Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#84310 04/12/07 07:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
My latest article. Thanks to the help of Purp, he helped me figure out how to do the depth charts. This is VERY long. I look forward to a great discussion. Please give your answers to the end questions and thoughts on the thread. This took me about 8 hours to do. I hope you enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed writing it.

Quote:

The goal: to build a winning franchise tradition

We still have several days to the draft, we all say one thing during the season and then during draft time we all want “impact” players and dream of being the Cinderella team. I wanted to explore how we can build a winning FRANCHISE more so than a winning team. I wanted to bring in some realism. To do that, we must first assess our current roster.

I went to the official site and grabbed the roster – immediately got rid of several players we’ll never hear of as those 75 need to be cut to 53 – then trimmed again after the draft. I must tell you, this in itself is a difficult task. I obviously don’t have the advantage of game film and training camp and so forth. You’ll notice a few cuts, but at 4-12, people have to go to infuse fresh blood and better production potential. The players age is in parenthesis.




Kicker – Phil Dawson (32)
Punter – Dave Zastidul (28)
Long Snapper – Ryan Pontbriand (27)
KR/PR - Josh Cribbs (23)

PUP – LeCharles Bentley (27), Gary Baxter (28)


Looking at our team, the weak points in order are as follows:

1. Offensive line – It has been the biggest cause of problems for us since 1999. It is the foundation of championship franchises. The reason I rank it above the defensive line is because if your D is on the bench, the opposing O will have trouble scoring. The right side of our line is very old and bruised and have been dealing with injuries. We need to replace Tucker and Andruzzi as they are oft injured, getting old and lost a step. Our depth needs a massive upgrade.

2. Defensive line - We still have trouble with stopping the run and letting our LB release to the QB and RB in the backfield. Roye and Washington are close to retirement and Smith will be 30 when the season begins. Depth wise, Fraser had a real solid year getting to the QB with 4.5 sacks. He played all 16 games and started 5 accruing 36 tackles. Other than that, our depth needs a massive upgrade

3. Running Back – Lewis is signed to a 1 year deal. Our depth is not strong at this position (anyone noticing a recurring theme?). Harrison has potential, but is still very raw. Bare in mind, he’s a mid-round pick and is still developing. Wright was decent, but I don’t think he’s good enough to be a 3rd RB.

4. Wide receiver – I do believe Edwards is the real deal. To me, too much is made of his attitude. I say that because the attitude I see is that he is tired of losing and plays his ass off every game. Jurevicious is the only proven guy on the roster. Travis Wilson showed great hands in pre-season and his couple catches in the regular season. The real attribute that sticks out is he catches with his hands, not his body. Josh Cribbs is still really raw. I think his best potential lies in being the #5 WR. He is, however, our strongest special teams player. Tim Carter is a stop gap here to stretch the field and replace Northcutt until Cribbs, or a future pick is ready for the role.

5. Tight ends – Winslow is a stud. Heiden has played solid and can block. He loses concentration on some easy catches, but he is valuable. Dinkins is a solid blocking 3rd TE. He’s valuable to special teams. Dinkins and Heiden are each 30 years old, it’s time to think about the future.

6. Cornerback – I believe this is the most over-valued position in the NFL. All the rules go against them. They are only as good as their DL and S. Last years problems were due to lack of QB pressure and the simple fact that our top 3 CB played a combined 12 games. Bodden has shut down Chad Johnson on more than one occasion. He can play. Holly was always around the ball last year. People talk about tipped balls, but id the tipped ball goes to you – chances are you were in the right position to have a shot at a play. It also shows great ball awareness. As a first year starter, this kid has potential. Wright comes from a solid D in Washington. He is a nickleback, nothing more. Perry got a lot of good experience being tossed into the fire. He played “well” given the situation. Typically I’d see him as a 5th CB. Perkins, he’s done. Time to cut the ties. UDRFA Perry beat him to the field, that’s all you need to know. It’d be nice to have Baxter back in the fold. We gained a lot of youth experience last year. I think we’ll benefit greatly this year. Consider Demario Minter as your draft pick since he was on PUP all last year.

7. Quarterback – I believe Frye has the tools, but we really don’t know what we have. Bottom line, with the cast he’s had to work with and the horrendous OC he had for the first 7 games, no one could have succeeded. This is down on the list for the simple fact – if he isn’t the guy, we need to make sure the next guy has an environment conducive to success. Derek Anderson showed back-up ability. He has a cannon for an arm and a quick release. His big problem is once the ball goes over 10 yards his accuracy is gone. Dorsey is an intelligent QB, Browns fans dislike him, but he’s a 3rd string QB. If anyone’s 3rd string QB plays then the team won’t win. So having an intelligent 3rd string QB is an asset. Aside from that, we have too many holes to worry about the 3rd string QB.

8. Safeties – We have youth and talent here. Sean Jones light kicked on last year. I believe Brodney Pool’s light will kick on this year. Mind you, Pool is only 22 years old. We stole him in round 2. In 2 more years we will have one of the top 5 safety tandems in the NFL. Mike Adams is young and experienced and will provide solid depth. Justin Hamilton was a rel nice surprise and played really well for a 7th round pick. He seemed to have good “QB vision.” And was never glaringly out of position.

9. Linebackers – Easily our strongest unit. We did a great job of addressing them last year and I think they have a great future. Wimbley had 11 sacks and was a stud. Dqwell Jackson showed great instincts, especially the last 5 games he played prior to injury. Leon Williams, wow. I liked him the first time I saw him hit the field. Amazing athlete, killer instincts and our best inside pass rusher by far. This is what Chaun Thompson was supposed to be. Peek brings great 3-4 experience and some nice pass rushing skills. People cut on McGinest, but every article I have read about the LBs essentially said he was the most valuable one on the team. He gave the 3 rookies a wealth of knowledge and they took to his leadership. Remember, leadership can be more important than production. His production was the success of the rookies. Chaun Thompson has experience outside and inside. He’s valuable for that alone. I think he’s a great back-up to have. We’ll need to develop more depth, but I think it can wait a year.

10. Kicker – Dawson is 32, but kickers last

11. Punter – Z rocks.

12. Long Snapper – Butch got this one right, sounds silly I know. But I don’t recall him having one bad snap on special teams.

Now that we’ve seen the projected depth chart and gone through our weaknesses; it’s time to draft with the mentality of building a winning FRANCHISE. Win for years to come not for one.

In the NFL draft, the goal of rounds 1 through 3 is to get 3 starters, no, this isn’t Madden so these guys aren’t all day 1 starters – unless you pick as good as I do ) Day 2 picks have a 50/50 shot of making it. The goal is to get at least 2 depth players on day 2. Four and 5 picks make up the bulk of your depth if you scout properly.

I’m trying to keep some realism to the draft as players will go that I want. There will be zero trades in my mock as that involves too much speculation (though the whole draft is speculation). My true thoughts are that Russell and Quinn go 1 and 2. I don’t see Detroit taking Thomas when having Jeff Backus. I think Quinn is the ideal QB to run Mike Martz offense. Intelligent, quick decisions and can make all the throws with great timing.


2007 Cleveland Browns Draft:

Round #1: OT Joe Thomas, Wisconsin – Joe Thomas is the ultimate LT prospect in the NFL draft and the best in years. Four of the last six 1st round OT that won the Outland Trophy have gone on to a combined 22 pro-bowls. That’s as sure as you are going to get at a position.

