Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 24 of 34 1 2 22 23 24 25 26 33 34
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Another kid that I REALLY like that hasn't gotten much love around here is David Fales.



Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Quote:

vers says his knee injury is because he stands too upright in the pocket




IIRC, Vers was saying he was a knee injury waiting to happen because of this for most of the season.


Crowded elevators smell different to short people...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
LOL........that comment makes me sound dumb. I probably am dumb, so no biggie. BTW Steve, will you answer a couple of questions about running backs for me? I replied to you on the Post Game Thoughts thread.

TopDawg: Mettenberger?

I wrote about him a few times on here. I don't think much has changed since then, but here are some of my observations.

--Great size.

--He stands very tall in the pocket. His set-up and delivery remind me of Tom Brady.

--Very strong arm. He can make all the throws and can drive it into tight windows. I love the trajectory on his throws.

--I said he was a knee injury waiting to happen and while it may have just a coincidence that he suffered a knee injury this year, I think the fact that he stands so upright w/out any natural knee bend makes him susceptible to knee injuries. This is made even more true because he stands like that even when pass rushers are bearing down on him.

--I question his decision making at times. He sometimes forces the ball into coverage.

--He can be accurate, but goes through stretches where he struggles in that area.

--I think his knee injury is going to hurt his draft status.

Summary: He has some good tools, but I think the position is evolving and I would prefer a guy who has at least some mobility. The knee thing worries me. I hope we don't draft the guy. I've been wrong before and will be again. You could be right and this might be the guy.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

I actually like Mettenberger a lot. I think he does a lot of things you look for in an NFL QB.

The thing that impresses me the most is, he seems to throw to 'unopen' receivers far more often than the rest of these QB's. Mettenberger has great timing with his receivers and often throws before the break and throws receivers open.

A lot of college QB's because of schemes and the lack of talent on the defensive side of the ball tend to throw to a lot of wide open receivers. I've seen a lot of NFL quality throws from Mettenberger though.




And he also has a OC at LSU that was an NFL OC.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Quote:

JC

Gil Brandt's 3 Tiers of QB's in the 2014 draft ...

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000...terback-in-2014

13 NFL teams positioned to draft quarterback in 2014

By Gil Brandt
NFL Media senior analyst
Dec. 10, 2013

There have been 48 quarterbacks to start in the NFL this season, including a pair -- Matt Flynn and Josh Freeman -- who have started for two teams. That's one more than all of last year.

Pretty amazing stat when you think about it. Stability at the quarterback position has been absent for several years now in the NFL. Impatient owners. Coaches trying to save their jobs. Injuries.

Did we mention injuries?

Quarterbacks are like left-handers in baseball -- teams can never have enough of them. The numbers are there; emphasis of early development at the high-school level has increased the pool in recent years. But quality remains an issue.

Take the 2011 NFL Draft, in which four quarterbacks -- Cam Newton, Jake Locker, Blaine Gabbert and Christian Ponder -- were taken inside the top 12 picks. Two years later, three of the teams that selected them are looking for replacements.

And this year? Pretty good depth in the pool; I'm just not sure how many will still be swimming two years from now.

At this point, and it's early, here's how I see the top three tiers of potential quarterbacks in this upcoming draft:

Tier 1: Louisville's Teddy Bridgewater, Texas A&M's Johnny Manziel, and Fresno State's Derek Carr. Bridgewater and Manziel are underclassmen but have given every indication they are coming out early. In my opinion, all three have an above-average chance of going in the top 10.

Tier 2: Alabama's AJ McCarron, Eastern Illinois' Jimmy Garoppolo, Georgia's Aaron Murray (torn ACL but could be a late steal), Clemson's Tajh Boyd, San Jose State's David Fales and LSU's Zach Mettenberger (ACL tear).

Tier 3: Missouri's James Franklin, Ball State's Keith Wenning, Cornell's Jeff Matthews, Miami's Stephen Morris, TCU's Casey Pachall (great arm, suspended last year), Nebraska's Taylor Martinez, Northern Illinois' Jordan Lynch (reminds me of Roger Staubach at Navy -- competitive, good runner, but doesn't throw the greatest ball).


(These lists would change if underclassmen like UCLA's Brett Hundley and Central Florida's Blake Bortles decide to enter the draft, but both remain undecided.)

