Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#938832 03/18/15 02:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Dawg_LB Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Quote:
The NFL has announced that the following rule changes, bylaw changes and resolution changes will be discussed by the Competition Committee and considered by the owners at next week’s league meetings:

Rule changes

— Allow any call to be challenged.

— Allow penalties to be challenged.

— Allow coaches to challenge personal fouls.

— Allow personal fouls to be reviewed, but not necessarily on coaches’ challenges.

— Make all fouls that result in automatic first downs reviewable.

— Allow replay review of rulings related to hits on defenseless receivers.

— Review every foul for hits on defenseless players.

— Increase the number of coaches’ challenges from two to three.

— Expand replay

— Add the game clock at the end of the half and end of the game to the list of things that can be reviewed on replay.

— Add the play clock to the list of things that can be reviewed on replay.

— Put fixed cameras on all boundaries of the playing field, sidelines, goal line.

— Allow a “bonus try” after a two-point conversion.

— Do not allow players to push rushers when a team is punting. (This is already the rule on field goals and extra points.)

— Guarantee both teams a possession in overtime.

— Ban peelback blocks by any offensive player.

— Give defensive players “defenseless receiver” protection on interceptions.

— If there’s a dead ball foul, unsportsmanlike conduct or taunting at the end of the first half, it will carry over to the second half.

— Ban running backs from chop blocking outside the tackle box.

— Allow linebackers to wear jersey numbers 40-49 in addition to 50-59 and 90-99.

— If an eligible player reports as an ineligible receiver to the referee, he must align within the tackle box.

Bylaw proposals

— Eliminate the 75-player cutdown.

— Expand rules to allow teams more contact with draft eligible players.

— Permit teams that play on Thursday to designate one player eligible to return to the active list from injured reserve.

— Permit players on Physically Unable to Perform to begin practicing earlier.

Resolution

— Allow teams with retractable roofs to open their roofs during halftime shows.


http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/03/18/competition-committee-announces-2015-rule-proposals/

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Allow a "Bonus Try" after a two-point conversion, what on earth does that mean!?

-Allow linebackers to wear jersey numbers 40-49; I thought they COULD do that already?

I don't really like the idea of adding all of these extra challenges, seems like it can only slow the game down more? Unless they count towards the coaches two available challenges.

I absolutely DO NOT like guaranteeing each team a possession in overtime. If the receiving team scores a touchdown, they deserve the win, period.



"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
"Put fixed cameras on all boundaries of the playing field, sidelines, goal line.'

I have always wondered why this didnt happen years ago


Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Originally Posted By: Dawg_LB
[quote]
— Guarantee both teams a possession in overtime.


BOOOOOOOOOO!

I like the fact a team could score a TD and end the game. Reward them for trying!

Heck, I'd also like to add a rule where a team can only punt on their first possession in OT too. That would practically eliminate ties.


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,980
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,980
With the new rules in 2015, games start at 1pm EST and end at 6pm.

Just kidding, actually I don't even care.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
With the new rules in 2015, games start at 1pm EST and end at 6pm.

Just kidding, actually I don't even care.



No doubt.

I'd like them to start using a clock again on replays. Meaning, if you can't reverse the call in 60 seconds, move along.


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Originally Posted By: Punchsmack
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
With the new rules in 2015, games start at 1pm EST and end at 6pm.

Just kidding, actually I don't even care.



No doubt.

I'd like them to start using a clock again on replays. Meaning, if you can't reverse the call in 60 seconds, move along.


+1

Excellent idea.



"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
Originally Posted By: MrKelso
Allow a "Bonus Try" after a two-point conversion, what on earth does that mean!?


I read that Indy proposed this: If you score a t.d., and go for 2 and are successful, you should be allowed an extra point kick from midfield.

So, score a 6, convert the e.p. for 2, then get a try from midfield as well. Possibly a 9 point t.d.

Not saying I like it, agree with it, or disagree with it: But, that's where it came from.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Quote:
Allow any call to be challenged.

Allow penalties to be challenged.


Interesting ideas in theory, tough to interpret in practice. Unless they possibly get the additional challenges, or the call is blatantly bad, coaches will be hard pressed to pull the trigger fearing interpretation of the rules weighed against loss of a challenge.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
Originally Posted By: MrKelso
Allow a "Bonus Try" after a two-point conversion, what on earth does that mean!?