Strengths:
An excellent athlete for the position...Has outstanding feet...Great size with long arms...Very mobile and agile...Displays great balance and gets set quickly...Able to pull, slide and block in space...Still has the frame to bulk up and add some more weight...Technically sound, instinctive and very smart with top intangibles...Rare prospect who can legitimately play the crucial left tackle position at the pro level.

Weaknesses:
Is only one year removed from a major knee injury...Is not always as aggressive as you'd prefer and could show more of a killer instinct...Needs to get stronger, especially in the lower-body, and develop physically...Struggles a bit with power and the bull rush...Tends to play with a narrow base at times...Is still learning the position to a degree after playing tight end and defensive end early in his career.

Notes:
Was also an excellent shot-putter for the Badger track and field team...Almost came out last year as a junior after he was told that he'd be a Top 10-15 overall pick by the NFL's underclassmen advisory panel but then he tore the ACL in his right knee while playing defensive end in the Badgers bowl game...Is not as good of a pass blocker as D'Brickashaw Ferguson was last year (very few are) but he might be a better all-around player...Will be one of the elite prospects available.

Round #2: DT Justin Harrell, Tennessee – Harrell was hampered by a torn bicep last year. That’s the only reason he’s not a first round pick. The kid can play and is a great size for a 3-4 DE. I wanted to take a G in this spot. However, I believe Grubbs and Blalock will be gone by our pick. I see Blalock going late first round and Grubbs going to either Oakland or Detroit.

Strengths:
Has good size with long arms and the frame to bulk up further...Athletic with solid speed and good quickness...Is mobile with pretty good range...Plays the run well and is a good tackler...Will penetrate and make plays in the backfield...Tough and will play through pain...May have some versatility...Hard worker...Top intangibles.

Weaknesses:
Has some health concerns and durability is a major question mark...He struggles to shed blockers...Has an inconsistent motor...Can use his hands better...Is not overly stout at the point...Is not real powerful and his good weight room strength does not always translate to the field...He never really had a breakout campaign.

Notes:
Missed the majority of his senior season with a ruptured biceps tendon but put off surgery for a week so he could help his team in a big game against Florida...Does everything well but doesn't really stand out in any one area...Might also project to defensive end in a 3-4 scheme...The Volunteers have a strong pro tradition when it comes to defensive tackles and Harrell will attempt to follow in the footsteps of John Henderson, Shaun Ellis, Darwin Walker, Rashad Moore and Jesse Mahelona.

Round #3: OG Manuel Ramierez, Texas Tech – Praised for his run blocking. I love running. We are a perfect match.

Strengths:
Massive with a huge frame...Incredibly strong and powerful...Stout at the point of attack and holds his ground...Once he locks on the battle is over...Is quick for his size...Tough and extremely physical...He can be a dominant run blocker...Durable with a lot of experience...Hard worker and team leader with excellent intangibles.

Weaknesses:
Is not overly athletic...Not very mobile or agile in space...Is only an average pass blocker despite a lot of reps...Short arms...Stamina is an issue late in games...Will have to adjust to a pro offense after playing in such a unique system in college.

Notes:
Strongest member of the team with a bench press of 550 lbs...Quite the physical specimen...He is not flashy but you know what you are getting...Will be limited to playing inside at the next level and his best fit will be with a run orientated team.

Round #4: WR Aundrae Allison, East Carolina. He has good speed and could turn into a real nice #3 WR.

Strengths:
A smooth athlete...Ball skills, balance and body control are superb...Has excellent hands and makes both the routine and tough catches...Speed is good, albeit not great, but he plays faster than he times and has a burst...Very elusive and runs well after the catch...A deep threat who can stretch the field vertically...Will work across the middle and in traffic...Very productive...Has potential as a return man.

Weaknesses:
Not a great route runner and needs to pay more attention to detail...Not much of a blocker and isn't very physical or aggressive...Takes plays off and work ethic is a question...He only has two years of DI experience...Has some durability concerns.

Notes:
Prefers to go by "Drae"...Considered coming out after his junior season...A JUCO All-American at Georgia Military Academy who officially enrolled at East Carolina in Jan. of '05...Might not project to be a true #1 receiver at the pro level but can be an excellent #2 option...Doesn't get a lot of attention but he has quietly emerged as a top pro prospect and how high he goes may surprise most casual observers.

Round #5: DT Paul Soliai,Utah. At 6’4” and 344 LBS he has great size and potential for a NT in a 3-4. With Washington’s looming retirement this kid could split time nicely with Shaun Smith in 2008 and 2009. As a bonus, he’s Somoan, which automatically makes him a complete bad-ass.

Strengths:
Has fantastic size with a huge frame and terrific bulk...Extremely strong and stout at the point...He is pretty athletic...Moves well and has good range...Can take on multiple blockers...Can really stuff the run...Still developing...Has a ton of upside.

Weaknesses:
Extremely raw and has only played the position for a couple of years...Not much of a pass rusher...Conditioning and stamina are concerns...Runs hot and cold...Is not quick or explosive and lacks a burst...Intelligence / Character may be issues.

Notes:
Native of American Samoa...Mother played softball for San Francisco State...JUCO transfer from Coffeyville Community College in Kansas where he was a 1st Team All-American offensive guard...Began his career with the Utes as an o-lineman as well...A potential 3-4 nose tackle...He is still far from a finished product but there is big potential here and he has all the physical tools you look for...Boom or Bust.

Round #6: TE Anthony Pudewell, Nevada. As previously stated, we’ll need a guy to develop to replace Dinkins. This kid is noted for blocking. Think goal line power sets. Round 6 guys rarely make it, this kid could be a nice 3rd TE.

Strengths:
Excellent blocker...Very tough...Has reliable hands...Smart...Hard worker with a great motor...Aggressive and never gives up on a play...Runs hard...Uses good leverage...Decent target in the short passing game...A team leader and captain.

Weaknesses:
Timed speed is well below average...He was never very productive...Not a great athlete and isn't very quick or explosive...Does not run very good routes...Not a deep threat...Marginal bal skills...Has some durability concerns...Limited upside.

Notes:
Redshirted his first year due to injury...Has a history of shoulder problems...The type who doesn't have the goods physically but gets by thanks to his top-notch intangibles...He'll never be a star but could be a nice backup / blocking specialist.

Round #7: DT Conrad Bolston, Maryland. He is too slow and has no pass rush. Nice thing about the 3-4 with our LB is this kid can absorb blocks and OL can have a tough time getting by him. The 3-4 is built off guys absorbing blocks. These picks are typically irrelevant, but every once in a while you get that diamond. (See Colston, and I also see Justin Hamilton fitting that bill). Will this guy be a diamond? Odds are against him as are against all 7th rounders.

Strengths:
He has good size and bulk with long arms and the frame to get bigger still...Very strong...Plays with excellent leverage...Stout at the point...Does a nice job versus the run...A decent bull rusher who will get a push...Can occupy multiple blockers.

Weaknesses:
Does not have a very good motor...Just isn't much of a pass rusher...Instincts and awareness are sub par...Is not a great athlete...Lacks quickness and a burst...He doesn't have nimble feet..Struggles to shed blocks...Limited pass rush repertoire.