So while we can argue all day about the quality of this quarterback class, the numbers will be there, and there will be no shortage of teams snatching them up in the draft. I've created two categories of teams that need to address their QB situations next May: "must-have" and "depth collection."

Must-have
New York Jets: Geno Smith wasn't the answer for the Jets this season. The question is, will he ever be the answer? I don't think one year is enough to get a true evaluation on a player, especially a quarterback, but teams are impatient these days. They feel they can't afford to spend two to three years trying to figure it out, especially in New York. The Jets are a middling 6-7 and might not be in position to take one of the top guys.

Jacksonville Jaguars: Blaine Gabbert is healthy, and the Jaguars are still not playing him. That should tell you everything about whether he fits into the team's long-term plans. Chad Henne is a nice backup but has limitations as a full-time starter. It's a bit unfair to judge how he has done this season, because the Jaguars lack talent around him.

Cleveland Browns: The Browns have been getting some production out of Jason Campbell, but Josh Gordon can make a lot of quarterbacks look good. Campbell is more than serviceable as a backup and replacement starter. He shouldn't be seen as more than that in Cleveland or anywhere else. Only four teams currently have a worse record than the Browns, so they could be drafting pretty high.

Oakland Raiders: Like Cleveland, the Raiders are heading for a top-10 pick. Matt McGloin and Terrelle Pryor aren't long-term answers, but the draft could provide it. So could free agency, where the Raiders are expected to have somewhere between $40 million to $50 million in cap money to spend. If they address quarterback there, other holes could be filled in the draft by trading down to acquire additional picks, like the Raiders did last year.

Minnesota Vikings: The Vikings could be looking at a top-five pick when all is said and done. Ponder has been OK, but can he take a team to the playoffs? I'm not sure. And I can't figure the Josh Freeman thing out. He's been active for only one game; why isn't he playing? It seems that neither have starting futures in Minnesota. All three of my Tier 1 QBs would be upgrades.

Tennessee Titans: Jake Locker is, as they say, what he is. He will always look good in practice but lacks consistency in games. In high school and at Washington, under new USC coach Steve Sarkisian, he was never a terribly accurate passer, and that trend has followed him into the NFL. I think the Titans need to go get themselves another quarterback for the future.

Houston Texans: Matt Schaub has no future in Houston, and Case Keenum, no matter what owner Bob McNair says, shouldn't be viewed as more than a capable (and cheap) backup and spot starter. I think they'll end up with the No. 1 overall draft pick, and they'll have their choice of quarterbacks.

Depth collection
St. Louis Rams: The Rams own Washington's first-round pick, which is looking better and better each week. I don't think they would take a quarterback in the first round, especially as high as they'll be drafting. Maybe the second or third round. They'll be looking to groom someone behind Sam Bradford.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Personally, I'm a little surprised by how well Mike Glennon has played as a rookie. He might be the answer. I saw a guy who wasn't very accurate, especially to his left. I also had questions about his athletic ability, but he has shown surprising athleticism. Even if the Bucs think Glennon is their guy, they still need a backup.

Atlanta Falcons: This is pretty simple: Matt Ryan doesn't have a backup, and the Falcons don't have someone to groom behind their starter.

Green Bay Packers: We found out pretty quickly the Packers didn't have anyone behind Aaron Rodgers, and they're paying a dear price. Historically, when guys get hurt, it continues. I hope that's not the case here, but the Packers have to protect themselves in the short- and long-term.

San Diego Chargers: Philip Rivers has had a resurgent year, but he turned 32 on Sunday, and the Chargers really have no one they're grooming. Now's the time to think about the future.

Pittsburgh Steelers: Ben Roethlisberger has two more years left on a contract that puts a $19 million hit on the Steelers' cap next year. Is Ben going to give Pittsburgh the hometown discount like Tom Brady did? It's a big question that might get some answers in the upcoming draft.






Lombardi likes the SEC, we know that much so any of the top QB's will be under his eyeball, especially McCarron..his Bama boys.
Hundley should be in the mix as well as Bridgewater..etc..now I've read at least twice the Browns have no interest in Johnny Football, which could be a smokescreen or it may actually be so.
I personally have little interest in the guy as his college game IMO does not translate to the pros.
Once they contain his running and pound him a few times I feel he will struggle a lot.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
I know the name, but that's about it. Maybe you can answer a few questions for me.

What type of offense does he run?

