Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Ballpeen #86061 04/17/07 02:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,426
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,426
I'm not a gun owner, I'll never be a gun owner. And I don't mean to sound snide in saying the following question, I simply cannot understand the other side of the argument on this question, why are assault weapons needed? I get hunting requires some gun use, I understand some people want to have a personal gun for home safety. But I cannot understand why someone would feel the need for an assault weapon. Again, I'm not trying to sound snide, I'm simply trying to comprehend that side...


[color:"green"] "World domination has encountered a momentary setback. Please talk amongst yourselves." Get Fuzzy[/color]
Ballpeen #86062 04/17/07 02:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Quote:

No.

here is a good site.....it is set up by the goofballs who want gun control....but it gives a good idea of the laws in various states.

Just click a state to see the current laws and note the grade given by state.....IMO states with a F are good...Ohio rates a D-....Tennessee a D+, so Ohio is more gun friendly than Tennessee..Alabama is an F...maybe I will move there.


Just don't sign up for any of their anti-NRA stuff...just use the site.

OOPs....

http://www.bradycampaign.org/legislation/state/




here is another great site for gun owners and potential gun owners.
http://www.packing.org/

logdawg #86063 04/17/07 02:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Quote:

I'm not a gun owner, I'll never be a gun owner. And I don't mean to sound snide in saying the following question, I simply cannot understand the other side of the argument on this question, why are assault weapons needed? I get hunting requires some gun use, I understand some people want to have a personal gun for home safety. But I cannot understand why someone would feel the need for an assault weapon. Again, I'm not trying to sound snide, I'm simply trying to comprehend that side...




Why would anyone need a Mustang, or a Corvette, or any car that goes over the speed limit? Its all about personal choice, and your right to buy what you want.

JulesDawg #86064 04/17/07 02:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Taking over for excl in his absence?

We can all wish it was true...


yebat' Putin
DCDAWGFAN #86065 04/17/07 02:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
J
Legend
Offline
Legend
J
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
Somebody has to pick up the slack in his absence.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431
I
IRE 45 Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
I
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,431
If it is a home defense weapon you want then you really can't go wrong woth a good old 12 Ga. It may make a mess if you were to ever use it indoors but the sight of that big bore looking down on you would be enough to make even the hardest core criminal blink . There is zero chance you miss him inside of 10-15 feet with a Turkey load of .000 buckshot . That is my primary load of choice for my home defender. JMHO.

IRE 45 #86067 04/17/07 04:15 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 20
G
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
G
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 20
Quote:

Aren't there somewhere in the area of 100 million firearms in this country ? How would they plan to fight that number ? Aside from that gunowners have something even more powerful than a gun ....a vote and the politicians know it.




Even non-gunowners have a vote.... Its just a shame that so few people bother to exercise that right.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
J
Legend
Offline
Legend
J
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
Quit pretending like you care. You just want to get enough posts to play games.

JulesDawg #86069 04/17/07 04:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
I can't even tell where he's from... is that a city in Ohio or an abbreviation that means he's on lithium?


yebat' Putin
IRE 45 #86070 04/17/07 04:29 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,099
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,099
Not a gun owner, but for the most part, I'm not bothered by my law-abiding neighbor owning one. I'm kinda with logdog on the subject of assault weapons... but that's for another post.

I actually wanted to share a home security tip that was sent to me just today, by Betsie K-9- a "quiet Dawg Talker," good friend, and non-gun owner. It's for guys like us. Daman- you might want to consider this one, too:


__________________________________________________

HOW TO INSTALL A HOME SECURITY SYSTEM


1. Go to a second-hand store and buy a pair of men's used size 14-16 Work boots.
2. Place them on your front porch, along with several empty beer cans, a copy of Guns & Ammo magazine and several NRA magazines.
3. Put a few giant dog dishes next to the boots and magazine.
4. Leave a note on your door that reads:

Hey Bubba, Big Jim, Duke and Slim-
Went to the gun shop for more ammo. Back in an hour.
Don't mess with the pit bulls -- they jumped the mailman this morning and messed him up pretty good. I think Killer stayed out of it, but it was hard to tell from all the blood. Took an hour to clean up the mess.

