|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
You are better off just ignoring PDR. Seriously.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
|
OP
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435 |
I wouldn't touch Brett Hundley until at least the 3rd or 4th round.
He's another project QB.
He's been productive in college, but so have a thousand QB's.
From what I've seen on TV, and from the scouting reports I've from, he needs a 100% clean pocket to be accurate (sound familiar?) and is a one-read QB.
Hundley would be okay if we have another veteran QB that can start (and be effective) for 2 or 3 full seasons first.
"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 802
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 802 |
I've said this before: No team in the league is going to sign Hoyer and present him as their new starter. I don't see how anyone can argue that point. If a teams so bad that he is an upgrade, they are looking to the draft. I'd bring him back, and have Manziel glued to the bench. But I would use a mid-round pick on another guy or sign someone like Locker or Mallett. We have to have some upside somewhere. There is no upside with Hoyer and Manziel looks like a train wreck/longshot at this point. If someone like Hundley falls (it happens every year), grab them in the second or third.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum What is the contingency plan at
quarterback beyond these next two
games?