I read that Indy proposed this: If you score a t.d., and go for 2 and are successful, you should be allowed an extra point kick from midfield.

So, score a 6, convert the e.p. for 2, then get a try from midfield as well. Possibly a 9 point t.d.

Not saying I like it, agree with it, or disagree with it: But, that's where it came from.


What the hell is wrong with the regular scoring system that's in place now!? Won't all that nonsense drag the game on longer?



"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Wow, it looks as if the want to make the game longer....


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
Originally Posted By: MrKelso
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
Originally Posted By: MrKelso
Allow a "Bonus Try" after a two-point conversion, what on earth does that mean!?


I read that Indy proposed this: If you score a t.d., and go for 2 and are successful, you should be allowed an extra point kick from midfield.

So, score a 6, convert the e.p. for 2, then get a try from midfield as well. Possibly a 9 point t.d.

Not saying I like it, agree with it, or disagree with it: But, that's where it came from.


What the hell is wrong with the regular scoring system that's in place now!? Won't all that nonsense drag the game on longer?


Hey, I don't make the news, I just tell what I've read.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/indianapolis-colts-propose-bonkers-nfl-192434075.html

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,715
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,715
So a player must shotgun a beer before going onto the field of play wasn't proposed?

Well, that's boring.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Genius! I agree. Hate sitting through replays, challenges, etc.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
I like the NFL, but I don't like the constant twerking of the rules. Of all the sports leagues, the NFL seems to change them the most.



Here is an idea.....how about fewer rules?


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
I like the NFL, but I don't like the constant twerking of the rules. Of all the sports leagues, the NFL seems to change them the most.



Here is an idea.....how about fewer rules?


Isn't twerking only in the Lingerie league?


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
Originally Posted By: MrKelso
Allow a "Bonus Try" after a two-point conversion, what on earth does that mean!?


I read that Indy proposed this: If you score a t.d., and go for 2 and are successful, you should be allowed an extra point kick from midfield.

So, score a 6, convert the e.p. for 2, then get a try from midfield as well. Possibly a 9 point t.d.

Not saying I like it, agree with it, or disagree with it: But, that's where it came from.


What Happens if we roll doubles...


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Originally Posted By: bbrowns32
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
I like the NFL, but I don't like the constant twerking of the rules. Of all the sports leagues, the NFL seems to change them the most.



Here is an idea.....how about fewer rules?


Isn't twerking only in the Lingerie league?



LOl.....I used the word on purpose. I think NFL owners have a bit much power and keep screwing it up


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
First of all, I think they need a simplification of the rules. How about these?

Defensive holding - 5 yards, no automatic 1st down.
Defensive PI - 10 yards, no spot foul, automatic 1st. (I hate the throw long - hope for a PI from the 50)
Replays - As long as you have time outs, you have replays. No TOs, no replay. Keep the other replay rules as they are.
Rate the refs - We've all seen some lousy officiating. These guys should not have jobs forever. If they blow a call bad enough, fine them.


[Linked Image from s2.excoboard.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
I say cut the number of refs.


Have one watching the QB. One on the LOS. Two in the defensive backfield and maybe one watching the line play. Mostly just watching for off sides, ball spots, and blatant fouls.


Let them play.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,511
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,511
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
Originally Posted By: MrKelso
Allow a "Bonus Try" after a two-point conversion, what on earth does that mean!?


I read that Indy proposed this: If you score a t.d., and go for 2 and are successful, you should be allowed an extra point kick from midfield.

So, score a 6, convert the e.p. for 2, then get a try from midfield as well. Possibly a 9 point t.d.

Not saying I like it, agree with it, or disagree with it: But, that's where it came from.


Fine but if you don't get the two point conversion you lose a point... 5 pt TD


<><

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Originally Posted By: jaybird
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
Originally Posted By: MrKelso
Allow a "Bonus Try" after a two-point conversion, what on earth does that mean!?


I read that Indy proposed this: If you score a t.d., and go for 2 and are successful, you should be allowed an extra point kick from midfield.

