Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
Personally I think he sucks.


Would you care to provide some specific examples of how his playcalling and design are inferior to those of other offensive coordinators? Would you please talk about the route trees, blocking schemes, horizontal and vertical stretches, timing of the plays, etc?

Or, are you opinions more along the lines of how anarchy makes formulates his opinions?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
My biggest issue with his play calling was demonstrated in several games this year. End of the 1st half, not a lot of time on the clock, long field ahead of us and an offense that we know is not very good.

He comes out and throws ending up stopping the clock with incompletions. Can Aaron Rodgers and GB take over the ball at the 20 with 40 seconds remaining and drive down for a FG before halftime. Yes. Can Brian Hoyer and the Cleveland Browns do the same thing? Highly unlikely. Instead of running the ball and draining the clock we end up giving the ball back to the other team in position to possibly get a score as time runs out in the half


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Are you talking about the Tennessee game? wink

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Quote:
Can Aaron Rodgers and GB take over the ball at the 20 with 40 seconds remaining and drive down for a FG before halftime. Yes. Can Brian Hoyer and the Cleveland Browns do the same thing? Highly unlikely.


Didn't we have to pull a comeback victory vs the Falcons? What about that one? Second half, but still.......


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Quote:
Can Aaron Rodgers and GB take over the ball at the 20 with 40 seconds remaining and drive down for a FG before halftime. Yes. Can Brian Hoyer and the Cleveland Browns do the same thing? Highly unlikely. Instead of running the ball and draining the clock we end up giving the ball back to the other team in position to possibly get a score as time runs out in the half


jest...In Rogers first year in the Mike McArthy offense, do you believe he could accomplish the task you explained above?

So many forget, experience running an offensive scheme DOES MATTER.

Do you believe Hoyer could be better running this offense with a year of experience under his belt?

Last edited by mac; 01/04/15 11:14 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,711
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,711
Originally Posted By: mac
Quote:
Can Aaron Rodgers and GB take over the ball at the 20 with 40 seconds remaining and drive down for a FG before halftime. Yes. Can Brian Hoyer and the Cleveland Browns do the same thing? Highly unlikely. Instead of running the ball and draining the clock we end up giving the ball back to the other team in position to possibly get a score as time runs out in the half


jest...In Rogers first year in the Mike McArthy offense, do you believe he could accomplish the task you explained above?

So many forget, experience running an offensive scheme DOES MATTER.

Do you believe Hoyer could be better running this offense with a year of experience under his belt?



Thats not even a fair comparison Mac. In Rodger's first year, the least experienced players were the fullback and halfback. Both in their 2nd season. He had guys with 10 years in the system playing.

Hoyer and the Browns had nothing remotely like that. Austin was our most experienced receiver. None of them had 1 year in the system.

Anyone that says we sucked in a lot of ways wouldn't be wrong. The big problem is, that nobody wants to let anyone take their lumps before judging them.

I think if you were to take this entire team the way it stands right now, and fast forward 2-3 years, with a few less injuries, and the outcome would have been way different.


Attitude is everything....FEAR THE ELF!!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Vers - I don't remember which game off the top of my head which is why I didn't spaecifically reference it but there were at least 2 games where a situation similar to that happened. Now that I am thinking about it, I think that one might have been at the end of the game. Honestly though, I don't remember all the details.

Mac - My point is that Shanahan should have recognized that and taken it into consideration when making his play calls. We all knew that there was a higher probability that we give the ball back and the opponent tries a long fg before the half than us driving down and attempting our own fg.


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 313
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 313
Hmm, is it possible to say yes but it's contingent on this. If you hire him you must also take Manziel and Gordon and give us a (?) draft pick?

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 313
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 313
Originally Posted By: Jester
Vers - I don't remember which game off the top of my head which is why I didn't spaecifically reference it but there were at least 2 games where a situation similar to that happened. Now that I am thinking about it, I think that one might have been at the end of the game. Honestly though, I don't remember all the details.