Notes:
Was also an outstanding wrestler in high school who went 48-4 with 44 pins as a junior...Does not possess any standout attributes...Probably won't ever be more than a backup at the pro level...Still raw and he's basically a mauler and grappler.

*Scouting reports taken from - http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/rankings/qb.html


Now that I’ve given my draft explanation on who I picked, it’s time to reset the depth chart. You would not believe how difficult it was the first time around. Now I have to re-arrange it one more time before we can play in 2007.




Special Teams:
Kicker – Phil Dawson
Punter – Dave Zastidul
Long snapper – Ryan Pntbriand
KR/PR – Josh Cribbs

PUP list: Bentley and Baxter. If they are ready by week 7, we can place one of our CBs on IR to protect him (if he’s worthy) and drop Andruzzi if he’s still really weak and move Mckinney to G depth. However, due to their injuries severity, I’m placing them on IR.

Players cut: Kelly Butler, Lennie Friedman, Nick Eason and Ethan Kelley
Practice squad: Babatunde Oshinowho, Anthony Pudewell, Conrad Bolston, Kendrick Mosley, Lang Campbell, Chris Barclay, Anthony Perkins and Fred Matua

My choices to build a winning franchise lead me to upgrade the trenches. The players I cut were low grade depth. Some of you are thinking, “Butler has the potential to be good.” Now ask yourself, who would you rather have as a back-up, veteran Ryan Tucker or inexperienced Kelly Butler? Looking long-term I tried to infuse youth where it was needed preparing for future retirement so that these guys get at least one year of tutoring under solid vets.

Here again were the weakest parts of our team and how I attempted to build the future and turn a weakness into a strength.

1. Offensive line – Choosing Thomas gave me great possibilities for the future of this line. I added a 10 year LT, the hardest thing to find in the NFL. Shuffling Shaffer to the right side drops Tucker to depth where he belongs. Steinbach can continue to tutor Sowells and Andruzzi can tutor Ramierez. The line is also set up to protect the rookies. Steinbach is a solid vet that can help Thomas and Ramirez is sandwiched between Fraley and Shaffer; 2 solid veterans. Our back-ups have improved greatly as they have starting experience. We took away some major weak spots in Butler, Friedman and Coleman effectively making a nice front 5 foundation for the offense. Nat Dorsey is still a glaring weak spot, but you can’t do it all in one off-season. If Thomas were to get hurt, Shaffer can go back to LT and Tucker put in at RT. Age wise, the oldest starter is 27. Finally, we can get continuity and build chemistry where it’s desperately needed. Two rookies on a line is a little scary, but we are looking at the future – not looking to win next year. Don’t take the last line the wrong way. We want to win next year, but in the real world it is a building process. Remember, the goal is building a tradition of a winning franchise.

2. Defensive line – Once again, got rid of 2 weak spots and looked towards the future. I believe Fraser has great tools and is marvelous for depth. He truly can end up a solid starter – but my plans are still depth for him. Roye and Washington are 1 to 2 years from retirement. Washington can tutor Soliai and S. Smith in the NT position and Roye and R. Smith can tutor Justin Harrell and continue to help Fraser. I’ve peeled off a couple band-aids and added strength to our rotation on the d-line. It leaves us with a brighter future. Is it fixed? By no means, it’s going to take another year to really make it a strength. But I’ve started to push it in the right direction.

3. Running Back – Untouched. The draft didn’t unfold so that I could take care of this weakness. A 4th or 5th round project is better served elsewhere. We need top tier talent at the RB position. It’s too rare to find in rounds 4 and 5, aside from that we drafted Harrison in round 5 last year. Players take time to develop. Drafting a RB again in the middle round would make us Butch Davis. To tell you how hard that is for me, Walter Payton and Tony Dorsett are my two all-time favorite football players. I worship the ground Payton walked on. One day I’ll meet him in heaven. I am a running back fanatic. However, we need to build that foundation.

4. Wide receiver – Yeah, I know – I added more youth to the youth. The knock on Tim Carter are his hands, I think he’s a one year Northcutt replacement. When your team is in as bad of shape as ours was in 2005, you need some 1 year guys to fill holes. I think Cribbs is better suited for special teams. Allison could be the #3 we wanted. Especially since JJ will be 33.

5. Tight ends – Picked a project known for blocking. Could spell the end of Dinkins in 2008. Could be a bust.

6. Cornerback – I have a feeling I angered many people by “ignoring” the CB position. We upgraded the d-line, have solid S and a lot of youth at CB so I felt it was unnecessary to touch the position this year. Last year we had some bad corner play, but we had worse DL play and our top 3 CB COMBINED to play 12 games due to injury. We have also picked a CB in the draft the past 2 years, to reiterate – picking the same position 3 years in a row is how you Butch a draft.

7. Quarterback – I’ll get killed by many for not touching the QB. Instead of telling yourself “Soup’s enamored with Frye,” think. “Soup did a nice job of setting up the team for our 1st round QB next year. The o-line can no longer be used as the truth an excuse”

8. Safeties, Linebackers, Kicker, Punter and Long snapper – Didn’t need to touch it.

We are now set-up to play football in 2007. Low and behold, here is our schedule.

2007 Schedule

Sep 9 Pittsburgh 1:00pm
Sep 16 Cincinnati 1:00pm
Sep 23 @Oakland 4:05pm
Sep 30 Baltimore 1:00pm
Oct 7 @New England 1:00pm
Oct 14 Miami 1:00pm
Week 7 BYE
Oct 28 @St. Louis 1:00pm
Nov 4 Seattle 4:05pm
Nov 11 @Pittsburgh 1:00pm
Nov 18 @Baltimore 1:00pm
Nov 25 Houston 1:00pm
Dec 2 @Arizona 4:05pm
Dec 9 @N.Y. Jets 4:15pm
Dec 16 Buffalo 1:00pm
Dec 23 @Cincinnati 1:00pm
Dec 30 San Francisco 1:00pm

I believe in my team that I’ve started. To make a safe bet, I’m going to say we go 7-9. We have the 7th toughest schedule in the NFL based off last years standings. The team progressed and was in the games. Lost some heartbreakers and won some surprises. All in all, we saw dramatic improvement in year 3 of the 3-4 and Chud’s offense scored 19 PPG.



2008 Off-season

First, I believe we will be losing 3 players to retirement. This gives us immediate holes to full when targeting our off season.

NT – Ted Washington – he’ll be 40.
LB – Willie McGinest – he’ll be 36 and has been hampered by injuries as of late.
DE – Orpheus Roye – he’ll be 35 and I think his knees are getting the best of him as they’ve been a problem the past 2 years.


Cleveland Browns potential free agents:

QB Ken Dorsey (26)
QB: Derek Anderson (23)
RB – Jamal Lewis (28)
RB: – Jason Wright (25)
OT: Nat Dorsey (24)
TE – Steve Heiden (31)
CB – Daven Holly (25)
CB: – Jereme Perry (26)
LB: David McMillan (26)
LB: Chaun Thompson (27)

We just went from 53 players down to 41. We have to assess free agency and the value of our own players and how they came along in 2007. Now it’s time for (drum roll please) a look at the roster. Bear with me, this is tedious reading I know. But this is all part of building a franchise to win long term.