Does he hold the ball, or does he get rid of the ball quickly? Is he a smart kid who can be "sped up" with coaching, or is he likely to slow down at the professional level.

How are his feet and mechanics?

Is he able to lead his receivers effectively with his throws? Does he throw them open, or does he throw them into danger?

Which defenses have given him the most trouble, and why do you think they did?



I think that he sounds like a guy who is going to have to learn to get the ball out quickly on a consistent basis to avoid damaging hits. However, he also sounds like a guy who could be a good fit in a Norv Turner offense. Big arm, good accuracy, able to make all of the throws ........ sounds like what they want more than mobility. Do you think that he can be a good to great QB if he learns how to move effectively in the pocket, and to get the ball out quickly?


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Didn't I read a story on here where Bridgewater said very clearly that he wasn't sure if he was coming out this year?

Brandt says that every indication is that he will come out.. I'm confused.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Quote:

Didn't I read a story on here where Bridgewater said very clearly that he wasn't sure if he was coming out this year?

Brandt says that every indication is that he will come out.. I'm confused.




Mariota said he wasn't, then he said he would wait till after the bowl game..I think Bridgewater will do the same as well as a few others. Once they get the word of where they will go in the draft they will make their choice.
And since the draft is a month later, there's no urgency to say anything now.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:

I know the name, but that's about it. Maybe you can answer a few questions for me.



I'll try.

Quote:

What type of offense does he run?




LSU has always been a power team that runs first. They brought in Cam Cameron this year. He was the OC who was fired by Baltimore during the regular season this year. LSU still is a run first, but they did push the ball downfield more this past season. The previous season, they really struggled in terms of not throwing the ball down the field. Mettenberger is not a Spread QB, so that is a positive. His LSU offense is closer to NFL offenses than the Spread offenses are. So, that is good.


Quote:


Does he hold the ball, or does he get rid of the ball quickly? Is he a smart kid who can be "sped up" with coaching, or is he likely to slow down at the professional level.




He does hold the ball in the pocket. That's why he takes some hits. He was sacked quite a bit. He does look to have a quick release, though. I really don't know how smart he is. Like I said earlier, he has improved his decision making, but he sometimes makes some decisions that make you shake your head.

I really don't know how he will respond to coaching in the NFL. I do worry about him holding the ball and taking big hits.


Quote:

How are his feet and mechanics?




He throws the ball over the top and his release is pretty quick. His delivery is a little long and he sometimes gets sloppy w/it, which leads to his occasional accuracy problems, especially on shorter throws.

He stands very tall in the pocket. His feet look to be well positioned. Again, my concern is that he plays w/stiff knees. This limits his mobility in the pocket and he will be prone to knee injuries.



Quote:

Is he able to lead his receivers effectively with his throws? Does he throw them open, or does he throw them into danger?




I think he can lead his receivers. I can't really say if he throws them open or not. He has very good receivers in Beckham Jr. and Jarvis Landry. These guys get a lot of separation. Mettenberger does force the ball into coverages though. He was picked 3 times in a loss to Mississippi. He forced every throw into double or triple coverage.


Quote:

Which defenses have given him the most trouble, and why do you think they did?




Teams that pressure him give him trouble. Ole Miss, Alabama, and Florida all got to him and it really hurt his performances. He was sacked 21 times this year and 32 times last year. I think that him taking sacks and big hits are a big concern.

I do want to add this one thing. I am not trying to pile on, but I think a lot of people might be unaware of his legal issue. I'll post an excerpt from an article about his arrest and conviction.

Quote:


Ex-QB admits groping bar worker
Posted: Tuesday, May 04, 2010
By Marc Weiszer

Former Georgia quarterback Zach Mettenberger pleaded guilty Monday to two counts of misdemeanor sexual battery, saying he is taking "full responsibility" for his actions.


Mettenberger, who was kicked off the team by coach Mark Richt on April 18, grabbed the breasts and buttocks of a woman at Flip Flops, a bar near Valdosta, on March 7, according to Southern Judicial Circuit District Attorney J. David Miller. The victim was an employee of the bar but not working that night, Miller said.

"He was at the bar and was highly, highly intoxicated," Miller said. "He grabbed the young lady in places he had no business placing his hands."


Bar staff removed Mettenberger; he was arrested that night on underage drinking and other charges.

The Oconee County High School graduate was sentenced to 12 months of probation under the Georgia First Offender Act and will be required to complete 80 hours of community service and pay a $2,000 fine.