Mac - My point is that Shanahan should have recognized that and taken it into consideration when making his play calls. We all knew that there was a higher probability that we give the ball back and the opponent tries a long fg before the half than us driving down and attempting our own fg.


Sure sounds like the first game with Ravens

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Quote:
Personally I think he sucks.


Would you care to provide some specific examples of how his playcalling and design are inferior to those of other offensive coordinators? Would you please talk about the route trees, blocking schemes, horizontal and vertical stretches, timing of the plays, etc?

Or, are you opinions more along the lines of how anarchy makes formulates his opinions?


I have on multiple occasions on this forum. I don't have the time to do it this second, but I'll come back to it. He's an average OC who relies on 6 year old offensive philosophies is what it boils down to. He, however, draws these offensive philosophies from tape, not from the source (Chip Kelly, Urban, Guz Malzahan, even Chud to some extent have all strongly influenced his recent offenses). He's a good middle man between archaic offenses of the 2000's and modern day football. He just doesn't have the knowledge to properly employ the tactics of modern day football to the extent that a decent OC would.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
ThatGuy Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
I just don't understand why he had 3 different playbooks for the 3 starting QBs..

The offense we were running the first 10 weeks, seemed perfect for Manziel.. Run the ball, roll out, play action, etc.

Then Manziel started and we had all these bunch formations and read option crap... I was annoyed.

I do think Kyle occasionally suffers from "Smartest Guy in the Room" syndrome..


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739
Yeah the play calling during Manziels start was horrible...gave Manziel no space to run the offense...However I'm thinking that was all of Manziels fault...Manziel didn't know the O that we were running with Hoyer... shanahan had to dial back the offense and let Manziel run the limited formation and plays he did know....just ugly

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
9ers need to hire Tomsula and be done with it.

I would have loved if we hired him last year.


LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,197
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,197
Shanny didn't impress me... we had another QB controversy 11 games into the season..

And running up the middle the last 5 games with rookie RB's.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I will be anxiously awaiting your expert analysis. LOL

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
A general comment. You guys would not know good play design and play calling if it slapped you in the face.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I will be anxiously awaiting your expert analysis. LOL


"I coach my 5 year old's pee wee team and we're 4-1. I've also won a super bowl in Madden. I know what I'm talking about."

This is why people don't make time to debate with you. You constantly try to belittle without the ethos to do it successfully. It's honestly a waste of my time to even try to talk to you, because you'll just run into your little hole and ask why I'm picking on you. My cases against Shanny have been said time and time again. It's extremely well documented and I'm pretty sure you've received hands in our verbal fisticuffs on this subject before.

To prove that you're worthy of a debate, can you explain why Shanny is such a good OC despite him not putting up the same stats with a better cast of players? Please use the differences between the air coryell and the west coast offense in your answer.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Picking on me? LOL

You made an ignorant statement. I asked you to clarify. You refused. You then turned it around and hurled an insult and asked me to explain why he is good.

That is called avoidance.

You're full of crap on this one, CHS. You are just making stuff up.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:
That is called avoidance.


smile

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Picking on me? LOL

You made an ignorant statement. I asked you to clarify. You refused. You then turned it around and hurled an insult and asked me to explain why he is good.

That is called avoidance.

You're full of crap on this one, CHS. You are just making stuff up.


Look, I'm not going to try to explain to you in words why Shanny is an underachiever, in the same vein of Todd Haley, so I'll let the stats prove the point. The Cleveland Browns of 2013 scored more points than the Cleveland Browns of 2014, despite the 2014 team being a lot better in every way besides TE and #1 WR. Most importantly, they had real quarterback stability for most of the season and an offensive philosophy that both of their QBs were better suited for. Now if Shanny is such an amazing offensive mind why can he not score more points with a better team that's more suited to his play style than the previous regime?

