/13 02:30 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
B
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
If you did as much "research" as you have been claiming for the last several days, you would understand Dawson didn't want to be here any longer. He didn't want to be here the last two years we franchised him.

He kept telling us it would take a multi-year deal, yet he just signed with the Niners for 1 year.

I like Phil, but he wasn't dealing with us as he was with other teams....that tells me he was ready to leave.



Plus, had your heros, Homie and Heck signed him to a multi-year deal, he would still be here.

Banner and Lombardi have said they want players who want to be here...thus, Phil is gone.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
I'ts not nit-picky. It would be if the interviewer were a national media member. But this was Pluto. A local beat writer who does, in fact, know this team inside and out. He's likely met and talked with every coach on the staff at one point or another.

It's a gaff that I wouldn't expect Pluto to make with the preparation he had going in.

Like eo' said, his questions were prepared ahead of time. He should have mentioned Warhop along with Tabor. He certainly had time to do it. Many board members would have remembered Warhop just as eo' did.

The reason it's important is that if a fan didn't know about Warhop he/she could get into an argument that Tabor is the only coach kept from the old regime and use that article as "proof" that it is true. I could see an argument like that happen here on this board and we all know that we want accuracy in our debates. (A good reason why just because someone provides a link to a statement that it is not guaranteed to be the end-it-all truth of the matter. Once source does not settle the matter)

After all, it was Pluto and Banner. You'd expect that what you heard from them to be the end-all truth of the matter.

Pluto should not have left Warhop out and/or Banner should have corrected him.


#gmstrong
mac #800414 07/21/13 02:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:

Banner went cheap, not willing to pay for the best available kicker, not even trying to retain our best player.



Phil was NOT our best player.

Still can't believe all the good comments that are not being addressed and the primary focus is the leaving out of one coach.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,513
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,513
Overall nice article

I like the fact that the FO wants a long time winner and aggressive team - but we've herd this before

The most curious to me was saying that there were 11 starters that are good enough to be around when we turn into a winner - wonder who banner is referring to


<><

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
Quote:

Overall nice article

I like the fact that the FO wants a long time winner and aggressive team - but we've herd this before

The most curious to me was saying that there were 11 starters that are good enough to be around when we turn into a winner - wonder who banner is referring to




Joe Thomas, Alex Mack, Mitchell Schwartz, Phil Taylor, Desmond Bryant, Paul Kruger, Barkevious Mingo, Joe Haden, Trent Richardson, D'Qwell Jackson and maybe rubin?


being a browns fan is like taking your dog to vet every week to be put down...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Thomas
Kruger
Bryant
Haden
Mack
Richardson
Taylor
DQ
Schwartz
Ward
Mingo

Just a guess.

Gordon could be on it, but his off the field behavior is a concern. There are also some concerns about TRIch and Ward because of injuries. DQ might be kinda old by the time we get really good. I guess Sheard could be on the list. So could Reubin, but he will be getting older too.

Kinda hard to say.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Quote:

Still can't believe all the good comments that are not being addressed and the primary focus is the leaving out of one coach.




apologies...I again forgot to Private message my post before submitting it.

Good Gosh man, really


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
This was a very good read. Thanks for posting it Peen.

They put a lot of thought into what they were going to be running and I think it shows in the coaching decisions. BTW I am super Happy that it did not work out with Chip Kelly.

Quote:


Q: Why did you replace virtually all the key people in the front office and coaching staff, except special teams coordinator Chris Tabor?

A: We didn't come into this expecting to make this many changes. But yes, we turned over the organization.




Pluto was directing Banner towards making a comment on Tabor. Banner just didnt answer the way Pluto was probably expecting.

Loved Banner's answer on trading picks this year for next year.

Anyway, Banner isnt the kind of person I would have over for dinner as I do find him to be a penny pinching ass but he stuck his neck out and made a lot of tough decisions and very few do I have a problem with. He can count bottles of water, put up vending machines in the locker for all i care, just as long as he produces.