He also cannot drink alcohol or be at any place where alcoholic beverages are sold, is banished from the city of Valdosta and must have no contact - direct or indirect - with the victim. She is a student at Valdosta State University, according to the student newspaper, The Spectator.

Prosecutors spoke with members of the Remerton Police Department, which arrested Mettenberger, and the victim, and both were satisfied with the resolution, Miller said.

http://onlineathens.com/stories/050410/foo_632586081.shtml />


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
What about Fales?

I actually have him as my #2 QB, behind Mettenberger, ahead of Bridgewater.

With Bortles and Carr being my 4 and 5.



Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
For the record, I know Bridgewater is the consensus #1 QB, I just don't see it.

My rankings are how I would rank them, if I had no prior knowledge of their actual draft stock.



Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Vers - I agree with your Mettenberger analysis completely.

Someone else mentioned that he throws to unopen receivers as if it was a good thing. The problem is that he forces things in to unopen receivers. Quite often there is another wr wide open for an easy pitch and catch.


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
I said that about him throwing receivers open.

And I'm not referencing the times he makes poor reads and throws into double coverage.

I'm talking about when he makes throws much before the receiver makes his break, and the receiver ends up open but wasn't when Mettenberger threw the ball. THAT is what impresses me with him.



Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Certainly wasn't trying to make you sound dumb. It was just what I remembered you saying about him. i agree with everything you put in those comments, though I wouldn't have thought to say that all on my own.

As far as Brandt's list,

Quote:

Tier 1: Louisville's Teddy Bridgewater, Texas A&M's Johnny Manziel, and Fresno State's Derek Carr.

Tier 2: Alabama's AJ McCarron, Eastern Illinois' Jimmy Garoppolo, Georgia's Aaron Murray (torn ACL but could be a late steal), Clemson's Tajh Boyd, San Jose State's David Fales and LSU's Zach Mettenberger (ACL tear).

Tier 3: Missouri's James Franklin, Ball State's Keith Wenning, Cornell's Jeff Matthews, Miami's Stephen Morris, TCU's Casey Pachall (great arm, suspended last year), Nebraska's Taylor Martinez, Northern Illinois' Jordan Lynch (reminds me of Roger Staubach at Navy -- competitive, good runner, but doesn't throw the greatest ball).





Garoppolo is way overrated IMO. Watched two of his games and he was useless... throwing screens and being off target on anything downfield. I don't understand where the hype comes from.

I'd put Mettenberger in that first group if not for injury.

Saw a couple games of Wenning's this year and wasn't impressed. He played ok but didn't look like an NFL prospect at all.

Jeff Matthews is terrible, I can't understand why he's even being considered an NFL prospect. Just awful. Wasn't even good playing at half speed against the Ivy Leaguers.

Stephen Morris and Casey Pachall have way more ability than anyone else in that tier 3 group, but both are questionable upstairs. Morris can be a headcase on the field, though he throws the best deep ball of anyone in the draft. Pachall really got his butt kicked playing behind TCU's line this year. Saw him play vs. WVU and he made some really nice plays but was getting nailed just about every dropback. He made a couple headscratcher throws, too. I think he's a guy who will probably stick around a couple years as a backup but never be able to fully put it together.

Taylor Martinez isn't a quarterback. IMO Jordan Lynch plays like Tebow, FWIW. Cincy's Brendon Kay is better than half the guys on that tier 3 list.

JMO.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:

What about Fales?

I actually have him as my #2 QB, behind Mettenberger, ahead of Bridgewater.

With Bortles and Carr being my 4 and 5.




I wrote this about Fales in November:

Quote:

I was also surprised w/David Fales. Heard he had a weak arm and was too short. Not sure where all that came from. He looked to be at least 6;3". Here is what I saw:

--Very quick release
--Extremely accurate
--Great touch
--Strong enough arm. It wasn't weak
--Better athlete than credited for
--Clutch throws
--Mobility in the pocket
--Great touch on deep throws
--Spun it when he had to




I think Fales will be drafted in the 3rd or 4th round. Most say his arm isn't strong enough and his body of work is not extensive.

Now, about your rankings. Let's just say I really disagree w/them. In my mind, it's Teddy and everyone else. I don't even think it is close.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Quote:


Now, about your rankings. Let's just say I really disagree w/them. I




Most people would, and I understand that.