Problems I have with Shanny's Offense: Tempo, Playcalling, Unneedlessly complicated for a first year offense, Confusing himself, Not being complicated enough in the zone read offense (If run correctly you should have 4 reads in a 2 back formation of the zone read).

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Here is one article from that has direct quotes from Washington Redskins' players, including Santana Moss:

Quote:
0


Reddit

Cleveland Browns 2014

What should the Cleveland Browns do with Johnny Manziel?: Hey Mary Kay!
Cleveland Browns' 2014: Mike Pettine's season was "solid" -- Bud Shaw's Sports Spin (videos)
Terry's Talkin' about Cleveland Browns, Justin Gilbert and the draft -- Terry Pluto (video)
How Jim O'Neil went from 'meathead' college player to Cleveland Browns' energetic defensive coordinator
Cleveland Browns' Joe Thomas earns first-team All Pro honors for a fifth time

All Stories | All Videos

ASHBURN, Va. – After the Browns hired Kyle Shanahan in February, Brian Hoyer placed a call to his old college teammate and Washington Redskins quarterback Kirk Cousins.

The competitive St. Ignatius product wanted a jumpstart on the offensive system and a scouting report on the coordinator who the Redskins had fired as part of a messy and public coaching-staff purge.

"I told him nothing but good things," Cousins said.

"He's one of those guys who were going to put you in position to be successful. There are those play callers that when you leave a drive you know the play calling put you in a good position.

"With Kyle, every time I came off the field I found myself going over to him and saying, 'Great calls.'"

The Browns, who face the Redskins on Monday night in Washington, hardly resemble the top-10 offenses Shanahan has coordinated in four of the past six years. They haven't scored a touchdown in their team scrimmage or first exhibition game. Receivers drop passes. Quarterbacks are inconsistent. The offense appears slow to grasp schemes.

But a sampling of Redskins -- including Robert Griffin III, who had a falling-out with Shanahan -- reveals a continued belief in the system he installed over four seasons. In fact, the offense new coach Jay Gruden runs is similar to the one Shanahan employed. The Redskins even retained the zone-blocking scheme that turned unheralded Alfred Morris into a Pro Bowl running back.

"We had some ups and downs," Griffin said diplomatically of his two seasons under Shanahan. "We were able to win the division (in 2012). The next year we had a disastrous season going 3-13.

"I think Kyle has a great, innovative mind and does some great things with the play calling and formations. Nobody can ever knock him for that."

'Adapt and adjust'

Browns fans have heard about Shanahan's ability to run varied offenses in Houston and Washington. While they might have forgotten, the Browns got an unwanted taste of his talents on Dec. 16, 2012 as Cousins made his first NFL start in place of an injured Griffin.
Kyle ShanahanView full sizeBrowns offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan spent the last four seasons with the Washington Redskins. Associated Press

Shanahan scrapped the read-option plays and tweaked the offense to fit Cousins' skill set. The result was a 26-of-37 effort for 329 yards and two touchdowns.

"He put some things right in my wheelhouse," Cousins said. "He's not one to get set in his ways. He's always looking for ways to do his job better."

Shanahan demonstrated his play-calling versatility in the Browns' preseason opener. Hoyer took 60 percent of his 25 snaps under center to capitalize on his conventional style. Nearly half of Johnny Manziel's 27 reps came from the pistol formation to take advantage of his mobility.

"Kyle will adapt and adjust his offense to the talent level and that's a sign of a smart offensive coordinator," said former Redskins quarterback Joe Theismann. "You'll see him have two different kinds of offense in Cleveland. (Hoyer) moves pretty well, but Johnny has exceptional skill with his legs."

Manziel has struggled with the wordiness of Shanahan's play calls. Cousins conceded they're a mouthful, especially for rookies used to the brevity in many college programs. He's convinced, however, the Texas A&M product will learn to spit them out.

