Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
LOL............good point on the Rams abusing the NFC East in trades.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I never saw this one coming.

Is Philly nuts?




I agree, unless as some have said he is trade bait for a draft day move.


Just to speculate with the Browns involved, Bradford seems like a better fit here. Maybe we didn't have the bridge, backup that Philly had in Foles that Fisher required. Now we have the pick/picks that Philly requires.



Who knows? What I do think I do know is that Kelly isn't interested in keeping Bradford as his QB. It doesn't fit the mold. Does it?



I'll have to go back and look at this agin in so far as what exactly was traded to whom.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I don't see the Browns as a player in this.

And I know next to nothing about trade values, contracts, etc.........but, just skim reading this thread, it sure doesn't seem like the details of the deal lends itself to Philly trading him away. Take a look at what the Rams receive based on snaps, games, etc.

Then again...........I never saw this trade coming, so who knows............I could be dead wrong.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
We could all be wrong.



Also, The way I read it is the 2nd round pick from Philly is conditional. If they trade Bradford and he never plays for Philly, they get the pick back.



Incentive to move the guy IMO.



Strange stuff no doubt. Maybe turns in to #12 for Bradford and a 2nd rounder in 16.

Last edited by Ballpeen; 03/10/15 08:06 PM.

If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,976
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,976
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
We could all be wrong.



Also, The way I read it is the 2nd round pick from Philly is conditional. If they trade Bradford and he never plays for Philly, they get the pick back.



Incentive to move the guy IMO.



Strange stuff no doubt. Maybe turns in to #12 for Bradford and a 2nd rounder in 16.


Let's get crazy and speculate the Eagles will trade the Browns Sam Bradford, Kiko Alonzo (Petinne's old linebacker), and 2 nd round picks for #12 and #19 so they can trade 3 1st round picks to Tennessee for Marcus Mariota.


"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money." Margarat Thatcher
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
Maybe we just need to wait and see....;)


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Peen,the most the Eagles can get back is a 3rd rounder (if he gets hurt again). Nobody in their right mind is giving a first round pick or Bradford, and the Eagles would have to at least a first to have a shot at moving up for MM.

Only way I see a potential trade with the Browns that makes since is if MM drops to 12 we could swap picks with them and get Bradford to move down....hmm I would consider that. I honestly think they traded for him to be their starter though.


Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Quote:
The Browns were one. RT @SI_PeterKing: There were other teams, multiple, involved in the chase for Bradford.


Link

Can't blame the Rams for taking the better offer.

Bradford is a pretty good fit for Kelly's offense. He is very accurate. Also, now has Jason Peters protecting his blindside.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,683
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,683
My continuing scenario is that Bradford will be used as bait for a move up trade to get Mariota.

Philly may not be done.


Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,331
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,331
Originally Posted By: Tulsa
Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty

Wow, Thats 2 QBs I thought we were going to take a run at. Foles & Bradford.

Somebody please tell me we are not going into the season with McCown backed up by JF.


Okay, we're going into the season with JM backup by McCown.


Ha-ha!

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,331
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,331
P.S. I still would have been much, much more enthused going into the season with Bradford at the helm. Oh well.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
j/c

this trade is just a head scratcher. St Louis fleeced the eagles in my opinion. Bradford is not worth more then a second rounder straight up, injury history and massive contract.

And do the eagle plan on starting Bradford, I just don't see him as a fit to that offense..... So is he trade bait? Why not just keep Foles and the picks to deal, that would have made more sense.

The rams were a QB away from really being legit. I think they just found their guy...

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
I agree. I don't see how Foles is worth more than Bradford. Especially considering Bradford's injury history and contract.

Also, I think this tells us what the league thinks about Foles.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: ChargerDawg
My continuing scenario is that Bradford will be used as bait for a move up trade to get Mariota.


How does giving up picks make sense in the "get Mariota" grand scheme? Not saying you are wrong, I just don't understand it if that is the plan.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
If we go off what this article is saying, it seems like Bradford is in Philadelphia to stay:

Quote:
This was a move long in the works. The Eagles eyed Rams quarterback Sam Bradford for weeks, and on Tuesday they made the move, acquiring Bradford in exchange for Nick Foles. Draft picks were involved. It was a huge move.