Like I said, I just try to rank them based on what I've seen, while ignoring the actual draft projections.

Like you said, Fales is a mid-round guy. But from what I've seen from him, he shouldn't be.

In my mind, my top 4 are pretty close, and I'd be okay with any of them. The drop off from me comes from Bortles to Carr.



Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Yeah, I know you weren't trying to make me look dumb. I did that all on my own.

Man, I agree w/you 100% on Garopoolo, Martinez, and Lynch. Your comments were better than Brandt's.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Misunderstood.

Still think he is a very poor decision maker.


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Jester, what are your takes on Bridgewater and Bortles?

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
We can provide our evaluation of all the quarterback prospects available. We can debate the pro and cons of each guy. We can project how we feel about how that guy will fit what we have seen of our offensive scheme.

However, maybe we should start a dialogue on what we think this management group will do. Speaking just for myself. What I have wanted to happen and what was actually done for the most part has not been the same from any of the previous regimes.

I am starting to get that sinking feeling that Carr will be their guy.

I have not seen enough of him to pass final judgement. He has played five years of college ball. I just saw the USC game which he did not play well.

He has prototype size, enough mobility, a quick release, and plenty of arm strength. Management may fall in love with that and think they can coach up the rest.

I do not want to sell Banner/Lombardi/Chud short yet because this off season will define them.

In the thread called "How would You fix this team," I spelled out what my approach would be.

At this point I see Carr as fools gold.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I will be very upset w/our FO if they draft Carr.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
straight up..

our QB going forward has to be Bridgewater.

if not, than we start hoyer in 2014. i'm sick of watching lousy QB play every freaking week on sundays.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Quote:


However, maybe we should start a dialogue on what we think this management group will do




I've said for a long time that a Mallet trade will happen this offseason and he'll be our QB.



Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197

By next Sunday afternoon after the 1:00 games. The top two picks will be known.

If Washington loses to the Giants and The Texans beat the Titans ( which was one of their two wins this year).

Washington has the first pick by schedule strength.

Of course that means The Rams will be open for business. Bridgewater or somebody else could most likely be had for the right offer.

If the Browns end up in the top five (fourth currently). I am calling the Rams about what it would take. I may try to make that deal now as opposed to waiting till draft day. I would wheel and deal and try to make it happen.

With the Raiders and Jags in play if the Rams got our pick at 4 they could still get Clowney, Barr, Matthews. Should not hurt their plans. My guess would be if the Jags or Raiders wanted Bridgewater they would not go any higher than this years second. The Browns could get him with the second first. Which I would do to get Bridgewater.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
I really hope Bridgewater goes back to school. I do NOT like this QB class outside of him and it's likely we can't have him. Draft a developmental guy in the 4th and go in with Hoyer, Campbell and a rook. I'd rather take a Mettenberger than use a 1st on a guy like Carr.

Unless Hoyer goes to the probowl I still take the best available QB next year. Do the Belichick and trade some picks for next year again and we set ourselves up a lot better than this year IMO. Another OL, WR, S and ILB with high picks plus a better chance at a high caliber QB prospect next year.

I think it's a numbers game and betting your chips on this year QB class seems unwise.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Well if they like him enough to trade for him, they better sign him to an extension in the process. Giving up something (players or draft picks) for a QB while in the final year of his rookie contract is kinda dumb IMO.

IMO I think Mallet is in Belichek's plans. Brady's days are numbered.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Quote:


IMO I think Mallet is in Belichek's plans. Brady's days are numbered.




Well, we know Bellichick isn't afraid to part with a QB who has "diminishing skills" ....



Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Love Bridgewater. Throws a nice ball. Not tremendously mobile but great mobility within the pocket. Overall good accuracy. Occasionally a ball gets away from him. Not sure why. Very calm Qb. An optomistic projection would be a player that mimics Tom Brady. Strong enough arm, smart. A little undersized coming out of college but should get bigger and stronger once in the NFL. My questions about him are things that we as fans cannot answer. Character. I haven't heard anything bad but we don't know. How smart is he? He seems smart but could it be the coaches making him look that way. Leadership. He seems like a leader but how can we know. The it factor. I haven't seen enough late game stuff to know one way or another. I would definitely give up a 1st round pick to move up to get him.