Special Teams:
Kicker – Phil Dawson
Punter – Dave Zastidul
Long snapper – Ryan Pntbriand
KR/PR – Josh Cribbs



2008 Potential NFL Free Agents:

Let me preface by saying I could not find this list anywhere on the internet. I had to use the best resource I could. Forgive me, but it’s Madden ’07. They are usually really good with years left on the contract. I did this fs a last resort and I only pulled out notable players. Not all will be available, but it’s interesting for the sake of the article.


QB: Rex Grossman
QB: Billy Volek
QB: Tony Romo
RB: Correll Buckhalter
RB: Julius Jones
RB: Michael Pittman
FB: Tony Richardson
LG: Alan Faneca
LG: Dan Buenning
LG: Tutan Reyes
RG Johnathon Welborn
RG: Chris Villarrial
RG: Elton Brown
C: Nick Hardwick
OT: Flozell Adams
OT: Bryant Mckinnie
OT: Travelle Wharton
OT: Stocker McDougal
WR: Kerry Colbert
WR: Terry Glenn
WR: Devry Henderson
WR: Jabar Gaffney
WR: Reche Caldwell
WR: Brandon Jones
WR: Bryant Johnson
WR: Patrick Crayton
TE: Chris Cooley
TE: Stephen Alexander
TE Ben Troupe
TE: Bo Scaife
DT: Randy Starks
DT: Jimmy Kennedy
DT: Ryan Sims
DT: Pat Williams
DE: Terrell Suggs
DE: Ty Warren
DE: Julius Peppers
DE: Justin Smith
DE: Simeon Rice
DE: Igor Olschansky
LB: Clark Haggans
LB: Shelton Quarles
LB: Carlos Dansby
LB: Mark Simoneau
CB: Nathan Vasher
CB: Keiwan Ratliff
CB: Marcus Trufant
CB: Dominique Foxworth
CB: Rodne Barber
CB: Eric Green
CB: Quentin Jammer
CB: Aaron Glenn
S Bhawha Jue
S: Keith Davis
S: Troy Plamalu
S: Eugene Wilson
S: Bob Sanders
S: Matt Bowen





2008 NFL draft top prospects:

Obviously this list will change and needs will change as the year goes by. Go to: http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/top64.php?draftyear=2008 It gives top 5 at each position and top 64 overall.

I’ve had all the fun so far. Now comes the interactive part. Make the following assumptions:

QB: Charlie Frye threw for 2800 yards 15 TDs and 12ints. 63% completion. Made some dumb throws and still had tendencies to run outside the pocket. His overall decision making improved. He’ll never be a pro-bowl QB, but has the ability to lead and be a game manager.

OL: They got stronger as the year went on. Bentley is now healthy.
RB: Jamal Lewis had his power, but lost a step. 1100 yards and 6 TDs.
CB: Holly had another solid year, 5 more picks. Baxter comes back, but he’s only 80% of what he was.
TE: Pudewell has developed nicely and is an excellent blocker. Do you cut Dinkins and replace him with Pudewell? Dinkins is valuable to your special teams.

You have the 13th pick in the NFL draft fue to your 7-9 record. How do you rank the weaknessesin our roster? Who do you re-sign on the Browns? Who do you cut? Who do you target in free agency? Who do you target in the draft? What would you do to continue to build the winning franchise and turn the corner in 2008 for the playoffs?



Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 164
T
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 164
Soup...I gotta ask, how long did that take?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Quote:

Now comes the interactive part. Make the following assumptions:

QB: Charlie Frye threw for 2800 yards 15 TDs and 12ints. 63% completion. Made some dumb throws and still had tendencies to run outside the pocket. His overall decision making improved. He’ll never be a pro-bowl QB, but has the ability to lead and be a game manager.

OL: They got stronger as the year went on. Bentley is now healthy.
RB: Jamal Lewis had his power, but lost a step. 1100 yards and 6 TDs.
CB: Holly had another solid year, 5 more picks. Baxter comes back, but he’s only 80% of what he was.
TE: Pudewell has developed nicely and is an excellent blocker. Do you cut Dinkins and replace him with Pudewell? Dinkins is valuable to your special teams.





The land of make believe?? Pretend this happened? How about we see what happens in 2007, and THEN talk about the 2008 draft?

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
a few nights, approx 8 hours

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

Quote:

Now comes the interactive part. Make the following assumptions:

QB: Charlie Frye threw for 2800 yards 15 TDs and 12ints. 63% completion. Made some dumb throws and still had tendencies to run outside the pocket. His overall decision making improved. He’ll never be a pro-bowl QB, but has the ability to lead and be a game manager.

OL: They got stronger as the year went on. Bentley is now healthy.
RB: Jamal Lewis had his power, but lost a step. 1100 yards and 6 TDs.
CB: Holly had another solid year, 5 more picks. Baxter comes back, but he’s only 80% of what he was.
TE: Pudewell has developed nicely and is an excellent blocker. Do you cut Dinkins and replace him with Pudewell? Dinkins is valuable to your special teams.





The land of make believe?? Pretend this happened? How about we see what happens in 2007, and THEN talk about the 2008 draft?




The whole article is make-believe! Play along, have fun with it.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,199
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,199
Quote:

a few nights, approx 8 hours




impressive... long but good read! thanks for the hard work!


Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,599
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,599
Great effort.

Anybody who puts in that much effort deserves some props!!


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 786
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 786
I like the draft. I feel like Eric Wright will be our 2nd rounder though. and although i like the Thomas pick....i feel it will be Quinn and see him playing by mid-season.

I think Mckinney sends Anruzzi to the bench this year.

Baxter will make it back this year....just providing depth though.

The other Smith will be the NT stud that gives Teddy a rest.

WM will split time with Peek and make Mcmillian a casualty.

Its hard for me to WORK for 8 hours.

Good read!!!!!!


You dont have to win every game just the next one!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,861
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,861
It is a good read Soup.



But it's very hard to project that far ahead. Makes it hard to actually predict health factors that far ahead.

I mean injuries,trades,FA's,etc... can change these dynamics obver the course of a year. Look at last year. Bentley,Baxter,Tucker...........I think you see my point.

Just because we adress situations in the draft this year,it doesn't mean we won't find other pressing needs by the end of this season. I mean we can logicly deduce what positions will need to be filled next year by the positions we don't fill this year.

But a completly different set of circumstances will present themselves by this time next year and who knows where we'll stand then.

JMHO


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 890
W
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 890
Soup, I gotta be honest, I scrolled through the whole thing just to see how many people asked how long it took

I'll probably check it out later tonight, because I plan on being a GM some day and need the mighty Soup's advice


[Linked Image from i4.photobucket.com]

PRO-BOWLER!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

It is a good read Soup.



But it's very hard to project that far ahead. Makes it hard to actually predict health factors that far ahead.

I mean injuries,trades,FA's,etc... can change these dynamics obver the course of a year. Look at last year. Bentley,Baxter,Tucker...........I think you see my point.

Just because we adress situations in the draft this year,it doesn't mean we won't find other pressing needs by the end of this season. I mean we can logicly deduce what positions will need to be filled next year by the positions we don't fill this year.

But a completly different set of circumstances will present themselves by this time next year and who knows where we'll stand then.

