Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,137
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,137
Good post Clem. I don't see how anyone could consider this guy's actions anything but premeditated murder.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Quote:

Agreed.... But the family of these kids speaking out against their deaths really lights a fire under me. Seriously, Seriously! In my opinion, if you're going to speak out against it in this situation then you better be prepared to be held accountable for the actions of your children!



I know you're probably NOT comparing these two cases, but I think a death of your child-brother-family member, regardless of circumstances that don't include the child hurting or killing someone, kind of puts a mind into a different reality.

I would never tell a family member who's child-brother-whatever had been "murdered" that they have no right to seek justice that would include the death penalty. I wouldn't because I, fortunately, have not been in their situation, so, for what it's worth, I rely on the justice system.

I haven't had anyone killed while they were robbing someone either, so I have no idea what a family's thinking would be except I'm kind of certain there would be a sense of being wronged, in that the consequence didn't fit the crime.

I have no problem with an elderly woman or man using a weapon to defend. I also have no idea what kind of fear they would be experiencing and how that would effect their behaviors.

The kids had zero right to be there, but I believe this case is way different from the kid in the garage.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
I am curious why you specify it is OK for an "Elderly" person to use a weapon, but apparently not everybody else. Do you see it as "more fair" because they are overmatched, being old?

There are many areas of life where "fairness" just does not apply. For someone illegally in my home, looking to do harm to me or my family, or looking to steal what I have worked hours, days, weeks, months, or even years to obtain, being "fair" with them is just not on my agenda.

In the garage case, nothing outside of ordinary, usual circumstances was created by the homeowner. He was inside his home when the incident began.

Someone made the analogy to a hunt, and applied it in a way I frankly find amazing. It is the homeowner, the productive citizen, who has found himself to be the prey animal. He has witnessed the very low odds of anyone catching the home invader, the extremely low odds of getting their hard-earned property returned, and then watched as these felons, after multiple offenses, get a slap on the wrist.

One of the largest and most populous states in the country has voted to put in place laws which allow the citizen to begin to redress this imbalance. Even in California, the land of the liberal, their law contains remarkably similar wording to that of the heinous rednecks in Florida, differing only by requiring "reasonable fear". That is a lot like requiring "forcible entry". Florida has simply recognized that is such a situation, "fear" is automatically "reasonable", and just left out that language.

We're tired of it. The old methods are not working. We're going to try something else. A vast majority, again of one of the most populous states in the country, is all for it.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,428
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,428
Quote:

Quote:

Agreed.... But the family of these kids speaking out against their deaths really lights a fire under me. Seriously, Seriously! In my opinion, if you're going to speak out against it in this situation then you better be prepared to be held accountable for the actions of your children!



I know you're probably NOT comparing these two cases, but I think a death of your child-brother-family member, regardless of circumstances that don't include the child hurting or killing someone, kind of puts a mind into a different reality.

I would never tell a family member who's child-brother-whatever had been "murdered" that they have no right to seek justice that would include the death penalty. I wouldn't because I, fortunately, have not been in their situation, so, for what it's worth, I rely on the justice system.

I haven't had anyone killed while they were robbing someone either, so I have no idea what a family's thinking would be except I'm kind of certain there would be a sense of being wronged, in that the consequence didn't fit the crime.

I have no problem with an elderly woman or man using a weapon to defend. I also have no idea what kind of fear they would be experiencing and how that would effect their behaviors.

The kids had zero right to be there, but I believe this case is way different from the kid in the garage.





I specifically was speaking of the Easter robbery with the old couple. Using the word Murder is inappropriate as it wasn't murder and I know what I believe and I know I would be heartbroken if my child was killed but I would go into the media and apologize to anyone who was terrorized by my child trying to rob them. I just don't have sympathy for those that chose to break the law!


The Views Expressed By Me Are Not Necessarily The Views That You Will Agree With, I'm In My Own Little World But They Know Me Here.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Quote:


I specifically was speaking of the Easter robbery with the old couple. Using the word Murder is inappropriate as it wasn't murder and I know what I believe and I know I would be heartbroken if my child was killed but I would go into the media and apologize to anyone who was terrorized by my child trying to rob them. I just don't have sympathy for those that chose to break the law!


I probably wasn't clear. I wasn't talking about the elderly lady when I said murder and as far as the garage case I guess it will only be murder if the prosecutor decides he can prove it and he does.

But I bet the kid's dad thinks it's murder and that's all I meant. I think any parent who lost a child in the way this kid in the garage was lost would think it was murder.

But in the end it it doesn't matter what I think or the papers think. It will be left for the courts to decide.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

What deep-seated emotional trauma led you to fervently believe that anyone with a list which contained your name was actively seeking to end your existence on this planet? Not saying you're wrong, just curious why you would jump to this conclusion. Is this a common problem for you?




When a person with mental health issues tells you that you're on their list, and it may be a hit list, or it may be a list of people they wish to rape with dairy products...that really doesn't sound like a conclusion reached by way of emotional trauma, does it?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
Man, you really are a broken record. Only one play in your playbook, isn't there?

Why don't you just go troll somewhere else? You don't even make me laugh, anymore.

Although, picturing you in your basement apartment, fearfully peeking out the windows, while remaining ever vigilant against the upcoming Pistachio Pandemonium does make me chuckle, just a bit.