A former No. 1 overall draft pick (2010), Bradford's NFL career has been stunted by a lack of offensive talent around him early in his St. Louis tenure and by injuries late with the Rams. He played only seven games in 2013 after being pulled down on a run to the sidelines and tearing the anterior cruciate ligament in his left knee and then missed all of 2014 when he was drilled in the pocket and tore the same ACL in the preseason opener.

An extremely talented quarterback who is 6-4 and 224 pounds, Bradford is able to make every throw from every position on the field. When the Eagles studied him -- and they did so very, very extensively before the trade -- they saw a quarterback with special accuracy, with touch, with a big arm. A quarterback who can get the ball out quickly, who can make fast, good decisions. Bradford is, the Eagles think, a classic pocket quarterback with just enough mobility to work the pocket well and keep plays alive.

And so a deal was done on Tuesday, one that brings to Philadelphia the quarterback that head coach Chip Kelly wants. He wanted Sam Bradford. He identified Sam Bradford as a special talent who can make this offense soar. It cost the Eagles Foles, and everyone wishes him the best of luck. It cost the Eagles a second-round draft pick in 2016 and a swap of picks in 2015 that is a difference of, roughly, 20 spots in the draft after compensatory picks are considered.

It is a gamble, no question about that. Kelly isn't afraid to make difficult, out-of-the-box decisions. But it is a gamble with a lot of upside because the Eagles think Bradford has the goods to be a franchise-type quarterback.

The misconception, perhaps, is that the offense the Eagles is one that we saw at Oregon, where the quarterback was mobile and a running threat. That's not what the Eagles are offensively. The Eagles can run the football effectively with their running backs -- and there is a need there that will be filled -- and their blocking scheme, and they need a quarterback who can be accurate, who can play tempo football and who can get the ball to the receivers -- a need position that the Eagles will address -- in a timely fashion down the field and in the short passing game.

Bradford, the Eagles feel, can do it all. He had his troubles in St. Louis throwing to the likes of Brandon Lloyd and Brandon Gibson and Danny Amendola and Austin Pettis and Lance Kendricks and Laurent Robinson and Greg Salas and Jared Cook and Tavon Austin. The Rams didn't have much other than Steven Jackson running the football to exhaustion working with a pretty bad offensive line.

And they had Bradford. And they pinned all of their hopes on him and just didn't give him much help as he absorbed 105 sacks in his first three seasons (42 games) and another 15 in the seven games he played in 2013 when Bradford threw 14 touchdown passes and four interceptions. Oh, and consider this: Bradford has five games (of 49 played) in which he has thrown multiple interceptions. Foles and Mark Sanchez combined for seven multiple-interception games last season alone.

That's the player the Eagles think they have acquired, a special talent with far more upside than they saw with Foles -- and no lack of respect for him. He was very productive here and everyone wishes Foles the best of luck in St. Louis -- or any other quarterback they saw in the market -- free agency or the draft. The Eagles, despite the overwhelming rush by the media and fans to think otherwise, were not going to move up, up, up in the draft and take Oregon's Marcus Mariota, the Heisman Trophy winner whom Kelly recruited. Nor did the Eagles feel their best option was to stay put and stick with Foles and extend his contract for the future.

Certainly, the deal hinges on Bradford remaining healthy and staying on the field for this offense. He had a concussion and some shoulder injuries at Oklahoma. He has the two ACL injuries and a shoulder injury in the NFL. Only twice in his five seasons has Bradford played a full 16 games.

The Eagles believe in their sports science program and their strength and conditioning program and they have the plan to put the right pieces around Bradford to help him stay healthy and make him more productive than he's been in his career.

That's why the Eagles did the deal, one on which they worked extremely hard and one that was, according to reports, off and on a couple of times -- at least -- in the last few weeks. They got the quarterback they wanted, one they think can be special in this offense. You may like the deal. You may not. You may have questions that just don't have answers right now, specifically how the Eagles will replace the production from departed running back LeSean McCoy and wide receiver Jeremy Maclin and the weapons Kelly and vice president of player personnel Ed Marynowitz will bring in between now and September. Fair enough.