JMHO



Fully understood. I was trying to do it more as an exercize of "How does a GM work?" I put the set of circumstances in for fun. Just wanted to see what people would do and how they view the idea of building a franchise. Getting people to look ahead. It's funny, I hated the 3rd round pick of Travis Wilson last year - said to myself "that's a useless pick." When assessing our talent, I now realize exactly why he made the pick. He wasn't looking at this past season at all. He was looking towards the future knowing Cutt was going to be gone, now we have to prepare for JJs retirement in a year or 2. It takes a blend of FA and draft. Just wanted to see other peoples different approaches.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
One thing I'd love to hear from people - I'd love to hear an in depth version of what you think of our weaknesses - in depth by player. It's fun to see different views. It's an overall position asessment. I think it's a fun direction to go for good discussion prior to the daft. In another forum this is in, I've learned a few interesting things that changed my views. A lot of times the board is filled with bickering, and round and round arguments - this is a place where I think we can learn different views openly.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,364
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,364
Well thought out and well very speculative, which as Shep and others have pointed out can't be helped or avoided because of unknown future problems and circumstances. You did a lot of work on this and for sharing it with us, I thank you, Soup. It's too late now for me to read it in depth and give my critique but maybe later when I have more time to think it over more clearly.

As you can see by my sig - who I want us to draft but I'm not the person with the responsibility of building the team and it is easy to sit here at the keyboard and type all kinds of wishes and such, with no worry re backlash or evening maybe being fired and replaced. I said back in the 2005 that this draft would define the acumen of Phil as being a promising General Manager and I wish him all the best this year and in the future.

He's got to be under a lot of pressure and I really don't envying him, salary and all. Anyway, good job again, Soup.....nice to read post with intelligent ideas and logic behind those ideas.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,660
A couple of comments.

First, an excellent job.

I think Tucker is better than Shaffer.

I like Fraser as much as the next person, but unless he improves against the run, he will be nothing but a situational pass rusher.

I do not see Dorsey making the team next year.

I still see the Browns drafting a CB and a RB by round 5. I could be wrong, but my feeling is that Jamal Lewis may only be a one year player. My hunch here is that the Browns may draft Peterson and go OG in Round 2.

I have not seen much af Ramirez, but he played for pass happy Texas Tech and is portrayed as a road grader. Personally I think the Browns are going after the 300 lb OG that can move in space. If Grubbs and Blayloick are gone, I like Sears with the second round selection and DL for the thrid.


Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,795
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,795
Just a few things for now. I see Harrell going be for we pick in the second.Not sure we want Thomas but I hope so. Rameriz does not seem to fit the style of Oline we are going for not to mention he played all year with some kind of damage to his pattella.If we get rid of a tackle this year I believe it will be Dorsey and not Butler. There might actually be a chance that Tucker and Shaffer both start on the right side.

You did a lot of work and it is interesting. I hate drafting another reciever in the fourth and against drafting any tight end.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Haven't read through it all yet, I don't claim to know my Xs and Os, and I'm certainly no winning franchise builder, but shouldn't the offense face the defense?



[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Okay... took me 8 hours to read it and complete the assignment, but good job. Your assessment of the team is concise, can't disagree with much you've said, given I share the same biases. Though I do think you underestimate the state of the CB position and overestimate the QB position, I also think Wright can be a good 3rd back and Dawson could become a bigger question mark, but overall I agree with your assessment.

Re: the draft. You assume Russell & Quinn go 1-2 and that is a huge assumption. In keeping with the desire to build a winning franchise drafting one of them instead of Thomas also makes sense given the areas of need you pointed out regarding the O-line, which was RG & RT. Also I would have to take Blalock if he's there or Grubbs if he's not in the second, and then find my end in the third Pitcock Maybe or Alma-Francis... and that's just because I think our need is greater at OG and hopefully we can come away with a day one starter in the 2nd round. I would also be looking for a CB in the fourth. I see your logic but I would be willing to give Cribbs another year. When you get to those later rounds, (5-7,) you have to go BPA, IMO or you're just peeking in the wind. Though I would be looking for a good, cold weather, wind experienced kicker. If Winslow is healthy, I think we're okay at TE, at least for a year.

Shedule, yup, tough... 7-9 would be great given that schedule and where we developmentally. Good to see our O's PPg creep up near 21, because we have to be there or better to become a playoff team consistently.

2008... Retirements are probably right. I would add that Tucker might be gone and Baxter could be as well, though I hope not.

Interactive: I took Quinn in '07 and kept Frye and Anderson, (sorry, it's my team,) and would resign Anderson or find another 3rd. I sign Holly to a multi year contract if he's playing well, and I resign Lewis to a new contract, (assuming he had a decent year,). I draft an LT in RD 1, (technically, drafting Thomas isn't one of your assumptions, besides, I took Quinn. ). I look for a stud RB, DL or DE/OLB to draft but go BPA for the most part. I probably continue to fill areas of need that were either carried over or identified during the draft in free agency to assist that philosophy. It's really hard to know who will actually be there in FA or who will be where on the draft board, besides it's late and too tired to give it that much thought.

So I guess my future line up looks something like:

Edwards, #4 WR (07, or 08 BPA, UDFA, FA ). Maybe Carter surprises me, but not counting on it.
'08 LT (Sam Baker maybe, or Kirk Barton?) Rd 1, Dorsey
Steinbach, Sowells, (unless I can upgrade draft or FA)
LCB, Fraley
Quinn, Frye, Anderson? or whoever.
Jamal Lewis, Tashard Choice? Harrison (or less likely Wright), Vickers
Blalock, McKinney
Shaffer, Kelly Butler
Winslow, Dinkins, '08 BPA, UDFA, or '08 FA
Wilson, Joe J. Cribbs

Bodden, Holly
Peek, '08 BPA, UDFA, FA
Alma-Francis, Fasier
Davis, Williams
Shaun Smith, 07 or 08 BPA or '08 FA
DQ, Chaun Thompson, (yup I keep him)
Robaire Smith, ('08 BPA FA)
Wimbley, McMillan or '08 BPA or FA.
Minter, '07 RD 4 Draft Pick, '08 BPA or FA
Jones, Hamilton
Pool, Adams or Baxter, or '08 BPA or FA

Kicker draft or FA, Zastudil, Pontibrand, Cribbs.

Even though it's difficult to pick specific players with any kind of accuracy the message is clear, we're getting to the point where we're building a younger more talented team through the draft (more so) and FA (when possible) and fielding more quality players up front, by '09 we should be winning games and drafting BPA almost exclusively and only taking FAs who will vastly improve a position.



[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,887
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,887
Thanks for all the hard work Soup,,, and Good Job! Come on up from the Burgh and have a beer with us during camp,, we have a kinda unofficial Dawg Talk Day in Berea.... Seeing GM there is almost worth the drive!

As I said in a PM to you the other day, I like the first three rounds of your draft and how both lines are addressed.. If it came down like that, I have no problem at all..

And it's not that I didn't like your other picks, I just don't know much about them so they may be great....

I do believe that out TE's on offense and out LB's on Defense are the strength of those units..

I also believe that we should stick with Charlie for another year to see what happens.

All in all, great read man,,, lots of hard work and thought went into this and as Peen said,, you deserve props for the effort!