Bortels. I like him but haven't seen enough to know how much. Big kid. His arm strength has been questioned on this board. I think he has a strong enough arm but that it can be deceiving because he throws a lot of "touch" passes. I think that he can zip it in there when needed. Same questions as with Bridgewater. Things that NFL scouts have trouble answering that is impossible for the average fan. The only additional concern that I have heard is a slow release. I hadn't noticed it to be particularly slow but I haven't seen him play since I heard that criticism so I haven't had the opportunity to watch him with an extra critical eye on that aspect of his game.

Past prospects I liked and disliked include

Likes - Luck, Wilson (I really wanted us to grab him in round 4 or 5 but he never got there), Matt Scott (not sure why he cannot make the Jags gameday roster. Why is he relegated to the practice squad?) and Tyler Wilson.

Dislikes - Tannehill, RG3

Looks like I am about 50-50 on my likes, with both my dislikes yet to be determined


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,704
Past likes and dislikes :

I will give myself credit that I'm usually right on QB's I dislike. Typically if I really don't like a QB, I'm right about it. With a few exceptions (ie Aaron Rodgers)

But, when it comes to QB's I like, I'm probably 50/50 if I'm right or not.

Some guys I was higher on than most in the past :

Cam Newton, Jake Locker, Matt Barkley, Russell Wilson, Matt Moore (I might have pimped this guy harder than I ever have a late round pick -- In this case UDFA), and Brandon Weeden

So I'd say I'm also about 50/50 on QB's.



Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197

Watched Bortles in the South Carolina game. He is starting to grow on me. The more I watch him the better I like him.

http://www.youtube.com/v/WYd29xlmc04

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Quote:

I really hope Bridgewater goes back to school. I do NOT like this QB class outside of him and it's likely we can't have him. Draft a developmental guy in the 4th and go in with Hoyer, Campbell and a rook. I'd rather take a Mettenberger than use a 1st on a guy like Carr.

Unless Hoyer goes to the probowl I still take the best available QB next year. Do the Belichick and trade some picks for next year again and we set ourselves up a lot better than this year IMO. Another OL, WR, S and ILB with high picks plus a better chance at a high caliber QB prospect next year.

I think it's a numbers game and betting your chips on this year QB class seems unwise.




this QB class is not the same as Luck/RG3.
These are different in terms of maturity and techniques.
There are several that I know can benefit the Browns and if some of the guys do declare they can get one and sit him for a year.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
Quote:

Quote:

I really hope Bridgewater goes back to school. I do NOT like this QB class outside of him and it's likely we can't have him. Draft a developmental guy in the 4th and go in with Hoyer, Campbell and a rook. I'd rather take a Mettenberger than use a 1st on a guy like Carr.

Unless Hoyer goes to the probowl I still take the best available QB next year. Do the Belichick and trade some picks for next year again and we set ourselves up a lot better than this year IMO. Another OL, WR, S and ILB with high picks plus a better chance at a high caliber QB prospect next year.

I think it's a numbers game and betting your chips on this year QB class seems unwise.




this QB class is not the same as Luck/RG3.
These are different in terms of maturity and techniques.
There are several that I know can benefit the Browns and if some of the guys do declare they can get one and sit him for a year.





Well there isn't a single QB that you know can benefit the Browns. To say that as a certainty is wrong. This class is not any better than Russell/Quinn IMO. That is my opinion. So if you know something the rest of us don't please elaborate.

Carr is horrid. I wouldn't touch him in the 3rd let alone the 1st and there is no way, after evals, that he will be a 1st rounder. Manziel has way too many red flags and doesn't fit the O Chud wants to run. Bortles has a lot of good qualities but I question both his arm strength and velocity which could severely limit his upside. Average arm strength is one thing but I don't even see that. In a vertical O you can't accomplish much with a below average arm.

The problem most fail to keep in high regard is when you invest in a QB you put your HC and entire organization on his shoulders. If he fails it's another reboot with no wins for another 4 years. If you take a guy in the 1st 2 rounds/major FA the only way you keep your job is getting lucky.

It's about job insurance. If you invest in a QB you want to invest in the best possible product because your job depends on it. The only reason to take the 2nd best is if your job is on the line and your desperate like our last 2 QBs. Chud is not in danger for his job. There will be no panic therefore no reason to reach on 3rd round talent in the top 5.