The Browns signed former Redskins third-stringer Rex Grossman this week to help Hoyer and Manziel decode the offense. They reportedly had strong interest in acquiring Cousins, but the Redskins rejected a draft day trade for a fourth-round pick.

"I think all off-season there was that possibility," the quarterback said. "My wife and I were ready to roll with whatever happened."

Another high-profile QB

Shanahan is coaching his second Heisman Trophy winner in two years. Griffin and Manziel, a pair of much-hyped, dual-threat quarterbacks, met this summer at the Nissan "Heisman House." The topic of Shanahan's offense was a central part of their 15-minute discussion. Griffin said he tutored Manziel on some finer points of the system, but thought he had a good handle of it.

Strained relations between Griffin and the Shanahans -- Kyle and head coach Mike -- dominated the second half of last season, taking the form of many anonymously sourced stories. The coordinator's people skills and maturity were questioned.
I think Kyle has a great, innovative mind and does some great things with the play calling and formations. Nobody can knock him for that.

Following an electric rookie year, Griffin regressed after coming off surgery to repair two knee ligaments. Some Redskins observers believe the quarterback lost trust in Shanahan for continuing to run the zone read even as Griffin was laboring.

"I'm not going to say it was easy," the coordinator said in February of the trying times he endured in 2013. "Nothing's easy when you go through something like that. But I do believe going through it -- Robert and I in the long run -- it'll make both of us better. It's something that is a challenge, and I do think going through that, as hard as it was, will help me."

It's believed Griffin had deeper issues with Mike Shanahan. The quarterback didn't rule out an on-field chat with his former coordinator Monday night.

"If we get a chance to talk I'm sure we'll make that happen," he said. "If we don't it won't be anything that's vindictive. I can tell you this, nobody watches more film than Kyle Shanahan."

Browns fans must hope the lessons learned with Griffin will benefit Shanahan in his mentoring of Manziel.

'Schemes make players'

Santana Moss has heard the concerns about a Browns receiving corps expected to lose Josh Gordon to a drug suspension. Absent the All Pro, it could be one of the league's worst, a mishmash of aging castoffs and unproven youngsters.

The Redskins receiver thinks otherwise. His source of confidence? The Browns' new offensive coordinator.
'Schemes make players' Washington Redskins receiver Santana Moss believes Kyle Shanahan's schemes will benefit the Browns receiving corps.

"They still have talent," Moss said, "I get little pissed off when they start naming names in this league. You don't have to be a name guy in this league to play well in a good corps, a good scheme. Schemes make players. If you're in a good system it makes you.

"Those guys ought to be able to thrive real nice in that offense because it's going to give you so many chances to get open."

Those comments might produce eye rolls from cynical Browns fans. They are likely to put more stock, however, in the assessment of Morris on Shanahan's success with the run game. The Redskins finished top-5 in rushing the past two seasons.

Since Shanahan's arrival, the Browns have invested heavily in the ground game, acquiring Ben Tate through free agency and drafting Terrance West in the third round. The club also has adopted the zone-blocking scheme and drafted guard Joel Bitonio in the second round.

"(The Shanahans) do a good job of finding running backs to fit their system," said Morris, a 2012 sixth-round gem from Florida Atlantic. "It's not that every running back is going to be a success in that system. They do a good job of weeding through the draft and free agency to find which ones make sense for them."

As the Browns stumble about searching for an offensive flow, Cousins' encouraging words to Hoyer in February seem hard to believe. But before heading into the Redskins' locker room Friday, the third-year quarterback doubled down.

"Those guys have a lot to look forward to," Cousins said. "They're in good hands with Kyle."


I was looking for some video to show the route trees, but couldn't find any in these past 10 minutes. I'll try again later.

Look man.......I hate to be an ass, but no one says a daggone thing when I say Celine Deon has a great voice and Clem corrects me. Why not? Because he is a professional musician. Yet, when I try to educate some of you on football schematics, you get all defensive and resort to insults.