I didnt like the hiring of Lombardi and the drafting of Mingo. Other than that I have no problem with what he has done. He didnt hire Chip Kelly who was obviously at the very least Haslam's first choice and for me that was a positive. He hired the guy I wanted as HC for a long time. I think he also struck gold in bringing in Kruger and Bryant.

The trade was a solid move as well. Complain about the failure to upgrade the secondary but people complaining that we lost a kicker via free agency is silly and to complain that we trade a later pick this year for an earlier pick next is not something to complain about. Hell getting anything for Colt was brilliant.

eotab #800420 07/21/13 04:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quit being such a baby. There is a ton of football in the article. Why is it wrong to want to talk about that?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:

Loved Banner's answer on trading picks this year for next year.




Me too. I thought it was an excellent move at the time and I still think it was the right thing to do.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:


Q: But the quarterback ...

A: On offense, we want to see what develops before making big changes, other than the scheme. And the change on offense is just as big as from the 4-3 to the 3-4 on defense.

Q: Why didn't you change many of the players on offense?

A: It's hard to know their potential because so many of them -- not just Brandon -- are so young. Also, the coaches looked at Brandon and some of the others and saw enough there to want to see more. [The coaches'] input is very important on this.




I think this is very telling. Again, this is a year of evaluation for many of our younger players, especially on the offensive side of the ball.

Hopefully, most of those guys will prove to be players. That may be wishful thinking, but I think it is wise to give the youngsters a chance to prove themselves---one way or another. The fact that so many were high draft picks makes that even more true.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Quote:

Quote:

Loved Banner's answer on trading picks this year for next year.




Me too. I thought it was an excellent move at the time and I still think it was the right thing to do.


An unusual but intriquing move by Lombardi (I suspect). In a weak draft, it may play out in our favor. However, we may have missed out on a potentially sound player at a position of need: OG/OC. Barrett Jones, Alabama, was there for the taking in rd 4. We may regret this move...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
B
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
I liked Jones as well, but he isn't a world beater....more of him will surface.


I also like the idea of moving up a round in next years draft, and out of this draft.


That doesn't mean we will increase our odds, but I like the chances at this point.


And....we have some guys the FO isn't sold on or turned off on....so it gives at least 2 players a chance to make or break.


I like that.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Loved Banner's answer on trading picks this year for next year.




Me too. I thought it was an excellent move at the time and I still think it was the right thing to do.


An unusual but intriquing move by Lombardi (I suspect). In a weak draft, it may play out in our favor. However, we may have missed out on a potentially sound player at a position of need: OG/OC. Barrett Jones, Alabama, was there for the taking in rd 4. We may regret this move...




32...good point, Barrett Jones sitting there for the Browns to jump on in the fourth, instantly adding competition and depth at OG, OT and Center. But Jones also plays OT, so that would have brought depth and competition at the RT spot, too.

I'm sure Alex Mack was happy when Banner decided to pass on Jones, the most versatile OL guy in the draft. Drafting Jones would strengthened the entire OLine, providing quality backup until he is ready to step into one of the many positions he can play.

Banner and Lombardi couldn't find a capable man at their 111 slot...yet the Rams had no problem drafting Jones two picks later at #113.

I guess the Browns don't need players like this... web page

How many other teams felt this draft was so weak that they would trade out of their 4th and 5th round slots?

Just more manure spreading excuses for not getting the job done on draft day. There was talent available...our front office just had to be smart enough to identify talent and do the job they were hired to do.

Banner wants everyone to believe he is the smartest football guy in the room...problem is, Banner expertise is not on the football side of the franchise...it's on the financial side..stadium building/improvements, salary cap, contracts.

Banner attempedt to venture into the football side of the Eagles...it ended up costing Banner his job.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,856
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,856
Quote:

Quote:


Q: But the quarterback ...

A: On offense, we want to see what develops before making big changes, other than the scheme. And the change on offense is just as big as from the 4-3 to the 3-4 on defense.