EDIT: We had a committee meeting, and the title of the upcoming top-secret operation may be changed to Nuts for Butts! It's currently tied with Pistachio Pandemonium, although both are solidly ahead of The Green Ream in the voting.

Last edited by Nelson37; 05/09/14 06:44 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

Although, picturing you in your basement apartment, fearfully peeking out the windows, while remaining ever vigilant against the upcoming Pistachio Pandemonium does make me chuckle, just a bit.

EDIT: We had a committee meeting, and the title of the upcoming top-secret operation may be changed to Nuts for Butts! It's currently tied with Pistachio Pandemonium, although both are solidly ahead of The Green Ream in the voting.




You sure have thought out your rape fantasies, eh?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
I guess dealing with antisocial, psychotic, paranoid, delusional personalities brings out my whimsical side.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

I guess dealing with antisocial, psychotic, paranoid, delusional personalities brings out my whimsical side.




This is coming from the guy who has expressed a desire to rape and/or kill me?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,428
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,428
Wow, this thread went way downhill ..... and considering the topis that began the thread, that's really saying something.

Refs, can we get this mess locked up or something.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
I had a list and mentioned ice cream. Rape and Kill??? Exaggerate much?

Like I said, anti-social, psychotic, paranoid, and delusional.

Worthless troll.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

It could be a list of people to whom I intend to deliver a quart of Pistachio ice cream, because I think they really need one. My preferred method of delivery into the digestive system might be a bit unorthodox, involving a rapid lifting motion, but IMO its far more aesthetically pleasing




Sounds like rape to me.

Also sounds like you enjoy the notion.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Here is an update to this trial...


'Stand your ground' defense fails in Montana murder trial

By LISA BAUMANN
Associated Press

MISSOULA, Mont. (AP) - Just days before he shot to death a 17-year-old German exchange student, Markus Kaarma told hair stylists he had been waiting up to shoot some kids who were burglarizing homes.

He told them they would see it on the news.

Kaarma hoped to bait an intruder by leaving his garage door partially open and placing a purse inside, prosecutors said. And when he did, a motion detector alerted him early April 27. Kaarma took a shotgun outside and almost immediately fired four blasts into the garage. Diren Dede, unarmed, was hit twice. He died after the final shot hit him in the head.

For those reasons, Kaarma's "castle doctrine" defense, which allows people to use deadly force to protect their home and family, failed him Wednesday. A Missoula jury convicted him of deliberate homicide.

Cheers erupted in the packed Missoula courtroom when the verdict was read. Dede's parents, from Hamburg, Germany, hugged and cried.

"It is very good," Dede's father, Celal Dede, said with tears in his eyes. "Long live justice."

Kaarma faces a minimum penalty of 10 years in prison when he is sentenced Feb. 11. His lawyers plan to appeal.

On Thursday, Dede's parents will give statements to the judge to consider at sentencing. Prosecutors asked for the hearing so the couple won't have to return to Missoula in February.

Kaarma's case was the latest in a series in which the shooter had invoked the castle doctrine, testing the boundaries of self-defense law.

In May, a 65-year-old Minnesota man was convicted of murder after lying in wait in his basement for two teenagers and killing them during a break-in. In July, an 89-year-old North Carolina man shot and killed a 47-year-old tenant who angrily demanded the landlord fix his air conditioning. Prosecutors declined to file charges.

Last year in Florida, a jury acquitted security guard George Zimmerman in the 2012 shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman followed the teenager, contended the boy attacked him, and was acquitted of murder even though he was not at his home at the time of the shooting.

More than 30 U.S. states, including Montana, have laws expanding the right of people to use deadly force to protect their homes or themselves, some of them known as "stand your ground" laws. The self-defense principle known as the castle doctrine is a centuries-old premise that a person has the right to defend their home against attack. The name evokes the old saying, "my home is my castle."

University of Montana law professor Andrew King-Ries noted state law does allow homeowners to use deadly force to protect their property, but it requires them to act reasonably.

"What the jury's saying here is, you have a right to defend yourself, but this isn't reasonable," King-Ries said. "Lots of people have guns here, and lots of people feel very strongly that comes with a responsibility to handle your weapon appropriately."

Kaarma's attorneys argued at trial that he feared for his life, didn't know if the intruder was armed, and was on edge because his garage was burglarized at least once in the weeks before the shooting. They said Kaarma feared for his family's safety.

But jurors heard neighbors testify that Kaarma's girlfriend, Janelle Pflager, told them the couple planned to bait and catch a burglar themselves because they believed police weren't responding.

They also heard hair stylist Tanya Colby, who testified that Kaarma told her during a haircut: "I've been up three nights with a shotgun waiting to kill some kids." She said he later told her, "I'm not kidding, you're seriously going to see this on the news."

One of Kaarma's neighbors, Terry Klise, called the verdict a "huge weight lifted."

"The man was a threat to our neighborhood," Klise said of Kaarma.

The German government followed the case closely. Hamburg prosecutor Carsten Rinio said this week his office had been investigating the Dede case, as required under German law.

"We are really grateful to everybody involved and particularly impressed by the outpouring of sympathy that Diren's parents experienced here in Missoula," Julia Reinhardt, with the German consulate in San Francisco, said Wednesday.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
I Agree with the outcome.

If you bait and wait, that is not defense, that is offense.


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Originally Posted By: FloridaFan
I Agree with the outcome.

If you bait and wait, that is not defense, that is offense.


+1

Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... German student Diren Dede killed in 'castle doctrine' case

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5