Screw you.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
His offense worked when our line was healthy and there was no Gordon.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
ThatGuy Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Quote:
I hate to be an ass, but no one says a daggone thing when I say Celine Deon has a great voice and Clem corrects me. Why not? Because he is a professional musician.


Are you an NFL Coach?


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: RocketOptimist
His offense worked when our line was healthy and there was no Gordon.


In a vacuum I could see where this could be granted credence as to why our offense under-performed opposed to last year on just that fact alone. However, last year we had Brandon Weeden and JC as our QB's. Losing a top 2 center in the NFL will certainly destroy a team, but so will playing either of the aforementioned QB's. I admit that Shanny has some merits, but he's a bit out of water and is too ambitious too quick. That's what holds him back. I'm also not going to lie that I'm not holding him to a high standard, but the reality is, he should be held to a high standard. All of the coaches should be held to a high standard. We are an extremely talented team, maybe one of the top 5-10 in the league. Coaching is what's holding us back.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
Quote:
We are an extremely talented team, maybe one of the top 5-10 in the league.


We're not that consistent to be in the top 5-10. We're in the middle of the pack. Take off your brown and orange glasses tongue

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Do you have the experience that I do?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: RocketOptimist
Quote:
We are an extremely talented team, maybe one of the top 5-10 in the league.


We're not that consistent to be in the top 5-10. We're in the middle of the pack. Take off your brown and orange glasses tongue


I'd say consistency is a matter of coaching, not a matter of talent wink

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
e are an extremely talented team, maybe one of the top 5-10 in the league. Coaching is what's holding us back.


That is a completely illogical argument. How are we a top 5 or 10 talented team? Seriously?

You say you don't have time to tell me how our play design is inept, but you seemingly have time to make stupid ass posts like that one.

Dude, prove to us why our offensive play design is inept. We are anxious to hear you break down the blocking schemes, tree routes, horizontal and vertical stretches, traps, counters, misdirections, etc.

I truthfully think you don't squat about any of that stuff and you will come back w/some personal comment.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Do you have the experience that I do?


-- George O'Leary

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
And this is why this board sucks. People throw out strong opinions, but refuse to back them up w/logic and reason and instead, resort to idiotic retorts.

Whatever man.......

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Quote:
e are an extremely talented team, maybe one of the top 5-10 in the league. Coaching is what's holding us back.


That is a completely illogical argument. How are we a top 5 or 10 talented team? Seriously?

You say you don't have time to tell me how our play design is inept, but you seemingly have time to make stupid ass posts like that one.

Dude, prove to us why our offensive play design is inept. We are anxious to hear you break down the blocking schemes, tree routes, horizontal and vertical stretches, traps, counters, misdirections, etc.

I truthfully think you don't squat about any of that stuff and you will come back w/some personal comment.



Just because I don't have time to write the treatise that you're desperately asking for, doesn't mean I can't write a short paragraph. I've brought up a lot of the key concepts without bringing up the specifics, all of which you've failed to even respond to. But since you're so anxious to prove me wrong, how about you answer my questions? If you're up to it wink

As for the top 5-10 talented teams. Offensively, without a doubt. We have Josh Gordon (top 3 talented WR: top 2 bonehead), Jordan Cameron (When used properly he's a probowl TE), a top line according to PFF and two very good rookie backs. We don't have the QB or a solid #2 WR, which makes us fall back a little, but to think we're not extremely talented is hilarious.

Last edited by CHSDawg; 01/04/15 11:02 PM.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
You are out of your mind. Top 5 or 10 offense? LMAO

We suck in regards to talent.

We have one of the worst QB situations in the entire NFL, and in case you weren't aware of this, it starts and ends there.

Our RBs are two rookies who haven't proved squat.

Gordon is a punk who played in only a few games this year.

Cameron missed a good portion of the season.