Q: Why didn't you change many of the players on offense?

A: It's hard to know their potential because so many of them -- not just Brandon -- are so young. Also, the coaches looked at Brandon and some of the others and saw enough there to want to see morÞ. [The coaches'] input is very important on this.




I think this is very telling. Again, this is a year of evaluation for many of our younger players, especially on the offensive side of the ball.

Hopefully, most of those guys will prove to be players. That may be wishful thinking, but I think it is wise to give the youngsters a chance to prove themselves---one way or another. The fact that so many were high draft picks makes that even more true.




And I think that was the way to go. We knew there had to be a lot of turn over on the D side with the scheme change and the fact we had a lot of holes even before that.

Impossible to effect such change on both sides so this is a good year to evualuate our O talent.

I was not a big fan of Banner because I thought we were trading one egomaniac for another and yes Mac he has made some mistakes but over all Ya gotta like his direction.

I also like that he seems to get it that some of his decisioins were not going to go over well, at least initially, shows he is at the very least somewhat turned into the fan base and it's history


#gmstrong

A smart person knows what to say.

A wise person knows whether or not to say it.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 658
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 658
I think it's a little bit of picking at nits.

The key guys are HC, OC, DC, GM, and STC.

Then it's positional guys, mostly, - offensive line coach, strength and conditioning coach, etc.

Finally, dining hall cook, and the third toilet maid.

You have to draw the line somewhere when you define key guys. I might draw the 'key guy' line a little higher.


Thomas - The Tank Engine
Divot #800428 07/21/13 06:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
I think you're nit-picking the nit-pickers.


#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Quote:

I liked Jones as well, but he isn't a world beater....



Barrett Jones:

Career highlights and awards
SEC Championship (2009, 2012)
BCS National Championship (2009, 2011, 2012)
Wuerffel Trophy (2011)
Outland Trophy (2011)
Jacobs Blocking Trophy (2011)
First-team All-SEC (2011, 2012)
Consensus All-American (2011, 2012)
William V. Campbell Trophy (2012)
Rimington Trophy (2012)

Many mock drafts had him going late 1st, early 2nd; why he fell, I do'nt know. But, I will let his record in college speak for itself...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 857
J
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
J
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 857
+1
and how about winters from kent state.

mac #800431 07/21/13 07:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,313
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,313
ya know i don't usually post much unless it during the season in the countdown thread...or the gameday thread, but I am so tired of your idiotic BS that I have to post this. I was a construction foreman for over 35yrs and if I had someone like you, you wouldn't have last 15min. before you were fired. and believe me I watched the 64 game so you have nothing on me except you are a single view ass...you say you resreach, but it's only your point and nothing else...I have learned over the yrs. that it's a team effert.. somethings you need the younguns and sometimes you need the older guys, BUT if you're basing your aurgment that Phil was our best player[ then are an idiot and i'll take my 30 days now and it was worth it..


The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,276
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,276
Banner is growing on me. I love Josh Gordon who lombardi pooped on..I was pretty miffed about the lombardi hire. I think banner being kind of ugly factors in as well unfortunately. But over the past few months ive learned to stick to print and audio and my opinion on him has gone up quite a bit. I love his coaching staff, the best I could want, and the draft was within my reasonable choice spectrum. I see no glaring mistakes and a lot of shrewd moves so far so kudos to you Mr. Banner.

I thought the 11 starters thing was harsh. I dont see any team ever having 22 above average guys starting, I dont want to pick apart rosters but I am sure playoff teams last year had some weak spots. I'd say we are at 13-14above average players with Mingo/Sheard, Richardson, and Gordon being the questionmarks in that tally. Aside from an elite qb I dont think you need a better team than we have to win it all.