Wins and losses will dictate the wisdom of this decision. It was gutsy, no doubt about it. But being gutsy and having conviction is why Chairman and CEO Jeffrey Lurie hired Kelly after the 2012 4-12 season. Twenty regular-season victories and a playoff appearance was a nice way to start Kelly's NFL head coaching career, but it wasn't the goal. Winning the whole thing is the objective, and the Eagles wanted the best quarterback they could get and Kelly wanted Bradford and then went out and made the deal.

Sam Bradford is the quarterback Kelly thinks can operate this offense to maximum efficiency. That's why he is an Eagle today.


Philadelphia Eagles.com

It would be weird if a team's website built a player up like this and then ended up trading him. Stranger things have happened.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
It's kind of a weird situation.. if you build him up only to trade him then that looks bad... but if you downplay it and treat him like an asset that will be moved later and he ends up starting, then you also look bad...


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,683
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,683
I think Bradford is a good QB, but Foles will play more games this year.

Good things Sanchez is the backup.


Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
I thought the Rams gave Eagles the 2nd rounder? It makes more sense the other way around but I don't understand the deal unless the team they want to move up with - Jets...cough...made Bradford part of the deal.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: ChargerDawg
My continuing scenario is that Bradford will be used as bait for a move up trade to get Mariota.

Philly may not be done.


I do not see how this helps Philly get Mariota. If anything, I think they are further away now than they were before the trade. I heard Philly gave up a future 2nd as well. That pick would do more for a move up than Bradford will. To get up to the top 5 or so, Philly needs a lot of ammo. Philly would need to be able to get really close without Bradford in order to get there with Bradford.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: CapCity Dawg
Originally Posted By: ChargerDawg
My continuing scenario is that Bradford will be used as bait for a move up trade to get Mariota.

Philly may not be done.


I do not see how this helps Philly get Mariota. If anything, I think they are further away now than they were before the trade. I heard Philly gave up a future 2nd as well. That pick would do more for a move up than Bradford will. To get up to the top 5 or so, Philly needs a lot of ammo. Philly would need to be able to get really close without Bradford in order to get there with Bradford.



Oh cap...if the team that Philly is dealing with wanted Bradford and not Foles, the deal makes perfect sense.

Now, the team Philly is dealing with gives up a first and second round pick from this draft for Bradford, and the Eagles use those picks to help them get up the draft board to land Mariota.

Do you get it now?


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
..and my fear is, it's the Browns giving up a first and second round pick to Philly for Bradford.



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
For those wanting "proof", I hate that request by the way. It's an unfair argument as none of us can ever "prove" anything. Here is some evidence though.

Sam Bradford - QB - Eagles

The Browns reportedly tried trading for Sam Bradford before he was shipped to the Eagles in the Nick Foles deal.

Despite coming off back-to-back ACL tears, there was a multi-team market for Bradford's services. The Philadelphia Inquirer is somewhat noncommittal, but tentatively expects the Eagles to keep Bradford and start him in 2015, as opposed to using Bradford as a trade chip to move up and draft Marcus Mariota. We'll believe Bradford is staying in Philly if the sides strike a restructured contract. Bradford's 2015 base salary of $12.985 million is entirely unreasonable for a player of his injury-riddled and largely ineffective pedigree.

Related: Browns
Source: Philadelphia Inquirer

http://www.rotoworld.com/playernews/nfl/football


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
The Browns reportedly tried trading for Sam Bradford before he was shipped to the Eagles in the Nick Foles deal.

Despite coming off back-to-back ACL tears, there was a multi-team market for Bradford's services. The Philadelphia Inquirer is somewhat noncommittal, but tentatively expects the Eagles to keep Bradford and start him in 2015, as opposed to using Bradford as a trade chip to move up and draft Marcus Mariota. We'll believe Bradford is staying in Philly if the sides strike a restructured contract. Bradford's 2015 base salary of $12.985 million is entirely unreasonable for a player of his injury-riddled and largely ineffective pedigree.


