Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#889428 06/19/14 04:58 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,120
Likes: 134
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,120
Likes: 134
I was reading a story about how Browns Rookies are helping out at FES coaching a youth football clinic and a thought occurred to me,, can Shaw really beat out Thigpen?

And if he does, we'll have 3 QB on the roster and about 5 starts between them..

Everything I've read about Shaw says that he could be better than Thigpen ever was, maybe better than Manziel or Hoyer.. but it appears that he will need time.

So what are the chances he sticks and Thigpen is gone?

What are the chances he gets put on the PS? I think if what happens is what I think happens and he goes on PS, he'll get sucked up quickly. Just a guess of course.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Damanshot #889429 06/19/14 05:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
If you pick someone off their practice squad they have to be added to your 53 man roster. That might not be something a team would be willing to do with a "worthless" QB. Every 53 man roster spot is precious.


#gmstrong
Damanshot #889430 06/19/14 05:15 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,949
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,949
Likes: 763
Quote:


Everything I've read about Shaw says that he could be better than Thigpen ever was




That really is not saying a whole lot. Seriously.

As for better than Hoyer or Manziel.... if he has that much going on for him, there is no way he goes on the Practice Squad. In fact, I'd see us carrying all three on the roster and unloading one for a 1st rounder in the offseason.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Damanshot #889431 06/19/14 05:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,528
Likes: 6
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,528
Likes: 6
He is very similar to Manziel and IMHO will beat out thigpen. I would love to see him slow developed, he has some skill. No one has really talked about him, but this kid should have been a 3rd rounder imho.

Damanshot #889432 06/19/14 06:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 107
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 107
Like Thigpen quite little. I keep Shaw on the 53 as a third. We work with him as we try to address this season the most glaring weakness we have had for years. We have enough depth elsewhere to carry him. We have often needed three (at least). With Hoyer, Manziel, and Shaw we have a mix of abilities. Nobody has proven greatness as The Answer yet. I think over hedging the QB this season would be brilliant and prudent.
PS or trade is an option. I feel better without Thiggy meself.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Bard Dawg #889433 06/19/14 10:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
If we PS Shaw, someone MIGHT pick him up...if we cut Thigpen, he'll likely be there later if we need him down the road.

Dude was out of the NFL all year last year.

Where is the trick-shot artist right now?

WSU Willie #889434 06/19/14 10:45 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,839
Likes: 11
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,839
Likes: 11
Shaw will be out thigpen.. and if he doesnt.. it wont be b/c of skill.. it will be due to nfl experience.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,760
Likes: 622
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,760
Likes: 622
I'm just kidding around with you when I say this, but I think your signature is having a Madden effect on our players. Could you go ahead and make a signature with the 5 best Steelers players?


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
Damanshot #889436 06/20/14 12:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
Shaw will absolutely beat out Thigpen.


The kid is a baller and a gamer. We'll all understand so much better when SC struggles on offense without him. The kid is a gym rat and will continuously improve. I want him on the roster as long as he is willing to be here. He will in time become a starter...He will learn better than Rodgers did...will he be successful like that? Absolutely (most likely) not...but he will work incredibly hard to succeed and be the best he possibly can.

Shaw will stick. He's going to outwork everyone (cept maybe Hoyer).


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
KingSteve #889437 06/20/14 03:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 582
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 582
Quote:

Shaw will absolutely beat out Thigpen.
The kid is a baller and a gamer. Shaw will stick.




The thing that stands out for me is 1 (one!) interception. Now that may not translate into the NFL, but it shows he knows how the game is played, rather than being just a "Flinger" like DA. Been a long time since we have had a guy like that. It will be interesting to see him in a preseason game.

Last edited by dawg531; 06/20/14 03:15 PM.

[Linked Image from dcptest.com]
dawg531 #889438 06/23/14 05:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 107
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 107
One pick is astounding. Good insight, because you have to have your head in the game to manage that low a number. He will outwork people as well? Bonus. Big time. I would like to see him stick as our third. Sounds like picking him up is a good move. training him up under Shanny can't hurt either IMO.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Damanshot #889439 06/23/14 06:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
I thought this was about a wide receiver. Isn't there a Vernon Conner, and a somebody Shaw at wide receiver. That's my dyslexci mind again.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
KingSteve #889440 06/23/14 07:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,573
Likes: 815
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,573
Likes: 815
Quote:

Shaw will absolutely beat out Thigpen.


The kid is a baller and a gamer. We'll all understand so much better when SC struggles on offense without him. The kid is a gym rat and will continuously improve. I want him on the roster as long as he is willing to be here. He will in time become a starter...He will learn better than Rodgers did...will he be successful like that? Absolutely (most likely) not...but he will work incredibly hard to succeed and be the best he possibly can.