I had the same criteria for coaches and was excited about chip kelly. However in terms of loyalty, humility, sanity, and Nfl contacts, Chud blows him out of the water. If I had known we were vetting Chud whwn looking at Kelly the choice would have been clear. God our staff is so very good, it is a bizarre feeling.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Cleveland Browns' President Joe Banner has brought a new energy to Berea, now it's about winning -- Bud Shaw

Bud Shaw, The Plain Dealer By Bud Shaw, The Plain Dealer

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Joe Banner points to the kind of smart transactions he believes signify a new and improved operation in Berea.

Getting something in return for Colt McCoy was one move he mentioned in Sunday's Plain Dealer Q&A. Not giving up much of anything to land wide receiver Davone Bess was another. Trading mid-round picks in a weak draft for better mid-round picks in a presumed stronger draft is something Banner called a "no brainer."

All that is nice in a draft wonk sort of way. But far more intriguing are the major moves Tom Heckert made in last year's draft.

They're intriguing because we suspect Banner wouldn't have bit on any of them. And because they carry such high risk-reward. And, lastly, because Banner will live with them this season after smartly deferring to the offensive coaches he hired to maximize the players Heckert delivered at quarterback, running back and No. 1 wide receiver.

Picking Brandon Weeden in the first round.

Trading up to draft Trent Richardson and running counter to a league trend in the process.

Taking a second-round flyer on Josh Gordon in the supplemental draft.

Heckert is gone from Berea, not because those moves constituted strike one, two and three. But certainly those choices didn't represent anything Banner would laud as championship architecture.

Banner would've opted for his quarterback near the top of the draft as the Eagles did in landing Donovan McNabb. Ryan Tannehill would've been on his radar were he in charge a year ago.

Would he have done enough to land the rights to Robert Griffin III? We'll never know. But my guess is he would've been as aggressive as the offense and defense he ultimately wants to build in Berea

In a quarterback's league, no way Banner would've traded up to draft a position (running back) with such a short NFL lifespan. And, we can further presume, he would have preferred a running back not so committed to seeking out contact.

You can't punish tacklers for long in this league and turn too many one-yard gains into a steel-cage-only-one-man-walks-away battle. There's too many of tacklers and only one of you.

The Gordon decision might outrank the other two as questionable moves in Banner's mind for reasons that included the wide receiver's inexperience and his lifestyle issues. Gordon is a mixed bag in that regard. He came along quickly. He'll also miss the season's first two games after another failed drug test.

It's hard to argue too strenuously for the Weeden choice after a season in which he lacked accuracy and instincts critical at the position.

I liked the Richardson pick because he's a three-down back who can block, but you can find good running backs later in the draft.

Whatever doubts Banner held about Weeden and Gordon in particular he decided to go after pass rushers in free agency (Paul Kruger) and the draft (Barkevious Mingo).

"On offense, we want to see what develops before making big changes, other than the scheme," Banner told the PD. "And the change on offense is just as big as from the 4-3 to the 3-4 on defense."

Translation: the Browns didn't have the personnel to run the attacking 3-4 defense Banner believes is the best approach in a quarterback league. So they went shopping.

He recognized that whatever shortcomings Weeden and Gordon might have, they better fit the downfield passing game Rob Chudzinksi and Norv Turner like to run.

For all the concerns whispered about Banner -- that he wants to run the personnel department in addition to his CEO duties-- he embraced what Rob Chudzinski and Norv Turner had to say about Weeden.

Or maybe he simply saw nothing better than Weeden in this year's draft and free agent market.

Whatever, the Browns are taking the smart approach in giving Weeden every chance to succeed. Defensively, accumulating pass rushers is exactly what they needed.

Why should this time around be any different in Berea?

We don't know it will be until we see if this team has found its starting quarterback and its head coach.

We've seen optimism accumulate many times before while the victories continue to be collected in the same small pile. [url=http://www.cleveland.com


/budshaw/index.ssf/2013/07/post_57.html]web page[/url]
Banner hired Chud and they tried to get Mallet in here. I cant complain when i agree with what they are doing.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Banner interview

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5