We did it w/smoke and mirrors this season on offense and that is a testament to Shanny.

You are the one who made the stupid-ass comment that Shanny sucks. Prove it!

I provided some proof...........and I will provide more later. Or, perhaps you can just back the hell off and admit you were wrong by stating your opinions as facts.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Would you say we had less talent this year or more talent this year compared to last year?

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
And this is why this board sucks. People throw out strong opinions, but refuse to back them up w/logic and reason and instead, resort to idiotic retorts.

Whatever man.......


Dramatic irony at its finest.

No one's forcing you to come here, by the way. Go root for Buffalo.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
And this is why this board sucks. People throw out strong opinions, but refuse to back them up w/logic and reason and instead, resort to idiotic retorts.

Whatever man.......


This is coming from you?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Do you have the experience that I do?


Might be better answered if you told us all your exact experience.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
I know how this "I coached football!" story ends...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Originally Posted By: DeisleDawg
Shanny didn't impress me... we had another QB controversy 11 games into the season..

And running up the middle the last 5 games with rookie RB's.


We ran up the middle all season long. Like it or not, that is the best way to handle a speed defense, because running wide is often a losing proposition.

According to the NFL stats, we had 23 negative plays running left, and 33 running right.

We had 6 negative plays running up the middle.

We had 28 1st downs running left, 19 up the middle, and 41 running right. We had a much higher rate of success up the middle.

When concerning "power rushes", which are runs on 3rd or 4th down a 2 yards or less that achieve a 1st down or a TD, and also 1st and 2nd down goal to go plays from the 2 yard line or closer ... we converted 25% running left, 58% running right, and 91% running up the middle. (I know, it's a shocker)

NFL Stats: by Team Category
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?a...e&Submit=Go

I think that Shanahan did a tremendous job with what many considered to be the weakest receiver corps in the NFL. He put those players in position to succeed on a weekly basis. Further, think about how many times those guys were wide open, and the QB just completely missed them,. or else lobbed up a pass in their general direction that did not allow them to take full advantage of how wideopen they were.

We also had the 4th most rushing TD in the NFL at 17. Seattle was 1st with 20, then the Bengals with 19, and KC with 18. Then came us. That was a huge turnaround from 2013 when we didn't run for a TD till what .... week 10? (or some such drought, I am not going to look it up, but it took a long time, and IIRC, we only had 4 rushing TD all year in 2013)

I think that Shanahan did a lot of really good stuff this past year, and I think that we would have been a top half offense if not for the loss of Mack.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 595
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 595
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Would you say we had less talent this year or more talent this year compared to last year?


Well look who it is...

We had more talent this year, but it seems to me that most of the upgrade was on the defensive side of the ball. The only real upgrade on the offensive side that I can think of was Bitonio and perhaps Austin, but when you take Cameron, Gordon and Mack out of the mix (due to injury and suspension) then we were quantafiably less talented than the year before even if on paper we should have been better.

I'm not saying that I'm in love with Shannahan, I thought there were times where we went empty backfield with Hoyer and that's just a mistake both in pass protection and having the defense at least "think" run. At the other end of the extreme, we did very little two back sets which I understand can be a function of the zone read philosophy and poor FB play but man there were a lot of yards left out there because the first guy tackled our backs. Finally, my last complaint is those damn toss sweeps. It's like all the slow development of a screen pass without the extra blocking. LOL

Having said all that, I sure hope he comes back because despite what I think of as his flaws, he's better than most we've seen here and with a year with the personnel under his belt and the players running the same basic scheme it's only going to get better.


Last in, first out, the sign of a true champion!
[Linked Image from i301.photobucket.com]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 919
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 919
I would pay for Shannahan's ticket to SF, his vertical offense didn't work in Washington and it didn't work here. His QB management skills, to be polite, suck.


GO BROWNS!
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum 49ers ask for permission to talk to Kyle Shanahan

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5