Shaw will stick. He's going to outwork everyone (cept maybe Hoyer).






I agree. I keep him for upside. Look at it this way, if Hoyer wins out, he doesn't need a mentor on the bench. When Manziel takes over, Hoyer becomes the mentor. In the mean time we have Shaw, who I think is tradeable because I think he will turn in to a solid pro QB.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #889441 06/24/14 07:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Likes: 98
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Likes: 98
I agree Shaw should become a solid Pro...


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
PastorMarc #889442 06/24/14 07:15 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,573
Likes: 815
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,573
Likes: 815
Quote:

I agree Shaw should become a solid Pro...






And.......you never know....maybe Shaw becomes our guy. Stranger things have happened. I like Conner Shaw....the kid has talent, has played well, and I like Coach Spurrier and his eye for talent


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #889443 06/24/14 07:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Likes: 98
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Likes: 98
Quote:

Quote:

I agree Shaw should become a solid Pro...






And.......you never know....maybe Shaw becomes our guy. Stranger things have happened. I like Conner Shaw....the kid has talent, has played well, and I like Coach Spurrier and his eye for talent






John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Ballpeen #889444 06/25/14 07:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 107
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 107
I like Hoyer, will back Manziel, but I want to reiterate: I truly do not care who wins ball games for us, just let that winning begin. We have filled seasons with fixing blame for losses on top of losses. We are ready for a Bernie type of mentality IMO, and the "smarter" QB must be part of being a good QB and package for The Man. Just win baby!

It might well be, that this could be a season with "victory by committee" if it is to happen.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Bard Dawg #889445 06/25/14 08:01 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,120
Likes: 134
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,120
Likes: 134
Quote:

I like Hoyer, will back Manziel, but I want to reiterate: I truly do not care who wins ball games for us, just let that winning begin. We have filled seasons with fixing blame for losses on top of losses. We are ready for a Bernie type of mentality IMO, and the "smarter" QB must be part of being a good QB and package for The Man. Just win baby!

It might well be, that this could be a season with "victory by committee" if it is to happen.






#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Bard Dawg #889446 06/25/14 09:12 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 222
Quote:

It might well be, that this could be a season with "victory by committee" if it is to happen.




Victories in the NFL always come by committee...we've just not had or applied the committee very often.

Bard Dawg #889447 06/25/14 09:55 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189


#gmstrong
Damanshot #889448 06/25/14 10:31 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
Shaw has some good tools, from the games I've seen him in.

Pros:
He's pretty mobile, he moves well.
Has a good internal clock
They ran a similar offense to what Shannhan runs, some read option etc.


Cons:
He's 6 foot
Very long, slow release
Arm is good but not great




He is a nice little project and I: think he has the tools to beat out Thigpen, but does the FO want two rookie QB's on the roster? I dunno.

BpG #889449 06/25/14 12:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 107
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 107
I am with you. But what "beats out" Thigpen? Shaw is better or Thiggy is worse how? What part of the "project" are you attaching worth to in this case? Not disagreeing with you, but he is a keeper as a 3rd for what reasons. Haven't seen enough of either probably
Well, I may have actually seen more than enough of Thigpen come to think of it.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Bard Dawg #889450 06/25/14 02:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
I know almost nothing about Thigpen to be honest.

BpG #889451 06/25/14 02:58 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,822
Likes: 460
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,822
Likes: 460
He is worse than Brady Quinn.

That's all I need to know


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
GMdawg #889452 06/25/14 05:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Quote:

He is worse than Brady Quinn.

That's all I need to know




I read an article today suggesting that, since Hoyer is coming off injury and etc, that both JF and Thigpen may pass him up in the depth charts. Not sure how much I buy into it, if at all, but some wonderful sports writer took it upon themselves to make the comment...

And so I don't get called a liar:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000352557/article/projected-2014-starters-cleveland-browns

Quote:

Brian Hoyer has four NFL starts in five seasons and is seven months removed from ACL surgery. Does that sound like a quarterback who will hold off Johnny Manziel and all that comes with "Johnny Football" -- exciting preseason plays, a clamoring fan base, the promise of a new tomorrow and hope dancing in the pocket? Don't be surprised if Tyler Thigpen -- with more than 10 NFL starts in the pistol offense under his belt -- is higher on the depth chart than Hoyer by the time September rolls around.



Dawg_LB #889453 06/25/14 05:50 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,760
Likes: 622
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,760
Likes: 622
That's just stupid.


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
dawglover05 #889454 06/25/14 07:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

That's just stupid.