So, score a 6, convert the e.p. for 2, then get a try from midfield as well. Possibly a 9 point t.d.

Not saying I like it, agree with it, or disagree with it: But, that's where it came from.


Fine but if you don't get the two point conversion you lose a point... 5 pt TD


But if you make the FG blindfolded.. you get an extra half point..


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Originally Posted By: jaybird
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
Originally Posted By: MrKelso
Allow a "Bonus Try" after a two-point conversion, what on earth does that mean!?


I read that Indy proposed this: If you score a t.d., and go for 2 and are successful, you should be allowed an extra point kick from midfield.

So, score a 6, convert the e.p. for 2, then get a try from midfield as well. Possibly a 9 point t.d.

Not saying I like it, agree with it, or disagree with it: But, that's where it came from.


Fine but if you don't get the two point conversion you lose a point... 5 pt TD


But if you make the FG blindfolded.. you get an extra half point..


This might improve Cundiff's performance.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
I think it's a great idea to add all of those challenges. Ought to make every game 8 hours long. Games aren't long enough now, the teams don't get enough revenue from commericials. More time spent on replay equals more TV commercials, equals more money for the owners. Woo hoo! *snicker*

I despise the modern NFL. Or should I say NHL. No Hitting League. Commercials every ten seconds, hitting is being phased out year after year, defense is virtually illegal. And every damned year these idiots make more and more rules changes. Pathetic.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
One rule change I'd really love to see is a WEIGHT LIMIT. Every year they cite player injuries as reason to eliminate hitting from the sport. Well, a weight limit would really help reduce player injury. 300 pounds is the limit. if you're 299 you can play. If you hit 300 you can't. Period. After five years, make it 280 and leave it there. Better for the players overall health. Less impact when tackling. Less injuries.

Also, I'd love to see them force every single player to wear every single pad available. QB's RB"s WR's everyone has to wear thigh pads, hip pads, knee pads etc. Make a uniform and force every player to wear it. Including mouth pieces. Every player should be forced to wear a brightly colored mouth piece attached to the helmets facemask. That way it is visible to a ref if it's hanging out. If it's hanging it's a penalty. 10 yards.

That would do more to limit injury than any limitation on hitting.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77


I despise the modern NFL. Or should I say NHL. No Hitting League.



You might need to come up with something else. The real NHL is far from that. thumbsup


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
One rule change I'd really love to see is a WEIGHT LIMIT. Every year they cite player injuries as reason to eliminate hitting from the sport. Well, a weight limit would really help reduce player injury. 300 pounds is the limit. if you're 299 you can play. If you hit 300 you can't. Period. After five years, make it 280 and leave it there. Better for the players overall health. Less impact when tackling. Less injuries.

Also, I'd love to see them force every single player to wear every single pad available. QB's RB"s WR's everyone has to wear thigh pads, hip pads, knee pads etc. Make a uniform and force every player to wear it. Including mouth pieces. Every player should be forced to wear a brightly colored mouth piece attached to the helmets facemask. That way it is visible to a ref if it's hanging out. If it's hanging it's a penalty. 10 yards.

That would do more to limit injury than any limitation on hitting.


Both great ideas IMO.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
How about making spearing a penalty again?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,856
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,856
Originally Posted By: Arps
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
One rule change I'd really love to see is a WEIGHT LIMIT. Every year they cite player injuries as reason to eliminate hitting from the sport. Well, a weight limit would really help reduce player injury. 300 pounds is the limit. if you're 299 you can play. If you hit 300 you can't. Period. After five years, make it 280 and leave it there. Better for the players overall health. Less impact when tackling. Less injuries.

Also, I'd love to see them force every single player to wear every single pad available. QB's RB"s WR's everyone has to wear thigh pads, hip pads, knee pads etc. Make a uniform and force every player to wear it. Including mouth pieces. Every player should be forced to wear a brightly colored mouth piece attached to the helmets facemask. That way it is visible to a ref if it's hanging out. If it's hanging it's a penalty. 10 yards.

That would do more to limit injury than any limitation on hitting.


Both great ideas IMO.


Yeah i really like the weight limit idea...