Anyone believe Chip Kelly is not going to try to move up in the draft to get Mariota?

If the Browns were attempting to deal for Bradford before he was shipped to Philly, what is to stop them from dealing with Philly for Sam Bradford now that he is no longer with the Rams?

As I said, I fear it's the Browns who are willing to give up multiple draft picks to Philly for Bradford...a 1st rounder and a 2nd rounder.

Last edited by mac; 03/11/15 08:09 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Quote:
Anyone believe Chip Kelly is not going to try to move up in the draft to get Mariota?


I don't....not anymore.

And I don't think the Browns are going to give a 1st/2nd rounder for a QB with an injury history, making $12M in the final year of his deal and will be a FA next year.

Think about it....if the Browns were willing to do that, Bradford would have been traded to us yesterday.



At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
Quote:
Anyone believe Chip Kelly is not going to try to move up in the draft to get Mariota?


I don't....not anymore.

And I don't think the Browns are going to give a 1st/2nd rounder for a QB with an injury history, making $12M in the final year of his deal and will be a FA next year.

Think about it....if the Browns were willing to do that, Bradford would have been traded to us yesterday.



I agree, it is a huge risk for the Browns to give up a 1 & 2 for Bradford...

Bradford is a huge injury risk, based on his injury history.

The reason the deal for Bradford could not happen with the Rams...they needed a starting QB in exchange for Bradford. Obviously the Rams felt Foles would fill their needs, thus they dealt with the Eagles and not the Browns.

Also, I'm guessing that Bradfords contract get renegotiated down to a more reasonable level.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,060
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
Quote:
Anyone believe Chip Kelly is not going to try to move up in the draft to get Mariota?


I don't....not anymore.

And I don't think the Browns are going to give a 1st/2nd rounder for a QB with an injury history, making $12M in the final year of his deal and will be a FA next year.

Think about it....if the Browns were willing to do that, Bradford would have been traded to us yesterday.



I agree, it is a huge risk for the Browns to give up a 1 & 2 for Bradford...

Bradford is a huge injury risk, based on his injury history.

The reason the deal for Bradford could not happen with the Rams...they needed a starting QB in exchange for Bradford. Obviously the Rams felt Foles would fill their needs, thus they dealt with the Eagles and not the Browns.

Also, I'm guessing that Bradfords contract get renegotiated down to a more reasonable level.


The starting QB thing could be true. Still in comparison to what you are afraid the Browns will do and what package the Eagles send over, I have a hard believing Foles > #12 or #19.

Again, I don't think it is a package the Browns are considering and even though I like Bradford, not at the price. To much future uncertainty to give up that much.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
I agree, it is a huge risk for the Browns to give up a 1 & 2 for Bradford...

Bradford is a huge injury risk, based on his injury history.

The reason the deal for Bradford could not happen with the Rams...they needed a starting QB in exchange for Bradford. Obviously the Rams felt Foles would fill their needs, thus they dealt with the Eagles and not the Browns.

Also, I'm guessing that Bradfords contract get renegotiated down to a more reasonable level.





Quote:
The starting QB thing could be true. Still in comparison to what you are afraid the Browns will do and what package the Eagles send over, I have a hard believing Foles > #12 or #19.


Memp...the 1 & 2 I'm referring to is one of the Browns 1st round picks and the Browns 2nd round pick for BRADFORD.

Quote:
Again, I don't think it is a package the Browns are considering and even though I like Bradford, not at the price. To much future uncertainty to give up that much.


memp...the cost I was talking about was a 1st round pick and a 2nd round pick. My problem with Bradford, his injury history..durability.

Last edited by mac; 03/11/15 09:13 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
cant believe all the effort the eagles are going through just to try and trade bradford for johnny manziel!!!!


being a browns fan is like taking your dog to vet every week to be put down...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,961
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,961
Originally Posted By: pblack18707
cant believe all the effort the eagles are going through just to try and trade bradford for johnny manziel!!!!


rofl


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,509
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,509
Originally Posted By: mac
..and my fear is, it's the Browns giving up a first and second round pick to Philly for Bradford.