PS - I locked all four of 'em in the house. Better wait outside.

seeya soon.


"too many notes, not enough music-"

#GMStong
DCDAWGFAN #86071 04/17/07 04:29 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,222
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,222
It's Lithium. He's just a rookie.

Tyler will get bhim on stronger stuff before you know it.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
PitDAWG #86072 04/17/07 04:30 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
J
Legend
Offline
Legend
J
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
I think he's a she, by the way.

JulesDawg #86073 04/17/07 04:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,222
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,222
Quote:

I think he's a she, by the way.




Which ever. They'll never know trhe difference on Lithium.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,960


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
JulesDawg #86075 04/17/07 04:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
How do you know these things?


yebat' Putin
Riddler #86076 04/17/07 06:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
I just have to supply a thought for Riddler.

The citizens of the US have a right to keep and bear arms due to our constitution. This was added to the constitution because of the failure of our first government, and due to the british during the revolutionary war. The british saw to it that they'd remove guns from the homes of colonists, to keep the colonists from fighting them. The first government, the Confederate States of America, was removed by the citizenry for being ineffective.

We have a right to keep and bear arms so that if all other means fail, we citizens will be able to remove a failed government, or defend ourselves from an invading power (ie. failed government). As we had to fight oppressors for innitial control of our country, the guns we used became part of our country.

The people of England were considered subjects long before they were citizens, and their government learned long ago that helpless people were controllable people. This is the same story for Australia that started as a penal colony, and needed only the people in control to have the guns.

As a strict counterpoint to the gun debate; guns don't kill people, but they do make it much more efficient. I believe if this wacko had the time, he could have just stocked up nitrate fertilizer over a couple years and still have had an efficient method of killing people. I don't recall a single gun being fired by the wacko in Oklahoma City.


[Linked Image from s2.excoboard.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,222
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,222
Quote:

I don't recall a single gun being fired by the wacko in Oklahoma City.




But the wacko's in Waco used a damned TANK!


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Riddler #86078 04/17/07 08:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

For me that question hasn't been answered. Why is this such a prevalent occurence in the US??




There is only one way to put a dent in this kind of violence. Make it LAW that if a kid in school gets mouthy with a teacher he is disciplined with the paddle, if he lays a hand on a teacher the teach has free reign to beat the student to a pulp. The problem with this country is that lawyers took away an adults right to teach respect. Many of you will cry about my method - look in the mirror - you are responsible for the lack of respect in this country. Lawyers and Democrats have made it so that if you are under 18 you can do anything you want without punishment. Lawyers and Democrats made it that if you committ a crime "it's society's fault, it's okay you weren't loved enough as a child so we'll let you slide." Let people slide long enough and soon they will fall.

I grew up with guns. My Dad would clean them in the living room (when he wasn't cleaning them they were under lock and key). He would let us hold them and taught us about them. We could point it at the TV and were always told, "Point it at me, your brother or mother and I'm going to hit you with it." Let me tell you, the last thought on your mind is to joke with them. Never once did he have to even threaten to hit us because we were raised with respect.

Try that nowadays and the kids first thought is "I'll sue you, you can't touch me." Yeah, I just went on a soap box, but it all boils down to respect and discipline. Due to lawyers and Democrats, neither exist anymore-- hell, you aren't even allowed to spank your child anymore - how ridiculous is that.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
LMAO!!


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
logdawg #86080 04/17/07 08:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
Quote:

why are assault weapons needed?




Any weapon is a assault weapon. And anything can be a weapon. Two hammers can make a pretty good weapon.

This guy used two 9mm handguns...those aren't assault weapons in most people view, but they sure worked.

What you need to get is people are the problem. A gun is nothing more than a tool. A chainsaw in a crowded room could be a big problem for the people without the saw if someone wanted to use it as such.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #86081 04/17/07 09:00 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,513
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,513
Quote:

This guy used two 9mm handguns




One was a 9mm semi-auto hand gun and the other was a 22... just FYI... doesn't matter much because I still think he legally had a right to have the guns... but in no way to I believe that he had a right to use them in this way

only way you can change the law to make it better in this situation is if they required a psych eval before buying a gun...