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Whew!, I'm tired just from reading that much. That had to take some time.
What I liked:
Soup considered the players age as a factor for the future of the franchise and
considered that the CBs and other young players could be allowed to develop on the field. He also gave three picks to the DL. I hope for at least two b/c of the geriatric factor he mentioned. He gave Phil props for the Wilson pick. He also allowed back-ups to be just that and not discount their important roles as depth players just b/c they are not starter quality.
What I disagree with:
I see that Butler is considered a better option than Dorsey, not the other way around,but I could be wrong. I think that if Thomas and Ramirez are drafted both Tucker and Andruzzi will be cut b/c of money and age. I don't know how Bentley will effect the draft. If he comes back, what will happen to Fraley? Will Phil keep Fraley at center, move Bentley to guard and not draft a guard this year? I'm not as optimistic about Fraser for the reason someone else already mentioned.

If Detroit trades down, so someone else can get C.J., your entire OL scenario could be toast b/c Brady Quinn will likely be a Brown and not Thomas. But anyone's guess is as good, or bad, as mine. April 28th can't get here soon enough.I'm just wondering how long it will take for a beat writer to publish an article similar to this.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,013
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,013
SOUP...

E for effort ...i agree with you on the broad idea that people shouldn't always think so short-term...but enough of the boring agreements ...

Quote:

Wright was decent, but I don’t think he’s good enough to be a 3rd RB.




well, what exactly are you looking for in a 3rd string RB?

Quote:

5. Tight ends...7. Quarterback




i have other disagreements with your weakness rankings, but this one takes the cake...i knew some folks had a crush on Frye, but WOW!...he's got a list of problems that go beyond the poor OL, and we've got probably one of the best TE units in the league...age 30 may be the time you start to THINK about the position, but not when your mind is burdened with thoughts of Frynderson repeating their 06 QB performance...look, if you don't want to take a QB this year, fine...but to say it's something to be addressed after the TE position, well, that's just

Quote:

Round #4: WR Aundrae Allison, East Carolina.




while i understand the questions surrounding our WR core (and that as of today, we think it's not so good), our #3/4 is already made up of developmental guys, not to mention the attitude of Edwards(same attitude of Allison, BTW)...how does drafting another later-round guy with upside really upgrade this unit?...IF you want to upgrade this unit, you take an available Calvin Johnson...better yet, leave this part of the roster alone for a year and assess the situation when we know a bit more about the progression of Edwards, Wilson, and Cribbs...

Quote:

I have a feeling I angered many people by “ignoring” the CB position. We upgraded the d-line, have solid S and a lot of youth at CB so I felt it was unnecessary to touch the position this year.




i certainly don't have a problem with bypassing CB by getting OL/DL...BUT...you've got guys in the 1st 3 rounds that have a 50-50 chance of being off the board by our picks...contrary to the opinion of some board experts, there's different ways to build a winning franchise, and if, say Harrel is gone, but Revis or Ross is there, they'd be a very solid choice...yes, CBs look better/worse based upon the play of the front7, but that goes both ways...if you've got corners you can trust to lock a guy down in man from time to time, you can put in more aggressive blitz packages for those LBs...

Quote:

Make the following assumptions:





i'm surprised that those assumptions seemed to all work out according to your beliefs ...but i'll play...

08 FA...there're SO many variables, it's hard to guess, but...

kinda depends on where Charlie's 2800 yds and 15TDs broke down, but assuming the bulk went to Edwards, Winslow, with Jurevicious getting up there, i'd have a long look at a youngish vet like Keary Colbert...he might demand starter $, so i wouldn't try to outbid anyone, but if he's too pricy for Carolina and not offered big cash elsewhere...

if Michael Turner wasn't traded this offseason, i buy the guy in 08...he'll be costly, but he's the only top tier i go hard after...with Jamal on the downside, put Turner in a situation like he had in SD, excepting that HE becomes the starter, with about 75% of the carries...

i also look at a guy like Brandon McKinney from the Chargers, though he's not on your list...even if Ted were gone, getting McKinney, we'd have 2 decent NTs, allowing us to upgrade with a stud via the draft or stand pat if noone presented good value...

08 draft...

well, at 13 you aren't gonna be in contention for a franchse QB, so we've ignored QB for 2 years, not just 1, assuming we win that many games in 07(which i doubt, even with your 'dream scenario')...

round 1, CB DeJuan Tribble...as i said, good CBs help the LBs...
round 2, DT(NT) Marcus Harrison...or DT(DE) DeMario Pressley...based on your retirements, we need DL...

your site only goes to 64 prospects, but i'd look for some combo of RT, OLB, S in 3 and 4...


Browns fans are born with it...
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Thanks very much for your reply. This is exactly what I was hoping more people would do. One thing Pitdawg tipped me to in a PM has been repeated approx 3 times. Ramierez isn't our type of G, we are probably looking for a 300LB G that can move. Something I learned through posting this thread. I really wanted it for this purpose. Now I now it makes great sense in the eyes of the Browns to pass on Ramierez.

As for Grubbs/Blalock - I stated in the article that the only reason they weren't picked by me is that I see Blalock going late round 1 and Grubbs being gone prior to us, possibly Detroit or TB.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Thanks for the reply, as for my assumptions working out so well in '08 - it was just to be funny more than anything. I think 7-9 is very doable. You assume that Frye isn't the answer, which is as big of an assumption as he is the answer. We just view him different. As for TE and QB, age was afactor. I wasn't targeting QB in the first 3 rounds (no point in replacing a 3rd round QB with 1 year starting experience with a 3rd round QB) so factoring in age- TE jumped up even though they are our strongest unit.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,833
In regard to the tight ends. How many will be kept on the squad? Only one FB is listed on the roster . Will that change or will the offense rely heavily on two TEs? I'm also concerned that when Winslow's contract expires he will ask for waay too much money or want to go to a more "sexy" franchise. What about Krause, wouldn't he be as good a a 7th?Just some thoughts...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,861
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,861
Okay,I'll give this a shot even though I can't stick with one scenario,no matter who's it is,on how this all pans out.

First,let's look at the "contraversial" CB position. What we do have is some youth and potential. We have one CB in the "pretty good range". What we don't have is a complimentary in the "pretty good range" while the youth develops and plays situationaly. So there is a need for talent infusion here. But where? I mean is a third or fourth round draft pick going to net us that player for now?

I don't see that. So unless you see a guy drop out of the first round that Phil sees as BPA there,I don't see us drafting anything that would appear substantialy better than the young talent we have developing now. There might be someone out there that would be an upgrade in the third or fourth rounds,but I can't really think of one. So I think we either use the second round at CB,or not really worry about the position at all in the draft.

Another thing we need to look at is which positions will be more practical to fill via FA market than be forced to spend a high draft pick on. While Steinbach was expencive,think about what a FA LT of that quality would cost?

So while you can state needs,some can be filled at a reasonable level via FA. And with Winslow,your back-up is a blocking,bruising type TE with decent hands. From a financial standpoint,those can be attained at a far more reasonable price in the FA market than many other needs.

We've seen proven running backs with upside go for reasonable prices compared with other positions as of late. Not that I advocate that as a long term solution,a very productive back given a good OL,can be had on the open market for less than an arm and a leg.

So I can see leaving your options open at TE and RB untill next year as far as any major move goes. But I think you see my premise. There are positions that can be filled elsewhere without first day picks.

So I think that franchise LT's and franchise QB's you can only get with high investments. I do think at some point that you draft a franchise RB. But your odds of success with mid first round picks at RB are far greater than LT's and QB's. So I think your odds of finding a franchise RB at #13 next year would be better than at LT or QB.