The owner has said he believes in continuity. He preached it. If he believes in the process Chud will not be given only 2 years. He has no reason to reach on the man who'll essentially determine whether he keeps his job or not. I'm sorry but I have no faith in this years QB class and I will gladly endure another painful season if we deem it wise to invest in a stronger QB class. Some say this is a strong class but if Teddy is gone I see nothing worth betting your job on.

Also when did I mention RG3 and Luck? Never said a word about them.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I really hope Bridgewater goes back to school. I do NOT like this QB class outside of him and it's likely we can't have him. Draft a developmental guy in the 4th and go in with Hoyer, Campbell and a rook. I'd rather take a Mettenberger than use a 1st on a guy like Carr.

Unless Hoyer goes to the probowl I still take the best available QB next year. Do the Belichick and trade some picks for next year again and we set ourselves up a lot better than this year IMO. Another OL, WR, S and ILB with high picks plus a better chance at a high caliber QB prospect next year.

I think it's a numbers game and betting your chips on this year QB class seems unwise.




this QB class is not the same as Luck/RG3.
These are different in terms of maturity and techniques.
There are several that I know can benefit the Browns and if some of the guys do declare they can get one and sit him for a year.





Well there isn't a single QB that you know can benefit the Browns. To say that as a certainty is wrong. This class is not any better than Russell/Quinn IMO. That is my opinion. So if you know something the rest of us don't please elaborate.

Carr is horrid. I wouldn't touch him in the 3rd let alone the 1st and there is no way, after evals, that he will be a 1st rounder. Manziel has way too many red flags and doesn't fit the O Chud wants to run. Bortles has a lot of good qualities but I question both his arm strength and velocity which could severely limit his upside. Average arm strength is one thing but I don't even see that. In a vertical O you can't accomplish much with a below average arm.

The problem most fail to keep in high regard is when you invest in a QB you put your HC and entire organization on his shoulders. If he fails it's another reboot with no wins for another 4 years. If you take a guy in the 1st 2 rounds/major FA the only way you keep your job is getting lucky.

It's about job insurance. If you invest in a QB you want to invest in the best possible product because your job depends on it. The only reason to take the 2nd best is if your job is on the line and your desperate like our last 2 QBs. Chud is not in danger for his job. There will be no panic therefore no reason to reach on 3rd round talent in the top 5.

The owner has said he believes in continuity. He preached it. If he believes in the process Chud will not be given only 2 years. He has no reason to reach on the man who'll essentially determine whether he keeps his job or not. I'm sorry but I have no faith in this years QB class and I will gladly endure another painful season if we deem it wise to invest in a stronger QB class. Some say this is a strong class but if Teddy is gone I see nothing worth betting your job on.

Also when did I mention RG3 and Luck? Never said a word about them.




i agree. imo, we should do whatever to get Teddy, but if we can't get him, i honestly don't want us looking at QB in the draft until the 4th round, maybe 3rd.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I really hope Bridgewater goes back to school. I do NOT like this QB class outside of him and it's likely we can't have him. Draft a developmental guy in the 4th and go in with Hoyer, Campbell and a rook. I'd rather take a Mettenberger than use a 1st on a guy like Carr.

Unless Hoyer goes to the probowl I still take the best available QB next year. Do the Belichick and trade some picks for next year again and we set ourselves up a lot better than this year IMO. Another OL, WR, S and ILB with high picks plus a better chance at a high caliber QB prospect next year.

I think it's a numbers game and betting your chips on this year QB class seems unwise.




this QB class is not the same as Luck/RG3.
These are different in terms of maturity and techniques.
There are several that I know can benefit the Browns and if some of the guys do declare they can get one and sit him for a year.





Well there isn't a single QB that you know can benefit the Browns. To say that as a certainty is wrong. This class is not any better than Russell/Quinn IMO. That is my opinion. So if you know something the rest of us don't please elaborate.
Well well wellllll..do we have a new draft analyst in here?
I'm laughing at the superior intellect ...U think what U want but I do know for myself that there is a QB that can benefit the Browns.
U would be foolish(FOR SEVERAL REASONS) to say there isn't.

This class is way better than the group that came out with Quinn.
What I know is because I do something I've done for years, I watch as much as I can, plus I make few comparisons because each QB's are different.