<><

#gmstrong
Ballpeen #86082 04/17/07 09:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
Actually, ballpeen, the reports I have seen as of late say the guy had a 9 mm, and a .22 caliber handgun.

jaybird #86083 04/17/07 09:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
OK....one was a .22....my mistake....at any rate, neither one is what most would call assault weapons.

Plus.....put them in the nightstand or in a closet, they just lay there. They don't crawl out and start shooting.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
Quote:

The problem with regulation is that it really only affects law abiding citizens. Criminals don't abide by laws as it is---why would they abide by new laws?




Exactly!!! We already have multiple laws that were broken in this case. The first one would be: murder. See, that is against the law. Who honestly thinks that more laws dealing with guns is going to stop something like this from happening?

The guy broke the current laws, as criminals tend to do. What's breaking one more law going to do to stop them?

IRE 45 #86085 04/17/07 09:10 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
You all will probably think pretty negatively of this. But they need to have a universal medical database with our health records in it. And then in order to purchase a gun, it should run a mental health check. If you turn up with a mental health problem from that database, then no guns for you. Period.

-Eve

Ballpeen #86086 04/17/07 09:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

OK....one was a .22....my mistake....at any rate, neither one is what most would call assault weapons.

Plus.....put them in the nightstand or in a closet, they just lay there. They don't crawl out and start shooting.




Personall, I'd rather get shot with a .44 as it'll go in and come out in a straight line. That .22 will hit you in one spot and come out after ricocheting inside your body and tearing it up. Either way though, you are 100% correct. We need PEOPLE CONTROL, not gun control.

EveDawg #86087 04/17/07 09:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

You all will probably think pretty negatively of this. But they need to have a universal medical database with our health records in it. And then in order to purchase a gun, it should run a mental health check. If you turn up with a mental health problem from that database, then no guns for you. Period.

-Eve



Won't prevent purchase of illegally sold guns. Also, people who do this typically don't let anyone in close enough to them to know if they are mental.

Soup #86088 04/17/07 09:15 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
Not sure what kind of .22 you shoot, but I haven't had one come out of even a ground hog, let alone a person. and a .44 going clean through? Perhaps, at close range, and with a round nose. And even with a hollow point, at close range, perhaps. But a 22 going through someone? I just haven't seen it, but I haven't seen everything.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

Not sure what kind of .22 you shoot, but I haven't had one come out of even a ground hog, let alone a person. and a .44 going clean through? Perhaps, at close range, and with a round nose. And even with a hollow point, at close range, perhaps. But a 22 going through someone? I just haven't seen it, but I haven't seen everything.


i've never hunted, but I've heard .22s can/have done that. (If they don't come out they aren't always exactly where they hit). Haven't shot a rifle or handgun in years. Now, when I get the chance, I just go clay pigeon shooting with my Dad with a 1936 Winchester side-by-side. (Yes, I'm aware it's not made for that - but it's the most beautiful gun there is, I just like shooting it)

Soup #86090 04/17/07 09:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
I'm saying the gun dealers could run a mental health background check before they sell a gun to anyone, if they had that sort of database in place. Sure, it won't stop people from buying on the black market, but it would help at least. Anyways, I hate guns. I will not date a guy who owns guns. That's just me.

-Eve

EveDawg #86091 04/17/07 09:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

I'm saying the gun dealers could run a mental health background check before they sell a gun to anyone, if they had that sort of database in place. Sure, it won't stop people from buying on the black market, but it would help at least. Anyways, I hate guns. I will not date a guy who owns guns. That's just me.

-Eve




Please don't take offense to this. You'd be best to get yourself over that hate. It'd be much wiser (if you plan on having kids/have kids) to learn about them and teach your kids about them. Rather than have them "hate" them if they respect them and know about them then if they got caught in a situation where their friend has a gun and says "look" your child will be smart enough to know how to put the safety on and show the gun respect and take it to proper authorites so nothing stupid happens. People fear what they hate, fearing a gun leads to panic. Respecting it leads to a smart choice. Again, please don't take offense to this, it's just a suggestion.

Soup #86092 04/17/07 09:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
I'm not offended. I've been around guns. I shot guns. I just don't want that any part of my life. I don't have to force myself to like guns because someone else likes them. Nor do I have to date men who feel the need to keep guns around. There are plenty who don't see the need for it also.