So I think it will depend on if Savage is sold on Quinn as that franchise QB. If Savage is sold on Quinn,IMO,he will be our pick. If they're not 100% sold on Quinn,I think Thomas will be the pick. Savage stated plainly that major investments (plural) were going to be made on the OL,still,if he's fully confident in Quinn,I see him being the pick.

So,just for the hell of it,I'm going to say Quinn in round 1 and a Sears/Blaylock in round 2. I don't see signing Steinbach and a second tier G as addressing the line with major investments. So if we go QB in round 1,I see OL in round 2.

Now our DL is in serious need as well,so I can see OL in 2,DL in three,or the other way around. We do need an infusion of youth there without a doubt.

Next year? That would still leave these issues. LT,CB,RB. Again,we have seen how LT's and CB's are VERY expencive in the FA market,but you also need that franchise RB. And the whole problem that I just can't come to grips with,is unless I have next year to see the players coming out,I have no idea of which direction to go.


I think we have to see what talent is there,consider the risk factors and go from there. If I see another Marcus McNeill,I might say go for the RB in round 1 and get the McNeill clone in round 2 next year. It's far too early for me to judge where I would go at this point.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Thank you. Very well thought out post. To everyone - PLEASE more posts like Pitdawg's! Detailed explanations, I'm learning a lot from this thread he brings up great points invloving LT and QB. More to ponder for the next 14 days.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
I’ll chip in my two cents as a morning meeting got cancelled so I have a few minutes to burn.

Current Assessment of the Browns

I won’t out and out disagree with how you rank our priorities. I think you are very close to the point on many of them. However, I believe it’s a little more complex than ranking them as we are VERY weak on several levels. I think our lack of depth and starting quality makes for some equally important trouble spots.

And believe it or not, I’m actually coming around to thinking that our offensive line might not be the most of our worries. Actually right now, I believe our weakest spot is CB. I agree that the play of our front 7 drastically affects the quality of coverage we need from our secondary, but I don’t think one is more important than the other. The fact is, you need quality corners on the field just as much as you need pressure on the QB. I find it difficult to rank one above the other.

I think the moves to retain Fraley and sign Steinbach are both huge pluses for our O-Line. Our guards were the main problem on our line last year. Pressure from the pass rush came up the gut as our guards folded like paper against physical DLs. They also were unable to open any type of gap for our running game to get off the ground at all. Coleman looked horrible this year and Andruzzi has continued his slide. Honestly, I’d say our best guard we had last year was Lennie Friedman.

I think our O-Line will be drastically improved if we can find a new starting guard in the draft on first day. I’ve started to think that the ideal situation for us in the first round is if we could trade down to the 20s and grab Blaylock as I think he will be an absolute terror at guard. BUT, that’s just a thought…we’re at 3 fr a reason after all..we need some elite players on this squad.

The Draft

Your selections are:

1 Joe Thomas, LT
2 Justin Harrell, DT/DE
3 Manuel Ramirez. G
4 Aundrae Allison WR
5 Paul Soliai, NT
6 Anthony Pudewell, TE
7 Conrad Bolston, DT

First and foremost, I will say that if this panned out, I’d be a happy kid on draft weekend. It is, by all accounts, a nice looking draft.

But, what use is a response post if I don’t disagree with you here and there…

Thomas in the first- Of course, I’m not going to disagree with. Unfortunately, I have this nasty hunch we end up with a QB this year. That’s not what I want mind you…but a gut feeling.

Second round- Harrell is a good pick here…But obviously a lot of the consideration here goes towards who is available. Top of the second round, in my view, is a great spot to pick up a guard. However, although there are some nice guards available, our somewhat sweet spot in round two presents a problem of value.

If Blaylock happens to slide, he’s our pick…no questions asked. I’m not 100% sold on Grubbs and I don’t think the remainder of the cast is worth a high second.

So option 1= Blaylock.

Second scenario is D-Line pick…. Harrell is a player..no doubt about it. However, I’ve gotten very interested in Tank Tyler. For a guy who was being slammed for lack of conditioning, he looked SICK at the combine. The guy is a specimen. NC State has been spitting out quality D-Linemen lately and I think he may be the latest in a series.

Round 3- Ramirez. Not crazy about this pick. I think this guy is just pure power and nothing special skill wise. I think by the time we hit round 3, we can get equitable guard talent in round 4. I’d rather look at Corner here.

Your second day picks, I’m all fine with except for Paul Solalai. Call it Steve Fifita syndrome. But you are right in that we need to come out of this draft with at least two potential D-Line guys for the future.

One other note on the second day, although you list Dawson as far down on the priority list, was I the only one that was less than impressed with him last year? Some of his misses were stuff that he is normally automatic on. I wouldn’t mind seeing us use our 7th on a kicker or bringing in a UDFA and having an open competition in camp.

The 2007 Browns

So looking at your revised depth chart, things are looking a lot happier.

O-Line- Having both Thomas and a draft day guard in make all the difference. However, I disagree with your cuts and resulting depth.

I keep Friedman over Andruzzi. Andruzzi is done. Friedman is more versatile, younger and cheaper. Joe had a nice little career but honestly his body has broken down now. He simply can’t hold the line anymore, much less open holes or get to the second level.

Keeping Tucker as depth. It’s a nice idea. But how do we justify paying a backup that sum of money. If Tucker is not a starter, he needs to be traded or cut loose. He is still a good lineman but he has started to slide a bit, particularly in his mobility. Basically, if we draft Joe Thomas, either Shaffer or Tucker has to be shown the door.

D-Line- I like Simon Fraser. He is a guy with a lot of hustle and is underrated talent wise. Unfortunately, I have my doubts as to whether he is a 3-4 Lineman. He simply does not seem to have the power to eat blocks and hold the line. Unless he works on his power, I trade him to a 4-3 team (where I think he would do great) and keep either Kelley or Eason as depth at DE.

Cornerback- Well I’m not MAD at ya Soup…but I think neglecting the CB position could be a fatal error. I think our deficiencies in our secondary have been somewhat covered up by the fact that its so damn easy to run on us. Bodden is starter material, but after that, we get slim. I like Holly and think he has potential. Minter is still unknown. Perry has physical skills but bites on the doublemove worse than any CB I’ve ever seen. Wright, according to Skins fans, has earned the nickname “Toast”. And who knows if Bax will ever see the field again. I think, at the very least here, we need some young depth in the hope of developing a decent corner or perhaps striking gold.

My big question, in looking at the future, is what we’re doing with our running back.

With acquiring Lewis on a one year deal, it seems like Savage is essentially giving him a “try-out” and a chance to prove he can still be a franchise back. If he does show that he still has the goods, one would assume we’d re-sign him and we’re set for at least a few years.

But if he doesn’t come through, what then? I’m guessing it’s a matter of FA running backs in 08 or we can pretty much guarantee our first round pick will be a RB.

Your questions

You have the 13th pick in the NFL draft fue to your 7-9 record. How do you rank the weaknessesin our roster? Who do you re-sign on the Browns? Who do you cut? Who do you target in free agency? Who do you target in the draft? What would you do to continue to build the winning franchise and turn the corner in 2008 for the playoffs?

Weaknesses- AS mentioned above, RB is most pressing if Jamal doesn’t pan out. If he does, I think our big trouble spot has to be cornerback. At 13, you have likely one of the top 2 prospects available.

Who to re-sign? Lewis (if he pans out), Wright, Holly, Heiden, Thompson

FA- Difficult to say obviously. Depends on where our weaknesses lie. I’d be tempted to look at elite CBs.