Carr is horrid. I wouldn't touch him in the 3rd let alone the 1st and there is no way, after evals, that he will be a 1st rounder. Manziel has way too many red flags and doesn't fit the O Chud wants to run. Bortles has a lot of good qualities but I question both his arm strength and velocity which could severely limit his upside. Average arm strength is one thing but I don't even see that. In a vertical O you can't accomplish much with a below average arm.

I would not say Carr is horrid. I see a guy that hasn't played against the type of competition that most of the top QB's have faced.
He like a lot of them need to be in the right system and brought along slowly.
I am not interested in Johnny Football as I have already stated.


The problem most fail to keep in high regard is when you invest in a QB you put your HC and entire organization on his shoulders. If he fails it's another reboot with no wins for another 4 years. If you take a guy in the 1st 2 rounds/major FA the only way you keep your job is getting lucky.

It's about job insurance. If you invest in a QB you want to invest in the best possible product because your job depends on it. The only reason to take the 2nd best is if your job is on the line and your desperate like our last 2 QBs. Chud is not in danger for his job. There will be no panic therefore no reason to reach on 3rd round talent in the top 5.
U haven't stated anything earth shattering in those two comments..something I think most already know. The Browns aren't reaching for any QB.

The owner has said he believes in continuity. He preached it. If he believes in the process Chud will not be given only 2 years. He has no reason to reach on the man who'll essentially determine whether he keeps his job or not. I'm sorry but I have no faith in this years QB class and I will gladly endure another painful season if we deem it wise to invest in a stronger QB class. Some say this is a strong class but if Teddy is gone I see nothing worth betting your job on.

Also when did I mention RG3 and Luck? Never said a word about them.




When did I say U did mention them ? I did to emphasize that isn't that type of QB in this draft but there are some good ones. Some will get overdrafted due to the position as most are second rounders at best but for needy teams they will go earlier.
I still happen to like several of them.

Last edited by Attack Dawg; 12/25/13 06:55 PM.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
I guess I think myself foolish then. In all your own superior intellect how about you prove to me why then. Don't tell me why. Prove to me why because without proof all you are is a post number much larger than mine. Age and free time allotted to this board are not things I can change so I guess your proof will have to show everyone why you know for a fact that one of these guys is a possible franchise QB.

We agree on some things but you can't think I'd let you off the hook that easy. When you mentioned RG3/Luck it suggested because of the structure of your comment that there was a correlation there. Personally I grade Bridgewater higher than RG3. As far as instant statistics I think he'll fare better than Luck. He will require a better team around him. Lucks a whole different breed. But yes after Bridgewater there is a significant drop in talent. Hence why I think it's unwise to use a 1st or 2nd and hitch your wagon to a guy with a lot higher probability of failure. It just plain isn't wise IMO.

Last edited by predator16; 12/25/13 07:32 PM.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Blake Bortles has PLENTY of arm strength. Not sure what you're seeing Predator.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Quote:

http://tracking.si.com/2013/12/16/teddy-bridgewater-nfl-draft-2014-entering-undecided-return/

Unless something changed he's still undecided




He took a 10 million dollar insurance policy. It would be more shocking than when Andrew Luck returned.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

...I guess your proof will have to show everyone why you know for a fact that one of these guys is a possible franchise QB.




That door swings both ways. If you're requiring proof from someone else regarding predictions on the future then you'd likewise have to back up your own opinions with proof.

The only proof is after the fact.


#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
The 1st thing with Bortles is his delivery is so slow that he telegraphs every throw. I see a lot of shallow digs that would be defensed. And that's a dig. Not even an out. But that's coachable.

The problem is his balls flutter too often even on short throws in Florida. If you can't throw a tight spiral in Florida you can't throw the ball period in December in Cleveland. Maybe his slow delivery affects this? It gets worse on deep balls. Very noticeable wobble. Admittedly good accuracy from the tape I've seen but It worries me. Idk but it is a major fault. As I said he has a lot of positive qualities and at this point he is easily my no2. The distance between him and Bridgewater is very similar to the distance between him and Manziel/Carr.

I'm not a hater of his but I recognize his faults. Please watch his tapes. He has a very inconsistent spiral, slow release and lack of velocity. If we didn't run a Vert O it'd worry me less but quick delivery, spiral and velocity are of even more importance here. This O requires the QB to take more time in the pocket. He's in closer proximity to the rushers. A slow release and a flutter are bad news IMO.

Page 24 of 34 1 2 22 23 24 25 26 33 34
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Which QB Going Forward? (Next Year)

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5