-Eve

Last edited by EveDawg; 04/17/07 09:35 PM.
EveDawg #86093 04/17/07 09:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
Quote:

I'm saying the gun dealers could run a mental health background check before they sell a gun to anyone, if they had that sort of database in place. Sure, it won't stop people from buying on the black market, but it would help at least. Anyways, I hate guns. I will not date a guy who owns guns. That's just me.

-Eve




While I understand the sentiment you have, I question the "worthiness" of it. Let's face it, people don't go into buy a gun and say "by the way, I have a mental disorder", do they?

As it is, there is already a background check. If you are a felon, you cannot buy a gun (legally, that is). What I'm trying to get at, and probably not doing a good job of it, is: what sort of mental illness disqualifies a person from getting a gun? And how does that enhance the system already in place?

For example: this student at VT - he didn't have a mental disability - (that anyone knows of, at least).

Bottom line is, he broke the law. The current law that is in place. You could've added 10 more laws, and he would've broken them, and the only person you effect with the law you support would be the person legally buying a gun - and the only affect on him/her would be an added cost.

We have enough laws, what we need to do is stop people from breaking the laws in place (which will never happen), so the next step is enforcing the laws. No matter what you do, something like this can happen, and it doesn't take guns. (Bath, Michigan, for example - more people killed than at VT, and not a single gun used).

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Either I am not good at explaining or everyone is mis-reading my posts. I am saying that if our medical community got their butts together, they could come up with some sort of universal medical database for medical records. Then the gun shops could run a background check on mental health history. I know this fantasy land dreaming. But it *would* be cool for various reasons, and not just gun control.

-Eve

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

Bottom line is, he broke the law. The current law that is in place. You could've added 10 more laws, and he would've broken them, and the only person you effect with the law you support would be the person legally buying a gun - and the only affect on him/her would be an added cost.




Not really eager to get in the gun control debate regarding the VT incident - it's not what we should be focused on...but for the record the kid bought the guns legally.

EveDawg #86096 04/17/07 10:02 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,513
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,513
Except that it's 'illegal' and 'unethical' to have those records released... all they'd be able to see is if someone went to see a pysch or not... not what was actually found.....


<><

#gmstrong
EveDawg #86097 04/17/07 10:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:

Either I am not good at explaining or everyone is mis-reading my posts. I am saying that if our medical community got their butts together, they could come up with some sort of universal medical database for medical records. Then the gun shops could run a background check on mental health history. I know this fantasy land dreaming. But it *would* be cool for various reasons, and not just gun control.

-Eve




I get what you are saying, problem is - we'd all have to have psych tests for this to be effective, then they wouldn't let me own a pencil let alone a gun

PDR #86098 04/17/07 10:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
Quote:


Not really eager to get in the gun control debate regarding the VT incident - it's not what we should be focused on...but for the record the kid bought the guns legally.




Good, he bought them legally. And? We should ban guns because a person bought them legally, and used them in an unlawful manner? Is that what you are getting at? I hope not.

After all, what about the car that was bought legally, but had a drunk driver kill someone? Or how about that car, that was bought legally, and the driver was speeding and caused an accident that killed someone - should we ban cars, as well?

How about all those cheeseburgers that were legally bought, and caused the driver of a legally purchased car to have a heart attack, which caused the car to hit a school bus killing "X" number of kids - should we ban cars and cheeseburgers?

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 848
Quote:


- should we ban cars and cheeseburgers?




Cheeseburgers don't kill people, people kill cheeseburgers.

Ballpeen #86100 04/17/07 10:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,426
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,426
You just entirely side-stepped the question. Actually, since we're on the topic, one of the guns that was used was a semi-automatic with an extended clip, a gun that was just recently legalized by the expiration of the 1994 assault weapons ban. What, legally, does a person need that gun for that a normal 9mm wouldn't do? Personally, guns like that seem to be more about the machismo factor than actual use, from anything that I have read on the topic.


[color:"green"] "World domination has encountered a momentary setback. Please talk amongst yourselves." Get Fuzzy[/color]
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Gun Control ??

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5