Also I wonder ( have no idea) what if they made things like the shoulder pads actually softer so they gave more when hitting... sort of like the safer barriers in NASCAR, less rigid material,... would that lessen the impact on the person being hit?


#gmstrong

A smart person knows what to say.

A wise person knows whether or not to say it.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
I like it! Fewer rules, refs, limit appeal time.

We need the NFL to put in a get out of jail free card. Has obvious appeal IMO.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
I think the prolonged game results from the rules changes, and these serve a single purpose: More game(s), sell more beers.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
One rule change I'd really love to see is a WEIGHT LIMIT. Every year they cite player injuries as reason to eliminate hitting from the sport. Well, a weight limit would really help reduce player injury. 300 pounds is the limit. if you're 299 you can play. If you hit 300 you can't. Period. After five years, make it 280 and leave it there. Better for the players overall health. Less impact when tackling. Less injuries.

Also, I'd love to see them force every single player to wear every single pad available. QB's RB"s WR's everyone has to wear thigh pads, hip pads, knee pads etc. Make a uniform and force every player to wear it. Including mouth pieces. Every player should be forced to wear a brightly colored mouth piece attached to the helmets facemask. That way it is visible to a ref if it's hanging out. If it's hanging it's a penalty. 10 yards.

That would do more to limit injury than any limitation on hitting.

The first one is interesting, it would create a faster game and give a lot more guys a chance to compete..

The second one I'm not sure how much good that would do. I agree about the mouthguard but the pads... they really only protect against contusion injuries and most of the severe injuries have to do with twisting and turning ligaments and tendons.. I don't see how more pads would help that.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
I don't know that so many of the dangerous injuries that happen are related to 300+ pound players. The concussions almost universally are not... at least not the ones that we hear about.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
I always thought that one way to reduce concussions, especially the ones in the defensive backfield would be to widen the field by about 10 yards.

Years ago you used to have what, 3 guys in a pass pattern, now you have 5 a lot of the time.. and the number of coverage guys has gone up with that... so now you have more guys, stronger and faster guys, in the same amount of space, able to fly around and close with more speed and force than ever before... more big hits are destined to happen.... so spread them out, give them more room.

Would that make it easier on the offense to scheme and get guys open? Yea, it probably would but this isn't a tactical thought, it's a player safety thought.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
O
Legend
Online
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
Spirit's weight idea is actually a pretty good one, but I don't think it would make any impact on head injuries.

Everything below the neck, that's another story. 350lb dudes running around, turning, hitting each other. The strain on joints has got to be incredible. Plus, those big boys are in for the real pain when they retire carrying around that kind of weight, only without all of the activity.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Originally Posted By: clevesteve
I don't know that so many of the dangerous injuries that happen are related to 300+ pound players. The concussions almost universally are not... at least not the ones that we hear about.


Force equals mass times acceleration. You can't make players slower, but you can change the mass in the equation. Less massive players equals less forceful impacts.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Originally Posted By: oobernoober
Spirit's weight idea is actually a pretty good one, but I don't think it would make any impact on head injuries.

Everything below the neck, that's another story. 350lb dudes running around, turning, hitting each other. The strain on joints has got to be incredible. Plus, those big boys are in for the real pain when they retire carrying around that kind of weight, only without all of the activity.


And the strain on their hearts.... I can remember when there were no 300 pound players. The "Fridge" was considered a freak. An anomoly that probably wouldn't be repeated. Now every lineman is a "fridge". And it's not natural. Make the players adhear to a weight limit and I believe there would be less injury. And the game would be better as well. Forcing them to wear a visible mouth piece would likely lessen concussion. I've read a lot of experts say a mouthpiece is a good idea in that regard.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 21
F
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
F
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 21
Agree with defensive PI. Should be max of 15 to 20 yds. NO 40 or 50 when just throwing the ball up for grabs, hoping for the PI call

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 21
F
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
F
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 21
Just an idea. Every year, players get signed off from teams practice squads. There is no protection for the teams that have payed to develop them during the year. It would be nice if the team would have a right to sign him first if another team wants to pull him off our team's practice squad. losing Johnson last year to Minn made me think of this.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
^

Seems reasonable to me.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Page 1 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum 2015 Rule change proposals

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5