Draft- Same problem. At 13, I’d say RB and CB both have decent prospects. Might also look to another OLB as I don’t think Peek will be anything remarkable.

What do I continue to do? Don’t repeat our mistakes and ignore our trenches. I’d always be looking to add an O-Lineman on the first day.

That’s about it…. Just my two cents… (although due to the sheer quantity of text, I’ll bump myself up to a nickel)

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,331
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,331
Quote:

I’d say our best guard we had last year was Lennie Friedman.




I damn near choked on my lunch, knock that nonsense off

For those on this thread giving up on Tuck, the crow will be served after the season is over. I am taking orders now.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
I'd be happy to eat it.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
Quote:

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I’d say our best guard we had last year was Lennie Friedman.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I damn near choked on my lunch, knock that nonsense off




Sad I know...but really..who was better?

Andruzzi- Spent half his time being injured, the other half on his butt as people rolled over him,
Coleman- Had more flags on him than the damn United Nations
Matua- Don;t think he played.
Sowells- Same story.
Sims- Showed he was equally poor at guard and centre.

Friedman is not a starting quality guy. But he played better than the other cast of miscreants.... Which really does speak volumes for the cast of miscreants we put to flank Hank last season.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,331
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,331
Quote:

I'd be happy to eat it.




I'll be here to announce the serving time


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,331
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,331
Quote:

Sad I know...but really..who was better?




Nobody was better









But Coleman and Druzzi were not as putrid.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
What's he doing, completing this season at starting RT?


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
WOW ..never thought I'd see the day .. but when a man deserves credit a man deserves credit ... Soup .. this is the best thread ever .. any thread that can get Pit to admit that BQ is the man is one hell of a thread .. ..

i applaud your effort soup .. i dont agree with much of it but damm u did a nice job .. i wish i had the time to answer in the manner in witch it deserves ( a well thought out detailed assesment of my opinions on weaknesses ) ...

I seriously thought I;d never be able to or want to have an intelligent debate about football with U (well .. i would of course bring the bulk of intelligence ... . ) ... well u proved me wrong ... unfortunatly time wont allow me to respond ..

Quote:

I'm going to say Quinn in round 1




I'm gonna make that my signature ... Pit admits that BQ is DA MAN ... *doing happy happy joy joy dance* .. *LOL* ..




Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Soup Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

WOW ..never thought I'd see the day .. but when a man deserves credit a man deserves credit ... Soup .. this is the best thread ever .. any thread that can get Pit to admit that BQ is the man is one hell of a thread .. ..

i applaud your effort soup .. i dont agree with much of it but damm u did a nice job .. i wish i had the time to answer in the manner in witch it deserves ( a well thought out detailed assesment of my opinions on weaknesses ) ...

I seriously thought I;d never be able to or want to have an intelligent debate about football with U (well .. i would of course bring the bulk of intelligence ... . ) ... well u proved me wrong ... unfortunatly time wont allow me to respond ..

Quote:

I'm going to say Quinn in round 1




I'm gonna make that my signature ... Pit admits that BQ is DA MAN ... *doing happy happy joy joy dance* .. *LOL* ..



Thank you. I appreciate that. I think everyone on here knows something about the sport (even me on occasion), as I stated before, I think this idea is a great learning tool more than anything.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
U and I already talked about it ..lots of detail and effort..

But with the data you KNOW what the Browns need..lol..

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,861
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,861
Well you are oversimplifying and misquoting me a great deal Diam,but I think you can use the moral support at this juncture.


I do believe IF Phil is 100% sold on Quinn,he will be the pick. That's a big if,but we'll see.

IF Phil isn't 100% sold on Quinn,I see JT as the pick.

For some reason it sounds a little different when
I say it rather than you Diam. Why is that?



Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 844
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 844
Nice work Soup.... I'll play but in my own way. I'm not going to go into the 2008 season because there is too many unknown factors.

So I'll start by saying that I agree with you on the O line being the major weakness since 99. We need to continue to address the O line.

Then I think QB, RB, WR, and DL are all equally as much of a weakness or need. I mean we have not had a franchise type of QB since 99, we have only had 1 season with a decent running attack, our WR corp has never been above average and our DL has never been great either.

QB- we need a sure fire starter and a solid backup.

RB- we need a young stud RB to carry the load long term, same as QB.

WR- everybody thinks that our WR corp is solid but I'm not convinced of that. I mean B.E. is still a question mark, Wilson is inexperienced, Cribbs is a project, Carter is depth and with his injury prone past we don't even know how much we will really get out of him? So that leaves Joe J. our only solid WR but he will not be here for the long haul. So we still need to beef up our WR corp.

DL- our DL is aging and we need some youth so that they can eat blocks and get some push to allow our LB's, Safeties, and CB's to get blitz pressure and stop the running game of opponents.

CB- we have Bodden and Holly but we don't know how good Holly will top out at and the rest of our CB's are a question mark. So we need somebody to compliment Bodden so we can be solid enough to trust our CB unit to play man and allow us to blitz more often.

Now I'm going to toss one more position in the mix. H.C., yes I said it, H.C. I like RAC but hey, what have you done for me lately? Nothing impressive that's for sure. So I think he gets this season to show some improvement or come 08 we will have a new H.C.

Well now I'm no draft guru when it comes to players, so I'll just give positions that I think we should be targeting:

Rd. 1- Thomas, Johnson, or Peterson

Rd. 2- Guard

Rd. 3- DL or CB

Rd. 4- CB or DL

Rds. 5 thru 7- depth, probably OL, DL, and CB most of all.

As I said, because of unknown factors I can't really get into the 2008 season, I mean we don't know what injuries might occur, how Frye will play, how our WR's will play, how the OL will play, what F.A.'s will be availabe and if we will be looking for a new H.C.

So I'll just give you some of the F.A.'s from you Madden list, that I would be targeting:

Though I'd be looking at the OT, RG, and CB positions, I'm not really sure which of these players would be good for us??? If we get Thomas then that helps the OT spot a lot. RG is a definite need and CB should be looked at as well.

The F.A.'s I'd really be looking at are:

Michael Turner-RB- we need a young stud in our backfield. Now I know he is not really proven as a RB but he's got strong upside and he may be a better KR than Cribbs?

Billy Volek-QB- we need a solid vet on our QB corp. Volek could be a great backup and if Frye flops then he could start a season or two until we find a youngin to take the reigns.

Julius Peppers-DE- do I really have to explain this one... he's a stud and a beast, we could use him BIG TIME but he would cost an arm, leg, and probably a testicle but he would be worth it.

Simeon Rice-DE- I live in the Tampa Bay area and Rice is good. Though I'm not sure of his age and we already have aging guys that we will need to replace.

Shelton Quarles-LB- again I'm not sure of his age but he is good, especially as a pass rusher but I think he's aging a bit so we would not want to overpay and the bucs have never been good in cold weather, lol.

Troy Polumalu or Bob Sanders-S- either of these players could help out and really improve our S position, I'm leaning towards Troy because Sanders has had a knee injury problem and that's scary.

Ok, I've had my say on these issues. Sorry I didn't get the chance to reply sooner and that I'm not really getting into the 2008 season. Great post and great effort Soup,


[Linked Image from i89.photobucket.com]
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum How to build a Franchise

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5