If that were going to be the case, why wouldn't they have made that offer to the Rams? I think that a 1st and a 2nd would have acquired Bradford. Foles had some nice moments, but is still something of a question mark. With another 1st and another 2nd, the Rams could do a lot of damage in this draft, and maybe even could have just traded a 1st round pick straight up for Foles at that point. (if this was all happening in the background)


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
I agree thyat it looks like something is up, though I don't know if we are involved.


The thing we couldn't offer the Rams was a QB in return for Bradford. That would be the likely reason we couldn't get anything done with Bradford simply sending them picks.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
For what it's worth, most people around the league seem to think Bradford is staying in Philadelphia.

Quote:
Chip Kelly says he thinks Marcus Mariota is the best QB on draft, but wants to "dispel" rumors. Says he won't mortgage the future.


Link

Quote:
Chip: I was offered a first round pick for Bradford this morning.


Link

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,827
Quote:
Chip: I was offered a first round pick for Bradford this morning.


Link



I find this hard to believe but if true I hope it wasn't from us.

Last edited by Jester; 03/11/15 04:14 PM.

Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
dan snyder lol

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Jester
Quote:
Chip: I was offered a first round pick for Bradford this morning.


Link



I find this hard to believe but if true I hope it wasn't from us.


I could see us offering pick #19 for Bradford and the Eagles second round pick. The overall point is this, if Kelly was trying to trade up for Mariota, he would take the pick. He didn't. Bradford is the Eagles QB.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,337
F
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
F
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,337
Or he made up the offer for a #1.

I see Chip Kelly at Michigan in 2018 after he runs the Eagles into the ground. Just think about this Nick Foles, LeSean McCoy, Jeremy Maclin, DeSean Jackson, for basically nothing in return.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Jester
Quote:
Chip: I was offered a first round pick for Bradford this morning.


Link



I find this hard to believe but if true I hope it wasn't from us.


I could see us offering pick #19 for Bradford and the Eagles second round pick. The overall point is this, if Kelly was trying to trade up for Mariota, he would take the pick. He didn't. Bradford is the Eagles QB.


This.

No way a better offer comes by.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Foles - He got Bradford who he thinks is a franchise QB (I don't agree).

McCoy - He got Alonso (who was DROY) and opened up a ton of cap space allowing him to sign Maxwell (who I don't think is all that good).

Maclin - nothing

Jackson - nothing

I think the Eagles win the NFC East this year.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
For what it's worth, most people around the league seem to think Bradford is staying in Philadelphia.

Quote:
Chip Kelly says he thinks Marcus Mariota is the best QB on draft, but wants to "dispel" rumors. Says he won't mortgage the future.


Link

Quote:
Chip: I was offered a first round pick for Bradford this morning.


Link


When it comes to free agency and the draft, you can't believe a word these guys say...just a couple of days ago, Jeff Fisher said that Bradford's was not being shopped...lol.

It may be that Kelly is going to dangle Bradford to see if he can squeeze as much draft value out of him as he can.

The Browns may have already tipped their hand and now Kelly can sit and use the Browns offer to push for more.

I don't believe Kelly...that the Eagles are set with Bradford and that the Eagles are not looking to make a run for Mariota.

If the Browns did already make an offer for Bradford, Kelly probably figures the Browns will offer more if he simply sets on Bradford.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,690
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
For what it's worth, most people around the league seem to think Bradford is staying in Philadelphia.

Quote:
Chip Kelly says he thinks Marcus Mariota is the best QB on draft, but wants to "dispel" rumors. Says he won't mortgage the future.


Link

Quote:
Chip: I was offered a first round pick for Bradford this morning.


Link



And after reading more, I might tend to agree at this hour. See....I do have a open mind that consideres all the possibilities.


I read where Murray called Kelly wanting to play there with Bradford, and Bradford did run a spread O in college. The spread doesn't have to mean you need a Tebow type to run the heck out of the ball.


We will see.....interesting stuff going on right now.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Sam Bradford Traded to Eagles

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5