This. And, I'm one of the guys that actually likes Thigpen. I just happen to like the other QBs on the roster more. If we didn't have one of the other 3 QBs on the roster, I would be all for keeping Thigpen. He could do a nice job if the need arose (he's a better QB than Weeden and Quinn - despite the post above to the contrary) to do spot duty or even finish out most of a season. The truth is that all of the others are younger and have a tremendous amount more upside than Thigpen is likely to give.

anarchy2day #889455 06/25/14 07:34 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,238
Likes: 594
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,238
Likes: 594
I don't think it's crazy enough to call the idea stupid.

We were saying the exact same thing about starting Hoyer over Campbell just last season.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
oobernoober #889456 06/25/14 07:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,822
Likes: 460
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,822
Likes: 460
Any kid who can complete 65.5 percent of his passes in collage, and 24 TD's with only 1 INT during his senior year deserves a good long hard look in the NFL Thigpen's stats are nowhere close in collage, and with his stats in the NFL and being 30 years old he does not deserve to hang around as our 3rd QB this season.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
oobernoober #889457 06/25/14 08:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,760
Likes: 622
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,760
Likes: 622
Quote:

I don't think it's crazy enough to call the idea stupid.

We were saying the exact same thing about starting Hoyer over Campbell just last season.




I was actually in support of playing Hoyer over Campbell last year after seeing Campbell mail it in at the end of the Ravens game.

I'm not sure how the two scenarios are really that comparable at all.


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
oobernoober #889458 06/25/14 08:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

I don't think it's crazy enough to call the idea stupid.

We were saying the exact same thing about starting Hoyer over Campbell just last season.




But that was last season and Hoyer should have been starting over Campbell. In truth, Hoyer should have been starting from Game 1, but because a first round selection was used on Weeden, he got the nod. It was a decision that ended up contributing a lot to Chudzinski losing his job. The decision to go with Campbell despite loss-after-loss-after-loss-after loss was another.

anarchy2day #889459 06/26/14 06:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,792
Likes: 1345
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,792
Likes: 1345
Not so sure about saying he should have been starting game 1. He wasn't even signed until mid May. Not sure a guy can learn the playbook and be ready to start by game 1.

Not saying he would have done worse, but rookies or any QB starting with only a few months in a new play book that wasn't a former starter has a lot of questions surrounding such a decision.

I believe even if they wanted to start Hoyer, they wanted to give him all the time they could before doing so. And I'm not sure that was a bad idea.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
PitDAWG #889460 06/26/14 08:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

Not so sure about saying he should have been starting game 1. He wasn't even signed until mid May. Not sure a guy can learn the playbook and be ready to start by game 1.




It was a new regime. None of them knew the playbook. Hoyer was the smartest QB on the roster last year and had the best ability to pick it up. I think that the fact that he is still on the roster and the other two (or three, if you include Tanney) are gone.

Not saying he would have done worse, but rookies or any QB starting with only a few months in a new play book that wasn't a former starter has a lot of questions surrounding such a decision.

Quote:

I believe even if they wanted to start Hoyer, they wanted to give him all the time they could before doing so. And I'm not sure that was a bad idea.




Well, they kept Weeden because the previous regime had expended a first round selection on him. It's why he was given the starting job. It certainly wasn't because of performance. Campbell proved why he was relegated to the #3 QB on the roster when he was passed up by Hoyer as the starter after Weeden hurt his thumb.

anarchy2day #889461 06/26/14 10:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Weeden did have game experience. Bad experiences, but experience nonetheless.


#gmstrong
ddubia #889462 06/27/14 01:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

Weeden did have game experience. Bad experiences, but experience nonetheless.




And the coaches should have known better than make him the starter.

anarchy2day #889463 06/27/14 05:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Yeah what did Chud say... "we had to see what we had" or something like that?

Couldn't tell that from all of the previous year's game tape, practice tape and etc... and then seeing it first hand at practice? Plus the only reason he got benched was because he hurt his thumb or something. Never had the injury, we may have never seen the Hoyer/Wallace show who, IMO, played better than Weeden did. Some marginally better, some not so much, but still better

JMO

Dawg_LB #889464 06/27/14 06:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

Yeah what did Chud say... "we had to see what we had" or something like that?

Couldn't tell that from all of the previous year's game tape, practice tape and etc... and then seeing it first hand at practice? Plus the only reason he got benched was because he hurt his thumb or something. Never had the injury, we may have never seen the Hoyer/Wallace show who, IMO, played better than Weeden did. Some marginally better, some not so much, but still better

JMO




Wallace? I know you meant Campbell.

But neither Weeden or Campbell played well enough to remain on the roster - and despite Hoyer's lack of game time experience, he should have been the starter from Game 1 last season. We all saw what Weeden had to offer the previous season. It was Chudzinski's call and he screwed the pooch with it. Personally, I'm not sad to see Chudzinski gone one bit. He reminded me way too much of Shurmur.

anarchy2day #889465 06/28/14 08:12 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Whoops, no idea why Wallace popped out haha..


DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Connor Shaw

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5